PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Subcutaneous”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Long-term effects of continuous subcutaneous infusion versus daily subcutaneous injections of growth hormone (GH) on the insulin-like growth factor system, insulin sensitivity, body composition, and bone and lipoprotein metabolism in GH-deficient adults.

It remains uncertain whether close imitation of the physiological pulsatile GH pattern determines the effects of GH treatment in humans. However, human studies have reported comparable metabolic responses to short-term constant and intermittent GH exposure. The aim of the study was to compare the metabolic effects of GH after continuous and intermittent sc delivery. In a parallel design, 14 GH-treated GH-deficient patients (mean age, 37 yr; mean body mass index, 27.4 kg/m(2)) were studied during steady state at the start of the study and after 6 months. Seven patients received daily injections (inj) in the evening as usual, and 7 received a continuous infusion (inf) of GH by means of a portable pump. The GH dose was kept unchanged before and during the study. Serum levels of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) tended to increase in the patients switched to constant infusion (from 175 +/- 36 to 209 +/- 50 microg/L), but the differences obtained during the two regimens [+34.3 (inf) vs. -11.9 (inj)] were not significant (P = 0.34). Serum levels of IGF-II (P = 0.71) and IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-3 (P = 0.75) were identical during the two modes of treatment. Serum levels of IGFBP-1 (P = 0.72), IGFBP-2 (P = 0.34), and GH-binding protein (P = 0.75) were unaffected by treatment regimen. Serum levels of free fatty acids, reflecting lipolysis, decreased significantly (16%) in the group switched to GH infusion (difference, -99.8 vs. +5 micromol/L; P < 0.03). The GH pattern did not influence insulin sensitivity (P = 0.71) or glucose effectiveness (P = 0.15) derived from Bergman's minimal model. Similarly, the two treatment regimens had no differential impact on lipoprotein levels, bone metabolism, or body composition. In conclusion, continuous and intermittent administrations of GH for 6 months are comparable with respect to the IGF-IGFBP axis, whereas intermittent exposure may be of importance for the lipolytic effect of GH. The data on insulin sensitivity and lipoproteins suggest that constant GH exposure is as safe as intermittent GH administration.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

The effect of subcutaneous infusion versus subcutaneous injections of a somatostatin analogue (SMS 201-995) on the diurnal GH profile in acromegaly.

Multiple sc injections of a long-acting somatostatin analogue (SMS 201-995) are currently used in the treatment of acromegaly. However, plasma GH concentration often reaches a pathological level (less than 5 micrograms/l) between two injections. In seven patients with active acromegaly we compared, in a short-term trial, the effect of SMS 201-995 administered by continuous sc infusion (50 micrograms and 100 micrograms a day) and by three sc injections (100 micrograms each). In six patients, plasma GH levels were significantly reduced regardless of the mode and dose of treatment (P less than 0.05). However, comparing diurnal profiles, 100 micrograms continuous sc infusion was more effective than discontinuous administration in reducing the number of GH levels above 5 micrograms/l (P less than 0.01). In two patients, continuous infusion was the only way to decrease all plasma GH values below 5 micrograms/l during the diurnal profile determination. Moreover, even when, in a long-term study, the dose of multiple injections was progressively increased to 500 micrograms three times a day, GH levels remained consistently elevated in one of these patients. Thus, in some acromegalic patients continuous sc injection seems currently the most efficient way of treatment with SMS 201-995.

Acromegaly↗
PubMed1989

[Urinary bioavailability of sodium-2-mercaptoethanesulfonate (Uromitexan) following intravenous, subcutaneous and continuous subcutaneous administration].

The dose-limiting urotoxicity of the oxazaphosphorines (t1/2 = 4-15 h) is due to renal elimination of metabolites such as acrolein. The occurrence of hemorrhagic cystitis can be safely prevented by the concomitant use of i.v. or oral 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate sodium (DCI MESNA; Uromitexane). The bioavailability of oral MESNA is in the range of 20-50% and its unpleasant taste severely limits patient compliance. Due to the short half-life of MESNA (approx. 40 min) a regular fractionated or continuous administration is mandatory. In 6 healthy volunteers we have studied the pharmacokinetics of urinary MESNA elimination for the assessment of MESNA bioavailability after i.v. and s.c. drug administration. MESNA was given at doses of 400 mg for i.v. and s.c. bolus injections and 800 mg for continuous s.c. administration by a portable infusion pump. For the s.c. route an isotonic solution was prepared. The total amount of urinary thiols was assessed by the Ellman method (photometric reading at 412 nm). Total elimination of i.v. MESNA was 83.2 +/- 3.4% of the dose administered. The respective results for s.c. bolus and s.c. continuous drug administration were 81.9 +/- 3.4% and 79.4 +/- 3.6% of the dose. Continuous administration theoretically will provide optimal uroprotection from short term (hemorrhagic cystitis) and long term (bladder fibrosis and cancer) toxicity.

Biological Availability↗