PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “EXUDATES AND TRANSUDATES”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Comparative analysis of Light's criteria and other biochemical parameters for distinguishing transudates from exudates.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the accuracy of Light's criteria for categorizing a pleural effusion as an exudate with several alternative criteria. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of patients who underwent a diagnostic thoracocentesis. SETTING: Community teaching hospital in Lleida, Spain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records and pleural fluid characteristics of 241 consecutive patients with pleural effusion admitted over a 29-month period were reviewed. Forty eight of these patients were excluded for different reasons. Light's criteria and a different cutoff level for the pleural fluid cholesterol level were applied and their accuracies were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 193 patients included, 38 (20%) had transudates and 155 (80%) exudates. The accuracy of Light's criteria for identifying exudates was 92% [confidence intervals (CI), 88-96%], with a sensitivity of 97% (CI, 94-100%) and specificity of 71% (CI, 57-85%). A cutoff level of 50 mg dl-1 was selected for pleural cholesterol, which yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 84% (CI, 79-90%), with an accuracy of 84% (CI, 72-96%). Overall, pleural cholesterol misclassified more exudates as transudates than Light's criteria (15 vs. 3.2%, P < 0.001). The combination of pleural cholesterol with lactate dehydroegnase (LDH) or pleural fluid/serum protein ratio revealed a comparable accuracy to that achieved with Light's criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Light's criteria are just as useful as the association of pleural cholesterol and LDH to detect exudates. In the present study, no parameter, including pleural cholesterol, was superior to Light's criteria.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Increased oxidative stress in exudative pleural effusions: a new marker for the differentiation between exudates and transudates?

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Oxidative stress has been associated with various respiratory disorders. We tested the hypothesis that exudates would present higher levels of oxidative stress compared to transudates, expressing the increased local oxidative burst in the former. DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional study. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: One hundred six consecutive patients who had undergone thoracentesis were studied. Ninety patients with a final diagnosis of pleural effusion were further analyzed. SETTING: The respiratory department and a clinical laboratory of a tertiary hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects underwent diagnostic thoracentesis, and standard biochemical parameters (ie, total protein, lactate dehydrogenase, and albumin levels) were measured in pleural fluid and serum. Oxidative stress levels were assessed with a commercially available method (d-ROMs test; Diacron; Grosseto, Italy) that uses conventional Carratelli units (UCarr). In 14 patients, duplicate measurements of oxidative stress and a second thoracentesis were performed on the following day for the assessment of the repeatability of measurements. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed in order to determine the optimal cutoff level for the differentiation between exudates and transudates. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Oxidative stress levels were higher in exudates compared to transudates (mean [+/- SD] stress level, 274 +/- 72 vs 126 +/- 34 UCarr, respectively; p < 0.0001). No significant differences were found among the levels of oxidative stress in exudative effusions of different etiologies. The area under the ROC curve was 0.992 (95% confidence interval, 0.945 to 0.997), and the method provided high sensitivity (96.8%), high specificity (96.3%), and high accuracy (96.7%) for the diagnosis of exudates at a cutoff level for oxidative stress of 186 UCarr. Consecutive measurements of oxidative stress in the same samples and on fluid from two different thoracenteses performed on 2 consecutive days presented excellent repeatability. CONCLUSIONS: Oxidative stress levels are higher in exudative pleural effusions compared to transudative effusions, probably due to reactive oxygen species produced in the former.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A comparative analysis of the biochemical parameters used to distinguish between pleural exudates and transudates.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the various parameters used to identify exudates. METHODOLOGY: The study included 255 patients with pleural effusions. According to aetiological diagnosis, 105 pleural effusions were labelled as transudates and 150 were labelled as exudates. RESULTS: Using the criteria of Light et al., 94.5% of the effusions were correctly classified, yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 99.3% and 87.6%, respectively. Use of the pleural fluid/serum bilirubin ratio produced results of 92.9%, 90.7%, and 96.2%, respectively. Using pleural fluid cholesterol level yielded results of 95.7%, 95.3%, and 96.2%, respectively. When the combination of pleural fluid cholesterol level and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level was used, the specificity and accuracy were found to be higher than that using the criteria of Light et al. We found that there was no significant difference among the parameters with respect to accuracy. CONCLUSION: When the accuracy and cost are considered, differentiation of pleural exudates and transudates can be achieved only by pleural fluid cholesterol level or LDH level; and when two parameters were used together, the accuracy and specificity were higher than that using the criteria of Light et al.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Useful tests on pleural fluid that distinguish transudates from exudates.

We aimed to compare the classic Light's criteria with different testing strategies in an effort to improve the accuracy of pleural fluid (PF) categorization. Thirty-two patients with transudates and 140 with exudates on the basis of their clinical diagnosis were entered into the study. We examined the discriminative properties of 10 analytes in the identification of PF, both singly and in combination with an 'or' rule, to see which was best in distinguishing a transudate from an exudate. A combination of PF lactate dehydrogenase (LD) > 307 U/L (two-thirds of the upper limit of the serum LD reference range) with either PF cholesterol > 1.55 mmol/L or PF to serum protein ratio > 0.5 had a diagnostic accuracy similar to that of Light's criteria. We suggest the use of PF LD and cholesterol in combination as an alternative method for distinguishing pleural transudates from exudates. This test combination avoids the need for venepuncture and the simultaneous collection of a blood sample.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Comparative study of penetration of lomefloxacin and ceftriaxone into transudative and exudative pleural effusion.

We investigated the transpleural penetration of lomefloxacin (LFLX) and ceftriaxone (CTRX). LFLX (200 mg) was administered orally to three patients with transudative fluid and four with exudative fluid, and 2 g of CTRX was administered by drip infusion to four patients with transudative fluid and three with exudative fluid. For both groups that received LFLX and CTRX, blood samples were drawn at time zero and 1, 2, and 6 h after drug administration. Thoracocentesis of each group was performed at 6 h after drug administration. The mean ratios of concentrations in pleural fluid/maximum concentrations in serum (P/S max) of LFLX were 66% in patients with transudative fluid and 69% in patients with exudative fluid. The mean ratios of P/S max of CTRX were 9.1% in patients with transudative fluid and 13.5% in patients with exudative fluid. The P/S max ratios for the penetration of LFLX were five to six times higher than those for CTRX. In addition, there was less differentiation in concentrations of LFLX in pleural fluid between the transudative and exudative effusions than there was in the concentrations of CTRX.

Aged↗
PubMed1984

Superiority of the serum-ascites albumin difference over the ascites total protein concentration in separation of "transudative" and "exudative" ascites.

The serum-ascites albumin difference, an index of the serum-ascites oncotic pressure difference, correlates directly with the pressure gradient between the portal capillaries and the peritoneal cavity. This test was compared with the ascites total protein concentration in the separation of "transudative" and "exudative" ascites. The serum-ascites albumin difference was large in patients with transudative ascites (1.6 +/- 0.5 g/dl) and small in patients with exudative ascites (0.6 +/- 0.4 g/dl, p less than 0.001) and provided significantly better discrimination of these categories than did the ascites total protein concentration. The serum-ascites albumin difference was especially useful in the separation of cardiac ascites, which usually has a high total protein concentration, from high protein exudative ascites. The serum-ascites albumin difference did not provide perfect discrimination of any category, however; in patients with mixed causes of ascites, this difference tended to be large, resembling ordinary transudative ascites, a potential source of diagnostic error. Nevertheless, the serum-ascites albumin difference has superior discriminatory power and should replace the ascites total protein concentration in the routine diagnostic examination of ascites.

Ascites↗