SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Levodopa”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Long term treatment and disease severity change brain responses to levodopa in Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVES: Degeneration of nigrostriatal neurons and subsequent striatal dopamine deficiency produce many of the symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD). Initially restoration of striatal dopamine with oral levodopa provides substantial benefit, but with long term treatment and disease progression, levodopa can elicit additional clinical symptoms, reflecting altered effects of levodopa in the brain. The authors examined whether long term treatment affects the brain's response to levodopa in the absence of these altered clinical responses to levodopa. METHODS: Positron emission tomography (PET) measurements were used of brain-blood flow before and after an acute dose of levodopa in three groups: PD patients treated long term with levodopa without levodopa induced dyskinesias, levodopa naive PD patients, and controls. RESULTS: It was found that the PD group treated long term responded to acute levodopa differently from controls in left sensorimotor and left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. In both regions, the treated PD group had decreased blood flow whereas the control group had increased blood flow in response to levodopa. Levodopa naive PD patients had little or no response to levodopa in these regions. Within the treated PD group, severity of parkinsonism correlated with the degree of abnormality of the sensorimotor cortex response, but not with the prefrontal response. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that long term levodopa treatment and disease severity affect the physiology of dopaminergic pathways, producing altered responses to levodopa in brain regions associated with motor function.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1993

Levodopa therapy and survival in idiopathic Parkinson's disease: Olmsted County project.

We studied survival in all Olmsted County Parkinson's disease (PD) patients seen at the Mayo Clinic from 1964 to 1978, attempting to answer two questions: (1) What effect does levodopa have on survival in PD? and (2) Does the timing of levodopa administration influence survival? We chose this period because it allowed us to study patient records with a spectrum of disease durations before levodopa treatment; in many patients, the treatment delay was exclusively due to levodopa being unavailable prior to 1969. Mortality of the entire PD cohort (N = 179; 61% levodopa-treated) was greater than that of the general population (matched chronologically, geographically, and by age and gender). Lower age at onset of motor symptoms, lower Hoehn and Yahr stage at first neurologic visit for parkinsonism, and treatment with levodopa were all independent predictors of improved survival. Using a time-dependent Cox regression model, we assessed the impact of the timing of levodopa administration during the course of illness on mortality, while statistically controlling for other factors (ie, patient selection for levodopa treatment, and independent predictors of survival). Risk of death following initiation of levodopa was significantly reduced (p < 0.001), regardless of pre-levodopa duration of illness. This reduction gradually diminished over a period of 4 years on levodopa, but continued to be significantly reduced. After 4 years, increasing survival benefit again progressively accrued over time to at least 17 years of levodopa treatment (p < 0.001). At no point in time was levodopa treatment associated with increased mortality, arguing against substantial levodopa toxicity. However, despite levodopa-improved survival, mortality continues to be increased in PD relative to the general population.

Carbidopa↗

PubMed2001

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship of levodopa with and without tolcapone in patients with Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of administration of the catechol-Omethyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor tolcapone on the concentration-effect relationship of levodopa in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease and on-off fluctuations. DESIGN: Nonblind single-group 2-period pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: 12 patients, mean age 59 years, with idiopathic Parkinson's disease and response fluctuations. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics [plasma concentrations of levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa (3-OMD)] and motor effects [global score of the Columbia University Rating Scale (CURSsigma)] of levodopa (plus the peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor benserazide 1:4) were determined for 4 consecutive dosage intervals (4 hours each, starting at 8.00am) in 12 patients before (day 1) and during (day 8) coadministration of tolcapone 100 mg 3 times daily for 7 days. RESULTS: Under tolcapone, exposure to levodopa [area under the plasma concentration-time for the dosage interval (AUCt)] observed for the separate doses increased by 1.6- to 2.2-fold, and peak plasma drug concentrations (Cmax) increased by 1.1 - to 2.1 -fold. 3-OMD concentrations at day 8 were reduced to about 20% of the values at day 1. At baseline (day 1, before the first levodopa dose), CURSsigma averaged 40 +/- 10 points. After the first levodopa dose. CURSsigma declined to 20 +/- 9 points. At day 8. the predose CURSsigma decreased to a final score of 31 +/-13 points, and the maximal decline after the first levodopa dose was to a final score of 16 +/- 8 points. Population analysis (NONMEM) of the concentration-effect relationship of levodopa according to a sigmoidal Emax model and over all dosage intervals did not show differences in levodopa responsiveness with or without tolcapone. The population mean of the 50% effective concentration (EC50) of levodopa was 1350 microg/L with an standard error of the population parameter estimate of 18%: adding tolcapone treatment as a covariate did not significantly change the population fit. Circadian influences on levodopa respon- siveness were not evaluable by the NONMEM model due to overparametrisation, but visual inspection of plotted data did not suggest differences in the concentration-effect relationship between the 4 consecutive dosage intervals on days 1 and 8. CONCLUSIONS: The gain in clinical improvement with levodopa under tolcapone can be fully explained by tolcapone-induced changes of peripheral levodopa pharmacokinetics. We suggest that this interaction study, performed in patients and using clinical data, excludes any central effects of tolcapone or any inhibiting effect of 3-OMD on levodopa permeation through the blood-brain barrier, which otherwise would have led to a decrease in the EC50 of levodopa.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

LY293558, an AMPA glutamate receptor antagonist, prevents and reverses levodopa-induced motor alterations in Parkinsonian rats.

To evaluate the possible involvement of glutamate AMPA receptor-mediated mechanisms in levodopa-induced motor fluctuations, we investigated the effects of LY293558, a competitive AMPA receptor antagonist, on levodopa-induced motor alterations in rats with unilateral 6-OHDA lesion. Acute and chronic administration of LY293558 was studied to evaluate the possible reversion or prevention of these levodopa effects. In the first set of experiments, rats were treated with levodopa (25 mg/kg with benserazide, twice daily, i.p.) for 22 days and on day 23 LY293558 (5 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered immediately before levodopa. In the second set of experiments, rats were treated daily for 22 days with levodopa and LY293558 (5 mg/kg, twice daily, i.p.). In the third set of experiments, the effect of LY293558 (5 mg/kg, i.p.) administration on selective dopamine D-1 (SKF38393, 1.5 mg/kg, s.c.) and D-2 agonist (quinpirole, 0.1 mg/kg, i.p.)-induced rotational behavior after daily levodopa treatment was studied. The duration of the rotational behavior induced by chronic levodopa decreased by 30% after 22 days. Acute administration of LY293558 on day 23 reversed this effect. The group of animals that were chronically treated with levodopa and LY293558 did not show the decrease in this motor response duration. Chronic levodopa treatment attenuated the rotational response to the D-1 agonist SKF38393 and increased the response to the D-2 agonist quinpirole. LY293558 did not reverse the effect of levodopa on rotational behavior induced by the D-1 agonist but significantly reduced the rotational response to the D-2 agonist in levodopa-treated animals by 40%. Our results demonstrate that an AMPA receptor antagonist reverses and prevents levodopa-induced motor alterations in parkinsonian rats and that this effect on motor fluctuations induced by chronic levodopa is probably due to a modulation of the indirect output pathway of the basal ganglia.

Adrenergic Agents↗

PubMed1996

Dose-related effects of continuous levodopa infusion in rats with unilateral lesions of the substantia nigra.

Preclinical studies in rats have demonstrated markedly different effects of intermittent and continuous levodopa administration on many biochemical and functional parameters yet the dose regimens employed have not been fully evaluated. In this study, rats with unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine nigral lesions were administered levodopa (0-1200 mg/kg/day) and benserazide (25 mg/kg/day) subcutaneously via osmotic minipump and studied 20-22 h later for rotational behavior, striatal dopamine concentration, and regional cerebral glucose utilization (RCGU). Levodopa infusion at 100 mg/kg/day resulted in minimal rotation and minimal striatal dopamine replacement but did increase RCGU in the subthalamic nucleus and decrease RCGU in the lateral habenula, consistent with a selective inhibition of the striatopallidal GABAergic (indirect striatal output) pathway. Levodopa infusion at 100 mg/kg/day did not significantly increase RCGU in the entopeduncular nucleus (EP) and substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr), as does the acute injection of levodopa (25-50 mg/kg), indicating that this levodopa dose elicits only part of the spectrum of metabolic effects elicited by acute levodopa injection. Higher doses of levodopa (400-1200 mg/kg/day) resulted in moderate rates of rotation, dose-dependent increases in striatal dopamine, and increased RCGU in the EP and SNr, consistent with activation of the striatonigral GABAergic (direct striatal output) pathway. In the EP and SNr, the two major output nuclei of the basal ganglia, levodopa infusion at 800 and 1200 mg/kg/day reproduced the metabolic effects elicited by acute injection of levodopa. These results demonstrate, for the first time, dose-dependent effects of levodopa on distinct populations of striatal output neurons which may be relevant to the pathogenesis of levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease. The minimal dopamine replacement and partial functional effects elicited by levodopa infusion at 100 mg/kg/day indicate the need for caution in the interpretation of prior studies of continuous levodopa infusion which employed this dose.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Population pharmacokinetics of levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with tolcapone.

OBJECTIVE: To use pharmacostatistical models to evaluate the overall exposure of patients with Parkinson's disease to levodopa in the presence and absence of tolcapone. METHODS: Four hundred twelve patients with Parkinson's disease with fluctuating and nonfluctuating responses to levodopa participated in three multicentered, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-finding studies and received either placebo or tolcapone in addition to levodopa-decarboxylase inhibitor therapy. Sparse blood samples were obtained from 393 patients for levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa assay, and the data were analyzed with use of the NONMEM program. RESULTS: The fraction of levodopa metabolized to 3-O-methyldopa was substantially reduced by the co-administration of tolcapone (by 65%, 74%, and 84% with tolcapone doses of 50, 200, and 400 mg, respectively, in fluctuators, and by 50% and 90% with doses of 200 and 400 mg, respectively, in nonfluctuators). This led to an overall reduction in levodopa clearance (CL) of approximately 15% to 25% in fluctuators and 20% to 30% in nonfluctuators. Because this was partly compensated for by a reduction in levodopa dose in these studies, the total daily exposure of patients to levodopa was only slightly increased (11% to 16%). The peak-trough fluctuations of plasma levodopa (Cmax-Cmin) were reduced in both populations in a dose-dependent fashion. CONCLUSIONS: Tolcapone effectively inhibited the formation of 3-O-methyldopa and resulted in a decrease in levodopa CL. The consequent increase in levodopa bioavailability was mostly offset by reductions in levodopa dose. It is possible that decreased fluctuations in plasma levodopa concentrations rather than increased levodopa exposure may explain the clinical benefits obtained with tolcapone.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Pharmacokinetic model of oral levodopa and role of carbidopa in parkinsonian patients.

A pharmacokinetic model of oral levodopa is proposed to elucidate the effects of carbidopa on the pharmacokinetics of levodopa. The propriety of the model was evaluated by simultaneous computer Multi-Line fitting for the plasma concentration-time data of levodopa and dopamine-3-O-sulfate (DA-S), a major metabolite of levodopa, after oral administration of three different levodopa doses to parkinsonian patients. Plasma profiles of levodopa and DA-S were also determined in 12 parkinsonian patients during daily oral administration of Neodopaston, a levodopa preparation containing carbidopa in tablet form. We investigated the role of carbidopa by comparing the populational mean parameters calculated in the levodopa alone model with those obtained in patients coadministered levodopa and carbidopa. The results indicated that the pharmacokinetics of levodopa coadministered with carbidopa were dose-independent and that carbidopa reduces the first-pass metabolism of levodopa in the gut wall to less than 10% of the dose absorbed, and decreases the systemic clearance of levodopa by 35-39%. The proposed pharmacokinetic model and the evaluation of carbidopa in this study will provide useful information for the development of drug delivery systems for levodopa or catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors, for further stabilization of plasma concentrations of levodopa in parkinsonian patients.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2006

A new look at levodopa based on the ELLDOPA study.

Levodopa has been the gold standard for Parkinson's disease (PD) therapy since it was successfully introduced in 1967. But in the years since then, after recognizing that levodopa often leads to the motor complications of wearing-off and dyskinesias, there have been debates among clinicians as to when levodopa therapy should be started. Delaying therapy was advocated for the purpose of delaying the development of these motor complications. This became more popular as the dopamine agonists became available. Although less potent than levodopa in ameliorating the symptoms of PD, they were much less likely to produce the unwanted motor complications, even though they had their own adverse effects. When it was recognized that dopamine, itself, might be a factor leading to the death of dopaminergic neurons through its contributing to the formation of oxyradicals, a new concern arose, namely that levodopa, through its conversion to brain dopamine, might add to the existing oxidative stress and possibly enhance neurodegeneration of dopaminergic neurons. Though widely debated and without definite evidence, this possibility was sufficient to make some clinicians have further reason to delay the start of levodopa therapy. The ELLDOPA study was created to test this hypothesis. The clinical component of the study failed to find an enhancement of PD symptoms after levodopa was withdrawn following 40 weeks of levodopa therapy. Rather, the clinical results indicated that the symptoms had progressed much less than placebo, and in a dose-response manner. This suggests that levodopa may actually have neuroprotective properties. The uncertainty that a 2-week withdrawal of levodopa may not have entirely eliminated its symptomatic benefit and the discordant results of the neuroimaging component of the ELLDOPA study have created even more uncertainty that levodopa is neuroprotective. A survey of neurologists who treat PD patients showed that the vast majority of these clinicians do not believe levodopa is neuroprotective, and they remain concerned about the drug's likelihood of inducing motor complications. Thus, the ELLDOPA study failed to change the treating pattern of PD, and the clinicians require more convincing evidence of either neuroprotection or neurotoxicity of levodopa before they would alter their treatment approach.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes during the first four years of levodopa treatment in Parkinson's disease.

The purpose of this analysis is to describe how levodopa pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters change over the first 4 years of long-term levodopa treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease. Twenty previously untreated Parkinsonian patients were admitted to the general clinical research center (GCRC) for 4 days at the beginning of long-term levodopa therapy and 6, 12, 24 and 48 months later. On each GCRC admission, patients received a 2 hr IV infusion of levodopa on day 1 and day 4 with no oral levodopa between the infusions. After the first GCRC admission patients were treated with oral levodopa dosed for optimal control of Parkinsonism. Motor function was measured by finger tapping rate. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model incorporating 3 effect compartments was used to fit the individual plasma levodopa concentrations and tapping rates. Motor function before the first levodopa infusion (E0(1)) improved over the first 20 months and subsequently returned to the initial baseline at the start of the study. A similar pattern was seen in motor function before the second infusion (E0(2)) after the 3 days levodopa withdrawal, with a decline predicted to fall below the initial baseline at the start of the study by 6 years. Eight patients showed an increase in maximum tapping rate with levodopa (E(max)) approaching a steady state after 16 months. Ten patients showed an increase in E(max) with a peak at 31 months. One patient showed a linear decrease and another patient did not change over the 48 months. Longitudinal progress models were used to describe the time course of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters over 4 years. Peak treatment benefit, defined as the difference between E(max) and E0(1) or E0(2) (D(max)1 or D(max)2), increased with time particularly after the 3-day levodopa withdrawal. Deterioration of pre-dose motor function (E0) as disease progresses coupled with a greater amplitude of response due to levodopa (D(max)) could be a key factor contributing to motor fluctuations associated with long-term levodopa treatment.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1990

The effect of benserazide on the peripheral and central distribution and metabolism of levodopa after acute and chronic administration in the rat.

1. The effects of levodopa alone (50 mg kg-1) and levodopa (10 mg kg-1) plus benserazide (50 mg kg-1) were tested on the levels of dopa, dopamine, 3-methoxytyrosine (3-MT), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA), measured by h.p.l.c. with electrochemical detection, in samples of plasma, CSF, urine, striatum and hypothalamus of rats taken 30 min after injection. Levodopa plus benserazide produced significantly higher levels of dopa in plasma and brain than levodopa alone and reduced the peripheral synthesis and metabolism of dopamine. 2. When given chronically over 6 weeks the advantages of adding benserazide (50 mg kg-1 day-1) to levodopa (40 mg kg-1 day-1) were less marked and although more dopamine was present in the striatum than with levodopa given alone (200 mg kg-1 day-1) there was no evidence of any increase in its metabolites (HVA and DOPAC) and therefore of its turnover and utilisation. 3. The most striking effect of chronic treatment with levodopa plus benserazide was the appearance of large quantities of 3-MT in plasma, CSF and brain. 4. When levodopa alone, or levodopa plus benserazide, was given as an acute challenge to animals receiving the same treatment chronically, it was found that levodopa alone still produced increases in striatal dopamine, DOPAC and HVA in those animals dosed chronically on levodopa, but it was less effective in this respect when given with benserazide to the animals dosed with levodopa plus benserazide. 5. It is concluded that this difference in levodopa distribution may depend on the persistence in benserazide-treated animals of 3-MT, which has a long half-life and may compete with dopa for transport into the blood and brain. 6. The implication of these findings to the treatment of Parkinsonism is discussed.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

AMPA receptor blockade improves levodopa-induced dyskinesia in MPTP monkeys.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contribution of amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole proprionic acid (AMPA) glutamate receptors to the pathogenesis of parkinsonian signs and levodopa-induced dyskinesias. BACKGROUND: Motor fluctuations and dyskinesias reflect, in part, altered function of glutamate receptors of the NMDA subtype. The possible role of AMPA receptors, however, has not yet been examined. METHODS: The authors compared the ability of an AMPA agonist (CX516) and a noncompetitive AMPA antagonist (LY300164) to alter parkinsonian symptoms and levodopa-induced dyskinesia in MPTP-lesioned monkeys. Eight levodopa-treated parkinsonian monkeys received rising doses of each drug, first in monotherapy and then in combination with low-, medium-, and high-dose levodopa. RESULTS: CX516 alone, as well as when combined with low-dose levodopa, did not affect motor activity but induced dyskinesia. Moreover, following injection of the higher doses of levodopa, it increased levodopa-induced dyskinesia by up to 52% (p < 0.05). LY300164 potentiated the motor activating effects of low-dose levodopa, increasing motor activity by as much as 86% (p < 0.05), and that of medium-dose levodopa as much as 54% (p < 0.05). At the same time, LY300164 decreased levodopa-induced dyskinesia by up to 40% (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: AMPA receptor upregulation may contribute to the expression of levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Conceivably, noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonists could be useful, alone or in combination with NMDA antagonists, in the treatment of PD, by enhancing the antiparkinsonian effects of levodopa without increasing and possibly even decreasing levodopa-induced dyskinesia.

1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine↗

PubMed1993

[Transmitter-like release and pharmacological activities of levodopa].

Levodopa was released by depolarizing stimuli from rat striata in a transmitter-like manner in vitro and in vivo. Exogenous nanomolar levodopa stereoselectively facilitated the release of dopamine and noradrenaline via presynaptic beta-adrenoceptors in brain slices even under inhibition of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase. This facilitation was competitively antagonized by levodopa methyl ester, whereas it was non-competitively antagonized by propranolol. Furthermore, picomolar levodopa stereoselectively potentiated the isoproterenol-induced facilitation of the noradrenaline release. Levodopa methyl ester selectively antagonized this potentiation, while propranolol antagonized both the facilitation by isoproterenol alone and its potentiation by levodopa. The recognition site for levodopa could be differentiated from the carrier proteins for levodopa transport, because nanomolar levodopa methyl ester abolished the levodopa-induced facilitation of the noradrenaline release, whereas a 30 times higher concentration of L-phenylalanine or L-leucine produced no antagonism. Microinjection of levodopa into the nucleus tractus solitarii led to dose-dependent decreases in arterial blood pressure and heart rate in rats in a levodopa methyl ester-sensitive manner. Based on these findings, we propose that levodopa itself is an endogenous neurotransmitter in the CNS.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Levodopa in Parkinson's disease: neurotoxicity issue laid to rest?

Orally administered levodopa remains the most effective symptomatic treatment for Parkinson's disease. The introduction of levodopa therapy is often delayed, however, because of the fear that it might be toxic for the remaining dopaminergic neurons, and thus accelerate the deterioration of the patient's condition. Evidence for levodopa toxicity comes mainly from in vitro studies which have demonstrated that levodopa can damage dopaminergic neurons by a mechanism that probably involves oxidative stress. It is widely accepted, however, that levodopa is not toxic for healthy animals and humans who do not have Parkinson's disease. It has been argued that the lesioned mesostriatal dopaminergic system could be more vulnerable to levodopa-induced toxicity, because the brain extracellular concentrations attained by levodopa are higher when the dopaminergic system is damaged, and remaining dopaminergic neurons experience a process of compensatory hyperactivity. Evidence for in vivo levodopa toxicity in animal models of Parkinson's disease is scarce and contradictory. A comprehensive recent study failed to find any evidence of levodopa toxicity in rats with either moderate or severe lesions of the mesostriatal dopaminergic system. Concerning the hypothesis of toxicity, some recent reports have shown that levodopa can have trophic effects on dopaminergic neurons in vitro, and our own work has shown that long term levodopa therapy promotes recovery of striatal dopaminergic markers in rats with moderate nigrostriatal lesions. Given that neither epidemiological nor clinical studies have ever provided evidence to support that long term levodopa administration can accelerate the progression of Parkinson's disease, we believe that levodopa therapy should not be delayed on the basis of an unconfirmed hypothesis.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Gastric emptying in healthy volunteers after multiple doses of levodopa.

1. Oral levodopa frequently produces an episodic delay in gastric emptying which leads to multiple peak concentrations of the drug in plasma. We have studied the effects of multiple dosing of levodopa on gastric emptying and levodopa absorption in eight healthy young volunteers in a randomised two-way cross-over study. 2. The plasma concentration-time curves for levodopa were measured after three oral doses of 125 mg given at 2 h intervals and compared with the concentration-time curve for levodopa following administration of two doses of placebo and a single oral dose of 125 mg. 3. A low incidence of multiple peak plasma concentrations of levodopa was detected after all doses of levodopa. The area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC) for the final dose of levodopa (150.8 +/- 22.0 micrograms ml-1 min) was lower than for the two preceding doses (205.7 +/- 41.8 and 199.5 +/- 51.8 micrograms ml-1 min) but not different from that of the single dose given at the same time of day (141.7 +/- 29.1 micrograms ml-1 min). This indicates that the lower AUC of the final dose of levodopa was related to the time of administration and not a result of the two preceding doses. 4. The absence of any significant effects of preceding doses of levodopa on gastric emptying was confirmed a) by co-administration of soluble paracetamol, as a marker of gastric emptying, with the second dose of levodopa or placebo and b) by co-administration of radiolabelled DTPA and gamma-camera imaging with the final dose of levodopa on the multiple dosing day and the single dose of levodopa on the placebo day.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acetaminophen↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Pharmacodynamics of levodopa coadministered with apomorphine in parkinsonian patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuations.

The modification of the pharmacodynamic response to a single oral dose of levodopa/benserazide by the coadministration of the dopamine agonist apomorphine was investigated in parkinsonian patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuations. The relation between levodopa plasma concentrations and motor response was examined in a double-blind, randomized, crossover design in 10 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease with end-of-dose motor fluctuations. Oral single-dose challenges with 100 mg of levodopa/25 mg of benserazide were carried out twice in each patient, under coadministration with apomorphine (1 mg/h) or 0.9% saline (placebo) subcutaneously. The sum scores (sigma score) of the Columbia University Rating Scale (CURS) were used as effect parameters for pharmacodynamic assessment. A sigmoidal Emax model was fitted to the data using a semiparametric pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic approach. Levodopa pharmacokinetics were not significantly modified by the coadministration of apomorphine. The area under the curve was 1599 +/- 615 ng.ml-1 h. (levodopa + saline) and 1821 +/- 625 ng.ml-1.h (levodopa + apomorphine). Cmax was 1094 +/- 476 ng.ml-1 (levodopa + saline) and 1129 +/- 435 ng.ml-1 (levodopa + apomorphine). Under both experimental regimens, the maximum clinical response to levodopa (Emax) yielded a decrease in the CURS sigma rating of about 20 score points. Estimates of the EC50 of levodopa decreased significantly from 430 +/- 163 ng.ml-1 (levodopa + saline) to 315 +/- 123 ng+ml-1 (levodopa + apomorphine) (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 -0.98, point estimator 0.75). The mean duration of the motor response rose from 1.9 +/- 0.5 h (levodopa + saline) to 3.0 +/- 0.9 h (levodopa + apomorphine (95% CI 1.23 to 2.06, point estimator 1.60). Thus, a reduction of the threshold levels for levodopa (EC50) was accompanied by approximately 50% gain in on-phase duration, but not in an increased magnitude of the motor response (Emax).

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Intermittent vs continuous levodopa administration in patients with advanced Parkinson disease: a clinical and pharmacokinetic study.

BACKGROUND: Levodopa-related motor complications can be an important source of disability for patients with advanced Parkinson disease. Current evidence suggests that these motor complications are related to the relatively short half-life of levodopa and its potential to induce pulsatile stimulation of striatal dopamine receptors. Motor complications can be diminished with a continuous infusion of levodopa. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the specific pharmacokinetic changes associated with the benefits of levodopa infusion. DESIGN: We performed an open-label study in 6 patients with Parkinson disease who experienced severe motor complications while receiving standard oral formulations of levodopa/carbidopa. Patients were subsequently treated for 6 months with continuous daytime intraintestinal infusions of levodopa methyl ester. Levodopa pharmacokinetic studies were performed at baseline and 6 months in 3 of these patients. RESULTS: Compared with treatment with intermittent doses of a standard oral formulation of levodopa, continuous infusion provided significant improvement in both "off periods" and dyskinesia. Results of plasma pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated that compared with oral administration, continuous levodopa infusion was associated with a significant increase in the levodopa area under the curve and avoided the low plasma trough levels seen with oral drug administration. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that a continuous levodopa infusion is associated with reduced motor complications compared with the standard oral formulation of the drug in patients with advanced PD. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrate that reduced motor complications are associated with avoiding low plasma levodopa trough levels and are not adversely affected by relatively high plasma levodopa concentrations. We propose that if levodopa/carbidopa could be administered orally in a manner that mirrors the pharmacokinetic pattern of the infusion, it might lead to a similar reduction in motor complications.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2000

Pramipexole vs levodopa as initial treatment for Parkinson disease: A randomized controlled trial. Parkinson Study Group.

CONTEXT: Pramipexole and levodopa both ameliorate the motor symptoms of early Parkinson disease (PD), but no controlled studies have compared long-term outcomes after initiating dopaminergic therapy with pramipexole vs levodopa. OBJECTIVE: To compare the development of dopaminergic motor complications after initial treatment of early PD with pramipexole vs levodopa. DESIGN: Multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Academic movement disorders clinics at 22 sites in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: Three hundred one patients with early PD who required dopaminergic therapy to treat emerging disability, enrolled between October 1996 and August 1997. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomly assigned to receive pramipexole, 0.5 mg 3 times per day, with levodopa placebo (n = 151); or carbidopa/levodopa, 25/100 mg 3 times per day, with pramipexole placebo (n = 150). For patients with residual disability, the dosage was escalated during the first 10 weeks. From week 11 to month 23.5, investigators were permitted to add open-label levodopa to treat continuing or emerging disability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to the first occurrence of any of 3 dopaminergic complications: wearing off, dyskinesias, or on-off motor fluctuations; changes in scores on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), assessed at baseline and follow-up evaluations; and, in a subgroup of 82 subjects evaluated at baseline and 23.5 months, ratio of specific to nondisplaceable striatal iodine 123 2-beta-carboxymethoxy-3-beta-(4-iodophenyl)tropane (beta-CIT) uptake on single photon emission computed tomography imaging of the dopamine transporter. RESULTS: Initial pramipexole treatment resulted in significantly less development of wearing off, dyskinesias, or on-off motor fluctuations (28%) compared with levodopa (51%) (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0. 30-0.66; P<.001). The mean improvement in total UPDRS score from baseline to 23.5 months was greater in the levodopa group than in the pramipexole group (9.2 vs 4.5 points; P<.001). Somnolence was more common in pramipexole-treated patients than in levodopa-treated patients (32.4% vs 17.3%; P =.003), and the difference was seen during the escalation phase of treatment. In the subgroup study, patients treated initially with pramipexole (n = 39) showed a mean (SD) decline of 20.0% (14.2%) in striatal beta-CIT uptake compared with a 24.8% (14.4%) decline in subjects treated initially with levodopa (n = 39; P =.15). CONCLUSIONS: Fewer patients receiving initial treatment for PD with pramipexole developed dopaminergic motor complications than with levodopa therapy. Despite supplementation with open-label levodopa in both groups, the levodopa-treated group had a greater improvement in total UPDRS compared with the pramipexole group. JAMA. 2000;284:1931-1938.

Antiparkinson Agents↗

PubMed2002

Adenosine A2A antagonism reverses levodopa-induced motor alterations in hemiparkinsonian rats.

To evaluate the possible involvement of adenosine A(2A) receptor-mediated mechanisms in levodopa-induced motor fluctuations, we investigated the effects of CSC (8-(3-chlorostryryl) caffeine), a selective adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist, on levodopa-induced motor alterations in rats with unilateral 6-OHDA lesion. Acute and chronic administration of CSC was studied to evaluate the possible reversion or prevention of these levodopa effects. In a first set of experiments, rats were treated with levodopa (25 mg/kg with benserazide, twice daily, i.p.) for 22 days and on day 23 CSC (5 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered immediately before levodopa. In a second set of experiments, rats were treated daily for 22 days with levodopa and CSC (5 mg/kg/day, i.p.). The duration of the rotational behavior induced by chronic levodopa decreased after 22 days (P < 0.05). Acute administration of CSC on day 23 reversed levodopa-induced shortening in motor response duration (P < 0.01). Chronic CSC administration did not prevent the shortening in response duration induced by levodopa. Our results demonstrate that the adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist CSC reverses but does not prevent levodopa-induced motor alterations in parkinsonian rats. These results suggest a role for adenosine A(2A) receptor-mediated mechanisms in the pathophysiology of levodopa-induced motor response complications. These findings suggest that the antagonism of adenosine A(2A) receptors might confer clinical benefit to parkinsonian patients under levodopa therapy suffering from motor complication syndrome.

Animals↗