SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “RNA, Guide, Kinetoplastida”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Dyskinetoplastic Trypanosoma brucei contains functional editing complexes.

Mitochondrial pre-mRNAs undergo posttranscriptional RNA editing as directed by small guide RNAs (gRNAs) to produce functional mRNAs in kinetoplastid protozoa. The pre-mRNAs and gRNAs are encoded in the maxicircle and minicircle components, respectively, of the kinetoplastid mitochondrial DNA (kDNA), and editing is catalyzed by a multienzyme protein complex. Trypanosoma evansi AnTat3/3, which lacks maxicircles but retains a single class of minicircles, and a dyskinetoplastic mutant of Trypanosoma brucei EATRO164, which is devoid of kDNA, were both shown to retain genes and proteins for the editing complex. The proteins are present in complexes that immunoprecipitate and sediment indistinguishably from wild-type complexes. The complexes catalyze precleaved insertion and deletion editing as well as full-round deletion editing in vitro. Thus, mutants which lack the natural substrates for RNA editing and all or most gRNAs retain editing complexes that contain the four primary catalytic activities of editing and function in editing, at least in vitro. Therefore neither pre-mRNA nor gRNA is required to form functional RNA-editing complexes.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Trypanosoma equiperdum minicircles encode three distinct primary transcripts which exhibit guide RNA characteristics.

The mitochondrial DNA of trypanosomes is composed of maxicircle and minicircle DNAs catenated into a network, called the kinetoplast. Maxicircles encode proteins and RNAs necessary for mitochondrial assembly. Minicircles encode small transcripts which are believed to serve as guide RNAs in the process of RNA editing of maxicircle transcripts. Trypanosoma equiperdum minicircles contain three transcription units which produce three distinct transcripts. The genes for these transcripts are flanked by imperfect 18-bp repeats separated by approximately 110 bp. The transcripts have a 5' triphosphate, indicating that they are primary transcripts. Minicircle transcription initiates at a purine within a conserved sequence, 5'-AYAYA-3', where Y is a pyrimidine, 32 bp from the upstream inverted repeat, suggesting that the repeats may function in transcript initiation. Transcripts from a single minicircle transcription unit range in size from 55 to 70 nucleotides. This size heterogeneity within a single sequence class is due to the variable length of nontemplated uridine residues composing a 3' tail. The size range and heterogeneous polyuridylate 3' end of the minicircle transcripts appear to be conserved features and may be related to transcript function.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

An intergenic G-rich region in Leishmania tarentolae kinetoplast maxicircle DNA is a pan-edited cryptogene encoding ribosomal protein S12.

Six short G-rich intergenic regions in the maxicircle of Leishmania tarentolae are conserved in location and polarity in two other kinetoplastid species. We show here that G-rich region 6 (G6) represents a pan-edited cryptogene which contains at least two domains edited independently in a 3'-to-5' manner connected by short unedited regions. In the completely edited RNA, 117 uridines are added at 49 sites and 32 uridines are deleted at 13 sites, creating a translated 85-amino-acid polypeptide. Similar polypeptides are probably encoded by pan-edited G6 transcripts in two other species. The G6 polypeptide has significant sequence similarity to the family of S12 ribosomal proteins. A minicircle-encoded gRNA overlaps 12 editing sites in G6 mRNA, and chimeric gRNA/mRNA molecules were shown to exist, in agreement with the transesterification model for editing.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1992

Guide RNAs for transcripts with developmentally regulated RNA editing are present in both life cycle stages of Trypanosoma brucei.

RNA editing of several mitochondrial transcripts in Trypanosoma brucei is developmentally regulated. The cytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase II mRNAs are edited in procyclic-form parasites but are primarily unedited in bloodstream forms. The latter forms lack the mitochondrial respiratory system present in procyclic forms. Editing of the NADH dehydrogenase 7 (ND7) and ND8 transcripts is also developmentally regulated but occurs preferentially in bloodstream forms. Other transcripts, cytochrome oxidase III and ATPase 6, are edited in both life forms. We have identified many minicircle-encoded guide RNAs (gRNAs) for ATPase 6, ND7, and ND8. The characteristics of these gRNAs reveal how extensively edited RNA can be edited in the 3'-to-5' direction. Northern (RNA) blot and primer extension analyses indicate that gRNAs for transcripts whose editing is developmentally regulated are present in both procyclic and bloodstream form parasites. These results suggest that the developmental regulation of editing in these transcripts is not controlled by the presence or absence of gRNAs.

Aging↗

PubMed1992

Maxicircle CR1 transcripts of Trypanosoma brucei are edited and developmentally regulated and encode a putative iron-sulfur protein homologous to an NADH dehydrogenase subunit.

The maxicircle of Trypanosoma brucei encodes components of the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation system, as do other mitochondrial DNAs, but maxicircle gene identification is complicated by extensive editing of some transcripts. We found that transcripts from the CR1 region were extensively edited, as are other transcripts from maxicircle regions which exhibit strong G versus C strand bias. Editing added 259 uridines and removed 46 uridines to produce an approximately 574-nucleotide mature mRNA. Partially edited cDNAs and potential guide RNAs were also characterized. Initiation and termination codons were created, and they defined an open reading frame encoding a predicted protein of 145 amino acids. This protein contains two iron-sulfur cysteine motifs and is homologous to a subunit of NADH dehydrogenase and to other electron-carrier proteins. Higher levels of both edited and unedited CR1 transcripts accumulated in bloodstream forms of the parasite than in procyclic forms, suggesting developmental regulation of CR1 gene expression.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1994

RNA editing and mitochondrial genomic organization in the cryptobiid kinetoplastid protozoan Trypanoplasma borreli.

The bodonids and cryptobiids represent an early diverged sister group to the trypanosomatids among the kinetoplastid protozoa. The trypanosome type of uridine insertion-deletion RNA editing was found to occur in the cryptobiid fish parasite Trypanoplasma borreli. A pan-edited ribosomal protein, S12, and a novel 3'- and 5'-edited cytochrome b, in addition to an unedited cytochrome oxidase III gene and an apparently unedited 12S rRNA gene, were found in a 6-kb fragment of the 80- to 90-kb mitochondrial genome. The gene order differs from that in trypanosomatids, as does the organization of putative guide RNA genes; guide RNA-like molecules are transcribed from tandemly repeated 1-kb sequences organized in 200- and 170-kb molecules instead of minicircles. The presence of pan-editing in this lineage is consistent with an ancient evolutionary origin of this process.

Animals↗

PubMed1994

Assembly of mitochondrial ribonucleoprotein complexes involves specific guide RNA (gRNA)-binding proteins and gRNA domains but does not require preedited mRNA.

RNA editing in kinetoplastids probably employs a macromolecular complex, the editosome, that is likely to include the guide RNAs (gRNAs) which specify the edited sequence. Specific ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes which form in vitro with gRNAs (H. U. Göringer, D. J. Koslowsky, T. H. Morales, and K. D. Stuart, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, in press) are potential editosomes or their precursors. We find that several factors are important for in vitro formation of these RNP complexes and identify specific gRNA-binding proteins present in the complexes. Preedited mRNA promotes the in vitro formation of the four major gRNA-containing RNP complexes under some conditions but is required for the formation of only a subcomponent of one complex. The 5' gRNA sequence encompassing the RYAYA and anchor regions and the 3' gRNA oligo(U) tail are both important in complex formation, since their deletion results in a dramatic decrease of some complexes and the absence of others. UV cross-linking experiments identify several proteins which are in contact with gRNA and preedited mRNA in mitochondrial extracts. Proteins of 25 and 90 kDa are highly specific for gRNAs, and the 90-kDa protein binds specifically to gRNA oligo(U) tails. The gRNA-binding proteins exhibit a differential distribution between the four in vitro-formed complexes. These experiments reveal several proteins potentially involved in RNA editing and indicate that multiple recognition elements in gRNAs are used for complex formation.

Animals↗

PubMed1995

Guide RNA-mRNA chimeras, which are potential RNA editing intermediates, are formed by endonuclease and RNA ligase in a trypanosome mitochondrial extract.

RNA editing in kinetoplast mitochondrial transcripts involves the insertion and/or deletion of uridine residues and is directed by guide RNAs (gRNAs). It is thought to occur through a chimeric intermediate in which the 3' oligo(U) tail of the gRNA is covalently joined to the 3' portion of the mRNA at the site being edited. Chimeras have been proposed to be formed by a transesterification reaction but could also be formed by the known mitochondrial site-specific nuclease and RNA ligase. To distinguish between these models, we studied chimera formation in vitro directed by a trypanosome mitochondrial extract. This reaction was found to occur in two steps. First, the mRNA is cleaved in the 3' portion of the editing domain, and then the 3' fragment derived from this cleavage is ligated to the gRNA. The isolated mRNA 3' cleavage product is a more efficient substrate for chimera formation than is the intact mRNA, inconsistent with a transesterification mechanism but supporting a nuclease-ligase mechanism. Also, when normal mRNA cleavage is inhibited by the presence of a phosphorothioate, normal chimera formation no longer occurs. Rather, this phosphorothioate induces both cleavage and chimera formation at a novel site within the editing domain. Finally, levels of chimera-forming activity correlate with levels of mitochondrial RNA ligase activity when reactions are conducted under conditions which inhibit the ligase, including the lack of ATP containing a cleavable alpha-beta bond. These data show that chimera formation in the mitochondrial extract occurs by a nuclease-ligase mechanism rather than by transesterification.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Guide RNA requirement for editing-site-specific endonucleolytic cleavage of preedited mRNA by mitochondrial ribonucleoprotein particles in Trypanosoma brucei.

RNA editing in trypanosome mitochondria entails the posttranscriptional internal addition and occasional deletion of uridines from precursor mRNAs. Ample evidence exists to show that the information specifying the site and number of uridines added or deleted comes from small, mitochondrially encoded guide RNAs (gRNAs). More recent work indicates that the process involves an enzymatic cascade, initiating with an endonucleolytic cleavage of the pre-mRNA at an editing site. The cleaved editing site can undergo uridine (U) addition to or deletion from the 3' end of the 5' fragment via a mitochondrial terminal uridylyl transferase (TUTase) or terminal uridylyl exonuclease, respectively. Mitochondrial RNA ligase subsequently rejoins the mRNA. Activities to carry out these processes have been found in trypanosome mitochondria, including an editing-site-specific endonuclease activity which cleaves preedited but not edited mRNAs. We have found that this enzymatic activity cosediments with the same 19S ribonucleoprotein particle previously shown to contain TUTase, RNA ligase, and gRNAs and remains stable after salt treatment. Depletion of endogenous cytochrome b gRNAs by the addition of complementary oligonucleotides in vitro completely inhibits editing-site cleavage of synthetic preedited cytochrome b mRNA. The addition of synthetic cognate gRNA for cytochrome b but not unrelated small RNA restores editing-site cleavage. These studies show that in addition to specifying the site and number of uridines added or deleted, gRNAs provide the necessary information for cleavage by the editing-site-specific endonuclease.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

PubMed1998

Association of guide RNA binding protein gBP21 with active RNA editing complexes in Trypanosoma brucei.

RNA editing in Trypanosoma brucei mitochondria produces mature mRNAs by a series of enzyme-catalyzed reactions that specifically insert or delete uridylates in association with a macromolecular complex. Using a mitochondrial fraction enriched for in vitro RNA editing activity, we produced several monoclonal antibodies that are specific for a 21-kDa guide RNA (gRNA) binding protein initially identified by UV cross-linking. Immunofluorescence studies localize the protein to the mitochondrion, with a preference for the kinetoplast. The antibodies cause a supershift of previously identified gRNA-specific ribonucleoprotein complexes and immunoprecipitate in vitro RNA editing activities that insert and delete uridylates. The immunoprecipitated material also contains gRNA-specific endoribonuclease, terminal uridylyltransferase, and RNA ligase activities as well as gRNA and both edited and unedited mRNA. The immunoprecipitate contains numerous proteins, of which the 21-kDa protein, a 90-kDa protein, and novel 55- and 16-kDa proteins can be UV cross-linked to gRNA. These studies indicate that the 21-kDa protein associates with the ribonucleoprotein complex (or complexes) that catalyze RNA editing.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Trypanosoma brucei guide RNA poly(U) tail formation is stabilized by cognate mRNA.

Guide RNAs (gRNAs) are small RNAs that provide specificity for uridine addition and deletion during mRNA editing in trypanosomes. Terminal uridylyl transferase (TUTase) adds uridines to pre-mRNAs during RNA editing and adds a poly(U) tail to the 3' end of gRNAs. The poly(U) tail may stabilize the association of gRNAs with cognate mRNA during editing. Both TUTase and gRNAs associate with two ribonucleoprotein complexes, I (19S) and II (35S to 40S). Complex II is believed to be the fully assembled active editing complex, since it contains pre-edited mRNA and enzymes thought necessary for editing. Purification of TUTase from mitochondrial extracts resulted in the identification of two chromatographically distinct TUTase activities. Stable single-uridine addition to different substrate RNAs is performed by the 19S complex, despite the presence of a uridine-specific 3' exonuclease within this complex. Multiple uridines are added to substrate RNAs by a 10S particle that may be an unstable subunit of complex I lacking the uridine-specific 3' exonuclease. Multiple uridines could be stably added onto gRNAs by complex I when the cognate mRNA is present. We propose a model in which the purine-rich region of the cognate mRNA protects the uridine tail from a uridine exonuclease activity that is present within the complex. To test this model, we have mutated the purine-rich region of the pre-mRNA to abolish base-pairing interaction with the poly(U) tail of the gRNA. This RNA fails to protect the uridine tail of the gRNA from exoribonucleolytic trimming and is consistent with a role for the purine-rich region of the mRNA in gRNA maturation.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Trypanosome RNA editing: simple guide RNA features enhance U deletion 100-fold.

Trypanosome RNA editing is a massive processing of mRNA by U deletion and U insertion, directed by trans-acting guide RNAs (gRNAs). A U deletion cycle and a U insertion cycle have been reproduced in vitro using synthetic ATPase (A6) pre-mRNA and gRNA. Here we examine which gRNA features are important for this U deletion. We find that, foremost, this editing depends critically on the single-stranded character of a few gRNA and a few mRNA residues abutting the anchor duplex, a feature not previously appreciated. That plus any base-pairing sequence to tether the upstream mRNA are all the gRNA needs to direct unexpectedly efficient in vitro U deletion, using either the purified editing complex or whole extract. In fact, our optimized gRNA constructs support faithful U deletion up to 100 times more efficiently than the natural gRNA, and they can edit the majority of mRNA molecules. This is a marked improvement of in vitro U deletion, in which previous artificial gRNAs were no more active than natural gRNA and the editing efficiencies were at most a few percent. Furthermore, this editing is not stimulated by most other previously noted gRNA features, including its potential ligation bridge, 3' OH moiety, any U residues in the tether, the conserved structure of the central region, or proteins that normally bind these regions. Our data also have implications about evolutionary forces active in RNA editing.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

RNA sequence and base pairing effects on insertion editing in Trypanosoma brucei.

RNA editing inserts and deletes uridylates (U's) in kinetoplastid mitochondrial pre-mRNAs by a series of enzymatic steps. Small guide RNAs (gRNAs) specify the edited sequence. Editing, though sometimes extensive, is precise. The effects of mutating pre-mRNA and gRNA sequences in, around, and upstream of the editing site on the specificity and efficiency of in vitro insertion editing were examined. U's could be added opposite guiding pyrimidines, but guiding purines, particularly A's, were required for efficient ligation. A base pair between mRNA and gRNA immediately upstream of the editing site was not required for insertion editing, although it greatly enhanced its efficiency and accuracy. In addition, a gRNA/mRNA duplex upstream of the editing site enhanced insertion editing when it was close to the editing site, but prevented cleavage, and hence editing, when immediately adjacent to the editing site. Thus, several aspects of mRNA-gRNA interaction, as well as gRNA base pairing with added U's, optimize editing efficiency, although they are not required for insertion editing.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

RNA editing in trypanosomatid mitochondria.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Sequence and structural requirements for optimal guide RNA-directed insertional editing within Leishmania tarentolae.

The coding sequence of several mitochondrial mRNAs of the trypanosomatid family of protozoa is created by the guide RNA-directed insertion and deletion of uridylates (Us). Selection-amplification was used to explore the sequence and structure of the guide RNA and mRNA required for efficient insertional editing within a mitochondrial extract prepared from Leishmania tarentolae. This study identifies several novel features of the editing reaction in addition to several that are consistent with the previous mutagenesis and phylogenetic analysis of the reaction in Trypanosoma brucei, a distantly related trypanosomatid. Specifically, there is a strong bias against cytidines 5' of the editing sites and guanosines immediately 3' of guiding nucleotides. U insertions are directed both 5' and 3' of a genomically encoded U, which was previously assumed not to occur. Base pairing immediately flanking an editing site can significantly stimulate the editing reaction and affect the reaction fidelity but is not essential. Likewise, single-stranded RNA in the region upstream of the editing site, not necessarily immediately adjacent, can facilitate editing but is also not essential. The editing of an RNA containing many of the optimal features is linear with increasing quantities of extract permitting specific activity measurements to be made that are not possible with previously described T. brucei and L. tarentolae assays. The reaction catalyzed by the L. tarentolae extract can be highly accurate, which does not support a proposed model for editing that was based largely on the inaccuracy of an earlier in vitro reaction.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

KREPA4, an RNA binding protein essential for editosome integrity and survival of Trypanosoma brucei.

The 20S editosome, a multiprotein complex, catalyzes the editing of most mitochondrial mRNAs in trypanosomatids by uridylate insertion and deletion. RNAi mediated inactivation of expression of KREPA4 (previously TbMP24), a component of the 20S editosome, in procyclic form Trypanosoma brucei resulted in inhibition of cell growth, loss of RNA editing, and disappearance of 20S editosomes. Levels of MRP1 and REAP-1 proteins, which may have roles in editing but are not editosome components, were unaffected. Tagged KREPA4 protein is incorporated into 20S editosomes in vivo with no preference for either insertion or deletion subcomplexes. Consistent with its S1-like motif, recombinant KREPA4 protein binds synthetic gRNA with a preference for the 3' oligo (U) tail. These data suggest that KREPA4 is an RNA binding protein that may be specific for the gRNA Utail and also is important for 20S editosome stability.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

PubMed2006

Interactions of mRNAs and gRNAs involved in trypanosome mitochondrial RNA editing: structure probing of a gRNA bound to its cognate mRNA.

Expression of mitochondrial genes in Trypanosoma brucei requires RNA editing of its mRNA transcripts. During editing, uridylates are precisely inserted and deleted as directed by the gRNA template to create the protein open reading frame. This process involves the bimolecular interaction of the gRNA with its cognate pre-edited mRNA and the assembly of a protein complex with the enzymatic machinery required. While a considerable amount of work has been done identifying the protein components of the editing complex, very little is known about how a functional editosome is assembled. In addition, the importance of RNA structure in establishing a functional editing complex is poorly understood. Work in our lab suggests that different mRNA/gRNA pairs can form similar secondary structures suggesting that a common core architecture may be important for editosome recognition and function. Using solution structure probing, we have investigated the structure of the initiating gRNA, gCYb-558, in the mRNA/gRNA complex with pre-edited apocytochrome b mRNA. Our data indicate that the stem-loop formed by the guiding region of the gRNA alone is maintained in its interaction with the pre-edited message. In addition, our data suggest that a gRNA stem-loop structure is maintained through the first few editing events by the use of alternative base-pairing with the U-tail.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

The 3'-untranslated region of cytochrome oxidase II mRNA functions in RNA editing of African trypanosomes exclusively as a cis guide RNA.

RNA editing in trypanosomes is a post-transcriptional process responsible for correcting the coding sequences of many mitochondrial mRNAs. Uridines are specifically added or deleted from mRNA by an enzymatic cascade in which a pre-edited mRNA is specifically cleaved, uridines are added or removed, and the corrected mRNA is ligated. The process is directed by RNA molecules, termed guide RNAs (gRNA). The ability of this class of small, noncoding RNA to function in RNA editing is essential for these organisms. Typically, gRNAs are transcribed independent of the their cognate mRNA and anneal to form a binary RNA complex . An exception for this process may be cytochrome oxidase subunit II (COII) mRNA since a gene encoding a trans acting gRNA has not been identified. Using an in vitro editing assay we find that the 3' UTR of COII, indeed, functions as a guide for both the site and number of uridines added to the coding region of the COII mRNA. We further show that the guiding sequence within the COII 3' UTR can only function in COII editing when contiguous with the editing substrate, indicating that the 3' UTR of COII lacks sequence or structure information necessary to function as a trans-acting gRNA. While other RNAs have been shown to "guide" RNA processing reactions, our discovery that the COII 3' UTR directs editing of its cognate mRNA in cis, is a unique function for a 3' UTR. The findings described here have led us to propose a new model for the evolution of gRNAs in kinetoplastids.

3' Untranslated Regions↗