PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Angiography, Digital Subtraction”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Comparison of multislice computerized tomography angiography and digital subtraction angiography in the postoperative evaluation of patients with clipped aneurysms.

OBJECT: In this study the accuracy of multislice computerized tomography (MSCT) angiography in the postoperative examination of clip-occluded intracranial aneurysms was compared with that of intraarterial digital subtraction (DS) angiography METHODS: Forty-nine consecutive patients with 60 clipped aneurysms (41 of which had ruptured) were studied with the aid of postoperative MSCT and DS angiography. Both types of radiological studies were reviewed independently by two observers to assess the quality of the images, the artifacts left by the clips, the completeness of aneurysm occlusion, the patency of the parent vessel, and the duration and cost of the examination. The quality of MSCT angiography was good in 42 patients (86%). Poor-quality MSCT angiograms (14%) were a result of the late acquisition of images in three patients and the presence of clip or motion artifacts in four. Occlusion of the aneurysm on good-quality MSCT angiograms was confirmed in all but two patients in whom a small (2-mm) remnant was confirmed on DS angiograms. In one patient, occlusion of a parent vessel was seen on DS angiograms but missed on MSCT angiograms. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting neck remnants on MSCT angiography were both 100%, and the sensitivity and specificity for evaluating vessel patency were 80 and 100%, respectively (95% confidence interval 29.2-100%). Interobserver agreements were 0.765 and 0.86, respectively. The mean duration of the examination was 13 minutes for MSCT angiography and 75 minutes for DS angiography (p < 0.05). Multislice CT angiography was highly cost effective (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Current-generation MSCT angiography is an accurate noninvasive tool used for assessment of clipped aneurysms in the anterior circulation. Its high sensitivity and low cost warrant its use for postoperative routine control examinations following clip placement on an aneurysm. Digital subtraction angiography must be performed if the interpretation of MSCT angiograms is doubtful or if the aneurysm is located in the posterior circulation.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction↗
PubMed2003

[Evaluation of the lower leg vessels before microsurgical fibula transfer. Magnetic resonance angiography versus digital subtraction angiography].

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of the fibula flap by Taylor in 1975, and its first application in the lower jaw by Hidalgo in 1989, it has become an option of first choice in mandibular reconstruction of large oromandibular defects. Perfusion of the osteomyocutaneous fibula transplant is based on the peroneal artery. To avoid postoperative ischaemia of the lower leg after sacrificing this artery, especially in smokers, adequate perfusion must be guaranteed preoperatively by radiological evaluation. Progress in the field of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) enables an increasing number of primary non-invasive evaluations of vessels. The aim of this prospective study was to answer the question of whether MRA enables a accurate representation of anatomical variation and pathological stenoses of the lower leg vessels and can therefore replace conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out conventional DSA of the lower leg before raising a fibula transplant and postoperative MRA with contrast medium in a prospective study with 15 patients. Vessels were assessed for atherosclerotic, occlusive or hypoplastic changes and anatomical variations by three radiologists. RESULTS: High resolution of MRA enables a reliable judgement of the lower leg vessels. Hypoplastic vessels, stenoses, occlusion or atherosclerotic changes of the vessels could definitely be detected by MRA just as by DSA. Thus, all patients without these diagnosed contraindications could be operated successfully. CONCLUSION: MRA of the lower leg enables a definitive determination of the vessel quality and the site of preference for harvesting the flap. Because MRA is a low risk procedure, can be carried out on an outpatient basis and causes no radiation load, it should be preferred to conventional DSA.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Operative angiography by intraarterial digital subtraction angiography: a new technique for quality control of carotid endarterectomy.

Fifty patients who had carotid bifurcation endarterectomy as their sole surgical procedure underwent intraoperative completion angiography by means of portable intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. All had subsequent intravenous digital subtraction angiography or duplex scanning during early follow-up. After the endarterectomy site was closed and before the wound was closed, 6 to 8 ml of contrast was injected through a 21-gauge needle while fluoroscopy was performed with a conventional C-arm. The C-arm was coupled to a Quantel IDIS Mobile Digital Subtraction Angiogram Unit (Quantel Medical Products Group, Clemmons, N.C.) for image enhancement and immediate playback. There were no postoperative deaths or neurologic complications. Abnormal radiographic results led to reopening of endarterectomy sites in eight patients, which resulted in successful correction of the defects. There was a single asymptomatic occlusion of the internal carotid artery at 3 weeks in the patient with the only false-negative result on the completion study. Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography is a safe and useful technique for intraoperative quality control of carotid endarterectomy. It provides visual images that can be easily repeated in several projections, uses small volumes of contrast, and has no timing requirements for filming and injecting.

Carotid Artery Diseases↗
PubMed2005

Intra-venous digital subtraction angiography: an alternative method to intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for experimental aneurysm imaging.

Conventional intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA), which necessitates surgical exposure and ligation of the femoral artery, is an invasive and expensive method of evaluation for experimental elastase-induced aneurysms in rabbits. The purpose of this study was to examine and validate intra-venous digital subtraction angiography (IVDSA) as an alternative to IADSA by comparing their diagnostic accuracies. We performed both IVDSA and IADSA for 24 elastase-induced saccular aneurysms in a rabbit model, 1 month following creation. Aneurysm sizes (neck, width and height) from both the IVDSA and IADSA procedures were evaluated and measured. Comparison of the aneurysm sizes between IVDSA and IADSA were performed with the Wilcoxon paired signed-rank test. All the aneurysms were seen clearly in both the IVDSA and IADSA techniques. Mean sizes of the IVDSA aneurysm neck, width and height were 3.41 +/- 0.80 mm, 3.61 +/- 0.93 mm and 8.07 +/- 2.11 mm, respectively. Mean sizes of the IADSA aneurysm neck, width and height were 3.43 +/- 0.80 mm, 3.66 +/- 0.92 mm and 8.16 +/- 2.25 mm, respectively. No significant difference was found in the sizes of the aneurysm neck, width and height between the two groups (P = 0.311, P = 0.086 and P = 0.258, respectively). IVDSA appears to be an alternative method for evaluating elastase-induced aneurysms in rabbits.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction↗
PubMed2004

Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: evaluation with combined 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and MR digital subtraction angiography.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic utility of 3D time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography and MR digital subtraction angiography in patients with angiographically proven moderate- to high-flow intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two neuroradiologists, unaware of patients' histories and angiographic findings, retrospectively reviewed 17 MR angiograms with 3D TOF MR angiography and MR digital subtraction angiography in 15 patients with dural arteriovenous fistula and also reviewed 35 MR angiograms in control patients without findings of dural arteriovenous fistula on angiography. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: In patients with dural arteriovenous fistula, source images of 3D TOF MR angiography showed two abnormal findings: multiple high-intensity curvilinear or nodular structures adjacent to the sinus wall and high-intensity areas in the venous sinus. Findings of multiple high-intensity structures adjacent to the sinus wall were observed in all cases of dural arteriovenous fistula. Findings of high-intensity areas in the venous sinus were observed in 13 of 17 cases of dural arteriovenous fistula. Findings of multiple high-intensity structures adjacent to the sinus wall were not observed in any control subjects. Findings of high-intensity areas within the venous sinus were observed in five of 35 control subjects. Findings of MR digital subtraction angiography showed early filling of the venous sinus, suggestive of dural arteriovenous fistula, in 13 of 15 patients with dural arteriovenous fistula. Sensitivity and specificity of multiple high-intensity structures adjacent to the sinus wall, high-intensity areas in the venous sinus, and early filling of the venous sinus were 100% and 100%, 76% and 86%, and 87% and 100%, respectively. Although 3D TOF MR angiography failed to show the findings of retrograde cortical venous drainage and venous sinus occlusion, MR digital subtraction angiography clearly showed both findings in all five subjects. CONCLUSION: A protocol including both 3D TOF MR angiography (source images) and MR digital subtraction angiography allowed the diagnosis of moderate- to high-flow dural arteriovenous fistula. In addition, cortical venous drainage was reliably noted in a small subset of patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the reference standard for assessing carotid arteries, it is uncomfortable for patients and has a small risk of disabling stroke and death. These problems have fueled the use of spiral CT angiography and MR angiography. We prospectively compared elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography with conventional DSA for detecting carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: Eighty carotid arteries (in 40 symptomatic patients) were assessed. Elliptic centric MR and spiral CT angiographic data were reconstructed with maximum intensity projection and multiplanar reconstruction techniques. All patients had been referred for DSA evaluation on the basis of findings at Doppler sonography, which served as a screening method (degree of stenosis > or = 70% or inconclusive results). Degree of carotid stenosis estimated by using the three modalities was compared. RESULTS: Significant correlation with DSA was found for stenosis degree for both elliptic centric MR and spiral CT angiography; however, the correlation coefficient was higher for MR than for CT angiography (r = 0.98 vs r = 0.86). Underestimation of stenoses of 70-99% occurred in one case with elliptic centric MR angiography (a 70% stenosis was underestimated as 65%) and in nine cases with spiral CT angiography, in comparison to DSA findings. Overestimation occurred in two cases with MR angiography (stenoses of 65-67% were overestimated as 70-75%). With CT, overestimation occurred in seven cases; a stenosis of 60% in one case was overestimated as 70%. Both techniques confirmed the three cases of carotid occlusion. With elliptic centric MR angiography, carotid stenoses of 70% or greater were detected with high sensitivity, 97.1%; specificity, 95.2%; likelihood ratio (LR) for a positive test result, 20.4; and ratio of LR(+) to LR(-), -0.3. With spiral CT angiography, sensitivity, specificity, LR(+), and LR(+):LR(-) were 74.3%, 97.6%, 31.2, and 0.3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography is more accurate than spiral CT angiography to adequately evaluate carotid stenosis. Furthermore, elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography appears to be adequate to replace conventional DSA in most patients examined.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of duplex scan and magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography.

OBJECTIVE: We compare duplex scan (DS) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with digital angiography (DGA) in respect to accuracy in measuring internal carotid artery (IC) stenosis in symptomatic patients. METHOD: Ten symptomatic patients with IC stenosis greater than 70% previously diagnosed by DS were submitted to another DS and to both MRA and DGA. Both ICs from each patient (total 20 ICs) were evaluated by physicians blinded for the results of other tests. DS and MRA were compared with DGA, using the intraclass correlation coefficient (r) and its 95% confidence interval (95% ci). For each diagnostic test, the study group (20 Ics) was also divided in surgical patients (IC stenosis between 70 and 99%) and non surgical patients, using kappa concordance coefficient (k) to compare the results. RESULTS: Main comparisons are: DS and DGA, r = 0.71 (0.4 - 0.87); MRA and DGA, r = 0.61 (0.25 - 0.82). After division into surgical vs. non-surgical groups, k = 0.857 (p < 0.0001) between DS and DGA; and k = 0.545 (p = 0.003) between MRA and DGA. Most DS and MRA errors occurred in IC sub-occlusions. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that when they are used together, DS and non-contrast MRA may substitute DGA in the evaluation of patients for IC stenosis surgery, except when there is discordance between their results or when the methods show sub-occlusive stenosis.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Detection of thrombosis in the portal venous system: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.

PURPOSE: To determine whether intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) can be replaced by contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the assessment of patency or thrombosis of the portal venous system in patients with portal hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with portal hypertension underwent contrast-enhanced MR angiography and intraarterial DSA for assessment of the portal venous system. The images were evaluated for vessel patency or thrombosis of the portal, splenic, or superior mesenteric vein. RESULTS: Of the 101 vessels evaluated, 42 were thrombosed. Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the detection of thrombosis were 100%, 98%, and 99%, respectively, for MR angiography and 91%, 100%, and 96%, respectively, for DSA; differences between the imaging methods were not statistically significant. Only in four patients with six vessels (6%) were there discordant findings between MR angiography and DSA. CONCLUSION: Noninvasive contrast-enhanced MR angiography has the potential to replace intraarterial DSA as the standard method to assess the whole portal venous system.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Multi-section CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in diagnosing major arterial hemorrhage in inflammatory pancreatic disease.

PURPOSE: Major arterial hemorrhage is an uncommon but serious complication of pancreatitis with high morbidity and mortality. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has long been the gold standard for the detection of a visceral artery pseudoaneurysm or for the site of active bleeding in patients with pancreatitis. Multi-section CT angiography is a minimally invasive technique which can provide high-resolution and high-contrast images of the arterial lumen and wall, with a much lower risk of complication and morbidity compared to DSA. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of multi-section CT angiography for the diagnosis of arterial complications of inflammatory pancreatitic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing visceral angiography for major bleeding as a complication of pancreatitis between 1998 and 2004 was performed. Twenty-nine studies in 25 patients (20 males, 5 females) with a mean age of 50.9 years (range 11-67 years) were identified where multi-section CT angiography was performed in the 24 h preceding the digital subtraction angiogram. RESULTS: Digital subtraction angiography detected a pseudoaneurysm or contrast extravasation in 19 studies and no bleeding was demonstrated in 9 studies. CT angiography correctly identified the site and type of bleeding in 18 of the 19 positive studies. CT angiography detected extravasation of contrast in one study that was not demonstrated on digital subtraction angiography. The sensitivity and specificity for multi-section CT angiography for the detection of major arterial bleeding on a background of pancreatitis were 0.947 and 0.900, respectively. CONCLUSION: Multi-section CT angiography is a sensitive and accurate technique for the detection of major arterial hemorrhage in inflammatory pancreatic disease and should be considered as the first investigation in the management of these patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography for visualization of lower extremity arteries.

Objective vascular assessment is frequently required before microvascular reconstruction involving the lower extremities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for preoperative assessment before free flap surgery. Five patients underwent preoperative MRA: one before fibula harvest for oromandibular reconstruction, and four before muscle free flap reconstruction of the lower extremity. In all patients, the tibioperoneal trunk, anterior tibial, posterior tibial, and peroneal arteries were well visualized to the ankle, including pathological occlusions. The radiographic findings were demonstrated at surgery and were confirmed to be accurate. These findings facilitated and guided the surgical procedure. This study strongly suggests the accuracy and surgical relevance of MRA before free flap surgery. MRA is desirable over angiography because of its noninvasive nature. It may also be better than ultrasonography because the latter is highly dependent on the technician (particularly in identifying the peroneal artery). MRA may likely replace angiography as the objective procedure of choice before microvascular surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

[Transvenous digital subtraction angiography for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis in arterial hypertension. A comparison with conventional angiography].

Venous digital subtraction angiography was performed in 248 patients for the diagnosis of renal arterial stenosis. In 88% of the investigations the digital subtraction angiograms were of diagnostic value. Comparison of digital angiography and conventional angiography was made for 57 renal arteries (25 investigations). In 52 renal arteries we found the same results with both methods, in 5 renal arteries the digital angiography showed false positive results. The spatial resolution of digital subtraction angiography is sufficient for the correct diagnosis of significant renal arterial stenosis. With regard to the lower invasion of digital subtraction angiography compared to conventional angiography the first method should be used for clarification of renal arterial hypertension.

Angiography↗
PubMed2006

Assessment of blood supply to intracranial pathologies in children using MR digital subtraction angiography.

BACKGROUND: MR digital subtraction angiography (MR-DSA) is a contrast-enhanced MR angiographic sequence that enables time-resolved evaluation of the cerebral circulation. OBJECTIVE: We describe the feasibility and technical success of our attempts at MR-DSA for the assessment of intracranial pathology in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed MR-DSA in 15 children (age range 5 days to 16 years) referred for MR imaging because of known or suspected intracranial pathology that required a dynamic assessment of the cerebral vasculature. MR-DSA consisted of a thick (6-10 mm) slice-selective RF-spoiled fast gradient-echo sequence (RF-FAST) acquired before and during passage of an intravenously administered bolus of Gd-DTPA. The images were subtracted and viewed as a cine loop. RESULTS: MR-DSA was performed successfully in all patients. High-flow lesions were shown in four patients; these included vein of Galen aneurysmal malformation, dural fistula, and two partially treated arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Low-flow lesions were seen in three patients, all of which were tumours. Normal flow was confirmed in eight patients including two with successfully treated AVMs, and in three patients with cavernomas. CONCLUSION: Our early experience suggests that MR-DSA is a realistic, non-invasive alternative to catheter angiography in certain clinical settings.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Lower extremity angiography: improved image quality and outflow vessel detection with bilaterally antegrade selective digital subtraction angiography. A blinded prospective intraindividual comparison with aortic flush digital subtraction angiography.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To introduce routine bilaterally antegrade selective stationary digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and prospectively compare it with unselective stationary DSA in the detection of calf arteries and assess additional time and complication rate. METHODS: Twenty-five patients received one unselective and two separate antegrade selective studies of each calf. Images were evaluated for image quality, number of depicted run-off vessels, and potential crural bypass recipient arteries. RESULTS: Bilaterally antegrade selective DSA was significantly superior in image quality and motion artifacts (P < 0.01). The number of adequately depicted run-off arteries per calf increased from 79% (2.37 of 3) to 96% (2.89 of 3) for legs with advanced peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Seventy-nine instead of 62 potential bypass recipients were identified (P = 0.002). Mean procedure time needed for selective catheterizations was 7 minutes. No adverse events were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Bilaterally antegrade selective DSA clearly is superior to aortic run-off DSA depicting tibial arteries. It requires comparatively small additional effort. Outflow vessel detection essentially is independent of advanced PVD.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Renal artery stenosis: detection and quantification with spiral CT angiography versus optimized digital subtraction angiography.

PURPOSE: To compare spiral computed tomographic (CT) angiography with optimized digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for accurate detection and quantification of renal artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 71 consecutive patients with possible renovascular hypertension, spiral CT angiography was performed of the renal arteries before DSA. Optimized DSA (performed with projection angles calculated from axial spiral CT source images) was used as the standard. Two independent observers evaluated spinal CT angiograms for the presence and grade of renal artery stenosis. Sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver variability were calculated. RESULTS: With spiral CT angiography, all 166 renal arteries and accessory arteries were identified correctly by both reviewers. Overall sensitivity and specificity for assessment of stenoses of grade 0 (none), grade 1 (1%-49%), grade 2 (51%-99%), and grade 3 (occlusion) were 97% and 100%, 92% and 98%, 96% and 96%, and 100% and 100%, respectively. Agreement was strong between spiral CT angiographic and DSA findings in assessment of all grades of stenosis (kappa coefficient, 0.9 and 0.9, respectively) for the two observers. CONCLUSION: Spiral CT angiography enabled accurate assessment of renal artery stenosis in patients with possible renovascular hypertension and may assist in selecting patients for interventional treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm for stent-graft placement: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus helical CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography.

PURPOSE: To determine whether magnetic resonance (MR) angiography can be used alone to evaluate abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) for endovascular placement of stent grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients with AAAs underwent gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and pelvic arteries. Measurements of the size and extent of the AAAs were compared with helical computed tomographic (CT) and digital subtraction angiographic measurements; 95% confidence intervals for the differences in the means were determined. RESULTS: Because of the larger field of view, MR angiography was superior to CT angiography in assessing visceral iliac artery disease. Both modalities were equal in evaluating the proximal extent of the AAA (mean difference, -0.16 mm; 95% CI, -0.31, 0.64) and in measuring all aortic dimensions (e.g., mean difference in the proximal neck diameter, -0.74 mm; 95% CI, -0.98, -0.49). MR angiography was inferior to CT angiography in depicting accessory renal arteries (seven of 12) and in grading renal artery stenoses (sensitivity, 100% [95% CI, 0.90, 1.00]; specificity, 84% [95% CI, 0.74, 0.91]). CONCLUSION: Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography is a fast, reliable means of providing all the information relevant to the preoperative assessment of endovascular aortic stent-graft placement.

Adult↗