PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Prostate Cancer”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 973 records · Page 54Linked to original sources

Bicalutamide monotherapy versus flutamide plus goserelin in prostate cancer patients: results of an Italian Prostate Cancer Project study.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of bicalutamide monotherapy to maximal androgen blockade (MAB) in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with histologically proven stage C or D disease (American Urological Association Staging System) were randomly allocated to receive either bicalutamide or MAB. After disease progression, patients treated with bicalutamide were assigned to castration. The primary end point for this trial was overall survival. Secondary end points included response to treatment, disease progression, treatment safety, quality-of-life (QOL), and sexual function. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients received bicalutamide and 112 received MAB. There was no difference in the percentage of patients whose prostate-specific antigen returned to normal levels. At the time of the present analysis (median follow-up time, 38 months; range, 1 to 60 months), 129 patients progressed and 89 died. There was no difference in the duration of either progression-free survival or overall survival. However, a survival trend favored bicalutamide in stage C disease but MAB in stage D disease. Overall and subgroup trends were confirmed by multivariate analysis. Serious adverse events and treatment discontinuations were more common in patients receiving MAB (P =.08 and P =.04, respectively). Fewer patients in the bicalutamide group complained of loss of libido (P =. 01) and of erectile dysfunction (P =.002). Significant trends favored bicalutamide-treated patients also with respect to their QOL, namely relative to social functioning, vitality, emotional well-being, and physical capacity. CONCLUSION: Bicalutamide monotherapy yielded comparable results relative to standard treatment with MAB, induced fewer side effects, and produced a better QOL.

Adult↗

Comparison of screen detected and clinically diagnosed prostate cancer in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, section rotterdam.

PURPOSE: This report provides a comparison of characteristics detected in the screening and control arms of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, section Rotterdam. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between December 1993 and January 1999, 35,148 men 55 to 74 years old were randomized to European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Rotterdam, including 17,635 in the screening arm and 17,513 in the control arm. Prostate specific antigen testing, digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound and sextant biopsies were offered to all participants in the screening arm according to 2 algorithms. All screening detected cancers and cancers found in the control arm were evaluated at the same cutoff point, that is January 1, 2003. To identify prostate cancer cases in the control arm yearly linkage was performed with the Rotterdam Cancer Registry database. Followup information was collected by chart review. RESULTS: By January 1, 2003, 1,269 cancers were detected in the screening arm and 336 were detected in the control arm. A shift to more favorable clinical stages and histological grades on biopsy was seen in the screening arm of the trial. T1C and T2 cancers were 5.8 and 6.2 times more often diagnosed, respectively, in the screening arm than in the control arm of the trial. Only 4.6% of control arm cancers were found through opportunistic screening. CONCLUSIONS: Although a favorable shift in prognostic factors was seen for the screening arm of the trial, these results do not provide evidence that prostate cancer screening has an effect on prostate cancer mortality.

Aged↗

The changing pattern of prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis: characteristics of screen detected prostate cancer in a population based screening study.

PURPOSE: We describe the clinical and pathological features of prostate cancer diagnosed through serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in a population based randomized screening study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 1993 and June 1997, 20,632 volunteers 55 to 76 years old were included in the study. In the screening arm 9,776 men underwent digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound and serum PSA determination. Biopsies were taken if the digital rectal examination and/or transrectal ultrasound findings were abnormal or if PSA was 4 ng/ml or greater. A total of 2,262 men underwent biopsy and 474 cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed. RESULTS: The pretreatment data were complete in 459 men, of whom 78% had clinically organ confined disease. Bone or lymph node metastases were seen in 8 cases (1.7%). Of 172 men who underwent radical prostatectomy 2 had lymph node metastases. Overall 66.3% of men treated with radical prostatectomy had organ confined disease. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of the characteristics of prostate cancer detected through screening of the general population with those in a population based cohort of men in which there was no organized screening revealed stage reduction, primarily with regard to number of metastatic cases. Whether this stage reduction will lead to a decrease in disease specific mortality remains unknown until the study is completed and the end point of prostate cancer specific mortality is evaluated.

Aged↗

Is one set of sextant biopsies enough to rule out prostate Cancer? Influence of transition and total prostate volumes on prostate cancer yield.

PURPOSE: Although the sextant biopsy technique has been widely used, concern has arisen that this method may not include an adequate sampling of the prostate, especially for large prostate volumes. We conducted a multicenter study in patients with PSA levels <10 ng/ml to determine the influence of the total and transition zone (TZ) volumes of the prostate for predicting whether one single set of biopsies was sufficient to rule out prostate cancer (PCa). These parameters were evaluated in patients in whom PCa was found after one set of systematic sextant biopsies and those in whom PCa was found after a repeat biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,018 patients were included in this study. All underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided needle sextant and two TZ biopsies of the prostate. Total and TZ volumes of the prostate were measured (prolate ellipsoid method). From this cohort, all patients in whom a benign disease was found after the first set of biopsies underwent a second similar set of biopsies within 6 weeks. Only patients with PCa were included in this study, whether diagnosed on first or repeat biopsy. Uni- and multivariate statistical analysis using the SAS system (Cary, N.C., USA) and ROC curves were used to compare patients in whom the diagnosis was performed after the first set of biopsies and those who required a second set. RESULTS: Of the 1,018 patients, 344 (33.8%) had PCa diagnosed, 285 (28%) after the first set of biopsies, and 59 (8.1%) on repeat biopsy. As compared to patients diagnosed with PCa after the first set of biopsies, patients diagnosed after the second set had larger total prostate and TZ volumes (43.1+/-13.0 vs. 32.5+/-10.6 cm(3), p<0.0001 and 20.5+/-8.3 vs. 12.8+/-6.0 cm(3), p<0.0001). ROC curves showed that total and TZ volumes of 45 and 22. 5 cm(3), respectively, provided the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for discriminating between patients diagnosed with PCa after the first from those diagnosed after a second set. CONCLUSION: In patients with total prostate volume >45 cm(3) and TZ >22.5 cm(3), a single set of sextant biopsies may not be sufficient to rule out PCa. In these patients, a repeat biopsy should be considered in case of a negative first biopsy.

Aged↗

Recombinant vaccinia-PSA (PROSTVAC) can induce a prostate-specific immune response in androgen-modulated human prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Prostate cancer recurrence, evidenced by rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after radical prostatectomy, is an increasingly prevalent clinical problem in need of new treatment options. Preclinical studies have suggested that for tumors in general, settings of minimal cancer volume may be uniquely suitable for recombinant vaccine therapy targeting tumor-associated antigens. A clinical study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and biologic effects of vaccinia-PSA (PROSTVAC) administered to subjects with postprostatectomy recurrence of prostate cancer and to assess the feasibility of interrupted androgen deprivation as a tool for modulating expression of the vaccine target antigen, as well as detecting vaccine bioactivity in vivo. METHODS: A limited Phase I clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and biologic effects of vaccinia-PSA administered in 6 patients with androgen-modulated recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. End points included toxicity, serum PSA rise related to serum testosterone restoration, and immunologic effects measured by Western blot analysis for anti-PSA antibody induction. RESULTS: Toxicity was minimal, and dose-limiting toxicity was not observed. Noteworthy variability in time required for testosterone restoration (after interruption of androgen deprivation therapy) was observed. One subject showed continued undetectable serum PSA (less than 0.2 ng/mL) for over 8 months after testosterone restoration, an interval longer than those reported in previous androgen deprivation interruption studies. Primary anti-PSA IgG antibody activity was induced after vaccinia-PSA immunization in 1 subject, although such antibodies were detectable in several subjects at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Interrupted androgen deprivation may be a useful tool for modulating prostate cancer bioactivity in clinical trials developing novel biologic therapies. Immune responses against PSA may be present among some patients with prostate cancer at baseline and may be induced in others through vaccinia-PSA immunization.

Androgen Antagonists↗

Using predictive value, sensitivity and specificity to interpret laboratory tests: PSA for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial yields a means to evaluate PSA screening for prostate cancer detection. The receiver operating characteristic curve shows that PSA above 2.5 provides optimum sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer diagnosis by needle biopsy. However, the maximum positive predictive value of 48% occurs at PSA above 4.0 and does not increase at higher PSA cutpoints. Consideration of test sensitivity and specificity alone is not sufficient for optimal interpretation of test results.

Humans↗

Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute and American total mortality rates, the authors calculated the probability at birth of having a diagnosis of prostate cancer within a man's life to be 8.8% and then subtracted the incidence of microscopic Stage A cancers too small to ever be clinically significant. This gave a final probability of 8%. METHODS: Prostates were examined after 139 consecutive unselected cystoprostatectomies from patients with bladder cancers in whom it was unknown whether they had prostate cancer. Prostate cancer was found in 55 patients (40%); the volume of the largest cancer in each specimen was determined using histologic morphometry. The authors identified the 8% of these 139 cytoprostatectomy specimens with the largest volume of prostate cancer. RESULTS: The largest 11 of the 55 cancers represented 7.9% of the total 139 samples. These cancers ranged in volume from 0.5-6.1 ml, representing only 20% of all patients with prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: If the strong evidence is accepted that cancer progression is proportional to cancer volume, it was concluded that prostate cancers larger than 0.5 ml appear to correspond to the 8% of men who will be diagnosed with a clinically significant carcinoma, as derived previously. Conversely, those 80% of prostate cancers smaller than 0.5 ml probably are not likely to reach a clinically significant size in view of the long doubling time of this cancer.

Adult↗

Attitudes and practices of primary care physicians for prostate cancer screening.

Prostate cancer screening with digital rectal examination (DRE) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is recommended by several professional organizations. Our objective was to assess the prostate cancer screening practices and attitudes reported by primary care physicians. We randomly surveyed 454 Arizona primary care physicians, subsequently excluding 124 ineligible subjects. Overall, 141 of 329 eligible physicians completed the survey (42.9%). Survey data included physician demographics, practice characteristics, screening and follow-up strategies, and attitudes toward screening. One hundred thirty-one physicians (93%) reported screening asymptomatic men with DRE or PSA. Respondents generally agreed that screening tests were accurate and that early detection was beneficial. Screening began at an average patient age of 45 years, though 7.8% of respondents began screening men younger than 40 years and 7.0% began screening men older than 50 years. PSA levels ranging from 3.9 to 40 ng/mL were considered abnormal, and 11.6% of respondents used a cutpoint higher than 10 ng/mL. Primary care physicians report a high rate of screening for prostate cancer and consider PSA and DRE accurate and useful tests. Screening practices, however, varied considerably between physicians. The screening of younger men reported by practitioners would tend to increase the rate of false-positive tests, while using a high cutpoint for PSA and delaying screening beyond age 50 years would decrease the chance for early detection. These screening practices may increase health care costs without necessarily leading to improved health outcomes. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): prostatic neoplasms, prostate-specific antigen, primary health care, screening.

Adult↗

The prostate specific antigen. Its use as a tumor marker for prostate cancer.

The prostate specific antigen (PSA) has had an enormous impact on the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. Use of the PSA has strikingly increased the diagnosis of prostate cancer since its introduction and widespread application in clinical practice. This article examines the assay characteristics of PSA, its utility in early detection of prostate cancer, and its use in facilitating treatment decisions.

Combined Modality Therapy↗

Evaluation of a low-invasive strategy for prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a two-step strategy for the detection of prostate cancer within the context of serial screening and compare this strategy with other screening strategies. The optimal combination of tests proposed for prostate cancer screening remains undetermined, particularly when screening is repeated over time. METHODS: A prospective serial prostate cancer screening study with follow-up to 55 months was performed in a general community screening clinic. One thousand seven hundred seven self-referred men, 50 to 75 years old, without a history of prostate cancer agreed to undergo screening for prostate cancer on an annual basis. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement was the first-step screening test. If the serum PSA test was positive, a standard urologic evaluation was performed. Biopsy was recommended only if a test other than serum PSA was suspicious for cancer. The outcome measures were the biopsy rate and prostate cancer detection rate. The comparisons with other studies were age-standardized to correct for differences in age distribution. RESULTS: The biopsy and cancer detection rates after the first test were 7.0% and 2.0%, respectively. After 4 years of the study, the cumulative biopsy rate and cumulative cancer detection rate per enrolled man was 12% and 4.1%, respectively. The comparisons between studies revealed that screening strategies using serum PSA as a first-line test had similar detection rates but lower biopsy rates than strategies performing biopsy when one of several screening tests was positive. CONCLUSIONS: A two-step screening strategy using serum PSA alone as the initial test seemed able to detect as many cancers as when all screening tests were used at the same time but reduced the number of unnecessary biopsies.

Aged↗

[Mass screening for prostate cancer is the best approach to early diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer].

To achieve the goal of early detection, diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer in China, mass screening for prostate cancer using serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) has been performed in men over 50 years. We compared this result with the clinical cases. It proved that only through the mass screening can we really find the early stage prostate cancer and be given the chance of curing the cancer. We also investigated the current treatment situation and problems and figured out the further direction on the prostate cancer research.

Aged↗

Prostate specific antigen inhibits immune responses in vitro: a potential role in prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Prostate specific antigen (PSA) is found in high concentration in prostate tissue and in semen, in which its physiological function appears to be liquefaction. In prostate cancer the peripheral PSA concentration is elevated, which may be used as a disease marker. Systemic and local immune defects have been demonstrated in prostate cancer and we postulated a role for PSA in this immunosuppression. We explored the effects of PSA on human T-lymphocyte proliferation in vitro. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PSA was purified from normal seminal plasma using a modified chromatographic technique. The effect of PSA or control protein on lymphocyte responses to mitogens, tetanus toxoid and alloantigens was tested. The inhibitory effect observed was further explored by varying the time of PSA addition, denaturing PSA and including interleukin-2 and anti-PSA antibodies. RESULTS: PSA suppressed in vitro phytohemagglutinin and alloantigen stimulated lymphocyte proliferation in a dose dependent manner. This effect was reversed by adding anti-PSA antibodies but not by interleukin-2. CONCLUSIONS: These in vitro PSA effects suggest another T-lymphocyte mediated immunosuppressive mechanism. In vivo high levels of PSA may compromise natural immune responses to cancer and current attempts at immunotherapy for prostate cancer.

Disease Progression↗

[Prostate cancer chemoprevention].

Prostatic cancer is the most common malignancy diagnosed in men. Chemoprevention of prostatic cancer is a relatively new concept and seems to be a very promising strategy for preventing and arresting the development of this neoplasm. There is much evidence that the increased consumption of selenium, vitamins E and D, lycopen, soy and isoflavonoids and low-fat diet reduce the risk of the incidence of prostatic cancer. Similar effect is also exhibited by some drugs including finasteride, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs and lipoxygenase inhibitors. In this paper we summarize the results of published epidemiologic and scientific studies, trying to critically evaluate the potential clinical role and mechanism of action of these agents in modern chemoprevention of this cancer.

Carotenoids↗

DNA-based detection of prostate cancer in urine after prostatic massage.

OBJECTIVES: Promoter hypermethylation of the glutathione-S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) gene is a specific feature of prostate cancer. This epigenetic DNA alteration served as the target for molecular detection of prostate cancer cells in urine sediments after prostatic massage. METHODS: Bisulfite treatment followed by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction was used to detect GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation in DNA isolated from urine sediments obtained after prostatic massage of men with and without prostate cancer. RESULTS: GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation was demonstrated in the sediments of 1 (2%) of 45 patients diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia, 2 (29%) of 7 patients with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, 15 (68%) of 22 patients with early, intracapsular cancer, and 14 (78%) of 18 patients with locally advanced or systemic prostate cancer, resulting in a specificity of 98% and an overall sensitivity of 73% for the detection of prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Urinalysis for GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation constitutes a sensitive and highly specific DNA-based marker for molecular detection of prostate cancer, including early stages.

Adenocarcinoma↗

APO2 ligand/tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in prostate cancer therapy.

Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men and is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the USA. Many anti-tumor agents against prostate cancer cells have been developed, but their unacceptable systemic toxicity to normal tissues usually limits their use in the clinic. Apo2 ligand (Apo2L), also called Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), is one of several members of the TNF gene superfamily that induces apoptosis through engagement of death receptors. This protein has generated tremendous enthusiasm as a potential tumor-specific cancer therapeutic because, as a stable trimer, it selectively induces apoptosis in many transformed cells, but not in most normal cells. In this review we discuss its potential use in prostate cancer therapy, the mechanisms by which induces apoptosis or that underlie resistance to it, and strategies for sensitization to overcome them. Conventional chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive drugs, irradiation, and other therapeutic agents, such as histone deacetylase inhibitors or retinoids can sensitize Apo2L/TRAIL-resistant cells and tumors. Investigating the apoptotic effects of Apo2L/TRAIL, a unique tumor-specific cell death ligand, now in clinical trials, alone or in combination may not only help in understanding its antineoplastic role in prostate carcinoma but may also provide insights into basic mechanisms of apoptosis.

Androgens↗

Percentage of core lengths involved with prostate cancer: does it add to the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in predicting postoperative prostate-specific antigen outcome for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the percentage of core lengths involved with prostate cancer added clinically significant information concerning the time to postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure in the intermediate-risk patient beyond what is provided by the percentage of positive biopsies. METHODS: Cox regression multivariable analysis was performed to compare the ability of the two measurements of biopsy cancer volume to predict the time to PSA failure from a series of 184 surgically treated intermediate-risk patients. PSA outcome was estimated using the actuarial method of Kaplan and Meier, and comparisons were made using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Both the percentage of core lengths involved with prostate cancer (P = 0.01) and the percentage of positive biopsies (P = 0.002) were significant predictors of the time to PSA failure on univariable analysis. The 4-year PSA outcome was 83% versus 47% (P = 0.0008) and 83% versus 53% (P = 0.007) for the percentage of positive biopsies stratified by 50% or less versus greater than 50% and the percentage of core lengths involved with prostate cancer stratified by 25% or less versus greater than 25%, respectively. However, only the percentage of positive biopsies remained significant (P = 0.03) on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of core lengths involved with prostate cancer did not provide additional clinically relevant information to the percentage of positive biopsies for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Therefore, the routine measurement of core involvement may not be necessary in this patient population.

Analysis of Variance↗

Differential response of prostate specific antigen to testosterone surge after luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue in prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate any differences in changes in serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels in patients with benign and malignant prostatic disease in response to the testosterone surge after administering a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 54 patients referred to the urology clinic with intermediate PSA levels (4-10 ng/mL) or an abnormal digital rectal examination. Forty-five patients received a single injection of LHRH analogue depot each at one week before prostate biopsy and nine served as a control group. Changes in PSA levels in response to the testosterone surge from the LHRH analogue were recorded after 5 and 7 days, and were correlated with the biopsy results. The PSA changes were compared with basal PSA levels and the free/total PSA ratio(f/tPSA). RESULTS: Of the 45 patients who underwent prostate biopsy, histopathology showed prostate cancer in 11, benign prostatic hyperplasia in 33 and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in one. Patients with cancer had a significantly greater increase in serum PSA levels during the first week after LHRH injection than those in the benign and control groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the percentage change in PSA level on day 5 was more diagnostic than total PSA and f/tPSA. CONCLUSIONS: There was a marked difference in the PSA response of patients with benign or malignant disease to the testosterone surge produced by the LHRH analogue. Although a larger study would be needed before LHRH-induced provocation could be proposed as a clinical test, in this small series the response was better than that for total PSA or f/tPSA in differentiating benign and malignant disease.

Aged↗