DIAGNOSIS OF ADHESIVE CONSTRICTIVE PERICARDITIS.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Tuberculous constrictive pericarditis is a rare condition with a high mortality rate. The coexistence of constrictive pericarditis and intracardiac tuberculoma has not previously been reported. We report the case of a 65-year-old man presenting with left-side pleural effusion and signs of systemic venous congestion for 2 months. Echocardiography and computerized tomography showed a thickened pericardium and a mass in the right atrium. Pericardiectomy and excision of the right atrial mass were performed. Pathologic examination of the pericardium and the right atrial mass both revealed chronic granulomatous inflammation with acid-fast bacilli and confirmed the diagnosis of tuberculous constrictive pericarditis and right atrial tuberculoma. This case reminds us of the possibility of this type of rare combination of tuberculous constrictive pericarditis and intracardiac right atrial tuberculoma, and the need for complete imaging studies when such cases are encountered.
Since extensive studies of constrictive pericarditis by CT have not been reported, we performed a plain and contrast enhanced CT on 4 patients of constrictive pericarditis diagnosed by cardiac catheterization or echocardiography and confirmed at the time of surgical operation. The CT findings were as follows: The normal pericardium was smooth, could be visualized in the right and anterior regions of the heart, and was approximately or less 2 mm in thickness. On the other hand, the pericardium in constrictive pericarditis was irregularly thickened, was visualized even in the left and posterior regions of the heart, and was more than 2 mm in thickness. The mean CT value of the pericardium in constrictive pericarditis was significantly increased as compared with that of the normal pericardium. The contrast enhanced CT image revealed a marked dilatation of superior and inferior caval veins (SVC and IVC) even in the cases with normal size of each cardiac chamber. The ECG gated CT performed on one case demonstrated the impaired ventricular expansion. After pericardiectomy, the ventricular chambers showed a tendency to dilate, and the dimension of the SVC and IVC were reduced. Thus, CT is thought to be a useful noninvasive technique in evaluating the thickness of the pericardium, its pathology and the degree of dilatation in each cardiac chamber or the vena cavae.
A pericardial knock is a common finding in constrictive pericarditis. However, its origin has been uncertain. One hypothesis suggests that it is due to sudden deceleration of ventricular filling. To validate this hypothesis, left ventriculograms, phonocardiograms and external pulse recordings were obtained in seven patients with hemodynamic and pathologic findings of constrictive pericarditis and in seven normal subjects. Left ventriculographic silhouettes were digitized and left ventricular volumes were calculated by computer at 16 ms intervals. Curves of left ventricular volume versus diastolic filling time were constructed for each patient. Pericardial knock was recognized as an early high frequency sound recorded between 90 to 120 ms after the aortic closing sound and occurring at the trough of the Y descent of the jugular venous pressure tracing. The timing of the pericardial knock in five patients with constrictive pericarditis corresponded to a sudden and premature plateau of the diastolic left ventricular volume curve representing 85 +/- 4 percent (mean +/- standard deviation) of ventricular filling. The diastolic plateau was missing in two patients with constrictive pericarditis who had no pericardial knock. In these cases, the rate of ventricular filling was faster than normal in the first 20 percent of diastole. Thus, this study related pericardial knock to an abrupt plateau inthe diastolic left ventricular volume curve, supporting the view that sudden cessatin of ventricular filling generates the pericardial knock of constrictive pericarditis. Two mechanisms are proposed by which the filling plateau may produce the knock, and it is postulated that both ventricles may participate in the knock phenomenon.
Constrictive pericarditis is a well defined clinical entity, traditionally secondary to longstanding tuberculosis. Although posttraumatic constrictive pericarditis, due to haemopericardium, is well known during the postoperative period following cardiac surgery, it is underestimated in closed chest trauma. A new case of constrictive pericarditis is reported, due to neglected chest trauma. The discussion emphasizes the need for early diagnosis and surgical treatment, which determine the general prognosis of pericardial constriction. This implies systematic investigation of all cases of chest trauma, even minor, by transthoracic, or preferable, transoesophageal echocardiography, looking for haemopericardium.
Constrictive pericarditis is an uncommon condition. Previously, tuberculosis or other bacterial infections were prevalent causes, often with prominent pericardial calcification. Presently, many patients with constrictive pericarditis of other aetiologies have lesser degrees of structural changes in the pericardium. We report on a case with severe symptoms where the correct diagnosis was elusive because of absent or minimal preoperative pericardial pathology. The clinical, echocardiographic and haemodynamic features of constrictive pericarditis are reviewed. We recommend thorough echocardiographic evaluation of central haemodynamics in patients with symptoms of heart failure when the aetiology is not readily apparent (e.g. previous myocardial infarction dilated cardiomyopathy or valvular disease.
Twenty-seven cases of chronic constrictive pericarditis seen between 1975 and 1990 in an internal medicine department were analyzed retrospectively. The chronic pericarditis was consecutive to one (n = 5) or several (n = 7) episodes of acute pericarditis. Echography demonstrated the presence of pericardial effusion in 74 percent of the cases, pericardial thickening in 41 percent and/or compression of right heart cavities in 55 percent. Computerized tomography of the chest, performed in 16 cases, showed pericardial effusion in 63 percent of the cases, pericardial thickening in 37 percent and lymph node enlargement in 19 percent. Magnetic resonance imaging of the chest was carried out in 2 patients but showed no abnormality. All 11 patients who underwent cardiac catheterization were found to be adiastolic. The cause of constrictive pericarditis, elicited in 13 patients was neoplasia in 4, sequelae of radiotherapy in 2, injuries in 2, mediastinal and retroperitoneal fibrosis in 2, myocardial infarction in 1, purulent pericarditis in 1 and bacteriologically proven tuberculosis in 1. Medical treatment with corticosteroids (n = 16) and/or antituberculous therapy (n = 15) was successful in 2 patients; 25 patients had to undergo surgery 7 +/- 11 months after constriction was diagnosed. Pericardial drainage (through a pericardiopleural window in 4 cases) proved to be sufficient in 10/15 patients but failed in 5. Pericardectomy was performed initially in 3 cases and after failure of medical treatment and/or drainage in 11 cases. The 4 patients with neoplastic constrictive pericarditis died 10 months on average after the diagnosis, but the remaining 23 patients were alive after à 9 to 48 months (mean: 19 +/- 15) follow-up. These results suggest that the data provided by echocardiography and computerized tomography of the chest usually point to the relevant therapeutic measures without a need for invasive haemodynamic exploration. Idiopathic constrictive pericarditis now accounts for 50 percent of the cases; tuberculosis has become exceptional, but the other, previously exceptional causes (neoplasia, heart surgery, radiotherapy, connective tissue diseases) are more frequent. Corticosteroids should be used in chronic constrictive pericarditis occurring after cardiac surgery or in the course of a connective tissue disease, but they are effective only in highly inflammatory forms of the disease. Modern treatment relies on early surgery, since functional results and patient's survival are closely related to the date of pericardectomy which must be carried out before very important myocardial repercussions develop.
Constrictive pericarditis is a rare condition characterized by clinical signs of right heart failure subsequent to loss of pericardial compliance. The etiology of constrictive pericarditis has changed during the last decades in developed countries. While, in the past, tuberculosis and idiopathic pericardial constriction were the prevalent causes of the disease, cardiac surgery has become one of the main reasons for its development in recent years. However, cases defined as idiopathic constrictive pericarditis are still observed. In addition to the classical chronic and subacute forms, new presentations, such as effusive-constrictive, localized, transient, occult, and constrictive pericarditis with normal pericardial thickness, have been described. Although conservative treatment may alleviate the patient's symptoms, pericardiectomy remains the only definitive treatment for the disease. It is worth noting that the sooner the diagnosis of pericardial constriction is established, the better the outcome is. The pathophysiological features, clinical findings, diagnostic tools, and therapeutic approach to constrictive pericarditis are detailed in this review.
Twenty-nine patients who were referred with the possible diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis underwent electrocardiographically gated transverse spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to determine the accuracy of spin-echo MR imaging for the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis and to compare the morphologic features of constrictive pericarditis with those of restrictive cardiomyopathy as seen on spin-echo MR images. Constrictive pericarditis was verified by means of surgery and/or catheterization in 17 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR imaging in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis were 88%, 100%, and 93%, respectively. Thickened pericardium was observed in 88% of patients with proved constrictive pericarditis. Pericardial thickening was not identified in patients with restrictive myocarditis (n = 4). The most frequent site of pericardial thickening was over the right ventricle. In constrictive pericarditis, the signal intensity of the thickened pericardium was similar or decreased compared with that of the myocardium. Indirect findings of impaired right ventricular diastolic filling (eg, dilatation of the inferior vena cava and right atrium) were identified in constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy. MR imaging can serve as a noninvasive examination for the definitive diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis and can help distinguish between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy on the basis of pericardial thickness.
Constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy, two relatively uncommon clinical conditions, create a diagnostic dilemma primarily because of the many similarities in both their clinical and hemodynamic presentations. However, considerable differences exist in the pathophysiology, management, and prognosis between these two syndromes. Furthermore, the precise diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy is mandatory, as the former is often curable whereas only palliative treatments are available for the latter. In this brief review, similarities and differences in the various aspects of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy will be discussed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
INTRODUCTION: Constrictive pericarditis is a rare complication of asbestos exposure and few cases have been reported in the literature. CASE REPORT: We report two cases of constrictive pericarditis in subjects previously exposed to asbestos. The first case, a 62 years old man, had occupational asbestos exposure whilst working for seven years in an electric plant 23 years before the diagnosis. The second case, a 76 years old man, had worked 21 years as a lagger up until 20 years before. The initial presentation in both cases was of sub-acute right heart failure. Both underwent pericardectomy which revealed pericardial thickening due to collagen fibrosis. Both patients died, one and five years respectively after surgery. Eight other cases of pericardial effusion and/or thickening, some with calcification, have been reported in association with previous asbestos exposure. Most of these cases had coexisting pleural lesions. CONCLUSIONS: As the prognosis is guarded (three of the eight reported cases died), making an early diagnosis is desirable.
The hemodynamic changes consistent with constrictive pericarditis are often encountered in patients who have undergone cardiac transplantation. We describe here 4 patients who underwent pericardiectomy after cardiac transplantation. All were found to have evidence of a thickened and constricting peel of pericardium at surgical exploration. Their postoperative clinical courses were variable. One patient with primarily effusive constriction experienced marked improvement. Three patients failed to show clinical improvement and had persistently elevated atrial and ventricular end-diastolic pressures. A coexisting restrictive cardiomyopathy secondary to chronic rejection, coronary arteriopathy, or long-standing constriction may have been the cause of this poor outcome. Many patients with transplanted hearts exhibit evidence of poor diastolic ventricular compliance without evidence of classic constriction; some manifest both the restrictive and constrictive components. The careful selection of patients with constrictive pericarditis can optimize the outcome.
Epicardial constriction is a frequent accompaniment of constrictive pericarditis. The operative procedure presented here is an atraumatic, effective alternative to epicardial resection.
Constrictive pericarditis (CP) is an unusual sequela of cardiac surgery, so the present study evaluated the clinical characteristics of patients with CP after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Four hundred and sixty-three patients who underwent isolated CABG between January 1989 and March 1999 were examined retrospectively. The first choice of treatment for postoperative pericardial effusion was non-steroid anti-inflammatory agents, and an increased dose of diuretics. The second treatment choice was corticosteroids or pericardial drainage. When CP was suspected during the follow-up period (mean, 54+/-31 months), cardiac catheterization was carried out to establish the diagnosis. Of the 463 patients undergoing CABG, there were 11 (2.4%) who developed CP after surgery. The median time to the onset of symptoms after CABG was 4 weeks (range, 3-96 weeks). On univariate and multivariate analysis, normal left ventricular ejection fraction, warfarin administration, and early postoperative pericardial effusion were significantly associated with a greater potential of postoperative CP. The effusion was bloody in all cases of pericardial drainage despite warfarin therapy. Not draining the postoperative effusive pericardial effusion was a risk factor for the development of CP. Pericardial drainage for patients with significant effusion after CABG is important for the prevention of subsequent CP, especially in those patients being treated with warfarin or with normal left ventricular function.
Constrictive pericarditis was diagnosed in four patients who presented respiratory impairment and pleural effusion, associated with right ventricular failure in two. The cause was probable tuberculosis in two cases, post-irradiation lesions in one and unknown in one. The diagnosis was suspected due to the normal heart volume and pathological electrocardiogram as well as the computed tomographic findings demonstrating pericardial morphology. Right catheterism confirmed the diagnosis: increased right ventricular telediastolic pressure with a dip plateau and equivalent pressures in the right atrium and ventricle. Early diagnosis allowed pericardectomy in two cases. In one case, the subacute epicardopericarditis regressed with corticosteroids and antituberculosis therapy.