SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Colonoscopy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,063 records · Page 59Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Rationale for colonoscopy screening and estimated effectiveness in clinical practice.

Colonoscopy screening has the highest anticipated level of effectiveness of the available colorectal cancer screening techniques. Its long-term cost-effectiveness is also comparable with or superior to other modalities. Evidence for the expected reduction in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality varies with colonoscopy screening from 50% to 90%, for reasons that are not fully understood. Maintaining a high standard of performance is critical with regard to achieving the highest level of effectiveness possible.

Adenoma↗

PubMed2003

Propofol versus remifentanil for monitored anaesthesia care during colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We conducted an open, prospective, randomized study to compare the efficacy, safety and recovery characteristics of remifentanil or propofol during monitored anaesthesia care in patients undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS: Forty patients were randomly assigned to receive either propofol (1 mg kg(-1) followed by 10 mg kg (-1) h(-1), n = 20) or remifentanil (0.5 microg kg(-1) followed by 0.2 microg kg(-1) min(-1), n = 20). The infusion rate was subsequently adapted to clinical needs. RESULTS: In the propofol group, arterial pressure and heart rate decreased significantly from the baseline. These variables remained unchanged in the remifentanil group, but hypoventilation occurred in 55% of patients. Early recovery was delayed in the propofol group (P < 0.002). Recovery of cognitive and psychomotor functions was faster in the remifentanil group. Fifteen minutes after anaesthesia, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test score was 28.6 +/- 12.8 versus 36.2 +/- 9.4 and the Trieger Dot Test score was 25.6 +/- 8.1 versus 18.7 +/- 4.1 in the propofol and remifentanil groups, respectively (both P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction, using a visual analogue scale, was higher in the propofol group (96 +/- 7 versus 77 +/- 21, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil proved efficient in reducing pain during colonoscopy. Emergence times were shorter and the recovery of cognitive function was faster with remifentanil compared with propofol. Remifentanil provided a smoother haemodynamic profile than propofol; however, the frequent occurrence of remifentanil-induced hypoventilation requires the cautious administration of this agent.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Premedication with tramadol in patients undergoing colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study.

Colonoscopy is often disturbed by poor patient tolerance; benzodiazepines or opiates are routinely used to overcome such problems, despite the possibility of undesired effects. Tramadol, an opiate analogue with potentially fewer side effects, has not been tested yet to this end. The aim of the study was therefore to evaluate the efficacy of tramadol as a premedication for the colonoscopic procedure. Fifty patients were randomly allocated to receive an i.v. infusion of 100 ml saline, with 100 mg tramadol or alone, before endoscopy. At the end of the procedure patients were asked to score the discomfort experienced and to give an exam evaluation. The endoscopist also analyzed his performance. Tramadol patients reported a pain score of 39 +/- 10 (mean +/- SE), compared to 45 +/- 8 for the placebo group (P = 0.25); the evaluation of endoscopy was also similar (tramadol, 66 +/- 12; placebo, 70 +/- 9; P = 0.15). The endoscopist also reported a similar score (65 +/- 4 after tramadol; 69 +/- 4 after placebo; P = 0.2). No significant sex- or age-related differences were detected. We conclude that tramadol, at least as a monotherapy, seems scarcely effective for controlling pain evoked by colonoscopy.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

[Comparison of a sulfate-free polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution with a standard solution for colonoscopy preparation].

In order to ameliorate the unpleasant salty taste of a standard PEG-electrolyte lavage solution and thus improving acceptance of colonoscopy cleansing, a new sulfate-free, low sodium PEG-solution has been developed as long as 10 years ago. Comparative studies regarding acceptance showed conflicting results. This study was intended to compare the standard solution L (Cololyt) with the sulfate-free solution S (Colo-Sol) on a prospective basis in a collective of average gastroenterology outpatients. The 144 patients who underwent colonoscopy ingested 1 liter of solutions L and S each on the evening before and another liter of the preferred solution (preference) in the morning of the day of examination. Moreover the taste of both solutions was rated (grading scale 0-10). Tolerance and efficacy were registered as well. Preference and thus acceptance presented very well-balanced. Solution L was preferred as frequent (by 50.7% of patients) as solution S (49.3%) which was originally claimed to be better tasting. The respective preferred solutions were rated equal with mean +/- SD values of 6.6 +/- 2.2 for L and 7.0 +/- 1.9 for S. Efficacy and tolerance did not differ from a clinical point of view.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2006

A model of stage of change to recommend colonoscopy among urban primary care physicians.

Theory is little used in the prediction of physician cancer screening stage of change. Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate the theoretical predictors of stage of change to recommend colonoscopy among 235 urban physicians. Constructs from the theory of planned behavior, social-cognitive theory, and the transtheoretical model were systematically tested. As predicted, contextual factors, such as the physicians' ages, their race-ethnicities, patient race-ethnicity, and office-related barriers to preventive care were associated with stage of change through self-efficacy, normative beliefs, and negative behavioral beliefs. The findings demonstrate the relevance of these models to studying the behavior of physicians and support the development of interventions that are tailored to normative beliefs and specific physician cognitions for colonoscopy recommendation.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Haemostatic responses and vasopressin release during colonoscopy in man.

1. During major abdominal surgery there are increases in Factor VIII and plasminogen activator activity, associated with elevated plasma concentrations of vasopressin, of a magnitude shown to affect haemostasis. 2. To investigate the mechanisms involved in the haemostatic response to surgery, 12 patients undergoing fibre-optic colonoscopy were studied, of which six had a complete and six had an incomplete examination. 3. Venous blood samples were taken before, during and after the procedure for assay of plasma vasopressin, adrenaline and noradrenaline concentrations, Factor VIII coagulant activity, von Willebrand factor antigen level, euglobulin clot lysis time, tissue-type plasminogen activator activity and tissue-type plasminogen activator inhibition. 4. In the six patients who underwent a complete procedure the median plasma vasopressin concentration rose from 0.6 pg/ml to 153 pg/ml during colonoscopy. Factor VII coagulant activity rose from 0.9 to 2.4 i.u./ml and von Willebrand factor antigen level rose from 139 to 224%. Plasminogen activator activity increased from 20 to 144 units and tissue-type plasminogen activator activity rose from 107 to 1338 m-i.u./ml, whereas tissue-type plasminogen activator inhibition fell from 4.8 to 1.0 i.u./ml. 5. In the six patients in whom a limited procedure was performed, there were no changes in haemostatic function or in plasma vasopressin concentration. Plasma concentrations of adrenaline and noradrenaline did not change in either group. 6. The results indicate that vasopressin regulates the intrinsic coagulation pathway and fibrinolytic system in the absence of adrenaline release.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Intravenous midazolam as a sedative for colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

METHODS: Forty patients, aged between 36 and 60 years, scheduled to undergo colonoscopic removal of colorectal polyps were randomly assigned to receive 0.9% saline solution (n = 20) or 0.05 mg/kg body weight of midazolam (n = 20) intravenously. RESULTS: Midazolam significantly (P < 0.001) increased the tolerance of patients to colonoscopy. It had no significant effect on pulse or systolic blood pressure during endoscopy. Arterial oxygen saturation decreased significantly (P < 0.01) during endoscopy in patients pre-treated with midazolam, but it did not decrease by more than 5%. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous midazolam is useful as a sedative for colonoscopy, but we recommend continuous oxygen saturation monitoring during endoscopy.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Closed loop control of sedation for colonoscopy using the Bispectral Index.

Sixteen patients undergoing colonoscopy were sedated with propofol using a closed-loop control system guided by the Bispectral Index (BIS). Propofol administration, via a target-controlled infusion, was controlled by a proportional-integral-differential control algorithm. The median (range) propofol target concentration during closed-loop control was 2.3 (1.7-3.6) microg.ml(-1). The performance characteristics of the system were excellent, with a median absolute performance error of 7 (1-15). Patients were drowsy yet rousable, with a median (range) BIS set-point of 80 (75-85). No patient became apnoeic, required airway support or became haemodynamically unstable whilst sedated. Eight patients moaned or moved during colonoscopy and four had recall. Median (range) time to full consciousness was 4 (2-20) min after the end of closed-loop control. Patient and surgeon satisfaction were high. We conclude that BIS may be a suitable control variable for closed-loop control of sedation with propofol.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): review.

Computed tomography examination of the colon performed after bowel cleansing and distension of the lumen with gas goes by several different names--CT colonography (CTC) and CT colography perhaps being the most common. Strictly, the term 'virtual colonoscopy' (VC), should be reserved for the process of examining 3-D, simulated endoluminal images with a capability to navigate through the bowel using appropriate software. Computed tomography colonography appears to be the name that has gained favour among radiologists, although it is suspected that 'virtual colonoscopy' will persist as a generic term due to its attractive 'high-tech' connotations for non-radiological medical and lay persons. Whatever the name, the technique has been made possible through the advent of fast helical CT scanners which allow acquisition of a volume of data, and of proprietary software which enables multiplanar reformatting and 3-D endoluminal reconstructions. It is evident that if CTC/VC can be shown to be acceptable to patients, safe, affordable and accurate, it has enormous potential as a diagnostic and screening tool for colorectal neoplasia.

Colon↗

PubMed2002

Colonoscopy training: the need for patience (patients).

BACKGROUND: The insertion of a colonoscope to the caecum is a difficult technique to teach and to learn. The most commonly used criterion for proficiency is completion rate and early experience is often discouraging. In order to document the learning curve and better define normal progress for the early learning experience, the performance of trainees during their first 100-125 cases was recorded. METHODS: The completion rate and time for office colonoscopy were recorded prospectively over a 5-year period for each of 18 trainees. Trainees' experience was analysed in groups of 25 cases, numbered chronologically. Completion rate was defined as the number of examinations completed to the caecum by the trainee expressed as a percentage of the number completed by the staff. RESULTS: The mean overall completion rate for trainees was 56.4% (range 27.8-83.9%). For the first five groups of 25 cases, the percentage completion rates (in order from first 25 cases to fifth 25 cases) were 43.1, 52.6, 49.3, 61.8 and 75.1%, respectively. There was a wide variation in completion rates between trainees, but no difference in time taken. (Time for trainees to complete the procedure, in order from the first 25 cases to fifth 25 cases: 18.7, 19.1, 19.4, 17.6 and 17.1 min, respectively.) CONCLUSIONS: Early experience in colonoscopy can be discouraging. At least 100 cases are needed to attain a level of proficiency that enables completion in two-thirds of cases, whereas 125 cases lead to an average completion rate of 75%.

Cecum↗

PubMed2003

Comparison of colonoscopies performed under sedation with propofol or with midazolam or without sedation.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that some patients are not able to tolerate colonoscopy without sedation because of low pain threshold, anxiety, colonic sensitivity and anatomical variations. Benzodiazepines are most commonly used, often in combination with pethidine. Our study compares sedation with propofol to midazolam and colonoscopy without sedation. METHODS: In this study 147 patients were examined. The patients were divided into three groups: The first group included patients in whom propofol was used for sedation, the second group included patients sedated with midazolam, and the third group was comprised of patients who received no sedation. Oxygen saturation and heart rate were recorded continuously by pulse oxymetry. Arterial blood pressure (BP) was monitored at 3-min intervals. RESULTS: A decrease in blood pressure and heart rate was documented in the first two groups (P < 0.001), whereas in group 3 we found an increase in both BP and heart rate (P < 0.001). Oxygen saturation dropped below 90 % in 11/102 patients sedated with propofol and in 9/23 sedated with midazolam. Two of 22 patients in whom no sedation was used were found to have oxygen saturation below 90 %. The recovery time was shorter (7 min) in group 1 (propofol) than in group 2 (midazolam), in which it was found to be 20 min. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that propofol provided good sedation with excellent pain control, a short recovery time and no significant haemodynamic side effects.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Immediate CT pneumocolon for failed colonoscopy; comparison with routine pneumocolon.

AIM: To assess the role and reliability of 2D CT pneumocolon in the diagnosis of colonic malignancy, and compare feasibility of referral sources. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study of 50 patients with suspected large bowel malignancy. Patients underwent bowel cleansing, rectal air insufflation and contrast enhanced CT with 5 mm collimation, 3 mm reconstruction and a pitch of 1.4. Subsequent correlation was with pathology (16), colonoscopy (13), barium enema (5), ERCP (1) and clinical follow-up alone (8). RESULTS: Diagnostic images were obtained in 43/50 patients (86% feasibility). Follow-up was obtained in 35/43 patients (one patient died of an unrelated cause, and seven patients were deemed unfit for further investigation). Seventeen colonic carcinomas were diagnosed (three false-positives: one ischaemic colitis, one diverticular stricture and one faecal mass), one diverticular stricture, one fistula, one pancreatic carcinoma and one ovarian malignancy. The remaining 14 were negative. Overall sensitivity was 100% (for lesions >1.5 cm) with a specificity of 94% for structural abnormalities, but only 82% for the correct identification of malignancy. CONCLUSION: Computed tomography (CT) pneumocolon is a reliable alternative to barium enema where colonoscopy is incomplete, with the advantage of extraluminal screening, and examination of the proximal bowel. In the frail elderly or young unfit patient, it is a valuable additional diagnostic tool.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Can colonoscopy diagnose transmural ischaemic colitis after abdominal aortic surgery? An evidence-based approach.

OBJECTIVES: to assess the diagnostic value of colonoscopy in ischaemic colitis following abdominal aortic surgery, based on a literature review, and to introduce the concept of evidence-based medicine. METHOD: a review of the literature according to evidence-based principles was made by all doctors of our department. RESULTS: seven prospective non-randomised reports on routine colonoscopy after abdominal aortic surgery were found. None of the participants found all the reports, and the last was identified by the reviewer. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy may disclose ischaemic colitis, but cannot separate transmural from the clinically less important mucosal ischaemia. Endoscopy had no impact on mortality in any of the prospective series. The evidence-based conference was an inspiring teaching modality, and illustrated for the participants the difficulty in performing a targeted literature search.

Aorta, Abdominal↗

PubMed1997

Virtual colonoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging: in vitro evaluation of a new concept.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Screening for colonic polyps is desirable. A new concept based on cross-sectional and endoscopic analysis of a magnetic resonance (MR) data set is presented. METHODS: Ex vivo autopsy colonic specimens, containing artificially placed polyps, were obtained and filled with a gadolinium-containing solution. Forty-four thin-section MR images were obtained in a 1.5-T MR scanner in 28 seconds. A three-dimensional endoscopic fly-through of these images was rendered. Fly-throughs and two-dimensional cross-sectional images were analyzed by two observers for the presence of polyps. RESULTS: The average sensitivity and specificity for the detection of polyps based on three-dimensional endoscopic MR colon imaging were 87% and 96%, respectively. Analysis of cross-sectional images showed an overall sensitivity and specificity of merely 57% and 84%, respectively. The difference in the interpretation of three-dimensional MR colonoscopy and two-dimensional cross-sections was statistically significant (P < 0.001). With three-dimensional MR colonoscopy, overall sensitivity for detection of polyps measuring < or =5 mm in length and diameter was 70%; for larger polyps, it increased to 95% (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of an MR-based endoluminal assessment of the colon is shown. Minimal invasiveness, lack of radiation exposure, and high in vitro diagnostic accuracy warrant further investigation of this novel concept.

Colonic Polyps↗

PubMed2003

Screening for Barrett's esophagus in colonoscopy patients with and without heartburn.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The population prevalence of Barrett's esophagus (BE) is uncertain. Our aim was to describe the prevalence of BE in a volunteer population. METHODS: Upper endoscopy (EGD) was performed in 961 persons with no prior history of EGD who were scheduled for colonoscopy. Symptom questionnaires were completed prior to endoscopy. Biopsy specimens were taken from the gastric cardia and any columnar mucosa extending > or =5 mm into the tubular esophagus and from the stomach for H. pylori infection in the last 812 patients. RESULTS: The study sample was biased toward persons undergoing colonoscopy, males, and persons with upper GI symptoms. The prevalence of BE was 65 of 961 (6.8%) patients, including 12 (1.2%) with long-segment BE (LSBE). Among 556 subjects who had never had heartburn, the prevalences of BE and LSBE were 5.6% and 0.36%, respectively. Among 384 subjects with a history of any heartburn, the prevalences of BE and LSBE were 8.3% and 2.6%, respectively. In a univariate analysis, LSBE was more common in those with any heartburn vs. those with no heartburn (P = 0.01), but the sample size was insufficient to allow multivariate analysis of predictors of LSBE. In a multivariate analysis, BE was associated with increasing age (P = 0.02), white race (P = 0.03), and negative H. pylori status (P = 0.04). Overall, BE was not associated with heartburn, although heartburn was more common in persons with LSBE or circumferential short segments. CONCLUSIONS: LSBE is very uncommon in patients who have no history of heartburn. SSBE is relatively common in persons age > or =40 years with no prior endoscopy, irrespective of heartburn history.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Prospective results of surveillance colonoscopy in dominant familial colorectal cancer with and without Lynch syndrome.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominant predisposition to colorectal cancer caused by mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes; colorectal cancer risk is high. Few studies have addressed colorectal cancer risk in individuals from dominant families without mismatch repair deficiency. We sought to establish whether these individuals are also at increased risk by examining the incidence of advanced neoplasia during surveillance. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, BAT26 testing of tumors was carried out at 2 tertiary centers on 125 individuals from 97 families (with a dominant colorectal cancer history) to classify families as Lynch syndrome (microsatellite unstable) or non-Lynch syndrome (microsatellite stable). Colonoscopy results in 288 at-risk family members were compared. RESULTS: Twenty-nine families were classified as Lynch syndrome and 68 as non-Lynch syndrome. Seven hundred seventy-six colonoscopies were undertaken. High-risk adenomas occurred in 7 of 91 (7.7%) Lynch syndrome individuals and 15 of 197 (7.6%) non-Lynch syndrome individuals, adjusted relative risk 1.15 (95% CI: 0.6-2.3). Cancer was observed only in Lynch syndrome individuals (4/91; 4.4%), Fisher exact test, P = .010. Multiple adenomas were only seen in non-Lynch syndrome individuals (13/197; 6.6%), Fisher exact text, P = .06. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with an autosomal dominant family history of colorectal cancer with and without evidence of Lynch syndrome are at equal risk of high-risk adenomas during surveillance, but colorectal cancer was only seen in Lynch syndrome. Therefore non-Lynch syndrome individuals do require colonoscopic surveillance, but the interval could be lengthened because risk of (interval) cancer is low. Lynch syndrome individuals require short surveillance intervals as is the recommended practice.

Age Distribution↗

PubMed1999

Diagnosis and hazards of unexpected diaphragmatic hernias during colonoscopy: report of two cases.

Two cases of diaphragmatic hernias are reported. Both cases were previously undiagnosed and were found during diagnostic colonoscopy. In one case sudden respiratory distress occurred during the endoscopic procedure owing to a barotraumatic perforation in a left-sided hernia with tension pneumothorax. The diagnoses were made by fluoroscopy without delay. Endoscopists should be aware of the possible occurrence of diaphragmatic hernias and their risk as life-threatening complications. To avoid such dangerous complications access to X-ray facilities with fluoroscopy is recommended in endoscopic units where colonoscopies are performed.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Prediction of the clinical course of Behçet's colitis according to macroscopic classification by colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The lesions in Behçet's colitis show aphthoid or punched-out ulceration, but the macroscopic types of lesion found have not been defined. To predict the clinical outcome in patients with Behçet's colitis according to the colonoscopic findings, we classified the characteristic colonic ulcers, evaluated the efficacy of medical treatment on colonoscopic lesions, and calculated the operation rates and recurrence rates relative to the macroscopic types. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records and colonoscopic photographs of 50 patients with Behçet's colitis were reviewed. The colonic lesions were examined by colonoscopy in patients with Behçet's disease and gastrointestinal symptoms. The colonoscopic findings were categorized into three types of ulceration: volcano-like, geographic, and aphthous. The efficacy of medical treatment was assessed by follow-up colonoscopy or double-contrast barium enema four to eight weeks after treatment, and recurrence of the lesions was evaluated during the follow-up periods. Cumulative surgery rates were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The macroscopic classification of colonic ulcers identified 25 of 50 patients (50%) with volcano-type lesions, 11 (22%) with the geographic type, and 14 (28%) with the aphthous type. The rates of complete remission after medical treatment and surgery, respectively, were six of 25 (24%) and 13 of 25 (52%) with volcano-type ulcerations; eight of 11 (73%) and one of 11 (9%) with the geographic type; and nine of 14 (64%) and two of 14 (14%) with the aphthous type. The endoscopic and clinical recurrence rates were nine of 19 (47%) in volcano-type ulcerations, one of nine (11%) in the geographic type, and one of 11 (9%) in the aphthous type. CONCLUSION: Volcano-type ulcerations in Behçet's colitis showed a less favorable response to medical treatment, a more frequent requirement for surgery, and more frequent recurrences than the geographic and aphthous types of ulcerations.

Adult↗