PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Anesthesia, Inhalation”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 901 records · Page 50Linked to original sources

A randomized double-blinded comparison of metoclopramide, ondansetron and cyclizine in day-case laparoscopy.

This study determined the overall incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in 38 patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological procedures who received a standardized propofol/isoflurane anaesthetic but no preoperative antiemetic. A further 166 patients similarly anaesthetized were then randomly allocated to receive either metoclopramide 10 mg. ondansetron 4 mg, or cyclizine 50 mg as an intravenous antiemetic immediately preinduction. Overall incidence of PONV was determined for all groups and the relative efficacy of the three antiemetic agents assessed. Fifty per cent of patients in the initial group (no antiemetic) reported significant nausea and/or vomiting up to 24 hours postoperatively. The incidence of PONV in the metoclopramide group was 24%, in the ondansetron group 20%, and in the cyclizine group 51%. There was no detectable difference in relative efficacy between ondansetron 4 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg. The incidence of PONV in the group who received cyclizine was similar to that found in the pilot group who received no PONV prophylaxis. Both metoclopramide and ondansetron may potentially decrease the incidence of PONV following gynaecologic laparoscopy by up to 50% when administered intravenously prior to a propofol/isoflurane anaesthetic.

Adult↗

Recovery from mivacurium block with or without anticholinesterase following continuous infusion in obstetric patients.

Neostigmine antagonism after suxamethonium followed by mivacurium chloride bolus and infusion was studied. Thirty ASA group I or II patients were given mivacurium 0.15 mg/kg followed by infusion during nitrous oxide-enflurane-pethidine anaesthesia. Train of four (TOF) stimuli were applied to the ulnar nerve at the wrist and TOF twitch height and ratio measured by TOF-GUARD nerve stimulator. Mivacurium infusion was titrated to give a 90% block of first twitch height. Patients were randomized into two groups. Group I patients recovered from the mivacurium block spontaneously while Group II patients were given neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg and atropine 0.02 mg/kg. Time to reach train of four ratio (TOFR) of 25%, 50% and 70% were measured. This study demonstrated a mean infusion rate of 5.1 +/- 1.8 micrograms/kg/min to maintain a 90% neuromuscular block. In the spontaneous recovery group, time to reach TOFR of 25%, 50% and 70% were 9.3 +/- 2.7 min, 13.5 +/- 3.0 min and 16.7 +/- 3.0 min respectively while the corresponding times in the neostigmine group were 5.2 +/- 1.7 min, 10.9 +/- 2.2 min and 16.1 +/- 7.4 min respectively. There were significant differences in the time taken to TOFR of 25% (P < 0.0001) and 50% (P < 0.05) but no difference in the time taken for TOFR to return to 70%. We concluded that mivacurium is suitable for use in caesarean section despite a decrease in plasma cholinesterase activity. Neostigmine antagonism is not required as a routine.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗

The effect of caudal analgesia on emergence agitation in children after sevoflurane versus halothane anesthesia.

UNLABELLED: Sevoflurane anesthesia in young children has been associated with an increased incidence of emergence agitation compared with halothane. Postoperative pain may be an etiologic factor. We designed a study to compare the incidence of emergence agitation after halothane and sevoflurane anesthesia in children whose pain was managed with caudal analgesia. Eighty children undergoing inguinal hernia repair between the ages of 12 mo and 6 yr were randomly assigned to receive either halothane or sevoflurane anesthesia. Baseline preoperative anxiety was assessed with the Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale. The children were sedated with oral midazolam, underwent a mask induction, and had a caudal block placed for postoperative analgesia. After surgery, the children's behavior was assessed with a four-point agitation scale. At 5 min after arrival in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), sevoflurane was associated with a greater incidence of emergence agitation than halothane (26% vs 6%; P < 0.05), but not during the remainder of the PACU stay. Higher levels of preoperative anxiety were associated with difficult mask induction, agitation on admission to the PACU, and more severe agitation episodes. Emergence agitation appears to be an early and transient phenomenon after sevoflurane anesthesia in children with effective postoperative analgesia. IMPLICATIONS: Effective postoperative analgesia may reduce the incidence of emergence agitation reported with sevoflurane anesthesia. The Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale appears to be helpful in identifying young children who are at risk for developing emergence agitation.

Analgesia↗

Recovery after anesthesia for short pediatric oncology procedures: propofol and remifentanil compared with propofol, nitrous oxide, and sevoflurane.

Anesthesia techniques in children undergoing short painful oncology procedures should allow rapid recovery without side effects. We compared the recovery characteristics of two anesthetic techniques: propofol with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide and a total IV technique using propofol and remifentanil. Twenty-one children, undergoing two similar painful procedures within 2 wk were studied in a single-blind manner within patient comparison. The order of the techniques was randomized. Propofol and remifentanil involved bolus doses of both propofol 3-5 mg/kg and remifentanil 1-4 microg/kg. Propofol with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide involved propofol 3-5 mg/kg with 2%-8% sevoflurane and 70% nitrous oxide. The primary outcome variable was the time taken to achieve recovery discharge criteria; other recovery characteristics were also noted. The mean age of the children was 6.5 yr (range, 2.5-9.8 yr). Nineteen had lymphoblastic leukemia and two had lymphoma. All children had intrathecal chemotherapy and one had bone marrow aspiration. Most procedures lasted <4 min. The mean time to achieve recovery discharge criteria was appreciably shorter after propofol and remifentanil than propofol with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide by nearly 19 min (P = 0.001). All other time comparisons had similar trends and statistical differences. Seven parents expressed a preference for the propofol and remifentanil technique compared with one preferring propofol with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide. Children are apneic during the procedure and require respiratory support from an anesthesiologist. Discharge readiness from the recovery ward was achieved on average 19 min earlier after propofol with remifentanil compared with the combination of propofol, sevoflurane and nitrous oxide. Parents more often preferred propofol with remifentanil.

Anesthesia Recovery Period↗

Total intravenous anesthesia versus single breath technique and anesthesia maintenance with sevoflurane for bariatric operations.

BACKGROUND: The choice of anesthetic technique for general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients remains controversial. We aimed to compare blood gases, recovery and hemodynamic parameters using TIVA and sevoflurane anesthesia in bariatric surgery. METHODS: The study was performed with permission of the ethics committee. We studied 40 morbidly obese patients allocated to 2 groups. The total i.v. anesthesia (TIVA) group was named Group T, and the sevoflurane group was named Group S. In Group T, anesthesia induction was achieved with propofol. In Group S, anesthesia induction was achieved by sevoflurane with single breath technique, with maintenance provided with 1-2% volume sevoflurane. Student t, Chi square and ANOVA tests were used for data analysis; p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in demographic data, blood gas values and recovery characteristic. Hemodynamic values were significantly lower in Group T than Group S, during and after the operative period. CONCLUSION: While sevoflurane induction and maintenance is a suitable anesthetic modality for obese patients, TIVA can be applied easily in those patients possessing no extra risk factors other than morbid obesity.

Adult↗

[Depressive effects of propofol on apoptotic injury and delayed neuronal death after forebrain ischemia in the rat--comparison with nitrous oxide-oxygen-isoflurane].

We investigated the brain protection effects of propofol anesthesia and nitrous oxide-oxygen-isoflurane anesthesia (GOI) using forebrain ischemic model of male Sprague-Dawley rats. Propofol group (P, n = 15) was anesthetized with propofol, oxygen and nitrogen (FIO2 = 0.33), and isoflurane group (GOI, n = 15) with 66% nitrous oxide, 33% oxygen and 1.2% isoflurane under mechanical ventilation. The anesthesia was deepened until electroencephalographic burst suppression appeared in each group. The bilateral common carotid arteries were, then, occluded for 10 minutes while the blood pressure was maintained at about 40 mmHg by venesection. The venesected blood was returned at the end of ischemic period. The animals were kept and fed in cage after emergence. On the day 2, 4, and 7, five animals of each group were sacrificed and the microscopic samples were obtained. The CA-1 cells of hippocampus were then stained with hematoxylin and eosin for the delayed neuronal death (DND) and with TUNEL method for the apoptosis. Propofol reduced the apoptosis, i.e., reduced the TUNEL positive cell count (GOI = 121.2 +/- 25.2.mm-1; P = 53.8 +/- 11.4.mm-1; P < 0.01; mean +/- SD) on the day 2 after ischemia, and also reduced the delayed neuronal death (alive CA-1 cell count; GOI = 18.1 +/- 8.9.mm-1; P = 33.1 +/- 12.8.mm-1; P < 0.01) on the day 7 after ischemia. It is important to determine the recovery interval after brain ischemia in detection of DND and apoptosis. We conclude that propofol inhibits neuronal apoptosis after brain ischemia and consequently reduces the delayed neuronal death in the CA-1 pyramidal cell layer of the hippocampus.

Anesthesia, Inhalation↗

[Comparison of an auditory evoked potentials index and a bispectral index versus clinical signs for determining the depth of anesthesia produced by propofol or sevoflurane].

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate an anesthetic depth index (ADI) obtained from auditory evoked potentials and a bispectral EEG index (BIS) in comparison with clinical assessment of anesthetic depth using the modified observer's assessment of awareness/sedation scale (MOAA/SS), for induction of anesthesia with propofol or sevoflurane as the only agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The ADI and BIS were recorded simultaneously in this prospective study and compared to the MOAA/SS during the anesthetic induction of 26 adults undergoing elective heart surgery. Assignment of patients to two groups was random. Group A (n = 13) patients were induced with propofol (target dose 5 micrograms.ml-1 in 5 min). Induction in group B (n = 13) was with sevoflurane (8% tidal volume). A scheme of awake-sleeping-awake-sleeping was followed. The means of the two indexes were compared (Mann-Whitney test) one minute before the patient slept (awake) and one minute later (sleeping), and the evolution of the indexes was compared during awake/sleep and sleep/awake phase changes and while the patients were in a stable sleep phase. The sensitivity and specificity of each index was analyzed in function of the MOAA/SS. We also analyzed the time elapsing from the moment the patient fell asleep (MOAA/SS 2) until the two indexes reached published reference values (ADI = 38, BIS = 60). RESULTS: After induction with propofol (group A) the ADI fell to 29.2 +/- 11.7 and the BIS fell to 63.5 +/- 13.4. After induction with sevoflurane (group B) the ADI fell to 33.8 +/- 14.9 and the BIS to 66.8 +/- 15. The ADI value that best discriminated between arousal and sleeping (sensitivity 100%) was 38; the BIS value that best discriminated was 60. The responses to sound in decibels (dB) during "awake/sleeping" and "sleeping/awake" phases were, respectively, -3.8 dB and -4.5 dB for the ADI and -1.5 dB and -0.8 dB for the BIS. With the patient in stable sleep, response to the two indexes was at -0.79 dB. In group A, the ADI detected MOAA/SS 2 significantly earlier (ADI 13.1 +/- 30 s; BIS 56 +/- 36 s; p < 0.05). No patient reported remembering the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring anesthetic depth with the ADI or BIS was technically easy and effective for detecting whether patients were awake or sleeping. The ADI response was faster and identified awake/sleeping and sleeping/awake phase changes better than did the BIS.

Adult↗

Liver and renal function after volatile induction and maintenance of anesthesia (VIMA) with sevoflurane versus TIVA with sufentanil-midazolam for CABG surgery.

We compared liver and renal function after volatile induction and maintenance of anesthesia (VIMA) with sevoflurane and minimal dose sufentanil versus total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with moderate dose of midazolam and sufentanil in patients undergoing CABG surgery. Eighty nine patients were studied retrospectively after VIMA (44 patients) or after TIVA (45 patients). Liver and renal function were measured before (T0), then 1 (T1), 2 (T2), 5 (T3) days and 6 weeks (T4) after the operation. Serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) increased in both groups at T1, T2 and T3 and the highest levels were at T1. Levels of total bilirubin (TBil) increased at T1 only in the TIVA group. Levels of g-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), increased in both groups at T3. Serum levels of creatinine (Cr) were high in both groups on T1 and T2. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) was high in both group at T2, and T3 with the peak levels in T2. Six weeks after the operation all liver and renal functions were normal in both groups. We concluded that VIMA with sevoflurane during cardiac surgery has no untoward effects on liver or renal functions. The transient reversible elevation was comparable in the VIMA and TIVA groups which was most probably due to the effect of the operation itself.

Aged↗

[Remifentanil in heart surgery].

The contributions of remifentanil to anesthesia for heart surgery is described. The pharmacokinetic properties are described along with our clinical experience with the various modes and doses of perfusion for induction as well as during and after surgery.

Analgesics↗

[Comparison of sevoflurane/nitrous oxide and thiopental/fentanyl in anesthesia for minor gynecologic surgery].

We studied 40 patients undergoing minor gynaecological surgery, anaesthetized in random order with sevoflurane-nitrous oxide or thiopental-fentanyl. Operating conditions, pain, recovery and postoperative nausea and vomiting were assessed. For postoperative analgesia, all patients were given dypiron 1 g intravenous at the end of anaesthesia. Patients and gynaecologists were equally satisfied with both anaesthetic techniques. The time of surgery were higher in patients given sevoflurane, (7 versus 5 minutes) this women had recovery faster (17 versus 72 minutes) became orientated, followed orders (11 versus 19 minutes) and were able to walk (17 versus 60 minutes) significantly (p < 0.05) earlier than those given thiopental. Modified Aldrete scores were also higher in sevoflurane group within the first hour after anaesthesia, there were no differences in woke up (9 versus 12 minutes) vital constants, intrauterine bleeding, pain, and frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting (10% versus 10%) between the two groups. We conclude that sevofluranenitrous-oxide is preferable to thiopental-fentanyl in ultra-short anaesthesia for minor gynaecological surgery.

Adult↗

Minimal low-flow isoflurane-based anesthesia benefits patients undergoing coronary revascularization via preventing hyperglycemia and maintaining metabolic homeostasis.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to determine whether minimal low-flow isoflurane-based anesthesia could be a feasible technique for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. It is hypothesized that isoflurane-based anesthesia facilitates an agreeable recovery from surgery is mediated through preventing hyperglycemia and metabolic disturbance associated with cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: 107 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to two groups, i.e., isoflurane-based anesthesia group (n = 54) and fentanyl-based anesthesia group (control group, n = 53). In isoflurane-based anesthesia group, patients received isoflurane from induction up till departure from operating room to intensive care unit (ICU). In the control group, fentanyl (66.4 +/- 3.2 micrograms/kg) and midazolam (320 +/- 20 micrograms/kg) were administered to anesthetize the patients during the operation. RESULTS: Patients with isoflurane-based anesthesia required less dopamine (0.6 +/- 0.2 vs. 4.2 +/- 0.4 micrograms/min) and dobutamine (0.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 4.1 +/- 0.5 micrograms/min); they could be extubated earlier (7.9 +/- 1.0 vs. 35.1 +/- 2.9 h), and had a shorter stay at ICU (2.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 4.8 +/- 0.4 days). In addition, occurrence of hyperglycemia (167 +/- 7.7 vs. 243 +/- 9.5 mg/dl) and bicarbonate requirement (128 +/- 7.0 vs. 313 +/- 22.0 mEq) were less in patients with isoflurane-based anesthesia as compared with those in fentanyl group. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that isoflurane, not fentanyl, benefits patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. This benefit perhaps is mediated through maintaining hemodynamic stability and metabolic homeostasis and preventing hyperglycemia.

Aged↗

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a case report.

It is easy to take for granted the seemingly effortless way cardiovascular surgeons are able to bypass atherosclerotic coronary arteries. The process used today was developed over many years of rigorous study, experimentation, success, and failure. Early cardiac surgery was performed blindly, through small incisions, on a beating heart. Advances in medicine allowed surgery to be performed on hearts stilled by cardioplegic arrest, while the circulation was continued through the use of a cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) machine. The development of the CPB machine allowed surgeons to perform the delicate work of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), first attempted on dogs, and then humans. This article briefly outlines the historical evolution of cardiac surgery that led to the development of the technology necessary to perform off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). A case report of a 72-year-old female who underwent OPCAB is outlined. Included is a discussion of some of the benefits and potential complications of CABG and OPCAB. Anesthetic considerations for OPCAB procedures also are presented.

Aged↗

General anesthetic effects on compound muscle action potentials elicited by single or dual spinal cord stimulation.

The aim of this study was to determine the optimal conditions, during general anesthesia, to obtain reproducible monitoring of compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) as a means to evaluate motor tract integrity. The CMAPs were recorded in the soleus muscle of cats and were elicited by either single or double pulse stimulations (with various amplitudes and interpulse durations) of the spinal cord via an epidural electrode. The effects of various depths of general anesthesia with halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, or propofol on such recordings were also determined. For each agent, the CMAP amplitudes were significantly greater following double pulse stimulations (2-ms optimal interpulse duration) relative to single pulses. The CMAP amplitudes elicited by double pulse stimulations were the same at propofol concentrations of 50, 100, 150, and 200 micrograms/kg/min, whereas those for each volatile anesthetic, at all concentrations studied (0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, or 2.0%), were significantly lower. It was concluded that to obtain reliable CMAP amplitudes, general anesthesia with propofol should be employed and the potentials should be evoked by double pulse stimulations.

Action Potentials↗