SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,027 records · Page 57Linked to original sources

PubMed2001

Overview of the effectiveness of triple combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 infected adults.

AIM: To estimate the effectiveness of triple combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive adults. METHODS: A systematic overview of results from clinical trials involving triple combination therapy with dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) and: a protease inhibitor (PI triple); a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI triple); or a third NRTI (triple NUC). Data from 23 clinical trials involving 31 independent treatment groups, 19 unique antiretroviral regimens, and 3257 enrolled patients were included in this study. RESULTS: Median log(10) baseline plasma HIV RNA and CD4 cell count over all trials averaged 4.69 (49,329 copies/ml) and 375 x 10(6) cells/l, respectively. The overall estimated percentage of patients with plasma HIV RNA < or = 400 copies/ml at 24 weeks was 64% [95% confidence interval (CI), 60 to 67%]. The percentages of patients with plasma HIV RNA < or = 50 copies/ml at 48 weeks by drug class were: PI triple, 46% (95% CI, 41 to 52%); NNRTI triple, 51% (95% CI, 43 to 59%); triple NUC, 45% (95% CI, 36 to 54%). The CD4 cell count increase over all trials at 24 and 48 weeks averaged +123 x 10(6) cells/l (95% CI, 111 x 10(6) to 135 x 10(6) cells/l) and +160 x 10(6) cells/l (95% CI, 146 x 10(6) to 175 x 10(6) cells/l), respectively and did not differ between drug classes. In multivariable regression analysis, neither baseline plasma HIV RNA level and CD4 cell count nor treatment regimen predicted plasma HIV RNA < or = 50 copies/ml at week 48. However, pill count was significantly negatively associated with plasma HIV RNA < or = 50 copies/ml at week 48 (P = 0.0085). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that three drug regimens containing two NRTI with a PI, a NNRTI, or a third NRTI may provide comparable activity, and practical issues such as daily pill burden should be considered when choosing a treatment regimen.

CD4 Lymphocyte Count↗

PubMed2004

Flexible docking of pyridinone derivatives into the non-nucleoside inhibitor binding site of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.

Potent non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) of the pyridinone derivative type were docked into nine NNRTIs binding pockets of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) structures. The docking results indicate that pyridinone analogues adopt a butterfly conformation and share the same binding mode as the crystal inhibitors in the pocket geometries of nevirapine, 1051U91, 9-Cl-TIBO, Cl-alpha-APA, efavirenz, UC-781, and S-1153. The results are in agreement with the data concerning mutational and structure-activity relationships available for pyridinone analogues and aid in the understanding, at the molecular level, of the biological response of published hybrid pyridinone molecules. Strategies to design further pyridinone derivatives active against RT containing mutations are discussed.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

PubMed2006

Comparison of the risks of atherosclerotic events versus death from other causes associated with antiretroviral use.

BACKGROUND: Studies considering the risk of atherosclerotic disease (AtD) associated with the use of HAART have reported inconsistent results. METHODS: Data on antiretroviral therapy (ART) use, risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), AtD and death from other causes in 18 603 HIV-infected patients from two established cohorts were evaluated. The relative hazards of AtD and death from other causes were calculated using a proportional hazards competing risks framework. The impact of protease inhibitor (PI)-containing, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-containing or PI + NNRTI-containing regimens on these outcomes were compared to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-only regimens or stopping therapy, adjusting for known CVD risk factors. RESULTS: In 77 480 person-years of follow-up (median duration 3.49 years) there were 318 AtD events including 92 myocardial infarctions and 2044 deaths. Older age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, having smoked and HIV disease stage were significantly associated with increased risk of AtD. PI- and NNRTI-containing regimens significantly reduced the joint risk of either AtD or death from other causes compared to NRTI-only or stopping therapy [hazard ratio (HR) for PI-containing ART, 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-0.78, P< 0.001; NNRTI-containing ART, 0.69, 95% CI, 0.65-0.74; P< 0.001). PI-containing ART was associated with a borderline significant increased risk of myocardial infarction (cause-specific HR for PI-containing ART 1.19, 95% CI, 1.01-1.40, P = 0.04) but not with increased risk of AtD compared to NRTI-only regimens or stopping therapy (cause-specific HR for PI-containing ART, 1.03, 95% CI, 0.95-1.13, P = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: Overall benefits of PI- and NNRTI-based ART in reducing mortality significantly outweigh any risks of AtD in the "short-term" follow-up of this study. Traditional cardiac risk factors play an important role in determining AtD risk status.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Elevated blood pressure in HIV-infected individuals receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the effects of antiretroviral regimens on blood pressure (BP). METHOD: This retrospective study examined systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) measurements among participants of a State of Hawaii Department of Health program from January 1995 to July 2001. The change in BP during four consecutive 6-month visits was estimated using linear regression and was interpreted as the change in BP per year. BP changes among the antiretroviral treatment groups were compared to untreated controls. RESULTS: Of 1,601 patients identified, 286 met the criteria for inclusion. After adjustment for baseline age, BP, and CD4+ count, there was an increase in SBP by 4.71 mmHg/year (p =.005) and DBP by 2.26 mmHg/year (p =.076) among patients initiating HAART. Among these patients, an increase of 4.75 mmHg/year in SBP (p =.002) and 1.96 mmHg/year in DBP (p =.042) was seen with HAART regimens containing a protease inhibitor (PI) but no nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). In NNRTI-containing HAART regimens without PIs, an increase of 3.21 mmHg/year in SBP (p =.011) and 2.62 mmHg/year in DBP (p =.050) was observed. No significant BP changes were noted with patients on regimens containing only nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). CONCLUSION: The use of NNRTI- or PI-containing HAART is associated with elevation of both SBP and DBP in HIV-infected individuals.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Rational approaches to resistance: nucleoside analogues.

AIM: To review knowledge of drug-resistance patterns to nucleoside HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors and how this can be used to advantage in patient management. PATTERNS OF RESISTANCE: The speed of emergence of HIV-1 drug resistance is dependent on host, viral and drug factors. Resistance to zidovudine develops over months to years, and is associated with mutations in HIV reverse transcriptase at positions 41, 67, 70, 215 and 219. Reductions in susceptibility to didanosine, zalcitabine and stavudine develop more slowly and are lower than those seen with zidovudine. Resistance to lamivudine develops rapidly, in weeks to months; selection of a pre-existing mutated viral strain results in a 1000-fold reduction in susceptibility. There is some cross-resistance between nucleoside antiretroviral agents, particularly among didanosine, zalcitabine and lamivudine. SUPPRESSION OF RESISTANCE: Some agents induce mutations that reverse or suppress zidovudine resistance; combination therapy with these drugs may delay the emergence of multidrug-resistance, but the mutational flexibility of the HIV-1 virus means that drug resistant isolates will eventually develop. Combining HIV protease inhibitors that strongly suppress viral replication with nucleoside inhibitors also delays the emergence of resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Widespread use of nucleoside HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitors that incompletely suppress viral replication has led to the emergence of resistant viral strains, with a consequent risk of transmission of drug-resistant virus. Combinations of protease inhibitors and reverse transcriptase inhibitors may slow viral replication sufficiently to prevent generation of resistant virus, to extend the duration of antiviral activity and increase the benefit to patients.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

PubMed1996

CD8+ lymphocyte responses to antiretroviral therapy of HIV infection.

CD8+ T lymphocytes may mediate important host responses to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection by human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-restricted cytotoxicity and production of soluble HIV suppressor factors. CD8+ lymphocytes are also important for the suppression of many latent pathogens responsible for opportunistic disease in HIV-infected patients. There has been no systematic analysis of the responses of CD8+ lymphocyte counts to antiretroviral therapy. We compared CD8+ lymphocyte responses in seven trials of nucleoside or non-nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors and in two trials of ritonavir, a HIV protease inhibitor. Nucleoside analog and non-nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor monotherapy resulted in no substantial changes in CD8+ counts relative to baseline or placebo. Combination nucleoside analog therapy resulted in variable peak responses (-145 to +240 cells/mm3), which remained significantly above baseline for 0 to 12 weeks. In contrast, ritonavir monotherapy caused a peak increase of 892 CD8+ cells/mm3, which remained significantly above baseline for 32 weeks. There was a significant correlation (Rs 0.61, p = 0.01) between the peak CD4+ cell and CD8+ responses to each therapy, but no significant correlation between the peak viral load responses and peak CD8+ cell responses. These findings suggest that the greater CD8+ response seen with ritonavir may be due to its specific inhibition of HIV protease and also that the CD8+ response is dependent on new CD4+ cell production. The CD8+ lymphocyte proliferation observed with protease inhibitor therapy could result in improved suppression of HIV replication by the immune system and should be confirmed in a prospective trial comparing protease inhibitors with both nucleoside and non-nucleoside analog therapies.

Acetamides↗

PubMed2004

Genotypic resistance testing in HIV-infected pregnant women in an urban setting.

This study examines the utility of HIV genotypic resistance testing (GT) in pregnant women at their initial pregnancy evaluation. A retrospective medical record review of 50 consecutive HIV-infected pregnant women in whom GT was obtained in the Bronx, New York was conducted. Twenty-eight (56%) were antiretroviral experienced, including 12 on antiretroviral therapy (ART) at time of GT. Major mutations were found in 11 (24%) of 45 amplifiable GTs. Major resistance mutations were identified against nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in six (13%) patients; against non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) in eight (18%) patients, and against protease inhibitors in two (4%) patients. Duration of ART exposure was significantly associated with identification of resistance mutations by GT for NRTIs and NNRTIs (P < or =0.05). Results of this study indicate that GT at presentation may have implications on the initial choice of ART in up to one-quarter of HIV-infected pregnant women, especially with current or prior antiretroviral use.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Susceptibility of HIV-2, SIV and SHIV to various anti-HIV-1 compounds: implications for treatment and postexposure prophylaxis.

Limited information is available on the activity of antiretroviral drugs against human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) strains to guide their use in treatment or prophylaxis. We evaluated the antiviral activity of 16 approved drugs and one experimental drug, AMD3100, against two wild-type HIV-2 (ROD and EHO) isolates, two strains of SIV (mac251 and B670), and two strains of simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) that contain the reverse transcriptase (RTSHIV) or envelope glycoprotein (SHIV89.6) of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in a SIV(mac239) background. Drug susceptibility was measured conventionally by the MT-4/MTT assay, and results were analysed as fold changes in 50% effective concentration (EC50) relative to the EC50 for HIV-1 (IIIB). The nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) zidovudine, lamivudine, stavudine, didanosine, zalcitabine and abacavir as well as the nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor tenofovir retained full activity against all six viruses except for SIV and SHIV89.6 that showed low-level resistance to didanosine. The protease inhibitors (PIs) ritonavir, indinavir, saquinavir and nelfinavir were found to be active against some HIV-2 or SIV strains. However, a significant reduction in susceptibility was seen with indinavir against SHIV89.6 (3.3-fold), and with amprenavir against HIV-2(ROD) (8.8-fold). All viruses except for RTSHIV showed a >200-fold decrease in susceptibility for the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) nevirapine, delavirdine and efavirenz, indicating high-level resistance. AMD3100, a CXCR4 antagonist, was active against HIV-2 and SHIV89.6, a finding consistent with the use of the CXCR4 co-receptor by these isolates, but was inactive against SIV strains. In contrast, enfuvirtide (T-20) was active against SHIV89.6 but had reduced inhibitory activity against both HIV-2 and SIV strains predicting little therapeutic value against these viruses. These findings support the use of NRTIs, tenofovir, but not NNRTIs, for treating HIV-2-infected persons or for prophylaxis against HIV-2 and SIV. The clinical significance of the low-level resistance of HIV-2 and SIV to some PIs is unclear. Co-receptor antagonists such as AMD3100 show promising anti-HIV-2 therapeutic modalities. Both AMD3100 and enfuvirtide could be used for prophylaxis against SHIV89.6.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2001

Evidence for prolonged clinical benefit from initial combination antiretroviral therapy: Delta extended follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The findings from therapeutic trials in HIV infection with surrogate endpoints based on laboratory markers are only partially relevant for clinical decisions on treatment. Although the collection of clinical follow-up data from such a trial would be relatively straightforward, this rarely occurs. An important reason for this may be the perception that such data have little value because the number of participants remaining on their original allocated therapy has usually fallen substantially. METHODS: Delta was an international, multicentre trial in which 3207 HIV infected individuals were randomly allocated to treatment with zidovudine (ZDV) alone, ZDV combined with didanosine (ddI) or ZDV combined with zalcitabine (ddC). Although the trial closed in September 1995, information on vital status, AIDS events, treatment changes and CD4 counts was still collected every 12 months until at least March 1997. This has allowed analyses of the longer term clinical effect of treatment. RESULTS: The median follow-up to date of death or last known vital status was 43 months (10th percentile 18 months; 90th percentile 55 months). The proportion of participants remaining on their allocated treatment fell steadily over time; by 4 years after trial entry, 3% remained on ZDV, 20% on ZDV + ddI and 21% on ZDV + ddC. Changes mainly involved the stopping, addition or switching of a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTIs). There was little use of protease inhibitors (PIs) or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) before the third year of the trial. Between the third and fourth years, regimens included a drug from one of these classes for approximately 17% of person-time in all treatment groups. Relative to ZDV monotherapy, the beneficial effects of combination therapy on mortality and disease progression rates increased significantly with time since randomization. The maximum effects on mortality were observed between 2 and 3 years, with a 48% reduction for ZDV + ddI and a 26% reduction for ZDV + ddC. These rates were observed when the original allocated treatment was received 42% and 47% of the time in the ZDV + ddI and ZDV + ddC groups, respectively. The mean CD4 count remained significantly higher (approximately 50 cells/microL) in the combination therapy groups 4 years after randomization, suggesting a projection of a clinical benefit beyond this time point. CONCLUSIONS: The sustained clinical effect of the initial allocation to combination therapy, particularly ZDV + ddI, was remarkable in light of the convergence of drug regimens actually received across the three treatment groups. Interpretation of this finding is not straightforward. One of the possible explanations is that the effectiveness of ddI and ddC is diminished if first used later in infection or with greater prior exposure to ZDV, although the data do not clearly support either hypothesis. This analysis highlights the value of long-term clinical follow-up of therapeutic trials in HIV infection, which should be considered in the planning of all new studies.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

PubMed1995

Comparative anti-HIV evaluation of diverse HIV-1-specific reverse transcriptase inhibitor-resistant virus isolates demonstrates the existence of distinct phenotypic subgroups.

We have biologically and biochemically evaluated a structurally diverse group of HIV-1-specific reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors and determined that the members of this class share many common properties. These include reproducible and selective antiviral activity against a panel of biologically distinct laboratory and clinical strains of HIV-1, activity against HIV-1 in a wide variety of cultured and fresh human cells, and potent inhibition of HIV-1 RT when evaluated using a heteropolymeric ribosomal RNA template assay. Each of the HIV-1-specific compounds was capable of inhibiting HIV replication when challenged at high m.o.i., further distinguishing them from the nucleoside analogs 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine (AZT) and 2',3'-dideoxycytidine (ddC). When tested in combination with AZT, each of the HIV-1-specific compounds synergistically inhibited the replication of HIV-1. HIV-1 isolates resistant to different HIV-1-specific inhibitors exhibited heterogeneous patterns of cross-resistance to other members of this pharmacologic class. Four distinct phenotypic classes have been defined through the use of drug-resistant virus isolates which derive from distinct mutations in the RT. These results indicate that the various subgroups of HIV-1-specific inhibitors interact differently with HIV-1 RT, suggesting important potential implications for drug combination therapeutic strategies.

Antiviral Agents↗

PubMed2004

Changing incidence of central nervous system diseases in the EuroSIDA cohort.

A drastic decrease in incidence has been observed for most human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related opportunistic manifestations after use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). We assessed the trend of incidence of central nervous system (CNS) diseases in a prospective multicenter observational study involving 9,803 patients across Europe in the period 1994 to 2002 and analyzed patient and treatment variables associated with these conditions. Overall, 568 patients (5.8%) received a diagnosis of a new CNS disease. Incidence decreased significantly from 5.9 per 100 person-year in 1994 to 0.5 in 2002. Overall, the decrease was 40% per calendar year, and it was similar to that of non-CNS diseases and less evident after year 1998. In multivariable models, low CD4 cell count and high plasma viral load, but not HAART or calendar year, were significantly associated with risk to develop CNS disease, indicating that the effect of HAART was likely mediated by both improved immunological conditions and inhibition of viral replication. In contrast, use of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, irrespective of use of protease inhibitors or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, appeared to protect specifically against acquired immunodeficiency disease syndrome dementia complex, suggesting that, in this condition, therapy might have a direct, additive effect in the CNS.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMed2005

Residual viraemia in subjects with chronic HIV infection and viral load < 50 copies/ml: the impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors associated with < 2.5 copies/ml plasma HIV RNA in subjects treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and with viraemia < 50 copies/ml. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of 84 HIV-positive patients taking HAART with plasma HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml for at least 6 months and no history of virological failure. METHODS: Current HAART therapy was based on a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) in 66%, a protease inhibitor in 26% and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in 7%. Viraemia levels were measured using a modified ultrasensitive Roche Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor test able to quantify plasma HIV RNA to a lower limit of 2.5 copies /ml; proviral DNA was measured with a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. Analysis of variance and multiple logistic regression analysis were utilized to test for associations between residual replication and other variables. RESULTS: Residual HIV viraemia > 2.5 copies/ml was found in 50% of subjects; 94% of subjects had detectable proviral DNA (>or= 20 copies/10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells) and 21% had archived mutations. Usage of a NNRTI-based HAART was the only independent predictor of viral suppression below the cut-off value of the modified ultrasensitive assay. CONCLUSIONS: In our population, NNRTI-based HAART seems to have a stronger impact on residual replication than protease inhibitor-based HAART. This finding may be considered in therapeutic decisions such as the choice of initial HAART regimen and the interruption or simplification of treatment.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Discrepant results in the interpretation of HIV-1 drug-resistance genotypic data among widely used algorithms.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the concordance on the interpretation of HIV-1 drug-resistance genotypic data by three widely used algorithms: Stanford University Database (SU), TruGene (Visible Genetics, Canada) (VG) and VirtualPhenotype (Virco, Belgium) (VP). METHODS: Genotypic data from 293 HIV-1-infected individuals with treatment failure was interpreted for 14 antiretroviral drugs by the three algorithms. RESULTS: Complete concordant results among the three systems for all the drugs studied were found in 40/293 (13.7%) samples. Low concordance in the interpretation was observed for most nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), while results agreed highly for all nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and most protease inhibitors (PIs). In pair-wise comparisons, discordant interpretations between SU and VP were found in over 50% of the samples for didanosine, zalcitabine, stavudine and abacavir, and the level of disagreement between VG and VP exceeded 40% for the same drugs. Major discrepancies (high-level resistance interpretation by one algorithm with sensitive interpretation by another) were observed between VG and VP in over 10% of the cases for didanosine, zalcitabine, stavudine and abacavir. On the other hand, the three algorithms had concordant results for lamivudine in over 90% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates the great level of discordance in the interpretation of genotyping results among algorithms, clearly showing the necessity for clinical validation. Moreover, these results suggest that a joint effort from the scientific community as well as national and international HIV societies is needed to achieve a consensus for the interpretation of genotypic data.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2001

Nelfinavir, efavirenz, or both after the failure of nucleoside treatment of HIV infection.

BACKGROUND: The optimal antiretroviral treatment for patients who have human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viremia despite treatment with nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (nucleoside analogues) remains uncertain. We studied treatment with regimens that combined two nucleoside analogues, at least one of which was new, with the protease inhibitor nelfinavir, the nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor efavirenz, or both. METHODS: The study included 195 patients who had been treated with nucleoside analogues only, and had a plasma HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA level of at least 500 copies per milliliter. Patients were randomly assigned to receive, in addition to two nucleoside analogues, nelfinavir, efavirenz, or nelfinavir plus efavirenz. The primary end point was a plasma HIV-1 RNA level of less than 500 copies per milliliter at week 16. A secondary end point was the composite of the HIV-1 RNA levels measured at weeks 40 and 48. RESULTS: At week 16 and at weeks 40 and 48, the proportions of patients in whom a plasma HIV-1 RNA level of less than 500 copies per milliliter was achieved were, respectively, 81 percent and 74 percent in the nelfinavir-plus-efavirenz group, 69 percent and 60 percent in the efavirenz group, and 64 percent and 35 percent in the nelfinavir group. Quadruple therapy resulted in a higher rate of viral suppression in both the short term (P=0.03) and the long term (P=0.001) than did triple therapy with nelfinavir. Triple therapy with efavirenz conferred a higher rate of long-term suppression than triple therapy with nelfinavir (P=0.004). Quadruple therapy also achieved a higher rate of virologic suppression than triple therapy with efavirenz (P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In HIV-infected patients previously treated with nucleoside analogues, treatment with nelfinavir plus efavirenz and at least one new nucleoside analogue achieves a higher rate of viral suppression than do regimens with nucleoside analogues and nelfinavir or efavirenz alone.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

The newly synthetized pyridobenzoxazocynone inhibits HIV-1 reverse transcriptase activity.

We synthetized pyridobenzoxazocynone that differs in the enlarged eight-membered heterocyclic system from the basic structure of pyridobenzoxazepinones a known class of non-nucleoside HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Pyridobenzoxazocynone hydrochloride was found to inhibit HIV-1 reverse transcriptase activity. At concentration 0.35 microM the enzyme activity decreased by 64 +/- 14%. Higher concentrations of pyridobenzoxazocynone hydrochloride completely abolished the enzyme activity expressed as radioactivity of acid insoluble products. These results suggest that pyridobenzoxazocynones may represent a new class of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Gene Products, pol↗

PubMed2002

Role of sequencing in therapy selection.

The goals of sequencing antiretroviral agents are to preserve as many treatment options as possible, minimize drug toxicity, and prolong suppression of HIV. There are numerous options for sequencing antiretroviral agents when treatment fails. The most common reasons for treatment failure are the emergence of resistance and poor adherence. Data indicate that protease inhibitor therapy enhanced by ritonavir may delay the development of resistance longer than nonboosted protease inhibitor therapy. The results of using efavirenz or abacavir to simplify protease inhibitor treatment regimens for HIV-suppressed patients are promising. Although resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors is a serious problem, sequencing them after zidovudine or abacavir therapy may be effective because of the hypersusceptibility to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors exhibited by viral populations in many nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-experienced patients. New antiretrovirals with greater tolerability, higher genetic barriers, and less cross-resistance than existing agents are needed to achieve further dramatic advances in treating HIV infection.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMed2005

Review: mixing new cocktails: drug interactions in antiretroviral regimens.

Current highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for the treatment of HIV infection requires the concomitant administration of three or four different agents, often with a high potential for drug-drug interactions. Additionally, some HIV-positive patients still require concomitant treatment with drugs for opportunistic infections, some require medication to treat unrelated medical conditions and/or the metabolic complications of antiretroviral therapy, others may self-medicate with herbal formulations and/or over-the-counter drugs, and still others many take drugs for recreational reasons or to manage addiction. Therefore, the virtually limitless number of drug combinations that may be taken by patients undergoing treatment of HIV infection makes drug-drug interactions almost inevitable. Managing these interactions is one of the major challenges associated with the multidrug regimens used for HIV therapy. This paper provides an overview of the most common interactions between antiretrovirals in the same and different classes-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), protease inhibitors (PI), and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI)-by focusing on principles rather than specific interactions. The paper also addresses interactions between these antiretrovirals and other commonly used medications that may be prescribed concomitantly.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

PubMed2005

Adverse effects of antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection: a review of selected topics.

In the current era of HIV treatment, the toxicity profiles of antiretroviral drugs have increasingly emerged as a basis for selecting initial antiretroviral regimens as well as a reason for switching therapy in treatment-experienced patients. In this respect, an intensive research effort involving clinical research as well as basic science research over the past six years, has focused on the cluster of metabolic and body composition abnormalities that have come to be termed the 'lipodystrophy syndrome'. These data have now provided a clear and clinically relevant understanding of the individual profiles of drugs within the nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor , HIV protease inhibitor and non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor drug classes, and have provided a rational basis for assessing and monitoring these adverse effects in clinical practice. In this review, current and emerging drug toxicities are considered with an emphasis on lipodystrophy complications.

Adenine↗