SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Deep Brain Stimulation”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

PubMed2004

Mechanical failure of the electrode wire in deep brain stimulation.

The feasibility and efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) has offered new possibilities for treatment of movement disorders. Mechanical failure of the DBS system is a potential complication. Here we report five patients who presented with mechanical failure of the DBS system. Radiographs of the skull and cervical spine were analyzed for disruptions. Seven instances of lead breakage near the connection of the DBS electrode with the extension wire were identified. In one patient this was in the paramastoid area over the skull, while in all others were in the supraclavicular location. The patients consisted of three men and two women ranging in age from 24 to 78 (at the time of first operation), one person suffering three breakages. The length of spanned time from implantation to presentation ranged from 8 to 32 months. Palpation of the electrode lead wire in the neck for breakage proved unreliable. Radiography localized the site of breakage in all but one patient who required intraoperative exploration, which revealed that although the lead wire was disrupted, the two ends remained in contact. The fact that all breakages occurred near the connection wire suggests that to-and-fro motion of the DBS electrode with repeated head turning leads to fatigue and eventual disruption.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Deep brain stimulation for advanced Parkinson's disease.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a new and promising technique for the treatment of movement disorders. Medically intractable Parkinson's disease (PD) is one of the most common indications for DBS. There are three possible subcortical targets for PD, depending on the symptomatology (i.e., the motor subdivision of the thalamus, the globus pallidus internus, the subthalamic nucleus [STN]). Thalamic stimulation has been well established as a safe and effective treatment for essential tremor and the tremor associated with PD. Globus pallidus internus and STN DBS are being investigated for the treatment of all the cardinal signs of PD. This article describes the pathophysiology of PD, the surgical treatment history of PD, surgical techniques used for DBS implants, and the role the perioperative nurse has in the care of the patients undergoing these procedures.

Brain↗

PubMed2002

MRI- and skull x-ray-based approaches to evaluate the position of deep brain stimulation electrode contacts--a technical note.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has developed into an established therapy for the treatment of movement disorders, most commonly Parkinson's disease and tremor of different etiology. The subthalamic nucleus (STN) has evolved as the preferred target for DBS in patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. The principal target for DBS in tremor patients is the ventrolateral thalamus which has been explored for ablative procedures (thalamotomy) for some decades. Detailed information about the exact site of chronic stimulation, i.e. the location of the active electrode contacts, are important to map the actual subcortical structures modulating the therapeutic effects of DBS. We compared two different methods not requiring intra-operative teleradiography to determine the stereotactic coordinates of single electrode contacts, (i) correlation of pre- and post-operative MRI, and (ii) post-operative stereotactic skull x-ray. For seven patients implanted bilateral with quadripolar DBS electrodes the coordinates for each contact were determined by both approaches. This revealed for a total of 56 electrode contacts a median euclidean 3D-difference between both methods of 1.18 mm (range 0.42 to 1.93 mm). These data suggest that both approaches may be used to determine the position of single electrode contacts.

Electric Stimulation Therapy↗

PubMed2004

Asymptomatic transient MRI signal changes after unilateral deep brain stimulation electrode implantation for movement disorder.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an accepted treatment of movement disorders, but little research on tissue changes induced by these devices has been made. We report findings of MRI signal changes in patients with unilateral DBS implantation and no clinically detectable symptoms. A retrospective review of preoperative stereotactic MRI scans for staged placement of second-side DBS was performed in 38 patients to assess the frequency of signal changes along the previously implanted DBS track. No abnormal signal changes were noted in 23 patients (61%). Increased subcortical signals on T2-weighted fast spin echo MRI sequences along the DBS track were noted in 15 patients (39%) and varied from circumferential hyperintensity along the electrode track to significant involvement of the subcortical white matter. The changes were only detected in scans performed within 3 months of DBS implantation (15 of 27 patients). Despite these changes, the patients were totally asymptomatic. The etiology of the changes is unknown but may reflect a transient tissue response to the implantation of the electrode.

Brain↗

PubMed2002

Blood flow responses to deep brain stimulation of thalamus.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (VIM) provides remarkable relief of tremor in the limbs contralateral to the side of the brain stimulated. The benefits have been sufficiently dramatic that this is now an accepted clinical treatment of essential as well as other forms of tremor. Despite this clinical benefit, the mechanism of action of DBS remains unknown. In this investigation, we sought to determine the effects of VIM DBS on neuronal function. METHODS: The authors used PET measurements of qualitative regional cerebral blood flow in patients with essential tremor to determine the effects of DBS in the left VIM. Each subject had four to six scans with the arms at rest and DBS turned either on or off during alternate scans. Continuous physiologic monitoring revealed no tremor during any of the scans. The PET images from each subject were aligned, averaged, and coregistered to a standard image oriented in stereotactic space. RESULTS: The authors used subtraction image analysis with statistical parametric mapping methods and a restricted volume search to identify a significantly increased flow response at the site of stimulation in thalamus. An exploratory analysis revealed increased flow in ipsilateral supplementary motor area, a region that receives afferents from VIM. CONCLUSIONS: The increased blood flow at terminal fields of thalamocortical projections suggests that DBS stimulates and does not inactivate projection neurons in VIM thalamus.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Co-registration of stereotactic MRI and isofieldlines during deep brain stimulation.

OBJECT: The parameter adjustment process during deep brain stimulation (DBS) for dystonia remains time consuming and based on clinical observation alone. The aim was to correlate the electric field with the GPi anatomy to be able to study the stimulated volume. METHODS: We developed a computer-assisted method (model) for visualizing electric field in reference to the stereotactic space. Electric field values were correlated with the GPi anatomy (stereotactic Magnetic Resonance Imaging) in one reference patient. RESULTS: Using this methodology it becomes possible to correlate the electric field distributions for patient specific parameters with the anatomical information. The application to one patient showed that the 0.1V/mm isofieldline fits best with the lateral GPi borders at the level of the stimulated contacts. CONCLUSIONS: The electric field is a crucial parameter as it is assumed to be responsible for triggering action potentials. Electric field visualisation allows the calculation of the stimulated volume for a given isoline. Its application to our whole patient population might help in determining a threshold for obtaining a therapeutic effect, to date unknown, and consequently in optimizing the parameter setting in each patient.

Brain↗

PubMed2005

Thalamic deep brain stimulation for management of essential tremor.

OBJECT: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus is used for the treatment of patients with medically refractory essential tremor (ET). The authors evaluated patient outcomes after DBS surgery. METHODS: Clinical outcomes were evaluated in 19 patients who had undergone DBS surgery by using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin clinical tremor rating scale. All adverse outcomes were also systematically recorded during follow-up outpatient visits. Eighteen DBS systems were implanted. The median follow-up period after surgery was 27 months (range 10-75 months). The preoperative mean Fahn-Tolosa-Marin action tremor score was 3.3 +/- 0.5, and the postoperative mean score with the DBS system activated was 0.8 +/- 0.4. The mean preoperative writing score was 2.8 +/- 0.9, and the postoperative mean writing score with the DBS system activated was 1 +/- 0.6. (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.005). Fourteen patients were treated with bipolar stimulation, and four eventually required monopolar stimulation. Complications included lead breakage (one patient); temporary erythema of the incision through which the pulse generator had been implanted, which required oral antibiotics (one patient); electrode migration, which required surgery (one patient); and mild hand tingling during stimulation (three patients). Twelve of 18 patients with implanted systems experienced no morbid condition. CONCLUSIONS: Thalamic DBS is safe and effective for medically refractory ET. Stimulator adjustments can frequently occur in some patients, and tremor may worsen despite a readjustment in the system.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of neurological and psychiatric disease.

Deep brain stimulation has become a topic of intense interest both from a clinical and basic science perspective. Its indications, currently including Parkinson's disease, tremor and dystonia, may expand in the future to include not only other movement disorders but also epilepsy, obsessive-compulsive disorder and other neuropsychiatric conditions. The mechanism(s) of action of deep brain stimulation have only recently begun to be characterized and have already yielded surprises that may open the door to a greater expansion of the indications for this novel and powerful therapeutic intervention.

Deep Brain Stimulation↗

PubMed2005

Physiological recordings from electrodes implanted in the basal ganglia for deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. the relevance of fast subthalamic rhythms.

Deep brain stimulation electrodes implanted in the subthalamic nucleus of patients with Parkinson's disease allow electrophysiological recordings from the human basal ganglia. Subthalamic local field potential recordings revealed the presence of multiple rhythms, from the classical EEG frequency range (<50 Hz), to surprisingly high frequencies (70 Hz and 300 Hz). Fast rhythms are particularly attractive because of their likely interaction with the excitatory mechanisms of action of deep brain stimulation. Here we investigated whether the two rhythms at 70 Hz and at 300 Hz represent distinct modes of operation, and therefore different targets, within the subthalamic nucleus. We retrospectively analyzed the dataset we used to describe the 300 Hz rhythm (Foffani, Priori et al., Brain 126: 2153-2163, 2003) searching for significant 70 Hz oscillations after levodopa administration. Whereas (as previously reported) 300 Hz activity was a consistent feature in the dataset, significant 70 Hz activity was observed in only 2 of 11 nuclei. Therefore, 70 Hz oscillations are not a necessary condition for the presence of 300 Hz oscillations. The two rhythms probably arise from different mechanisms, reflecting different functional and/or spatial aspects of subthalamic pathophysiology. Fast subthalamic oscillations could be exploited for intra-operative electrophysiological monitoring of the subthalamic nucleus, post-operative confirmation of electrode placement and patient-specific 'reglage' of the electrical parameters for chronic deep brain stimulation.

Basal Ganglia↗

PubMed2005

Venous air embolism during deep brain stimulation surgery in an awake supine patient.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus is used to improve Parkinsonian symptoms and reduce levodopa-induced motor complications in Parkinson's disease (PD). This procedure is usually performed with minimal or no sedation to allow accurate feedback from patients during surgery. Venous air embolism (VAE) has been previously reported in patients undergoing awake neurosurgical procedures for brain tumors or pallidotomy for PD. We describe a case of intraoperative VAE in an awake, supine patient while undergoing DBS surgery for PD who presented with coughing, tachypnea and hypoxemia. The difference in clinical presentation between VAE in awake vs. anesthetized patients is discussed as are intraoperative monitoring techniques and management options.

Cerebral Veins↗

PubMed2005

Deep brain stimulation for idiopathic or secondary movement disorders.

Deep brain stimulation has gained increasing interest in the treatment of movement disorders. Presenting our clinical series of 179 patients operated upon since 1999, the indications, risks and benefits for the patients are discussed in order to further improve the techniques and their applications.

Deep Brain Stimulation↗

PubMed2006

End of day dyskinesia in advanced Parkinson's disease can be eliminated by bilateral subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus deep brain stimulation.

We report the therapeutic effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in 2 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) with severe end of dose dyskinesia that was resistant to medical therapy. In both patients, severe, end of day ballistic dyskinesias occurred when the last levodopa dose of the day was wearing off. Globus pallidus (GPi) DBS in 1 case and subthalamic (STN) DBS in the second case produced full resolution of end of day dyskinesia.

Deep Brain Stimulation↗

PubMed2004

Subthalamic deep brain stimulation improves time perception in Parkinson's disease.

Alterations in temporal estimation have been observed in Parkinson's disease (PD) and have been associated with dopaminergic dysfunction. To investigate whether deep brain stimulation might reverse these abnormalities in PD, patients treated with electrode implantation for subthalamic deep brain stimulation were required to reproduce time intervals in different experimental conditions (off deep brain stimulation/off therapy, on deep brain stimulation/off therapy, on therapy/off deep brain stimulation). Patients treated with deep brain stimulation in off deep brain stimulation/off therapy displayed the anomalous pattern of responses typically observed in PD. When subthalamic deep brain stimulation was turned on these abnormalities were significantly attenuated. Our findings reveal that subthalamic deep brain stimulation improves time perception in PD patients, supporting the critical role of basal ganglia in this cognitive function, probably mediated by facilitated thalamo-cortical projections to the prefrontal cortex.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Effects of deep brain stimulation and levodopa on postural sway in Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify postural sway in subjects with Parkinson's disease and elderly controls, and determine the effects of Parkinson's disease, deep brain stimulation, levodopa, and their interactions on postural control during quiet stance. METHODS: Centre of foot pressure (CoP) displacement under each foot was measured during three 60 s trials of quiet stance with eyes open in 11 controls and six patients with Parkinson's disease. Subjects with Parkinson's disease were tested in four treatment conditions: off both deep brain stimulation and levodopa (off condition); on deep brain stimulation; on levodopa; and on both deep brain stimulation and levodopa. The variables extracted from CoP included: root mean square distance (rms), mean velocity, 95% power frequency (f(95%)), area of the 95% confidence ellipse (ellipse area), direction of its major axis (mdir), and postural asymmetry between the feet. RESULTS: rms and area of postural sway were larger than normal in subjects with Parkinson's disease in the off condition, increased further with levodopa, and significantly decreased with deep brain stimulation. Mean velocity and f(95%) were also larger than normal but were restored to normal by all treatments, especially by deep brain stimulation. The combined effect of deep brain stimulation and levodopa resulted in a postural sway that was an average of the effect of each treatment individually. Levodopa increased sway more in the mediolateral than in the anterior-posterior direction. Subjects with Parkinson's disease had asymmetrical mean velocity and f(95%) between the feet, and this asymmetry increased with levodopa but decreased with deep brain stimulation. The f(95%) of the CoP correlated with tremor, posture, and gait subcomponents of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with Parkinson's disease have abnormal postural sway in stance. Treatment with levodopa increases postural sway abnormalities, whereas treatment with deep brain stimulation improves postural sway. Quantitative evaluation of static posturography may be a useful adjunct to clinical measures in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Aged↗

PubMed1991

Deep brain stimulation: a review of basic research and clinical studies.

Deep brain stimulation for pain control in humans was first used almost 30 years ago and has continued to receive considerable attention. Despite the large number of clinical reports describing pain relief, numerous studies have indicated that the results of these procedures vary considerably. In addition, many neurosurgeons find the procedures unpredictable, and considerable disagreement still exists regarding important issues related to the technique itself. This review gives an historical overview of the relevant basic and clinical literature and provides a critical examination of the clinical efficacy, choice of stimulation sites, parameters of stimulation, and effects on experimental pain. Finally, we give suggestions for future research that could more definitively determine the usefulness of deep brain stimulation for pain control.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

[Deep brain stimulation].

The present renewal of the surgical treatment of Parkinson's disease, almost abandoned for twenty Years, arises from two main reasons. The first is the better understanding of the functional organization of the basal ganglia. It was demonstrated in animal models of Parkinson's disease that the loss of dopaminergic neurons within the substantia nigra, at the origin of the striatal dopaminergic defect, induces an overactivity of the excitatory glutamatergic subthalamo-internal pallidum pathway. The decrease in this hyperactivity might lead to an improvement in the pakinsonian symptoms. The second reason is the improvement in stereotactic neurosurgery in relation with the progress in neuroimaging techniques and with intraoperative electrophysiological microrecordings and stimulations, which help determine the location of the deep brain targets. In the 1970s chronic deep brain stimulation in humans was applied to the sensory nucleus of the thalamus for the treatment of intractable pain. In 1987, Benabid and colleagues suggested high frequency stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus in order to treat drug-resistant tremors and to avoid the adverse effects of thalamotomies. How deep brain stimulation works is not well known but it has been hypothetized that it could change the neuronal activities and thus avoid disease-related abnormal neuronal discharges. Potential candidates for deep brain stimulation are selected according to exclusion and inclusion criteria. Surgery can be applied to patients in good general and mental health, neither depressive nor demented and who are severely disabled despite all available drug therapies but still responsive to levodopa. The first session of surgery consists in the location of the target by ventriculography and/or brain MRI. The electrodes are implanted during the second session. The last session consists in the implantation of the neurostimulator. The ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus was the first target in which chronic deep brain stimulation electrodes were implanted in order to alleviate tremor. This technique can be applied bilaterally without the adverse effects of bilateral thalamotomies. Like pallidotomy, internal globus pallidum stimulation has a dramatic beneficial effect on levodopa-induced dyskinesia but its effects on the parkinsonian triad are less constant and opposite motor effects are sometimes observed in relation with the stimulated contact. The inconstant results, perhaps related to the complexity of the structure led to the development of subthalamic nucleus stimulation. The alleviation of motor fluctuations and the improvement in all motor symptoms allows a significant decrease in levodopa daily dose and in levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Presently, deep brain stimulation is a fashionable neurosurgical technique to treat Parkinson's disease. Subthalamic nucleus stimulation seems to be the most suitable target to control the parkinsonian triad and the motor fluctuations. Because of the possible adverse effects it must be reserved for disabled parkinsonian patients. No large randomized study comparing different targets and different neurosurgical techniques has been performed yet. Such studies, including cost benefit studies would be useful to assess the respective value of these different techniques.

Brain↗

PubMed2001

Dynamics of Parkinsonian tremor during deep brain stimulation.

The mechanism by which chronic, high frequency, electrical deep brain stimulation (HF-DBS) suppresses tremor in Parkinson's disease is unknown. Rest tremor in subjects with Parkinson's disease receiving HF-DBS was recorded continuously throughout switching the deep brain stimulator on (at an effective frequency) and off. These data suggest that the stimulation induces a qualitative change in the dynamics, called a Hopf bifurcation, so that the stable oscillations are destabilized. We hypothesize that the periodic stimulation modifies a parameter affecting the oscillation in a time dependent way and thereby induces a Hopf bifurcation. We explore this hypothesis using a schematic network model of an oscillator interacting with periodic stimulation. The mechanism of time-dependent change of a control parameter in the model captures two aspects of the dynamics observed in the data: (1) a gradual increase in tremor amplitude when the stimulation is switched off and a gradual decrease in tremor amplitude when the stimulation is switched on and (2) a time delay in the onset and offset of the oscillations. This mechanism is consistent with these rest tremor transition data and with the idea that HF-DBS acts via the gradual change of a network property. (c) 2001 American Institute of Physics.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2002

[Chronic high frequency deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus for torsion dystonia].

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS, chronic high frequency stimulation) is well established for Parkinson's disease and tremordominant movement disorders. Generalized dystonia is known as a type of movement disorder in which therapeutic options are very limited. A case of generalized dystonia is reported which was successfully treated by DBS in the Globus pallidus internus (GPI). A 26 years old male suffered from severe torsion dystonia of the lower limbs. The onset of symptoms was at age 7. It started with dystonia of the left foot. He very fast developed severe dystonia of the lower limbs. These complaints were initially treated by diazepam, later by baclofen (Lioresal ((R))) p.o em leader There was no L-DOPA response. Because of the rapid progression of the disease a cervical spinal cord stimulator was implanted with a transient success. Due to further progression of the disease the patient became wheelchair bounded and resistant for oral medication. Limited improvement of symptoms was achieved using continuous intrathecal administration of baclofen. Finally the patient was treated with 980 microgram intrathecal Baclofen (Lioresal ((R))) daily and up to 100 mg diazepam. Under these conditions the patient remained wheelchair bounded with severe lower limb dystonia. As an ultima ratio it was decided to treat the patient with stereotactic implantation of two electrodes (Medtronic 3387) and two neurostimulators (Medtronic ITREL ((R))II). The GPI was the bilateral target point. Intraoperative computerized tomography and ventriculography were used for target setting. Furthermore microrecordings were helpful to ensure the exact electrode positioning. Surgery was performed under sedation. Two weeks after surgery first improvement of symptoms was observed. Patient was able to stand with assistance. At the three months follow-up he could walk without assistance. Slight dystonic movement of the left ankle was the only remaining symptom under stimulation. The oral medication has been continuously reduced. After 6 months it was stopped. The intrathecal administered baclofen was diminished to 250 microgram daily. At the 24 months follow-up the effect of stimulation remained unchanged. However high stimulation parameters are required to maintain an optimal effect (3,5 V, 400 microseconds 145 Hz for both sides). Deep Brain Stimulation of the Globus Pallidus internus is an alternative approach for severe cases of generalized dystonia.

Adult↗