PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Euthanasia, Active”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Assisted suicide bordering on active euthanasia.

A 44-year-old woman was almost completely paralysed after a severe brainstem haemorrhage. Even after several years of efforts at rehabilitation, she remained completely dependent on the help of others. However, a special device enabled her to administer (after careful preparation) liquids through the PEG catheter despite her poorly coordinated movements. Four years after the stroke, the woman joined a right-to-die society with the wish to bring her life to an end. A doctor working with this organisation prescribed her a lethal dose of pentobarbital. In the presence of her husband and her companion from the organisation, the woman administered herself the lethal substance by means of the device. On the basis of the fact that she herself had switched the device on this death was classed as (assisted) suicide.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in Dutch nursing homes: patients' characteristics.

We wished to obtain information about the principal and subsidiary diagnoses, sex, age, marital status, religion and background characteristics of Dutch nursing home patients to whom euthanasia/assisted suicide (EAS) was administered. We performed an exploratory, descriptive, retrospective study involving all Dutch nursing home physicians (NHPs) who in September 1990 were members of the Dutch Association of Nursing Home Physicians (NVVA; n = 713). An anonymous printed questionnaire in two parts was used. Part 1 was intended for all respondents and was expected to give insight into the nature and extent of EAS in Dutch nursing homes. Part 2 was intended only for respondents who had indicated in part 1 that they had administered EAS. They were asked to describe their last case of EAS. The study covered the period from 1986 to mid-1990. There was an 86% response. The respondents described 86 cases of EAS. Sixty-nine of these took place in a nursing home. The majority of patients to whom EAS was administered were suffering from a malignant neoplasm (53%). EAS was administered more often to men than to women. The average age of the patients was 70.9 years. When EAS was administered, the patients on average had been in the nursing home for 13.1 months. Dutch nursing home patients who were given EAS differed in various respects from 'the average nursing home patient'. The principal diagnosis for patients who were given EAS was a malignancy, whereas relatively few physically ill nursing home patients die as a result of a malignancy. The patients to whom EAS was administered were younger and more often male. EAS patients had been in the nursing home for a shorter time than the other somatic (physically disabled) patients who died during the study period.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Care at the end of life or active euthanasia?].

Estimates for the next 50 years indicate that the number of European citizens above 65 will increase from today's 15 - 20 % to 30 - 40 %. In the same period the number of patients suffering from dementia wills more than double. Norway has the largest percentage of beds in nursing facilities per capita in Europe, more than twice that of most European countries. The dramatic decrease in birth rates in most European countries, with women seeking education and employment, will make proper care for the majority of the weakest elderly a major European challenge. Painful and unnecessary treatments violating basic human rights for weak elderly people suffering from dementia are widespread. The unnecessary life-prolonging medical treatment of the dying in acute wards incurs enormous costs. Options for euthanasia or palliative care are much debated poles regarding the terminally ill in Europe. If a European aim is to guarantee the frail old, that means us, dignity in their last years of life, several needs must be met. Resources now used on acute medicine must be shared with long-term care. These necessary changes will require strong medical and ethical involvement from all physicians.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Doctors can kill--active euthanasia in South Africa.

Medical practitioners in South Africa will be given the legal right to end the lives of terminally ill patients. This is the practice of active euthanasia, the procedure whereby a medical doctor or a professional nurse can end the life of a terminally ill patient at the patient's request, by providing or administering a lethal dosage of a drug. Voluntary active euthanasia is included in a Draft Bill--The End of Life Decisions Act--which form part of a report of the South African Law Commission, wherein regulations regarding the end-of-life decisions are formulated. Specifically, it provides that a medical practitioner may under certain conditions stop the treatment of a patient whose life functions are being maintained artificially. Further, that a competent person may refuse life-sustaining treatment if he chooses to die. A medical practitioner may also give effect to a patient's living will in which the patient has requested the cessation of treatment. The Act also provides for the options of active voluntary euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.

Decision Making↗
PubMed1997

[The role of the consulting physician in situations of active euthanasia].

The cases are reported of two patients, a man aged 69 with a metastasized bronchial carcinoma and a woman aged 65 with a frontotemporal glioblastoma no longer responding to irradiation. Both requested active euthanasia. In both cases, euthanasia was performed by injection, after a general practitioner from the same locum group had acted as consultant. The requirements of meticulousness in handling a request for active euthanasia are concerned with the request (which has to be voluntary, thoroughly considered and constant), the suffering (which has to be protracted, unbearable and incurable), consultation and the written report. The consulting or second physician in cases of active euthanasia confirms that the requirements of meticulousness have been met. In addition, the second physician may assist the general practitioner in the detection of factors that may impair correct decision-making by the doctor or the patient. The second physician will be aided in performing these tasks if he is a member of the same locum group as the treating physician. However, if he considers himself too involved, a physician outside the locum group should be available at all times.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Beneficent voluntary active euthanasia: a challenge to professionals caring for terminally ill patients.

Euthanasia has once again become headline news in the UK, with the announcement by Dr Michael Irwin, a former medical director of the United Nations, that he has helped at least 50 people to die, including two between February and July 1997. He has been quoted as saying that his 'conscience is clear' and that the time has come to confront the issue of euthanasia. For the purposes of this article, the term 'beneficient voluntary active euthanasia' (BVAE) will be used: beneficient from the prima facie principle of beneficience, to do good, and voluntary to indicate that this must be carried out at the request of a competent client. This implies adherence to another prima facie principle, that of respect for autonomy. Active implies that something is done or given with the intention of hastening death. The word euthanasia itself simply means 'good death'. This article examines the moral positions of two nurses and one junior doctor towards the subject of BVAE and an attempt is made to represent the main conflicting moral positions. The central arguments against BVAE and counterarguments are presented. The conclusion reached is that consenting adults should not be prevented from availing themselves of BVAE if another consenting adult (a medical doctor) is available and capable of carrying out their wishes. This being the case, it is suggested that BVAE should be available as an option in hospices and in the community. The aims of this article are: to generate debate among professionals; to present a three-way discussion that might be useful as a focus for educational purposes, particularly at undergraduate level; to challenge professionals to confront the issue of euthanasia; and to plead the case of those who request assistance in exercising autonomy by gaining control over their own deaths.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Voluntary active euthanasia and the doctrine of double effect: a view from Germany.

This paper discusses physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and voluntary active euthanasia (VAE), supplies a short history and argues in favour of permitting both once rigid criteria have been set and the cases retro-reviewed. I suggest that among these criteria should be that VAE should only be permitted with one more necessary criterion: that VAE should only be allowed when physician assisted suicide is not a possible option. If the patient is able to ingest and absorb the medication there is no reason why VAE should be permitted. A brief history of VAE and PAS is given and some of the arguments which have been given are analyzed. The Principle of the Double Effect is briefly discussed and why, in my opinion, it is not a valid principle is briefly discussed.

Ethics, Medical↗