PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Referred Pain”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,045 records · Page 58Linked to original sources

Criteria for the classification of osteoarthritis of the knee and hip.

The Osteoarthritis (OA) Criteria Subcommittee of the American Rheumatism Association set out to develop (a) a classification of OA that includes recognised subsets; and (b) subsets of OA identified by a combination of clinical and laboratory features. For the purposes of classification, OA should be specified if of unknown origin (idiopathic, primary) or if related to a known medical condition or event (secondary). Clinical criteria for classification of idiopathic OA of the knee were developed through a multicentre study group involving 130 patients with OA and 107 comparison patients. Comparison diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other painful conditions of the knee exclusive of referred or para-articular pain. Variables from the history, physical examination, laboratory test results and radiographs were used to develop sets of criteria that serve different investigative purposes: clinical examination (sensitivity 89%; specificity 88%); clinical examination and laboratory tests (sensitivity 88%; specificity 93%); clinical examination, laboratory tests and radiographs (sensitivity 94%; specificity 88%). In contrast to prior classification criteria, the proposed criteria utilise decision trees or algorithms. Clinical criteria for classification of idiopathic OA of the hip are under development. Comparison groups are comprised of patients with other rheumatic diseases (e.g. RA), periarticular pain (e.g. trochanteric bursitis) and referred pain (e.g low back pain). From a method of opinion sampling, OA of the hip may be suggested by a combination of clinical criteria including the following: age greater than 40 years, weight-bearing pain, pain relieved by sitting, antalgic gait, decreased painful range of motion, a normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and a negative rheumatoid factor test.

Algorithms↗

[Effects of pain control education on pain control barrier, postoperative pain and pain control satisfaction in gynecological patients].

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of preoperative pain control education on the pain control barrier, postoperative pain and pain control satisfaction in gynecological patients. METHOD: The study was a quasi-experimental research design. There were 58 subjects who were admitted for gynecological surgery to D University Hospital in B city. Pain control education was provided individually to the experimental group one day before their operation day for 20 minutes with the 'Pain Control Guide Book' in the patient's admission room. The education book was made by researchers based on pain management references and patient interviews. For assessing the pain control barrier, a simplified version of Barriers Questionnaire was used, postoperative pain was assessed on a numeric scale(0-10) and satisfaction of pain control was assessed by one question. RESULTS: The pain control barrier(F=15.828, p<.001) and the post pain score of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group. In addition, pain control satisfaction of the experimental group(t=3.612, p<.001) was higher than the control group's. CONCLUSION: With the above results, preoperative pain control education could be an effective nursing intervention for pain control of surgical patients.

Adult↗

Comorbid subjective health complaints in low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVES: To compare subjective health complaints in subacute patients with low back pain with reference values from a Norwegian normal population. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Comorbidity is common with nonspecific low back pain. We wanted to investigate if these complaints were specific or part of a more general unspecific condition comparable to subjective health complaints in the normal population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 457 patients sick-listed 8 to 12 weeks for low back pain. All subjects filled out questionnaires. The subjective health complaints in the study group were compared with reference values from a Norwegian normal population using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Compared with the normal reference population, the patients with low back pain had significantly more low back pain, neck pain, upper back pain, pain in the feet during exercise, headache, migraine, sleep problems, flushes/heat sensations, anxiety, and sadness/depression. The prevalence of pain in arms, pain in shoulders, and tiredness was also high, but not significantly higher than in the reference population. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that patients with low back pain suffer from what may be referred to as a "syndrome," consisting of muscle pain located to the whole spine as well as to legs and head, and accompanying sleep problems, anxiety, and sadness/depression.

Adult↗

Pain: an account of nurses' talk.

This paper examines how nurses refer to pain and pain management in their talk. The documentation of talk was established after engaging a group of five nurses in a series of in-depth unstructured interviews lasting approximately 1 hour, in which they were encouraged to discuss their ideas regarding how postoperative pain should be managed, to render it more effective as an aspect of patient care. However, the talk revealed that nurses tended to categorize patients according to symptoms or overt pain behaviours. This essentially resulted in patients not being believed when they signalled that pain was becoming a distressing symptom. The paper also discusses how nurses' knowledge regarding pain and pain management influences the way in which they manage postoperative pain.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Studies on the effect of systemic PD134308 (CAM 958) in spinal reflex and pain models with special reference to interaction with morphine and intrathecal galanin.

The effect of intravenous (i.v.) PD134308, which is a CCK-B antagonist, morphine and intrathecal (i.t.) galanin (GAL) on the excitability of the spinal nociceptive flexor reflex and in the hot plate test was examined in rats. PD134308 (1 mg/kg, i.v.) caused a weak, naloxone-reversible depression of the flexor reflex and moderate antinociception in the hot plate test. PD134308 significantly potentiated the antinociceptive effect of morphone, as well as its depressive effect on the flexor reflex. PD134308 and i.t. GAL synergistically depressed the flexor reflex, which was reversed by naloxone. Finally, the magnitude and duration of the depression of the flexor reflex by morphine was synergistically increased by coadministering i.v. PD134308 and i.t. GAL. The results demonstrate that a CCK antagonist directed to the central CCK-B receptor potentiates the analgesic effects of opioid and non-opioid drugs at spinal level in the rat, thus supporting the notion that CCK in the CNS may be an endogenous, physiological opioid antagonist.

Analgesics↗

[TRUS-guided biopsy: comparison of two anesthetic methods].

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study is to compare two analgesic techniques for ultrasound transrectal biopsy. Oral analgesia vs periprosthetic nerve blockade with 2% mevicaine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients were randomized prospectively into 2 groups, namely group I: 100 patients treated with metamizol, oral morphine 30 minutes before the procedure, and group II: 100 patients anesthesied with periprosthetic nerve blockade with 2% mepivacaine. Both groups were treated with bromacepán 3 mg 30 minutes before the biopsy. The first intention was to obtain 10 core TRUS-guided biopsy in all patients underwent. After the procedure, a ten visual analogue pain score (VAS) from 0 = no discomfort to 10 = severe pain was administered to the biopsied patients and a global estimation of pain associated with the procedure was obtained. Test T de Student was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, PSA and prostate volume. 3 core TRUS-guided biopsy were obtain in group I (3 +/- 1.3), and 10 in group II (5 +/- 1.2) In the periprosthetic block group (II) 95% of patients referred no pain after the procedure (VAS = 0), 2% middle pain (VAS = 5-6) and 3% strong pain (VAS = 7-8); while patients in group I referred 12.5% no pain, 42.4% middle pain, 20% strong pain. The level of pain reported by this group of patients was significantly different from those reported by patients who performed prostate biopsy with periprosthetic nerve blockade. (p < or = 0.05). There were no significant differences in major complications. CONCLUSIONS: The use of bilateral periprosthetic block with mepivacaine is a very effective and useful technique, well tolerated by the patient, which almost completely abolishes the pain and discomfort associated with the prostate biopsy procedure. And also allows increase the number of cores.

Adult↗

Illness behaviour and personality in intractable facial pain syndromes.

Management of intractable facial pain is often referred to a specialised Pain Relieving Clinic, especially in light of the evidence that psychological factors play a part in the maintenance of the pain. A group of 60 patients so referred were divided into two groups according to diagnosis. The 32 diagnosed as suffering from trigeminal neuralgia were found to be more likely to deny non-pain problems, less irritable, but less convinced that there was a physical disease process responsible for their pain, than the 28 patients with non-neuralgic facial pain. Personality factors did not discriminate between the two groups. The relevance of the difference between these two groups to our understanding of pain is discussed, as is the special place of pain in the face.

Face↗

The reliability of depression diagnosis in chronic low back pain. A pilot study.

The variability in estimated rates of major depressive disorder (MDD) in chronic pain samples may be accounted for by sample and methodological differences. Most studies rely on a single measure of depression and lack independent or repeated measures. This study investigated the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in a convenience sample of 18 patients disabled by low back pain (LBP) referred to, evaluated, and treated in a comprehensive pain rehabilitation program specifically designed to restore work readiness and return to work. Subjects had one or more spinal conditions, had work-related back pain for more than 6 months (x = 23.8), were Caucasian, predominantly young (x = 37.5) and male (55%), and were disabled on workers' compensation and approved for rehabilitation. The performance of three diagnostic procedures, the Pain Medicine Evaluation, an independent Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID), and Longitudinal Clinical Diagnosis were compared with the "gold standard" of the Final Diagnosis which incorporated information from the other three. Also, the performance of a questionnaire, The Pain & Mood Structural Interview (PMSI), designed to assess the causal relationship of pain and mood and specifically the confounding effects of physical factors, was examined. Thirteen of 18 patients (72%) were diagnosed with MDD at Final Diagnosis. MDD diagnosis was made on 4 of 18 patients (22%) on the initial Pain Medicine Evaluation and on 9 of 18 patients (50%) on the SCID, with only 1 ruled out by the confounding questionnaire, for a SCID current prevalence of 44%. Both the SCID and Pain Medicine Evaluation accurately diagnosed the MDD cases they identified; 9 of 13 MDD cases (69%) were precipitated by a physical factor other than their pain. Three episodes of MDD were ruled out by confounding. These findings are discussed in relation to their implications for assessing pain patients for psychiatric comorbidity.

Adult↗

Clinicians' quick reference guide to acute pain management in infants, children, and adolescents: operative and medical procedures. Pain Management Guideline Panel. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, US Department of Health and Human Services.

The management of pain is an important part of a health professional's role. The challenge for clinicians is to balance pain control with concern for patient safety and side effects of pain treatments. This is the second of two articles presenting the clinical highlights of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research's Panel to develop clinical practice guidelines for pain management. This article presents the clinical highlights related to the assessment and management of pain in infants and children.

Acute Disease↗

The anatomic and physiologic basis of local, referred and radiating lumbosacral pain syndromes related to disease of the spine.

Conscious perception and unconscious effects originating from the vertebral column and its neural structures, although complex, have definite pathways represented in a network of peripheral and central nervous system (CNS) ramifications. These neural relationships consequently result in superimposed focal and diffuse, local and remote conscious perceptions and unconscious effects. Any one or combination of somatic and autonomic signs and symptoms may potentially be observed in a particular patient. This variety and inconsistency may mislead or confuse both the patient and the physician. A clear understanding of the basic anatomic and physiologic concepts underlying this complexity should accompany clinical considerations of the potential significance of spondylogenic and neurogenic syndromes in any disease process affecting the spine.

Autonomic Nervous System↗

Participation in workplace design with reference to low back pain: a case for the improvement of the police patrol car.

Thirty Canadian police officers, divided into six groups, participated in the redesign of the interior of the patrol car. Three of the groups consisted of individuals having a history of low back disease. The effect of participating in a design process on the characteristics of the final design and on the perception of the low back pain was studied in a semi-experimental setting. The participants developed a strong commitment to the participatory design process, which was reflected in their productions. The differences between participants with and without a history of a low back disease was not marked. The former tended to stress posture-related elements in their analysis and design.

Automobiles↗

Pulsed radiofrequency: current clinical and biological literature available.

OBJECTIVE: Pulsed radiofrequency, where short bursts of radiofrequency energy are applied to nervous tissue, has been used by pain practitioners as a non- or minimally neurodestructive technique, alternative to radiofrequency heat lesions. Clinical advantages and mechanisms of this treatment remain unclear. The objective of this study was to review current clinical and laboratory data. DESIGN: We systematically searched the MEDLINE database (PubMed) and tables of contents of electronically available pain journals. Reference lists of relevant reports and international scientific pain congress abstract books were also hand searched. Only those reports on pulsed radiofrequency were withheld. RESULTS: The final analysis yielded 58 reports on the clinical use of pulsed radiofrequency in different applications: 33 full publications and 25 abstracts. We also retrieved six basic science reports, five full publications, and one abstract. CONCLUSIONS: The accumulation of these data shows that the use of pulsed radiofrequency generates an increasing interest of pain physicians for the management of a variety of pain syndromes. Although the mechanism of action has not been completely elucidated, laboratory reports suggest a genuine neurobiological phenomenon altering the pain signaling, which some have described as neuromodulatory. No side effects related to the pulsed radiofrequency technique were reported to date. Further research in the clinical and biological effects is justified.

Analgesia↗

Catastrophic thinking and the experience of pain during dental procedures.

In recent years, considerable research has addressed psychological predictors of pain, emotional distress, and avoidance in relation to dental treatment. Our work has focused on how "pain catastrophizing" impacts on the physical and emotional distress experienced during dental procedures. Pain catastrophizing refers to individuals' tendency to focus excessively on pain sensations and exaggerate their threat value, and to feel helpless in their efforts to reduce or manage their pain. Several studies reveal that pain catastrophizers report extreme pain even in response to dental procedures not typically considered to be painful. In this paper, we also discuss how practitioners who foster the disclosure of dental worries and concerns can significantly reduce the physical and emotional distress of patients who engage in catastrophic thinking.

Age Factors↗