PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Vision Screening”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

User-centered development of a Web-based preschool vision screening tool.

Although amblyopia is most successfully treated when detected in early childhood, many preschool-aged children are not being screened. This project explored the delivery of Web-based vision screenings, integrated with patient education, to parents and children, aged 3 to 6 years. Through a user-centered design methodology involving requirements gathering, iterative prototype development, and usability testing, a highly usable screening Website was created. Interviewing and testing parents and children in the home were essential in gathering accurate data about environments where the tool would actually be used. Frequent iterations of designing, testing, and modifying the tool were useful in identifying and correcting usability problems. Usability goals were set early in the project, and in the final phase a satisfaction questionnaire was administered to participants. Twenty-one out of 22 final usability objectives were achieved and the feasibility of Web-based vision screening was demonstrated.

Amblyopia↗
PubMed2006

Lack of follow-up exams after failed school vision screenings: an investigation of contributing factors.

Programs to facilitate professional eye exams after failed school vision screenings often are based on the assumption that funding and access to services are major obstacles to care. Despite such programs, many children do not receive professional exams. The purpose of this study was to identify additional barriers to follow-up eye care. School nurses in an urban, midwestern public school district identified elementary school students who had not received follow-up eye exams after failed school vision screenings. Parents of these students were interviewed during the summer to determine financial, logistical, social/family, and perceptual barriers to care. Family issues, parental perceptions of vision problems, and difficulty planning ahead were found to be significant factors. Strategies to increase follow-up compliance and recommendations for overcoming barriers to care were also identified.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed2001

Vision screening of school children: should it be continued?

Vision screening of all children at school entry has been a traditional practice for many years. Recently, decisions have been made to discontinue screening and to rely on parent and teacher referral methods instead. A review of the literature suggested that parent and teacher referral methods of screening were less than satisfactory, and that professional screening of all children at school entry age should be continued.

Child↗
PubMed1978

Vision screening in children tested at 7, 11, and 16 years.

Distant vision screenings of a national sample of children were performed at the ages of 7, 11, and 16. Many children with normal vision at one screening showed defects at later screenings, and altogether 18% of children with normal vision at the age of 7 had defects by the time they were 16. Twelve per cent of those with normal vision at 7 and 11 had developed a visual defect by the age of 16. Apparent improvements between screenings probably resulted largely from technical difficulties inherent in testing young children. The results clearly indicate the importance of regular vision screening during the school years and the need for comprehensive but flexible back-up services.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Negative predictive value of a vision screening program aimed at children aged 3 to 4 years old.

PURPOSE: Nova Scotia has a vision screening program which assesses children aged 4[1\2] to 5[1\2] years. However, its use in younger children proved impossible. This study will examine a modified screening protocol for the younger children (3 to 4 years old) and determine its negative predictive value and minimum age for reliable application. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Public health nurses administered the study protocol to 3- to 4-year-old children. One hundred seventy-eight children were screened over two summers. Medical and family history, external inspection, as well as measures of visual acuity with the Lea Hyvarinen symbols chart and stereoacuity with Frisby plates were recorded. Results were compared with a gold standard examination that included full orthoptic and ophthalmologic evaluations. One hundred forty-one (79%) children underwent the gold standard examination. Agreement between screening and gold standard examinations was studied. RESULTS: Data showed increased concordance between screening and gold standard examination results with increasing age up to 41 months. Negative predictive value (NPV) and specificity also improved when data were separated by this age. In children <41 months old, the screening test NPV was 90%, specificity, 68%, and sensitivity, 75%. In comparison, children >/=41 months old had screening test NPV of 96%, specificity, 95%, and sensitivity, 50%. Specificity was higher in the older age group ( P < 0.001). Sensitivity was lower ( P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: This study's vision screening protocol appears better suited for children 41 months and older. They had better pass/fail reproducibility than children <41 months. The test's simplicity allows easy use by non-eye-care professionals. It could potentially lower the reliable screening age of children by 13 months, from 54 months of age (4[1\2] years old) to 41 months. This screening may miss some refractive errors and microtropia/monofixation syndrome, despite normal visual acuity, stereoacuity, and external inspection.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed2000

Vision screening survey of all children starting primary school in 1998 in the Federal State of Saarland, Germany.

BACKGROUND: The excellent co-operation with the pediatric public health service of the local health authorities enables us to present the collected results of a vision screening survey of all children starting primary school in 1998 in the Federal State of Saarland. The aim is to analyze the prevalence of amblyopia, strabismus, reduced visual acuity, refractive errors and severe visual impairment in one complete grade of pre-schoolers. METHODS: The examination parameters had been determined in co-operation with the Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology at the University of Saarland and had been fitted to the needs and abilities of lay persons (health workers) doing a vision screening as part of a general health check-up. Parameters were: visual acuity (Rodenstock R21), color vision (Ishihara), stereopsis (Lang), and test for latent hyperopia. Referral to an ophthalmologist if: visual acuity < 0.7; difference in visual acuity in both eyes of more than one line, or any other pathological test result. A total of 12,192 children were screened. RESULTS: The preventive pediatric examinations were complete in 5756 children (56.4%), incomplete in 4449 children (43. 6%) and in 1987 children (16.3%) the degree of completion could not be determined. Eyes: pathological findings in 41.7%. Reduced visual acuity in 30.8%, color vision defects in 1.3%, severe visual impairment in 0.3%. Pathological findings in other organ systems: skeleton 33.5%, teeth 32.6%. For the urban confederacy of Saarbrücken: referrals to ophthalmologists: n=1108. No feedback information: 380; refractive correction: 226; recommendation for regular checks: 346; no pathological findings: 156. CONCLUSION. The high percentage of pathological findings in the vision screening of 12,192 pre-schoolers is an important confirmation that there is a need for a preventive ophthalmologic examination before the age of six. Only an area-wide ophthalmologic vision screening around the second or third year of life can effectively reduce the high prevalence of pathological findings at the time of starting primary school. To improve the present screening situation, networks between ophthalmologists and pediatricians would be beneficial.

Child↗
PubMed2002

Relation between perceived driving disability and scores of vision screening tests.

AIM: To determine the relation between perceived driving disability and vision screening tests. METHODS: 93 subjects, aged 50 years and over, with binocular visual acuity of at least 20/80. Perceived driving disability (PDD) was assessed by a questionnaire. Subtracting daytime from night-time driving question scores revealed PDD at night (PDDN), subtracting scores of questions for driving in familiar places from those in unfamiliar places revealed PDD at unfamiliar places (PDDU). RESULTS: PDD was strongly related to visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and useful field of view (UFOV). Specific relations existed between PDDN and Nyktotests and Mesotests and between PDDU and UFOV. These associations were enhanced in a subset of subjects with better visual acuities. CONCLUSIONS: Vision screening tests correlate well with perceived driving disabilities, especially when a subtraction method is used in the questionnaire to reveal condition dependent disabilities. Additional tests for visual acuity are useful, especially in subjects with better visual acuity.

Automobile Driving↗