SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Reminder Systems”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve quality of care for diabetes and coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of an integrated patient-specific electronic clinical reminder system on diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD) care and to assess physician attitudes toward this reminder system. DESIGN: We enrolled 194 primary care physicians caring for 4549 patients with diabetes and 2199 patients with CAD at 20 ambulatory clinics. Clinics were randomized so that physicians received either evidence-based electronic reminders within their patients' electronic medical record or usual care. There were five reminders for diabetes care and four reminders for CAD care. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was receipt of recommended care for diabetes and CAD. We created a summary outcome to assess the odds of increased compliance with overall diabetes care (based on five measures) and overall CAD care (based on four measures). We surveyed physicians to assess attitudes toward the reminder system. RESULTS: Baseline adherence rates to all quality measures were low. While electronic reminders increased the odds of recommended diabetes care (odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.67) and CAD (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.55), the impact of individual reminders was variable. A total of three of nine reminders effectively increased rates of recommended care for diabetes or CAD. The majority of physicians (76%) thought that reminders improved quality of care. CONCLUSION: An integrated electronic reminder system resulted in variable improvement in care for diabetes and CAD. These improvements were often limited and quality gaps persist.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1999

Translating national childhood immunization guidelines to a computer-based reminder recall system within an immunization registry.

To translate national childhood immunization guidelines to a computer-based reminder recall system, hierarchical system architecture design and combined approach of tabular and procedural knowledge representation are taken. Nested branches with hierarchical combinations of single antecedent variables are used to avoid logical incompleteness, redundancy and inconsistency. Mapping to the local electronic medical vocabulary is implemented to facilitate the integration with the local information system architecture. 26 second-level modules with 195 original branches and 121 final branches after pruning are encoded. 99.67% of the reminders are confirmed to be correct by SQL query.

Child↗

PubMed1999

Failure to keep clinic appointments: implications for residency education and productivity.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Missed clinic appointments significantly impact continuity of care, resident education, and clinical productivity. This national survey analyzed the awareness of family practice residency clinics regarding their missed appointment rate and the use of reminder systems. METHODS: We mailed a questionnaire to all 468 family practice residency programs in the United States and mailed two follow-up surveys to nonrespondents. RESULTS: The overall survey response rate was 60%. More than one third of the clinics reported a no-show rate of > 21%. When asked how the clinic arrived at their no-show rate, 64 (17.7%) respondents stated that the reported rate was an estimate. More than one third of all clinics did not use a patient reminder system for clinic appointments. When comparing clinics with high (> 20%) and low (< 20%) no-show rates, there was no statistically significant difference between the use or nonuse of mailed, telephone, or combined reminder systems. CONCLUSIONS: The clinic appointment no-show rate varies greatly among family practice residency programs. Even with the widely reported use of reminder systems, one third of programs continue to have no-show rates above 20%. This study is unusual in that there was no statistically significant difference in no-show rates between programs, based on the use of reminder systems. In an era of cost containment and increased accountability, appointment failures are a factor that will require additional study and intervention by family practice residency programs nationwide.

Appointments and Schedules↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Clinical reminders in ambulatory care.

Computerized reminders are a tool to improve patient care, increase compliance, and reduce medical liability in ambulatory health care. Continuity of care is often hard to achieve given large patient loads, cost containment pressures, and regulatory requirements. Recall reminders prompt patients to make or keep appointments for health maintenance or screening exams. Physician reminders are issued to clinicians at or between visits when their patients have specific screening or diagnostic needs. Reminder systems based on clinical protocols have the added advantage of providing explicit instructions for workup or treatment of abnormal conditions. These reminder systems are especially useful to standardize care in offices with many providers. Implementation of reminder systems is aided by careful staff preparation and resource allocation. Ultimately, reminder systems enhance quality of care, increase patient satisfaction, and reduce costs through improved continuity of care and early detection of serious illness.

Ambulatory Care Information Systems↗

PubMed2004

Office systems and their influence on mammography use in rural and urban primary care.

CONTEXT: Breast cancer screening rates are lower in rural communities. Although studies have addressed barriers to mammography for rural residents, physician practice barriers have received less attention. PURPOSE: Controlled clinical trials have shown that the use of office reminder systems in primary care practices is related to increased clinical care rates. Therefore, we compared office systems use in primary care practices located in rural and urban communities and assessed the impact of these systems on rural-urban differences in mammography utilization. METHODS: We identified female Kansas Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 to 79 from Medicare claims data (N = 24,030) and determined which beneficiaries received a mammogram between April 1, 1999, and March 31, 2001. We linked beneficiaries to their primary care providers and obtained surveys from 180 primary care practices on their use of office reminder systems. FINDINGS: Mammography rates ranged from 20% to 92% (mean = 65%) among the 180 practices. Flowsheets with a mammography prompt were used by 33% of the practices, 38% utilized nonphysician staff to identify women due for mammograms, and 15% used computerized reminder systems. Urban practices used flowsheets more often than rural practices (44% versus 16%, P < 0.001). A multivariable regression model demonstrated higher mammography rates in urban practices, group practices, and practices using mammography flowsheets. CONCLUSIONS: Despite success in randomized controlled trials, reminder systems are not used often by primary care providers and are used even less often in rural compared to urban practices. Consistent implementation may be a major barrier to the successful adaptation of flowsheets by primary care offices.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Computer-based ambulatory information systems: recent developments.

This article updates the author's earlier review of some of the major computer-based ambulatory information systems and the literature evaluating their costs, benefits, effect on quality of care, and physician acceptance. The evidence suggests that computer-based information systems can increase access to clinical information, improve physician performance, enhance quality of care, and facilitate outcomes research review. In addition to presenting health information networks and clinical decision support systems such as reminder systems, drug ordering systems, and medical care management systems, the article describes applications of telemedicine and Web-based systems. It also discusses barriers to the widespread use of computer-based ambulatory information systems.

Ambulatory Care Information Systems↗

PubMed2000

Effect of patient reminder/recall interventions on immunization rates: A review.

CONTEXT: Immunization rates for children and adults remain below national goals. While experts recommend that health care professionals remind patients of needed immunizations, few practitioners actually use reminders. Little is known about the effectiveness of reminders in different settings or patient populations. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of patient reminder systems in improving immunization rates, and to compare the effectiveness of different types of reminders for a variety of patient populations. DATA SOURCES: A search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Sociological Abstracts, and CAB Health Abstracts. Relevant articles, as well as published abstracts, conference proceedings, and files of study collaborators, were searched for relevant references. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: English-language studies involving patient reminder/recall interventions (using criteria established by the Cochrane Collaboration) were eligible for review if they involved randomized controlled trials, controlled before-after studies, or interrupted time series, and measured immunization rates. Of 109 studies identified, 41 met eligibility criteria. Studies were reviewed independently by 2 reviewers using a standardized checklist. Results of studies are expressed as absolute percentage-point changes in immunization rates and as odds ratios (ORs). Studies with similar characteristics of patients or interventions were pooled (random effects model). DATA SYNTHESIS: Patient reminder systems were effective in improving immunization rates in 33 (80%) of the 41 studies, irrespective of baseline immunization rates, patient age, setting, or vaccination type. Increases in immunization rates due to reminders ranged from 5 to 20 percentage points. Reminders were effective for childhood vaccinations (OR, 2.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49-2.72), childhood influenza vaccinations (OR, 4. 25; 95% CI, 2.10-8.60), adult pneumococcus or tetanus vaccinations (OR, 5.14; 95% CI, 1.21-21.78), and adult influenza vaccinations (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.69-3.10). While reminders were most effective in academic settings (OR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.98-5.58), they were also highly effective in private practice settings (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1. 45-2.22) and public health clinics (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.42-3.07). All types of reminders were effective (postcards, letters, and telephone or autodialer calls), with telephone reminders being most effective but costliest. CONCLUSIONS: Patient reminder systems in primary care settings are effective in improving immunization rates. Primary care physicians should use patient reminders to improve immunization delivery. JAMA. 2000;284:1820-1827.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Patient reminder letters to promote annual mammograms: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the effects of a reminder letter from a physician (relative to a mammography facility letter or no letter) on appointment compliance among women 50-74 years of age due for an annual screening mammogram. METHODS: A total of 1,562 women were randomly as signed to the groups. Each Group 1 subject received a reminder letter from her physician, each Group 2 subject received a reminder letter from her mammography facility, and Group 3 served as a control group. RESULTS: The return rates for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 47.7, 46.6, and 28.3%, respectively; the overall difference was significant using a chi(2) analysis (P < 0.001). Bonferroni pairwise comparisons indicated no difference between Groups 1 and 2 but significant differences (P < 0.001) between Group 3 and the other two groups. Logistic regression indicated that relative to Group 3, the adjusted odds of returning for Groups 1 and 2 were 2.37 and 2.24, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mammography providers and their patients likely will benefit from in-reach reminder systems. Physicians who do not use reminder systems should refer their patients to facilities that use these systems.

Aged↗

PubMed1993

Improving influenza vaccine coverage in at-risk groups. Good intentions are not enough.

OBJECTIVES: To raise awareness of the need for annual influenza vaccination in the elderly (those 65 years of age and older), and of the efficacy of organisational practice strategies (specifically at-risk registers and reminder systems) to improve influenza vaccine coverage. DATA SOURCES: Extensive search of the existing literature using MEDLINE and manual searching techniques. Recent key review articles on organisational strategies were also studied. STUDY SELECTION: Primary source articles were included if they evaluated the efficacy of vaccination and the various strategies used to improve coverage. More attention was paid to randomised controlled trials, although other study designs were considered. A formal algorithm for estimating the effect of organisational strategies was not used; rather, appropriate studies which highlighted advantages and disadvantages were selected. RESULTS: Current levels of vaccination for influenza are low. Negative patient attitudes and lack of an organised and systematic approach are the major barriers to improving vaccination rates. Vaccination coverage can be improved by 10%-30% by use of at-risk registers and reminder systems. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is required to determine the impact of both patient attitudes and reminder systems on influenza vaccination rates. A randomised controlled trial is currently underway to look at both these issues. Provider and patient reminder systems should be incorporated into general practice to improve the influenza vaccination rate.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

Relationship between primary payer and use of proactive immunization practices: a national survey.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the national use and determinants of proactive immunization practices by examining the relationship to the primary practice payer. STUDY DESIGN: A standardized survey was conducted in 1995 by trained personnel using computer-assisted telephone interviewing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A stratified random sample of family physicians, pediatricians, and general practitioners across the United States was selected from the American Medical Association master file of physicians list, which included nonmembers. The main outcome measures were use of reminder systems and assessment of immunization rates. RESULTS: Of the 1769 physicians who were contacted, 1236 participated. Use of reminder systems varied by the practice's primary payer: 31% of health maintenance organization (HMO), 41% of Medicaid, 27% of fee-for-service (FFS), and 28% of no predominant payment source physicians reported using a reminder system (P < 0.01). Use of computerized reminders also varied according to practice primary payer (HMO, 68%; Medicaid, 34%; FFS, 51%; and no predominant payment source, 42%; P < 0.01) as did assessment of immunization rates in the practice (HMO, 57%; Medicaid, 40%; FFS, 28%; and no predominant payment source, 30%; P < 0.01). A majority of Medicaid physicians (84%) required a physical examination before immunization, compared to 49% of HMO, 56% of FFS, and 63% of no predominant source physicians (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The primary payment source of a practice appears to influence use of proactive immunization practices.

Child↗

PubMed1991

Use of reminders for preventive procedures in family medicine.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of three computerized reminder systems in the delivery of five preventive procedures in family practice. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Ottawa Civic Hospital Family Medicine Centre. PARTICIPANTS: Of 8502 patients 15 years of age or more who were not in a hospital or institution 5883 were randomly assigned, by family, to a control group, a physician reminder group (passive) or a telephone or letter reminder group (active). The remaining 2619 patients were not included in the randomized portion of the study but were monitored. INTERVENTION: During 1 year the patients in the active reminder groups received a telephone call or letter reminding them of any overdue preventive procedures; for those in the passive reminder group the physician was reminded at an office visit to provide any overdue service. OUTCOME MEASURE: Rates of completion of the preventive procedures required. MAIN RESULTS: All three reminder systems significantly improved the delivery of preventive services (p less than 0.001). The procedure completion rates were 42.0% in the letter reminder group, 42.0% in the telephone reminder group, 33.7% in the physician reminder group and 14.1% in the randomized control group. The use of a letter was more cost-effective than the telephone system, but the physician reminder system was the most cost-effective. CONCLUSION: Computerized reminder systems do improve the delivery of preventive services in family practice.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

Recruitment of women by GPs for pap tests: a meta-analysis.

General practitioners (GPs) have a pivotal role to play in recruiting women for Pap tests. In recent times, considerable attention has been paid to the role of reminder systems in encouraging women to have regular Pap tests. Although a number of studies have investigated the effectiveness of reminder systems, there has been no comprehensive review. This paper aims to determine the effectiveness of patient and GP reminders in increasing the proportion of women screened for cervical cancer. Two electronic databases were searched for English-language randomized controlled trials conducted in a general practice or family medicine setting, and examining the effectiveness of GP and patient reminders in increasing the proportion of women screened for cervical cancer. Ten trials were identified, and meta-analytic techniques were employed to analyse the data from these trials. The women whose GPs had been prompted to remind them to have a Pap test were significantly more likely to do so than were control women (typical risk difference (TRD) = 6.6%, 95% CI = 5.2%-8.0%). The typical risk difference for the patient reminder studies was 4.9% (95% CI = 2.6%-7.2%). In both cases, sensitivity analysis revealed that one study stood out as an exceptional result. The omission of this study induced homogeneity among the remaining studies. Once this study was removed, the TRDs for the GP reminder and patient reminder studies were 7.9% (95% CI = 6.5%-9.4%) and 10.8% (95% CI = 8.1%-13.6%), respectively. The results strongly suggest that GPs should make use of GP and patient reminder systems.

Continuity of Patient Care↗

PubMedDate not supplied

ClinfoTracker: a generalizable prompting tool for primary care.

BACKGROUND: ClinfoTracker is a prompt and reminder system designed as a platform for the study of the cognitive aspects of prompting in primary care. We examined the impact of ClinfoTracker in three practices and its potential for studying primary care clinicians' use of prompt and reminder systems. METHODS: We studied ClinfoTracker in three practices using an observational design. We measured performance rates of three services during the course of 5 years in one practice and prompt response rates in all three practices for 5 months after implementation. We performed qualitative cognitive task analyses of ClinfoTracker use. RESULTS: Five-year compliance rates increased for fecal occult blood testing (1996-2000, 22.5%, P = .0037; 1997-2000, 23.5%, P = .0024) and type 2 diabetes retinopathy testing (1997-2000, 15.7%, P = .0004; 1998-2000, 16.9%, P = .0001; 1999-2000, 12.4%, P = .0048). ClinfoTracker response rates from the three practices showed significant increases during 5 months (P < .0001). Significant differences seen between practice response rates indicate variable success in ClinfoTracker implementation. Cognitive task analyses performed at site 1 indicate differences in how ClinfoTracker prompts are incorporated into practice. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in preventive and disease management services after implementation show the potential of ClinfoTracker. Differences in implementation between practice sites and observations of individual clinicians show the promise ClinfoTracker holds for studying clinician use of prompt and reminder systems.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2006

Providers' beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors before implementing a computerized pneumococcal vaccination reminder.

BACKGROUND: The emergency department (ED) has been recommended as a suitable setting for offering pneumococcal vaccination; however, implementations of ED vaccination programs remain scarce. OBJECTIVES: To understand beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors of ED providers before implementing a computerized reminder system. METHODS: An anonymous, five-point Likert-scale, 46-item survey was administered to emergency physicians and nurses at an academic medical center. The survey included aspects of ordering patterns, implementation strategies, barriers, and factors considered important for an ED-based vaccination initiative as well as aspects of implementing a computerized vaccine-reminder system. RESULTS: Among 160 eligible ED providers, the survey was returned by 64 of 67 physicians (96%), and all 93 nurses (100%). The vaccine was considered to be cost effective by 71% of physicians, but only 2% recommended it to their patients. Although 98% of physicians accessed the computerized problem list before examining the patient, only 28% reviewed the patient's health-maintenance section. Physicians and nurses preferred a computerized vaccination-reminder system in 93% and 82%, respectively. Physicians' preferred implementation approach included a nurse standing order, combined with physician notification; nurses, however, favored a physician order. Factors for improving vaccination rates included improved computerized documentation, whereas increasing the number of ED staff was less important. Relevant implementation barriers for physicians were not remembering to offer vaccination, time constraints, and insufficient time to counsel patients. The ED was believed to be an appropriate setting in which to offer vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency department staff had favorable attitudes toward an ED-based pneumococcal vaccination program; however, considerable barriers inherent to the ED setting may challenge such a program. Applying information technology may overcome some barriers and facilitate an ED-based vaccination initiative.

Academic Medical Centers↗

PubMed2006

A comparison of anesthesiology resident and faculty electronic evaluations before and after implementation of automated electronic reminders.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To develop an automated e-mail reminder system to contact residents and faculty regarding incomplete evaluations. DESIGN, SETTING, INTERVENTION, AND MEASUREMENTS: In the retrospective study, two 9-month periods were evaluated representing pre- and post-introduction of the automated e-mail reminder system. Data collected contained the number of evaluations completed and the rating of residents and faculty at the University of Michigan Health System in 5 different categories on a 5-point scale. MAIN RESULTS: The use of electronic reminders resulted in a nearly 4-fold increase in the number of resident evaluations by faculty from 1050 to 3761. Faculty completing evaluations increased from 40 (61%) to 66 (100%). The mean evaluation scores showed statistically significant but clinically negligible change for resident judgement, interpersonal skills, and intraoperative management. Resident preoperative evaluation and knowledge did not show statistically significant changes. Residents completing evaluations of faculty increased from 244 to 1798, and the number of residents completing evaluations rose from 40 (56%) to 87 (100%). There were no statistically significant changes in the evaluation of faculty except in the category of feedback. CONCLUSION: An automated e-mail reminder system implemented to contact residents and faculty regarding incomplete evaluations for residents and faculty dramatically enhanced participation in the evaluation process.

Anesthesiology↗

PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of the effects of computer and manual reminders on compliance with a mental health clinical practice guideline.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative effectiveness of computer and manual reminder systems on the implementation of a clinical practice guideline. DESIGN: Seventy-eight outpatients in a mental health clinic were randomly assigned within clinician to one of the two reminder systems. The computer system, called CaseWalker, reminded clinicians when guideline-recommended screening for mood disorder was due, ensured the fidelity of the diagnosis of major depressive disorder to criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV), and generated a progress note. The manual system was a checklist inserted in the paper medical record. MEASURES: Screening rates for mood disorder and the completeness of the documentation of which DSM-IV criteria were met by patients who were said to have major depressive disorder were compared. RESULTS: The CaseWalker, compared with the paper checklist, resulted in a higher screening rate for mood disorder (86.5 vs. 61 percent, P = 0.008) and a higher rate of complete documentation of DSM-IV criteria (100 vs. 5.6 percent, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In an outpatient mental health clinic, computer reminders were shown to be superior to manual reminders in improving adherence to a clinical practice guideline for depression.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2004

Design and acceptability of patient-oriented computerized diabetes care reminders for use at the point of care.

Despite the widespread availability of guidelines for caring for patients with diabetes and decades of research on computerized reminder systems, large gaps in quality remain in diabetes care remain and computerized reminder systems are rarely used for patients with diabetes. We set out to develop and test the feasibility of a system that would overcome many of the barriers preventing the widespread use of point-of-care computerized reminders to improve diabetes care. Five primary care physicians and 32 patients with type 2 diabetes pilot tested the system. We set out to design and measure the preliminary acceptability of patient-oriented point of care computerized diabetes care reminders. The main findings of our study were that (1) the reports were well accepted by both patients and providers and (2) survey and audiotape data suggest that they may be helpful at improving the quality of outpatient care for patients with diabetes.

Ambulatory Care↗

PubMed1996

Representing CARE rules in a decision-theoretic formalism.

Improvement in the performance of reminder systems may be facilitated by the use of new representations. A decision-theoretic representation, for example, may enable a reminder system to represent and reason about the probabilities that a reminder will be a true or a false alarm and the relative utilities of these events. We extended a previously described decision-theoretic model to include such events. The model now represents explicitly the uncertainty, costs, and benefits of sending a reminder. We also extended the model to remove an assumption of reminder independence. As a step towards testing a hypothesis that this approach will support better performance than a rule-based approach, we analyzed a set of CARE rules and showed that our representation can represent these rules.

Decision Support Techniques↗