PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Correction factor”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Angular dependence of the wall correction factor for air kerma measurements using cylindrical cavity chambers.

The dependence of the results of air kerma measurements on the orientation of the cylindrical cavity chamber used for beam standardizations is reexamined. The wall attenuation correction factors for the (60)Co and (136)Cs air kerma measurements were obtained for various irradiation angles by extrapolation of the dependences of experimental data and by Monte Carlo simulations. Applying the correction based on extrapolation does not provide an angle-invariant air kerma rate, as desired. In contrast, Monte Carlo simulations, which take into account various affecting phenomena, produce a wall correction factor that makes the corrected air kerma independent of the incidence angle.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1996

10 MV x-ray zero-area phantom scatter correction factors (Sp) obtained using three extrapolation methods.

Three sets of 10 MV x-ray zero-area phantom scatter correction factors (Sp) have been obtained using three methods. The three methods are all based on the Bjärngard-Petti extrapolation principle. The three sets of data assume lateral CPE (charged particle equilibrium) for the primary absorbed dose. Using the most reliable set of data, a set of 10 MV x-ray SMRs (scatter-maximum ratios) is produced and parameterized. With respect to the zero-area Sp correction factor at a depth of 2.5 cm, the parameterized expression gives Sp (0; 2.5) = 0.931 and a Rice-Chin Monte Carlo simulation gives Sp (0; 2.5) = 0.927. The former is only 0.4% larger than the latter.

Humans↗
PubMed1989

Correction of metatarsus primus varus with the Chevron metatarsal osteotomy. An analysis of corrective factors.

A trigonometric evaluation of the amount of correction of metatarsus primus varus obtainable via lateral displacement of the first metatarsal head in a Chevron osteotomy technique revealed that approximately 1 degree of correction may be obtained for each millimeter of lateral shift. This calculated correction was correlated with the actual correction obtained in ten feet. Narrowing of the metatarsal head associated with removal of the medial eminence was an additional corrective factor.

Adult↗
PubMed1976

The use of correction factors in the determination of mutant frequencies in populations of human diploid skin fibroblasts.

The need and validity for using a number of correction factors in the determination of mutant frequencies in human diploid skin fibroblasts was investigated. Resistance to the purine analogue 8-azaguanine was used as selective system. It appears that, under the conditions used, there were no effect of the cell density on the cloning efficiency. Therefore observed mutant frequencies need to be corrected for cloning efficiency. The reliability of using Lesch-Nyhan cells as a prototype mutant in the estimation of the efficiency of mutant recovery was investigated and found to hold true. The relation between the efficiency of mutant recovery and cell density, which reflects the degree of inter-clone metabolic cooperation, was measured. The use of this relationship enhances the accuracy of the estimated mutant frequencies. With these correction factors the mutation rate was estimated to be 5.7 - 10(-6) per cell per generation. The influence of intra-clone metabolic cooperation was determined and found to be small if present.

Azaguanine↗
PubMed2005

The effects of geology and the impact of seasonal correction factors on indoor radon levels: a case study approach.

Geology has been highlighted by a number of authors as a key factor in high indoor radon levels. In the light of this, this study examines the application of seasonal correction factors to indoor radon concentrations in the UK. This practice is based on an extensive database gathered by the National Radiological Protection Board over the years (small-scale surveys began in 1976 and continued with a larger scale survey in 1988) and reflects well known seasonal variations observed in indoor radon levels. However, due to the complexity of underlying geology (the UK arguably has the world's most complex solid and surficial geology over the shortest distances) and considerable variations in permeability of underlying materials it is clear that there are a significant number of occurrences where the application of a seasonal correction factor may give rise to over-estimated or under-estimated radon levels. Therefore, the practice of applying a seasonal correction should be one that is undertaken with caution, or not at all. This work is based on case studies taken from the Northamptonshire region and comparisons made to other permeable geologies in the UK.

Air Pollutants, Radioactive↗
PubMed2005

Evaluation of etching correction factor for LR115 cellulose nitrate films from track parameters.

LR115 cellulose nitrate films efficiency is strongly dependent on the conditions of etching. In this paper a new method to evaluate a correction factor for this effect is given. The film is scanned with an high-resolution scanner, the diameter of the tracks is measured, and the correction factor is calculated from the average diameter of the tracks. The sensitivity of the film is found to have a linear dependence on the average diameter, and the classical correction, based on the residual thickness, can be substituted by a method based on average track diameter.

Cellulose↗
PubMed1983

Dynamic BTPS correction factors for spirometric data.

Because it is often difficult to completely control ambient temperature, a study was conducted to investigate dynamic body temperature pressure saturated (BTPS) correction factors for spirometric data. A forced expiratory simulator system was heated to 37 degrees C and loaded with air saturated with water vapor. This air was then forced from the simulator into a dry rolling-seal spirometer maintained at various ambient temperatures from 3 to 32 degrees C. Errors in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and peak flow from assuming a constant BTPS correction ranged from 7.7 and 14.1% at 3 degrees C to 2.1 and 4.6% at 23 degrees C. Differences between errors observed when saturated and dry air were forced into the spirometer indicate that water vapor condensation introduces an added heat load to the spirometer, adding approximately one percent to the error in FEV1 at lower temperatures. By use of a model to estimate the dynamic BTPS correction factor, errors in FEV1 at all temperatures between 3 and 32 degrees C were reduced to less than 1.5%.

Body Temperature↗
PubMed1987

Volume correction factor in time dose relationships in brachytherapy.

Paterson's clinical data about the maximum tolerance doses for various volumes of interstitial implants with Ra-226 delivered in seven days was made use of in deriving volume correction factors phi v and phi'v for TDF and CRE concepts respectively for brachytherapy. The derived volume correction factors phi v for TDF and phi'v for CRE differ from the from the one assumed for CRE by Kirk et al. and implied for TDF by Goitein. A normalising volume of 70 cc has been suggested for both CRE and TDF concepts for brachytherapy. A table showing TDFv, the volume corrected TDF, is presented for various volumes and dose rates for continuous irradiation. The use of this table is illustrated with examples.

Brachytherapy↗
PubMed2003

Seasonal correction factors for estimating radon exposure in dwellings in France.

Indoor radon concentrations are subject to seasonal variation with a maximum in winter and a minimum in summer. Procedures to correct for seasonal variation are necessary in order to get an unbiased estimate of the annual average radon concentration from data based on short-period radon measurements. To obtain correction factors, we apply the model developed by Pinel et al to the French database of indoor radon measurements (measurements performed as part of the indoor radon case-control study and of the national radon measurement campaign). For 6-month measurements, the correction factors vary from 0.87 to 1.17 and agree with those previously published. These results might be applicable when assessing indoor radon concentrations with regard to recommended action levels.

Air Pollutants, Radioactive↗
PubMed1994

Monte Carlo calculations of monoenergetic electron depth dose distributions in LiF chips: skin dose correction factors for beta rays.

Monte Carlo calculations have been carried out for monoenergetic electrons from 0.1 to 4 MeV irradiating LiF chips in both perpendicular and isotropic geometry. This enabled the calculation of skin dose correction factors (beta factors) for typical beta energy spectra as measured with a beta-ray spectrometer at CANDU nuclear generating stations. The correction factors were estimated by averaging the depth dose distributions for the monoenergetic electrons over the experimentally measured beta-ray spectra. The calculations illustrate the large uncertainty in beta factors arising from the unknown angular distribution of the beta-ray radiation field and uncertainties in the shape of the beta-ray spectra below 500 keV.

Fluorides↗
PubMed2003

Calculations of electron fluence correction factors using the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.

In electron-beam dosimetry, plastic phantom materials may be used instead of water for the determination of absorbed dose to water. A correction factor phi(water)plastic is then needed for converting the electron fluence in the plastic phantom to the fluence at an equivalent depth in water. The recommended values for this factor given by AAPM TG-25 (1991 Med. Phys. 18 73-109) and the IAEA protocols TRS-381 (1997) and TRS-398 (2000) disagree, in particular at large depths. Calculations of the electron fluence have been done, using the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE, in semi-infinite phantoms of water and common plastic materials (PMMA, clear polystyrene, A-150, polyethylene, Plastic water and Solid water (WT1)). The simulations have been carried out for monoenergetic electron beams of 6, 10 and 20 MeV, as well as for a realistic clinical beam. The simulated fluence correction factors differ from the values in the AAPM and IAEA recommendations by up to 2%, and are in better agreement with factors obtained by Ding et al (1997 Med. Phys. 24 161-76) using EGS4. Our Monte Carlo calculations are also in good accordance with phi(water)plastic values measured by using an almost perturbation-free ion chamber. The important interdependence between depth- and fluence-scaling corrections for plastic phantoms is discussed. Discrepancies between the measured and the recommended values of phi(water)plastic may then be explained considering the different depth-scaling rules used.

Biophysical Phenomena↗
PubMed2003

Results supporting calculated wall correction factors for cavity chambers.

Thick walled cavity ionization chambers are used by primary standard laboratories as primary air kerma standards in 137Cs and 60Co gamma-rays. Application of the cavity theory requires correction for the effects of photon attenuation and scattering in the chamber walls. For more than a decade there have been intensive discussions about the validity of wall correction factors determined by more traditional extrapolation methods versus those calculated by Monte Carlo methods. For existing primary standards the alternative methods lead to results that differ by up to 50% of the correction itself. This report presents both experimental and theoretical results which strongly support the validity of calculated wall correction factors. Moreover, it is demonstrated that, in selected cases, the application of a linear extrapolation method leads to errors in the determination of the air kerma reaching up to 13%.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1980

Background correction factors in renography with single probe detectors.

The background correction factor was determined with [131I]albumin, FA, in eighty-six patients with various nephro-urological diseases, with [131I]hippuran in eighty unilaterally nephrectomized patients (FH), and in twenty-five patients in whom the renogram showed background configuration, FH, B. FH was approximately the same on the left and the right side, the mean values being 1.39 and 1.35, respectively. FA showed a significant side difference, the mean values being 1.30 and 1.19 on the right side, respectively. FH, B was higher than FH, which shows that some uptake of hippuran can take place in apparently non functioning kidneys.

Background Radiation↗
PubMed1984

The determination of an empirical correction factor to deal with the problem of nucleolar splitting in neuronal counts.

Nucleolar counts are the method of choice for determining neuronal numbers. The main problem is the determination of an accurate correction factor for split nucleoli. The difficulties are that small nucleolar fragments are often unrecognizable and that nucleoli may be pushed or rolled rather than cleanly cut by the knife. A widely used method uses an estimate to account for the difficulties, and almost all methods depend on measurements of such things as section thickness and nucleolar diameters. We differ from previous procedures by identifying neurons first and then determining whether the nucleolus in each identified neuron is split or whole. If N is the true number of neurons, n the number of nucleoli counted to estimate N, T the number of nucleoli counted for the correction factor and S the number of nucleoli in T that are split, then N = [(T-S/2)/T] X n. The advantages are that the observations are easily done and that there are no estimates, only a determination of the numbers of whole and split nucleoli for a sample population of neurons.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Correction factors for water-proofing sleeves in kilovoltage x-ray beams.

This paper investigates the effect of the waterproofing sleeve on the calibration of kilovoltage photon beams (50-300 kV). The sleeve effect correction factor, ps has been calculated using the Monte Carlo method as the ratios of the air kerma in an air cavity of a cylindrical chamber without the waterproofing sleeve to that with a sleeve. Three sleeve materials have been studied, PMMA, nylon and polystyrene. The calculations were carried out using the EGS4 (Electron Gamma Shower version 4) code system with the application of a correlated-sampling variance-reduction technique. The results show that the sleeve correction factor for 1-mm thick nylon and polystyrene sleeves, ps varies from 0.992 to 1.000 and from 0.981 to 1.000, respectively, for the same beam quality range. The ps factor varies with sleeve thickness, beam quality and phantom depth. No significant dependence of the ps factor on field size and source-surface distance has been found. Measurements for PMMA, nylon and polystyrene sleeves of various thicknesses have also been carried out and show excellent agreement with Monte Carlo calculations.

Biophysical Phenomena↗
PubMed1990

[Interpretation of postmortem digoxin levels: evaluating a "corrective factor" for postmortem blood digoxin concentration].

Interpretation of postmortem serum digoxin levels is made difficult above all by a possible prefinal or postmortem rise in digoxin concentrations in the blood. To compensate for this postmortem increase, Eriksson et al. (1984) divided the level of postmortem digoxin in femoral venous blood by a factor of 1.5; in the opinion of these authors, postmortem digoxin levels still exceeding "therapeutic levels" after division by 1.5 are an index of digoxin overdose. The diagnostic value of this "correction factor" was investigated. In 56 cases with documented digoxin medication, samples of postmortem femoral venous blood were taken and the level of digoxin determined. In none of the cases had there been a clinical diagnosis of digoxin intoxication. Fifty percent of the measured values were above "therapeutic levels" (0.7 ng/ml to 2.2 ng/ml). Following division by 1.5, 20% of the cases still showed levels exceeding 2.2 ng/ml; the highest "corrected" value was 4.44 ng/ml. Taking into account the length of time between final dosage and death, individual differences in sensitivity to digitalis glycoside, and the complexity of ante- and postmortem dispersion processes, we concluded for the cases we studied that an (undetected) digoxin overdose was not even likely in those cases whose postmortem values after division by 1.5 lie above "therapeutic levels". The "correction factor" proposed by Eriksson et al. (1984) is only of limited diagnostic value; at best the "corrected" values can give an approximate indication of the corresponding antemortem serum digoxin concentrations. In particular, "corrected" values only a little above "therapeutic levels" could not confirm suspicion of an overdose with sufficient certainty.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Experimental derivation of wall correction factors for ionization chambers used in high dose rate 192Ir source calibration.

At present there are no specific primary standards for 192Ir high dose rate sources used in brachytherapy. Traceability to primary standards is guaranteed through the method recommended by the AAPM that derives the air kerma calibration factor for the 192Ir gamma rays as the average of the air kerma calibration factors for x-rays and 137Cs gamma-rays or the Maréchal et al. method that uses the energy-weighted air kerma calibration factors for 250 kV x rays and 60Co gamma rays as the air kerma calibration factor for the 192Ir gamma rays. In order to use these methods, it is necessary to use the same buildup cap for all energies and the appropriate wall correction factor for each chamber. This work describes experimental work used to derive the A(W) for four different ionization chambers and different buildup cap materials for the three energies involved in the Maréchal et al. method. The A(W) for the two most common ionization chambers used in hospitals, the Farmer NE 2571 and PTW N30001 is 0.995 and 0.997, respectively, for 250 kV x rays, 0.982 and 0.985 for 192Ir gamma rays, and 0.979 and 0.991 for 60Co gamma rays, all for a PMMA build-up cap of 0.550 gm cm(-2). A comparison between the experimental values and Monte Carlo calculations shows an agreement better than 0.9%. Availability of the A(W) correction factors for all commercial chambers allows users of the in-air calibration jig, provided by the manufacturer, to alternatively use the Maréchal et al. method. Calibration laboratories may also used this method for calibration of a well-type ionization chamber with a comparable accuracy to the AAPM method.

Brachytherapy↗