SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “RNA Editing”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

PubMed2006

A simple in vitro RNA editing assay for chloroplast transcripts using fluorescent dideoxynucleotides: distinct types of sequence elements required for editing of ndh transcripts.

RNA editing is found in various transcripts from land plant chloroplasts. In tobacco chloroplasts, C-to-U conversion occurs at 36 specific sites including two sites identified in this work. Our RNA editing assay system using chloroplast extracts facilitated biochemical analyses of editing reactions but required mRNAs labeled with (32)P at specific sites. Here, we have improved the in vitro system using fluorescence-labeled chain terminators, ddGTP and ddATP, and have measured the editing activity at 19 sites in ndh transcripts. Editing activities varied from site to site. It has been reported that one editing site in ndhA mRNAs is present in spinach but absent in tobacco, but a corresponding editing capacity had been found in vivo in tobacco using biolistic transformation. We confirmed biochemically the existence of this activity in tobacco extracts. Using the non-radioactive assay, we examined sequences essential for editing within a 50-nt mRNA region encompassing an editing site. Editing of the ndhB-2 site requires a short sequence in front of the editing site, while that of the ndhF mRNA requires two separate regions, a sequence surrounding the editing site and a 5' distal sequence. These results suggest that distinct editing mechanisms are present in chloroplasts.

Chloroplasts↗

PubMed1993

RNA editing in kinetoplastid mitochondria.

RNA editing in the mitochondrion of kinetoplastid protozoa results in the posttranscriptional addition and deletion of uridine residues in mRNAs. Editing of mRNAs can lead to the formation of initiation codons for mitochondrial translation, the correction of frame-shifted genes at the RNA level, and in extensively edited mRNAs, the formation of complete reading frames. Kinetoplastid RNA editing requires that genetic information from two or more separately transcribed genes be brought together to form the mature, edited mRNA. The information necessary for the proper insertion or deletion of uridines in the mRNA is present in small mitochondrial transcripts termed guide RNAs (gRNAs). Editing of mRNAs appears to be associated with a high molecular weight complex, called the editosome, containing specific gRNAs, unedited mRNAs, and proteins. Editing is likely a two-step process involving first the breakage of a phosphodiester bond at the editing site and formation of a chimeric molecule with a gRNA covalently joined to the 5' end of the 3' portion of an mRNA. The chimera is resolved by the rejoining of the 5' end of the mRNA to the 3' portion of the mRNA with the addition or deletion of a uridine at the junction point. Two models are proposed for the biochemical mechanism of RNA editing. The first is an enzymatic cascade of cleavage and ligation while the other supports successive rounds of transesterification. The obvious functional necessity for editing in kinetoplastid mitochondria is the formation of translatable mRNAs. Far less clear is the evolutionary origin of editing and the role editing plays in regulating mitochondrial gene expression.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Association of guide RNA binding protein gBP21 with active RNA editing complexes in Trypanosoma brucei.

RNA editing in Trypanosoma brucei mitochondria produces mature mRNAs by a series of enzyme-catalyzed reactions that specifically insert or delete uridylates in association with a macromolecular complex. Using a mitochondrial fraction enriched for in vitro RNA editing activity, we produced several monoclonal antibodies that are specific for a 21-kDa guide RNA (gRNA) binding protein initially identified by UV cross-linking. Immunofluorescence studies localize the protein to the mitochondrion, with a preference for the kinetoplast. The antibodies cause a supershift of previously identified gRNA-specific ribonucleoprotein complexes and immunoprecipitate in vitro RNA editing activities that insert and delete uridylates. The immunoprecipitated material also contains gRNA-specific endoribonuclease, terminal uridylyltransferase, and RNA ligase activities as well as gRNA and both edited and unedited mRNA. The immunoprecipitate contains numerous proteins, of which the 21-kDa protein, a 90-kDa protein, and novel 55- and 16-kDa proteins can be UV cross-linked to gRNA. These studies indicate that the 21-kDa protein associates with the ribonucleoprotein complex (or complexes) that catalyze RNA editing.

Animals↗

PubMed1993

Double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminase as a potential mammalian RNA editing factor.

Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) adenosine deaminase, or DRADA, is a cellular enzyme that modifies adenosine residues to inosines in dsRNA by hydrolytic deamination, replacing A-U with mismatched I-U base pairs. Since it alters the base composition in its substrate RNA, one possible role played by DRADA is to participate in RNA editing. In this article, a brief review is given of characteristics of DRADA. Its possible involvement in RNA editing is also discussed in detail, including specific cases in which DRADA has been implicated as an RNA editing factor.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

PubMed1996

Trypanosoma brucei RNA editing. A full round of uridylate insertional editing in vitro mediated by endonuclease and RNA ligase.

RNA editing in kinetoplastids is the post-transcriptional insertion and deletion of uridylate residues in mitochondrial transcripts, directed by base pairing with guide RNAs. Models for editing propose transesterification or endonuclease plus RNA ligase reactions and may involve a guide RNA-mRNA chimeric intermediate. We have assessed the feasibility of the enzymatic pathway involving chimeras in vitro. Cytochrome b chimeras generated with mitochondrial extract were first found to have junctions primarily at the major endonuclease cleavage sites, supporting the role of endonuclease in chimera formation. Such cytochrome b chimeras are then specifically cleaved by extract endonuclease within the oligo(U) tract at the editing site, and the mRNA cleavage products are then joined by RNA ligase to generate partially edited mRNAs with uridylate residues transferred to an editing site. These in vitro generated partially edited mRNAs mimic partially edited mRNAs generated in vivo. Specific endonuclease cleavage in the editing region of the partially edited RNA demonstrates the potential for further in vitro editing. Finally, sensitivity to various ATP analogs suggests that all editing-like activities reported thus far utilize a mechanism involving RNA ligase.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

Overexpression of APOBEC-1 results in mooring sequence-dependent promiscuous RNA editing.

Apolipoprotein B (apoB) RNA editing involves site-specific deamination of a cytidine to a uridine. A mooring sequence, a spacer region, and a regulator region are components of the apoB RNA editing motif of which only the mooring sequence is both necessary and sufficient for editosome assembly and editing. The catalytic component of the editosome is APOBEC-1. In rat hepatoma, stable cell lines, overexpression of APOBEC-1 resulted in 3 6-fold stimulation of the editing efficiency on either rat endogenous apoB RNA or transiently expressed human apoB RNA. In these cell lines, cytidines in addition to the one at the wild type site were edited. The occurrence and efficiency of this "promiscuous" editing increased with increasing expression of APOBEC-1. Promiscuous editing was restricted to cytidines 5' of the mooring sequence and only occurred on RNAs that had been edited at the wild type site. Moreover, RNAs with mutant editing motifs supported high efficiency but low fidelity editing in the presence of high levels of APOBEC-1. This study demonstrates that overexpression of APOBEC-1 can increase the efficiency of site-specific editing but can also result in promiscuous editing.

APOBEC-1 Deaminase↗

PubMed1995

Isolation and characterization of intranuclear ribonucleoprotein complexes associated with double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminase from brain cells: implications for RNA-editing and hypermutation of viral RNA in the CNS.

Double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminase (DsRAD), which converts adenosine in duplex RNA to inosine, has been implicated in editing of cellular mRNA and hypermutation of viral RNA in the central nervous system (CNS). We used subcellular fractionation to show that DsRAD in bovine brain tissues is associated with high-molecular-weight ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes in the nuclei. DsRAD-associated RNP complexes have apparent molecular mass of up to 500 kDa and buoyant density of 1.35 to 1.42 g cc-1 in CsCl solution. In human glioma cells, DsRAD is also found exclusively in intranuclear RNP complexes that co-sediment with the largest RNA species. These DsRAD-associated RNP complexes are dissociated by RNase A or high salt. The RNA component is not essential for DsRAD activity, and the protein component can be separated by dsRNA-affinity column, gel filtration column, and glycerol gradient into enzymatically active protein species with apparent molecular mass ranging from 120 kDa to 70 kDa in polyacrylamide gel. The bovine brain DsRAD has no apparent requirement for low-molecular-weight cofactors or metal ions. These results provide insight into the native state of DsRAD in brain cells and have interesting implications for its putative roles in RNA-editing and hypermutation of viral RNA in the CNS.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

PubMed1990

A model for RNA editing in kinetoplastid mitochondria: "guide" RNA molecules transcribed from maxicircle DNA provide the edited information.

A class of small RNA molecules possibly involved in RNA editing is present in the mitochondrion of Leishmania tarentolae. These "guide" RNA (gRNA) molecules are encoded in intergenic regions of the mitochondrial maxicircle DNA and contain sequences that represent precise complementary versions of the mature mRNAs within the edited regions. In addition, the 5' portions of several gRNAs can form hybrids with mRNAs just 3' of the preedited region. A model is presented in which a partial hybrid formed between the gRNA and preedited mRNA is substrate for multiple cycles of cleavage, addition or deletion of uridylates, and religation, eventually resulting in a complete hybrid between the gRNA and the mature edited mRNA.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

RBP16 stimulates trypanosome RNA editing in vitro at an early step in the editing reaction.

RBP16 is an abundant RNA binding protein from Trypanosoma brucei mitochondria that affects both RNA editing and stability. We report here experiments aimed at elucidating the mechanism of RBP16 function in RNA editing. In in vitro RNA editing assays, recombinant RBP16 is able to significantly stimulate insertion editing of both CYb and A6 pre-mRNAs. Enhancement of in vitro editing activity occurs at, or prior to, the step of pre-mRNA cleavage, as evidenced by increased accumulation of pre-mRNA 3' cleavage products in the presence of RBP16. Mutated RBP16 that is severely compromised in cold shock domain (CSD)-mediated RNA binding was able to enhance editing to levels comparable to the wild-type protein in some assays at the highest RBP16 levels tested. However, at low RBP16 concentrations or in assays with native, oligo(U)-tail-bearing gRNAs, editing stimulation by mutant RBP16 was somewhat compromised. Together, these results indicate that both the N-terminal CSD and C-terminal RGG RNA binding domains of RBP16 are required for maximal editing stimulation. Finally, the relaxed specificity of RBP16 for stimulation of both CYb and A6 editing in vitro implicates additional specificity factors that account for the strict CYb specificity of RBP16 action in editing in vivo. Our results constitute the first report of any putative RNA editing accessory factor eliciting an effect on editing in vitro. Overall, these results support a novel accessory role for RBP16 in U insertion editing.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1996

Control of gene expression by base deamination: the case of RNA editing in wheat mitochondria.

The term 'RNA editing' was used for the first time in 1986 to describe the process of uridylate insertion into trypanosomal mitochondrial transcripts. Since then, the term has been used more generally to describe a large variety of processes involving base insertions, deletions and conversions that generate RNAs with a primary sequence different to those encoded by the gene. RNA editing has been observed in the mitochondrial fraction of trypanosomes, plants and other organisms, in the animal nuclear fraction in the case of the apolipoprotein B and glutamate brain receptors mRNAs as well as in viruses like paramyxovirus, hepatitis delta and probably HIV. The role of cytidine and adenine deamination leading to C to U and A to I transitions has became pivotal to explain this process by base conversion. In this review we will focus mainly on the work performed in our group on plant mitochondria and more specifically on the mechanism and the functional significance of RNA editing in wheat organelles. The original contributions of our laboratory in this field are: i) showing that RNA editing is reflected at the protein level; ii) settling three in vitro systems to assay C to U conversion using a wheat mitochondrial lysate as source of enzymes and factors, and unedited mRNA from the same source, as substrate; iii) determination by double labelling of the unedited substrate that RNA editing in wheat mitochondria occurs via a deamination step; and iv) that introducing unedited proteins in the mitochondria of transgenic plants leads to the emergence of cytoplasmic male sterility supporting the idea that the role of this process is to produce functional proteins. Using the antisense approach in transgenic plants we were able to obtain a significant male fertility restoration.

Cytosine Deaminase↗

PubMed1999

RNA editing sites in tobacco chloroplast transcripts: editing as a possible regulator of chloroplast RNA polymerase activity.

Genetic information in chloroplast DNA is sometimes altered at the transcript level by a process known as RNA editing. Sequence analysis of amplified cDNAs for 69 potential editing sites revealed 13 real editing sites in transcripts of 11 tobacco chloroplast genes. Together with those reported previously, these bring the total of edited sites observed in tobacco chloroplast transcripts to 31 (all involve C to U conversion). Alignment of sequences around the 31 editing sites revealed no obvious consensus, apart from an apparent bias for U or C at position -1 and A at position +2. Editing in tobacco rpoA mRNA restores the conserved leucine residue which is known to be important for transcriptional activation of the alpha subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase. Editing of this site is partial and the extent of editing depends on developmental conditions, suggesting that editing is, at least in part, involved in the regulation of chloroplast-encoded RNA polymerase activity.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2001

RNA editing by adenosine deaminases that act on RNA.

ADARs are RNA editing enzymes that target double-stranded regions of nuclear-encoded RNA and viral RNA. These enzymes are particularly abundant in the nervous system, where they diversify the information encoded in the genome, for example, by altering codons in mRNAs. The functions of ADARs in known substrates suggest that the enzymes serve to fine-tune and optimize many biological pathways, in ways that we are only starting to imagine. ADARs are also interesting in regard to the remarkable double-stranded structures of their substrates and how enzyme specificity is achieved with little regard to sequence. This review summarizes ongoing investigations of the enzyme family and their substrates, focusing on biological function as well as biochemical mechanism.

3' Untranslated Regions↗

PubMed1991

RNA editing.

Since its discovery, RNA editing in kinetoplastid mitochondria has proven a fascinating topic of study, and the last one and a half years have witnessed enormous advances in our understanding of this unprecedented form of RNA processing. The information flow in this RNA editing, once considered a candidate for defying the central dogma, is now known to conform to the DNA-to-RNA-to-protein paradigm, with the novel feature that the sequence of an edited region is not actually present in any DNA segment, but instead derives by a novel micro-interdigitating of information encoded in multiple DNA regions.

Mitochondria↗

PubMed2003

In vitro RNA editing in pea mitochondria requires NTP or dNTP, suggesting involvement of an RNA helicase.

To analyze the biochemical parameters of RNA editing in plant mitochondria and to eventually characterize the enzymes involved we developed a novel in vitro system. The high sensitivity of the mismatch-specific thymine glycosylase is exploited to facilitate reliable quantitative evaluation of the in vitro RNA editing products. A pea mitochondrial lysate correctly processes a C to U editing site in the cognate atp9 template. Reaction conditions were determined for a number of parameters, which allow first conclusions on the proteins involved. The apparent tolerance against specific Zn2+ chelators argues against the involvement of a cytidine deaminase enzyme, the theoretically most straightforward catalysator of the deamination reaction. Participation of a transaminase was investigated by testing potential amino group receptors, but none of these increased the RNA editing reaction. Most notable is the requirement of the RNA editing activity for NTPs. Any NTP or dNTP can substitute for ATP to the optimal concentration of 15 mm. This observation suggests the participation of an RNA helicase in the predicted RNA editing protein complex of plant mitochondria.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

PubMed1997

Occurrence of plastid RNA editing in all major lineages of land plants.

RNA editing changes posttranscriptionally single nucleotides in chloroplast-encoded transcripts. Although much work has been done on mechanistic and functional aspects of plastid editing, little is known about evolutionary aspects of this RNA processing step. To gain a better understanding of the evolution of RNA editing in plastids, we have investigated the editing patterns in ndhB and rbcL transcripts from various species comprising all major groups of land plants. Our results indicate that RNA editing occurs in plastids of bryophytes, fern allies, true ferns, gymnosperms, and angiosperms. Both editing frequencies and editing patterns show a remarkable degree of interspecies variation. Furthermore, we have found that neither plastid editing frequencies nor the editing pattern of a specific transcript correlate with the phylogenetic tree of the plant kingdom. The poor evolutionary conservation of editing sites among closely related species as well as the occurrence of single species-specific editing sites suggest that the differences in the editing patterns and editing frequencies are probably due both to independent loss and to gain of editing sites. In addition, our results indicate that RNA editing is a relatively ancient process that probably predates the evolution of land plants. This supposition is in good agreement with the phylogenetic data obtained for plant mitochondrial RNA editing, thus providing additional evidence for common evolutionary roots of the two plant organellar editing systems.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2006

The importance of RNA structure in RNA editing and a potential proofreading mechanism for correct guide RNA:pre-mRNA binary complex formation.

RNA editing in trypanosomes is a post-transcriptional process responsible for correcting the coding sequences of many mitochondrial mRNAs. Uridine bases are specifically added or deleted from mRNA by an enzymatic cascade in which a pre-edited mRNA is cleaved specifically, uridine bases are added or removed, and the corrected mRNA is ligated. The process is directed by RNA molecules, termed guide RNAs (gRNA). The ability of this class of small, non-coding RNA to function in RNA editing is essential for these organisms. Typically, gRNAs are transcribed independent of their cognate mRNA and anneal to form a binary RNA complex. An exception from this process is the cytochrome oxidase subunit II (COII) mRNA, which encodes its gRNA within its 3' untranslated region. This gRNA lacks the ability to function in trans. Using an in vitro editing assay, we find that improving thermodynamic stability to the anchor region through increased Watson-Crick base-pairing is sufficient to impart trans editing activity. We further show that a point mutation outside the known functional regions of a gRNA induces both a conformational rearrangement of the gRNA and causes a decrease in the rate of editing. Taken together, these results lead us to propose a model for a potential proofreading step in the formation of a gRNA:pre-edited mRNA binary complex. The mechanism relies on the thermodynamic stability supplied to the RNA complex through Watson-Crick base-pairing. Through mutations in the gRNA, we demonstrate the importance of gRNA structure to the RNA editing reaction.

3' Untranslated Regions↗

PubMed1994

RNA editing of human kainate receptor subunits.

RNA editing has been shown to be critical in generating the molecular diversity of rodent kainate receptors. We have examined cDNAs derived from various human brain sources to assess the occurrence and extent of RNA editing in human brain. Comparison of genomic and cDNA sequences revealed extensive editing of the human EAA4 (GluR6) mRNA at the isoleucine/valine, tyrosine/cysteine sites of the transmembrane I region, and the glutamine/arginine site of the transmembrane II region. Of the eight potential molecular variants generated by the nucleotide exchange, five were observed in the tissues examined. The distribution of the various RNA editing combinations were not uniform, and displayed tissue and/or age dependent distribution. Editing of the glutamine/arginine site was also confirmed for EAA3 (GluR5), which displays a significantly higher extent of editing in specific human brain regions compared with rodent whole brain. Hence, it can be concluded that RNA editing is a determinant of the phenotype of human kainate receptor complexes.

Aged↗

PubMed1993

Implications of novel guide RNA features for the mechanism of RNA editing in Crithidia fasciculata.

We have determined the relative steady state concentration of the two Crithidia fasciculata guide (g)RNAs involved in editing the two domains of mRNAs for NADH dehydrogenase (ND) subunit 7. We found that, although there was an 8-fold difference between the molar ratio of these two gRNAs relative to the (pre)-mRNA, the two domains are edited with a very similar frequency (around 50%). Also, for the editing of a given domain, many gRNA species exist with the same 5' end but with a different 3' uridylation site. Approximately 20% of these short gRNAs do not contain the information required for editing a complete domain, which may explain the high incidence of partially edited RNAs. Remarkably, genomically encoded Us are missing from two sites of a few of the gRNAs involved in editing apocytochrome b RNA. We speculate that these species are created by editing-like events. Both the short and complete forms of the ND7 gRNAs are found in chimeric molecules, in which the gRNA is covalently linked via its 3'-terminus to an editing site of pre-edited ND7 RNA. Some features of the chimeric molecules are at odds with current models of RNA editing: (i) U residues are completely absent from the connecting sequence of a number of these molecules, (ii) the ND7 gRNAs are frequently hooked up to the wrong editing domain of ND7 RNA, although other gRNAs are not found at these positions and (iii) in some chimeric molecules the gRNA appears to be linked to the 5' end of pre-edited RNA.

Animals↗