PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “budding”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Innervation of single fungiform taste buds during development in rat.

To determine whether the innervation of taste buds changes during postnatal development, the number of geniculate ganglion cells that innervated single fungiform taste buds were quantified in the tip- and midregions of the tongue of adult and developing rats. There was substantial variation in both the size of individual taste buds and number of geniculate ganglion cells that innervated them. Importantly, taste bud morphology and innervation were highly related. Namely, the number of labeled geniculate ganglion cells that innervated a taste bud was highly correlated with the size of the taste bud (r = 0.91, P < .0003): The larger the taste bud, the more geniculate ganglion cells that innervated it. The relationship between ganglion cell number and taste bud volume emerged during the first 40 days postnatal. Whereas there was no difference in the average number of ganglion cells that innervated individual taste buds in rats aged 10 days postnatal through adulthood, taste bud volumes increased progressively between 10 and 40 days postnatal, at which age taste bud volumes were similar to adults. The maturation of taste bud size was accompanied by the emergence of the relationship between taste bud volume and number of innervating neurons. Specifically, there was no correlation between taste bud size and number of innervating geniculate ganglion cells in 10-, 20-, or 30-day-old rats, whereas taste bud size and the number of innervating ganglion cells in 40-day-old rats were positively correlated (r = .80, P < .002). Therefore, the relationship between taste bud size and number of innervating ganglion cells develops over a prolonged postnatal period and is established when taste buds grow to their adult size.

Afferent Pathways↗

Bud induction in decapitated Hydra attenuata by 5-azacytidine: a morphological study.

The effect of 5-azacytidine (5-azaCR) on head regeneration and budding in hydra are reported. Hydra attenuata were exposed to various doses of 5-azaCR for 48 h and then decapitated and cultured. Head regeneration and bud formation were observed for 12 days after decapitation. Untreated control hydra regenerated heads within 7 to 8 days of decapitation with a budding index of 0.2. Buds invariably arose in the normal budding zone (below the gastric region). In the group treated with 0.8 mM-5-azaCR, 9 days after decapitation head regeneration was seen in only 13% of animals, and an average of two buds per hydra were formed, most of which were in the vicinity of the distal end. Induction of budding was also seen in the animals that regenerated heads. In animals exposed to 1 mM-5-azaCR three main types of responses were observed 9 days after decapitation. 44% of the animals regenerated normal heads; about half of them developed at least one bud and these buds originated in the budding zone. 17.5% of the animals developed abnormal, long hypostome-like structures with single or bifurcated tentacles at their tips. There were at least two buds per animal and they were invariably at abnormal sites. 32% of the animals failed to regenerate heads, although they developed two buds. 87% of these buds originated in abnormal sites of the body column and a large number (72%) did not detach even by the 12th day after decapitation. Both 5 and 10 mM of 5-azaCR were toxic to the animals; the survivors formed large globe-shaped heads. Bud induction was seen in 60% and 28% of animals in the 5 and 10 mM groups, respectively. These observations demonstrate that 5-azaCR induces bud formation in hydra at doses that inhibit head regeneration. This bud induction might be due to a specific expression of gene products responsible for bud formation.

Animals↗

Postnatal development of the vallate papilla and taste buds in rats.

The postnatal maturation of the vallate papilla and its taste buds was quantitatively investigated in rats by ligh microscopy. Specifically, we measured postnatal increases in the size of mature vallate taste buds and the vallate papilla, increases in the thickness of the gustatory epidermis, and increases in the number of mature taste buds and taste cells per bud. Mature taste buds, defined as those having a taste pore, are rare at birth but proliferate rapidly during the first postnatal month until an average of 610 mature taste buds has accumulated by 90 days. Throughout this postnatal period, mature taste buds adjust to the developmental thickening of the epidermis by continuously increasing in length. Mature taste buds also increase in width, in part due to a threefold increase from 10 and 45 days in the number of taste cells per bud. From 10 to 21 days there is an average daily net increase of three cells per mature taste bud. The maturational increase in taste buds and cells may contribute to the functional changes in taste nerve responses known to occur over the course of several generations of taste receptor cells. The dimensions of the vallate papilla and the surface area of the gustatory epithelium increase logarithmically with age. Although mature taste buds continue to increase in number until 90 days, both taste bud density (178/mm2) and the number of cells per mature taste bud (70-75 cells) reach ceilings by 45 days. Thus, density-dependent factors appear to control vallate taste bud maturation. The immaturity of lingual taste buds in newborn rats supports the view that odor, rather than taste, is the chemosensory signal that guides suckling in altricial rodents.

Animals↗

Distribution of vimentin in the developing chick taste bud during the perihatching period.

The tissue environment within which taste bud cells develop has not been wholly elaborated. Previous studies of taste bud development in vertebrates, including the avian chick, have suggested that taste bud cells could arise from one, or several tissue sources (e.g. crest-mesenchyme, local ectoderm or endoderm). Thus, molecular markers which are present in gemmal as well as interfacing (peribud epithelium; mesenchyme-epithelium) regions, and their degree of expression during stages of taste bud development, are of special interest. The intermediate filament protein, vimentin, occurs in mesenchymal and mesodermally-derived (e.g. endothelial, fibroblast) cells as well as highly proliferating epithelium (e.g. tumors). The present study in chick gustatory tissue utilized antibodies against vimentin and the avidin-biotin-peroxidase technique to evaluate vimentin immunoreactivity (IR) within a timeframe which includes: 1) early stages of the taste bud primordium [embryonic days (E)17-E18)]; 2) the beginning of an accelerated bud cell proliferation at the time of initial, taste bud pore opening [around E19]; 3) attaining the adult complement of taste buds [around posthatch (H) day 1], and 4) completed organogenesis (H 17). During this time span, vimentin-IR was characterized in a region including and sometimes bridging taste bud and subepithelial connective tissue, whereas non-gustatory surrounding epithelium and salivary glands were vimentin-immuno-negative. Intragemmally, the proportion of vimentin-IR cells as related to total taste bud cells peaked at E19. These results indicate that vimentin expression, in part, is related to the onset of taste bud cell proliferation and suggest that mesenchyme could be one source of taste bud cells. Secondly, fibronectin, an extracellular matrix component of the epithelial basement membrane interface with mesenchyme, was expressed at or near the apical surfaces of taste bud cells projecting into the bud lumen, and in the basal gemmal region suggesting the possible role of fibronectin as a chemotactic anchor for differentiating and migrating taste bud receptor cells. Lastly, neuron-specific enolase-IR indicates that axonal varicosities are already present intragemmally at E17-E18, that is, during the incipient period of identifiable taste bud primordia.

Animals↗

A genomic study of the bipolar bud site selection pattern in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

A genome-wide screen of 4168 homozygous diploid yeast deletion strains has been performed to identify nonessential genes that participate in the bipolar budding pattern. By examining bud scar patterns representing the sites of previous cell divisions, 127 mutants representing three different phenotypes were found: unipolar, axial-like, and random. From this screen, 11 functional classes of known genes were identified, including those involved in actin-cytoskeleton organization, general bud site selection, cell polarity, vesicular transport, cell wall synthesis, protein modification, transcription, nuclear function, translation, and other functions. Four characterized genes that were not known previously to participate in bud site selection were also found to be important for the haploid axial budding pattern. In addition to known genes, we found 22 novel genes (20 are designated BUD13-BUD32) important for bud site selection. Deletion of one resulted in unipolar budding exclusively from the proximal pole, suggesting that this gene plays an important role in diploid distal budding. Mutations in 20 other novel BUD genes produced a random budding phenotype and one produced an axial-like budding defect. Several of the novel Bud proteins were fused to green fluorescence protein; two proteins were found to localize to sites of polarized cell growth (i.e., the bud tip in small budded cells and the neck in cells undergoing cytokinesis), similar to that postulated for the bipolar signals and proteins that target cell division site tags to their proper location in the cell. Four others localized to the nucleus, suggesting that they play a role in gene expression. The bipolar distal marker Bud8 was localized in a number of mutants; many showed an altered Bud8-green fluorescence protein localization pattern. Through the genome-wide identification and analysis of different mutants involved in bipolar bud site selection, an integrated pathway for this process is presented in which proximal and distal bud site selection tags are synthesized and localized at their appropriate poles, thereby directing growth at those sites. Genome-wide screens of defined collections of mutants hold significant promise for dissecting many biological processes in yeast.

Actins↗

Winter bud content according to position in 3-year-old branching systems of 'Granny Smith' apple.

An investigation was made of the number of preformed organs in winter buds of 3-year-old reiterated complexes of the 'Granny Smith' cultivar. Winter bud content was studied with respect to bud position: terminal buds were compared on both long shoots and spurs according to branching order and shoot age, while axillary buds were compared between three zones (distal, median and proximal) along 1-year-old annual shoots in order 1. The percentage of winter buds that differentiated into inflorescences was determined and the flowers in each bud were counted for each bud category. The other organ categories considered were scales and leaf primordia. The results confirmed that a certain number of organs must be initiated before floral differentiation occurred. The minimum limit was estimated at about 15 organs on average, including scales. Total number of lateral organs formed was shown to vary with both bud position and meristem age, increasing from newly formed meristems to 1- and 2-year-old meristems on different shoot types. These differences in bud organogenesis depending on bud position, were consistent with the morphogenetic gradients observed in apple tree architecture. Axillary buds did not contain more than 15 organs on average and this low organogenetic activity of the meristems was related to a low number of flowers per bud. In contrast, the other bud categories contained more than 15 differentiated organs on average and a trade-off was observed between leaf and flower primordia. The ratio between the number of leaf and flower primordia per bud varied with shoot type. When the terminal buds on long shoots and spurs were compared, those on long shoots showed more flowers and a higher ratio of leaf to flower primordia.

Cell Differentiation↗

Expression of a ribosomal protein gene in axillary buds of pea seedlings.

Axillary buds of intact pea seedlings (Pisum sativum L. cv Alaska) do not grow and are said to be dormant. Decapitation of the terminal bud promotes the growth of these axillary buds, which then develop in the same manner as terminal buds. We previously showed that unique sets of proteins are expressed in dormant and growing buds. Here we describe the cloning, sequencing, and expression of a cDNA clone (pGB8) that is homologous to ribosomal protein L27 from rat. RNA corresponding to this clone increases 13-fold 3 h after decapitation, reaches a maximum enhancement of about 35-fold after 12 h, and persists at slightly reduced levels at later times. Terminal buds, root apices, and elongating internodes also contain pGB8 mRNA but fully expanded leaflets and fully elongated internodes do not. In situ hybridization analysis demonstrates that pGB8 mRNA increases in all parts of the bud within 1 h of decapitation. Under appropriate conditions, growing buds can be made to stop growing and become dormant; these buds subsequently can grow again. Therefore, buds have the capacity to undergo multiple cycles of growth and dormancy. RNA gel blots show that pGB8 expression is reduced to dormancy levels as soon as buds stop growing. However, in situ hybridization experiments show that pGB8 expression continues at growing-bud levels in the apical meristem for 2 d after it is reduced in the rest of the bud. When cultured stems containing buds are treated with indoleacetic acid at concentrations >/=10 mum, bud growth and expression of pGB8 in the buds are inhibited.

Journal Article↗

Discrete innervation of murine taste buds by peripheral taste neurons.

The peripheral taste system likely maintains a specific relationship between ganglion cells that signal a particular taste quality and taste bud cells responsive to that quality. We have explored a measure of the receptoneural relationship in the mouse. By injecting single fungiform taste buds with lipophilic retrograde neuroanatomical markers, the number of labeled geniculate ganglion cells innervating single buds on the tongue were identified. We found that three to five ganglion cells innervate a single bud. Injecting neighboring buds with different color markers showed that the buds are primarily innervated by separate populations of geniculate cells (i.e., multiply labeled ganglion cells are rare). In other words, each taste bud is innervated by a population of neurons that only connects with that bud. Palate bud injections revealed a similar, relatively exclusive receptoneural relationship. Injecting buds in different regions of the tongue did not reveal a topographic representation of buds in the geniculate ganglion, despite a stereotyped patterned arrangement of fungiform buds as rows and columns on the tongue. However, ganglion cells innervating the tongue and palate were differentially concentrated in lateral and rostral regions of the ganglion, respectively. The principal finding that small groups of ganglion cells send sensory fibers that converge selectively on a single bud is a new-found measure of specific matching between the two principal cellular elements of the mouse peripheral taste system. Repetition of the experiments in the hamster showed a more divergent innervation of buds in this species. The results indicate that whatever taste quality is signaled by a murine geniculate ganglion neuron, that signal reflects the activity of cells in a single taste bud.

Afferent Pathways↗

Neuron/target matching between chorda tympani neurons and taste buds during postnatal rat development.

During postnatal development, a relationship is established between the size of individual taste buds and number of innervating neurons. To determine whether rearrangement of neurons that innervate taste buds establishes this relationship, we labeled single taste buds at postnatal day 10 (P10) and again at either P15, P20, or P40 with retrograde fluorescent neuronal tracers. The number of single- and double-labeled geniculate ganglion cells was counted, and the respective taste bud volumes were measured for the three groups of rats. The current study replicates findings from an earlier report demonstrating that the larger the taste bud, the more geniculate ganglion cells that innervate it. This relationship between taste bud size and number of innervating neurons is not apparent until P40, when taste bud size reaches maturity. These findings are extended here by demonstrating that the number of neurons that innervate taste buds at P10, when taste bud size is small and relatively homogeneous, predicts the size that the respective taste bud will become at maturity. Moreover, while there is some neural rearrangement of taste bud innervation from P10 to P40, rearrangement does not impact the relationship between taste bud size and innervating neurons. That is, the neurons that maintain contact with taste buds from P10 through P40 accurately predict the mature taste bud size. Therefore, the size of the mature taste bud is determined by P10 and relates to the number of sensory neurons that innervate it at that age and the number of neurons that maintain contact with it throughout the first 40 days of postnatal development.

Age Factors↗

Interactions between the foot and bud patterning systems in Hydra vulgaris.

In the freshwater coelenterate, hydra, asexual reproduction via budding occurs at the base of the gastric region about two-thirds of the distance from the head to the foot. Developmental gradients of head and foot activation and inhibition originating from these organizing centers have long been assumed to control budding in hydra. Much has been learned over the years about these developmental gradients and axial pattern formation, and in particular, the inhibitory influence of the head on budding is well documented. However, understanding of the role of the foot and potential interactions between the foot, bud, and head patterning systems is lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of the foot in the initiation of new axis formation during budding by manipulating the foot and monitoring effects on the onset of first bud evagination and the time necessary to reach the 50% budding point. Several experimental situations were examined: the lower peduncle and foot (PF) were injured or removed, a second PF was laterally grafted onto animals either basally (below the budding zone) or apically (above the budding zone), or both the head and PF were removed simultaneously. When the PF was injured or removed, the onset of first bud evagination was delayed and/or the time until the 50% budding point was reached was longer. The effects were more pronounced when the manipulation was performed closer to the anticipated onset of budding. When PF tissue was doubled, precocious bud evagination was induced, regardless of graft location. Removal of the PF at the same time as decapitation reduced the inductive effect of decapitation on bud evagination. These results are discussed in light of potential signals from the foot or interactions between the foot and head patterning systems that might influence bud axis initiation.

Animal Structures↗

Assembly and budding of influenza virus.

Influenza viruses are causative agents of an acute febrile respiratory disease called influenza (commonly known as "flu") and belong to the Orthomyxoviridae family. These viruses possess segmented, negative stranded RNA genomes (vRNA) and are enveloped, usually spherical and bud from the plasma membrane (more specifically, the apical plasma membrane of polarized epithelial cells). Complete virus particles, therefore, are not found inside infected cells. Virus particles consist of three major subviral components, namely the viral envelope, matrix protein (M1), and core (viral ribonucleocapsid [vRNP]). The viral envelope surrounding the vRNP consists of a lipid bilayer containing spikes composed of viral glycoproteins (HA, NA, and M2) on the outer side and M1 on the inner side. Viral lipids, derived from the host plasma membrane, are selectively enriched in cholesterol and glycosphingolipids. M1 forms the bridge between the viral envelope and the core. The viral core consists of helical vRNP containing vRNA (minus strand) and NP along with minor amounts of NEP and polymerase complex (PA, PB1, and PB2). For viral morphogenesis to occur, all three viral components, namely the viral envelope (containing lipids and transmembrane proteins), M1, and the vRNP must be brought to the assembly site, i.e. the apical plasma membrane in polarized epithelial cells. Finally, buds must be formed at the assembly site and virus particles released with the closure of buds. Transmembrane viral proteins are transported to the assembly site on the plasma membrane via the exocytic pathway. Both HA and NA possess apical sorting signals and use lipid rafts for cell surface transport and apical sorting. These lipid rafts are enriched in cholesterol, glycosphingolipids and are relatively resistant to neutral detergent extraction at low temperature. M1 is synthesized on free cytosolic polyribosomes. vRNPs are made inside the host nucleus and are exported into the cytoplasm through the nuclear pore with the help of M1 and NEP. How M1 and vRNPs are directed to the assembly site on the plasma membrane remains unclear. The likely possibilities are that they use a piggy-back mechanism on viral glycoproteins or cytoskeletal elements. Alternatively, they may possess apical determinants or diffuse to the assembly site, or a combination of these pathways. Interactions of M1 with M1, M1 with vRNP, and M1 with HA and NA facilitate concentration of viral components and exclusion of host proteins from the budding site. M1 interacts with the cytoplasmic tail (CT) and transmembrane domain (TMD) of glycoproteins, and thereby functions as a bridge between the viral envelope and vRNP. Lipid rafts function as microdomains for concentrating viral glycoproteins and may serve as a platform for virus budding. Virus bud formation requires membrane bending at the budding site. A combination of factors including concentration of and interaction among viral components, increased viscosity and asymmetry of the lipid bilayer of the lipid raft as well as pulling and pushing forces of viral and host components are likely to cause outward curvature of the plasma membrane at the assembly site leading to bud formation. Eventually, virus release requires completion of the bud due to fusion of the apposing membranes, leading to the closure of the bud, separation of the virus particle from the host plasma membrane and release of the virus particle into the extracellular environment. Among the viral components, M1 contains an L domain motif and plays a critical role in budding. Bud completion requires not only viral components but also host components. However, how host components facilitate bud completion remains unclear. In addition to bud completion, influenza virus requires NA to release virus particles from sialic acid residues on the cell surface and spread from cell to cell. Elucidation of both viral and host factors involved in viral morphogenesis and budding may lead to the development of drugs interfering with the steps of viral morphogenesis and in disease progression.

Animals↗

Effects of elevated CO(2), nutrition and climatic warming on bud phenology in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) and their impact on the risk of frost damage.

Effects of elevated CO(2), clone and plant nutrition on bud dormancy of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) were examined. Sitka spruce seedlings were fumigated with ambient or elevated (ambient + 350 micro mol mol(-1)) concentrations of CO(2) in open-top chambers for three growing seasons. In 1991 and 1992, elevated CO(2) delayed bud burst in the spring and advanced bud set in the autumn. The effect of the open-top chamber on the thermal requirement for bud burst was greater than the effect of elevated CO(2) (50 and 30 day degrees (D(d)), respectively). In a second study, four clones of Sitka spruce taken from two provenances, at 43 and 54 degrees N, were fumigated with ambient or elevated CO(2). There was a large natural variation in the timing of bud burst and bud set among the clones. Elevated CO(2) had no effect on bud dormancy of the Skidegate a clone, but it reduced the growing season of the North Bend b clone by 20 days. In a third study, Sitka spruce seedlings growing in ambient or elevated CO(2), were supplied with one of three nutrient regimes, low (0.1 x potential), medium (0.5 x potential) or high (2.0 x potential), using a method and solution based on the Ingestad technique. Elevated CO(2) did not affect bud dormancy in the high-nutrient treatment, but it reduced the growing season of plants in the low-nutrient treatment by 22 days. Increasing plant nutrient supply lengthened the growing season, plants flushed earlier in the spring and set bud later in the autumn. The effects of elevated CO(2) plus a 0, 2 or 4 degrees C climatic warming on the timing of bud burst and the subsequent risk of frost damage were assessed using a simulation model and meteorological data from three sites, Edinburgh, Braemar and Masset. The model predicted that (i) doubling the CO(2) concentration in the absence of climatic warming, will delay the onset of bud burst at all three sites, (ii) climatic warming in ambient CO(2) will hasten bud burst and (iii) climatic warming in elevated CO(2) will hasten bud burst at Edinburgh and Braemar but to a lesser extent than climatic warming alone. At Masset, a 4 degrees C warming was required to advance the date of bud burst of seedlings in the elevated CO(2) treatment. At all three sites, elevated CO(2) and climatic warming increased the mean daily temperature on the date of bud burst, thus reducing the risk of subsequent frost damage.

Journal Article↗

Distinct expression pattern of insulin-like growth factor family in rodent taste buds.

The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) system is an important regulator of growth and differentiation in a variety of tissues. In the present study, the expression of IGF family members in the taste buds of mice and rats was examined. By reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis, mRNA of IGF-I and -II, IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR), insulin receptor (insulin R), and IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-2, -3, -4, -5, and -6 was detected in the taste bud-containing epithelium of the circumvallate papillae of mice. As suggested by the study using degenerate PCR (McLaughlin [2000] J. Neurosci. 20:5679-5688), IGF-IR was expressed in most of the taste bud cells of adult mice, as found by immunohistochemistry, and in those of postnatal day (P) 6 mice by in situ hybridization. Insulin R, which has strong homology to IGF-IR, was also detected in most of the taste bud cells of mice by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. IGF-I immunoreactivity was detected in a few taste bud cells and in the epithelium surrounding taste buds. Northern blot analysis revealed that the amount of IGF-I mRNA in taste bud-containing epithelium was very low compared with that in liver. IGF-II immunoreactivity was weakly detected in mouse taste buds and the surrounding epithelium. In the rat tissue, a subset of the taste bud cells was positive for IGF-II. Among the six IGFBPs, IGFBP-2, -5, and -6 were detected in the mouse taste buds: IGFBP-2 and -5 immunoreactivity was seen in the majority of the taste bud cells, whereas IGFBP-6 immunoreactivity was found in the nerve fibers innervating the taste buds. In situ hybridization study also revealed that IGFBP-2 and -5 mRNA was synthesized in the taste buds of P6 mice and that the expression of these mRNAs overlapped in von Ebner's glands. These data reveal that IGF-I and -II might be produced in taste bud cells and (or) surrounding lingual epithelium and act through IGF-IR and insulin R locally in a paracrine and autocrine manner. The activity of these IGFs may be modulated through their interaction with IGFBP-2, -5, and 6.

Age Factors↗

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor-, neurotrophin-3-, and tyrosine kinase receptor-like immunoreactivity in lingual taste bud fields of mature hamster after sensory denervation.

Unlike lingual taste buds in most mammals, fungiform buds on the anterior tongue of mature hamster survive sensory denervation. The role of the neurotrophin ligands, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and neurotrophin-3 (NT-3), and their respective tyrosine kinase (Trk) receptors, TrkB and TrkC, in denervated taste buds is not known. The present report investigates changes in the degree of gemmal cell immunoreactivity (IR) (i.e., number of immunoreactive cells/bud profile) and density of nerve fiber-IR of these markers in unilaterally denervated mature hamsters. The fungiform bud field after chorda tympani/lingual nerve resection is compared with the nerve-dependent, posterior tongue foliate and circumvallate bud fields after glossopharyngeal nerve resection. Four weeks post lesion, the number of denervated fungiform buds matched that on the unoperated side, whereas denervated foliate and circumvallate bud counts decreased by 72% and 38%, respectively. In taste buds that survived on the posterior tongue, the degree of foliate bud cell BDNF-, NT-3-, and TrkB-like IR, and circumvallate bud cell BDNF- and NT-3-like IR, significantly decreased compared with the unoperated side. In contrast, for anterior tongue fungiform bud cells, the degree of neurotrophin- and receptor-like IR was relatively less affected: NT-3- and TrkB-like IR were unchanged; BDNF-like IR, although significantly decreased, was also maintained. Moreover, TrkB-like fiber IR was essentially eliminated within and surrounding fungiform buds. Hence, NT-3-, BDNF-, and TrkB-like IR in fungiform gemmal cells may reflect an autocrine capacity promoting survival. Because TrkC-like IR in bud cells is absent (i.e., immunonegative), and sparse in fibers intragemmally and perigemmally, NT-3 may also bind to bud cell TrkB so as to sustain fungiform gemmal cell viability post denervation.

Animals↗

Application of serial sectioning and three-dimensional reconstruction to the study of taste bud ultrastructure and organization.

The lingual taste buds of mammals are complex organs containing dozens of cells of varying morphology and numerous nerve fibers that are intermingled among the cellular processes. Some of the taste bud cells form synaptic contacts with these nerve fibers. Important questions remain to be answered regarding the structure and function of the cells of various types within taste buds and the means by which responses to gustatory stimuli are transmitted to the nerve fibers that communicate with the brain. Using both conventional and high voltage electron microscopy, we have examined serially sectioned taste buds from the tongues of mice and rabbits in order to address these issues and to obtain more complete information than that available from sampling of sections. The technique of computer-assisted 3-D reconstruction was used to generate models of whole taste buds and individual cellular and neural elements within taste buds from the serial sections. Analysis of serially sectioned taste buds from mice and rabbits has revealed that in both of these species relatively few (30% or less) of the cells within the taste buds form synaptic contacts with nerve fibers. In the foliate taste buds of rabbits, all of the cells that are presynaptic to nerve fibers are of a single morphological type (type III). The cells that are presynaptic to nerve fibers within the taste buds of mice are morphologically diverse. A pattern of synaptic connectivity exists within murine taste buds such that a given nerve fiber receives synaptic input only from taste cells that are ultrastructurally similar. In the taste buds of both mice and rabbits, we have observed both divergence and convergence of synaptic input from the putative taste receptor cells onto nerve fibers, suggesting that at the level of the taste bud there is some integration of the information generated by individual receptor cells. In addition to typical chemical synapses, other cytoplasmic specializations (such as subsurface cisternae and atypical mitochondria) may be involved in interactions between taste bud cells and nerve fibers.

Animals↗

Retinoid-induced limb defects 2: involvement of TGF-beta 2 in retinoid-induced inhibition of limb bud development.

We previously demonstrated that retinoid-induced inhibition of chondrogenesis in the forelimb bud may be mediated by TGF-beta2 (1). The present study was conducted to examine whether TGF-beta2 is involved in the inhibition of forelimb bud development caused by all-trans-retinoic acid (RA). Expression of TGF-beta2 was examined immunohistochemically in forelimb buds of embryos 24 h after dosing to the mother on Day 12 of gestation in the rat. In the control and 50 mg/kg group, TGF-beta2 was expressed in the epithelium and prechondrogenic area around dead cells in the forelimb bud. In the 100 mg/kg group, a dose at which RA caused reduction defects of forearm bones, TGF-beta2 expression was observed in the distal margin of forelimb buds, in which no expression was observed in the control and 50 mg/kg group. Immunohistologic studies also indicated that in the 100 mg/kg group, the expression of TGF-beta2 was enhanced in forearm-bone prechondrocytes around the dead cells. In a whole embryo culture system, exposure to RA for 24 h reduced the proximodistal length and protein content in forelimb buds at concentrations of 3 microg/mL or more. The whole embryo culture system also showed that the expression of TGF-beta2 was induced at the concentration of 3 microg/mL in the same region as found in forelimb buds of embryos from dams administered a teratogenic dosage of RA in vivo. Local application of TGF-beta2 to the distal margin of the forelimb bud in Day 12 embryos reduced proximodistal growth and protein content in forelimb buds for 24 h in culture even without RA treatment. We also found that exogenous TGF-beta2 inhibited DNA synthesis of forelimb bud cells in culture in a concentration-dependent manner. Neutralization of TGF-beta2 with its antibody in the distal margin of forelimb buds partially prevented the RA-induced inhibition of forelimb bud growth in the whole embryo culture system. These results suggest that RA-induced TGF-beta2 in the distal margin of forelimb buds may be involved in RA-induced inhibition of forelimb bud growth via reduction of cell proliferation in the distal margin, and RA-induced TGF-beta2 in the prechondrogenic area may inhibit chondrogenesis in the future forearm bones, followed by reduction defects of the forearm bones.

Animals↗

Heterogeneity of fish taste bud ultrastructure as demonstrated in the holosteans Amia calva and Lepisosteus oculatus.

Taste buds are the peripheral sensory organs of the gustatory system. They occur in all taxa of vertebrates and are pear-shaped intra-epithelial organs of about 80 microm height and 50 microm width. Taste buds mainly consist of specialized epithelial cells, which synapse at their bases and therefore are secondary sensory cells. Taste buds have been described based on studies of teleostean species, but it turned out that the ultrastructure of teleostean taste buds may differ between distinct systematic groups and that this description is not representative of those taste buds in other main taxa of fishes, such as selachians, holosteans and dipnoans. Furthermore, it is not known how variable the micromorphologies of non-teleostean taste buds are. For this reason the taste buds of two holosteans, Lepisosteus oculatus and Amia calva, were investigated and compared. While in both species the taste buds are of the same shapes and sizes, the cellular components of their sensory epithelia differ: in Lepisosteus taste buds comprise two types of elongated light cells and one type of dark cells. In contrast, Amia taste buds contain only one type of light, but two types of dark elongated cells. Afferent synapses are common in the buds of both species, efferent synapses occur only in Lepisosteus taste buds. These differences show that even in the small group of holostean fishes the taste buds are differently organized. Consequently, a representative type of fish taste buds does not exist.

Animals↗

Qualitative and quantitative differences between taste buds of the rat and mouse.

BACKGROUND: Numerous electrophysiological, ultrastructural, and immunocytochemical studies on rodent taste buds have been carried out on rat taste buds. In recent years, however, the mouse has become the species of choice for molecular and other studies on sensory transduction in taste buds. Do rat and mouse taste buds have the same cell types, sensory transduction markers and synaptic proteins? In the present study we have used antisera directed against PLCbeta2, alpha-gustducin, serotonin (5-HT), PGP 9.5 and synaptobrevin-2 to determine the percentages of taste cells expressing these markers in taste buds in both rodent species. We also determined the numbers of taste cells in the taste buds as well as taste bud volume. RESULTS: There are significant differences (p < 0.05) between mouse and rat taste buds in the percentages of taste cells displaying immunoreactivity for all five markers. Rat taste buds display significantly more immunoreactivity than mice for PLCbeta2 (31.8% vs 19.6%), alpha-gustducin (18% vs 14.6%), and synaptobrevin-2 (31.2% vs 26.3%). Mice, however, have more cells that display immunoreactivity to 5-HT (15.9% vs 13.7%) and PGP 9.5 (14.3% vs 9.4%). Mouse taste buds contain an average of 85.8 taste cells vs 68.4 taste cells in rat taste buds. The average volume of a mouse taste bud (42,000 microm3) is smaller than a rat taste bud (64,200 microm3). The numerical density of taste cells in mouse circumvallate taste buds (2.1 cells/1000 microm3) is significantly higher than that in the rat (1.2 cells/1000 microm3). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that rats and mice differ significantly in the percentages of taste cells expressing signaling molecules. We speculate that these observed dissimilarities may reflect differences in their gustatory processing.

Animals↗