PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “STUDENT DROPOUTS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

'I don't want to be a psychiatric nurse': an exploration of factors inhibiting recruitment to psychiatric nursing in Ireland.

Ireland has experienced a decline in recruitment to preregistration psychiatric nursing programmes (An Bord Altranais 1999). Social care workers often do similar psychosocial work with similar client groups served by psychiatric nurses. In marked contrast to psychiatric nursing, Irish social care diplomate and degree programmes are generally over subscribed. Yet graduates working in social care often experience inferiority in terms of pay, conditions and career structure compared to their psychiatric nursing counterparts (McElwee 1998). The question that therefore needs to be asked is why school leavers opt for such courses in preference to psychiatric nursing. This article describes the results of a pilot study, utilizing a focus group approach, to examine reasons for course and career choice among school leavers, psychiatric nursing students and social care students. Results indicate that school students rely on stereotypical views as part of their decisionmaking process in shaping occupational decisions. School students tend to conceptualize psychiatric nursing as being a job involving menial and physical tasks. Social care students saw psychiatric nursing as lacking autonomy and to be institutional in nature. Psychiatric nursing students themselves felt exploited and 'second class' compared to general nurses. Current recruitment campaigns and careers guidance within schools need to be more targeted on differentiating psychiatric nursing from its general nursing counterpart.

Career Choice↗

School refusal and depression with school inattendance in children and adolescents: comparative assessment between the Children's Depression Inventory and somatic complaints.

School refusal has become a relatively common problem of increasing magnitude in Japan. Although clarification of the relationship between 'school refusal' and 'depression with school inattendance' is crucial in light of the difference in treatment modalities involved, it is not clear whether the two are to be regarded along the same tangent or as disparate entities. For clarification, a comparison was made between clinical diagnosis, Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) scores, and scores for the three subordinate scales of the CDI in 34 cases of school refusal, 10 cases of depression with school inattendance, and normal students. Significant difference in CDI score was noted between the three groups: highest among depression cases, followed by school refusers, and lowest in normal students. A larger proportion of school refusers expressed somatic complaints together with low CDI scores. The typical case of school refusal appears to exhibit somatic complaints in the foreground rather than depression, both clinical characteristics and CDI scores indicate school refusal and depression to be separate entities. Although many approaches are being taken in the treatment of school refusal, the results appear to justify primacy of the psychotherapeutic approach with the possible adjuvant use of pharmacological agents, for the phenomenon as it presents in Japan.

Adolescent↗

Study on feelings of school avoidance, depression, and character tendencies among general junior high and high school students.

School refusal is a phenomenon that first drew attention in Japan around 1960 and it remains one of the major issues in child psychiatry today. Moreover, it is now said that there exists a large group of latent school refusers currently attending school but harboring feelings of school avoidance. To address this issue, a questionnaire survey was conducted on students enrolled in a junior high and high school affiliated with the Nagoya University School of Education. The questionnaire consisted of the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI), a scale for evaluating feelings of school avoidance (School Avoidance Scale), and a scale for assessment of personality characteristics associated with school refusal (School Refusal Personality Scale). The subjects were 425 first-year junior high to second-year high school students. Factor analysis of each scale revealed the CDI to consist of three factors: 'core depression', 'feelings of interpersonal maladaptation', and 'self-revulsion', and the School Avoidance Scale to consist of two factors: 'school dislike', and 'school avoidance'. The School Refusal Personality Scale consisted of three factors: 'obsessive-compulsive', 'passive/unsocial', and 'socially introverted'. Mean CDI score and standard deviation (SD) was 19.44 +/- 7.49, and that for 'feelings of school avoidance' was 20.18 +/- 5.61. The two subordinate factors of the School Avoidance Scale were intimately associated with both 'feelings of interpersonal maladaptation' and 'core depression' of the CDI, and negatively correlated with the 'obsessive-compulsive' factor of the School Refusal Personality Scale.

Adolescent↗

Legal aspects of grading and student progression.

In today's litigious environment, nurse educators must understand the legal issues involved in determining grades and deciding academic progression. Although the courts have consistently ruled that educators are the most qualified people to evaluate what constitutes academic success, the potential remains for students to legally challenge their grades. This article reviews legal cases and shows the change in the student-institution relationship from one of a child-surrogate parent (in loco parentis) to one in which students' rights and institutional responsibility are balanced. The courts continue to support the concept that educators are uniquely qualified to make determinations concerning grading and progression and defer to decisions made by the academic community. However, a series of legal decisions based on due process and contract law now protects students from arbitrary and capricious decisions made without a formal grievance process. The implications for nurse educators and administrators are far-reaching and include such issues as specific policies within syllabi, divisional policies, institutional policies, and adherence to formal grievance procedures.

Civil Rights↗

'Knowing your place': student midwives' views of relationships in midwifery in Ireland.

OBJECTIVE: to explore the feelings and views of student midwives of their education as they progressed through their two-year programme in Ireland, with the intention of interpreting and understanding the working and learning world of the participants so that future students might be assisted to improve their educational experiences. DESIGN: phenomenology, using the technique of triangulation in a number of ways. SETTING: all seven midwifery schools in Southern Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: all students in the first intake of 1995 in every midwifery school in Ireland (n=125). DATA COLLECTION: individual and group interviews, diary-keeping and questionnaires. KEY CONCLUSIONS: the findings presented in this paper illustrate the students' views of their relationships with qualified midwives and obstetricians. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: an attitude of respect for all students needs to be fostered in hospitals educating midwives if we are to produce caring midwives in the future. The new, extended programme of midwifery education in Ireland should include an emphasis on communication skills and conflict management. A re-organisation of the hierarchical structures evident in midwifery management would lead to an improvement in the experiences of students and childbearing women alike.

Adult↗

Student discontinuations: is the system failing?

Are nurse educators guilty of hypocrisy? While espousing holism and evidence-based practice, we may be neglecting to support the most distressed and vulnerable in our care--students. Student discontinuation arouses strong emotions, which need to be expressed and resolved. These are often unresolved leaving students and educators frustrated and alienated in 'failure'. Although it cannot be expected that all students will succeed as professionals and academic standards must be maintained, those who fail have a right to expect fairness. With the advent of Subject Quality Review (formally TQA) institutions of higher education may be asked to demonstrate their operational mechanisms for 'managing' the process of student failure. Now would be the best time for departments of nurse education to reflect on experience, review attrition rates and learn from each other in order to establish a model of best practice. Such a review may generate the formulation of national guidelines, safe guarding against the looming threat of litigation.

Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate↗

Discontinuation, leaving reasons and course evaluation comments of students on the common foundation programme.

There is considerable financial incentive, at all levels, to reduce student nurse wastage and maintain recruitment to a workforce of professional nurses. This strategy is being pursued in a period following major educational change, when the attrition levels and leaving reasons of students need to be reassessed. Previous reports have identified a high voluntary loss of students on the common foundation programme (CFP) of the pre-registration nursing course. In order to achieve a better understanding of the basic problems faced by student nurses who consider leaving the CFP, questionnaires were distributed to three groups of students: current CFP students; students who had completed the CFP; and students who had discontinued training. The questionnaire responses show that course-based problems, identified as prime leaving reasons by the current and completed student groups, differ from the actual leaving reasons of discontinued students obtained by exit questionnaire. The attitudes of participating and discontinued students to theory, clinical and pastoral components of the CFP are not dissimilar. Some trends in attrition rate relate significantly to student category. Our results have implications for the management of student nurse attrition.

Adult↗

Student nurse satisfaction: implications for the common foundation programme.

This decade has seen a major restructuring of pre-registration nurse education within the higher education system that was costly and initially largely unpopular with qualified nurses and students. Major flaws have been identified in the common foundation programme (CFP) and student attrition rates remain too high. Our detailed survey of student satisfaction within the CFP shows that clinical placement is the most popular course component and that poor organization remains the worst aspect of the course. Teaching was more highly regarded than the organizational component of the course, although students found room for improvement. Core teaching modules such as bioscience and nursing interventions achieved better ratings than supporting modules, for example social policy or research and reflection on practice. The establishment of contact between personal tutors and students appeared to be slow. The described deficiencies have since been addressed in curriculum planning and the development of new course structure.

Adult↗

Student nurse attrition from pre-registration courses: investigating methodological issues.

There has been increasing recent interest in student nurse attrition. Despite a long history of research into the problem, attrition rates remain a cause for concern. This paper presents a review of the research undertaken in the UK, together with an international comparison. The foci of previous studies have been diverse and have included investigation of students' leaving reasons, their experience of stress, and course-related difficulties of students in progress. This review illustrates the complexity of issues surrounding student nurse discontinuation, highlighting a number of methodological limitations of prior research. These include the lack of a common definition of attrition, low response rates in surveys, and the imprecise definition of categories of leaving reasons. There is also a dearth of studies based on the perspectives of students. In the UK there is little documentation of whether measures have been adopted to reduce attrition and there is no evidence of evaluation. If future research is to be aimed at reducing attrition, these conceptual and methodological issues need to be addressed.

Education, Nursing↗

Student nurse attrition: use of an exit-interview procedure to determine students' leaving reasons.

This study is part of a research programme at the University of Glamorgan aimed at reducing student nurse discontinuation. A number of methodological limitations in previous studies on attrition have been identified and are addressed in this study. A preliminary picture of attrition within this school is established and the validity of the data examined. The average attrition rate for the school over an 8-year period was 19%, which compares favourably with national rates. Data on students' leaving reasons were obtained through an exit-interview procedure; this achieved high response rates which for exceed those represented in previous studies. Academic difficulties and wrong career choice were among the most commonly reported leaving reasons; this is similar to findings from previous research. However family, health and financial difficulties emerge as equally important categories. The exit form facilitated the recording of multiple leaving reasons for each student, an innovative approach in attrition research. Almost half the students discontinued for at least two reasons; the interrelationships between leaving reasons and possible explanations for the findings are considered. The complexity of factors contributing to attrition are discussed and will be tackled in subsequent stages of the research programme.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗