SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Signal Recognition Particle”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Conformational variability of the GTPase domain of the signal recognition particle receptor FtsY.

The prokaryotic signal recognition particle Ffh and its receptor FtsY allow targeting of proteins into or across the plasma membrane. The targeting process is GTP dependent and the two proteins constitute a distinct GTPase family. The receptor FtsY is composed of A and NG domains where the NG's GTPase domain plays a critical role in the targeting process. In this study, we describe two X-ray structures determined independently of each other of the NG domain of FtsY from Mycoplasma mycoides (MmFtsY). The two structures are markedly different in three of the nucleotide-binding segments, GI (P-loop), GII, and GIII, making only one of the structures compatible with nucleotide binding. Interestingly, the two distinct conformations of the nucleotide-binding segments of MmFtsY are similar to the apo- and ADP-loaded forms of certain ATPases. The structure of the extended interface between the A and NG domains of MmFtsY provides new insights into the role of the A domain for phospholipid interaction.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

PubMed1987

Mutations in the NH2-terminal domain of the signal peptide of preproparathyroid hormone inhibit translocation without affecting interaction with signal recognition particle.

The amino-terminal domain of a eukaryotic signal peptide, from bovine parathyroid hormone, was altered by in vitro mutagenesis of the cDNA. The function of "internalized" signal sequence mutants and of deletion mutants was assayed using an in vitro translation-translocation system. The addition of 11 amino acids to the NH2 terminus of the signal peptide did not prevent normal processing of the precursor protein, whereas a 23-amino acid extension blocked processing. These data suggest that the NH2-terminal sequences of internal signal peptides must be permissive of the signal function. Deletion of 6 NH2-terminal amino acids from the signal peptide had no effect on its cleavage by microsomal membranes, but removal of 10 or 13 amino acids, including all charged residues prior to the hydrophobic core, prevented processing. For both the extension and deletion mutations, processed proteins were protected from proteolytic digestion, whereas unprocessed forms were not, which indicated that the unprocessed mutant proteins were not translocated across the microsomal membrane. Translation of both the extension and deletion translocation-deficient mutants was arrested by signal recognition particle, and salt-washed microsomal membranes reversed the translational arrest. These data demonstrate that the NH2-terminal domain is not required for the interaction of signal recognition particle with the signal peptide or with signal recognition particle receptor, but is required for formation of a maximally translocation-competent complex with the microsomal membrane.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2003

Signal recognition particle binds to ribosome-bound signal sequences with fluorescence-detected subnanomolar affinity that does not diminish as the nascent chain lengthens.

The binding of signal recognition particle (SRP) to ribosome-bound signal sequences has been characterized directly and quantitatively using fluorescence spectroscopy. A fluorescent probe was incorporated cotranslationally into the signal sequence of a ribosome.nascent chain complex (RNC), and upon titration with SRP, a large and saturable increase in fluorescence intensity was observed. Spectral analyses of SRP and RNC association as a function of concentration allowed us to measure, at equilibrium, K(d) values of 0.05-0.38 nm for SRP.RNC complexes with different signal sequences. Competitive binding experiments with nonfluorescent RNC species revealed that the nascent chain probe did not alter SRP affinity and that SRP has significant affinity for both nontranslating ribosomes (K(d) = 71 nm) and RNCs that lack an exposed signal sequence (K(d) = 8 nm). SRP can therefore distinguish between translating and nontranslating ribosomes. The very high signal sequence-dependent SRP.RNC affinity did not decrease as the nascent chain lengthened. Thus, the inhibition of SRP-dependent targeting of RNCs to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane observed with long nascent chains does not result from reduced SRP binding to the signal sequence, as widely thought, but rather from a subsequent step, presumably nascent chain interference of SRP.RNC association with the SRP receptor and/or translocon.

Animals↗

PubMed1986

A signal sequence is required for the functions of the signal recognition particle.

It is shown that removal of the signal sequence of carp preproinsulin by gene technology abolishes the interaction between the polypeptide chain and the signal recognition particle with respect to both its functions: the inhibition of translation by the signal recognition particle in the absence of microsomal membranes, and the reconstitution of the protein translocation competence of high-salt inactivated microsomes. It is concluded that a signal sequence is absolutely required for the functions of the signal recognition particle.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

Regulation by the ribosome of the GTPase of the signal-recognition particle during protein targeting.

The signal-recognition particle (SRP) is important for the targeting of many secretory and membrane proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Targeting is regulated by three GTPases, the 54K subunit of SRP (SRP54), and the alpha- and beta-subunits of the SRP receptor. When a signal sequence emerges from the ribosome, SRP interacts with it and targets the resulting complex to the ER membrane by binding to the SRP receptor. Subsequently, SRP releases the signal sequence into the translocation channel. Here we use a complex of a ribosome with a nascent peptide chain, the SRP and its receptor, to investigate GTP binding to SRP54, and GTP hydrolysis. Our findings indicate that a ribosomal component promotes GTP binding to the SRP54 subunit of SRP. GTP-bound SRP54 is essential for high-affinity interaction between SRP and its receptor in the ER membrane. This interaction induces the release of the signal sequence from SRP, the insertion of the nascent polypeptide chain into the translocation channel, and GTP hydrolysis. The contribution of the ribosome had previously escaped detection because only synthetic signal peptides were used in the analysis.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed1991

A basic region neighboring the lysine-rich C-terminus of protein SRP19 is required for binding to signal recognition particle RNA.

To identify some of the determinants in the 19-kilodalton protein of signal recognition particle (SRP19) for binding to signal recognition particle RNA, two mutant derivatives of the SRP19 were constructed, lacking 14 and 24 C-terminal amino acids. Polypeptides were transcribed and translated in vitro and tested for their ability to bind to signal recognition particle RNA by retention of protein-RNA complexes on DEAE-Sepharose. Both mutant polypeptides form complexes with the RNA, demonstrating that the 24 C-terminal amino acids, which include a lysine-rich sequence at positions 136-144, are dispensable. A third mutant polypeptide, in which eight additional amino acids were removed by oligonucleotide-directed digestion of the mRNA, was unable to bind. The amino acids in the sequence PKLKTRTQ correspond to positions 113-120; they are suggested to be involved in interaction with signal recognition particle RNA.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1998

Interaction of guanine nucleotides with the signal recognition particle from Escherichia coli.

The bacterial signal recognition particle (SRP) is an RNA-protein complex. In Escherichia coli, the particle consists of a 114 nt RNA, a 4.5S RNA, and a 48 kDa GTP-binding protein, Ffh. GDP-GTP exchange on, and GTP hydrolysis by, Ffh are thought to regulate SRP function in membrane targeting of translating ribosomes. In the present paper, we report the equilibrium and kinetic constants of guanine nucleotide binding to Ffh in different functional complexes. The association and dissociation rate constants of GTP/GDP binding to Ffh were measured using a fluorescent analogue of GTP/GDP, mant-GTP/GDP. For both nucleotides, association and dissociation rate constants were about 10(6) M-1 s-1 and 10 s-1, respectively. The equilibrium constants of nonmodified GTP and GDP binding to Ffh alone and in SRP, and in the complex with the ribosomes were measured by competition with mant-GDP. In all cases, the same 1-2 microM affinity for GTP and GDP was observed. Binding of both GTP and GDP to Ffh was independent of Mg2+ ions. The data suggest that, at conditions in vivo, (i) there will be rapid spontaneous GDP-GTP exchange, and (ii) the GTP-bound form of Ffh, or of SRP, will be predominant.

Bacterial Proteins↗

PubMed2004

Simultaneous binding of trigger factor and signal recognition particle to the E. coli ribosome.

Signal recognition particle (SRP) and trigger factor (TF) both bind to ribosomal protein L23 at the peptide exit area on the 50S subunit of the E. coli ribosome. In this study, we have developed a spin-down assay and used it to estimate KD values and the corresponding enthalpies for the binding of radio-labelled SRP and TF to naked ribosomes and to ribosomes carrying a tetrapeptidyl-tRNA in the P site. At 20 degrees C, the KD value for TF binding is 2 microM and for SRP it is 170 nM for naked as well as for translating ribosomes. At 4 degrees C, the KD values for TF and SRP binding are 1.1 microM and 90 nM, respectively. Competition binding experiments reveal that SRP and TF bind simultaneously to the ribosome with little affinity interference, showing that the factors have separate binding sites on L23. This makes an alternating binding mode for TF and SRP less plausible.

Binding Sites↗

PubMed1999

Arabidopsis mutants lacking the 43- and 54-kilodalton subunits of the chloroplast signal recognition particle have distinct phenotypes.

The chloroplast signal recognition particle (cpSRP) is a protein complex consisting of 54- and 43-kD subunits encoded by the fifty-four chloroplast, which encodes cpSRP54 (ffc), and chaos (cao) loci, respectively. Two new null alleles in the ffc locus have been identified. ffc1-1 is caused by a stop codon in exon 10, while ffc1-2 has a large DNA insertion in intron 8. ffc mutants have yellow first true leaves that subsequently become green. The reaction center proteins D1, D2, and psaA/B, as well as seven different light-harvesting chlorophyll proteins (LHCPs), were found at reduced levels in the young ffc leaves but at wild-type levels in the older leaves. The abundance of the two types of LHCP was unaffected by the mutation, while two others were increased in the absence of cpSRP54. Null mutants in the cao locus contain reduced levels of the same subset of LHCP proteins as ffc mutants, but are distinguishable in four ways: young leaves are greener, the chlorophyll a/b ratio is elevated, levels of reaction center proteins are normal, and there is no recovery in the level of LHCPs in the adult plant. The data suggest that cpSRP54 and cpSRP43 have some nonoverlapping roles and that alternative transport pathways can compensate for the absence of a functional cpSRP.

Alleles↗

PubMed2004

The conserved adenosine in helix 6 of Archaeoglobus fulgidus signal recognition particle RNA initiates SRP assembly.

The signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA helix 6 of archaea and eukaryotes is essential for the binding of protein SRP19 and the assembly of a functional complex. The conserved adenosine at the third position of the tetraloop of helix 6 (A149) is crucial for the binding of protein SRP19 in the mammalian SRP. Here we investigated the significance of the equivalent adenosine residue at position 159 (A159) of Archaeoglobus fulgidus SRP RNA. The A159 of A. fulgidus and A149 of human SRP RNA were changed to C, G or U, and fragments containing helix 6 or helices 6 and 8 were synthesized by run-off transcription with T7 RNA polymerase. The ability of recombinant A. fulgidus and human SRP19 to form ribonucleoprotein complexes was measured in vitro. The simultaneous presence of A149 and helix 8 is required for the high-affinity binding of SRP19 to the human SRP RNA. In contrast, A. fulgidus SRP19 binds to the SRP RNA fragments with high affinity irrespective of the nature of the nucleotide, demonstrating that A159 does not directly participate in protein binding. Instead, as indicated by the resistance of the wild-type A. fulgidus RNA towards digestion by RNase A, this residue allows the formation of a tightly folded RNA molecule. The high affinity between A.fulgidus SRP 19 and RNA molecules that contain both helices 6 and 8 suggests that A159 is likely to initiate archaeal SRP assembly by forming a conserved tertiary RNA-RNA interaction.

Adenosine↗

PubMed2000

Signal recognition particle components in the nucleolus.

The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a ribonucleoprotein composed of an Alu domain and an S domain. The S domain contains unique sequence SRP RNA and four SRP proteins: SRP19, SRP54, SRP68, and SRP72. SRP interacts with ribosomes to bring translating membrane and secreted proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) for proper processing. Additionally, SRP RNA is a member of a family of small nonribosomal RNAs found recently in the nucleolus, suggesting that the nucleolus is more plurifunctional than previously realized. It was therefore of interest to determine whether other SRP components localize to this intranuclear site. In transfected rat fibroblasts, green fluorescent protein fusions of SRP19, SRP68, and SRP72 localized to the nucleolus, as well as to the cytoplasm, as expected. SRP68 also accumulated in the ER, consistent with its affinity for the ER-bound SRP receptor. SRP54 was detected in the cytoplasm as a green fluorescent protein fusion and in immunofluorescence studies, but was not detected in the nucleolus. In situ hybridization experiments also revealed endogenous SRP RNA in the nucleolus. These results demonstrate that SRP RNA and three SRP proteins visit the nucleolus, suggesting that partial SRP assembly, or another unidentified activity of the SRP components, occurs at the nucleolus. SRP54 apparently interacts with nascent SRP beyond the nucleolus, consistent with in vitro reconstitution experiments showing that SRP19 must bind to SRP RNA before SRP54 binds. Our findings support the notion that the nucleolus is the site of assembly and/or interaction between the family of ribonucleoproteins involved in protein synthesis, in addition to ribosomes themselves.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Substrate twinning activates the signal recognition particle and its receptor.

Signal sequences target proteins for secretion from cells or for integration into cell membranes. As nascent proteins emerge from the ribosome, signal sequences are recognized by the signal recognition particle (SRP), which subsequently associates with its receptor (SR). In this complex, the SRP and SR stimulate each other's GTPase activity, and GTP hydrolysis ensures unidirectional targeting of cargo through a translocation pore in the membrane. To define the mechanism of reciprocal activation, we determined the 1.9 A structure of the complex formed between these two GTPases. The two partners form a quasi-two-fold symmetrical heterodimer. Biochemical analysis supports the importance of the extensive interaction surface. Complex formation aligns the two GTP molecules in a symmetrical, composite active site, and the 3'OH groups are essential for association, reciprocal activation and catalysis. This unique circle of twinned interactions is severed twice on hydrolysis, leading to complex dissociation after cargo delivery.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2002

The presence of a helix breaker in the hydrophobic core of signal sequences of secretory proteins prevents recognition by the signal-recognition particle in Escherichia coli.

Signal sequences often contain alpha-helix-destabilizing amino acids within the hydrophobic core. In the precursor of the Escherichia coli outer-membrane protein PhoE, the glycine residue at position -10 (Gly-10) is thought to be responsible for the break in the alpha-helix. Previously, we showed that substitution of Gly-10 by alpha-helix-promoting residues (Ala, Cys or Leu) reduced the proton-motive force dependency of the translocation of the precursor, but the actual role of the helix breaker remained obscure. Here, we considered the possibility that extension of the alpha-helical structure in the signal sequence resulting from the Gly-10 substitutions affects the targeting pathway of the precursor. Indeed, the mutations resulted in reduced dependency on SecB for targeting in vivo. In vitro cross-linking experiments revealed that the G-10L and G-10C mutant PhoE precursors had a dramatically increased affinity for P48, one of the constituents of the signal-recognition particle (SRP). Furthermore, in vitro cross-linking experiments revealed that the G-10L mutant protein is routed to the SecYEG translocon via the SRP pathway, the targeting pathway that is exploited by integral inner-membrane proteins. Together, these data indicate that the helix breaker in cleavable signal sequences prevents recognition by SRP and is thereby, together with the hydrophobicity of the signal sequence, a determinant of the targeting pathway.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1993

Characterization of a chloroplast homologue of the 54-kDa subunit of the signal recognition particle.

Proteins and RNAs homologous to components of the eukaryotic signal recognition particle (SRP) have been identified in a number of prokaryotic organisms. Here we report the isolation of an Arabidopsis thaliana cDNA, FFC (fifty-four chloroplast homologue), that encodes a chloroplast protein (54CP) homologous to the 54-kDa subunit of the signal recognition particle. 54CP shares 27% identity with mammalian SRP54 and 44% identity with the Escherichia coli ffh gene product suggesting a prokaryotic origin for this gene. FFC is a nuclear gene encoding a 62-kDa cytoplasmically synthesized precursor that is capable of being imported into isolated chloroplasts and processed to a 53-kDa stromal polypeptide. Antibodies generated against a portion of 54CP recognize an endogenous 53-kDa chloroplast protein that sediments at 4 S and 70 S, the latter form may be associated with ribosomes. The FFC transcript is most abundant in green shoot tissue whereas etiolated buds and roots have transcript levels about 30 and 10%, respectively, relative to light grown green shoots. By analogy with the eukaryotic signal recognition particle which targets secretory proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum, it is speculated that 54CP may target chloroplast proteins to either the thylakoid or envelope membranes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1987

Translation and membrane insertion of the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase glycoprotein of Newcastle disease virus.

The hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) protein of paramyxoviruses is likely in the unusual class of glycoproteins with the amino terminus cytoplasmic and the carboxy terminus lumenal or external to the cell. The properties of the membrane insertion of the HN protein of Newcastle disease virus, a prototype paramyxovirus, were explored in wheat germ extracts containing microsomal membranes. HN protein was inserted into membranes cotranslationally, resulting in a glycosylated protein completely resistant to trypsin and proteinase K digestion. No detectable posttranslation insertion occurred. Insertion required signal recognition particle. Signal recognition particle in the absence of membranes inhibited HN protein synthesis. Comparisons of the trypsin digestion products of the HN protein made in the cell-free system with newly synthesized HN protein from infected cells showed that the cell-free product was in a conformation different from that of the pulse-labeled protein in infected cells. First, trypsin digestion of intact membranes from infected cells reduced the size of the 74,000-dalton HN protein by approximately 1,000 daltons, whereas trypsin digestion of HN protein made in the cell-free system had no effect on the size of the protein. Second, trypsin digestion of Triton X-100-permeabilized membranes isolated from infected cells resulted in a 67,000-dalton trypsin resistant HN protein fragment. A trypsin-resistant core of comparable size was not present in the digestion products of in-vitro-synthesized HN protein. Evidence is presented that the newly synthesized HN protein in infected cels contain intramolecular disulfide bonds not present in the cell-free product.

Animals↗

PubMed2026

Signal recognition particle 14 binds to importin α in Plasmodium falciparum.

BACKGROUND: The eukaryotic signal recognition particle (SRP) consists of six proteins and one SRP RNA. This ribonucleoprotein complex assembles inside the nucleus. Nucleocytoplasmic transport is an essential process for the biogenesis of signal recognition particles (SRPs) as well as for the survival of a cell. There are studies on cells that indicate the import receptor is responsible for import of SRP proteins into nucleus, but there is a lack of evidence that SRP proteins directly bind with import receptors. METHODS AND RESULTS: Coding sequences of SRP 14 and importin α were amplified from synthesized cDNA and genomic DNA, respectively, of Plasmodium falciparum cultivated in vitro culture. The amplified products were cloned and expressed in E. coli, followed by purification. A binding study was conducted on glutathione-agarose as well as in a 96-well plate format at different concentrations of SRP 14 with immobilized importin α. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of direct binding between importin α and a eukaryotic signal recognition particle 14 (SRP 14). A cost-effective 96-well plate-based assay has also been developed to study the binding of cargoes of importin α.

Plasmodium falciparum↗

PubMed1993

GTPase domain of the 54-kD subunit of the mammalian signal recognition particle is required for protein translocation but not for signal sequence binding.

The 54-kD subunit of the signal recognition particle (SRP54) binds to signal sequences of nascent secretory and transmembrane proteins. SRP54 consists of two separable domains, a 33-kD amino-terminal domain that contains a GTP-binding site (SRP54G) and a 22-kD carboxy-terminal domain (SRP54M) containing binding sites for both the signal sequence and SRP RNA. To examine the function of the two domains in more detail, we have purified SRP54M and used it to assemble a partial SRP that lacks the amino-terminal domain of SRP54 [SRP(-54G)]. This particle recognized signal sequences in two independent assays, albeit less efficiently than intact SRP. Analysis of the signal sequence binding activity of free SRP54 and SRP54M supports the conclusion that SRP54M binds signal sequences with lower affinity than the intact protein. In contrast, when SRP(-54G) was assayed for its ability to promote the translocation of preprolactin across microsomal membranes, it was completely inactive, apparently because it was unable to interact normally with the SRP receptor. These results imply that SRP54G plays an essential role in SRP-mediated targeting of nascent chain-ribosome complexes to the ER membrane and also influences signal sequence recognition, possibly by promoting a tighter association between signal sequences and SRP54M.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Structure and assembly of the Alu domain of the mammalian signal recognition particle.

The Alu domain of the mammalian signal recognition particle (SRP) comprises the heterodimer of proteins SRP9 and SRP14 bound to the 5' and 3' terminal sequences of SRP RNA. It retards the ribosomal elongation of signal-peptide-containing proteins before their engagement with the translocation machinery in the endoplasmic reticulum. Here we report two crystal structures of the heterodimer SRP9/14 bound either to the 5' domain or to a construct containing both 5' and 3' domains. We present a model of the complete Alu domain that is consistent with extensive biochemical data. SRP9/14 binds strongly to the conserved core of the 5' domain, which forms a U-turn connecting two helical stacks. Reversible docking of the more weakly bound 3' domain might be functionally important in the mechanism of translational regulation. The Alu domain structure is probably conserved in other cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein particles and retroposition intermediates containing SRP9/14-bound RNAs transcribed from Alu repeats or related elements in genomic DNA.

Alu Elements↗