SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Meta- analysis”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

PubMed1990

Meta-analysis for the refinement of gerontological nursing research and theory.

A meta-analysis review of literature addresses concerns such as inclusion and exclusion criteria for articles in the meta-analysis and seeks potentially biasing effects of sample size and characteristics, measurement of variables, type of design, and analytic techniques. Whereas the narrative review of literature provides direction by identifying potential variables and relationships of concern, meta-analysis quantifies those relationships by integrating findings and providing explicit direction for research, practice, and theory development. Despite its strengths for quantitatively integrating study results, meta-analysis is time consuming, labor intensive, and may omit other sources such as case studies, historical and qualitative research, and clinical decision making.

Geriatric Nursing↗

PubMed1990

Meta-analysis: its importance in cost-effectiveness studies.

Meta-analysis can be used in cost-effectiveness studies when evidence from several studies is combined to identify which therapies are effective; to estimate the degree of effectiveness between alternative choices; and to estimate cost-related outcomes as part of the costing of therapies and their sequelae. When meta-analysis is performed it is essential that the research protocol include a clear definition of the research question, a description of the studies to be included, inclusion/exclusion criteria for selecting trials, and the methods of trial selection. Issues of bias, and statistical methods and sensitivity analyses used should also be assessed. Meta-analysis, particularly of randomized trials, can provide a rigorous and sound approach to treatment evaluation and should be an integral part of any major cost-effectiveness analysis.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

PubMed1992

Prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of infectious complications including empyema following tube thoracostomy for trauma: results of meta-analysis.

Since 1977, six clinical trials have been performed on the subject of routine antibiotic prophylaxis in patients requiring tube thoracostomy for trauma. No definitive conclusions have been reached regarding the efficacy of antibiotic use in this setting. The results of these clinical trials were pooled to generate an unbiased estimate of the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis for tube thoracostomy using the technique of meta-analysis. Meta-analysis is a statistical method for synthesizing results from separate but similar experiments, grouping them, and comparing each to the null hypothesis. Meta-analysis allows synthesis of all of the available data on antibiotic prophylaxis for tube thoracostomy to resolve the controversy surrounding this issue generated by different but similar clinical studies with conflicting results. Despite different conclusions of value when taken individually, the combined analysis does not support the null hypothesis (no effect of antibiotics). The statistical method is highly significant despite different mechanisms of injury, pathologic findings, and antibiotics employed.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed1985

Meta-analysis: quantitative integration of independent research results.

Meta-analysis, a quantitative method of combining the results of independent research studies, is described as a method for reviewing research literature. Four steps are taken to summarize the research in an area. First, a thorough literature review is conducted to identify a group of research studies with the relevant treatment variable. Second, an effect size is calculated for each study. Third, an overall (composite) effect size is determined by a weighted combination of the obtained effect sizes. Fourth, a fail-safe N (the number of unpublished studies with opposing conclusions needed to negate the published literature) is calculated to assess the certainty of the overall effect size. Meta-analysis was applied to 33 studies of chymopapain in an illustrative example. The analysis produced a large effect size of 0.8082 and a fail-safe N of 214, indicating strong support for the effectiveness of the treatment with chymopapain. Meta-analysis can be a useful tool if it is used properly. It is particularly useful as an adjunct to other methods of review that are used in pharmacy practice.

Chymopapain↗

PubMed1986

16PF research into addiction: meta-analysis and extension.

Meta-analysis of 34 studies on Cattell's 16PF test reveals ragged egos (C-), guilt (O), distrust (L), frustration (Q4), alienation (G-), vague identity (Q3-), alarm (H-), resentment (Q1), quasi-autism (M), scattered intellect (B-), grandiosity (E), autonomy (Q2), infantilism (I), avoidance (A-), and deviousness (N). The aberrant scores on E, G, I, Q1, and Q2 discriminate addicts from suicidals and the chronically ill or unemployed. We found nine types of addicts in our developmental study of 83 members of Alcoholics Anonymous. On the more stable second-order 16PF factors, 43% were highest on Autonomous, 37% on Desperate, 16% on Tough Poise, and 4% on Extravert. Profiles differed more by sexual preference than by gender. Recidivism was highest among homosexual men (38%) and the desperate (25%). Only the Fourth and Fifth Steps of the AA program seem crucial to recovery. Treatment programs based on these and tailored to sexual preference and the second-order personality types seem highly advisable.

Adult↗

PubMed1989

Meta-analysis in medical research: strong encouragement for higher quality in individual research efforts.

In this article, we counter some criticism regarding the desirability of performing meta-analysis in clinical research. These criticisms, we argue, are based mainly on current difficulties in deriving firm conclusions based on meta-analysis, resulting from poor methodology and reporting of primary studies. This is not a fault of meta-analysis. In fact, with a better understanding of meta-analysis in the context of the full scientific research process, meta-analysis is seen as a key element for improving individual research efforts and their reporting in the literature. This in turn will further enhance the role of meta-analysis in helping clinicians and policy makers answer clinical questions.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Comparing the Efficacy of Mechanochemical Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Treating Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence. METHODS: Online databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing MOCA and RFA in the treatment of varicose veins in lower extremities from database inception to October 2025. Primary outcome was anatomic success. Secondary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS), Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire score (AVVQ), and complications. Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. Subsequent analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: A total of four RCTs, one cohort study and retrospective cross-sectional study involving 737 patients (380 MOCA patients and 357 RFA patients) were included. The meta-analysis results showed that the RFA group was significantly better than the MOCA group in short term and long term of anatomical success rate [(odds ratio [OR] = 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] (0.20, 0.71), P = 0.003), (OR = 0.17, 95% CI (0.06, 0.45), P = 0.0003)], but patients in the MOCA group had significantly lower perioperative period pain (mean difference [MD] = -4.48, 95% CI (-7.58, -1.37), P = 0.005] and required fewer days to return to normal activities (MD = -0.76, 95% CI, (-0.95, -0.57), P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in minor and major complications [(OR = 0.93, 95% CI (0.66, 1.33), P = 0.70), (OR = 1.30, 95% CI (0.32, 5.28), P = 0.72)] or quality of life scores (MD = -0.45, 95% CI (-2.53 to 1.63), P = 0.67). CONCLUSION: MOCA of GSV incompetence is an effective and safe method. Compared with RFA, it has lower postoperative pain score and faster recovery time. However, the anatomical success rates were significantly lower with MOCA than with RFA. Therefore, long-term follow-up to evaluate the impact on clinical results is required.

Humans↗

PubMed1992

Distal spleno-renal shunt versus endoscopic sclerotherapy in the prevention of variceal rebleeding. A meta-analysis of 4 randomized clinical trials.

Meta-analysis was used to evaluate 4 clinical trials comparing distal spleno-renal shunt (DSRS) with endoscopic sclerotherapy (EVS) in the prevention of variceal rebleeding: the interval between bleeding and therapy ranges from < 14 days to > 100 days. A questionnaire was sent to each author of the published trials concerning methods, definitions and results of the trials in order to obtain more detailed and up-to-date information. The selected end-points for the meta-analysis were: rebleeding, mortality and chronic encephalopathy. Analysis of the results in the questionnaires was made using the method proposed by Collins. The pooled relative risk (i.e. the combined Odds ratio of each trial as an estimate of overall efficacy) of rebleeding was statistically reduced by DSRS (0.16; 95% confidence interval 0.10-0.27). Despite this, the overall risk of death following DSRS was only marginally decreased (0.78; 95% confidence interval 0.47-1.29); the lack of homogeneity in the results does not permit any significant conclusions on this end-point. However, in non-alcoholic patients, the decrease in risk of death was greater, and this without heterogeneity, following DSRS than EVS (0.59; 95% confidence interval 0.23-1.50). The overall risk of chronic encephalopathy was slightly increased after DSRS (1.86; 95% confidence interval 0.90-3.86). In conclusion, DSRS significantly reduced the risk of rebleeding compared to EVS without increasing the risk of chronic hepatic encephalopathy. However, DSRS did not significantly affect the overall death risk. Only in non-alcoholic disease did it seem to show an advantage over EVS.

Brain Diseases↗

PubMed2026

Ventriculostomy-Related Infections by Country-Income Level: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Hierarchical Meta-analysis.

Our objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature on ventriculostomy-related infection (VRI) and evaluate temporal and global trends. We conducted a systematic review and Bayesian hierarchical random-effects meta-analysis of VRI rates in adults, stratified by country-income level (high-income countries [HIC]; low- or middle-income countries [LMIC]), study design, sample size, enrollment period, VRI intervention, and VRI definition. We identified 159 articles published between 1989 and 2025 that included 523,704 patients with 7293 VRIs. The pooled VRI rate was 8.64% [95% CI: 7.44-9.97], with moderate heterogeneity and good model fit. The leave-one-out sensitivity analysis showed a mean absolute change of 0.06% and a maximum change of 0.2%, indicating robust analysis. Five of the 33 represented countries had VRI rates below the global pooled rate of 8.64%. Four were HICs: Singapore (VRI rate 3.3% [0.8-7]), the United States (VRI rate 4.6% [3.4-5.9]), Germany (VRI rate 6.1% [1.1-18.9]), Norway (8.3% [0.3-68.4]), with 1 LMIC: China (8.5% [5.4-12.4]). VRI was significantly higher in studies using definitions beyond CSF culture alone for VRI (+3.16% [0.11- 6.52]) and in those from Europe (+7.29% [4.62-10.10]) and the Western Pacific (+4.09% [1.55-6.98]). No other subgroup demonstrated significant differences. This Bayesian meta-analysis provides global estimates and factors associated with VRI. Standardization of VRI definitions is critical for future benchmarking of VRI rates.

Humans↗

PubMed1989

Meta-analysis: science or religion?

Meta-analysis of clinical trials has assumed increasing importance in recent years as a means of reaching conclusions regarding the safety and efficacy of treatments evaluated in individual trials. This article discusses impediments to meta-analyses and enumerates needs that should be satisfied to enhance their usefulness. Key among the needs are improved means of identifying trials prior to publication via prospective registration of them and vocabulary and nomenclature for identifying reports of meta-analyses in the published literature.

Meta-Analysis as Topic↗

PubMed1988

Inborn/outborn status and neonatal survival: a meta-analysis of non-randomized studies.

We have applied meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between birth place and the likelihood of neonatal survival, for infants of low birth weight (less than 2501 grams) in a series of 19 non-randomized studies. This paper illustrates the utility meta-analysis in evaluating medical technologies described in non-randomized studies, if proper attention is given to biases in those studies. The results of this meta-analysis show strong preferences for inborn status, especially for infants who weigh 1001-2000 grams. For infants of lower or higher birth weight (that is, less than 1001 or greater than 2000 grams), the studies are inconsistent: some favour inborn status while others favour outborn status. This heterogeneity is not surprising, because selection bias is more problematic in studies of infants at these birth weights. We discuss potential causes of and solutions to selection bias and illustrate its potential magnitude by introducing the bias factor, which should be considered in the design of future studies. When selection bias cannot be ruled out, the results shown for those who weigh 1001-2000 grams are more appropriate for generating valid conclusions and subsequent policies regarding birth place preference for low birth weight infants.

Birth Weight↗

PubMed2026

Effectiveness of artificial intelligence in nursing simulation education: A systematic review, meta-analysis and bibliometric visualization analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To synthesize the roles and core functions of AI in nursing simulation education for nursing students via systematic review, quantitatively evaluate its effects on students' knowledge and skill outcomes through meta-analysis, and map the research landscape and development trends of this field through bibliometric visualization analysis. DESIGN: Systematic review, meta-analysis and bibliometric visualization analysis. DATA SOURCES: Eight electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, ERIC, Academic Search Complete, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) were employed to search studies from the time of construction to 16 December 2025. REVIEW METHODS: Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were screened. The revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (ROB 2) and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklists were used for quality assessment. Meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.4, and bibliometric visualization analysis was conducted using VOSviewer 1.6.20 and Bibliometrix (based on R4.4.3). RESULTS: A total of 61 studies were included. AI primarily played two roles in nursing simulation education: peer-type new subject (n = 24) and direct mediator (n = 22). Meta-analysis showed that AI interventions significantly improved nursing students' knowledge (SMD = 1.49, 95% CI [0.55,2.43], p = 0.002) and skills (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI [0.02,1.31], p = 0.04). Bibliometric analysis identified that the United States of America and China were the two main contributing countries in this field, and the key motor themes included generative artificial intelligence, virtual patients, and geriatric care. CONCLUSIONS: AI exerts positive effects on nursing students' knowledge acquisition and skill enhancement in simulation education, with peer-type new subject and direct mediator as the dominant roles. Future research should focus on expanding AI applications in multi-specialty simulation scenarios, activating the data-driven value of machine learning, and strengthening international collaboration and standardization construction, so as to promote the sustainable development of AI-integrated nursing simulation education.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

In Vitro comparison of herbal and conventional antifungals against Candida strains in Oral candidiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the in vitro antifungal activity of herbal and conventional antifungals against Candida strains. DESIGN: In vitro studies were identified through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science up until May 2026. This review is registered with Prospero (CRD420251128404). Eligibility was determined using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) framework, with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria focused on in vitro antifungal investigations comparing herbal antifungals with conventional antifungals. The risk of bias was assessed using the modified Quality Assessment Tool for In Vitro Studies (QUIN Tool). A meta-analysis was performed, with the primary outcome measure being the ratio of means (RoM). RESULTS: The systematic review included twenty-five articles. Most studies showed different results in inhibition zones or minimum inhibitory concentrations between herbal and conventional agents. The meta-analysis indicates that certain herbal antifungals are equally effective as or more effective than conventional antifungals against Candida dubliniensis, Candida lusitaniae, and Candida tropicalis. While the efficacy of herbal antifungals for Candida albicans and Candida glabrata was modest, Piper betle L. demonstrated significant inhibitory potential. In contrast, conventional antifungals outperformed herbal antifungals against Candida krusei and Candida parapsilosis. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis highlight herbal medicine as a potential antifungal therapy for oral candidiasis, emphasizing the need for new strategies due to resistance to conventional antifungals.

Humans↗

PubMed1992

Platelet monoamine oxidase in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.

We did a meta-analysis on all publications (English and other languages) concerned with platelet monoamine oxidase (MAO) in schizophrenia. Essentially, when patients were medicated with a neuroleptic, most studies found that schizophrenics had lower platelet MAO levels than controls. Administration of neuroleptic lowers MAO levels. MAO levels in drug-free schizophrenics were similar to controls. Only a minority of studies found drug-free schizophrenics had decreased platelet MAO levels.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Does treatment with essential amino acids and hypertonic glucose improve survival in acute renal failure?: A meta-analysis.

We performed a meta-analysis of four randomized trials (RCTs) and one concurrent control study which addressed the following question: Does treatment with amino acid solutions and hypertonic glucose improve survival of seriously ill patients with acute renal failure who are unable to take oral or enteral feedings? Three RCTs compared outcomes with essential amino acid solutions (EAA) and hypertonic glucose against hypertonic glucose alone, and their results were pooled. Use of EAA was associated with an absolute increase in initial survival of 0.24 as compared to glucose (confidence interval: +.015 to +.446). Without weighting the data to reflect the quality of the RCTs, this effect was significant (p = .017). Patients needing dialysis showed a significant treatment effect (p = .015), while those not requiring dialysis did not (p = .11). However, survival to hospital discharge was not significantly improved for the patient population as a whole (p = .10). Using a standardized quality assessment protocol, the four RCTs received scores ranging from .188 to .357 out of a possible 1.00. Any statistically significant treatment effects were abolished by factoring the quality scores of the studies into the data-pooling process. Sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the effect of including the nonrandomized study. Although it had more patients than the other studies combined, the nonrandomized study was of low quality (score: .032) and its inclusion did not change the outcome of data pooling once quality weighting was applied. We conclude that the efficacy of these parenteral nutritional regimens remains uncertain in this clinical setting.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Pain interventions with children: a meta-analysis of research.

A meta-analysis of 27 studies on pain management interventions with children was conducted using two decades of research reported in five disciplines. One-fifth of these studies were in the nursing literature and 78% were published since 1979. Two complementary methods of calculating the effectiveness of pain management interventions were used for each of three outcome categories. Fisher's Combined test procedure was used to combine the results of the independent studies, to determine if a significant relationship existed between pain management programs and children's response. An overall effect size (r) was also calculated. Significant relationships of small magnitude were found between pain management interventions and child's response for behavioral (r = .41, chi 2 = 181.97, p less than .0001), self-report (r = .34, chi 2 = 122.06, p less than .0001), and physiologic (r = .30, chi 2 = 88.29, p less than .0001) measures.

Child↗

PubMed2026

Reassessment of the effect of oral l-arginine on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of oral l-arginine supplementation on ambulatory blood pressure (ABP). METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted from their inception through March 1, 2026. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of oral l-arginine intervention were included. Outcome measures included 24-h systolic blood pressure (24h SBP), 24-h diastolic blood pressure (24h DBP), daytime systolic blood pressure (dSBP), daytime diastolic blood pressure (dDBP), nighttime systolic blood pressure (nSBP), and nighttime diastolic blood pressure (nDBP). Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0. The weighted mean difference (WMD) was used as the effect size, and the results were pooled with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 5 RCTs comprising 202 participants were included. Meta-analysis results demonstrated that oral l-arginine significantly reduced 24h SBP (WMD = -4.23 mmHg, 95% CI [-5.87, -2.58]; P < 0.01) and 24h DBP (WMD = -3.04 mmHg, 95% CI [-4.48, -1.59]; P < 0.01). Significant reductions were also observed for dSBP (WMD = -4.16 mmHg, 95% CI [-5.90, -2.41]; P < 0.01) and dDBP (WMD = -4.25 mmHg, 95% CI [-5.85, -2.66]; P < 0.01). Furthermore, oral l-arginine significantly lowered nSBP (WMD = -5.70 mmHg, 95% CI [-7.81, -3.58]; P < 0.01) and nDBP (WMD = -4.18 mmHg, 95% CI [-6.27, -2.09]; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Oral l-arginine supplementation significantly reduces ABP. However, the number of included studies was limited, and further validation through additional relevant research is warranted.

Arginine↗

PubMed1991

Using meta-analysis in psychiatric research.

Meta-analysis is a technique for summarizing the results of many studies which can allow reviewers in a particular field to arrive at a synthesis of the various findings in a more objective manner than relying on expert opinion and combine the results of these studies to arrive at an overall estimate of the magnitude of the effect of a treatment, to determine if the evidence favours its effectiveness. The technique consists of determining an effect size or odds ratio for each study and combining them, taking into account the fact that studies with large samples should exert more influence than those with small samples. However, the procedure is not mechanical. The reviewer must make a series of decisions regarding the studies to be included or excluded, the weight to place on the methodological rigour of the trials, the results from each study to be used, how to handle differences in the magnitude of the results across studies, how to derive the best overall estimate of the effect across studies, and how to determine the precision of that estimate. Each of these decisions can affect both the quality of the review and the nature of the findings.

Humans↗