SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Proteinuria and progressive glomerulosclerosis are commonly associated with nephron loss. We studied the pathogenesis of these lesions by examining the role of changes in specific glomerular capillary wall permeability properties in uninephrectomized rats. The development of altered capillary permselectivity to macromolecules and loss of glomerular basement membrane anionic charge were measured by the dextran fractional clearance and ferritin tracer probe methods, respectively. In addition, the protective effect of dietary protein restriction and an angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitor (captopril) were studied in eight groups of male Sprague-Dawley rats. Four groups of rats underwent sham-nephrectomy or left nephrectomy and were fed an 8.5% protein diet (sham-nephrectomy and low protein, nephrectomy and low protein) or a 30% protein diet, respectively (sham-nephrectomy and high protein, nephrectomy a high protein). Four other groups of rats underwent sham-nephrectomy or left nephrectomy and were treated with captopril (50 mg/kg/day) while receiving a 8.5% protein diet (sham-nephrectomy, low protein and captopril, nephrectomy, low protein and captopril) or a 30% protein diet, respectively (sham-nephrectomy, high protein and captopril, nephrectomy, high protein and captopril). Rats were nephrectomized at 21 days of age and were functionally tested and sacrificed at 7 months of age. The nephrectomy and high protein rats had significantly greater proteinuria and higher fractional clearance of neutral dextrans in the 30 to 42 A range compared with that of sham-nephrectomy and high protein, nephrectomy and low protein, and nephrectomy, high protein and captopril rats. The nephrectomy and high protein rats also had a significantly lower labeling of the glomerular basement membrane with cationic ferritin tracer molecules compared with the nephrectomy and low protein and nephrectomy, high protein and captopril rats. Of the eight treatment groups, the nephrectomy and high protein rats had the most severe glomerular lesions. In general, nephrectomized rats fed low dietary protein and nephrectomized rats treated with captopril had significantly less proteinuria, glomerular lesions, and milder changes in the glomerular capillary wall porosity and glomerular basement membrane anionic charge.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
PURPOSE: For proper indications at university hospitals laparoscopic nephrectomy is often considered the standard of care. At community hospitals past surveys have not demonstrated this change. We describe the changing practice patterns of performing laparoscopic nephrectomies in indicated patients at our community hospital. We reviewed our data on monitoring our training program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of 381 consecutive complete nephrectomies performed at our institution from February 2000 to December 2003, including 62 live donor nephrectomies. Patient age, pathological size, operative time, estimated blood loss, duration to solid food intake and duration of hospitalization were compared between open nephrectomy and laparoscopic nephrectomy groups using the Wilcoxon 2-sample test. Surgical practice and surgeon characteristics were also described. RESULTS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy demonstrated superior postoperative recovery with earlier return to solid diet and shorter hospitalization. The 2 groups were similar in regard to major complication rates. The number of laparoscopic nephrectomies increased annually, while the number of open nephrectomies decreased. The number of laparoscopic urologists increased annually. More importantly laparoscopic urologists performed an increasing number of nephrectomies, while nonlaparoscopic urologists faced a decrease in the number of nephrectomies performed. There appeared to be little evidence of hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy as a bridge to learning standard laparoscopic nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Our training paradigm has safely and effectively trained community urologists to perform laparoscopic nephrectomies. Laparoscopic nephrectomy is now considered a standard treatment option along with conventional open surgery and it should be offered to the patient in the medical setting. Although fellowship trained urologists can certainly add expertise to any program, community based hospitals do not have to depend on them.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We present and review a single center experience with laparoscopic renal surgery for renal cancer including laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During the period September 2002 - January 2005, 180 patients underwent laparoscopic renal surgery at our center for several indications. A total of 121 patients underwent radical nephrectomy (76) or partial nephrectomy (45) for solid renal tumors. Their data was recorded and analyzed including age, indication for surgery, operative time, blood loss, intra- and postoperative complications, conversion rates, histological results and outpatient follow-up. RESULTS: The mean age at surgery was 65 years (range: 21-89 years). The indications for surgery were solid, enhancing renal masses. For tumors larger than 4 cm, a radical nephrectomy was performed. Tumors that were smaller than 4 cm were removed by partial nephrectomy. The mean operative time was minutes (range: 70-280 minutes) and the mean blood loss was 220 cc (range: 30-700 cc). The mean blood loss was significantly lower in the radical nephrectomy group (120 cc) than in the partial nephrectomy group (320 cc). In eight patients major intraoperative complications were noted including injury of the hilar vessels (5 cases), inferior vena cava (1 case), large bowel and spleen (one patient) and duodenum (1 case). Conversion to open surgery was needed in nine patients (7.4%), four in the radical nephrectomy and five in the partial nephrectomy group. Major postoperative complications were recorded in two patients who underwent radical nephrectomy (pneumothorax and incarcerated inguinal hernia) and in two patients who underwent partial nephrectomy (urine leakage). The pathological examination demonstrated renal cell carcinoma in 109 cases, oncocytoma in 6 cases, angiomyolipoma in 2 cases, sarcoma of the kidney and metastasis from lung cancer in one case each and a hemorrhagic cyst in one case. In all patients who underwent radical nephrectomy negative surgical margins were obtained, in three patients after partial nephrectomy the surgical margins were focally involved by tumor. The mean tumor size was 5.1 cm and 3.1 cm after radical or partial nephrectomy respectively. During follow-up, none of the patients developed local or distant recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach to kidney cancer seems to be safe and oncologically sound. The low morbidity rate together with the inherent advantages of laparoscopic surgery make this approach attractive and we believe it should be considered the new standard of care for renal cancer.
OBJECTIVES: Partial nephrectomy is perceived to be more technically demanding than radical nephrectomy; concurrently, the increasing incidence of small renal tumors has suggested a greater role for nephron-sparing techniques. From a quality-of-care perspective, the underuse of partial nephrectomy may represent suboptimal delivery of healthcare. METHODS: A total of 66,621 subjects undergoing radical and partial nephrectomy for kidney cancer between 1988 and 2002 were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, a nationally representative data set of hospital discharges. Adjusted models were developed to identify clinical factors and structural measures independently associated with the use of partial nephrectomy. RESULTS: Overall, 7.5% of patients treated underwent partial nephrectomy. The utilization rates for partial nephrectomy ranged from 0.21 cases per 100,000 U.S. residents in 1988 to 1.6 cases per 100,000 U.S. residents in 2002. The percentage of patients with renal cell carcinoma treated with partial nephrectomy has increased more than threefold during the study interval (3.7% in 1988 to 1990 compared with 12.3% in 2000 to 2002, P <0.0001 for trend). Patients treated at urban (odds ratio 1.1), teaching (odds ratio 1.3), and high nephrectomy volume (odds ratio 2.5) hospitals were more likely to undergo partial nephrectomy (each, P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The national use of partial nephrectomy has increased but remains lower than expected in certain settings, suggesting underuse or selective referral. Subjects with kidney cancer are more likely to be treated with partial nephrectomy at teaching institutions with high surgical volumes. The practice patterns of physicians at institutions more commonly using partial nephrectomy may reflect a better quality of care, although additional work in delineating the disparate utilization rates is warranted.
BACKGROUND: Initial management of solid organ injuries in hemodynamically stable patients is nonoperative. Therefore, early identification of those injuries likely to require surgical intervention is key. We sought to identify factors predictive of the need for nephrectomy after trauma. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of renal injuries admitted over a 12-year period to a Level I trauma center. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients (73% male) sustained a kidney injury (mean age, 27 +/- 16; mean Injury Severity Score, 13 +/- 10). Of the 72 blunt trauma patients, 5 patients (7%) underwent urgent nephrectomy, 3 (4%) had repair and/or stenting, and 89% were observed despite a 29% laparotomy rate for associated intraabdominal injuries in this group. Twenty-five patients with penetrating trauma underwent eight nephrectomies (31%), one partial nephrectomy, and two renal repairs. Regardless of the mechanism of injury, patients requiring nephrectomy were in shock, had a higher 24-hour transfusion requirement, and were more likely to have a high-grade renal laceration (all p < 0.05). Bluntly injured patients requiring nephrectomy had more concurrent intraabdominal injuries (p < 0.0001). Overall, patients after penetrating trauma were more severely injured, had higher 24-hour transfusion requirements, and a higher nephrectomy rate (all p < 0.05). Despite a higher injury severity in the penetrating group, however, mortality was higher in the bluntly injured group (p < 0.0001). Univariate predictors for nephrectomy included: revised trauma score, injury severity score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, shock on presentation, renal injury grade, and 24-hour transfusion requirement. No patient with a mild or moderate renal injury required nephrectomy, whereas 6 of 12 (50%) grade 4 injuries and 7 of 8 (88%) grade 5 injuries required nephrectomy. Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed penetrating injury, renal injury grade, and Glasgow Coma Scale score as predictive of nephrectomy. CONCLUSION: Overall, injury severity, severity of renal injury grade, hemodynamic instability, and transfusion requirements are predictive of nephrectomy after both blunt and penetrating trauma. Nephrectomy is more likely after penetrating injury.
BACKGROUND: Some patients develop proteinuria and progressive renal failure after unilateral nephrectomy, although the majority of patients maintain normal renal function. Reasons to explain this different evolution are not known. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in 73 patients who had undergone unilateral nephrectomy 13.6 +/- 8.6 years before. Patients with morphologic abnormalities in the remaining kidney, systemic disorders, or abnormal renal function at the time of nephrectomy were excluded. All of the 73 included patients showed normal renal function and negative proteinuria at nephrectomy. The patient's medical records were reviewed, and clinical and analytical data throughout follow-up were obtained. RESULTS: Fifty-three out of the 73 patients (group I) showed a normal renal function and negative proteinuria at the cross-sectional study. The remaining 20 patients (group II) showed proteinuria (3.4 +/- 3.1 g/day). The time elapsed between nephrectomy and proteinuria appearance was 10.1 +/- 6.1 years. Thirteen patients of group II had developed renal insufficiency (serum creatinine at the cross-sectional study of 3.9 + 3.2 mg/dL) in addition to proteinuria. The time elapsed between proteinuria appearance and the onset of renal insufficiency was 4.1 +/- 4.3 years. Renal insufficiency showed a slowly progressive course in most of these patients. There were no significant differences between group I and group II patients in age, gender, renal function, or blood pressure at the time of nephrectomy. In contrast, group II patients showed a body mass index (BMI) that was significantly higher than group I at nephrectomy (31.6 +/- 5.6 vs. 24.3 +/- 3.7 kg/m(2), P < 0.001), at cross-sectional study (33.3 +/- 6.6 vs. 25.1 +/- 3.5 kg/m(2), P < 0.001), and throughout follow-up. Among the 14 obese (BMI > 30 kg/m(2)) patients at the time of nephrectomy, 13 (92%) developed proteinuria/renal insufficiency. In contrast, among the 59 patients with BMI < 30 kg/m(2), only 7 (12%) developed these complications (P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier estimated probability of negative proteinuria and normal renal function 10 years after nephrectomy was 40 and 70%, respectively, in obese patients at nephrectomy. At 20 years after nephrectomy, these percentages were 8 and 35%, respectively. In contrast, in nonobese patients, the probability of negative proteinuria and normal renal function was 93 and 98%, respectively, at 10 years (P < 0.001) and 77 and 91%, respectively, at 20 years (P < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the risk of developing renal disease was only statistically correlated with BMI at the time of unilateral nephrectomy (odds ratio 1.34, 1.03 to 1.76 CI). CONCLUSIONS: Obese patients are at risk for developing proteinuria and chronic renal failure after unilateral nephrectomy. Regular and long-term follow-up are recommended in these patients.
OBJECTIVES: We report the results from a nonrandomized comparison of open flank versus laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with benign renal disease. METHODS: From January 1993 to December 1997, 249 nephrectomies for benign renal disease were performed at our institution. There were 118 patients in the open flank nephrectomy group (median age 58.5, range 8-89 years) and 131 patients in the laparoscopic nephrectomy group (median age 40, range 16-73 years). Clinical parameters such as operative times, blood loss, transfusion rates, conversion and complication rates, start of oral intake, analgesic consumption, duration of hospitalization and convalescence and short-term mortality were compared among both groups. RESULTS: Median operative time in the open flank nephrectomy group was 90 (range 30-240) min and also 90 (range 41-210) min in the laparoscopic nephrectomy group. In the laparoscopy group 8 patients were converted to open surgery (6.1%). There were 27 complications (20.6%) in the laparoscopic nephrectomy group compared to 30 complications (25.4%) in the open flank nephrectomy group. Postoperatively, patients in the laparoscopic nephrectomy group required less morphine sulfate equivalent (12 vs. 20 mg) for pain control and they had a shorter hospital stay (4 vs. 10 days) and convalescence (24 vs. 36 days). The postoperative parameters are given as medians and reached statistically significant differences in favor of laparoscopic nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nephrectomy results in a significantly briefer postoperative course when compared to open flank nephrectomy. As a matter of fact laparoscopy in urology is still a center-related procedure and even in these centers only a minority of urologists practice laparoscopy. However, in experienced centers the laparoscopic technique should be offered to patients with benign renal disease who are scheduled for elective nephrectomy.
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has been shown to be less morbid than traditional open radical nephrectomy. The long-term oncological effectiveness of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy remains to be established. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At 3 centers patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy before November 1, 1996 with pathologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma were identified. A representative group of patients undergoing open radical nephrectomy for clinical T1, T2 lesions was also identified. Staging, operative details and postoperative course were reviewed. Followup consisted of review of clinical, laboratory and radiological records. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed. RESULTS: The study included 64 patients treated with laparoscopic and 69 treated with open radical nephrectomy with respective average ages of 60.6 and 61.3 years at surgery. On preoperative imaging open lesions were larger (6.2 cm., range 2.5 to 15) than laparoscopic radical nephrectomy lesions (4.3 cm., range 2 to 10, p <0.001). Pathology reports revealed no difference in specimen weight (425 and 495 gm., p = 0.146) or average Fuhrman grade (1.88 and 1.78, p = 0.476) between laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy, respectively. Median followup was 54 months (range 0 to 94) for laparoscopic and 69 months (range 8 to 114) for open radical nephrectomy. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log rank comparison revealed 5-year recurrence-free survival of 92% and 91% for laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy, respectively (p = 0.583). At 5 years cancer specific survival was 98% and 92% (p = 0.124), and nonspecific survival was 81% and 89% (p = 0.260) for laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy confers long-term oncological effectiveness equivalent to traditional open radical nephrectomy.
BACKGROUND: Nephrectomy in patients with polycystic kidney disease (PKD) is indicated in cases of hematuria, pain, hypertension, infections or before a renal transplant. The purpose of this study is to report our results of this procedure during a contemporary period of time in patients with PKD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study consists on a retrospective of files from patients with PKD, including all cases with unilateral or bilateral nephrectomy. We analyzed general data and compared the results from the surgical procedure between bilateral nephrectomy, unilateral nephrectomy and 2 staged bilateral nephrectomy. RESULTS: A total of 14 PKD patients treated with nephrectomy where gathered. Mean patient age was 46 years; 78.5% has chronic renal insufficiency treated with dialysis. The decision of surgery was based predominantly on the presence of two or more symptoms. A total of 24 procedures where done; 7 patients with simultaneous bilateral nephrectomy, 3 with bilateral nephrectomy done in 2 different stages and 4 patients with unilateral nephrectomy. Good operative results where observed with minimal complications. Bilateral simultaneous nephrectomy was completed in a longer time interval than unilateral procedure (255 vs. 195 min, p = 0.008) and with a slight more bleeding (775 vs. 400cc, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Open nephrectomy remains as the standard procedure for patients with polycystic kidney disease (PKD). Although minimal operative differences where seen between unilateral or bilateral 2 stage nephrectomy and bilateral simultaneous nephrectomy, the overall morbidity was similar between procedures.