SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 901 records · Page 50Linked to original sources

PubMed2006

Stampidine as a novel nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibit with potent anti-HIV activity.

Stavudine (STV, d4T, 2',3'-didehydro-3'-deoxythymidine, CAS 3056-17-5) is a standard anti-HIV drug. Stampidine (STAMP, DDE-113, HI-113, N-[p-(4-bromophenyl)-2',3'-didehydro-3'-deoxy-5'-thymidylyl]-L-alanine methyl ester, CAS 217178-62-6) is a novel aryl phosphate derivative of stavudine with more potent anti-HIV activity and more favorable pharmacodynamic features. The remarkable potency of stampidine against clinical HIV-1 isolates with NRTI- or NNRTI-resistance (NRTI, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor) warrants the further development of this new anti-HIV agent.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

PubMed1999

Pharmacokinetics and potential interactions amongst antiretroviral agents used to treat patients with HIV infection.

There are 3 groups of drugs available for the treatment of patients with HIV disease. These are the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors ('nucleoside analogues') [zidovudine, didanosine, zalcitabine, lamivudine and abacavir]; the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (nevirapine, delavirdine and efavirenz); and the protease inhibitors (saquinavir, ritonavir, indinavir, nelfinavir and amprenavir). The preferred initial regimen should reduce and maintain plasma HIV RNA below the level of detection. Presently, the regimen of choice consists of 2 nucleoside analogues plus a protease inhibitor with high in vivo efficacy. An alternative combination consists of 2 nucleoside analogues plus a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Drug interactions are one of the major problems associated with these multidrug regimens. Changes in plasma concentrations of the nucleoside analogues are unlikely to be of clinical relevance as drug effect is mainly dependent on the rate and extent of intracellular phosphorylation. Combinations of zidovudine plus stavudine, and probably zalcitabine plus lamivudine, should be avoided as competition for phosphorylating enzymes may occur. The antiviral efficacy of some nucleoside analogues, e.g. stavudine, may be compromised by prior treatment with other nucleosides (e.g. zidovudine). However, these data need to be clarified in further studies. It is unlikely that administration of other antiretrovirals will influence the activity of nucleoside analogues. Protease inhibitors are metabolised by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Combination protease inhibitor therapy can result in drug interactions mediated by enzyme inhibition. Ritonavir is the most potent inhibitor, saquinavir the least. The protease inhibitors also interact with the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Nevirapine and efavirenz induce drug metabolising enzymes and may reduce plasma concentrations of protease inhibitors. A study in healthy volunteers showed that nelfinavir concentrations are increased by combination with efavirenz. Delavirdine inhibits drug metabolising enzymes and increases the plasma concentration of coadministered protease inhibitors. The nucleoside analogues would not be expected to interact with the protease inhibitors. Apart from the ability of didanosine to reduce the area under the concentration-time curve of delavirdine, there are no reports of clinically significant interactions of other antiretrovirals with the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Triple therapy is the current standard of care for patients with HIV disease. However, studies of quadruple therapy are already under way. Drug interactions are likely to remain one of the major considerations when selecting a therapeutic regimen for patients with HIV.

Antiviral Agents↗

PubMed2006

Predictors of antiretroviral-related hepatotoxicity in the adult AIDS Clinical Trial Group (1989-1999).

HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART)-related hepatotoxicity is a significant clinical problem, resulting in severe elevations of liver enzymes and, potentially, liver failure and death. We retrospectively determined baseline clinical predictors of severe hepatotoxicity (SH; serum aminotransferases or total bilirubin >5 times and >2.5 times the upper limit of normal [ULN], respectively) among 8,851 subjects enrolled in 16 Adult AIDS Clinical Trial Group studies from October 1989 to June 1999. Subjects were divided into the following treatment categories: single nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), multiple NRTIs, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) combined with NRTIs, and the protease inhibitor (PI) indinavir (IDV) combined with NRTIs. SH occurred in 824 (9.3%) subjects, in 613 (6.92%) in the first 6 months and in another 211(2.38%) in the subsequent 6 months of study ART. Consistent with other reports, baseline elevation in serum aminotransferases was a significant risk factor for SH for all regimens. Risk factors not previously identified included concomitant hepatotoxic medications, thrombocytopenia, and renal insufficiency. Hepatitis C virus coinfection was associated with an increased risk of SH (odds ratio [OR] = 2.7; P < 0.003). In conclusion, this study identified known and previously unreported risk factors for severe hepatotoxicity that should be considered before the initiation of ART.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

PubMed1992

HIV inhibitors targeted at the reverse transcriptase.

HIV inhibitors targeted at the virus-associated reverse transcriptase (RT) can be divided into two groups, depending on whether they are targeted at the substrate or nonsubstrate binding site. To the first group belong the 2',3'-dideoxynucleosides (i.e., DDC, DDI), 3'-azido-2',3'-dideoxynucleosides (i.e., AZT), 3'-fluoro-2',3'-dideoxynucleosides (i.e., FLT), 2',3'-didehydro-2',3'-dideoxynucleosides (i.e., D4C, D4T) and carbocyclic derivatives thereof (i.e., carbovir), 2'-fluoro-ara-2',3'-dideoxynucleosides, 1,3-dioxolane derivatives (i.e., 2',3'-dideoxyl-3'-thiacytidine), oxetanocin analogues and carbocyclic derivatives thereof (i.e., cyclobut-G) and the 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)adenine (PMEA) and 9-(3-fluoro-2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl)adenine (FPMPA) derivatives. These compounds need to be phosphorylated intracellularly to their triphosphate forms before they act as competitive inhibitors or alternate substrates (chain terminators) of HIV RT. The second group includes the tetrahydro-imidazo[4,5,l-jk][1,4]-benzodiazepin-2(1H)one (TIBO), 1-[(2-hydroxyethoxy)-methyl]-6-(phenylthio)thymine (HEPT), dipyrido[3,2-b:2',3'-e]-[1,4]diazepin-6-one (nevirapine) and pyridin-2(1H)one derivatives, which interact as such, noncompetitively, with a specific allosteric binding site of HIV-1 RT. Compounds belonging to the two different groups may give rise to synergism which combined, and, likewise, viral resistance to the compounds may arise through different mutations, depending on the nature of the compounds and the group to which they belong.

Adenine↗

PubMed2004

In vitro characterization of a simian immunodeficiency virus-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) chimera expressing HIV type 1 reverse transcriptase to study antiviral resistance in pigtail macaques.

Antiviral resistance is a significant obstacle in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected individuals. Because nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) specifically target HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) and do not effectively inhibit simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) RT, the development of animal models to study the evolution of antiviral resistance has been problematic. To facilitate in vivo studies of NNRTI resistance, we examined whether a SIV that causes immunopathogenesis in pigtail macaques could be made sensitive to NNRTIs. Two simian-human immunodeficiency viruses (SHIVs) were derived from the genetic background of SIV(mne): SIV-RT-YY contains RT substitutions intended to confer NNRTI susceptibility (V181Y and L188Y), and RT-SHIV(mne) contains the entire HIV-1 RT coding region. Both mutant viruses grew to high titers in vitro but had reduced fitness relative to wild-type SIV(mne). Although the HIV-1 RT was properly processed into p66 and p51 subunits in RT-SHIV(mne) particles, the RT-SHIV(mne) virions had lower levels of RT per viral genomic RNA than HIV-1. Correspondingly, there was decreased RT activity in RT-SHIV(mne) and SIV-RT-YY particles. HIV-1 and RT-SHIV(mne) were similarly susceptible to the NNRTIs efavirenz, nevirapine, and UC781. However, SIV-RT-YY was less sensitive to NNRTIs than HIV-1 or RT-SHIV(mne). Classical NNRTI resistance mutations were selected in RT-SHIV(mne) after in vitro drug treatment and were monitored in a sensitive allele-specific real-time RT-PCR assay. Collectively, these results indicate that RT-SHIV(mne) may be a useful model in macaques for the preclinical evaluation of NNRTIs and for studies of the development of drug resistance in vivo.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2005

Polymorphism and drug-selected mutations in the reverse transcriptase gene of HIV-2 from patients living in southeastern France.

Few data are available about the susceptibility and the genotypic resistance pattern of human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). The HIV-2 reverse transcriptase (RT) gene from 25 HIV-2-infected patients followed-up in Marseilles and the surrounding area was analyzed. The aims of this study were to characterize the polymorphism of HIV-2 RT in the absence of drug, to determine whether it naturally harbors codons associated with drug-resistance in HIV-1, and to identify mutations emerging under NRTI-selective pressure. Fourteen patients had never undergone antiretroviral therapy and 11 received NRTI. Seventy sequences were analyzed. In untreated patients, 12 spots of high natural polymorphism (at positions 10, 11, 20, 43, 104, 121, 135, 162, 176, 180, 200, and 227) were observed; 4 of them were specific of HIV-2 (10, 176, 180, 227). Moreover, results showed four positions that could be associated with natural resistance to NRTI (75I, 118I, 219E, and perhaps 215S), in addition to those described previously for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) (181I, 188L, 190A). In HIV-2-infected patients receiving NRTI-containing therapies, specific genotypic patterns were observed with a high frequency of mutation Q151M (in 45% of patients) often associated with 70R, 115F, 214L, and/or 223R, which might compose an HIV-2 multi-NRTI resistance complex. Four newly or rarely described NRTI-selected mutations were observed: I5V, K35R, F214L, and K223R. As in HIV-1, substitution M184V was found in 3TC-treated patients. In conclusion, these findings highlight the need for specific guidelines for determining genotypic resistance and treatment of HIV-2.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Sequencing to NRTI plus NNRTI-only combinations after virological failure of protease inhibitor-based combination HIV-1 therapy.

PURPOSE: To examine the success of sequencing to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) plus nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-only combinations after virological failure of protease inhibitor (PI)-based combinations in NNRTI-naïve individuals. METHOD: This was an observational cohort study. RESULTS: 171 patients were identified. The group was highly antiretroviral therapy-experienced with median cumulative NRTI and PI durations prior to change of 53 months and 21 months, respectively. The median CD4 count and viral load (VL) prior to change were 228 cells/mm(3) and 24500 copies/mL. Overall, 37.4% had a VL below the limit of detection (50 copies/mL) at 12 months (intention-to-treat analysis). Markers associated with success at 12 months were efavirenz (EFV) use, the use of three NRTI+NNRTI combinations, and abacavir (ABC) use. In multivariate analysis, use of EFV remained highly significant (relative hazard of virological success of nevirapine [NVP] vs. EFV = 0.39; p =.003), while ABC use became nonsignificant. A benefit from the use of three NRTI + NNRTI regimens was observed. CONCLUSION: NRTI plus NNRTI-only combinations performed poorly, however the superior outcomes of patients treated with EFV are consistent with findings in cohort studies. The suggestion of benefit in patients receiving three NRTIs in addition to either NVP or EFV deserves further study in randomized trials.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Immunologic response to antiretroviral therapy in hepatitis C virus-coinfected adults in a population-based HIV/AIDS treatment program.

BACKGROUND: We sought to characterize the impact that hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has on CD4 cells during the first 48 weeks of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in previously ART-naive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. METHODS: The HIV/AIDS Drug Treatment Programme at the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS distributes all ART in this Canadian province. Eligible individuals were those whose first-ever ART included 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and either a protease inhibitor or a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and who had a documented positive result for HCV antibody testing. Outcomes were binary events (time to an increase of > or = 75 CD4 cells/mm3 or an increase of > or = 10% in the percentage of CD4 cells in the total T cell population [CD4 cell fraction]) and continuous repeated measures. Statistical analyses used parametric and nonparametric methods, including multivariate mixed-effects linear regression analysis and Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: Of 1186 eligible patients, 606 (51%) were positive and 580 (49%) were negative for HCV antibodies. HCV antibody-positive patients were slower to have an absolute (P<.001) and a fraction (P = .02) CD4 cell event. In adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis (controlling for age, sex, baseline absolute CD4 cell count, baseline pVL, type of ART initiated, AIDS diagnosis at baseline, adherence to ART regimen, and number of CD4 cell measurements), HCV antibody-positive patients were less likely to have an absolute CD4 cell event (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.84 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.98]) and somewhat less likely to have a CD4 cell fraction event (AHR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.70-1.14]) than HCV antibody-negative patients. In multivariate mixed-effects linear regression analysis, HCV antibody-negative patients had increases of an average of 75 cells in the absolute CD4 cell count and 4.4% in the CD4 cell fraction, compared with 20 cells and 1.1% in HCV antibody-positive patients, during the first 48 weeks of ART, after adjustment for time-updated pVL, number of CD4 cell measurements, and other factors. CONCLUSION: HCV antibody-positive HIV-infected patients may have an altered immunologic response to ART.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMed2000

Prevalence of multiple dideoxynucleoside analogue resistance (MddNR) in a multicenter cohort of HIV-1-infected Italian patients with virologic failure.

We evaluated the prevalence of both Q151M and 6-bp insert at position 69 of RT region responsible for multiple dideoxynucleoside analogue-resistant (MddNR) HIV-1 variants in 177 patients who failed to respond to combination therapy. Patients had received protease inhibitors (PI) and/or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) after a long-term experience with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) (including zidovudine monotherapy). Two of 177 patients (1.1%) showed the specific complex of Q151M mutation, while 4 (2.3%) had the 69 6-bp insert. Mutations that belong to the 151 set in the absence of the pivotal Q151M substitution were detected in as many as 3.9% of the patients. One patient exhibited a 69S [VG] insert that has not been previously phenotypically characterized. This HIV-1 isolate had high levels of resistance to all NRTIs except stavudine. MddNR is an emerging problem after sequential therapy with this class of compounds among HIV-1-infected patients. Either didanosine (ddI) or zidovudine (ZDV) monotherapy allowed the emergence of MddNR variants containing Q151M complex. Monotherapy with ZDV and ddI or subsequent treatments with various NRTI combinations were the common background in the patients with the 69 insert. The overall prevalence of MddNR (3.4%) in Italy is comparable with that observed in several other European countries (3.4%-6.5%). These data suggest that patients failed by NRTI regimens should be analyzed for the presence of both patterns of MddNR.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMedDate not supplied

A pilot study of switch to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy from nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based therapy.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of switching HIV-infected patients with stable viral suppression on nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor/nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI/NRTI) therapy to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy. METHOD: Eligible patients discontinued NNRTI and started LPV/r. Two weeks later NRTIs were stopped and LPV/r monotherapy was continued. Patients were seen every 4 weeks throughout the 48-week study. RESULTS: Twelve of 18 (66%) participants met the primary endpoint with HIV RNA <75 copies/mL at week 48. Thirteen (72%) participants completed 48 weeks of LPV/r monotherapy, and 12 of 13 (92%) participants on treatment at week 48 had HIV RNA <75 copies/mL. Ten (55%) of 18 patients maintained HIV RNA <75 copies/mL at all time points. Two patients were withdrawn with virologic failure but demonstrated no evidence of virologic resistance. Three (17%) patients withdrew due to diarrhea, 2 with hyperglycemia at baseline developed diabetes mellitus, 7 (54%) required addition of or increase in lipid-lowering agents, but none had grade 3 or 4 hyperlipidemia. CONCLUSION: Results from this pilot study suggest that LPV/r monotherapy may be an option for management of HIV infection. Larger, randomized trials are warranted to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and patient population who might benefit from LPV/r monotherapy.

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active↗

PubMed2005

[Treatment of the human immunodeficiency virus in adults in 2005].

Antiretroviral treatments have transformed the prognosis for patients with HIV infection. However, because the treatment is only virostatic and has substantial side effects, especially in the long term, it should not be proposed to all HIV-infected patients but only to symptomatic patients or asymptomatic patients with immune deficiency (CD4 cell count < 350/mm3). The aim of antiretrovirals is to lower the viral load to undetectable levels for prolonged periods and thus enable immune reconstitution and prevent selection of resistant mutants. In initiating treatment, the preferred options are a combination of 2 HIV nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors associated with either a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or a protease inhibitor, the latter with a low dose of ritonavir. Optimal compliance is the key to successful treatment and requires that the aims of the antiretroviral therapy be clearly explained to the patient. Treatment failure usually occurs in two types of situations. Failure after an initial regimen is often related to poor compliance and sometimes to interactions between drugs. Conversely, in patients for whom several regimens have failed, the accumulation of resistant mutations compromises the antiretroviral activity. Genotype resistance tests help in the choice of a new treatment regimen that should ideally include at least 2 active molecules. In these situations the new antiviral drugs with novel mechanisms of action, such as the entrance inhibitors, are clearly of interest.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Strategies in the design of prodrugs of anti-HIV agents.

Control of AIDS requires development of special therapeutic strategies in order to reduce the level of monocyte/macrophage HIV infection, to prevent spread of HIV within the monocyte/macrophage reservoir, to maintain a therapeutically effective drug concentration in sanctuaries such as the brain and to overcome the problem of cellular resistance mechanisms. A popular approach towards this end has been the development of prodrugs of anti-HIV drugs. This review covers the different strategies devised for the design of prodrugs of anti-HIV agents with emphasis on the recent findings in this field of research. Thus, prodrugs of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) including, 5'-O carboxylic ester derivatives, 5'-O- monophosphate analogues, macromolecular derivatives, prodrugs of purine nucleosides, prodrugs of acyclic nucleosides, homo and hetero dinucleotides, prodrugs of non-classical nucleoside analogues, boranophosphate triesters of NRTIs, and prodrugs of protease inhibitors including acyl-substituted prodrugs, prodrugs with increased water solubility, monophosphate prodrugs, and conjugates of HIV protease inhibitors with a reverse transcriptase inhibitor through spontaneously cleavable linkers, constitute the subject of this review.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

PubMed2006

Comparison of a rule-based algorithm with a phenotype-based algorithm for the interpretation of HIV genotypes in guiding salvage regimens in HIV-infected patients by a randomized clinical trial: the mutations and salvage study.

BACKGROUND: There is still considerable uncertainty as to the best algorithm for interpreting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) genotyping results. METHODS: A total of 318 subjects with HIV RNA levels of >1000 copies/mL were enrolled in 41 centers throughout Italy from 2001 through 2003, stratified on the basis of their drug history, randomized (1:1) to 2 arms to have their treatments modified on the basis of the results of HIV genotyping (as interpreted by virtual phenotype analysis or with use of a rule-based interpretation system), and followed up for 48 weeks. At least 1 nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor and 1 protease inhibitor had to be included in any new regimen; nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor-naive patients were also prescribed a nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor. Only drugs licensed in Italy were allowed. The primary end point was a decrease in HIV RNA level to <400 copies/mL by week 12 according to on-treatment analysis. RESULTS: The mean (+/- standard deviation) values at baseline were as follows: HIV RNA level, 4.1+/-0.74 log(10) copies/mL; CD4(+) T lymphocyte count, 410+/-262 cells/microL; reverse-transcriptase mutations, 4.8+/-2.9; and protease mutations, 2.8+/-2.5. There were 133 patients (41.8%) who were nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor naive and protease inhibitor experienced, 63 patients (19.8%) who were nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor experienced and protease inhibitor naive, and 122 patients (38.4%) who were 3-class experienced. A total of 192 patients completed 12 weeks of the treatment regimen assigned at baseline; at 12 weeks, 66.3% of patients in the virtual phenotype arm and 71.3% of patients in the rule-based interpretation arm had HIV RNA levels of <400 copies/mL (P = .46). No statistically significant difference between arms was observed by intention-to-treat analysis. CONCLUSION: Both the virtual phenotype and rule-based interpretation methods of HIV genotyping can guide the selection of effective antiretroviral drugs for a salvage regimen.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Highlights in the development of new antiviral agents.

The potential of a large variety of new compounds and new strategies for the treatment of virtually all major virus infections has been addressed. This includes, for the treatment of HIV infections, virus adsorption inhibitors (cosalane derivatives, cyanovirin-N), co-receptor antagonists (TAK-779, AMD3100), viral fusion inhibitors (pentafuside T-20, betulinic acid derivatives), viral uncoating inhibitors (azodicarbonamide), nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs: emtricitabine, amdoxovir, dOTC, d4TMP prodrugs, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs: thiocarboxanilide UC-781, capravirine, SJ-3366, DPC 083, TMC 125/R165335), integrase inhibitors (diketo acids), transcription inhibitors (temacrazine, flavopiridol), protease inhibitors (atazanavir, mozenavir, tipranavir); for the treatment of RSV and paramyxovirus infections, viral fusion inhibitors (R170591, VP-14637, NMS03); for the treatment of picornavirus infections, viral uncoating inhibitors (pleconaril); for the treatment of pesti- (hepaci-, flavi-) virus infections, RNA replicase inhibitors (VP-32947); for the treatment of herpesvirus (HSV, VZV, CMV) infections, DNA polymerase inhibitors (A-5021, L- and D-cyclohexenylguanine); for the treatment of VZV infections, bicyclic furopyrimidine analogues; for the treatment of CMV infections, fomivirsen; for the treatment of DNA virus infections at large (papilloma-, polyoma-, herpes-, adeno- and poxvirus infections), cidofovir; for the treatment of influenza, neuraminidase inhibitors (zanamivir, oseltamivir, RWJ-270201); for the treatment of HBV infections, adefovir dipivoxil; for the treatment of HBV and HCV infections, N-glycosylation inhibitors (N-nonyl-deoxynojirimycin); and, finally, IMP dehydrogenase inhibitors and S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase inhibitors, for the treatment of various virus infections, including hemorrhagic fever virus infections.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2005

Transfer of antivirals across the human placenta.

BACKGROUND: Viruses cross the placenta and infect the fetus. Antivirals are administered to pregnant women to protect them and the fetus against the viruses. It is necessary to know which antivirals cross the placenta and reach the fetal circulation in pharmacologically significant concentrations in order to plan antiviral therapy. AIMS: This article reviews the literature on the placental transfer of antivirals against HIV. The review considers also the placental transfer of acyclovir and ganciclovir, which are used against the herpes simplex virus and the cytomegalovirus, respectively. STUDY DESIGN: Firstly, a medline was performed with the following key words "placental transfer of antivirals". Secondly, a medline was performed with the key words "placenta transfer of..." followed by the name of a single antiviral and it was repeated for 20 antivirals. Thirdly, another medline was performed using the following key words "pharmacokinetics of antiviral in newborn" in order to collect those articles which describe in vivo transfer of antivirals. The literature was critically read and a written note was produced. RESULTS: The literature on the placental transfer of antivirals includes studies in vitro perfusing the human placenta and studies performed in vivo in which the cord and maternal antiviral plasma concentrations are compared. Both the results obtained in vitro and in vivo show that the protease inhibitors poorly transfer the placenta because of their great molecular weight. With the exception of didanosine, the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and nelfinavir, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, cross the placenta and the cord, and maternal plasma concentrations equilibrate. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro and in vivo results are consistent with the view that the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors cross the human placenta and produce significant pharmacological concentrations in the fetal circulation. Nevirapine, the only studied non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, reach the equilibrium between the fetal and maternal concentration, whereas the protease inhibitors have a poor transfer across the human placenta.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Reappearance of HIV multidrug-resistance in plasma and circulating lymphocytes after reintroduction of antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: After the discontinuation of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients with highly resistant virus, the detectability of viral resistance mutations quickly decreases. To which extent this represents a true loss of resistance or rather a detectability phenomenon remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To monitor virologic response and resistance pattern during a non-strategic treatment interruption in the presence of highly drug-resistant viral strains. STUDY DESIGN: We performed serial genotypic resistance analyses on viral DNA isolated from a patient with a multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus infection who discontinued and later on reintroduced antiretroviral therapy. Sequencing was performed on viral DNA from plasma as well as DNA from circulating leukocytes. RESULTS: While under combination antiretroviral therapy with two nucleosidic reverse transcriptase inhibitors, a non-nucleosidic reverse transcriptase inhibitor and a protease inhibitor, the viral load of the patient was around five logs. Genotypic resistance to all available agents was detected during this time. Antiretroviral therapy was then interrupted, and 14 weeks later an almost complete reversion of the virus to wild type was observed. After introduction of a new antiretroviral therapy regimen, the reappearance of nearly all of the formerly present resistance mutations had to be noted within 6 weeks, including mutations without known relation to any of the drugs in the new regimen. CONCLUSIONS: We obviously observed not the de novo appearance of a complex resistance pattern under just 6 weeks of potent antiretroviral therapy, but a reappearing archival strain of the virus. This finding provides evidence for subdetectable persistence of resistant variants during treatment interruptions. Therefore, resistance analyses from peripheral blood performed in times of treatment interruptions should be interpreted with caution as they may provide incomplete information about the resistance profile soon after reintroduction of therapy.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Transplacentally exposed human and monkey newborn infants show similar evidence of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-induced mitochondrial toxicity.

Effective reduction in maternal-fetal human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) transmission has been achieved by administration of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) during pregnancy, and although most exposed children are clinically normal at birth, mitochondrial dysfunction has been reported. To examine mitochondrial integrity on a molecular level, we evaluated mitochondrial morphology by electron microscopy (EM) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) quantity in umbilical cords and cord blood from NRTI-exposed and unexposed human and monkey newborns. Human subjects included infants born to HIV-1-infected mothers who received Combivir (Zidovudine [AZT] plus Lamivudine [3TC]) (n = 9) or AZT plus Didanosine [ddI] (n = 2) during pregnancy, and infants born to HIV-1-uninfected mothers (n = 7). NRTI-exposed Erythrocebus patas monkey dams (n = 3 per treatment group) were given human-equivalent dosing regimens containing 3TC, AZT/3TC, AZT/ddI, or Stavudine (d4T)/3TC during gestation. Four infants born to unexposed patas dams served as controls. Mitochondria in umbilical cord endothelial cells from NRTI-exposed monkey and human infants showed substantial abnormal pathology by EM, the extent of which was quantified from coded photomicrographs and shown to be different (P < 0.05) from the unexposed monkey and human newborns. Significant (P < 0.05) mtDNA depletion was found in umbilical cords from both human and monkey NRTI-exposed infants and in human, but not in monkey, cord blood leukocytes. For umbilical cords, an increase in mitochondrial morphological damage correlated with reduction in mtDNA quantity in fetal monkeys (r = 0.94). The treatment-induced mitochondrial compromise in infant monkeys ranked as follows: d4T/3TC > AZT/ddI > AZT/3TC > 3TC. The study demonstrates that transplacental NRTI exposures induce similar mitochondrial damage in cord blood and umbilical cords taken from retroviral-uninfected monkey infants and from human infants born to HIV-1-infected women.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

High frequency of Fredrickson's phenotypes IV and IIb in Brazilians infected by human immunodeficiency virus.

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is very prevalent in Brazil. HIV therapy has been recently associated with coronary heart disease (CHD). Dyslipidemia is a major risk factor for CHD that is frequently described in HIV positive patients, but very few studies have been conducted in Brazilian patients evaluating their lipid profiles. METHODS: In the present work, we evaluated the frequency and severity of dyslipidemia in 257 Brazilian HIV positive patients. Two hundred and thirty-eight (93%) were submitted to antiretroviral therapy (224 treated with protease inhibitors plus nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 14 treated only with the latter, 12 naive and 7 had no records of treatment). The average time on drug treatment with antiretroviral therapy was 20 months. None of the patients was under lipid lowering drugs. Cholesterol, triglyceride, phospholipid and free fatty acids were determined by enzymatic colorimetric methods. Lipoprotein profile was estimated by the Friedewald formula and Fredrickson's phenotyping was obtained by serum electrophoresis on agarose. Apolipoprotein B and AI and lipoprotein "a" were measured by nephelometry. RESULTS: The Fredrickson phenotypes were: type IIb (51%), IV (41%), IIa (7%). In addition one patient was type III and another type V. Thirty-three percent of all HIV+ patients presented serum cholesterol levels >or= 200 mg/dL, 61% LDL-cholesterol >or= 100 mg/dL, 65% HDL-cholesterol below 40 mg/dL, 46% triglycerides >or= 150 mg/dL and 10% have all these parameters above the limits. Eighty-six percent of patients had cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio >or= 3.5, 22% increased lipoprotein "a", 79% increased free fatty acids and 9% increased phospholipids. The treatment with protease inhibitors plus nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors increased the levels of cholesterol and triglycerides in these patients when compared with naïve patients. The HDL-cholesterol (p = 0.01) and apolipoprotein A1 (p = 0.02) levels were inversely correlated with the time of protease inhibitor therapy while total cholesterol levels had a trend to correlate with antiretroviral therapy (p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: The highly varied and prevalent types of dyslipidemia found in Brazilian HIV positive patients on antiretroviral therapies indicate the urgent need for their early diagnosis, the identification of the risk factors for CHD and, when needed, the prompt intervention on their lifestyle and/or with drug treatment.

Anti-HIV Agents↗