SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Nephrectomy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

PubMed1996

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal tumor: the Washington University experience.

PURPOSE: We report our experience with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 17 consecutive patients with renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical data on 17 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy were reviewed. Of the patients 12 with stage pT1 or pT2 renal cell carcinoma 7 cm. in diameter or smaller undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy were compared to 12 undergoing open radical nephrectomy for stage pT1 or pT2 renal cell carcinoma 6 cm. in diameter or smaller. RESULTS: Among the 17 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy average operative time was 6.9 hours (range 4.5 to 9) and average estimated blood loss was 105 cc (range 50 to 600). Average weight of the surgical specimen was 402 gm. (range 190 to 1,100). In 12 of 16 patients in whom laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was completed the specimen was removed intact. The patients required an average of 24 mg. morphine sulfate equivalent (range 2 to 220) for postoperative pain. Average hospital stay was 4.5 days (range 3 to 11) and average interval to resume normal activities was 3.5 weeks (range 2 to 4). The 12 patients in the open and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy groups were similar with respect to age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score and interval surgery. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy required significantly more operative time than open radical nephrectomy (6.9 versus 2.2 hours, respectively). However, the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy group compared to the open radical nephrectomy group had significantly less postoperative pain (24 versus 40 mg. morphine sulfate equivalent required for postoperative analgesia), shorter interval to resuming oral intake (1 versus 3 days), more rapid discharge from the hospital (4.5 versus 8.4 days) and more rapid return to normal activities (3.5 versus 5.1 weeks). The laparoscopic nephrectomy group also fully recovered more rapidly than the open surgical group (5.8 versus 39 weeks). To date, during a 4-year period there was no retroperitoneal recurrence or seeding of port site. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is a lengthy and demanding procedure. However, it affords patients with renal cell carcinoma a markedly improved postoperative course while accomplishing the necessary surgical goals.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

The role of nephrectomy in the acutely injured.

HYPOTHESIS: The high mortality in patients who undergo nephrectomy after trauma is not secondary to the nephrectomy itself but is the consequence of a more severe constellation of injuries associated with renal injuries that require operative intervention. DESIGN: A retrospective review of all patients identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes as having sustained renal injuries over a 62-month period. PATIENTS: Seventy-eight patients with renal injuries who underwent exploratory laparotomy were identified. METHODS: All medical records were reviewed for patient management, definitive care, and outcome. Based on outcome, patients were assigned to either the survivor or nonsurvivor group. For patients who underwent nephrectomy, intraoperative core temperature changes, estimated blood loss, and operative time were also reviewed. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients with renal injuries who underwent exploratory laparotomy were identified. Twenty-nine patients underwent laparotomy with conservative management of the renal injury, of whom 5 (17.2%) died. Twelve patients had renal injuries repaired and all survived. Thirty-seven patients underwent nephrectomy, of whom 16 (43.2%) died. Compared with nephrectomy survivors, nephrectomy nonsurvivors had a significantly lower initial systolic blood pressure, higher Injury Severity Score, higher incidence of extra-abdominal injuries, shorter operative duration, and higher estimated operative blood loss. The nephrectomy survivors' core temperature increased a mean of 0.5 degrees C in the operating room, while the nephrectomy nonsurvivors' core temperature cooled a mean of 0.8 degrees C. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo trauma nephrectomy tend to be severely injured and hemodynamically unstable and warrant nephrectomy as part of the damage control paradigm. That a high percentage of patients die after nephrectomy for trauma demonstrates the severity of the overall constellation of injury and is not a consequence of the nephrectomy itself.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2003

[Laparoscopic vs. open nephrectomy. 10 years' results of a nonrandomized comparative study of 549 patients with benign kidney diseases].

We report the results from a nonrandomized comparison of open flank vs laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with benign renal disease. Between 1993 and 2002, 549 nephrectomies for benign renal disease were performed at the Department of Urology of the Medical University of Lübeck and the Urological Department of the Martin Luther University in Halle/Wittenberg. There were 236 patients in the open flank nephrectomy group and 313 patients in the laparoscopic nephrectomy group. Clinical parameters were compared among both groups. Median operative time in the open flank nephrectomy group was 90 min (range: 30-240 min) and also 90 min in the laparoscopic nephrectomy group (range: 41-210 min). There were 54 complications (17.2%) in the laparoscopic nephrectomy group compared to 60 complications (25.4%) in the open flank nephrectomy group. Patients in the laparoscopy group demonstrated clear advantages in terms of analgesic use for pain control, hospital stay, and convalescence. Laparoscopic nephrectomy results in a significantly briefer postoperative course when compared to open flank nephrectomy. However, due to a limited number of patients, a laparoscopic nephrectomy is mainly reserved for laparoscopic centers. Nevertheless, the laparoscopic approach should be offered to the majority of patients with benign renal disease requiring nephrectomy.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Cumulative incidence, indications, morbidity and mortality of transplant nephrectomy and the most appropriate time for graft removal: only nonfunctioning transplants that cause intractable complications should be excised.

PURPOSE: We assessed the cumulative incidence of transplant nephrectomy in our population of patients who underwent transplantation and those in whom the transplant failed due to immunological causes. Transplant nephrectomy indications, morbidity and mortality were analyzed to establish the most appropriate time for graft removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included all patients who underwent transplantation and graft removal at our institution from January 1, 1970 through January 1, 2000. We estimated the noncumulative incidence of transplant nephrectomy, morbidity and mortality. The cumulative incidence of transplant nephrectomy was estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Of the 631 renal transplants performed in 598 patients we studied a total of 91 transplant nephrectomies in 85 patients. The cumulative incidence of transplant nephrectomy 15 years after the date of transplantation was 25% (95% CI 14 to 40). The cumulative incidence of transplant nephrectomy at 10 years after the date of return to dialysis was 74% (95% CI 49 to 90). The main indication for transplant nephrectomy was graft related complications associated with chronic rejection in 58.2% of cases. The morbidity rate was 48.3% (95% CI 37.7 to 59). Hemorrhagic events were the chief complication. In 7 patients there was a total of 10 reoperations (10.9%, 95% CI 5.3 to 19.2). The mortality rate was 7% (95% CI 2.6 to 14.7). These patients died of sepsis. Urgent transplant nephrectomies had statistically higher morbidity and mortality (p <0.01 and 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Most transplant nephrectomies were performed within 2 years of the transplant date and almost half were done within year 1 after the return to dialysis. The advent of cyclosporine significantly decreased the transplant nephrectomy rate at the expense of fewer graft failures but not at the expense of a lower amount of graft related symptoms after patients returned to dialysis. Bleeding was the leading cause of morbidity and infection was the main cause of mortality. Considering the high morbidity and mortality of transplant nephrectomy, and the potential benefits of leaving nonfunctioning grafts in situ our current policy is to remove the graft only in cases of failed transplants that cause intractable complications.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Nephrectomy: changing indications, 1960-1990.

OBJECTIVE: To review the indications for nephrectomy over the period 1960-1990. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1470 nephrectomies were performed (excluding transplant-related nephrectomies) over this period. Data were collected by means of a pathology report review and the indications were classified according to aetiology. RESULTS: The total number of nephrectomies performed has not significantly changed over this 31-year period. There was a significant decrease in the number of partial nephrectomies performed and an increase in the number of nephrectomies performed for tumour. This change was equally distributed between both renal adenocarcinomas and transitional cell tumours. The number of nephrectomies for chronic pyelonephritis decreased over this period. The change seen was not as great as might have been anticipated in view of the advent of modern antibiotics. Nephrectomies performed for tuberculosis decreased, although this change was not established until the 1980s. In the 1960s and early 1970s, most tuberculous nephrectomies were performed in patients from the native community. By the 1980s, most patients in this category were from the ethnic Asian immigrant community. Nephrectomy rates for polycystic kidney and trauma remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Despite changes in the investigation and management of renal tract pathologies, which contributed to a change in the indications for nephrectomy, the overall number of nephrectomies performed has remained constant over a 31-year period.

Humans↗

PubMed2000

Comparison of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy with open surgery for tuberculous nonfunctioning kidneys.

PURPOSE: We describe, define and evaluate the role of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for tuberculous nonfunctioning kidneys, and compare the results with those of open nephrectomy in similar cases in a nonrandomized study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Beginning in July 1994, 9 patients underwent retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for tuberculous nonfunctioning kidneys at our center. Data obtained from the records of these patients were compared with those of 9 who underwent open nephrectomy for a similar indication during the same period. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy was initially performed by kidney dissection followed by ligation of the hilar vessels. The technique was subsequently modified and the vessels controlled before dissecting the kidney. Various parameters were compared and statistical analysis was done. RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar in regard to patient age, gender and side of disease. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy was successful in 7 of the 9 patients. Although 2 of our initial patients required conversion to open surgery, the remaining 7 successfully underwent retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy after modifying the technique. Mean operative time was slightly greater in the retroperitoneoscopy than in the open surgery group (103.3 versus 92.2 minutes). Mean blood loss was less in the retroperitoneoscopy group (101.4 versus 123.3 ml.), mean hospital stay plus or minus standard deviation was significantly shorter (3.2 +/- 0.83 versus 8.88 +/- 3.37 days) and mean time to return to work was significantly less (3 versus 7 weeks). Mean analgesic requirement for opioids and diclofenac sodium was also lower in the retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy group (0 versus 1.44 +/- 0.72 and 3.8 +/- 1.3 versus 4.3 +/- 1.2 doses, respectively). Minor complications developed in only 2 retroperitoneoscopy cases. CONCLUSIONS: Tuberculosis has been considered a contraindication to retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy due to a high conversion rate. However, we believe that our modified technique of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy is a viable option for managing tuberculous nonfunctioning kidneys. The conversion rate is lower than previously reported. Comparing our results with those of open nephrectomy shows that retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy is beneficial in all respects except for slightly longer operative time. Because of the benefits of minimally invasive surgery, this approach should be considered in such cases.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

Unilateral nephrectomy in dogs with renal disease: 30 cases (1985-1994).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate indications for and complications, efficacy, and effects on renal function of unilateral nephrectomy in dogs with renal disease, and to evaluate the role that scintigraphy had in the decision to excise a kidney. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. ANIMALS: 30 dogs with renal disease that underwent unilateral nephrectomy. A comparison group of 12 dogs with renal calculi that underwent renal scintigraphy but not nephrectomy was included. RESULTS: Indications for nephrectomy included renal or ureteral calculi (n = 10), renal mass (8), chronic pyelonephritis (5), perirenal mass (3), severe hydronephrosis and hydroureter (3), and renal hypoplasia with ureteral ectopia (1). None of the dogs were azotemic before surgery. Renal scintigraphy apparently influenced the decision to perform nephrectomy, because in 14 of 16 dogs that underwent nephrectomy, the affected kidney contributed < or = 33% of the total glomerular filtration rate, but in 6 of 8 comparison dogs that underwent nephrotomy, the affected kidney contributed > 33% of total glomerular filtration rate. Complications of nephrectomy included oliguria (5) and organ laceration (2). Mean +/- SD final serum creatinine concentration for 16 dogs alive at least 6 months after nephrectomy was 2.2 +/- 1.8 mg/dl. Three dogs had chronic renal failure of undetermined cause at the time of death. Nephrectomy did not completely resolve the underlying disease in 13 dogs. Renal function was evaluated in 6 dogs 2 to 3.5 years after nephrectomy and was impaired in 4. None of the dogs were anemic, azotemic, proteinuric, or hypertensive. Survival time varied depending on the underlying disease. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Multiple factors contributed to the decision to perform nephrectomy. Unilateral nephrectomy resulted in few serious complications and was not detrimental to the remaining kidney, but did not always resolve the underlying disease.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Surgical complications of graft nephrectomy in the modern transplant era.

PURPOSE: Transplant nephrectomy has been considered a hazardous procedure throughout transplantation history. Better surgical techniques and clinical treatment of patients have improved the results of this surgery in the last decades. We report the surgical complications of nephrectomy of early and late failed kidneys performed at a referral center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The charts of 70 consecutive patients who underwent graft nephrectomy between May 1994 and April 2002 were reviewed regarding surgical complications. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the timing of graft removal. Early nephrectomy group 1 included 23 procedures performed in the first 60 days after transplantation and late nephrectomy group 2 included 47 performed after that interval. Groups were compared concerning outcome, blood loss and amount of blood transfused in the perioperative period, and the incidence of surgical complications according to the surgical technique, immunosuppressive regimen and timing of surgery. RESULTS: Mean blood loss was 434 ml (range 20 to 3,000) in group 1 and 546 (range 60 to 2,200) in group 2 (p = 0.02). Nine group 1 patients (39.1%) and 22 in group 2 (46.8%) received blood transfusion in the perioperative period (p = 0.62). The mean amount of blood transfused was 516.7 ml in group 1 and 436.3 ml in group 2 (p = 0.36). Four and 2 minor surgical complications occurred in groups 1 and 2 (17.4% and 4.3%, respectively, p = 0.09). Seven major complications were noted in group 2 (14.9%), while there were none in group 1 (p = 0.05). Three complications (25%) occurred in patients who received antirejection globulins or methylprednisolone and 1 (9.1%) developed when these agents were not administered (p = 0.33). The incidence of surgical complications after intracapsular and extracapsular nephrectomy was 20% and 17.6%, respectively (p = 0.58). Mean blood loss and the mean amount of blood transfused was 638 and 525 ml for intracapsular nephrectomy and 383 and 350 ml for extracapsular nephrectomy, respectively, respectively. Surgical complications occurred in 3 patients who received mycophenolate mofetil (23.1%) and in 6 (17.6%) who did not received this drug (p = 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Blood loss and surgical complication rates were higher in late failed graft nephrectomies. Surgical complications in intracapsular vs extracapsular nephrectomies were similar but blood loss and transfusions were higher for intracapsular nephrectomy. Acute rejection treatment, or prophylaxis with methylprednisolone or globulins increased the incidence of surgical complications.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy: the Mayo clinic experience.

PURPOSE: We present the incidence of complications and conversions during laparoscopic nephrectomy performed for various indications and discuss methods to help prevent future complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 1999 to February 2003 at our institution 285 laparoscopic nephrectomy cases were performed, consisting of 113 radical nephrectomies, 101 donor nephrectomies, 27 simple nephrectomies, 23 partial nephrectomies and 21 nephroureterectomies. We reviewed the data base of patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy to examine complications and analyze factors related to conversion to an open surgical procedure. RESULTS: Major complications occurred in 16 patients (5.6%). Major complications were surgical in 12 patients and medical in 4. Of the major surgical complications 3, 6, 1, 1 and 1 occurred during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, donor nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy, simple nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy, respectively. The predominant major surgical complication was bleeding requiring conversion to an open surgical procedure. The overall conversion rate was 4% (12 patients), consisting of 6 emergency and 6 elective conversions. The remaining 27 patients experienced minor surgical or postoperative medical problems, such as urinary retention or wound infection. The mortality rate in our series was 0%. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic renal surgery is becoming a routine procedure in the armamentarium of many urologists. Complications that are unique to laparoscopy exist but they should decrease with time with repetition and experience. We have learned many different precautions and procedures that should help decrease the risk of future complications associated with laparoscopic renal surgery.

Female↗

PubMed2006

Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the best approach for live donor nephrectomy to minimise discomfort to the donor and to provide good graft function. DESIGN: Single blind, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Two university medical centres, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 100 living kidney donors. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly assigned to either laparoscopic donor nephrectomy or to mini incision muscle splitting open donor nephrectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was physical fatigue using the multidimensional fatigue inventory 20 (MFI-20). Secondary outcomes were physical function using the SF-36, hospital stay after surgery, pain, operating times, recipient graft function, and graft survival. RESULTS: Conversions did not occur. Compared with mini incision open donor nephrectomy, laparoscopic donor nephrectomy resulted in longer skin to skin time (median 221 v 164 minutes, P < 0.001), longer warm ischaemia time (6 v 3 minutes, P < 0.001), less blood loss (100 v 240 ml, P < 0.001), and a similar number of complications (intraoperatively 12% v 6%, P = 0.49, postoperatively both 6%). After laparoscopic nephrectomy, donors required less morphine (16 v 25 mg, P = 0.005) and shorter hospital stay (3 v 4 days, P = 0.003). During one year's follow-up mean physical fatigue was less (difference - 1.3, 95% confidence interval - 2.4 to - 0.1) and physical function was better (difference 6.2, 2.0 to 10.3) after laparoscopic nephrectomy. Function of the graft and graft survival rate of the recipient at one year censored for death did not differ (100% after laparoscopic nephrectomy and 98% after open nephrectomy). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy results in a better quality of life compared with mini incision open donor nephrectomy but equal safety and graft function.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Laparoscopic bilateral hand assisted nephrectomy for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: initial experience.

PURPOSE: The laparoscopic technique for bilateral nephrectomy in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease is technically difficult. The procedure may be more acceptable if alterations to the technique made it safer and easier to perform. We describe our initial experience with, and the feasibility and potential benefits of hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for approaching these large kidneys in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This approach was successfully applied in 3 patients with end stage renal disease due to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. After obtaining transumbilical pneumoperitoneum ports were placed in the umbilicus (12 mm.), sub-xiphoid in the midline (12 mm.) and subcostal in the midclavicular line on each side (12 mm.). The table was tilted 40 degrees away from the planned side of initial nephrectomy with the patient in the half lateral position. A 7 cm. midline incision was made that incorporated the umbilical port and a commercially available hand assistance device was positioned. One surgeon hand was inserted into the abdomen to serve as a retractor/blunt dissector, while the other operated the electrosurgical instruments. The right hand was inserted for left nephrectomy and the left hand was inserted for right nephrectomy. The laparoscope was passed via the sub-xiphoid port and the instruments were placed through the ipsilateral subcostal laparoscopic port. Nephrectomy was completed and the specimen was removed through the hand port incision by draining the cysts as they were exposed to view via the midline incision. When dissection was difficult, an additional port was placed in the anterior axillary line at the umbilical level. Some cysts were ruptured or aspirated to decrease overall kidney size and make extraction possible via the 6 to 7 cm. midline incision. RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed. Mean operative time for bilateral hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy was 5.5 hours (range 4.5 to 6.6). Estimated blood loss was 200 cc or less. Patients resumed oral intake on postoperative day 1. The mean amount of parenteral analgesics required postoperatively was decreased. Mean hospital stay was 4.3 days but it was 3 days when considering nephrectomy only. Patients returned to normal activity after an average of 2 weeks. There was sustained resolution of preoperative discomfort based on pain analog scales. At 1 month or less all patients recorded absent pain. They uniformly noticed improved preoperative pulmonary and gastrointestinal symptoms CONCLUSIONS: Hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease makes bilateral nephrectomy a reasonable option. The bilateral procedure may be performed as rapidly as laparoscopic only, unilateral nephrectomy in these cases. The advantages of the hand assisted approach include using tactile sensation to facilitate dissection, rapid blunt finger dissection, hand retraction and the application of immediate tamponade when needed. This procedure provides the benefits of minimal intraoperative blood loss, minimal postoperative pain, brief hospital stay and rapid convalescence in this group of patients at high risk.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Determinants of late allograft nephrectomy.

When loss of graft function occurs more than six months after transplantation, allograft nephrectomy is not routinely performed at the time of graft failure. It is usually performed only on those patients who subsequently develop specific complications. However, little is known about the characteristics that make patients more likely to require allograft nephrectomy. The purpose of our study was to identify risk factors for the subsequent need for allograft nephrectomy in patients with graft failure occurring more than 6 months after transplantation. Forty-one patients were studied. Inclusion criteria were: loss of graft function > or = 6 months after transplantation, resumption of dialysis and initiation of weaning from immunosuppression. Thirty patients were treated with cyclosporine + prednisone +/- azathioprine and 11 with azathioprine + prednisone. Mean follow-up time was 17.8 months, ranging from 6 months to 6.1 years. Recipient age, sex and race, original renal disease, donor, donor source (cadaveric vs living related), HLA compatibility, levels of panel reactive antibodies, occurrence of initial delayed graft function, causes of graft failure and tapering of immunosuppression were similar in patients with and without allograft nephrectomy. Using univariate analysis, allograft nephrectomy was found to be significantly more frequent in patients with a history of 2 or more episodes of acute rejection than in patients with no rejection episode: 83% vs 30% (p = 0.03). In addition, allograft nephrectomy was found to be significantly more frequent if the immunosuppressive regimen included cyclosporine (62% vs 27.3%; p = 0.04). Using multivariate analysis however, the number of previous episodes of rejection was found to be the only significant predictor for allograft nephrectomy. None of the other variables considered in the multivariate analysis, including the type of immunosuppressive therapy, was identified as a significant predictor for the need to perform allograft nephrectomy. In summary, the need for late allograft nephrectomy was correlated with the number of previous episodes of acute rejection. Patients with a history of numerous rejection episodes should thus be considered more likely to require allograft nephrectomy once immunosuppression is withdrawn. Possible interventions to reduce or prevent the need for nephrectomy include more gradual tapering of immunosuppression at the time of graft failure or indefinite low-dose immunosuppressive therapy.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Laparoscopic total and partial nephrectomy.

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has established its role as a standard of care for the management of renal neoplasms. Long term follow-up has demonstrated laparoscopic radical nephrectomy has shorter patient hospitalization and effective cancer control, with no significant difference in survival compared with open radical nephrectomy. For renal masses less than 4cm, partial nephrectomy is indicated for patients with a solitary kidney or who demonstrate impairment of contralateral renal function. The major technical issue for success of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is bleeding control and several techniques have been developed to achieve better hemostatic control. Development of new laparoscopic techniques for partial nephrectomy can be divided into 2 categories: hilar control and warm ischemia vs. no hilar control. Development of a laparoscopic Satinsky clamp has achieved en bloc control of the renal hilum in order to allow cold knife excision of the mass, with laparoscopic repair of the collecting system, if needed. Combination of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with ablative techniques has achieved successful excision of renal masses with adequate hemostasis without hilar clamping. Other techniques without hilar control have been investigated and included the use of a microwave tissue coagulator. In conclusion, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma has clearly demonstrated low morbidity and equivalent cancer control. The rates for local recurrences and metastatic spread are low and actuarial survival high. Furthermore, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has demonstrated to be technically feasible, with low morbidity. With short term outcomes demonstrating laparoscopic partial nephrectomy as an efficacious procedure, the role of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy should continue to increase.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1992

Acceleration of late radiation damage of the kidney by unilateral nephrectomy.

Both increased proliferation as measured by labeling index and the appearance of abnormally large nuclei in renal proximal tubule cells, which have been observed in mouse kidneys after irradiation, were enhanced by subsequent unilateral nephrectomy. Nephrectomy alone induced only a transient increase in labeling index, lasting less than 1 month, whereas nephrectomy after irradiation induced an increase above that of the irradiated kidneys without nephrectomy lasting as long as 9 months. The incidence of large nuclei in kidneys from mice unilaterally nephrectomized 1 week after irradiation showed a rapid increase with time, peaking at 4.6% at 6 months, compared to more gradual increases with peaks at about 4.0% at 9 or 12 months in irradiated kidneys without nephrectomy or those in which nephrectomy was done prior to irradiation. This result demonstrates that nephrectomy after irradiation accelerates the appearance of this indicator of radiation damage, rather than enhancing the maximum amount of damage. Unilateral nephrectomy after irradiation also increased kidney damage 9 months later, as indicated by kidney weight loss and increased blood urea nitrogen. These results are consistent with our model for radiation damage of the kidney in which radiation induces cell proliferation and the appearance of reproductively dead, large nuclear cells that are lost at subsequent attempts to divide; the acceleration of radiation damage by unilateral nephrectomy performed after radiation could very well be a result of nephrectomy-induced enhancement in the proliferation of proximal tubule cells.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Use of nephrectomy at select medical centers--a case of follow the crowd?

PURPOSE: Regionalization of high risk surgical procedures to larger, teaching hospitals has been suggested as a means to improve the quality of care. We determined the extent to which the regionalization of nephrectomy has occurred and describe the potential causes and implications of any observed regionalization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample comprises a 20% sampling of hospital discharges in the United States yearly. Patients undergoing nephrectomy for kidney cancer between 1988 and 2002 were identified using International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Regionalization was assessed using 6 structural hospital measures, including teaching status, urban location, discharge volume, nephrectomy volume, bed capacity and for-profit status. Adjusted models were developed to identify the significance of temporal trends in each regionalization measure. RESULTS: We identified 66,621 patients undergoing nephrectomy during the study period. Compared to procedures performed between 1988 and 1990 the likelihood of undergoing nephrectomy at teaching, high nephrectomy volume and high throughput (all diagnoses) hospitals increased by 2.0 (CI 1.9 to 2.2), 7.4 (CI 7.1 to 7.7) and 2.2 times (CI 2.1 to 2.2), respectively, in 2000 to 2002. Conversely nephrectomy was less likely to be performed at for-profit hospitals (OR 0.5, CI 0.5 to 0.6). Patients were more likely to undergo partial nephrectomy at teaching, high volume, high throughput, urban hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Regionalization of nephrectomy to teaching and high volume (nephrectomy and all diagnoses) hospitals is currently under way. Although the implications are not entirely clear, this study provides further evidence for the crowding of complex surgical procedures into these institutions.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Major complications in 213 laparoscopic nephrectomy cases: the Indianapolis experience.

PURPOSE: We assessed the incidence of and analyzed factors that may help prevent major complications and open conversion during laparoscopic nephrectomy at our institutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all laparoscopic nephrectomies performed between August 1, 1999 and July 31, 2001. Data were stratified for nephrectomy type, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Conversion to open surgery was stratified for emergency versus elective procedures. RESULTS: Of the 292 laparoscopic procedures performed at our institutions in 2 years 213 (73%) involved laparoscopic nephrectomy, including 84 live donor nephrectomies, 61 radical nephrectomies, 55 simple nephrectomies and 13 nephroureterectomies. A total of 16 major complications (7.5%) occurred, including access related, intraoperative and postoperative complications in 3, 9 and 4 cases, respectively. The conversion rate was 6.1% (13 patients), the transfusion rate was 1.9% and the mortality rate was 0.5% (1 death). Only 1 complication was related to simple laparoscopic nephrectomy, although this group showed the highest rate of elective conversion (7 of 8 elective conversions). Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy showed the highest rate for emergency conversion (3 of 5 emergency conversions). CONCLUSIONS: Our results reinforce the importance of thorough preoperative imaging, careful patient selection, surgeon experience and skill maintenance in laparoscopy as well as a low threshold for conversion to open surgery. This series provides additional evidence to support the evolution of laparoscopic nephrectomy into a standard of care.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a five-year experience.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for patients with small renal cell carcinoma by comparing the clinical results of patients treated laparoscopically with those of patients treated with traditional open radical nephrectomy. METHODS: Of 100 patients with localized, small (less than 5 cm in diameter) renal cell carcinoma treated by the same surgical team between 1992 and 1998, 60 patients underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and 40 underwent open radical nephrectomy. Of the 60 laparoscopically treated patients, the first 11 and the most recent 34 patients were operated on transperitoneally and the other 15 retroperitoneally. RESULTS: The mean operative time of the laparoscopically treated patients was longer than that of the open nephrectomy patients (5.2 versus 3.3 hours, P<0.001). The mean blood loss of the laparoscopically treated patients was less than that of the open nephrectomy patients (255 versus 512 mL, P<0.001). One laparoscopically treated patient needed conversion to open surgery. The time to full convalescence of the laparoscopically treated patients was shorter than that of the open nephrectomy patients (23 versus 57 days, P<0.001). Two of the 59 laparoscopically treated patients and 1 of the 40 open nephrectomy patients had metastatic disease. The former 2 are alive with stable disease and the latter died of progressive disease 11 months after surgery. The 5-year disease-free rate was 95.5% in laparoscopy patients and 97.5% in open nephrectomy patients (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is a less invasive alternative to open surgery for patients with localized small renal cell carcinoma.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy as preparation for administration of systemic interleukin-2 in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Cytoreductive nephrectomy is commonly performed in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma before systemic interleukin-2 (IL-2) therapy. Open nephrectomy is associated with prolonged recovery during which metastatic disease can progress. The feasibility of laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery in these patients with large renal tumors was examined. The role of tumor morcellation in reducing the recovery period and allowing earlier treatment with IL-2 was investigated. METHODS: Patients with metastatic renal cancer underwent either open nephrectomy (group 1, n = 19) or laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy (n = 11; 6 with tumor morcellation [group 2], 5 with removal of the tumor through a small incision [group 3]). The three groups were compared to evaluate relative recovery, suitability for treatment with IL-2, and laparoscopic port site seeding. RESULTS: A group of 19 patients underwent open nephrectomy (group 1). Eleven patients with a median tumor volume of 377 cm3 (median tumor diameter 9 cm) underwent laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy. Six of these patients underwent tumor morcellation (group 2) and 5 underwent laparoscopic assisted nephrectomy (group 3). There was no difference in patient age, sex, sites of metastatic disease, ECOG status, size of renal tumor, or surgical complication rates among groups. Patients whose tumor was morcellated had reduced postoperative parenteral narcotic requirements and were discharged sooner than patients undergoing open cytoreductive nephrectomy. Time to treatment with IL-2 was shortest in the morcellation group (median time to treatment 37 days). No port site seeding was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with bulky renal disease is a safe procedure in selected patients. This pilot study demonstrated a significant association of laparoscopic tumor morcellation with less postoperative pain, faster time to discharge, and shorter time to treatment with IL-2. A randomized study is warranted to determine the role of laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy with tumor morcellation.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗