SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Meta- analysis”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,009 records · Page 56Linked to original sources

PubMed2004

The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis.

Calculation of the statistical power of statistical tests is important in planning and interpreting the results of research studies, including meta-analyses. It is particularly important in moderator analyses in meta-analysis, which are often used as sensitivity analyses to rule out moderator effects but also may have low statistical power. This article describes how to compute statistical power of both fixed- and mixed-effects moderator tests in meta-analysis that are analogous to the analysis of variance and multiple regression analysis for effect sizes. It also shows how to compute power of tests for goodness of fit associated with these models. Examples from a published meta-analysis demonstrate that power of moderator tests and goodness-of-fit tests is not always high.

Humans↗

PubMed1995

Meta-analysis: overview and application to clinical nursing practice.

If nursing practice is to benefit from the abundance of nursing research being conducted, a technique is needed to synthesize and integrate the results of individual studies. Meta-analysis, a quantitative approach to literature review, is such a technique. This article provides an overview of meta-analysis. Examples of published meta-analysis studies in obstetric and neonatal nursing are discussed to illustrate the clinical significance of this technique.

Clinical Nursing Research↗

PubMed2026

Association of galectin-3 in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BackgroundSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune condition showing persistent profiling of inflammation and damage of organs and immune system. Amongst many biomarkers for such autoimmune diseases, Galectin-3 (Gal-3) a β-galactoside-binding lectin responsible for regulation, inflammation, and fibrosis of immune repsonses, has engrossed researchers for further investigations as a potential biomarker. However, correlation has been studied between circulating Galectin-3 levels and SLE but outcomes still remain inconsistent. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the association between circulating galectin-3 levels and SLE.Materials and MethodsPubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Embase databases are extensively used for literature search. The last database search was conducted on September 6, 2025. Eligible studies included case control studies reporting circulating galectin-3 levels in individuals with SLE and healthy controls. Two independent reviewers performed study selection and data extraction. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software was used for statistical analysis. Pooled effect sizes were calculated as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistics, and publication bias was evaluated using Begg's funnel plot and Egger's regression analysis.ResultsSeven eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that patients with SLE had significantly higher circulating Galectin-3 levels than healthy controls (mean difference = 8.48; 95% CI: 3.84-13.12; p < 0.0001). Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies (Tau square: 32.57, Q = 196.03; p < 0.0001, I2 = 96.93%). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the overall findings. Begg's funnel plot and Egger's regression analysis indicated no publication bias among studies. Subgroup analysis supports the results of the overall analysis.ConclusionThis meta-analysis depicts that galectin-3 may serve as a biomarker associated with SLE pathogenesis and inflammatory activity due to significantly elevated levels of circulating galectin-3 levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Humans↗

PubMed2005

Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: III. Family history, actinic damage and phenotypic factors.

A systematic meta-analysis of observational studies of melanoma and family history, actinic damage and phenotypic factors was conducted as part of a comprehensive meta-analysis of all major risk factors for melanoma. Following a systematic literature search, relative risks were extracted from 60 studies published before September 2002. Fixed and random effects models were used to obtain pooled estimates for family history (RR = 1.74, 1.41-2.14), skin type (I vs. IV: RR = 2.09, 1.67-2.58), high density of freckles (RR = 2.10, 1.80-2.45), skin colour (Fair vs. Dark: RR = 2.06, 1.68-2.52), eye colour (Blue vs. Dark: RR = 1.47, 1.28-1.69) and hair colour (Red vs. Dark: RR = 3.64, 2.56-5.37), pre-malignant and skin cancer lesions (RR = 4.28, 2.80-6.55) and actinic damage indicators (RR = 2.02, 1.24-3.29). Sub-group analysis and meta-regression were carried out to explore sources of between-study variation and bias. Sensitivity analyses investigated reliability of results and publication bias. Latitude and adjustment for phenotype were two study characteristics that significantly influenced the estimates.

Humans↗

PubMed2006

Association between PADI4 and rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Polymorphisms and haplotypes of the peptidylarginine deiminase type 4 gene (PADI4) have been reported to be associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a Japanese population. However, subsequent replication studies showed conflicting results. The aim of this study was to determine whether meta-analysis would prove the existence of the association. METHODS: PubMed was searched using the term 'PADI4' for articles from the publication of the first study to December 2005. Replication studies that tested the association between PADI4 and RA were reviewed for meta-analysis. The Breslow-Day test for homogeneity across the studies was calculated. The Mantel-Haenszel procedure was used to pool odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to evaluate the association. RESULTS: Six replication studies, one from Japan and five from Europe and North America, fulfilled the selection criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Homogeneity was confirmed across the replication studies. The common OR was 1.14 (95% CI = 1.07-1.21) for allelic distribution. The association was confirmed when only five replication studies in the European descent populations were combined (P = 0.0096, common OR = 1.10). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed a positive association between PADI4 and RA not only in the Japanese population but also in populations of European descent.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗

PubMed2002

Efficacy of the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain affects a large proportion of the population. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) was introduced more than 30 years ago as an alternative therapy to pharmacologic treatments for chronic pain. However, despite its widespread use, the efficacy of TENS is still controversial. PURPOSE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of TENS in the treatment of chronic low back pain. METHODS: The authors searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PEDro, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register up to June 1, 2000. Only randomized controlled clinical trials of TENS for the treatment of patients with a clinical diagnosis of chronic low back pain were included. Abstracts were excluded unless further data could be obtained from the authors. Two reviewers independently selected trials and extracted data using predetermined forms. DATA ANALYSIS: Heterogeneity was tested with Cochrane's Q test. A fixed effects model was used throughout for continuous variables, except where heterogeneity existed, in which case, a random effects model was used. Results are presented as weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals, where the difference between the treated and control groups was weighted by the inverse of the variance. Standardized mean differences were calculated by dividing the difference between the treated and control by the baseline variance. Standardized mean differences were used when different scales were integrated to measure the same concept. Dichotomous outcomes were analyzed with odds ratios. MAIN RESULTS: Five trials were included, with 170 subjects randomized to the placebo group receiving sham TENS and 251 subjects receiving active TENS (153 for conventional mode, 98 for acupuncture-like TENS). The schedule of treatments varied greatly between studies ranging from one treatment/day for 2 consecutive days, to three treatments/day for 4 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences between the active TENS group compared with the placebo TENS group for any outcome measures. Subgroup analysis performed on TENS application and methodologic quality did not demonstrate a significant statistical difference (P > 0.05). Remaining preplanned subgroup analysis was not conducted because of the small number of included trials and the variety of outcome measures reported. CONCLUSION: The results of the meta-analysis present no evidence to support the use or nonuse of TENS alone in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Considering the small number of studies responding to the criteria to be included in this meta-analysis, it is clear that more appropriately designed studies are needed before a final conclusion. Clinicians and researchers should consistently report the characteristics of the TENS device and the application techniques used. New trials on TENS should make use of standardized outcome measures. This meta-analysis lacked data on how TENS efficacy is affected by four important factors: type of applications, site of application, treatment duration of TENS, and optimal frequencies and intensities.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Bridging meta-analysis and the comparative method: a test of seed size effect on germination after frugivores' gut passage.

Most studies using meta-analysis try to establish relationships between traits across taxa from interspecific databases and, thus, the phylogenetic relatedness among these taxa should be taken into account to avoid pseudoreplication derived from common ancestry. This paper illustrates, with a representative example of the relationship between seed size and the effect of frugivore's gut on seed germination, that meta-analytic procedures can also be phylogenetically corrected by means of the comparative method. The conclusions obtained in the meta-analytical and phylogenetical approaches are very different. The meta-analysis revealed that the positive effects that gut passage had on seed germination increased with seed size in the case of gut passage through birds whereas decreased in the case of gut passage through non-flying mammals. However, once the phylogenetic relatedness among plant species was taken into account, the effects of gut passage on seed germination did not depend on seed size and were similar between birds and non-flying mammals. Some methodological considerations are given to improve the bridge between the meta-analysis and the comparative method.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Comparing rates of dyspepsia with Coxibs vs NSAID+PPI: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Because dyspeptic symptoms are far more prevalent than ulcer complications in users of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), economic models indicate that dyspepsia rates (not ulcer complications) are the major determinant of cost-effectiveness in treating arthritis. We performed a meta-analysis to compare rates of dyspepsia for two common therapies in high-risk patients with arthritis: cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor (Coxib) alone and combination therapy with a nonselective NSAID and a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (NSAID+PPI). METHODS: We performed a systematic review to identify trials comparing either a Coxib versus NSAID or NSAID+PPI versus NSAID in chronic arthritis. We selected studies that report incident dyspepsia, defined a priori as "epigastric pain," "dyspepsia," and "nausea." We then performed meta-analysis to compare the relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction of dyspepsia for Coxib versus NSAID and NSAID+PPI versus NSAID. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 26 studies comparing dyspepsia between Coxibs and NSAIDs revealed a 12% relative risk reduction for Coxibs with an absolute risk reduction of 3.7%. Meta-analysis of four studies comparing dyspepsia between the NSAID+PPI combination and NSAIDs alone revealed a 66% relative risk reduction for NSAID+PPI with an absolute risk reduction of 9%. Compared with the NSAID strategy, the number needed to treat to prevent dyspepsia was 27 for Coxibs and 11 for NSAID+PPI. CONCLUSION: NSAID+PPI affords greater risk reduction for dyspepsia than Coxibs when compared with the common baseline of NSAIDs. Because there are limited head-to-head data comparing Coxibs versus NSAID+PPI, these data provide the best indirect evidence that NSAID+PPI may be superior to Coxibs in minimizing incident dyspepsia.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

PubMed2006

Influence of smoking on osseointegrated implant failure: a meta-analysis.

The aim of this study was to examine the influence of smoking on osseointegrated implant failure by performing a meta-analysis. A computerized literature search using PubMed database (in English) and Japana Centra Revuo Medicina (in Japanese) was carried out to identify all relevant studies. Among 175 studies identified and chosen for detailed review, 19 were appropriate for inclusion in our meta-analysis. When smokers were compared with non-smokers, odds ratio (OR) for osseointegrated implant failure was significantly elevated (OR 2.17, 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.67-2.83). Seven studies were appropriate to examine the influence of intra-oral location (maxillary arch vs. mandibular arch) of implant failure on smoking. The OR for implant failure occurring in the maxillary arch was significantly elevated (OR 2.06, 95% CI, 1.61-2.65), whereas the OR in the mandibular arch did not demonstrate a significant increased risk associated with smoking (OR 1.32, 95% CI, 0.72-2.4). Our meta-analysis revealed a significant relationship between smoking and the risk of osseointegrated implant failure, more particularly those implants located in the maxillary arch.

Dental Arch↗

PubMed1997

A meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies of lung cancer in welders.

OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies was carried out on lung cancer risk among shipyard, mild steel, and stainless steel welders, and the role of asbestos exposure and smoking was considered. METHODS: The meta-analysis consisted of calculating combined relative risks (RR) and their variances through a logarithm transformation of published RR values and a weighing using the inverted variance of each RR. RESULTS: The literature provided 18 case-referent and 31 cohort studies. The combined RR values were 1.38 [observed 1028, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.29-1.48] for "all or unspecified welding categories", 1.30 (observed 305, 95% CI 1.14-1.48) for shipyard welders, and 1.35 (observed 173, 95% CI 1.15-1.58) for nonshipyard welders. Similar combined RR values (RR) were observed for mild steel welders (combined RR 1.50, observed 137, 95% CI 1.18-1.91) and stainless steel welders (combined RR 1.50 observed 114, 95% CI 1.10-2.05). No significant heterogeneity was discerned between studies of any welding or study design category. A marked healthy worker effect may also lead to an underestimation of the standardized mortality ratio for lung cancer among stainless steel welders. Furthermore, welders of any category are likely to be exposed to asbestos. Welders also seem to smoke more than the general male population, and therefore the hypothesis of tobacco overconsumption among welders could not be discarded. CONCLUSIONS: A 30-40% increase in the RR of lung cancer among welders cannot be explained by hexavalent chromium and nickel exposure among stainless steel welders. The combination of the carcinogenic effects of asbestos exposure and smoking may account for part of the lung cancer excess observed.

Asbestos↗

PubMed2005

A note on generalized Genome Scan Meta-Analysis statistics.

BACKGROUND: Wise et al. introduced a rank-based statistical technique for meta-analysis of genome scans, the Genome Scan Meta-Analysis (GSMA) method. Levinson et al. recently described two generalizations of the GSMA statistic: (i) a weighted version of the GSMA statistic, so that different studies could be ascribed different weights for analysis; and (ii) an order statistic approach, reflecting the fact that a GSMA statistic can be computed for each chromosomal region or bin width across the various genome scan studies. RESULTS: We provide an Edgeworth approximation to the null distribution of the weighted GSMA statistic, and, we examine the limiting distribution of the GSMA statistics under the order statistic formulation, and quantify the relevance of the pairwise correlations of the GSMA statistics across different bins on this limiting distribution. We also remark on aggregate criteria and multiple testing for determining significance of GSMA results. CONCLUSION: Theoretical considerations detailed herein can lead to clarification and simplification of testing criteria for generalizations of the GSMA statistic.

Chromosome Mapping↗

PubMed2002

Systematic review and meta-analysis of monotherapy compared with combined androgen blockade for patients with advanced prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The current systematic review and meta-analysis compared monotherapy and combined androgen blockade in the treatment of men with advanced prostate carcinoma. Outcomes of interest included overall, cancer specific, and progression-free survival; time to treatment failure; adverse events; and quality of life. METHODS: The literature search identified randomized trials comparing monotherapy (orchiectomy and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonists) with combination therapy using orchiectomy or a LHRH agonist plus a nonsteroidal or steroidal antiandrogen. Dual independent review occurred. The meta-analysis used a random effects model. RESULTS: Twenty-one trials compared survival after monotherapy with survival after combined androgen blockade (n = 6871 patients). The meta-analysis found no statistically significant difference in survival at 2 years between patients treated with combined androgen blockade and those treated with monotherapy (20 trials; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.970; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.866-1.087). The authors determined a statistically significant difference in survival at 5 years that favored combined androgen blockade (10 trials; HR = 0.871; 95% CI, 0.805-0.942). For the subgroup of patients with a good prognosis, there was no statistically significant difference in survival. Adverse effects leading to withdrawal from therapy occurred more often with combined androgen blockade. To the authors' knowledge there is little evidence published to date comparing the effects of combined androgen blockade and monotherapy on quality of life, but the single randomized trial that adequately addressed this outcome reported an advantage for monotherapy over combined androgen blockade. CONCLUSIONS: A thorough examination of the usefulness of combined androgen blockade must balance the modest increase in expected survival observed at 5 years against the increased risk of adverse effects and the potential for adversely affecting the patient's overall quality of life.

Androgen Antagonists↗

PubMed1996

Intraventricular hemorrhage and high-frequency ventilation: a meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: The association between high-frequency ventilation (HFV) and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) has been debated. PURPOSE: To determine if premature neonates treated with HFV are at greater risk for developing IVH and/or PVL than neonates treated with conventional ventilation, we completed a meta-analysis of all prospective randomized control trials comparing HFV and conventional ventilation in the management of respiratory distress syndrome. METHODS: The meta-analysis included nine studies comparing HFV and conventional ventilation in the management of preterm neonates. To summarize the data, we calculated the difference in absolute risk for IVH and PVL between neonates treated with HFV and those treated with standard ventilation. These differences were combined to determine an overall difference in the absolute risk and its confidence interval. We examined the effect of estimated gestational age, birth weight, surfactant, and age at study entry on the results. Because one trial (HIFI study) was much larger than the other studies, it dominated the analysis, so we evaluated the data with and without including data from the HIFI trial. RESULTS: The occurrences of IVH and PVL ranged from 14% to 47% and 5% to 16%, respectively. This variation may be explained by the difference in the populations of neonates treated. The meta-analysis showed that use of HFV was associated with an increased risk of PVL (odds ratio = 1.7 with a confidence interval of 1.06 to 2.74), but not IVH or severe (> or = grade 3) IVH. When the results of the HIFI study were excluded, there were no differences between HFV and conventional ventilation in the occurrence of IVH or PVL. CONCLUSIONS: The association between HFV and adverse neurologic outcomes is primarily influenced by the results of the HIFI trial. Meta-analysis of more recent studies does not confirm the findings of the HIFI trial and suggests that HFV is not associated with increased occurrence of IVH or PVL.

Cerebral Hemorrhage↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Meta-analysis of three trials with quinapril in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension in the Mexican population.

A meta-analysis was performed to examine the therapeutic effect of quinapril in the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Data from three clinical trials conducted in Mexico and including a total of 426 patients were examined using a retrospective approach and statistical methods. The meta-analysis proved that quinapril induces positive diastolic and systolic responses at all the doses studied, particularly at the 10-mg dose. At this dose, 94.1% of patients reduced their diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 10 mm Hg or attained a DBP of < or = 90 mm Hg. Overall, quinapril reduced DBP by between 14.8 and 24.8 mm Hg proportionally to the baseline DBP. Systolic blood pressure decreased 16 to 35.7 mm Hg from baseline levels. We conclude that the meta-analysis allowed a clearer and more dependable handling of the results regarding effectiveness and optimum dose of quinapril.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The large volume of published randomized, controlled trials has led to a need for meta-analyses to track therapeutic advances. Performing a new meta-analysis whenever the results of a new trial of a particular therapy are published permits the study of trends in efficacy and makes it possible to determine when a new treatment appears to be significantly effective or deleterious. We describe the use of such a procedure, cumulative meta-analysis, to assess therapeutic trials among patients with myocardial infarction. METHODS: We performed cumulative meta-analyses of clinical trials that evaluated 15 treatments and preventive measures for acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS: An example of this method is its application to the use of intravenous streptokinase as thrombolytic therapy for acute infarction. Thirty-three trials evaluating this therapy were performed between 1959 and 1988. We found that a consistent, statistically significant reduction in total mortality (odds ratios, 0.74; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.92) was achieved in 1973, after only eight trials involving 2432 patients had been completed. The results of the 25 subsequent trials, which enrolled an additional 34,542 patients through 1988, had little or no effect on the odds ratio establishing efficacy, but simply narrowed the 95 percent confidence interval. In particular, two very large trials, the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico trial in 1986 (11,712 patients) and the Second International Study of Infarct Survival trial in 1988 (17,187 patients) did not modify the already established evidence of efficacy. We used a similar approach to study the accumulating evidence of efficacy (or lack of efficacy) of 14 other therapies and preventive measures for myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials facilitates the determination of clinical efficacy and harm and may be helpful in tracking trials, planning future trials, and making clinical recommendations for therapy.

Confidence Intervals↗

PubMed2026

Surgical management and outcomes of total colonic aganglionosis in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: Total colonic aganglionosis (TCA) is a rare form of Hirschsprung disease, and there is no consensus regarding its optimal surgical management. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate different surgical approaches and outcomes in children with TCA. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase was performed for studies published between January 2000 and December 2025. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251078401). Eligible studies included patients aged ≤18 years with TCA who underwent conventional pull-through procedures (CPT; Duhamel, Soave, Swenson, Rehbein, and Ikeda-Soper) or non-conventional techniques (NCPT; STATE procedure, J-pouch, right- or left-sided colonic patch pull-through, and ileocecal patch). A subgroup analysis comparing Duhamel and ileoanal pull-through procedures (IAPT) was also performed. Outcomes included fecal incontinence, Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis (HAEC), requirement for additional interventions, postoperative intestinal obstruction, and mortality. Meta-analysis was performed using jamovi software, version 2.3.28, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Seven studies including 134 patients compared CPT (n = 85) with NCPT (n = 49), and ten studies including 274 patients compared Duhamel (n = 143) with IAPT (n = 131). Across both comparisons, pooled odds ratios (ORs) showed no statistically significant differences in fecal incontinence, HAEC, requirement for additional interventions, postoperative intestinal obstruction (Duhamel vs IAPT only), or mortality. For CPT versus NCPT, the pooled ORs were 1.1 for fecal incontinence (95% CI, 0.44-2.73; p = 0.837), 1.1 for HAEC (95% CI, 0.49-2.71; p = 0.743), 4.3 for requirement for additional interventions (95% CI, 0.86-22.1; p = 0.074), and 3.4 for mortality (95% CI, 0.52-21.5; p = 0.198). For Duhamel versus IAPT, the pooled ORs were 1.4 for fecal incontinence (95% CI, 0.60-3.36; p = 0.423), 0.6 for HAEC (95% CI, 0.22-2.06; p = 0.503), 1.8 for requirement for additional interventions (95% CI, 0.62-5.50; p = 0.262), 1.1 for postoperative intestinal obstruction (95% CI, 0.21-6.01; p = 0.875), and 1.03 for mortality (95% CI, 0.25-4.20; p = 0.965). CONCLUSION: No statistically significant differences were identified between CPT and NCPT or between Duhamel and IAPT for the evaluated outcomes in children with TCA. However, the absence of statistically significant differences should not be interpreted as evidence of equivalence, particularly given the small sample sizes, wide confidence intervals, and clinical and methodological heterogeneity of the studies included. The choice of surgical approach should be individualized according to disease extent, patient-specific factors, institutional experience, and surgical expertise. TYPE OF STUDY: Meta-analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Humans↗

PubMed2002

[Diet therapy in chronic inflammatory bowel disease: results from meta-analysis and randomized controlled trials].

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are chronic inflammatory bowel diseases of unknown etiology. Unspecific immunosuppressive therapy represents current standard treatment and is often associated with severe side effects. Several treatment regimens have been evaluated to identify alternative therapeutic options. Among these different diet therapies were investigated. Objective of this paper is to review the results of diet therapy in chronic inflammatory bowel disease on the basis of randomised controlled trials and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. METHODS: Medline and Cochrane Library were searched for meta-analysis and randomised controlled trials investigating this question. Additionally reference lists of identified articles and text books were checked for further trials. RESULTS: Four meta-analyses investigated the treatment of acute Crohn's disease with elemental-, semi-elemental-, and polymeric diets in comparison to corticosteroids or to another form of enteral diet. All meta-analyses show a superiority of corticosteroids and no difference in the effect of the compared enteral diets. Randomised controlled trials investigating diet therapy in ulcerative colitis have not been summarised in a meta-analysis yet. Eleven randomised trials were identified which evaluated diets in ulcerative colitis patients: Dietary supplementation with n-3-fatty acids (6 trials), elemental diet [2], dietary supplementation with dietary fiber [1], elimination diet [1], and dietary supplementation with olestra [1]. Only for the elimination diet a significant positive effect on the course of disease was found in one trial which investigated only 18 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Enteral nutritional therapy of acute Crohn's disease is less effective than treatment with corticosteroids. In case of severe steroid induced side effects diet treatment can present a promising alternative. Superiority of one of the investigated different formulations was not found. Meta-analyses of randomised trials provide a clear and easy to understand presentation of the effect of this intervention. Eleven published trials investigating the effect of diets in ulcerative colitis show only for elimination diet a positive treatment effect. The trials do find a positive effect of one of the other interventions but the trials are very small and cannot exclude a treatment effect. Meta-analysis of these trials would be helpful for a better presentation and understanding of these results.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

PubMed2004

Labor analgesia and cesarean delivery: an individual patient meta-analysis of nulliparous women.

BACKGROUND: The authors performed an individual patient meta-analysis of 2,703 nulliparous women who were randomized to either epidural analgesia or intravenous opioids for pain relief during labor from five trials conducted at their hospital. The primary purpose in this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of epidural analgesia during labor on the rate of cesarean delivery. METHODS: Between November 1, 1993, and November 3, 2000, 2,703 nulliparous women (2,188 healthy parturients and 515 women with pregnancy-induced hypertension) in spontaneous labor at term were randomized to receive either epidural analgesia or intravenous opioid analgesia in the five studies. Epidural analgesia was initiated with either epidural bupivacaine or intrathecal sufentanil and was maintained with a low-dose (0.0625% or 0.125%) mixture of bupivacaine with fentanyl. Intravenous opioid analgesia was initiated with 50 mg meperidine and 25 mg promethazine hydrochloride and was maintained with intravenous boluses of meperidine as needed. RESULTS: A total of 1,339 nulliparous women were randomized to receive epidural analgesia, and 1,364 women were randomized to receive intravenous meperidine analgesia. There was no difference in the rate of cesarean deliveries between the two analgesia groups (epidural analgesia, 10.5% [140 of 1,339] vs. intravenous meperidine analgesia, 10.3% [141 of 1,364]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.34; P = 0.920). Significantly more women randomized to epidural analgesia had forceps deliveries compared to meperidine analgesia (13% [172 of 1,339] vs. 7% [101 of 1,364]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-2.40; P < 0.001). Epidural women had longer first and second stages of labor. Women who received epidural analgesia reported lower pain scores during labor and delivery compared to women who received intravenous meperidine analgesia. CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia compared to intravenous meperidine analgesia during labor does not increase the number of cesarean deliveries.

Adult↗