SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “NORTRIPTYLINE”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

PubMed1985

Relationship of free nortriptyline levels to therapeutic response.

The relationship between the free plasma concentration of nortriptyline and therapeutic response was examined. Eighteen depressed inpatients were treated for 21 days with steady state total nortriptyline plasma concentrations between 50-150 ng/ml. Steady state free nortriptyline concentrations were measured. The therapeutic nortriptyline response was measured by administering the Hamilton and the Carroll Rating scales at day zero and day 21. Statistical relationships between free levels of drug and clinical response were found to be insignificant. Qualitative assessment of the data suggest that free serum levels of nortriptyline in excess of 10 ng/ml may have an inhibitory effect on clinical response.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1980

Neuropharmacological properties of amitriptyline, nortriptyline and their metabolites.

Amitriptyline, nortriptyline and their metabolites, desmethylnortriptyline, cis and trans 10-hydroxyamitriptyline, cis and trans 10-hydroxynortriptyline and amitriptyline-N-oxide, have been tested for inhibitory effect on the uptake of serotonin (rabbit thrombocytes in vitro) and noradrenaline (mouse atria in vitro and mouse heart in vivo), for anticholinergic activity (guinea-pig ileum in vitro) and for antagonism against tetrabenazine induced inactivity as well as apomorphine and 5-hydroxytryptophan potentiating effect in mice. Amitriptyline inhibits serotonin and noradrenaline uptake equally, whereas nortriptyline is a more potent inhibitor of noradrenaline than of serotonin uptake. The metabolites resemble nortriptyline in this respect. The 10-hydroxylated metabolites are equipotent with amitriptyline as regards noradrenaline uptake inhibition. All the metabolites are less anticholinergic than amitriptyline and nortriptyline. The in vitro results are reflected in the in vivo behavioural tests, although some discrepancies are found, probably due to differences in absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. The importance of knowledge concerning pharmacological properties of the metabolites in comparison with amitriptyline and nortriptyline for correlating plasma levels of these and their metabolites to clinical outcome is discussed.

Amitriptyline↗

PubMed2006

Inhibition of astroglial inwardly rectifying Kir4.1 channels by a tricyclic antidepressant, nortriptyline.

The inwardly rectifying K(+) (Kir) channel Kir4.1 is responsible for astroglial K(+) buffering. We examined the effects of nortriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA), on Kir4.1 channel currents heterologously expressed in HEK293T cells, using a whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Nortriptyline (3-300 microM) reversibly inhibited Kir4.1 currents in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas it marginally affected neuronal Kir2.1 currents. The inhibition of Kir4.1 channels by nortriptyline depended on the voltage difference from the K(+) equilibrium potential (E(K)), with greater potency at more positive potentials. Blocking kinetics of the drug could be described by first-order kinetics, where dissociation of the drug slowed down and association accelerated as the membrane was depolarized. The dissociation constant (K(d)) of nortriptyline for Kir4.1 inhibition was 28.1 microM at E(K). Other TCAs, such as amitriptyline, desipramine, and imipramine, also inhibited Kir4.1 currents in a similar voltage-dependent fashion. This study shows for the first time that nortriptyline and related TCAs cause a concentration-, voltage-, and time-dependent inhibition of astroglial K(+)-buffering Kir4.1 channels, which might be involved in therapeutic and/or adverse actions of the drugs.

Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic↗

PubMed1969

Steady-state plasma levels of nortriptyline in twins: influence of genetic factors and drug therapy.

Nineteen identical (monozygotic) and 20 fraternal (dizygotic) sets of twins between 45 and 51 years of age were given nortriptyline orally in doses of 0.2 mg./kg. body weight three times daily for eight days. The steady-state plasma concentrations of nortriptyline were calculated from the mean of the determinations for days 6, 7, and 8. Identical twins, not treated with other drugs, achieved similar steady-state plasma concentrations of nortriptyline in contrast to fraternal twins who were not given other drugs. The intrapair similarity in steady-state plasma concentrations was not found in identical twins simultaneously treated with various drugs during the experiment. Identical and fraternal twins treated with drugs containing barbiturates had considerably lower steady-state plasma concentrations of nortriptyline compared with untreated twins.It is concluded that most of the variability in nor-triptyline steady-state plasma concentration between persons who have not received drugs is genetically determined. Exposure to other drugs also influences the steady-state plasma concentration of nortriptyline, which in a given patient may therefore be determined by a resultant of genetic and environmental factors.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed1980

ECG changes during treatment with nortriptyline in a once-a-day dosage.

In 21 patients suffering from endogenous depression and given nortriptyline 150 mg/day for 4 weeks in a once-a-day dosage an electrocardiographic study was made with ECG recordings at different times during the treatment. At the same time the plasma concentration of nortriptyline was determined. During the treatment the heart rate increased significantly, both at the minimum and the maximum concentration of nortriptyline. At the maximum concentration the PQ interval increased significantly. None of the patients developed an A-V block. 3 patients developed extrasystoles. None of the patients had severe subjective symptoms. All finished the trial as planned. There was no correlation between the plasma concentration of nortriptyline and the increase in heart rate. The trial revealed no serious cardiac influence during treatment with nortriptyline in a once-a-day dosage.

Depression↗

PubMed2000

Comparison of sertraline and nortriptyline in the treatment of major depressive disorder in late life.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of sertraline and nortriptyline for the treatment of major depressive disorder in older adults. METHOD: A double-blind, parallel group design was used to compare 210 outpatients, 60 years of age and older, who met DSM-III-R criteria for major depressive episode and had a minimum Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of 18. The patients were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of treatment with either sertraline (50-150 mg/day) or nortriptyline (25-100 mg/day). RESULTS: The safety profiles of the two treatments were similar except that nortriptyline treatment was associated with a significant increase in pulse rate, whereas sertraline was associated with a nonsignificant decrease. Efficacy of both drugs was similar for both treatments at all time points, with 71.6% (N=53 of 74) of the sertraline-treated patients and 61.4% (N=43 of 70) of the nortriptyline-treated patients achieving responder status by week 12. Time to response was also similar, with more than 75% of the improvement in scores on the Hamilton depression scale having occurred by week 6. Secondary efficacy measures (posttreatment measures of cognitive function, memory, and quality of life) revealed a significant advantage for sertraline treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Primary efficacy measures showed sertraline and nortriptyline to be similarly effective. With secondary outcome measures there was consistent evidence of an advantage for the sertraline-treated group. The clinical impact of these measures on the long-term well-being of elderly depressed patients should be examined in a study of maintenance treatment.

Age Factors↗

PubMed1999

Accelerating antidepressant response in geriatric depression: a post hoc comparison of combined sleep deprivation and paroxetine versus monotherapy with paroxetine, nortriptyline, or placebo.

Speed of response is an important clinical issue in the treatment of depressed elderly patients. Our objective was to compare rapid response rates in a study combining therapeutic sleep deprivation (TSD) with paroxetine with two earlier randomized, double-blind studies in late-life depression, one of paroxetine versus nortriptyline and another of nortriptyline versus placebo. We measured depressive symptoms with the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression (HRSD), defining rapid response as an HRSD < or = 10 by 2 weeks. With combination therapy (TSD + paroxetine), 9 of 13 patients (69%) experienced a rapid response. In the nortriptyline versus paroxetine study, nortriptyline brought about rapid response in 12 of 37 (32%) and paroxetine in 11 of 43 patients (26%). In the third study, rapid response to nortriptyline occurred in 10 of 41 patients (24%) and to placebo in 6 of 39 patients (15%). The overall chi square, including the rate of rapid response to placebo, was 14.87 (P = .005). The chi square on the four active treatment groups, excluding placebo, was 10.28 (P = .016). This preliminary observation suggests that combined therapy with TSD plus paroxetine may be twice as successful at achieving rapid response in elderly depressed patients than conventional monotherapy with medication or placebo. A prospective, placebo-controlled evaluation of this dual therapy is warranted.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Rates of in vivo methylation of desipramine and nortriptyline.

Routine monitoring of an 81-year-old man receiving treatment with nortriptyline for generalized anxiety disorder and depression revealed plasma concentrations of both amitriptyline and nortriptyline. In humans, the tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) tertiary amines imipramine and amitriptyline are typically metabolized by demethylation to the secondary active metabolites desipramine and nortriptyline, respectively. However, to our knowledge, methylation of secondary amine TCAs has been reported in only one case report of nortriptyline overdose and in two studies involving desipramine. In a retrospective analysis of patients from five Veterans Affairs medical centers, the rate of methylation of desipramine and nortriptyline was 8.9 % (five of 56 patients) and 14.6% (36 of 247), respectively. Possible explanations for methylation include genetic polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 metabolizing enzymes, polymorphism of amine N-methyltransferase enzyme, drug-drug interactions, smoking, and alcohol consumption. However, the mechanism by which methylation occurs is unclear and warrants further investigation. Awareness of the phenomenon could help in discouraging repeated laboratory tests and unnecessary adjustments of drug therapies, resulting in cost savings and better patient outcomes.

Aged, 80 and over↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Interaction of chlorpromazine and nortriptyline in patients with schizophrenia.

Seven male inpatients suffering from acute schizophrenia were treated with chlorpromazine elixir 100mg 8-hourly for 9 weeks. Nortriptyline 50mg 8-hourly was added during weeks 4, 5 and 6. Plasma chlorpromazine concentrations, antipyrine plasma half-life, blood pressure, pulse rate, pupil size, salivation, handwriting and clinical state were measured at weekly intervals. Plasma chlorpromazine concentrations rose when nortriptyline was added, and the antipyrine plasma half-life was prolonged. Blood pressure dropped on institution of chlorpromazine and dropped further with the addition of nortriptyline. The pulse rate rose in a parallel fashion. Pupil size, salivation and handwriting were diminished by chlorpromazine, but hardly affected further by nortriptyline. The addition of nortriptyline dramatically reversed the therapeutic actions of chlorpromazine, mainly through pharmacodynamic interaction. It is concluded that this combination is potentially deleterious, and must be used with care.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Quantitative pharmacogenetics of nortriptyline: a novel approach.

OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively model nortriptyline clearance as a function of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 genotype and to estimate the contribution of genotype to the interindividual variability in steady-state plasma concentration and metabolic clearance. DESIGN: Modelling study using data from two previously published studies. PARTICIPANTS: 20 healthy volunteers receiving single oral doses of nortriptyline and 20 patients with depression on steady-state oral treatment. METHODS: A total of 275 nortriptyline plasma concentrations were analysed by standard nonlinear regression and nonlinear mixed effect models. The pharmacokinetic model was a 1-compartment model with first order absorption and elimination. All participants had previously been genotyped with respect to the CYP2D6 polymorphism. RESULTS: A model in which the intrinsic clearance is a linear function of the number of functional CYP2D6 genes and hepatic blood flow is fixed to 60 L/h gave the closest fit of the pharmacokinetic model to the data. Stable estimates were obtained for population pharmacokinetic parameters and interindividual variances. Assuming 100% absorption, the model allows systemic clearance and bioavailability to be estimated. Bioavailability was found to vary between 0.17 and 0.71, depending on the genotype. Using the frequency distribution of CYP2D6 genotype with the above results we estimate that, in compliant Swedish individuals on nortriptyline monotherapy, the number of functional CYP2D6 genes could explain 21% of the total interindividual variance in oral clearance of nortriptyline and 34% of that in steady-state plasma concentrations. CONCLUSION: Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling can be used to quantify the influence of the number of functional CYP2D6 genes on the metabolic clearance and plasma concentration of drugs metabolised by this enzyme. Gene dose has a significant impact on drug pharmacokinetics and prior knowledge of it may aid in predicting plasma concentration of the drug and thus tailoring patient-specific dosage regimens.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1998

A post hoc comparison of paroxetine and nortriptyline for symptoms of traumatic grief.

BACKGROUND: This report presents the results of an open-trial pilot study of paroxetine for symptoms of traumatic grief, compared with the effects of nortriptyline in an archival contrast group. METHOD: Data are presented on 15 subjects (4 men, 11 women), ranging in age from 40 to 79 years (mean age = 57 years), who experienced the loss of a spouse (N = 8), child (N =5), grandchild (N = 1), or parent (N = 1). Subjects were required to have a baseline score on the Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG) of > or = 20. Treatment with paroxetine began at a median of 17 months (range, 6-139 months) after the loss. Paroxetine-treated subjects received a psychotherapy tailored for traumatic grief. Depressive symptoms were assessed by using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D). The ICG and the HAM-D were administered weekly over 4 months of paroxetine treatment (median dose = 30 mg/day). The group receiving paroxetine were then compared with a group (N = 22) participating in a separate trial of nortriptyline (median dose = 77.5 mg/day) for treatment of bereavement-related major depressive episodes. RESULTS: Level of traumatic grief symptoms (ICG) decreased by 53%, and depression ratings (HAM-D) decreased by 54% in paroxetine-treated subjects. Nortriptyline showed clinical effects comparable to those of paroxetine. CONCLUSION: Paroxetine may be an effective agent in the treatment of traumatic grief symptoms. A comparison of the paroxetine-treated group with a nortriptyline-treated group suggests that both agents have comparably beneficial effects on the symptoms of traumatic grief (as well as those of depression). However, the higher rate of diagnostic comorbidity in the paroxetine-treated group, together with the greater chronicity of their symptoms and the greater safety of paroxetine in overdose, leads us to favor paroxetine over nortriptyline for traumatic grief symptoms in general psychiatric practice. Further controlled evaluation of paroxetine for traumatic grief is necessary.

Adjustment Disorders↗

PubMed1999

A double-blind randomized comparison of nortriptyline and paroxetine in the treatment of late-life depression: 6-week outcome.

BACKGROUND: Some studies have suggested that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors may be less efficacious than tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of severe depression in older patients. The objective of this study was to compare the 6-week outcome of treatment with nortriptyline and paroxetine in older patients with a major depressive episode. METHOD: A double-blind randomized comparison of nortriptyline and paroxetine was conducted in 80 elderly (mean +/- SD age = 75.0 +/- 7.4 years) psychiatric inpatients and outpatients who presented with a major depressive episode. Dropout and response rates were compared in patients who began or completed treatment. Rates of response of inpatients and patients with melancholic depression were also compared. RESULTS: Over 6 weeks, there were no significant differences in dropout rates due to side effects (nortriptyline, 14% vs. paroxetine, 19%) or for any reason (27% vs. 33%). Similarly, there were no significant differences between the rates of favorable response to nortriptyline or paroxetine (intent-to-treat analysis, 57% vs. 44%; completer analysis, 78% vs. 66%). Analyses restricted to inpatients or to patients with melancholic depression yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: Nortriptyline and paroxetine appear to have similar efficacy and tolerability in the acute (6-week) treatment of older depressed patients, including hospitalized patients and those with melancholic features.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2001

A twelve-week, double-blind, randomized comparison of nortriptyline and paroxetine in older depressed inpatients and outpatients.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors may be less efficacious than tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of severe depression in older patients. The authors compared the 12-week clinical outcome of older depressed patients treated with nortriptyline or paroxetine in a double-blind randomized comparison in 116 psychiatric inpatients and outpatients (mean age: 72+/-8 years) who presented with a major depressive episode or melancholic depression. Discontinuation and response rates were compared in patients who began or who completed treatment. The discontinuation rate due to side effects was significantly higher with nortriptyline than with paroxetine (33% vs. 16%). There were no significant differences between the rates of response in the Intent-to-Treat analysis (nortriptyline: 57% vs. paroxetine: 55% ), or the Completer analysis (nortriptyline: 78% vs. paroxetine: 84%). Although paroxetine appears to be better tolerated than nortriptyline, the efficacy of these two drugs does not appear to differ in the acute treatment of older depressed patients, including hospitalized patients and those with melancholic features.

Aged↗

PubMed1991

Effects of nortriptyline on memory self-assessment and performance in recovered elderly depressives.

The effects of nortriptyline (NTL) on memory were compared with those of placebo (PBO), in elderly subjects after recovery from a major depression. Subjective and objective memory was assessed using a repeated-measures discontinuation design. Average immediate, but not delayed, free recall, on a 20-item selective reminding test was adversely affected by medication. Free recall on placebo was stable over four learning trials and at delay. A different pattern of responses occurred on nortriptyline: Performance dropped off significantly on learning Trial 2, remained worse than placebo through Trial 4, but improved after a 15-min delay. Performance on measures of immediate and delayed recognition memory were comparable on nortriptyline and placebo. Discontinuation of nortriptyline resulted in significant improvement on a subset of nine memory self-assessment items. On questions addressing ability to retrieve recently learned information, subjects reported the greatest improvement while on placebo compared with nortriptyline.

Aged↗

PubMed1991

Comparative efficacy and safety of nortriptyline and fluoxetine in the treatment of major depression: a clinical study.

The safety and efficacy of nortriptyline and fluoxetine were compared in a double-blind, randomized, multicenter 5-week trial involving 205 outpatients with acute major depression of moderate severity. Seventy-two nortriptyline and 84 fluoxetine patients completed at least 2 weeks of medication and were included in the efficacy analysis; all patients were evaluated for side effects. Average total scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) for both treatment groups declined from 22-23 at baseline to 11.5 at the conclusion of the 5-week period. At Week, 5, 71% of nortriptyline patients and 65% of fluoxetine patients were much or very much improved. Fluoxetine was associated more frequently with nausea (p less than .05), while nortriptyline was associated more frequently with dry mouth (p less than .05). These results are discussed in the context of selecting between nortriptyline and fluoxetine for a particular depressed patient.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1985

Child and adolescent nortriptyline single dose kinetics predict steady state plasma levels and suggested dose: preliminary data.

The use of nortriptyline single dose kinetics to predict steady state plasma levels and suggested dose was investigated in 33 pediatric subjects who were diagnosed as having major depressive disorder. The data were analyzed separately for the 11 subjects 5 to 9 years old who received a single dose of 25 mg and a fixed daily dose of 20 mg of nortriptyline, and for the 22 subjects 10 to 16 years old who received a single dose of 50 mg and a fixed daily dose of 50 mg of nortriptyline (N = 17) or a fixed daily dose of 20 mg (N = 5) because of a very slow rate of metabolism of the drug. Correlations within the group of 5 to 9 years olds between the steady state plasma levels and the five sampling points after the single dose were all highly significant. Correlations between the steady state plasma levels within the group of 10 to 16 year olds and the five sampling points after the single dose and a fixed daily dose of 50 mg (N = 17) were also highly significant. Similar correlations for the total group of 10 to 16 year olds (N = 22) were performed (prorating the steady state plasma levels of the slow metabolizers), and these too were highly significant. Suggested dose schedules for each age group were developed from the regression equations of nortriptyline steady state plasma levels versus 24-hour nortriptyline plasma levels after the single dose. The regression equation for the group of 5 to 9 year olds was highly significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗

PubMed1979

Novel 125I-labeled nortriptyline derivatives and their use in liquid-phase or magnetizable solid-phase second-antibody radioimmunoassays.

Nortriptyline derivatives prepared by reaction with fluorescein isothiocyanate or conjugation to N-acetyl-L-histidine were radioiodinated and the products purified with Sephadex LH-20 columns to obtain two novel nortriptyline radioligands. Antisera were raised in rabbits by immunization with nortriptyline conjugated to succinylated ovine albumin. By use of the iodinated fluorescein derivative we developed a liquid-phase second-antibody radioimmunoassay that gives results correlating closely (r = 0.98) with those by an established radioimmunoassay of similar specificity in the assay of apparent total amitriptyline and its metabolite nortriptyline in serum or plasma from patients being treated with these drugs. With the iodinated N-acetyl-L-histidine derivative we developed a magnetizable solid-phase second-antibody radioimmunoassay. The cross reactivities of amitriptyline and nortriptyline could be made equal by performing the assay at pH 9.0, which makes it possible to measure true total active drug concentrations in patients receiving amitriptyline.

Amitriptyline↗

PubMed1979

Gas chromatographic determination of amitriptyline, nortriptyline and perphenazine in plasma of schizophrenic patients after administration of the combination of amitriptyline with perphenazine.

A specific and sensitive gas-chromatographic technique using a common extraction procedure for the quantitative determination of amitriptyline, endogenous nortriptyline and perphenazine in plasma of schizophrenic patients receiving therapeutic doses of a combination of amitriptyline and perphenazine (Etrafon) has been developed. The lower limits of detection are 20 ng/ml for amitriptyline, 1 ng/ml for nortriptyline and 5 ng/ml for perphenazine. Amitriptyline is estimated with a flame ionization detector. Nortriptyline is quantitated using an electron capture detector after converting it to its heptafluorobutyryl derivative by reaction with the appropriate anhydride. Perphenazine is also determined using an electron capture detector after forming its stable, trimethylsilyl derivative by reaction with N,O-bis-(trimethylsilyl)-acetamide. In individual patients, the steady-state plasma levels ranged from 44 to 215 ng/ml for amitriptyline, from 49 to 270 ng/ml for nortriptyline and from less than 5 to 20 ng/ml for perphenazine. Steady-state plasma levels data on amitriptyline, nortriptyline and perphenazine in 23 patients treated with Etrafon are presented.

Adult↗