PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Contraindications”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 973 records · Page 54Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Is Operative Laparoscopy Contraindicated in Women with Ectopic Pregnancy and Hypovolemic Shock?

We evaluated the safety of operative laparoscopy for the management of ectopic pregnancy in 119 women with hypovolemic shock. In 19 (16.0%) of these women hypovolemic shock was based on a combination of signs and symptoms including hypotension, tachycardia, anxiety, thirst, tachypnea, and slow capillary refill. The table below presents the results (mean &plusmn; SEM; ap <0.01). One case in each group was converted to laparotomy, and all patients made full recovery. Laparoscopy allows rapid diagnosis and control of the source of bleeding, making it highly suitable for the surgical management of a ruptured ectopic pregnancy. The availability of appropriate anesthesia and advanced cardiovascular monitoring, and ability to convert rapidly to a laparotomy if necessary, allow safe performance of operative laparoscopic surgery in women with hypovolemic shock.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2002

[Is it possible to organize into a hierarchy blood donation contraindications?].

Because it symbolizes henceforth the sanitary risk and fears which are linked to it, the blood transfusion must master the potential or real risks associated to its practice. The analysis of these risks leads to confirm the initial selection phase of candidates for blood donation as an always original stage of the blood transfusion safety towards the identified infectious risks, but also mainly towards the emergent or modelled risks. The evaluation of the current system of prevention leads to consider two potential dangers: the ineffectiveness of the selection because of the lack of meaning given to this stage, and the donors' disaffection caused by badly accepted or badly justified deferrals. The deficit of meaning can be due to an insufficient information of the population as for the policy of collective prevention of transfusion-transmitted infectious diseases. It can be worsened by the construction of the pre-donation interview which can appear as a succession of questions without visible links. This paper suggests risk analysis to blood transfusion, and a reflection to improve this important stage of blood product safety approach represent by the selection of candidates to a blood donation.

Blood Donors↗