SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Colonoscopy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of low-radiation-dose computed tomographic (CT) colonography for detection of colorectal polyps by using two sequential colonoscopies, with the second colonoscopy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was local ethics committee approved, and all patients gave written informed consent. Colonographic images were acquired by using a low-dose multi-detector row CT protocol (effective milliampere-second setting, 10 mAs). Three observers interpreted the CT colonographic data separately and independently by using a two-dimensional technique. Initial conventional colonoscopy was performed by an endoscopist unaware of the CT colonographic findings. Second colonoscopy performed within 2 weeks by a colonoscopist aware of both the CT colonographic and the initial colonoscopic findings served as the reference standard. The sensitivities of CT colonography and initial colonoscopy were calculated on a per-polyp and a per-patient basis. Specificities and positive and negative predictive values also were calculated on a per-patient basis. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients underwent CT colonography and initial conventional colonoscopy on the same day. Per-polyp sensitivities were 62% and 83% for CT colonography and initial colonoscopy, respectively. Sensitivities for detection of polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger were 86% and 84% for CT colonography and initial colonoscopy, respectively. Initial colonoscopy failed to depict 16 polyps, six of which were correctly detected with CT colonography. For identification of patients with polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger, CT colonography and initial colonoscopy, respectively, had sensitivities of 84% and 90%, specificities of 82% and 100%, positive predictive values of 70% and 100%, and negative predictive values of 91% and 95%. CONCLUSION: Low-dose CT colonography compares favorably with colonoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps 6 mm in diameter or larger, with markedly decreased performance for detection of polyps 5 mm in diameter or smaller.

Aged↗

PubMed2000

Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Fecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy are used to screen patients for colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost-effectiveness of fecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. DESIGN: The cost-effectiveness of the three screening strategies was compared by using computer models of a Markov process. In the model, a hypothetical population of 100 000 persons 50 years of age undergoes annual fecal occult blood testing, sigmoidoscopy every 5 years, or colonoscopy every 10 years. Positive results on fecal occult blood testing or adenomatous polyps found during sigmoidoscopy are worked up by using colonoscopy. After polypectomy, colonoscopy is repeated every 3 years until no polyps are found. DATA SOURCES: Transition rates were estimated from U.S. vital statistics and cancer statistics and from published data on the sensitivity, specificity, and efficacy of various screening techniques. Costs of screening and cancer care were estimated from Medicare reimbursement data. TARGET POPULATION: Persons 50 years of age in the general population. TIME HORIZON: The study population was followed annually until death. PERSPECTIVE: Third-party payer. OUTCOME MEASURE: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Compared with colonoscopy, annual screening with fecal occult blood testing costs less but saves fewer life-years. A screening strategy based on flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 or 10 years is less cost-effective than the other two screening methods. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: Screening with fecal occult blood testing is more sensitive to changes in compliance rates, and it becomes easily dominated by colonoscopy under most conditions assuming less than perfect compliance. Other assumptions about the sensitivity and specificity of fecal occult blood testing, screening frequency, efficacy of colonoscopy in preventing cancer, and polyp incidence have a lesser influence on the differences in cost-effectiveness between colonoscopy and fecal occult blood testing. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy represents a cost-effective means of screening for colorectal cancer because it reduces mortality at relatively low incremental costs. Low compliance rates render colonoscopy every 10 years the most cost-effective primary screening strategy for colorectal cancer.

Colonoscopy↗

PubMed2004

[Acceptance of screening colonoscopy for the prevention of colorectal cancer].

BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality in colorectal cancer are on the rise. Colonoscopy and polypectomy helps to decrease the incidence of colorectal cancer by 75%. This is the first analysis acceptance of screening colonoscopies in Poland. AIMS: The study was designed to (1) analyze common reasons for consent or refusal to undergo colonoscopy; (2) review the value of diverse sources of information on colonoscopy; (3) determine whether participation in screening colonoscopy programme was connected with participation in other screening examinations; (4) examine the range of pathologic findings; and (5) detect various pathological findings and their location. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two groups of subjects aged 40-65 years were formed: I--consenting to colonoscopy (n=1000) and II--refusing to undergo the examination (n=200). Subjects aged 40-49 years were included when at least one of their first-degree relatives was previously diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Lack of any sign of cancer was requisite for enrollment. Data was extracted from questionnaires filled before and after the examination. CONCLUSIONS: The most common reason for consent to colonoscopy was prophylaxis, while refusal was usually due to fear of pain. The most convincing sources of information on colonoscopy were the media. Persons who undergo screening tests for other cancers were more inclined to undergo screening colonoscopy as well. Bowel preparation was more difficult and more inconvenient than the examination itself. Screening colonoscopies are valuable because they enable detection of cancer and adenomatous polyps in asymptomatic patients. Rectosigmoidoscopy would fail to disclose the pathology in 20% of our subjects found positive by colonoscopy.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

[Virtual colonoscopy in diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia]

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of virtual colonoscopy in diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. METHODS: Virtual colonoscopy was performed in 29 patients with colorectal neoplasia confirmed by colonoscopy. The results were compared with colonoscopy for each case. RESULTS: Virtual colonoscopy was successfully performed in each patient without any complications. All colorectal carcinomas detected by colonoscopy were identified by virtual colonoscopy. Twenty-five polyps were detected with colonoscopy, whereas only 16 identified by virtual colonoscopy. Compared with the results of colonoscopy, detection rate of polyps greater than 1.0 cm between 0.5 approximate, equals 0.9 cm and less than 0.5 cm in size was 90.0% 62.5% and 28.6% respectively. CONCLUSION: Virtual colonoscopy is fast, minimal invasive and well tolerated. This technique is a valuable clinical method in diagnosis of colorectal cancer and polyps larger than 0.5 cm in size.

Journal Article↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Multidetector CT colonoscopy: evaluation of the perspective-filet view virtual colon dissection technique for the detection of elevated lesions.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to determine the usefulness of a virtual computed tomography colon dissection visualization technique for the detection of polypoid lesions in comparison with conventional virtual colonoscopy analysis and optical colonoscopy. METHODS: Twenty-three patients were evaluated with optical colonoscopy and computed tomography colonoscopy using 16-row MDCT on the same day. CT images were analyzed by the colon dissection workup with unfolded haustra visualization and also using the conventional virtual colonoscopy technique (axial images and endoluminal views). The CT analysis was performed by an experienced radiologist using both viewing methods in a randomized order and blinded to optical colonoscopy results. RESULTS: Optical colonoscopy revealed 35 colonic lesions; 15 < 5 mm, 18 between 5-9 mm and 2 > 9 mm. For conventional virtual colonoscopy analysis the overall sensitivity was 86.67%; for the colon dissection visualization technique, the overall sensitivity was 82.86%. The average reading time for conventional virtual colonoscopy was 15 +/- 3 vs. 8 +/- 2 min for the colon dissection visualization technique. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that there is a significant reduction in the reading time using the colon dissection visualization technique without detriment to the detection rate, that is, competitive to conventional virtual colonoscopy interpretation results.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Colonoscopy in the elderly: low risk, low yield in asymptomatic patients.

PURPOSE: Current colonoscopy guidelines do not address the issue of when to stop performing screening and surveillance colonoscopy in the elderly. We reviewed our experience and results of colonoscopy in patients aged 80 years and older to assess the risks and diagnostic yield in this population. METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively the endoscopic and pathologic reports from consecutive colonoscopies performed on patients aged 80 years and older at a single, high-volume endoscopy center between August 1999 and May 2003. Patient characteristics, indications for examination, findings at colonoscopy, and complications were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of1,199 colonoscopic examinations were performed on 1,112 patients. Average age was 83.1 (range, 80-100) years. Male:female distribution was 1:1.7. Leading exclusive indications for colonoscopy included: polyp surveillance, 227 (19 percent); altered bowel habits, 168 (14 percent); iron-deficiency anemia, 132 (11 percent); and cancer follow-up, 108 (9 percent). Eighty-six examinations (7 percent) were performed solely for an indication of colorectal cancer screening. Twenty-two percent of patients had more than one indication for colonoscopy. Forty-five malignancies were found (3.7 percent). No cancers were found in the screening group, and two malignancies (0.7 percent) were detected in patients undergoing colonoscopy for polyp surveillance. There were eight (0.6 percent) reported major complications. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy can be performed safely in patients aged 80 years and older. However, the diagnostic yield is low, particularly in patients undergoing routine screening or surveillance examinations. Colonoscopy should for the most part be limited to elderly patients with symptoms or specific clinical findings.

Adenoma↗

PubMed2006

Evaluation of an intervention to increase screening colonoscopy in an urban public hospital setting.

Only 50% of New Yorkers aged 50 and over reported ever being screened for colorectal cancer by any modality according to a recent household survey. The objective of this investigation was to assess the impact of a hospital-based intervention aimed at eliminating health care system barriers to timely colorectal cancer screening at Lincoln Medical Center, a large, urban public hospital in one of the nation's poorest census tracts. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all colonoscopies performed over an 11-month period, during which a multi-pronged intervention to increase the number of screening colonoscopies took place. Two "patient navigators" were hired during the study period to provide continuity for colonoscopy patients. A Direct Endoscopic Referral System (DERS) was also implemented. Enhancements to the gastrointestinal (GI) suite were also made to improve operational efficiency. Immediately following the introduction of the patient navigators, there was a dramatic and sustained decline in the broken appointment rates for both screening and diagnostic colonoscopy (from 67% in May of 2003 to 5% in June of 2003). The likelihood of keeping the appointment for colonoscopy after the patient navigator intervention increased by nearly 3-fold (relative risk = 2.6, 95% CI 2.2-3.0). The rate of screening colonoscopies increased from 56.8 per month to 119 per month. The screening colonoscopy coverage provided by this facility among persons aged 50 and over in surrounding Zip codes increased from 5.2 to 15.6% (RR 3.0, 95% CI 1.9-4.7). Efforts to increase the number of screening colonoscopies were highly successful, due in large part to the influence of patient navigators, a streamlined referral system, and GI suite enhancements. These findings suggest that there are significant health-care system barriers to colonoscopy that, when addressed, could have a significant impact on screening colonoscopy rates in the general population.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for colonoscopy in adults.

BACKGROUND: There are few published data on how different types of colonoscopes affect success in reaching the cecum and patient comfort. We examined the feasibility of using a pediatric colonoscope for routine colonoscopy in adults and investigated whether there were subgroups of patients in whom use of this instrument was preferable. METHODS: One-hundred fifty adults undergoing outpatient colonoscopy were randomized to colonoscopy with a standard colonoscope (Olympus CF-100L) or with a pediatric colonoscope (Olympus PCF-100). All procedures were performed by a faculty endoscopist and timed by an independent observer. After examinations, the endoscopist graded procedure difficulty and patients were given a questionnaire that assessed their experience. RESULTS: The adult (n = 77) and pediatric (n = 73) colonoscope groups were comparable in all outcomes measured, including success in reaching the cecum (91% vs. 93%, p = 0.61), mean time to reach the cecum (11.4 vs. 9.7 min, p = 0.07), mean total procedure time (21.8 vs. 21.9 min, p = 0.95), mean meperidine dose (55 vs. 52 mg, p = 0.17); median midazolam dose (2.0 mg in both groups, p = 0.10), the endoscopists' perception of procedure difficulty, and patient comfort scales. Of the 7 patients in whom colonoscopy with the adult colonoscope was unsuccessful, the cecum was reached in 4 by switching to a pediatric colonoscope (all women, 3 of whom had prior hysterectomy). In the 5 patients in whom colonoscopy with the pediatric colonoscope was unsuccessful, the cecum was reached in 1 by switching to an adult colonoscope. Including the cases in which the cecum was reached by switching to the alternative colonoscope, the overall frequency of cecal intubation was 143 of 150 (95%). Subgroup analysis disclosed no difference between the 2 groups in outcomes when gender, presence of diverticulosis, and patient size were considered. Colonoscopy with the pediatric colonoscope was more successful than with the adult instrument in reaching the cecum in women with prior hysterectomy (11 of 12 [92%] vs. 15 of 21 [71%]); however, the numbers in each group were relatively small and the difference was not significant (p = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: The pediatric colonoscope is suitable for routine colonoscopy in adults. It is also useful in patients in whom colonoscopy with the adult colonoscope is unsuccessful in reaching the cecum (particularly in women). Additional study is needed to see if the pediatric colonoscope is actually superior to the adult colonoscopy for routine colonoscopy in women with prior hysterectomy.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Comparison of EUS and magnifying colonoscopy for assessment of small colorectal cancers.

BACKGROUND: Prediction of invasion depth and lymph node metastasis is mandatory when local treatment is considered for small colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of EUS with a catheter probe (probe-EUS) and magnifying colonoscopy for prediction of invasion depth and lymph node metastasis for small colorectal cancer. METHODS: Small colorectal cancers were imaged by both probe-EUS and magnifying colonoscopy. Invasion depth by probe-EUS was determined by the presence or absence of distortion of the third sonographic layer. Findings by magnifying colonoscopy were divided into regular, distorted, and amorphous patterns. Histopathologically, depth of invasion was classified as intramucosa/slight or deep invasion. Findings by probe-EUS and magnifying colonoscopy were compared with respect to deep invasion and lymph node metastasis. RESULTS: There were 22 small colorectal cancers with intramucosa/slight invasion and 28 with deep invasion. Four of 30 cancers had associated lymph node metastasis. Accuracy for depth of invasion was 91.8% for probe-EUS and 63.3% in magnifying colonoscopy, the difference being statistically significant (p = 0.0013). Negative predictive value of probe-EUS for deep invasion was higher than that for magnifying colonoscopy (respectively, 90.9% vs. 54.1%) in the population studied (prevalence deep invasion 56%). The accuracy for lymph node metastasis was 24.1% for probe-EUS and 72.4% for magnifying colonoscopy, the difference being statistically significant (p < 0.001). Positive predictive value for lymph node metastasis was higher when the amorphous pattern was noted by magnifying colonoscopy compared with the positive predictive value for deep invasion by probe-EUS (respectively, 33.3% vs. 8.7%) in the population studied (prevalence lymph node metastasis 13.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Probe-EUS is superior to magnifying colonoscopy for determination of invasion depth in small colorectal cancer. Magnifying colonoscopy may be predictive of lymph node metastasis, thereby suggesting that the procedures provide complementary information with respect to the decision for local versus surgical therapy.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Prospective comparison of air-contrast barium enema and colonoscopy in patients with fecal occult blood: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The utility of air-contrast barium enema and colonoscopy for evaluation of the colon has been debated. Air-contrast barium enema is less expensive and invasive than colonoscopy, but it also is less sensitive and specific. Further, although air-contrast barium enema may be less painful than colonoscopy, it often is poorly tolerated by patients. Thus, this study compared the sensitivity and the specificity of air-contrast barium enema and colonoscopy for detection of colonic lesions in patients with fecal occult blood. METHODS: Over a 30-month period, patients with fecal occult blood were recruited. Patients underwent standard air-contrast barium enema, followed by colonoscopy 7 to 14 days later. Colonoscopists were blinded to the results of air-contrast barium enema until the colonoscopy was completed, after which the results were disclosed. If the findings were discrepant, colonoscopy was repeated. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were evaluated. Nine air-contrast barium enemas were reported to be inadequate, and the cecum was not intubated at colonoscopy in two patients. In the remaining patients, 5 cancers were identified (1 each cecum, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum) by both studies. Sixty-six polypoid lesions were identified in 30 patients. Diverticula were identified in 42 patients by air-contrast barium enema and in 18 patients by colonoscopy. Air-contrast barium enema detected 3 of 36 polypoid lesions 5 mm or less in diameter, 5 of 15 adenomas 6 to 9 mm in size, and 4 of 15 adenomas 10 mm or greater in diameter (sensitivity 8%, 33%, and 27%, respectively). After excluding patients with diverticula, air-contrast barium enema detected 3 of 7 adenomas 10 mm or greater in size. Overall, 12 polypoid lesions or filling defects were identified by air-contrast barium enema that could not be verified by colonoscopy. The specificity of air-contrast barium enema for lesions 1.0 cm or greater in size was 100%; for those 6 mm or greater, it was 97%. CONCLUSIONS: Air-contrast barium enema accurately detects colon cancer and diverticula. Its sensitivity for detection of polypoid lesions or adenomas is poor and was confounded by the presence of diverticula.

Adenomatous Polyps↗

PubMed2004

Strategies to address increased demand for colonoscopy: Guidelines in an open endoscopy practice.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Since Medicare approval for reimbursement of screening colonoscopies, the number of colonoscopy requests has increased. Physician resources have often been inadequate to meet the demand. We sought to reduce the demand for colonoscopy in an open endoscopy system by using a guideline-based triage system to eliminate inappropriate procedures and to align the timing of surveillance colonoscopies with recommendations made by national organizations. METHODS: This was a cohort study with primary care outpatients. From October 2002 to February 2003, 498 consecutive patients on a waiting list of 2400 awaiting colonoscopy for all indications were triaged and are the focus of the study. Selection of patients for appropriate colonoscopy was based on consensus guidelines developed for institutional use by using established published guidelines for appropriate colonoscopy indications. RESULTS: Of the 498 consecutive patients triaged, 139 (28%) were deemed inappropriate. The most common reason was inappropriate referral for surveillance of colorectal polyps. The percentage of inappropriate referrals by the 3 largest referring specialties (internal medicine, family medicine, and gastroenterology) combined was also 28% with no statistically significant differences between specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Most referrals for colonoscopy in an open-access endoscopy system were appropriate, although about 1 in 4 were not. Use of triage and further education of physicians regarding colonoscopy may optimize colonoscopy utilization.

Cohort Studies↗

PubMed2006

Risk stratification for colon neoplasia: screening strategies using colonoscopy and computerized tomographic colonography.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We developed a risk index to identify low-risk patients who may be screened for colorectal cancer with computerized tomographic colonography (CTC) instead of colonoscopy. METHODS: Asymptomatic persons aged 50 years or older who had undergone screening colonoscopy were randomized retrospectively to derivation (n = 1512) and validation (n = 1493) subgroups. We developed a risk index (based on age, sex, and family history) from the derivation group. The expected results of 3 screening strategies--universal colonoscopy, universal CTC, and a stratified strategy of colonoscopy for high-risk and CTC for low-risk patients--were then compared. Outcomes for the 3 strategies were extrapolated from the known colonic findings in each patient, using sensitivity/specificity values for CTC from the medical literature. Results were validated in the validation subgroup. RESULTS: In the derivation subgroup, universal colonoscopy detected 94% of advanced neoplasia and universal CTC detected only 70% and resulted in the largest total number of procedures and number of patients undergoing both procedures. The stratified strategy detected 92% of advanced neoplasia, requiring colonoscopy in 68% and CTC in 36% of patients, with only 4% having to undergo both procedures. In the validation subgroup, universal colonoscopy detected 94% and universal CTC detected 71% of advanced neoplasia, whereas the stratified strategy detected 89%, requiring colonoscopy in 64% and CTC in 40%. Unlike universal CTC, the stratified strategy was independent of assumptions for CTC sensitivity, specificity, and threshold for colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The stratified strategy based on our risk index may optimize the yield of colonoscopic resources and reduce the number of patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Colonic Neoplasms↗

PubMed2000

The effects of a preassessment clinic on nonattendance rates for day-case colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Nonattendance for colonoscopy contributes to an increase in the waiting lists for this procedure. Preassessment clinics routinely run for a number of day-patient surgical procedures have been shown to reduce nonattendance rates by enhancing patient understanding. This study aimed to determine prospectively whether preassessing patients booked for colonoscopy would lead to a reduction in the nonattendance rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nonattendance rates for colonoscopy were assessed in consecutive 9-month periods. During the first period all patients were mailed appointments for colonoscopy with dietary and purgative bowel preparation instructions. During the second period, patients who had never previously undergone a colonoscopic examination were invited to attend a preassessment clinic, while patients who had attended for colonoscopy in the past were sent appointments and purgative instructions in the post. RESULTS: 344 colonoscopies were booked in the first 9-month period and 350 in the second, of which 195 were preassessed. Overall, 60 patients did not attend for colonoscopy during the first 9-month period (17.4%), and 40 (11.4%; P<0.05) did not attend during the second period of study. During the second 9 months only six (3.1%) of the 195 preassessed patients did not attend for colonoscopy, in comparison with 34 (22%; P<0.0001) of the 155 patients not preassessed. CONCLUSIONS: By running a limited preassessment clinic for patients due for colonoscopy, we have shown a significant reduction in the nonattendance rate. If all patients were to attend for preassessment, nonattendance rates for colonoscopy might be reduced to that seen in our preassessment group (3.1%).

Ambulatory Care↗

PubMed2001

The impact of endoscopists' experience and learning curves and interendoscopist variation on colonoscopy completion rates.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Since its introduction in the late 1960s, the technology of colonoscopy has developed rapidly and the competence of endoscopists has increased. Nevertheless, it is not always possible to perform a complete colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to assess, in a population-based setting, the endoscopist-related factors influencing the completion rate, taking into account patient characteristics and changes in the technology over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All colonoscopy records between 1979 and 1995 in one Swedish county (population 258,000) were retrieved. Information was obtained about patient demographics, date of examination, endoscopist, indications, presence of diverticulosis, type of colonoscopy, findings, level of completion, complications, and reasons for incomplete colonoscopy. Completion rates were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of 5,494 colonoscopies, 4,153 (75%) were complete, and 78% were diagnostic and 22% therapeutic. In 70 %, findings were pathological, and 30 % were normal. The overall 30-day endoscopist-related complication rate was 0.3 %. Over time, the proportion of colonoscopies performed by endoscopists with greater experience increased and so did the completion rates. Completion rates were influenced by endoscopist's experience and to some extent by the intensity (the number of colonoscopies performed by the endoscopist during the previous 90 days). There was a large interendoscopist variation, at each level of experience, in the ability to perform a complete colonoscopy, implying substantial differences between individual learning curves. CONCLUSIONS: The completion rate has increased over time, the major reason being greater competence of endoscopists. The finding of large interendoscopist variation, at each level of experience, in the ability to perform a complete colonoscopy supports the monitoring of endoscopists to maintain and improve performance.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Experts fail to reach the cecum in 2 - 10% of colonoscopies. The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the efficacy of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The variable-stiffness colonoscope (Olympus America XPCF-140AL) was used by the same examiner to reattempt colonoscopy immediately in all patients in whom colonoscopy to the cecum with the standard colonoscope was incomplete. RESULTS: Sixteen of 385 attempted colonoscopies (4.2%) did not reach the cecum with the standard colonoscope due to looping (n = 12), fixed angulation of the sigmoid colon (n = 3), and diverticulosis (n = 1). The procedures were deemed a failure after a mean of 28 min, despite the use of abdominal pressure and positional change in all patients. Fifteen of the 16 patients (94 %) had a complete colonoscopy with the variable-stiffness colonoscope. One patient had an incomplete colonoscopy with the variable-stiffness colonoscope due to an obstructing mass in the transverse colon that was not reached by the standard colonoscope. With the variable-stiffness colonoscope, the mean time to cecal intubation was 10.3 min; four patients (25 %) required a change in patient position, and six patients (37.5 %) required abdominal pressure. CONCLUSIONS: A variable-stiffness colonoscope allowed completion of colonoscopy in all patients without obstruction who had an incomplete colonoscopy with the standard colonoscope. Further study is needed to determine whether the variable-stiffness colonoscope should be used routinely for colonoscopy.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

[Effectiveness and patient tolerance of screening colonoscopy -- first results].

BACKGROUND: In Germany screening colonoscopy was introduced into the national program on colorectal cancer prevention in October 2002 for asymptomatic subjects older than 55 years. It is the aim of this program to reduce the rate of mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC) during the next decade. Up to now no data are available concerning the outcome and patient tolerance of screening colonoscopy. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in the prospective study between October 2002 and June 2003. The diagnoses from colonoscopy and complications were recorded. A short interview provided information on individual family risks of CRC. During June 2003 all subjects were handed a questionnaire to evaluate their satisfaction and tolerance concerning screening colonoscopy. All subjects were offered sedation (Disoprivan: Propofol). RESULTS: A total of 1117 subjects (776 [69.5 %] female, 341 [30.5 %] male) underwent screening colonoscopy; age: 64.3 +/- 6.9 years. 1104 (98.8 %) requested sedation. In 1090 cases (97.6 %) colonoscopy was completed to the cecum (photographic documentation of cecal landmarks). A total of 11 patients had invasive cancer (1 %), 4 of these had adenomas containing invasive carcinoma. The stage was T1/N0 or T2/N0. A total of 138 (12.4 %) patients had 168 polypoid lesions, which were treated by complete polypectomy. 402 small polypoid lesions (< 0.5 cm) were only detected by biopsy. In this group 233 adenomas (20.9 %) were found. Complications were: 1 perforation and 4 haemorrhages after polypectomy. Patient tolerance was very high. 99.4 % of all subjects agreed to a control colonoscopy or recommended screening colonoscopy to their relatives and friends. CONCLUSION: Screening colonoscopy is an effective and well-accepted method in our unit for gastroenterology. The high prevalence of adenoma and invasive carcinoma suggests that screening colonoscopy should be provided for all persons at the age of 55, especially for men.

Adenoma, Villous↗

PubMed2005

Incomplete conventional colonoscopy: magnetic resonance colonography in the evaluation of the proximal colon.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate dark-lumen magnetic resonance (MR) colonography prospectively in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy underwent same-day dark-lumen MR colonography on the basis of a standard protocol. The depiction of colorectal diseases was assessed in the following colon segments: cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum. The reasons for incomplete colonoscopy included high-grade stenosis in 26 patients (four with occlusive cancer, 12 with fibrotic stenosis based on recurrent sigmoid diverticulitis, eight with Crohn's-induced stenosis, and two with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug colonopathy), extreme patient intolerance in one patient, and technical challenges associated with an elongated colon in five patients. The results of MR colonography were compared with the findings of the initial conventional colonoscopy, the histopathological outcome, and follow-up colonoscopy when possible. RESULTS: All high-grade stenoses were confirmed on MR colonographic data sets. Of the 26 patients with high-grade stenosis, 19 underwent surgery with histopathological confirmation of the initial diagnosis. Follow-up colonoscopy was carried out in 14 patients with surgically treated high-grade stenosis. In six of these 14 patients, nine polyps identified at the initial MR colonography were confirmed and removed during a postoperative conventional colonoscopy. Two polyps (5 mm and 8 mm in diameter) identified on postoperative conventional colonoscopy had not been seen preoperatively at MR colonography. One polyp seen on MR colonography was not identified in the follow-up colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: Dark-lumen MR colonography is a feasible and useful method of evaluating the entire colon in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy.

Adult↗

PubMed2007

Variations in colonoscopy practice in Europe: a multicentre descriptive study (EPAGE).

OBJECTIVE: The volume of colonoscopies performed is increasing and differences in colonoscopy practice over time and between centres have been reported. Examination of current practice is important for bench-marking quality. The objective of this study was to examine variations in colonoscopy practice in endoscopy centres internationally. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This observational study prospectively included consecutive patients referred for colonoscopy from 21 centres in 11 countries. Patient, procedure and centre characteristics were collected through questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were performed and the variation between centres while controlling for case-mix was examined. RESULTS: A total of 6004 patients were included in the study. Most colonoscopies (93%; range between centres 70-100%) were performed for diagnostic purposes. The proportion of main indications for colonoscopy showed wide variations between centres, the two most common indications, surveillance and haematochezia, ranging between 7-24% and 5-38%, respectively. High-quality cleansing occurred in 74% (range 51-94%) of patients, and 30% (range 0-100%) of patients received deep sedation. Three-quarters (range 0-100%) of the patients were monitored during colonoscopy, and one-quarter (range 14-35%) underwent polypectomy. Colonoscopy was complete in 89% (range 69-98%) of patients and the median total duration was 20 min (range of centre medians 15-30 min). The variation between centres was not reduced when case-mix was controlled for. CONCLUSIONS: This study documented wide variations in colonoscopy practice between centres. Controlling for case-mix did not remove these variations, indicating that centre and procedure characteristics play a role. Centres generally were within the existing guidelines, although there is still some work to be done to ensure that all centres attain the goal of providing high-quality colonoscopy.

Colonoscopy↗