PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Reoperation”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

[Reoperation of medullary thyroid carcinoma: long-term results].

STUDY AIM: The impact of iterative surgery in medullary thyroid carcinoma is still debated. The study aim was to evaluate long-term results following reoperation for residual or recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Among the 136 patients operated on in our centre for medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) between 1970 and 2000, 25 patients (10 men and 15 women) were reoperated on for locoregional residual or recurrent lesions. Their mean age was 46 years (range: 19-73 years). The MTC was sporadic in 21 patients and familial in 4: NEM 2A (n = 3), NEM 2B (n = 1). In 11 patients (44%) operated in another centre, the first procedure was a total thyroidectomy; in 2 patients (8%) a total thyroidectomy with central lymphadenectomy was performed, and in 12 patients (48%) a total thyroidectomy with central and jugulo-carotid lymphadenectomy. After the first operation, 6 patients (24%) were classified stage II, 15 (60%) stage III and 4 (16%) stage IV. Basal and post-stimulation calcitonin dosages were performed for all the patients before and after reoperation. RESULTS: Thirty three reoperations were performed. In 24 cases, the recurrence was located in the laterocervical site; in 5 cases, the lymph node involvement was both central and laterocervical, in 2 cases, there was a mediastinal involvement and in 2 cases a spinal involvement. After reoperation, the calcitonin rate became normal in 4 patients (16%); in the other 21 (84%), the calcitonin rate was still high. With a mean 110 month--follow-up (range: 320-12 months), 4 patients (16%) were alive without disease, 2 (8%) died of their disease, 19 (76%) were alive with their disease, five of them with hypercalcitonemia without detectable metastasis. In addition to patients having metastasis at the time of reoperation, seven developed metastases secondarily (liver, bone, lung). CONCLUSION: Biological cure of medullary thyroid carcinoma is rarely obtained with reoperation. Reoperations may reduce progression of the disease in selected patients. Complete removal of the lesions at the time of the first procedure must be the ideal treatment for medullary thyroid carcinoma.

Adult↗

Reoperations on the aortic root and ascending aorta.

BACKGROUND: Reoperations on the aortic root and the ascending aorta are being performed with increasing frequency and remain a challenging problem. METHODS: Eighty-one patients (age range, 14 to 78 years) underwent reoperations on the aortic root or the ascending aorta during a 14.5-year interval ending October 1996. The previous operations were aortic valve procedure (28%), coronary artery bypass grafting (25%), aortic root replacement (24%), ascending aortic replacement (19%), and miscellaneous (5%). Twenty-two patients (27%) had had two or more previous operations. The principal indications for reoperation were true or false aneurysm (35%), acute or chronic dissection (28%), and malfunction of an aortic valve substitute (27%). The reoperations performed were aortic root replacement (composite graft, allograft, or autograft) in 48 patients and graft replacement of the ascending aorta in 33 patients. Concomitant procedures included aortic arch replacement in 43 patients (55%) and coronary artery bypass grafting in 33 patients (41%). RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was 8.6% (7 patients). It was 8.3% for aortic root replacement and 9.1% for ascending aorta replacement (p > 0.05). Using stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis of 23 variables, preoperative functional class III/IV (p = 0.047) and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (p = 0.007) were significant independent predictors of early death. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.6 years. The 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival rates were 89%, 81%, and 69%, respectively. Freedom from reoperation on the heart or ascending aorta was 98%, 92%, and 69%, respectively. Reoperation for false aneurysm (p = 0.050) and the presence of coexisting coronary artery disease requiring bypass grafting (p = 0.010) were the only significant predictors of late mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperations on the aortic root and the ascending aorta can be accomplished with acceptable early mortality and satisfactory long-term results. More frequent resection of the aneurysmal or dissected segments of the ascending aorta and aortic root at the initial operation may reduce the need for subsequent reoperation.

Actuarial Analysis↗

Reoperation on stentless aortic xenografts.

BACKGROUND: Stentless xenografts have been proposed as substitutes for the diseased aortic valve. Cases of valve failure requiring reoperation have thus far been sporadic. To establish the prevalence and outcome of reoperation on stentless aortic xenograft valves, all patients operated on between October 1992 and October 1996 were reviewed. METHODS: One hundred ninety-nine patients, 94 men and 105 women aged 70+/-7 years, had stentless aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis (in 139), insufficiency (19), or both (38). Three prostheses were used, including the Biocor PSB (Belo Horizonte, Brazil) (106), Toronto SPV (St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, MN) (52), and O'Brien-Angell (Cryolife, Atlanta, GA) (41). While the Biocor PSB and Toronto SPV prostheses are designed to be implanted freehand with inflow and outflow suture lines, the O'Brien-Angell valve requires a single suture line. RESULTS: There were 7 (3.5%) total and 6 (3%) valve-related reoperative procedures during a follow-up extending up to 4 years (mean 26+/-20 months). All but one valve-related reoperation, due to endocarditis 36 months after implant, were early (less than 12 months after initial operation). Prevalence of valve-related reinterventions was 1%, 0%, and 12%, and freedom from reoperation at 3 years was 98%+/-2%, 100%, and 81%+/-8%, in patients receiving the Biocor PSB, Toronto SPV, and O'Brien-Angell valves, respectively (p = 0.0039). Cause of reoperation was technical in 3 (O'Brien-Angell), pannus in-growth in 1 (O'Brien-Angell), valve tear in 1 (O'Brien-Angell), and endocarditis in 1 (Biocor PSB). All patients survived replacement of the xenograft with a stented bioprosthesis (5) or homograft root (1) and were discharged after a mean hospital stay of 6+/-3 days (range, 4 to 12 days). At follow-up 15+/-8 months after reintervention (range, 6 to 34 months), all patients are symptom-free with no evidence of recurrent valve obstruction, regurgitation, or infection. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperation for stentless xenograft failure is a rare overall event. Implant of the O'Brien-Angell valve may be associated with a higher prevalence of early reintervention because of nonstructural failure. When needed, reoperation on a stentless xenograft is generally a simple procedure and carries a low surgical risk.

Aged↗

Reoperation in patients with biliary atresia.

Twenty-seven reoperations were done on 23 patients among 100 infants with biliary atresia who have been treated at Tohoku University Hospital between 1971 and 1981. Nineteen patients had a single reoperation and 4 patients had 2 reoperations. We present the results and the role of reoperation in biliary atresia patients in our institution. Excellent bile drainage after reoperation was obtained in 13 of 15 patients with good bile flow after the initial operation. On the contrary, good bile drainage was not obtained by reoperation in 8 of 12 cases without active bile flow after the initial operation. Cessation of bile flow after successful initial operation is an absolute indication for reoperation. Aggressive reoperations under proper indications improve the surgical results in biliary atresia patients.

Age Factors↗

Reoperation for recurrent chronic visceral ischemia.

PURPOSE: Recurrent visceral ischemia after a failed visceral revascularization occurs in up to one third of patients, yet no comprehensive report has described the management of this problem. The purpose of this study was to examine the presentation, surgical management, and outcome of patients with recurrent visceral ischemia. METHODS: Between 1959 and 1997, 109 patients underwent primary visceral revascularization at the University of California, San Francisco. Nineteen patients (17.4%) had recurrent visceral ischemia (12 chronic visceral ischemia, seven acute visceral ischemia). Fourteen additional patients with recurrent chronic visceral ischemia were referred after failed primary revascularization (two patients underwent multiple operations before referral). Thirty visceral reoperations were performed for recurrent visceral ischemia in 24 patients (10 patients with recurrence at University of California, San Francisco, 14 referred patients). Symptom-free and overall survival rates were determined by life table analysis. RESULTS: Of seven patients (6.4%) who had recurrent acute visceral ischemia, six (85.7%) died of bowel infarction. Twelve patients (11%) had recurrent chronic visceral ischemia. Patients with recurrent chronic visceral ischemia received their diagnoses earlier and lost less weight than at their initial presentation (p = 0.004 and 0.001, respectively). Recurrent ischemia was associated with younger age, greater weight loss, and modification of surgical technique at the time of initial operation (p = 0.5, 0.009, and 0.02, respectively). For 20 (90.9%) of the 22 first reoperations, antegrade aortovisceral bypass (n = 10) or transaortic visceral endarterectomy (n = 10) was used. Multiple techniques (four antegrade bypass, two retrograde bypass, one endarterectomy, one anastomotic revision) were used in the eight second or third reoperations. Postoperative mortality and complication rates were 6.7% and 33.3%, respectively. Symptoms recurred in six of 22 patients (27.3%) after the first reoperation, three of whom were cured or improved after additional reoperations. The life table symptom-free survival rate after reoperation was 77.3% and 62.8% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. The life table overall survival rate after reoperation was 74.6% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent visceral ischemia is not uncommon after primary visceral revascularization. These results show that reoperation for recurrent chronic visceral ischemia can be accomplished safely and effectively with established revascularization techniques. Furthermore, after repeat visceral revascularization patients achieve durable relief of symptoms and have life expectancy rates comparable with those of patients who undergo primary visceral revascularization.

Chronic Disease↗

Reoperation results after segmental prosthetic replacement of bone and joint for limb salvage.

Thirty-eight patients who had undergone reoperations because of complications or implant failure subsequent to a prosthetic replacement for limb salvage procedure for the treatment of musculoskeletal neoplasm were followed until death or a minimum of 2 years, then reviewed. The mean follow-up time before reoperation was 35 months, and the mean follow-up time after reoperation was 51 months. The major indication for reoperation was aseptic loosening (34%). The reoperative procedures included 19 major revisions of the prosthesis and 19 other reconstructions. There were 7 complications, including 1 local tumor recurrence. Twelve patients died of metastatic disease at a mean of 16 months after reoperation. The probability for patient survival was 74% beyond 3 years and 67% after 5 years. The surgical staging, site of tumor involvement, and type of reoperation all correlated with long-term patient survival. Overall, 72% of the patients achieved excellent or good functional results: a rate that was slightly inferior to that of the initial arthroplasty. Despite this, 84% of the implants demonstrated either excellent or good performance at 5 years. Therefore, reoperation because of a failed initial prosthesis or for other reasons after a limb salvage procedure using custom-designed or modular-segmental bone and joint implants seems feasible with no significant effect on subsequent functional performance or on patient survival.

Adolescent↗

Early reoperation rates after arterial surgery.

Between 1 January 1985 and 31 December 1991, 2426 patients underwent arterial surgery. Three hundred and seventy one reoperations were performed on 258 patients within 30 days of the initial procedure. One hundred and ninety three (52%) of the operations were attempted revascularisations, 95 (26%) were amputations and 58 (16%) were to control bleeding. One hundred and sixty nine (66%) of first operations were successful, but 76 patients required a further 113 reoperations. The mortality of reoperation was 16%, while the mortality of patients not requiring reoperation was 9% (p < 0.01). The mean hospital stay in days was higher in patients requiring reoperation (p < 0.05). Where appropriate, patients should be informed of the significant incidence of reoperation and reoperative mortality after vascular surgery. The increased hospital stay in reoperated patients has financial implications.

Adolescent↗

Reoperations for acute prosthetic thrombosis and pannus: an assessment of rates, relationship and risk.

OBJECTIVE: Mechanical valvular prostheses have the advantage of longevity but carry a risk of thrombosis which is dependant on valve design, materials and host-related interface. While pannus is common to both biologic and mechanical valves, acute prosthetic thrombosis is mostly a complication of mechanical valves; therefore we investigated to find rates and risk of these obstructive complications. METHODS: Between 1/1/70 and 31/12/97, 2680 patients received at least one mechanical prosthesis in the aortic or mitral or tricuspid position and a total of 3014 operations were performed. Follow-up included 18523 years and was 98% complete. Incidence rates, Kaplan-Meier estimates, modeling of the hazard and multivariate analysis in the hazard domain were used in the analysis. RESULTS: Overall survival was 76%, 64%, 51%, 38.5% and 29% at 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 years, respectively. It was significantly better in aortic than in mitral than in double prosthesis. 290 patients received a single reoperation, 37 a second, six a third and one a fourth reoperation. Two-hundred and fifty-one of these reoperations were exclusively due to malfunction of mechanical prosthesis, nine to malfunction of both mechanic and biologic prostheses. Most frequent reoperative indications was dehiscence (133), pannus (48) and thrombosis (29). The linearized rate of reoperations for pannus was 0.24%/patient per year, for valvular thrombosis 0.15%/patient per year. The shape of the thrombotic hazard was constant (at random) and the relative risk 12 times higher for tricuspid prosthesis, seven times higher for mitral prosthesis. Multivariate analysis controlling for prosthetic position, age, sex and prosthetic size, showed a 67% risk reduction with larger prosthesis (>27 mm), a 69% risk reduction with the Sorin tilting disk prosthesis and an 83% risk reduction with the bileaflet prosthesis. Pannus hazard shows a delayed exponential rise and was two times higher in tricuspid and three times higher in mitral position. Multivariate analysis showed a 50% risk reduction with larger prosthesis, an 11 times higher hazard of old (caged-disk, caged ball) prosthesis and a three times higher hazard of Lillehei-Kaster prosthesis. Reoperation for thrombosis has a 62% perioperative (30 days) survival compared to 92% survival of pannus reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical valves have a low incidence of reoperation, mostly for prosthetic dehiscence. Pannus development is the next frequent complication increasing with time since implant, therefore in this series it was related to old valvular models and tilting disk prosthesis, with longer follow-up. Acute thrombosis occurs significantly earlier than pannus formation. Despite shorter follow-up we are therefore confident that bileaflet prostheses are less prone to this complication and pannus is a rare early etiologic factor. Thrombosis has very high operative risk as compared to pannus, justifying the present trend to thrombolysate selected cases.

Acute Disease↗

Risk factor analysis for proximal and distal reoperations after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine significant risk factors for proximal or distal reoperations after surgical correction of acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS: Between 1980 and 2000, a total of 160 consecutive patients (mean age 57.5 +/- 13.3 years, 126 men) underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. Proximal repair was performed by means of ascending aorta replacement with valve resuspension in 130 cases (81.3%), composite graft replacement in 19 cases (11.9%), separate aortic valve and ascending aorta replacement in 7 cases (4.4%), and aortic repair in 1 case (0.6%). Distal repair required arch replacement in 23 cases. Follow-up time averaged 4.51 +/- 5.6 years per patient. RESULTS: Survival estimates after initial operation were 66.1% +/- 3.8%, 57.7% +/- 4.2%, 52.2% +/- 4.6%, and 42.5% +/- 5.8% at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Thirty patients required 37 reoperations at a mean interval of 5.7 +/- 4.5 years after the initial operation. Freedoms from reoperation were 96.9% +/- 1.8%, 74.7% +/- 5.3%, 60.8% +/- 6.8%, and 39.3% +/- 9.1% at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Reoperations included procedures on the proximal aorta (aortic root or valve) in 21 cases and on the distal aorta or its side branches in 19 cases. Cox regression analysis distinguished severe preoperative aortic valve insufficiency as the only significant risk factors for proximal reoperation; younger patient age, more distal extent of dissection, and more recent operative date were found to be significant risk factors for distal reoperation. CONCLUSION: Patients with acute type A aortic dissection who have severe aortic valve insufficiency are at increased risk for proximal reoperation. These patients should benefit from a more aggressive proximal repair at initial operation. Distal extent of aortic resection at initial operation did not significantly influence the risk of distal reoperation.

Acute Disease↗

The reoperative potential of infrainguinal bypass: long-term limb and patient survival.

The present study reviews the fate of patients undergoing reoperation after failure of infrainguinal bypass grafts. During a 10-year period, 202 patients with failed distal bypass grafts had 389 infrainguinal reoperative procedures, an average of 1.9 reoperations per patient. Including the initial procedure and subsequent reoperations, a total of 591 operations were performed in this group. Secondary bypass was performed in 101 patients, a tertiary procedure in 51, a fourth bypass in 30, and more than four operations were required in 20 patients. Reoperation was performed to treat severe ischemia (rest pain, ulceration, or gangrene) in 377 of 389 cases (97%). Repetitive bypass was performed with autogenous vein in 21 cases (7.4%), composite grafts in 16 patients (5.6%), and polytetrafluoroethylene in 247 cases (87%). The remaining 105 reoperations were thrombectomy in 77 cases, thrombectomy plus distal angioplasty in 20 cases, and profundaplasty in eight cases. The distal anastomosis was to the popliteal artery in 14% of reoperative cases and to the tibial or peroneal artery in 59%. Mean follow-up for all patients was 70 months. Four operative deaths occurred in 389 reoperations (1.0%), and there were 35 late deaths. The cumulative life-table 5-year survival rate for all patients was 80%. The operative morbidity rate was 12.3%, including wound infection in 3.1% and hematoma in 6.4%. Sixty-seven cases required major amputation, below-knee in 48 (72%) and above-knee in 19 (28%). The 5-year limb salvage rate was 59%. Cumulative graft patency was 37% at 5 years. The 80% 5-year survival rate may reflect aggressive management of associated carotid and coronary artery disease. The demonstrated long survival indicates that recurrent ischemia after distal bypass failure requires attention. In this study, re-operation provided long-term limb salvage in most cases without significant compromise in patient safety or amputation level if amputation was required.

Amputation, Surgical↗

Predictors of reoperation following operative management of fractures of the tibial shaft.

BACKGROUND: Accurate prediction of likelihood of reoperation in patients with tibial shaft fractures would facilitate optimal management. Previous studies were limited by small sample sizes and noncomprehensive examination of possible risk factors. OBJECTIVE: We conducted an observational study to determine which prognostic factors were associated with an increased risk of reoperation following operative treatment in a heterogeneous population of patients with tibial shaft fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. METHODS: We identified 200 patients with tibial shaft fractures from two university-affiliated centers. Two reviewers independently abstracted data regarding 20 possible prognostic variables, reviewed preoperative and postoperative radiographs, and documented reoperations (defined as any surgical procedure </=1 year after the initial surgery that was aimed specifically at achieving bony union of the fracture, including bone grafts, implant exchanges, or débridement for infections). We chose a Cox proportion hazards model to conduct a survival analysis for time to reoperation and constructed a multivariable model to estimate the relative risk of reoperation and associated 95%confidence interval (CI) for each predictor variable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to reoperation following the initial surgery. RESULTS: Complete follow-up information was available for 192 of 200 (96%) patients. Three variables predicted reoperation: the presence of an open fracture wound (relative risk 4.32, 95% CI 1.76 to 11.26), lack of cortical continuity between the fracture ends following fixation (relative risk 8.33, 95% CI 3.03 to 25.0), and the presence of a transverse fracture (relative risk 20.0, 95% CI 4.34 to 142.86). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a set of three simple prognostic variables (open fracture, transverse fracture, and postoperative fracture gap) that can assist surgeons in predicting reoperation following operative treatment of tibial shaft fractures.

Adult↗

5-year reoperation rates after different types of lumbar spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Population-based cohort study of Washington State patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions in 1988. OBJECTIVES: To compare complications and reoperation rates during the 5-year period after surgery between patients who have undergone lumbar spine fusion surgery and those who have undergone laminectomy or discectomy alone. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal fusion is associated with wider surgical exposure, more extensive dissection, and longer operative times than lumbar surgery without fusion, and previous studies have shown higher complication rates and hospital charges associated with these more complex procedures. In elderly patients, spinal fusion operations were associated with higher mortality rates than laminectomy or discectomy alone, and reoperation rates were not lower. In the current study, reoperations, mortality, and complications following lumbar spine surgery were examined for the general population. METHODS: A statewide hospital discharge database was used to identify all Washington patients who underwent spine surgery in 1988 and to determine the rate of reoperation during the subsequent 5 years. Administrative records also were used to identify complications, mortality, and hospital charges associated with the operations. Unadjusted complication and reoperation rates for the groups were compared using chi-square statistics. Adjusted rates were compared using logistic regression and proportional hazards (Cox) regression after controlling for age, gender, prior spine surgery, diagnosis, comorbidity, type of surgery, and coverage by Workers' Compensation. RESULTS: Of 6376 patients who underwent lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions in Washington in 1988, 1041 (16%) had operations involving spine fusion. Diagnoses of degenerative disc disease or possible instability were more frequent among patients undergoing fusion surgery, whereas herniated discs were more frequent among those undergoing discectomy or laminectomy alone. Complications were recorded in 18% of fusion patients and 7% of nonfusion patients (P < 0.01), but mortality rates did not differ. Unadjusted reoperation rates over the 5-year period were greater for patients who underwent fusion than for patients who underwent nonfusion surgery (18% vs. 15%, respectively), but after adjustment for baseline characteristics, fusion patients had only a slightly greater (and nonsignificant) risk of reoperation (relative risk 1.1, confidence interval .9-1.3). CONCLUSION: As in previous studies, complications in the current study occurred more frequently among patients who underwent lumbar spine fusion than among those who underwent laminectomy or discectomy alone. Reoperations were at least as frequent after fusion, but the authors could not assess treatment efficacy in terms of pain relief or improved function. Although the characteristics of patients undergoing fusion differed from those undergoing a laminectomy or discectomy alone, there appeared to be sufficient overlap in the clinical populations to warrant closer scrutiny of the safety, efficacy, and indications for spinal fusions, preferably in randomized trials.

Adult↗

Reoperation after limb preservation surgery for sarcomas of the knee in children.

Limb preservation surgery compares favorably with amputation in oncologic and functional outcomes. However, an increased incidence of complications and reoperations is associated with limb preservation. This study compared the outcome of a group of young patients who required at least one reoperation after limb preservation surgery because of a complication or need for prosthetic lengthening with the outcome of a similar group who did not require additional surgery. The functional scores before and after reoperation are compared to determine the impact on reported function and patient satisfaction. Forty-four consecutive patients younger than 19 years were treated for a malignancy of the distal femur or proximal tibia. Six of these patients required an amputation because of extensive disease or inadequate response to chemotherapy. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional evaluation scores of 26 patients who required at least one reoperation (Group A) were compared with the scores of 10 patients who have not required additional surgery (Group B). Average before and after reoperation functional scores were compared to discern a decline in function with time. The minimum followup was 2 years. Patients in Group A required 54 reoperations. No difference in mean functional scores between Group A and Group B was detected. Likewise, after isolating Group A scores, no significant difference was detected between the average functional scores before (67%) and after (68%) reoperation or lengthening. Despite relatively small numbers, the current study suggests that adequate function is maintained despite reoperation or revision in young patients with malignancies of the knee who have limb preservation surgery.

Adolescent↗

"Out points" criteria for breast implant removal without replacement and criteria to minimize reoperations following breast augmentation.

Breast augmentation is a totally elective, medically unnecessary procedure, and surgeons and patients must prioritize minimizing tradeoffs, costs, and risks at the primary operation and at reoperations. At the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's advisory panel hearings in October of 2003 to consider approval of conventional silicone gel implants, data documented an overall reoperation rate of 20 percent at just 3 years after primary breast augmentation. Subsequently, the premarket approval was not granted. Similarly high reoperation rates have been reported in previous saline and silicone gel premarket approval studies over the past two decades, demonstrating that high reoperation rates are not device dependent and suggesting a need to reexamine surgical management criteria. Bilateral implant removal without replacement limits additional reoperations in a wide range of clinical situations. Surgeons and patients often prefer other options to avoid removal without replacement, but other options carry a higher tradeoffs, costs, and risks to the patient. If minimizing tradeoffs, costs, and risks of reoperations is a priority, surgeons must define and patients must understand and accept "out points," that is, specific criteria for bilateral implant removal without replacement. Defining out points is challenging. Enforcing them when difficult clinical situations occur is even more challenging. This article presents out points that have been incorporated into staged, repetitive informed consent documents and used in the author's practice for more than 10 years. In peer-reviewed and published reports of more than 1600 patients, these out points criteria, in conjunction with the TEPID system (tissue characteristics of the envelope, parenchyma, and implant and the dimensions and fill distribution dynamics of the implant) of implant and pocket selection based on individual patient quantifiable tissue criteria and surgical techniques that minimize tissue trauma and bleeding, resulted in an overall reoperation rate of 3 percent in 1662 reported cases with up to 7 years of follow-up, compared with the 20 percent reoperation rate at 3 years in the most recent Food and Drug Administration study.

Breast Implants↗

Effect of age and reoperation on survival in the combined modality treatment of malignant astrocytoma.

Before the advent of the operating microscope and the carbon dioxide laser, reoperations were performed in less than 5% of patients with malignant astrocytoma. Between 1978 and 1981, a consecutive series of 74 adult patients were prospectively treated therapy, all patients eligible for further treatment were offered reoperation with the microscope and/or laser before treatment with Phase I agents (microwave hyperthermia, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-Adriamycin, DMSO-Cytoxan, or azaridinylbenzoquinone (AZQ)). Forty-six per cent of the patients were referred from outside institutions for intensive treatment. In 36 months, 40 patients received second operations directed at their tumor and had a median calculated survival from the time of reoperation of 37 weeks. The length of survival after the second operation was independent of patient age, performance status, tumor grade, and interoperative interval. Sixty-five per cent of patients under 40 and 48% of patients over 40 underwent reoperation with minimal morbidity and no deaths. The single most important prognostic factor for survival in both reoperated and single-operated patients was age. Tumor grade had no influence on survival in the series as a whole, in patients under 40 years of age, or in reoperated patients. The calculated median survival for the entire series was 15 months, with a predicted 2-year survival rate of 0.25. These figures include all patients treated without exclusion for incomplete radiotherapy or chemotherapy. It is concluded that reoperation for malignant astrocytoma is safe, feasible, and of potential benefit in combination with other therapies. The routine use of reoperation to "set up" other treatment modalities deserves further study.

Adolescent↗

Reoperation for recurrent glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma.

The advisability of a second operation for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme or anaplastic astrocytoma depends on the expected duration and quality of subsequent survival. We reviewed the results in 70 consecutive patients who underwent reoperation for supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme (n = 39) or anaplastic astrocytoma (n = 31) between 1975 and 1984. The operative morbidity rate was 5.7% (4 of 70 patients); the 6-week postoperative mortality rate was 4.3% (3 of 70 patients). The median duration of survival after reoperation was 36 weeks in patients with glioblastoma multiforme and 88 weeks in those with anaplastic astrocytoma. The median duration of high quality survival (defined as the period during which the patient had a Karnofsky performance score of at least 70) after reoperation was 10 weeks for patients with glioblastoma multiforme and 83 weeks for patients with anaplastic astrocytoma. Age and preoperative Karnofsky score in patients with glioblastoma multiforme and age in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma had statistically significant effects on the duration of high quality survival after reoperation, but not on postoperative survival independent of quality. Although age and functional status do not significantly affect the duration of survival after reoperation, they do have a significant effect on the quality of life after reoperation. Frequently, a patient can expect to spend a greater portion of his life at a higher level of function than he would have without reoperation. As adjunctive forms of therapy improve, reoperation will play an increasingly prominent role in the management of recurrent malignant astrocytic tumors.

Adult↗

Reoperative laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an experience with 49 cases.

BACKGROUND: Long-term complications leading to reoperation after primary bariatric surgery are not uncommon. Reoperations are particularly challenging because of tissue scarring and adhesions related to the first operation. Reoperations must address the complication(s) related to the scarring and, at the same time, prevent weight regain that would inevitably occur after simple reversal. Conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) has repeatedly been demonstrated to be the procedure of choice in most situations. It has traditionally been performed through an open approach. Our aim is to describe our experience with the laparoscopic approach in reoperations to RYGBP over the past 5 years. METHODS: All patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGBP as a reoperation were included in this study. Patients with multiple previous operations or patients with band erosion after gastric banding were submitted to laparotomy. Data were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Between June 1999 and August 2004, 49 patients (44 women, 5 men) underwent laparoscopic reoperative RYGBP. The first operation was gastric banding in 32 and vertical banded gastroplasty in 15. The mean duration of the reoperation was 195 minutes. No conversion to open was necessary. Overall morbidity was 20%, with major complications in 2 patients (4%). Weight loss, or weight maintenance, was satisfactory, with a BMI <35 kg/m2 up to 4 years in close to 75% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic RYGBP can be safely performed as a reoperation in selected patients provided that the surgical expertise is available. These procedures are clearly more difficult than primary operations, as reflected by the long operative time. Overall morbidity and mortality, however, are not different. Long-term results regarding weight loss or weight maintenance are highly satisfactory, and comparable to those obtained after laparoscopic RYGBP as a primary operation.

Adult↗

The risks and benefits of reoperative aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Many patients are advised to have mechanical aortic valve replacement (AVR) because their expected longevity exceeds that of tissue prostheses. This strategy may avoid the risks of reoperation but exposes patients to the risks of long-term anticoagulation therapy. Which risk is greater? METHODS: We reviewed the records of 1213 consecutive, unselected AVR patients, 60% of whom had concomitant procedures, who were treated from 1994 through 2002. Of these patients, 887 were first-time AVR patients, and 326 underwent reoperation. Of the reoperation patients, 134 had previously undergone AVR (redo). We constructed a risk model from these 1213 cases to assess the factors that predicted mortality and to examine the extent to which reoperation affected outcome. RESULTS: Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that factors of reoperation and redo operation did not predict mortality. In fact, the mortality rate was 4.1% for all first AVR operations and 3.1% for all reoperation AVR ( P =.891). Significant predicting factors (with odds ratios) were reoperative dialysis (6.03), preoperative shock (3.68), New York Heart Association class IV (2.20), female sex (1.76), age (1.61), and cardiopulmonary bypass time (1.26). CONCLUSIONS: In this series, the risk of reoperation AVR is comparable with the published risks of long-term warfarin sodium (Coumadin) administration after mechanical AVR. Any adult who requires AVR may be well advised to consider tissue prostheses.

Aged↗