SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Ejection fraction”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 991 records · Page 55Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Determination of left ventricular ejection fraction using intravenous contrast and a semiautomated border detection algorithm.

Manual endocardial tracing using Simpson's method (MANUAL SIMP) provides an accurate assessment of left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We have previously demonstrated in patients who are difficult to image: (1) the incremental accuracy of contrast-enhanced power harmonic imaging and MANUAL SIMP in the calculation of LVEF; and (2) the use of intravenous contrast-combined MANUAL SIMP was the most accurate method of LVEF determination. However, MANUAL SIMP is time-consuming, requires accurate planimetry of the endocardial borders, and is difficult to apply routinely in the clinical situation. The current study prospectively studied the accuracy of intravenous contrast and a semiautomated endocardial border detection algorithm in the determination of LVEF in 51 patients with suboptimal images. LVEF was also calculated using contrast-enhanced power harmonic imaging and MANUAL SIMP. We demonstrated that there was good agreement between LVEF determined using both MANUAL SIMP and semiautomated endocardial border detection, and radionuclide angiography (standard of comparison).

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Variability of serial same-day left ventricular ejection fraction using quantitative gated SPECT.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of quantitative gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (QGS) and the potential limitations for estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) have been extensively evaluated. However, few studies have focused on the serial variability of QGS. This study was conducted to assess the serial variability of QGS for determination of LVEF between 2 sequential technetium 99m sestamibi-gated SPECT acquisitions at rest in both healthy and unhealthy subjects. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 2 groups: group I included 21 volunteers with a low likelihood of CAD, and group II included 22 consecutive patients with documented CAD. Both groups underwent serial SPECT imaging. The overall correlation between sequential images was high (r = 0.94, SEE = 5.3%), and the mean serial variability of LVEF was 5.15% +/- 3.51%. Serial variability was lower for images with high counts (3.45% +/- 3.23%) than for images with low counts (6.85% +/- 3.77%). The mean serial variability was not different between normal and abnormal high-dose images (3.0% +/- 1.56% vs 3.9% +/- 2.77%). However, mean serial variability for images derived from abnormal low-dose images was significantly greater than that derived from normal low-dose images (9.6% +/- 2.22% vs 3.1% +/- 2.12%, P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although QGS is an efficacious method to approximate LVEF values and is extremely valuable for incremental risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease, it has significant variability in the estimation of LVEF on serial images. This should be taken into account when used for serial evaluation of LVEF.

Adult↗

PubMed1981

Assessment of cardiac wall motion with the ejection fraction image: a comparison with contrast left ventriculography.

Twenty patients with ischemic heart disease were studied with biplane contrast left ventriculography and gated bloob pool scans. An ejection fraction (EF) image was calculated from each gated blood pool scan. The EF image and contrast ventriculograms were divided into three regions and seven segments respectively. The sites of asynergy observed in each study were compared. Segments two, three and six of the contrast ventriculogram corresponded to the anteroseptal and inferoapical regions of the EF image, but it was difficult to differentiate between these segments on the EF image. Segments three and four corresponded to the inferoapical region and segments five and seven corresponded to the posterolateral region. Diffuse asynergy with a low EF (less than 30%) causes a large defect on the EF image. The mean regional EF obtained from the EF image correlated well with the EF calculated from the left ventricular volume curve (n = 50, r = 0.94).

Angiocardiography↗

PubMed2001

Electrocardiographically gated blood-pool SPECT and left ventricular function: comparative value of 3 methods for ejection fraction and volume estimation.

UNLABELLED: The current major limitation to development of electrocardiographically (ECG) gated blood-pool SPECT (GBPS) for measurement of the left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) and volumes is the lack of availability of clinically validated automatic processing software. Recently, 2 processing software methods for quantification of the LV function have been described. Their LVEFs have been validated separately, but no validation of the LV volume measurement has been reported. METHODS: We compared 3 processing methods for evaluation of the LVEF (n = 29) and volumes (n = 58) in 29 patients: automatic geometric method (GBPS(G)), semiautomatic activity method (GBPS(M)), and 35% maximal activity manual method (GBPS(35%)). The LVEF provided by the ECG gated equilibrium planar left anterior oblique view (planar(LAO)) and the LV volumes provided by LV digital angiography (Rx) were used as gold standards. RESULTS: Whereas the GBPS(G) and GBPS(M) methods present similar low percentage variabilities, the GBPS(35%) method provided the lowest percentage variabilities for the LVEF and volume measurements (P < 0.04 and P < 0.02, respectively). The LVEF and volume provided by the 3 methods were highly correlated with the gold standard methods (r > 0.98 and r > 0.83, respectively). The LVEFs provided by the GBPS(35%) and GBPS(M) methods are similar and higher than those of the GBPS(G) method and planar(LAO) method, respectively (P < 0.0001). For the LVEF, there is no correlation between the average and paired absolute difference for the 3 GBPS methods against the planar(LAO) method, and the limits of agreement are relatively large. LV volumes are lower when calculated with the GBPS(M), GBPS(G), and Rx methods (P < 0.0001). However, the GBPS(35%) and Rx methods provide LV volumes that are similar. There is no linear correlation between the average and the paired absolute difference of volumes calculated with the GBPS(G) and GBPS(35%) methods against Rx LV volumes. However, a moderate linear correlation was found with the GBPS(M) method (r = 0.6; P = 0.0001). The 95% limits of agreement between the Rx LV volumes and the 3 GBPS methods are relatively large. CONCLUSION: GBPS is a simple, highly reproducible, and accurate technique for the LVEF and volume measurement. The reported findings should be considered when comparing results of different methods (GBPS vs. planar(LAO) LVEF; GBPS vs. Rx volume) and results of different GBPS processing methods.

Electrocardiography↗

PubMed1980

[Assessment of ejection fraction and left ventricular and diastolic volume by non-invasive methods: echocardiography and isotopic technics. Comparison with angiography in 30 patients].

Three methods of measuring the ejection and the left ventricular end-diastolic volume were compared in 30 consecutive patients (all adults, 3 normal, 3 congestive cardiomyopathy, 6 mixed aortic valve disease, 9 pure aortic stenosis and 9 pure aortic incompetence). The haemodynamic and angiographical data was compared to the results of M-mode echocardiography and gammaangiocardiography. The global results of the ejection fractions were compared: angiography gave the lowest values (0,58 +/- 18). The non-invasive methods gave very similar results (0,67 +/- 15 for the echo and gammaangio). A better correlation was obtained in the group with pure aortic incompetence; the results in pure aortic stenosis were not reliable. The global results of end-diastolic volume showed constant underestimation by the non-invasive methods compared to angiography. The choice of method in each technique may influence the results obtained; each laboratory should determine its normal values; results should not be accepted without a critical assessment. Standardisation of techniques would be desirable.

Adult↗

PubMed1993

Prognostic significance of serial changes in left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with congestive heart failure. The V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group.

BACKGROUND: In congestive heart failure patients, a single measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) provides important prognostic information. The importance, if any, of improvement or worsening in serial LVEF has not been defined. The Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Vasodilator-Heart Failure Trials (V-HeFT) data base was analyzed to determine the prognostic importance of LVEF changes. METHODS AND RESULTS: The data bases for V-HeFT I (n = 642) and V-HeFT II (n = 804) were analyzed. All patients had heart failure with documented exercise intolerance and abnormal LVEF or cardiac dilatation by chest x-ray or echocardiography. Radionuclide LVEF was obtained at baseline, within 6 months, and at least yearly after randomization to treatment. Cumulative survival subsequent to LVEF follow-up measurements was calculated for strata defined by LVEF change from baseline. In V-HeFT I, patients treated with hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate (H-I) experienced a significant (p < 0.001) increase in LVEF and a survival advantage over those treated with placebo and prazosin. In V-HeFT II, both treatment groups showed significant improvements in LVEF, with the increase with H-I greater than that with enalapril, and enalapril provided a significant survival advantage over H-I. Change (> 5) in LVEF from baseline at 6 months (V-HeFT I) and 1 year (V-HeFT II) were the strongest predictors of mortality among the serial measurements and were significant after adjustment for therapy and baseline LVEF. Baseline clinical variables were not helpful in predicting the patients who would experience an improvement in LVEF. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with heart failure, serial measurements of LVEF provide additional important prognostic information. Vasodilator therapy with H-I is associated with an improvement in LVEF and prognosis. Vasodilator therapy with enalapril improves LVEF less than H-I but provides an additional survival benefit.

Drug Therapy, Combination↗

PubMed2006

Prognostic significance of hemoglobin level in patients with congestive heart failure and normal ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown low hemoglobin (Hb) to have an adverse effect on survival in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF); but its effect on survival in patients with CHF and normal EF is not known. HYPOTHESIS: This study sought to determine whether low Hb has an effect on survival in patients with both CHF and normal EF. METHODS: Detailed chart reviews were performed by medical residents on 2,246 patients (48% with normal EF) with a discharge diagnosis of CHF in a large tertiary care hospital from 1990 to 1999. The CHF diagnosis was validated using the Framingham criteria. Mortality data were obtained from the National Death Index. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. RESULTS: By Kaplan-Meier analysis, low Hb (< 12 gm/dl) compared with normal hemoglobin was associated with a lower 5-year survival in patients with CHF and both normal (38 vs. 50%, p = 0.0008) and reduced (35 vs. 48%, p = 0.0009) EF. Using the Cox regression model, low Hb was an independent predictor of mortality after adjusting for age, gender, renal dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and EF in both groups of patients. CONCLUSION: Low Hb has an independent adverse effect on survival in patients with CHF and both normal and reduced EF in both groups of patients.

Aged↗

PubMed1985

Left ventricular volume and ejection fraction response to exercise in chronic congestive heart failure: difference between dilated cardiomyopathy and previous myocardial infarction.

To determine if cause influences the left ventricular (LV) volume and ejection fraction (EF) response to exercise, 24 patients with chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) (13 dilated cardiomyopathy [DC], CHF-DC group; 11 previous myocardial infarction [MI], CHF-MI group) and 6 age-matched control subjects underwent simultaneous hemodynamic monitoring and radionuclide ventriculography during semiupright bicycle exercise. Both CHF groups had similar hemodynamic values, LV volumes and EF at rest. Exercise hemodynamics were also similar, but LV volume and EF responses to exercise were different. In the CHF-DC group LV end-diastolic volume increased by 15% during exercise, significantly less (p less than 0.01) than the 44% increase in CHF-MI group. During exercise, EF increased in CHF-DC group, but did not change in CHF-MI group because of a larger increase in end-systolic volume. The slope of mean pulmonary wedge pressure-LV end-diastolic volume relation was steeper in CHF-DC group than in CHF-MI group (p less than 0.01). The study suggests that LV volume and EF response to exercise in patients with CHF depends on the origin of the CHF.

Cardiac Output↗

PubMed1986

Variable spectrum and prognostic implications of left and right ventricular ejection fractions in patients with and without clinical heart failure after acute myocardial infarction.

To determine the spectrum and prognostic implications of left and right ventricular (LV and RV) ejection fractions (EFs) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), radionuclide ventriculography was performed in 114 consecutive patients, admitted without (Killip class I, 78 patients) or with (killip class II, 36 patients) clinical signs of pulmonary congestion within 24 hours of onset of symptoms of a transmural AMI. Mean LVEF was significantly lower in patients in Killip class II than in those in class I (0.32 +/- 0.11 vs 0.46 +/- 0.15, p less than 0.001) and in patients with anterior than inferior AMI (0.34 +/- 0.11 vs 0.52 +/- 0.14, p less than 0.001). Of the 36 patients with a severely depressed (0.30 or less) LVEF, 15 (42%) were in Killip class I. Mean RVEF did not differ significantly between Killip class I and II patients (0.42 +/- 0.11 vs 0.40 +/- 0.12, difference not significant) but was significantly lower in patients with inferior than anterior AMI (0.38 +/- 0.09 vs 0.44 +/- 0.11, p = 0.005). In patients with inferior AMI, a depressed RVEF (0.38 or less) was associated with a normal LVEF in 30% and a depressed LVEF in 20%, whereas in those with anterior AMI, a depressed RVEF, observed in 25% of patients, occurred only in association with a depressed LVEF.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗

PubMed1986

Prognostic value of electrocardiographic exercise testing and noninvasive assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction soon after acute myocardial infarction.

To determine the relative value of clinical findings, results of low-level treadmill electrocardiographic (ECG) exercise testing and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) for predicting cardiac events in the year after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), 72 patients who had had an uncomplicated AMI were studied with either radionuclide angiography or 2-dimensional echocardiography to assess LVEF and a low-level treadmill exercise test before hospital discharge. All patients were followed for 1 year. Nineteen patients (26%) had at least 1 cardiac event: coronary artery bypass grafting (11 patients), recurrent AMI (6 patients) or cardiac death (6 patients). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that total cardiac events were predicted by exercise ECG ST-segment depression or angina, prior AMI, ventricular ectopic activity during exercise and digoxin therapy (cumulative r = 0.58, p less than 0.001). Coronary artery bypass grafting was predicted by exercise ECG ST-segment depression or angina (r = 0.29, p = 0.01). Recurrent AMI was predicted by exercise ECG ST-segment depression or angina, prior AMI and ventricular ectopic activity during exercise (cumulative r = 0.49, p less than 0.001). Cardiac death was predicted by an LVEF of 40% or less (r = 0.38, p = 0.01). The presence of both an LVEF of 40% or less and ECG ST-segment depression on treadmill exercise testing defined a subgroup of patients with a high incidence of early cardiac death (33%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed2000

Contrast harmonic color Doppler left ventriculography: machine-interpreted left ventricular ejection fraction compared with equilibrium-gated radionuclide ventriculography.

BACKGROUND: Multi-gated acquisition (equilibrium-gated radionuclide ventriculography) (MUGA) is considered the gold standard for measuring left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) because it is accurate, machine interpreted, and reproducible. Echocardiographic LVEF measurements are subject to variability in image acquisition and interpretation and to the limitations of 2-dimensional (2D) versus 3-dimensional imaging. GOAL: The shortcomings of traditional echocardiography may be addressed by combining multiplane 2D harmonic imaging, echocardiographic contrast, color Doppler ultrasonography, and digital image processing to create a new imaging modality: contrast harmonic color Doppler left ventriculography. METHODS: We compared the accuracy of a new method for measuring LVEF that allows for machine interpretation and uses contrast-enhanced intermittent harmonic color Doppler ultrasonography (CHCD). Quantitative LVEF measurements by hand-traced harmonic 2D echocardiography, contrast-enhanced harmonic 2D echocardiography, CHCD, and machine-interpreted CHCD were compared with MUGA in 35 patients. RESULTS: Contrast-enhanced intermittent harmonic color Doppler provided images with vivid endocardial definition in all patients, but hand-traced harmonic 2D echocardiography and contrast-enhanced harmonic 2D echocardiography had inadequate images in 9% of patients. The MUGA LVEF range was 0. 09 to 0.70. All echocardiographic methods showed excellent correlation with the MUGA LVEF (R (2) > 0.96), but the CHCD method had the best limits of agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced intermittent harmonic color Doppler LVEF correlates with MUGA at least as well as traditional noncontrasted echocardiography, but it provides diagnostic images in a greater proportion of patients. The CHCD images have vivid endocardial delineation and can be machine interpreted.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with normal and distorted left ventricular shape by three-dimensional echocardiographic methods: a comparison with radionuclide angiography.

BACKGROUND: Serial evaluation of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) is important for the management and follow-up of cardiac patients. Our aim was to compare LVEF calculated from two three-dimensional echocardiographic (3DE) methods with multigated radionuclide angiography (RNA), in patients with normal and abnormally shaped ventricles. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-one consecutive patients referred for RNA underwent precordial rotational 3DE acquisition of 90 cut-planes. From the volumetric data set, LVEF was calculated by (a) Simpson's rule (3DS) through manual endocardial tracing of LV short-axis series at 3 mm slice distance and (b) apical biplane modified Simpson's method ( MS) in 29 patients by manual endocardial tracing of the apical four-chamber view and its computer-derived orthogonal view. Patients included three groups: A, 17 patients with LV segmental wall motion abnormalities; B, 13 patients with LV global hypokinesis; and C, 11 patients with normal LV wall motion. For all the 41 patients, there was excellent correlation, close limits of agreement, and nonsignificant difference between 3DS and RNA for LVEF calculation (r = 0.99, [-6.7, +6.9] and p = 0.9), respectively. For the 29 patients, excellent correlation and nonsignificant differences between LVEF calculated by both 3DS and BMS and values obtained by RNA were found (r = 0.99 and 0.97, p = 0.7 and p = 0.5, respectively). In addition, no significant difference existed between values of LVEF obtained from RNA, 3DS, and BMS by the analysis of variance (p = 0.6). The limits of agreement tended to be closer between 3DS and RNA (-6.8, +7.2) than between BMS and RNA (-8.3, +9.7). The intraobserver and inter-observer variability of RNA, 3DS, and BMS for calculating LVEF(%) were (0.8, 1.5), (1.3, 1.8), and (1.6, 2.6), respectively. There were closer limits of agreement between 3DS and RNA for LVEF calculation in A, B, and C patient subgroups [(-3.5, +5), (-8.4, +5.6), and (-7.8, +8.6)] than that between BMS and RNA [(-8.1, +10.7), (-11.9, +9.3), and (-9.1, +11.3)], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference existed between RNA, 3DS, and BMS for LVEF calculation. 3DS has better correlation and closer limits of agreement than BMS with RNA for LVEF calculation, particularly in patients with segmental wall motion abnormalities and global hypokinesis. 3DS has a comparable observer variability with RNA. Therefore the use of 3DS for serial accurate LVEF calculation in cardiac patients is recommended.

Adult↗

PubMed1979

Probe radiocardiography: validation of a technique to routinely determine left ventricular ejection fraction.

We investigated the probability of obtaining a valid radiocardiogram with the first commercially available cardiac probe and a peripheral injection of the radiopharmaceutical. Measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were obtained in a series of 15 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Probe LVEF determinations using central, peripheral and rapid sequential injections correlated well with each other and with ventriculography (r = .88--.98). By documenting its accuracy and precision, this study confirms the validity of a new technique for measuring LVEF.

Cardiac Catheterization↗

PubMed2005

Repeatability of left ventricular ejection fraction and volume measurement for 99mTc-tetrofosmin gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).

OBJECTIVES: This study was carried out to assess the repeatability of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and volume values obtained using Cedars-Sinai quantitative gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (QGS) software and relatively low doses of 400-600 MBq of 99mTc-tetrofosmin. METHODS: Repeatability was assessed in a group of 75 patients, with both normal and reduced EF, who underwent repeat 99mTc-tetrofosmin gated SPECT studies and showed no clinical change in cardiac status. Gated SPECT data were acquired 1 h after injection at rest of 400-600 MBq of 99mTc-tetrofosmin. The standard patient dose was 400 MBq; however, some patients with a weight of >90 kg were given increased doses up to a maximum of 600 MBq. RESULTS: There was good correlation of EF and volumes between the first and repeat measurements, and no significant difference between the mean EF and volumes for both the initial and repeat measurements. Background-corrected counts in the left ventricle were calculated and patients were divided into two groups: one with low counts and one with high counts. The mean difference in EF between the first and repeat measurements was significantly higher for patients in the low count group compared with those in the high count group, but there was no significant change in volume. Similarly, the mean sequential difference in EF was significantly higher for patients with normal EF, but there was no significant difference in volume. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that EF measured using 99mTc-tetrofosmin gated SPECT is repeatable, particularly for patients with low EF, provided that adequate left ventricular counts are obtained. This will require doses greater than 400 MBq in larger patients. Ventricular volumes calculated using QGS may not be sufficiently repeatable for clinical use.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1994

Relationship between exercise tolerance, hemodynamics at rest and during exercise and ejection fraction, and their prognostic relevance in asymptomatic postinfarction patients.

In 309 postmyocardial infarction patients (age 40 +/- 7.7 years) without persistent ischemia there is only a weak correlation between ejection fraction (EF) and exercise tolerance (r = 0.45, p < 0.01), and between EF and maximum cardiac output (CO; r = 0.41, p < 0.01) and maximum pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP; r = -0.32, p < 0.001). The same was true for exercise tolerance and maximum PCWP (r = -0.53, p < 0.001). A big scattering of individual values could be observed. Although we found a high positive correlation between maximum CO and exercise tolerance (r = 0.80, p < 0.001), in individual cases a low CO could be related to high exercise tolerance and vice versa. In the multivariate analysis, only the heart volume/kg body weight and maximum PCWP could be shown to be of independent prognostic importance for survival and/or mortality in the following years (chi 2 = 5.9, p < 0.015 and chi 2 = 7.2, p < 0.007, respectively).

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Reduced ejection fraction after myocardial infarction: is it sufficient to justify implantation of a defibrillator?

BACKGROUND: Improved survival after prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) after myocardial infarction (MI) has been demonstrated in patients who experienced remote MIs in the 1990s. The absolute survival benefit conferred by this recommended strategy must be related to the current risk of arrhythmic death, which is evolving. This study evaluates the mortality rate in survivors of MI with impaired left ventricular function and its relation to pre-hospital discharge baseline characteristics. METHODS: The clinical records of patients who had sustained an acute MI between 1999 and 2000 and had been discharged from the hospital with an EF of < or = 40% were included. Baseline characteristics, drug prescriptions, and invasive procedures were recorded. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a primary end point of total mortality. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five patients were included. During a median follow-up period of 30 months (interquartile range, 22 to 36 months) 18 patients died. The 1-year and 2-year mortality rates were 6.7% and 8.6%, respectively. Variables reflecting coronary artery disease and its management (ie, prior MI, acute reperfusion, and complete revascularization) had a greater impact on mortality than variables reflecting mechanical dysfunction (ie, EF and Killip class). CONCLUSIONS: The mortality rate among survivors of MIs with reduced EF was substantially lower than that reported in the 1990s. The strong decrease in the arrhythmic risk implies a proportional increase in the number of patients needed to treat with a prophylactic defibrillator to prevent one adverse event. The risk of an event may even be sufficiently low to limit the detectable benefit of defibrillators in patients with the prognostic features identified in our study. This argues for additional risk stratification prior to the prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Development and application of normal limits for left ventricular ejection fraction and volume measurements from 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion gates SPECT.

UNLABELLED: Gated SPECT is a reproducible method for assessing left ventricular volume (LVV) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging studies. LVV and LVEF measurements by this approach correlate well with those obtained from other cardiovascular imaging techniques. Nevertheless, the lack of criteria for abnormal test findings has limited the potential clinical application of this new imaging technique. METHODS: Gated SPECT measurements were evaluated for 214 patients with a low Bayesian likelihood (< 10%) of coronary artery disease (CAD) before performance of 99mTc-sestamibi stress-rest myocardial perfusion SPECT. The patients were grouped into normotensive patients (n = 98), hypertensive patients without left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (n = 80), and hypertensive patients with LVH on resting electrocardiography (n = 36). Gated SPECT measurements for left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) index, left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) index, and LVEF were obtained according to a published method, using a modified Simpson's rule technique. RESULTS: Similar results were obtained for mean LVV and LVEF measurements between normotensive patients and hypertensive patients without LVH. Hence, these groups were combined (as group 1). By contrast, hypertensive patients with LVH (group 2), had significantly lower LVEF values (P = 0.01) and higher mean LVESV index values than normotensive patients (P = 0.03). Sex differences were marked: women had significantly higher mean resting LVEF values than men (P < 0.0001) and significantly lower mean resting LVEDV index values (P < 0.0001). A significant relationship was seen between LVEDV index and LVEF (r = -0.60; P < 0.0001) and between LVEDV index and heart rate (r = -0.26; P < 0.001). The normal limits were LVEF > or = 41% in men and > or = 49% in women, LVEDV index < or = 76 mL/m2 in men and < or = 57 mL/m2 in women, and LVESV index < or 38 mL/m2 in men and < or =26 mL/m2 in women. Among hypertensive patients, 22% with LVH had an abnormally low LVEF and 19% had an increased LVEDV index according to these test criteria. By contrast, no hypertensive patients without LVH had an abnormally low LVEF, and only 6% had volume abnormalities. CONCLUSION: Using a cohort of low-likelihood patients, we generated sex-specific normal limits for LVV and LVEF for myocardial perfusion gated SPECT. Application of these findings resulted in the detection of occult left ventricular dysfunction in approximately one fifth of hypertensive patients for whom concomitant LVH was found through resting electrocardiography. These normal limits can now be evaluated prospectively for their potential clinical value.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed1995

Effect of low left ventricular ejection fractions on the outcome of primary coronary by-pass grafting in end-stage coronary artery disease.

Advanced ischemic heart disease (HID) with very low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), pulmonary hypertension (PHT) with or/without left ventricular aneurysm (LVA) are criteria for defining end-stage coronary artery disease (ESCAD). Coronary artery by-pass grafting is often denied to these patients. Between January 1990 and December 1993, 91 patients with ESCAD, significant 2 or 3-vessel disease (stenosis > or = 70%) and LVEF < or = 25% underwent primary CABG at our institutions. The mean age was 62.5 +/- 8.0 years (41-81), 89% were men. Eighty-one patients were in preoperative NYHA (New York Heart Association) functional class 3 and 4. Mean LVEF was 21.3 +/- 3.8% (10-25). Mitral regurgitation (MR) was present in 39/91 (43%). The systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) was 33.2 +/- 17.1 mmHg (11-75) and the wedge pressure was 19.0 +/- 10.8 mmHg (5-47). Twenty-two patients had significant PHT with a systolic PAP > or = 40 mmHg. The overall perioperative mortality was 14.3% (13/91). Low postoperative cardiac output occurred in 33 patients, requiring intraaortic balloon support in 13. Gastrointestinal complications occurred in 6 patients and neurological events in one. Fifteen patients had additional left ventricular aneurysm repair. There was a good correlation between LVEF and PAP (r = 0.782). Surprisingly, in a subset of patients with preoperative PHT and LVEF < or = 25% the mortality rate was only 4.6% (1/22). Other perioperative complications did not differ.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗