PubMed1992
In the first 187 consecutive alumina-alumina combination hip arthroplasties performed from 1977 to 1979, both components were cemented with conventional techniques. At ten-year follow-up evaluation, 87 patients were reviewed or interviewed by telephone, 37 were dead, 39 were lost to follow-up evaluation, and 24 failures were reoperated on before the end of ten years. The major cause of failure was aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (15 failures). Fracture of the socket and of the femoral head occurred in five patients in this series. However, these complications were not seen with components manufactured after 1979. At the end of ten years, survivorship analysis depicted a 82.59% survival rate when reoperation was considered as failure and a 88.57% rate when reoperation for aseptic loosening was considered as failure. The femoral component had a 99.16% survival rate and the acetabular component had an 88.57% survival rate when reoperation for aseptic loosening was considered as failure. Age, appearance of a two- or three-zone demarcation at the intermediate follow-up evaluation, and outer diameter of the acetabular component were the major parameters influencing the results. Better results observed in the population younger than 50 years of age may be related to the small amount of wear debris produced by the alumina-alumina combination. This combination in hip prosthesis is secure, but should be implanted in young and active patients; the outer diameter of the acetabular component must be at least 50 mm. The major problem that remains is the socket's fixation. It could be improved by a design modification, by choosing another mode of fixation, or both.