SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Cannabinoids”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

PubMed1999

The third transmembrane helix of the cannabinoid receptor plays a role in the selectivity of aminoalkylindoles for CB2, peripheral cannabinoid receptor.

Two subtypes of the human cannabinoid receptor have been identified. The CB1 receptor is primarily distributed in the central nervous system, whereas the CB2 receptor is associated with peripheral tissue, including the spleen. These two subtypes are also distinguished by their ligand-binding profiles. The goal of this study was to identify critical residues in transmembrane region III (TM3) of the receptors that contribute to subtype specificity in ligand binding. For this purpose, a chimeric cannabinoid receptor [CB1/2(TM3)] was generated in which the TM3 of CB1 was replaced with the corresponding region of CB2. These receptors were stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells for evaluation. The binding affinities of CB1/2(TM3) and the wild-type CB1 receptor to several prototype ligands were similar with one notable exception: the chimeric receptor exhibited a 4-fold enhancement in binding affinity to WIN 55,212-2 (K(d) = 4.8 nM) relative to that observed with CB1 (K(d) = 21.7 nM). Two additional aminoalkylindoles, JWH 015 and JWH 018, also bound the chimeric receptor (K(i) = 1.0 microM and 1.4 nM, respectively) with higher affinity compared with the wild-type CB1 (K(i) = 5.2 microM and 9.8 nM, respectively). Furthermore, the increase in binding affinities of the aminoalkylindoles were reflected in the EC(50) values for the ligand-induced inhibition of intracellular cAMP levels mediated by the chimeric receptor. This pattern mirrors the selectivity of WIN 55,212-2 binding to CB2 compared with CB1. Site-specific mutagenesis of the most notable amino acid changes in the chimeric receptor, Gly195 to Ser and Ala198 to Met, revealed that the enhancement in WIN 55,212-2 binding is contributed to by the Ser but not by the Met residue. The data indicate that the amino acid differences in TM3 between CB1 and CB2 play a critical role in subtype selectivity for this class of compounds.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Cannabinoid agonist signal transduction in rat brain: comparison of cannabinoid agonists in receptor binding, G-protein activation, and adenylyl cyclase inhibition.

To investigate differences in agonist affinity, potency, and efficacy across rat brain regions, five representative cannabinoid compounds were investigated in membranes from three different rat brain regions for their ability to maximally stimulate [(35)S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) binding and bind to cannabinoid receptors (measured by inhibition of [(3)H]antagonist binding) under identical assay conditions. In all three brain regions, the rank order of potency for the stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding and the inhibition of [(3)H]SR141716A binding for these compounds were identical, with CP55940 approximately levonantradol > WIN55212-2 >/= Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) > methanandamide. The rank order of efficacy was not related to potency, and relative maximal agonist effects varied across regions. Receptor binding fit to a three-site model for most agonists, stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding fit to a two-site model for all agonists, and high-affinity receptor binding did not appear to produce any stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. WIN55212-2, methanandamide, and Delta(9)-THC also were assayed for the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase in cerebellar membranes. The rank orders of potency and efficacy were similar to those for [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding, but the efficacies and potencies of methanandamide and Delta(9)-THC compared with WIN55212-2 were higher for adenylyl cyclase inhibition, implying receptor/G-protein reserve.

Adenylyl Cyclase Inhibitors↗

PubMed2005

Evidence that the plant cannabinoid Delta9-tetrahydrocannabivarin is a cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor antagonist.

Delta9-tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV) displaced [(3)H]CP55940 from specific binding sites on mouse brain and CHO-hCB(2) cell membranes (K(i)=75.4 and 62.8 nM, respectively).THCV (1 microM) also antagonized CP55940-induced stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to these membranes (apparent K(B)=93.1 and 10.1 nM, respectively). In the mouse vas deferens, the ability of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to inhibit electrically evoked contractions was antagonized by THCV, its apparent K(B)-value (96.7 nM) approximating the apparent K(B)-values for its antagonism of CP55940- and R-(+)-WIN55212-induced stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to mouse brain membranes. THCV also antagonized R-(+)-WIN55212, anandamide, methanandamide and CP55940 in the vas deferens, but with lower apparent K(B)-values (1.5, 1.2, 4.6 and 10.3 nM, respectively).THCV (100 nM) did not oppose clonidine, capsaicin or (-)-7-hydroxy-cannabidiol-dimethylheptyl-induced inhibition of electrically evoked contractions of the vas deferens. Contractile responses of the vas deferens to phenylephrine hydrochloride or beta,gamma-methylene-ATP were not reduced by 1microM THCV or R-(+)-WIN55212, suggesting that THCV interacts with R-(+)-WIN55212 at prejunctional sites. At 32 microM, THCV did reduce contractile responses to phenylephrine hydrochloride and beta,gamma-methylene-ATP, and above 3 microM it inhibited electrically evoked contractions of the vas deferens in an SR141716A-independent manner. In conclusion, THCV behaves as a competitive CB(1) and CB(2) receptor antagonist. In the vas deferens, it antagonized several cannabinoids more potently than THC and was also more potent against CP55940 and R-(+)-WIN55212 in this tissue than in brain membranes. The bases of these agonist- and tissue-dependent effects remain to be established.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Transcriptional regulation of the cannabinoid receptor type 1 gene in T cells by cannabinoids.

Effects of cannabinoids (CBs) are mediated by two types of receptors, CB1 and CB2. In this report, we investigated whether CBs regulate gene expression of their cognate receptors in T cells and studied underlying mechanisms in CD4+ Jurkat T cells. Transcription of the CB1 gene was strongly induced in response to Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), whereas the CB2 gene was not regulated. The induction of CB1 gene expression is mediated by CB2 receptors only, as demonstrated by using the CB1 and CB2 agonists R(+)-methanandamide and JWH 015, respectively, and combinations of THC plus CB1- and CB2-specific antagonists. After activation of CB2 receptors, the transcription factor STAT5 is phosphorylated. STAT5 then transactivates IL-4. Induction of IL-4 mRNA as well as IL-4 protein release from the cells are necessary for the following induction of the CB1 gene. This was demonstrated by using decoy oligonucleotides against STAT5, which blocked IL-4 and CB1 mRNA induction, and by using the IL-4 receptor antagonist IL-4 [R121D,Y124D], which blocked the up-regulation of CB1 gene transcription. Transactivation of the CB1 gene in response to IL-4 is then mediated by the transcription factor STAT6, as shown by using decoy oligonucleotides against STAT6. An increase in CB1-mediated phosphorylation of MAPK in cells prestimulated with CB2-specific agonists suggests up-regulation of functional CB1 receptor proteins. In summary, up-regulation of CB1 in T lymphocytes in response to CBs themselves may facilitate or enhance the various immunomodulatory effects related to CBs.

Cannabinoids↗

PubMed2000

The cannabinoid agonist HU 210 modifies rat behavioural responses to novelty and stress.

Experiments were performed on groups of rats after acute and sub-chronic treatment (once daily for 9 days) with the cannabinoid agonist HU 210 (25-100 microg kg(-1), i.p.) as well as 24 h and 7 days after the last drug injection. The animals underwent three behavioural tests in novel environments. In the observation cages (Test 1), rat locomotor activity was found to be dose-dependently reduced after acute and sub-chronic treatment at all doses and virtually unchanged during abstinence; grooming was potently inhibited by acute treatment but potentiated by the sub-chronic one at doses of 50 and 100 microg kg(-1), the effect of the higher dose persisting after 24 h and 7 days abstinence. Vocalization in animals in response to a tactile stimulus was highest after HU 210 at 100 microg kg(-1) in all experimental modes except after 7 days abstinence. In the X-maze (Test 2), sub-chronic HU 210 dose- dependently enhanced rat natural aversion for open arms, and this behaviour persisted during abstinence after the highest dose. Grooming in the X-maze was completely absent in rats acutely injected with HU 210 but potentiated in those sub-chronically treated or abstinent. In the swimming test (Test 3) rats sub-chronically treated at 50 and 100 pg kg(-1) displayed relevant wall-hugging and the same occurred 24 h after last injection. On the whole, our results are indicative of an anxiogenic-like effect of sub-chronic HU 210 at high doses and reflect the persistence of enhanced emotional response to novel environments when the treatment is discontinued.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Structural modifications of the cannabinoid side chain towards C3-aryl and 1',1'-cycloalkyl-1'-cyano cannabinoids.

The compounds reported in this study are Delta(8)-THC analogues in which the C3 five-carbon linear side chain of Delta(8)-THC was replaced with aryl and 1',1'-cycloalkyl substituents. Of the compounds described here analogues 2d (CB(1), K(i)=11.7 nM. CB(2), K(i)=9.39 nM) and 2f (CB(1), K(i)=8.26 nM. CB(2), K(i)=3.86 nM) exhibited enhanced binding affinities for CB(1) and CB(2), exceeding that of Delta(8)-THC. Efficient procedures for the synthesis of these novel cannabinoid analogues are described.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Towards a cannabinoid hypothesis of schizophrenia: cognitive impairments due to dysregulation of the endogenous cannabinoid system.

Cognitive impairments during psychotic episodes are assumed to be caused not only by one single putative classical neurotransmitter dysfunction but also by an impaired equilibrium of the interaction between different neurobiological generators of cognitive processes. Herein, the perceptual abnormalities induced by psychotogenic agents play a major role as tools for the understanding of model psychoses. The recently discovered cannabinoid receptor system with its endogenous ligand anandamide can be regarded as an extremely relevant regulator system, a dysfunctionality of which may explain at least one subtype of endogenous psychoses. Neuropsychological results (three-dimensional inversion illusion) in delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol-intoxicated normal volunteers exhibit strong similarities with data acquired from patients suffering from productive schizophrenic psychoses, regarding disturbances in internal regulation of perceptual processes. The relevance of this finding to a general cognitive dysfunction concept of schizophrenic psychosis is discussed.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Cannabinoid precipitated withdrawal by the selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist, SR 141716A.

Precipitated withdrawal in rats chronically exposed to delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the major psychoactive principle of the marijuana plant, was unequivocally demonstrated for the first time using a selective antagonist, SR 141716A (N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1(2,4- dichloro-phenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole carboxamide.HCl). This demonstration should provide a powerful stimulus for the systematic study of dependency on the psychoactive cannabinoids.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

The cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR-141716 does not readily antagonize open-field effects induced by the cannabinoid receptor agonist (R)-methanandamide in rats.

This study examined the effects of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonist (R)-methanandamide and the CB(1) receptor antagonist SR-141716 on open-field behaviors in rats. Animals were examined after administration of (R)-methanandamide (dose range 10 to 30 mg/kg) plus vehicle, and the two drugs in combination; the dose range of SR-141716 was 0.3 to 5.6 mg/kg. Injections were given intraperitoneally 20 min prior to initial testing. Additional exposures to the open-field arena occurred for the groups treated with 30 mg/kg (R)-methanandamide at 60 and 120 min post administration. There was a dose-related suppression of ambulation (horizontal activity) and rearing (vertical activity) after (R)-methanandamide administration. Coadministration of SR-141716 did not counteract the suppression induced by 10 and 18 mg/kg (R)-methanandamide but rather tended to augment it, especially with regard to ambulation using SR-141716 doses of 1 mg/kg and up. The latency to leave the starting area in the center of the field was significantly elevated by 30 mg/kg (R)-methanandamide. This effect was completely blocked by SR-141716. With increasing doses of SR-141716, there was an increase in grooming and scratching. Generally, the strongest effects occurred 20 min post administration with the exception of grooming, which reached maximum at 60 min post. Differences in the number of circlings, vocalizations, urination, and defecation generally did not differ clearly among treatments. These results coupled with previous open-field data examining combinations of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) and SR-141716 [Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 73 (2002) 911] underscore pharmacological differences between (R)-methanandamide and Delta(9)-THC revealed by their interactions with SR-141716.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Exposure to cannabinoids in the development of endogenous cannabinoid system.

New data strengthen the idea of a prominent role for endocannabinoids in the modulation of a wide variety of neurobiological functions. Among these, two functions, control of movement and antinociception, have attracted the maximal interest because of the possibility that cannabinoids and related compounds might be used with a therapeutic purpose. However, the functions of endocannabinoids in the brain, and also in the periphery, are large and involve, not only the adulthood, but also the period of prenatal and postnatal development, when endocannabinoids have been reported to be significantly present and to play a role in processes of brain development as neuronal proliferation and migration, axonal elongation, synaptogenesis and/or myelinogenesis. The present review article will summarize the different studies carried out on this topic and will suggest future lines of research to clarify the role of endocannabinoids and their receptors in the development.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2006

Evaluation of the in vivo receptor occupancy for the behavioral effects of cannabinoids using a radiolabeled cannabinoid receptor agonist, R-[125/131I]AM2233.

G-protein coupled receptors exist in both high and low agonist affinity conformations, with tracer levels of agonist radioligands preferentially binding to the former. The goal of the present study was to characterize the in vivo binding of the aminoalkyindole-based, CB1 receptor agonist, R-[125/131I]AM2233 ((2-[125/131I]iodo-phenyl)-[1-(1-methyl-piperidin-2-yl-methyl)-1H-indol-3-yl]-methanone), and to use this radiotracer to selectively measure the receptor occupancy by the related CB1 receptor agonist, WIN55212-2, to the agonist-preferring affinity state of the receptor. In mouse locomotor assays, both WIN55212-2 and AM2233 (racemic) produced an approximately 60% reduction in activity at 1 mg/kg, (i.v.) and completely inhibited activity at 3 mg/kg, confirming their agonist nature. In ex vivo autoradiography, preferential uptake of R-[131I]AM2233 was apparent in CB1 receptor-rich areas, including globus pallidus, substantia nigra, striatum, cerebellum, and hippocampus. Overall brain uptake of R-[131I]AM2233 was 1.3% injected activity/g at 5 min in mice. Coinjection of 3 mg/kg (i.v.) SR141716A, a CB1 receptor antagonist, with R-[125I]AM2233 inhibited the radiotracer binding almost to nonspecific levels in the striatum, globus pallidus, and substantia nigra, although residual binding to a non-CB1 receptor remained in the hippocampus. In contrast to the effect of SR141716A, coinjection of 10 mg/kg (i.v.) WIN55212-2, a high dose that produced an immediate and profound immobility and catalepsy in the mice, reduced CB1 receptor-specific binding of R-[125I]AM2233 in CB1 receptor-rich areas by only 21-43%. These observations suggest that the behavioral effects of CB1 receptor agonists are manifested with a relatively small fraction of the agonist-preferring affinity state of the receptor occupied.

Animals↗

PubMed1993