PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “SCHAMBERG'S DISEASE”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

77 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Influence of LDL apheresis on LDL subtypes in patients with coronary heart disease and severe hyperlipoproteinemia.

Epidemiologic studies and in vitro experiments indicate that low density lipoprotein (LDL) subtypes differ concerning their atherogenic potential. Small, dense LDL are more atherogenic than large, buoyant LDL. LDL apheresis is a potent therapeutic modality to lower elevated LDL-cholesterol. It is unknown whether such therapy induces a shift in the LDL subtype distribution. In this study we evaluated the influence of LDL apheresis on the LDL subtype distribution in patients with CHD and familial hypercholesterolemia (FH, n = 22), combined hyperlipidemia (CHLP, n = 6), or Lp[a]-hyperlipoproteinemia (Lp[a]-HLP, n = 4) regularly treated by LDL apheresis (immunoadsorption (n = 14), HELP apheresis (n = 8), dextran sulfate adsorption (n = 7), cascade filtration (n = 3)). On the basis of 6 LDL subfractions (d 1.020;-1.057 g/mL) isolated by density gradient ultracentrifugation the LDL-density profile was determined in each patient before and after apheresis. There was a relative increase of LDL-subfractions 1, 2, and 3 (P < 0.01, P < 0. 05, and P < 0.01, respectively) and a concomitant decrease of LDL subfractions 5 and 6 (P < 0.05) after apheresis. Subgroup analysis indicates that the degree of the small, dense LDL reduction was much more prominent in patients with CHLP compared to patients with FH or Lp[a]-HLP, whereas the type of apheresis technique had no effect. The extent of small, dense LDL reduction correlated with the preapheresis concentrations of small, dense LDL and triglycerides but not with the extent of triglyceride reduction.We conclude that LDL apheresis not only decreases LDL mass, but also improves LDL-density profile, particularly in patients with CHLP.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Purpuric generalized lichen nitidus: an unusual eruption simulating pigmented purpuric dermatosis.

BACKGROUND: Generalized haemorrhagic lichen nitidus is rare. To our knowledge, this form of presentation has only been reported once. OBJECTIVE: To describe a new case of generalized haemorrhagic lichen nitidus simulating a pigmented purpuric dermatosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We document a 24-year-old man who presented with an 8-month history of a progressive non-pruritic, red-brown papular eruption on the dorsa of the feet, ankles and distal third of the legs. A diagnosis of Schamberg's progressive pigmentary dermatosis was made, and no treatment was prescribed. Two months later, the lesions had extended to the abdomen, groins, forearms, elbows and wrists. Biopsy of the skin of the right foot revealed lesions typical of lichen nitidus with subepidermal extravasation of red cells and capillary wall hyalinization. Macrophages and T lymphocytes were abundant in the infiltrate. CONCLUSION: Purpuric generalized lichen nitidus should be included in the differential diagnosis of pigmented purpuric dermatoses.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2003

["Screening" in special situations. Assessing predictive genetic screening for hereditary breast and colorectal cancer].

AIMS AND METHODS: The aim of this health technology assessment was to analyse the current scientific and genetic counselling on predictive genetic testing for hereditary breast and colorectal cancer. Predictive genetic testing will be available for several common diseases in the future and questions related to financial issues and quality standards will be raised. This report is based on a systematic/nonsystematic literature search in several databases (e.g. EmBase, Medline, Cochrane Library) and on a specific health technology assessment report (CCOHTA) and review (American Gastroenterological Ass.), respectively. Laboratory test methods, early detection methods and the benefit from prophylactic interventions were analysed and social consequences interpreted. BACKGROUND: Breast and colorectal cancer are counted among the most frequently cancer diseases. Most of them are based on random accumulation of risk factors, 5-10% show a familial determination. A hereditary modified gene is responsible for the increased cancer risk. In these families, high tumour frequency, young age at diagnosis and multiple primary tumours are remarkable. RESULTS AND REFLECTION: GENETIC DIAGNOSIS: Sequence analysis is the gold standard. Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography is a quick alternative method. The identification of the responsible gene defect in an affected family member is important. If the test result is positive there is an uncertainty whether the disease will develop or not, when and in which degree, which is founded in the geno-/phenotype correlation. The individual risk estimation is based upon empirical evidence. The test results affect the whole family. PREVENTION/EARLY DETECTION: Currently, primary prevention is possible for familial adenomatous polyposis (celecoxib, prophylactic colectomy) and for hereditary mamma carcinoma (prophylactic mastectomy). The so-called preventive medical check-ups are early detection examinations. The evidence about early detection methods for colorectal cancer is better than for breast cancer. PROPHYLACTIC SURGICAL INTERVENTIONS: Prophylactic mastectomy (PM) reduces the relative breast cancer risk by approximately 90%. The question is if PM has an impact on mortality. The acceptance of PM is culture-dependent. Colectomy can be used as a prophylactic (FAP) and therapeutic method. After surgery, the cancer risk remains high and so early detection examinations are still necessary. EVIDENCE-BASED STATEMENTS: The evidence is often fragmentary and of limited quality. For objective test result presentation information about sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and number needed to screen and treat, respectively, are necessary. REFLECTIONS: New identification of mutations and demand will lead to an increase of predictive genetic counselling and testing. There is a gap between predictive genetic diagnosis and prediction, prevention, early detection and surgical interventions. These circumstances require a basic strategy. Since predictive genetic diagnosis is a very sensitive issue it is important to deal with it carefully in order to avoid inappropriate hopes. Thus, media, experts and politicians need to consider opportunities and limitations in their daily decision-making processes.

Breast Neoplasms↗