SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Guidelines”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 991 records · Page 55Linked to original sources

PubMed1998

Cancer screening guideline preference surveys: physicians' perceptions of the American Cancer Society.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to assess cancer screening guideline preference by Tennessee internists and family physicians. DESIGN: A one-page, 14-item survey was mailed to 580 internists and family physicians followed by a reminder postcard and a second survey within six weeks of the original mailing. The survey addressed physician practice characteristics, specific preferred cancer screening guidelines used, and self-evaluation of cancer screening and detection practices compared with the practice of coronary artery disease risk and prevention, depression, and obesity/adult-onset diabetes mellitus. SETTING: Internal medicine and family physicians in Tennessee. RESULTS: The overall survey response rate was 57% (N = 300). Of respondents, 83.4% were male and 16.6% were female. Eighty-three percent were board-certified, 30% had subspecialty training, and 62% practiced in a solo practice or a single-specialty group. There were few differences in guideline preference between generalists and subspecialists. Approximately 52% of respondents cited American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines, 1.7% used US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines, 34% cited a compilation of various guidelines, and 10% used no guidelines. More physicians rated their treatment of depression (22.9%) or obesity/diabetes mellitus (22.0%) as poor or needing improvement than rated their screening of cancer (16.3%) and coronary artery disease (12.5%) as poor or needing improvement. Survey respondents suggested that the ACS could be most effective in lobbying against tobacco and in providing patient education pamphlets. CONCLUSIONS: Most physicians report using ACS screening guidelines, rate their cancer screening practices as good or very good, and recommend that the ACS lobby against tobacco and provide patient pamphlets. This study reflects physician preference of various cancer screening guidelines. Further research is needed to determine factors influencing physician preferred guideline use as well as actual practices.

American Cancer Society↗

PubMed1998

[Possibilities and limits of guidelines in medicine].

Clinical practice guidelines can be used to achieve optimal utilization of scarce resources for the medical management of defined patient groups. However, this does not mean that the total amount of resources allocated to these patient groups will be reduced automatically. Examples of different health economic consequences for guideline implementation will be discussed, especially with regards to the cost-effectiveness to therapy and to the total health care budget. The procedural steps for developing evidence-based practice guidelines are described and the cost for their development is estimated. For Germany, the amount of this cost is about 400,000 to 500,000 DM per practice guideline. The development of evidence-based guidelines without accounting for cost-effectiveness of therapy is not reasonable as cost-effectiveness is implied in the definition of guideline objectives. Practice guidelines that are not taking into consideration health economic data may diminish the cost-benefit relation of therapy. Quality criteria of sound evidence-based guidelines are introduced. Evidence-based guidelines that are developed in cooperation with recognized clinical experts attain wide acceptance among physicians. Sound evidence-based guidelines comprising cost-benefit relations of therapy can be the core of an internal health care reform.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

PubMed1999

Incorporating economic analysis in evidence-based guidelines for mental health: the profile approach.

BACKGROUND: Many western health systems are currently developing the role of clinical guidelines to promote effective and efficient health care. However, introducing economic data into guideline methodology designed to assess the effectiveness of interventions raises some methodological issues. These include providing valid and generalizable cost estimates, the weight placed upon cost "evidence" and presenting cost-effectiveness information in a way that is helpful to clinicians. AIM OF THE STUDY: To explore a framework for including economic concepts in the development of a series of primary care guidelines, two of which address mental health conditions. METHODS: A profile approach, setting out best available evidence about the attributes of treatment choices (effectiveness, tolerability, safety, health service delivery, quality of life, resource use and cost), was used to help clinicians to derive treatment recommendations in a manner consistent with both the clinical decision-making process and social objectives. RESULTS: Clinicians involved in guideline development responded well to the process. Although there was often considerable debate about the meaning and importance of different aspects of evidence about treatment, in none of the guideline groups was there failure to agree treatment recommendations. DISCUSSION: The profile approach may be particularly useful in the field of mental health where disease processes may often feature very disparate effects, over long periods of time and impacting upon a broad circle of relatives, carers and agencies in addition to the patients themselves. CONCLUSION: A method has been applied in a series of primary care guidelines, which appears to enable clinicians to consider the issue of resource use alongside the various clinical attributes associated with treatment decisions. The basis of this work is the belief that guidance presenting physical measures describing effectiveness, adverse events, safety, compliance and quality of life, alongside resource consequences, is most likely to appropriately inform doctor-patient interactions. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE PROVISON AND USE: This research may provide a useful platform for other groups considering how to introduce cost-effectiveness concepts into guideline development groups. Whether guidelines change clinical behaviour remains a research question, and the subject of forthcoming trials. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICY FORMULATION: It is important that government agencies realize that guideline development is a health policy tool with prescribed methods to produce valid guidelines. Attempts to tamper with the methodology for cost-containment purposes or other political reasons are likely to discredit a useful mechanism for improving the scientific basis of health care provision. IMPLICATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH: There are a number of limitations to completed work: for example it has a primary care focus and addresses fairly narrowly defined conditions. Work is ongoing to extend the scope to broader disease areas and to secondary care.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2006

Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 11. Incorporating considerations of cost-effectiveness, affordability and resource implications.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO), like many other organisations around the world, has recognised the need to use more rigorous processes to ensure that health care recommendations are informed by the best available research evidence. This is the 11th of a series of 16 reviews that have been prepared as background for advice from the WHO Advisory Committee on Health Research to WHO on how to achieve this. OBJECTIVES: We reviewed the literature on incorporating considerations of cost-effectiveness, affordability and resource implications in guidelines and recommendations. METHODS: We searched PubMed and three databases of methodological studies for existing systematic reviews and relevant methodological research. We did not conduct systematic reviews ourselves. Our conclusions are based on the available evidence, consideration of what WHO and other organisations are doing and logical arguments. KEY QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS: When is it important to incorporate cost-effectiveness, resource implications and affordability considerations in WHO guidelines (which topics)? For cost-effectiveness:The need for cost/effectiveness information should be dictated by the specific question, of which several may be addressed in a single guideline. It is proposed that the indications for undertaking a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) could be a starting point for determining which recommendation(s) in the guideline would benefit from such analysis. For resource implications/affordability:The resource implications of each individual recommendation need to be considered when implementation issues are being discussed. How can cost-effectiveness, resource implications and affordability be explicitly taken into account in WHO guidelines? For cost-effectiveness: composite function If data are available, the ideal time to consider cost-effectiveness is during the evidence gathering and synthesizing stage. However, because of the inconsistent availability of CEAs and the procedural difficulty associated with adjusting results from different CEAs to make them comparable, it is also possible for cost-effectiveness to be considered during the stage of developing recommendations. composite function Depending on the quantity and quality and relevance of the data available, such data can be considered in a qualitative way or in a quantitative way, ranging from a listing of the costs to a modelling exercise. At the very least, a qualitative approach like a commentary outlining the economic issues that need to be considered is necessary. If a quantitative approach is to be used, the full model should be transparent and comprehensive. For resource implications/affordability: composite function Resource implications, including health system changes, for each recommendation in a WHO guideline should be explored. At the minimum, a qualitative description that can serve as a gross indicator of the amount of resources needed, relative to current practice, should be provided. How does one provide guidance in contextualizing guideline recommendations at the country level based on considerations of cost-effectiveness, resource implications and affordability? All models should be made available and ideally are designed to allow for analysts to make changes in key parameters and reapply results in their own country. In the global guidelines, scenarios and extensive sensitivity/uncertainty analysis can be applied.Resource implications for WHO. From the above, it is clear that guidelines development groups will need a health economist. There is need to ensure that this is included in the budget for guidelines and that there is in-house support for this as well.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1986

Effectiveness of medical necessity guidelines in reducing cost of oxygen therapy.

Concern for the rising costs of respiratory therapy in patient care caused a third party payor to implement reimbursement guidelines for inhospital delivery of oxygen (O2) therapy. While these guidelines are physiologically appropriate, their effectiveness in cost reduction has not been documented. To determine the effect of similar guidelines on the cost of O2 therapy, we prospectively studied 77 noncritically ill patients for whom physicians ordered O2. If pretreatment arterial blood gas determinations had not been ordered, ear oximetry was performed. The cost of O2 therapy to each patient, as based on total patient charges for O2, appliances, delivery, and assessment of oxygenation throughout hospitalization, was computed in three ways: Cost A, actual charges for O2 therapy initiated by physician order; Cost B, projected charges for O2 therapy using physiologic guidelines alone (PaO2 less than 60 mm Hg or SaO2 less than 90 percent); and Cost C, projected charges for O2 therapy using combined physiologic and clinical guidelines (PaO2 less than 60 mm Hg, SaO2 less than 90 percent or clinical record reasonably indicating hypoxemia). Of the 77 patients, 23 (30 percent) met the physiologic guidelines and 48 (62 percent) met the combined physiologic and clinical guidelines. The cost (total patient charges) of O2 therapy can be reduced through implementation of medical necessity guidelines, but physiologic guidelines alone appear more cost effective than combined physiologic and clinical guidelines.

Blood Gas Analysis↗

PubMed2000

[Israeli family physicians' attitudes to clinical guidelines for treatment of diabetes].

Clinical guidelines are systematically developed statements designed to help practitioners and patients make decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical states. Attitudes of family physicians to clinical guidelines for treating diabetes and guidelines in general were evaluated from anonymous questionnaires answered by physicians participating in continuous medical education throughout the country (May-June 1998). The questionnaire dealt with attitudes to the recently published specific guidelines for treating the diabetic patient and overall perception of the efficacy of clinical guidelines. 293 family physicians, aged 40.2 +/- 7.0 responded (83%). 93.5% appreciated the guidelines and thought them applicable. Most (83.7%) reported the guidelines to be of help in their daily work; 31.4% said they were oversimplified; a quarter said they aimed mainly at containing costs. Most respondents preferred written guidelines of up to 5 pages. In view of our results, attention can now be turned to developing ways to implement the guidelines. To improve adherence, they need to be short and the rate of publication of new clinical guidelines should be slowed.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Development and evaluation of online evidence based guideline bank system.

The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate the online evidence-based nursing practice guideline bank system to support the best evidence-based decision in the clinical and community practice settings. The main homepage consisted of seven modules for introduction of site, EBN, guideline bank, guideline development, guideline review, related sites, and community. The major contents in the guidelines were purpose, developer, intended audience, method of development, target population, testing, knowledge components, and evaluation. Electronic versions of the guidelines were displayed by XML, PDF, and PDA versions. The system usability were evaluated by general users, guideline developers, and guideline reviewers on the web and the results showed high scores of satisfaction. This online evidence-based guideline bank system could support nurses' best and cost-effective clinical decision using the sharable standardized guidelines with education module of evidence based nursing.

Databases as Topic↗

PubMed1999

Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

CONTEXT: Despite wide promulgation, clinical practice guidelines have had limited effect on changing physician behavior. Little is known about the process and factors involved in changing physician practices in response to guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To review barriers to physician adherence to clinical practice guidelines. DATA SOURCES: We searched the MEDLINE, Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC), and HealthSTAR databases (January 1966 to January 1998); bibliographies; textbooks on health behavior or public health; and references supplied by experts to find English-language article titles that describe barriers to guideline adherence. STUDY SELECTION: Of 5658 articles initially identified, we selected 76 published studies describing at least 1 barrier to adherence to clinical practice guidelines, practice parameters, clinical policies, or national consensus statements. One investigator screened titles to identify candidate articles, then 2 investigators independently reviewed the texts to exclude articles that did not match the criteria. Differences were resolved by consensus with a third investigator. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators organized barriers to adherence into a framework according to their effect on physician knowledge, attitudes, or behavior. This organization was validated by 3 additional investigators. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 76 articles included 120 different surveys investigating 293 potential barriers to physician guideline adherence, including awareness (n = 46), familiarity(n = 31), agreement (n = 33), self-efficacy (n = 19), outcome expectancy (n = 8), ability to overcome the inertia of previous practice (n = 14), and absence of external barriers to perform recommendations (n = 34). The majority of surveys (70 [58%] of 120) examined only 1 type of barrier. CONCLUSIONS: Studies on improving physician guideline adherence may not be generalizable, since barriers in one setting may not be present in another. Our review offers a differential diagnosis for why physicians do not follow practice guidelines, as well as a rational approach toward improving guideline adherence and a framework for future research.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed2001

Soft tissue sarcoma--compliance with guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Because soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare, guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with STS were developed. Because the diagnostic management is essential for definitive treatment, adherence to these guidelines is important. METHODS: Primary STS registered by the Comprehensive Cancer Center North-Netherlands from January 1989 to January 1996 were analyzed retrospectively with regard to adherence to the diagnostic guidelines. Urogenital, gastrointestinal STS, and Kaposi sarcomas were excluded. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-one STS patients were analyzed. In the specialized center, 69% of patients were age < 60 years, whereas, in district hospitals, 63% of patients were age > 60 years. With increased age, referral to the center declined in a linear fashion. For all guidelines, adherence was significantly better in the center. In district hospitals, patient volume had no significant influence on compliance with the guidelines, except for the management of patients with STS > or = 3 cm. In district hospitals, where fewer than 15 patients were treated in the 7-year period, significantly more often, an inadequate biopsy or even no biopsy procedure was performed prior to resection. CONCLUSIONS: In many aspects of the diagnostic process of STS, existing guidelines were not followed, especially in community hospitals. Adherence to all individual guidelines was significantly better in the specialized center. To improve compliance with future STS guidelines, appropriate guideline development, dissemination, and implementation programs should be developed. Concentration of patients with STS in a limited number of hospitals and intensified collaboration with specialized centers seem advisable. Special attention should be paid to older patients, who significantly more often were not referred to a specialized center.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Guidelines in professions allied to medicine.

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines aim to reduce inappropriate variations in practice and to promote the delivery of evidence-based health care. OBJECTIVES: To identify and assess the effects of studies of the introduction of clinical practice guidelines in nursing (including health visiting), midwifery and other professions allied to medicine. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group specialised register, MEDLINE (1975 to 1996), EMBASE, Cinahl and Sigle to 1996, the NHS Economic Evaluations Database (1994 to 1996), DHSS-Data (1983 to 1996), the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (1994 to 1996) and reference lists of articles. We also hand searched the journal Quality in Health Care, made personal contact with content experts and contacted libraries identified by an expert panel. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials, controlled before-and-after studies and interrupted time series analyses of the introduction of interventions comparing 1. Clinical guidelines plus dissemination and/or implementation strategies versus no guidelines; 2. Guidelines plus dissemination and/or implementation strategies versus guidelines plus alternative dissemination and/or implementation strategies; and 3. (post hoc) Guidelines used by professions allied to medicine versus standard physician care. The participants were nurses, midwives and other professions allied to medicine. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. MAIN RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included involving more than 467 health care professionals. The reporting of study methods was inadequate for all studies. In all but one study, nurses were the targeted professional group; one study was aimed solely at dieticians. The various behaviours targeted included the management of hypertension, low back pain and hyperlipidaemia. Nine studies were identified for comparison 1. Three out of five studies observed improvements in at least some processes of care and six out of eight studies observed improvements in outcomes of care. Only one study included a formal economic evaluation, with equivocal findings. Three studies were identified for comparison 2 but it was difficult to draw firm conclusions because of poor methods. Six studies were identified for comparison 3 (post hoc). These studies generally supported the hypothesis that there was no difference between care given by nurses using clinical guidelines and standard physician care. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence that guideline-driven care is effective in changing the process and outcome of care provided by professions allied to medicine. However, caution is needed in generalising findings to other professions and settings.

Allied Health Personnel↗

PubMed2004

Clinician awareness of adherence to hypertension guidelines.

PURPOSE: Little is known about how well clinicians are aware of their own adherence to clinical guidelines, an important indicator of quality. We compared clinicians' beliefs about their adherence to hypertension guidelines with data on their actual performance. METHODS: We surveyed 139 primary care clinicians at three Veterans Affairs medical centers, asking them to assess their own adherence to hypertension guidelines. We then extracted data from the centers' clinical databases on guideline-concordant medication use and blood pressure control for patients cared for by these providers during a 6-month period. Data were collected for patients with hypertension and diabetes, hypertension and coronary disease, or hypertension with neither of these comorbid conditions. RESULTS: Eighty-six clinicians (62%) completed the survey. Each clinician saw a median of 94 patients with hypertension (mean age, 65 years). Patients were treated with an average of 1.6 antihypertensive medications. Overall, clinicians overestimated the proportion of their patients who were prescribed guideline-concordant medications (75% perceived vs. 67% actual, P <0.001) and who had blood pressure levels <140/90 mm Hg on their last visit (68% perceived vs. 43% actual, P <0.001). Among individual clinicians, there were no significant correlations between perceived and actual guideline adherence (r = 0.18 for medications, r = 0.14 for blood pressure control; P > or =0.10 for both). Clinicians with relatively low actual guideline performance were most likely to overestimate their adherence to medication recommendations and blood pressure targets. CONCLUSION: Clinicians appear to overestimate their adherence to hypertension guidelines, particularly with regards to the proportion of their patients with controlled blood pressure. This limited awareness may represent a barrier to successful implementation of guidelines, and could be addressed through the use of provider profiles and point-of-service feedback to clinicians.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Do neurosurgeons subscribe to the guideline lumbosacral radicular syndrome?

BACKGROUND: This study presents a survey of the opinion of neurosurgeons on the multidisciplinary clinical guideline 'lumbosacral radicular syndrome'. The aim was to describe to what extent neurosurgeons in the Netherlands endorse the content of this guideline. The guideline was issued in 1996 by the Netherlands Institute of Quality Health Care and this is the first attempt to evaluate the implementation of this guideline. METHODS: All active neurosurgeons (n=92) in the Netherlands were invited to complete a questionnaire investigating to what extent they agree with the 26 recommendations in the guideline 'lumbosacral radicular syndrome'. The results are represented in frequencies (%) in order to express the magnitude of their consent or dissent with the recommendations. RESULTS: Overall, 75% of the neurosurgeons responded and, of these, 94% agreed (at least partially) with the content of the guideline. Of the 26 recommendations in the guideline, seven were not fully endorsed by the neurosurgeons. Three of these seven recommendations may need revision based on newly published data. CONCLUSION: This survey shows that almost all neurosurgeons subscribed (at least partially) to the multidisciplinary LRS guideline. Therefore, one important aspect of the implementation process has been fulfilled, i.e. acceptance of the content of the guideline.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Impact of gestational diabetes mellitus nutrition practice guidelines implemented by registered dietitians on pregnancy outcomes.

Nutrition practice guidelines were developed for gestational diabetes mellitus by registered dietitians from the Diabetes Care and Education and the Women's Health and Reproductive Nutrition dietetic practice groups. To validate the guidelines, a clinical trial was designed with clinic sites randomly assigned to either nutrition practice guidelines care (12 sites) or usual nutrition care (13 sites), with diabetes, obstetric, and other clinic types represented in both groups. Volunteer dietitians served as study coordinators and recruited women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus. The nutrition practice guidelines define medical nutrition therapy (MNT) for gestational diabetes and emphasize three areas-definition of MNT clinical goals with indexes to modify or advance MNT and criteria to start insulin; use of self-monitoring tools; and provision of three nutrition visits. Usual care sites provided prenatal nutrition care according to usual practice. The effect of nutrition care (sites following the nutrition care guidelines) and type of clinic site on changes in glycated hemoglobin and infant birth weight, adjusted for other covariates, were evaluated using linear regression. Differences in insulin use and other infant outcomes between treatment groups were evaluated using logistic regression. Generalized estimating equations were used to accommodate nonindependence within randomized clusters of patients within clinic sites. Data from 215 women indicated less insulin use at diabetes clinic sites in the nutrition practice guidelines groups and improved glycated hemoglobin control during the treatment period in diabetes clinics compared with obstetric or other clinics. A higher proportion of women in the usual care group had glycated hemoglobin levels that exceeded 6% at follow-up compared with women in the nutrition practice guidelines group (13.6% vs 8.1%), although not statistically significant (P=0.26). A significant clinic type and treatment group effect was found for birth weight. Nutrition practice guidelines for gestational diabetes mellitus reflected nutrition care already being provided by registered dietitians in diabetes clinics prior to this study because outcomes at these clinics were not impacted. Use of the guidelines by dietitians at obstetric and other clinics tended to improve outcomes at these sites.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

An evaluation of the use of guidelines in prehospital management of brain injury.

OBJECTIVES: The Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) Guidelines for Prehospital Management of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) are intended to standardize treatment and improve outcomes in severe TBI patients. The key guideline components focus on airway management, blood pressure support, Glasgow Coma Score assessment, and transport. The purposes of this study were to determine if providers could learn and retain the guidelines (education), assess if providers would use the guidelines in practice (implementation), and evaluate the effect of guideline implementation on patients (outcomes). METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on all trauma patients for five months. Providers were then educated on the TBI guidelines over two months, and five additional months of data were collected. A knowledge test was given before and after the course and three months later to assess education. To assess implementation, data were analyzed to determine whether providers were using the key interventions more consistently after education. The clinical courses of TBI patients before and after guideline implementation were measured to assess outcomes. RESULTS: Knowledge of TBI care improved significantly after education and remained elevated at three months (62% vs. 82% vs. 79%, p < 0.001). For the 1,044 patients seen, providers demonstrated higher rates of appropriate care, resulting in lower rates of hypoxia (2.8% vs. 1.1%, p=0.010) and hypotension (4.8% vs. 2.0%, p=0.018). Mortality was significantly decreased (34.6% vs. 17.0%, p=0.039), and rates of patients with maximum functional scores at 14 days significantly increased (Glasgow Outcome Score 44.2% vs. 66.0%, p=0.025; Rancho Los Amigos Scale 55.9% vs. 77.3%, p=0.045). CONCLUSION: Providers were able to learn and implement the BTF guidelines, and outcomes in TBI patients were significantly improved. All emergency medical services providers should be trained in these potentially lifesaving guidelines.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

What factors induce health care decision-makers to use clinical guidelines? Evidence from provincial health ministries, regional health authorities and hospitals in Canada.

This paper addresses three questions: What is the extent of clinical guideline utilization by decision-makers in provincial health ministries, regional health authorities and hospitals in Canada? Are there differences between these work settings in regard to the extent of clinical guideline utilization? What are the determinants of clinical guidelines utilization in health ministries, regional health authorities and hospitals? Based on a survey of 899 decision-makers from Canadian provincial health ministries, regional health authorities and hospitals, the results indicate that there are large differences between work settings in regard to clinical guideline utilization. Not surprisingly, work settings like hospitals rely more intensively on clinical guidelines than the other work settings (health ministries or agencies and regional health authorities). The results of the regression models indicate that cognitive factors, social factors, technological factors, organizational factors and individual attributes significantly predict the utilization of clinical practice guidelines by decision-makers. However, the results of the regression models also indicate that some factors that predict clinical guideline utilization by decision-makers in hospitals do not predict clinical guidelines utilization by decision-makers working in ministries or in regional health authorities. Therefore, these results suggest that customized interventions would be appropriate in order to efficiently increase the utilization of clinical practice guidelines in different work settings. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research.

Canada↗

PubMed2003

Guideline chaos: conflicting recommendations for preoperative cardiac assessment.

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and the American College of Physicians (ACP) have disseminated guidelines to assess preoperative cardiac risks before noncardiac surgery. The objectives of this study were to determine if these guidelines differ in preoperative recommendations for a group of patients, and whether these recommendations differ from actual provider recommendations. In this retrospective cohort study, patient characteristics and physician recommendations were abstracted from electronic medical records of consecutive patients attending a Veteran Affairs medical preoperative evaluation clinic from January 1 to April 1, 1998. Patient characteristics were used to determine what preoperative cardiac testing should have been ordered if each guideline was followed. Possible recommendations included operation without testing (OWT), noninvasive stress testing (NST), cardiac catheterization (CC), or cancel or delay surgery (OTHER). Recommendations were compared using statistical tests for agreement. Of the 138 patients identified, most underwent moderate-risk surgeries. Recommendations for preoperative testing were discordant between guidelines for 17% of patients (kappa = 0.38). Guidelines never agreed on the need for NST. Extreme differences in recommendations (i.e., one recommends OWT, the other CC) occurred in 9 patients (7%). Physicians ordered NST more often (n = 27) than either guideline. In this subgroup of patients where providers ordered a NST, the 2 guidelines significantly differed (kappa = 0.26). When applied to real patients being evaluated for surgery, ACC/AHA and ACP guidelines significantly differed in recommendations for preoperative cardiac testing. Results have implications for implementation, management, and practitioner adherence to published guidelines.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Measuring adherence to depression treatment guidelines in a VA primary care clinic.

The primary objectives of this pilot study were to develop a measure of adherence for depression practice guidelines and to assess the degree to which providers and patients adhere to guidelines in a VA primary care setting. The Depression Guideline Measure (DGM) is based on three national guidelines. The DGM was used to review medical records of 111 patients with Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) scores >or=10. Interrater reliability for 15 of 19 DGM checklist items was excellent (kappa > 0.75). There was a broad range of adherence to guideline criteria: only 13.5% of patients were contacted for follow-up within 2 weeks, while 100% of providers documented follow-up plans. Forty percent of patients saw mental health providers, and 63% were prescribed antidepressants. A secondary objective of the study was to explore the relationship between guideline adherence and changes in PHQ scores. Among 51 patients who completed follow-up PHQs, no associations were detected. The results suggest that the DGM shows promise as a reliable measure of guideline adherence and that guideline criteria are frequently not met in busy primary care clinics. More research is needed to determine the validity of the DGM and the impact of guideline adherence on depression outcomes.

Depressive Disorder↗

PubMed1998

Guidelines on euthanasia and pain alleviation: compliance and opinions of physicians.

The objectives of this study are to describe: (a) the presence of; and (b) compliance with guidelines in cases of euthanasia and intensifying the alleviation of pain and symptoms; (c) the opinions of physicians about written guidelines; and (d) the relationship between meeting the requirements for prudent practice and presence of, and compliance with guidelines for euthanasia or assisted suicide (EAS). In 1990 and 1995 interviews were held with 405 physicians (general practitioners, nursing home physicians and clinical specialists). The response rate for the 2 years was 91 and 89%, respectively. The percentage of physicians who reported the existence of EAS guidelines increased from 50% in 1990 to 59% in 1995, and the compliance with these guidelines increased from 51 to 75%, respectively. Of the physicians, 17% stated that there were written guidelines for intensifying the alleviation of pain and symptoms. With regard to meeting the requirements for prudent practice, we found mostly no differences between cases of euthanasia in which EAS guidelines were present, and cases in which there were no guidelines. However, when guidelines did exist and were actually used, it seems there was a better adherence to consultation and notification, although numbers were small. The increase since 1990 in agreement with the statement that an institution should formulate a policy with regard to euthanasia, may reflect the growing awareness of the specific role of the management, and not only the physician, in this matter.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗