SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Tacrolimus”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

PubMed1998

Effects of intestinal and hepatic metabolism on the bioavailability of tacrolimus in rats.

PURPOSE: Tacrolimus, an immunosuppressive agent, has poor and variable bioavailability following oral administration in clinical use. We investigated the contribution of intestinal metabolism to the first pass effect of tacrolimus in rats. METHODS: Tacrolimus was administered intravenously, intraportally or intraintestinally to rats. Blood samples were collected over a 240-min period, and blood tacrolimus concentrations were measured. The extraction ratios of tacrolimus in the intestine and liver were investigated. In addition, the metabolism of tacrolimus in the everted sacs of the small intestine was examined. RESULTS: The rate of absorption of tacrolimus in the intestine was rapid, and tacrolimus was almost completely absorbed after intestinal administration. The bioavailability of tacrolimus was about 40% and 25% after intraportal and intraintestinal administration, respectively. indicating that tacrolimus is metabolized in both the intestine and the liver. In addition, tacrolimus was significantly metabolized in the everted sacs of the rat intestine. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggested that the metabolism of tacrolimus in the intestine contributes to its extensive and variable first pass metabolism following the oral administration.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

PubMed2000

Co-administration of furosemide augments tacrolimus-induced impairment in kidney function in rats.

Sodium-depletion in rats reproduces functional and morphological tacrolimus nephrotoxicity observed in man. Potent diuretics induce sodium-depletion. Our objective was to determine the effect of a loop diuretic furosemide on tacrolimus-mediated functional and pathological impairment of the kidney in rats. Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups; group 1, rats received vehicle (saline) only; group 2, rats were treated with tacrolimus (1 mg/kg body weight) and furosemide (5 mg/kg body weight); group 3, rats were treated with tacrolimus alone; and group 4, rats were treated with furosemide (5 mg/kg body weight) alone. On day 28, tail blood pressure was measured and the rats were placed in metabolic cages for urine collection. After 24 hr the rats were sacrificed. Tacrolimus alone tended to cause growth retardation, hypotension, hypomagnesemia and a rise in blood urea nitrogen. Furosemide co-administration enhanced the effects of tacrolimus on hypotension, hypomagnesemia and a rise in blood urea nitrogen. The renal histology characterized by cytoplasmic vacuolization of the proximal tubules was not different between the rats treated with both tacrolimus and furosemide and the rats treated with tacrolimus alone. A strong immunostaining for FKBP-12, a tacrolimus-binding protein, was observed in the medulla of the kidneys of rats treated with tacrolimus either with or without furosemide. These results indicate that furosemide further augments tacrolimus induced impairment in kidney function, and that furosemide should be used with discretion in patients on tacrolimus therapy.

Animals↗

PubMed1995

Capillary blood versus arterial or venous blood for tacrolimus monitoring in liver transplantation.

Tacrolimus has been found to be useful in clinical solid organ transplantation. A very careful monitoring of the tacrolimus levels and dose adjustments are essential, at least in the immediate post-liver transplantation, situation. However, quite often after liver transplantation, patients have limited venous access for daily monitoring of tacrolimus levels. When the blood is sampled from a multilumen central venous catheter, used also for intravenous administration of tacrolimus, falsely elevated concentrations of tacrolimus have been observed. The present study examines the concentration of tacrolimus in capillary blood samples obtained from finger stick and compares its concentrations in simultaneously drawn samples from arterial line, peripheral venous puncture, and multilumen centrally placed venous catheter from the port used for tacrolimus infusion and the port not used for tacrolimus infusion. Ten adult post-liver transplantation recipients were studied. Whole blood concentration of tacrolimus in capillary blood was comparable to that of arterial blood, as well as to that of peripheral venous blood samples (r2 = 0.99; P = 0.72). Concentrations of tacrolimus in venous blood drawn from the port of the multilumen catheter used for intravenous tacrolimus infusion were 3-23 times higher (P = 0.0015), while the concentrations of venous blood drawn from the port not used for tacrolimus infusion were 1.7-4.5 times higher (P = 0.016), as compared with arterial, capillary, or peripheral venous whole blood concentrations.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Randomized trial of tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine versus cyclosporine oral solution (modified) plus mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation: results at 2 years.

BACKGROUND: A previous report described the 1-year results of a prospective, randomized trial designed to investigate the optimal combination of immunosuppressants in kidney transplantation. Recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were treated with tacrolimus+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine oral solution (modified) (CsA)+MMF, or tacrolimus+azathioprine (AZA). Results at 1 year revealed that optimal efficacy and safety were achieved with a regimen containing tacrolimus+MMF. The present report describes results at 2 years. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-three recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were randomized to receive tacrolimus+MMF, CsA+MMF, or tacrolimus+AZA. All regimens contained corticosteroids, and antibody induction was used only in patients who experienced delayed graft function. Patients were followed up for 2 years. RESULTS: The results at 2 years corroborate and extend the findings of the previous report. Patients randomized to either treatment arm containing tacrolimus experienced improved kidney function. New-onset insulin dependence remained in four, three, and four patients in the tacrolimus+MMF, CsA+MMF, and tacrolimus+AZA treatment arms, respectively. Furthermore, patients with delayed graft function/acute tubular necrosis who were treated with tacrolimus+MMF experienced a 23% increase in allograft survival compared with patients receiving CsA+MMF (P=0.06). Patients randomized to tacrolimus+MMF received significantly lower doses of MMF compared with those administered CsA+MMF. CONCLUSIONS: All three immunosuppressive regi-mens provided excellent safety and efficacy. How-ever, the best results overall were achieved with tacrolimus+MMF. The combination may provide particular benefit to kidney allograft recipients who develop delayed graft function/acute tubular necrosis. Renal function at 2 years was better in the tacrolimus treatment groups compared with the CsA group.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2003

Reversal of acute tacrolimus-induced renal vasoconstriction by theophylline in rats.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether theophylline, a nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist and phosphodiesterase inhibitor, reverses the acute declines in renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate induced by high-dose tacrolimus in rats. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled experimental study. SETTING: University-based basic science research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. INTERVENTIONS: After mechanical ventilation and instrumentation under isoflurane and nitrous oxide anesthesia, animals received either tacrolimus 0.5 mg/kg intravenously or vehicle and 1 hr later either theophylline 4 mg/kg intravenously or vehicle. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: By using radiolabeled microspheres, renal blood flow was measured in three groups: control (n = 5), tacrolimus plus vehicle (n = 6), and tacrolimus plus theophylline (n = 6) at four time points-baseline and 60, 75, and 90 mins after tacrolimus or vehicle (the latter two time points being 15 and 30 mins after theophylline or vehicle, respectively). Whole blood tacrolimus and serum theophylline concentrations were measured. In a separate group of animals, by using (51)Cr-EDTA, glomerular filtration rate was measured in two groups: tacrolimus plus vehicle (n = 5) and tacrolimus plus theophylline (n = 5) at baseline and over two consecutive 20-min time periods beginning 61 mins posttacrolimus. Urine flow rate also was measured. Following tacrolimus, both renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate declined in parallel by approximately 33% and 50% from baseline after 75 and 90 mins, respectively (p <.05 by two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance). Theophylline completely reversed these tacrolimus-induced decreases in renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate. Urine flow rate also increased in response to theophylline. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose theophylline reverses tacrolimus-induced declines in renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate observed in an acute model of tacrolimus toxicity. Theophylline's effect in chronic toxicity remains to be determined.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2003

Tacrolimus and lopinavir/ritonavir interaction in liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To report an interaction between tacrolimus and the protease inhibitor combination lopinavir/ritonavir in a liver transplant patient. CASE SUMMARY: A 48-year-old white male liver transplant recipient receiving tacrolimus 5 mg twice daily for immunosuppression started highly active antiretroviral therapy for his HIV-positive status. Three days after initiation of lopinavir/ritonavir, the tacrolimus concentration rose sharply to toxic levels. Subsequent tacrolimus doses were withheld until tacrolimus concentrations normalized over 15 days. The tacrolimus dose was reestablished at a much lower dose, 0.5 mg once weekly. An objective causality assessment revealed that the adverse event was highly probable. DISCUSSION: Tacrolimus is metabolized in the liver via CYP3A4. Protease inhibitors are known to inhibit CYP3A4 and have been documented to increase tacrolimus concentrations, putting the patient at risk of developing nephrotoxic and/or neurotoxic symptoms. In this case, concomitant use of lopinavir/ritonavir caused tacrolimus concentrations to rise more dramatically than had been previously reported in the literature for other protease inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Extreme caution must be used when administering tacrolimus concomitantly with lopinavir/ritonavir. Therapeutic concentrations of tacrolimus can be maintained with tacrolimus doses that are far below standard dosages.

Drug Interactions↗

PubMed2004

Tacrolimus toxicity associated with concomitant metoclopramide therapy.

Subtherapeutic tacrolimus trough concentrations were noted in a 52-year-old woman who had undergone liver transplantation. Her tacrolimus dosage was increased from 7 to 28 mg twice/day, and ketoconazole therapy was added; however, her tacrolimus concentration remained undetectable. Metoclopramide 10 mg 4 times/day was begun to control the patient's new-onset nausea and vomiting. Within 48 hours of increasing the dosage to 20 mg 4 times/day, her tacrolimus trough concentration exceeded 30 ng/ml. Signs and symptoms were suggestive of tacrolimus nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. According to the Naranjo scale, this adverse drug event was probably the result of improved absorption of tacrolimus secondary to metoclopramide therapy. The patient's subtherapeutic tacrolimus concentration at baseline was probably secondary to poor absorption due to impaired gastric emptying. Coadministration of metoclopramide significantly improved gastric motility and delivery of tacrolimus to the small intestine, increasing tacrolimus bioavailability, thus resulting in acute-onset tacrolimus toxicity. When tacrolimus is administered with metoclopramide in patients with gastric dysmotility, tacrolimus concentrations should be monitored closely to minimize the risk of toxicity.

Antiemetics↗

PubMed2002

Pharmacokinetic interaction between tacrolimus and diltiazem: dose-response relationship in kidney and liver transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: To study the dose-response relationship of the pharmacokinetic interaction between diltiazem and tacrolimus in kidney and liver transplant recipients. DESIGN: Nonrandomised seven-period stepwise pharmacokinetic study. PATIENTS: Stable kidney (n = 2) and liver (n = 2) transplant recipients maintained on oral tacrolimus twice daily but not taking diltiazem. METHODS: Patients were treated with seven incremental dosages of diltiazem (0 to 180 mg/day) at > or = 2-weekly intervals. At the end of each interval, 13 blood samples were taken over a 24-hour period to allow determination of morning (AUC(12)), evening (AUC(12-24)) and 24-hour (AUC(24)) areas under the concentration-time curve for tacrolimus, as well as AUC(24) for diltiazem and three of its metabolites. RESULTS: There was considerable interpatient variability in tacrolimus-sparing effect. In the two kidney transplant recipients, an increase in tacrolimus AUC(24) occurred following the 20 mg/day dosage of diltiazem (26 and 67%). The maximum increase in tacrolimus AUC(24) occurred at the maximum diltiazem dosage used (180 mg/day), when the increase was 48 and 177%. In the two liver transplant recipients, an increase in tacrolimus AUC(24) did not occur until a higher diltiazem dosage (60 to 120 mg/day) was given. The increase at the maximum diltiazem dosages used (120 mg/day in one and 180 mg/day in the other) was also lower (18 and 22%) than that exhibited by the kidney transplant recipients. The increase in tacrolimus AUC(12) was similar to the increase in AUC(12-24) when diltiazem was given in the morning only (dosages < or = 60 mg/day). Hence, diltiazem affects blood tacrolimus concentrations for longer than would be predicted from the half-life of diltiazem in plasma. CONCLUSIONS: The mean tacrolimus-sparing effect of diltiazem was similar in magnitude to the cyclosporin-sparing effect previously reported. Whether the lesser tacrolimus-sparing effect with diltiazem seen in the liver transplant recipients was due to functional differences in the transplanted liver is not known, but it was not due to lower plasma diltiazem concentrations. Diltiazem makes a logical tacrolimus-sparing agent because of the potential financial savings and therapeutic benefits. Because of interpatient variability, the sparing effect should be demonstrated in each patient and not merely assumed.

Area Under Curve↗

PubMed2004

Tacrolimus suppresses glucose-induced insulin release from pancreatic islets by reducing glucokinase activity.

Tacrolimus is widely used for immunosuppressant therapy, including various organ transplantations. One of its main side effects is hyperglycemia due to reduced insulin secretion, but the mechanism remains unknown. We have investigated the metabolic effects of tacrolimus on insulin secretion at a concentration that does not influence insulin content. Twenty-four-hour exposure to 3 nM tacrolimus reduced high glucose (16.7 mM)-induced insulin secretion (control 2.14 +/- 0.08 vs. tacrolimus 1.75 +/- 0.02 ng.islet(-1).30 min(-1), P < 0.01) without affecting insulin content. In dynamic experiments, insulin secretion and NAD(P)H fluorescence during a 20-min period after 10 min of high-glucose exposure were reduced in tacrolimus-treated islets. ATP content and glucose utilization of tacrolimus-treated islets in the presence of 16.7 mM glucose were less than in control (ATP content: control 9.69 +/- 0.99 vs. tacrolimus 6.52 +/- 0.40 pmol/islet, P < 0.01; glucose utilization: control 103.8 +/- 6.9 vs. tacrolimus 74.4 +/- 5.1 pmol.islet(-1).90 min(-1), P < 0.01). However, insulin release from tacrolimus-treated islets was similar to that from control islets in the presence of 16.7 mM alpha-ketoisocaproate, a mitochondrial fuel. Glucokinase activity, which determines glycolytic velocity, was reduced by tacrolimus treatment (control 65.3 +/- 3.4 vs. tacrolimus 49.9 +/- 2.8 pmol.islet(-1).60 min(-1), P < 0.01), whereas hexokinase activity was not affected. These results indicate that glucose-stimulated insulin release is decreased by chronic exposure to tacrolimus due to reduced ATP production and glycolysis derived from reduced glucokinase activity.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Safety of tacrolimus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: long-term experience.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term safety of tacrolimus 3 mg/day in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients with active RA who had discontinued all DMARDs for at least 2 weeks and had at least five tender/painful joints and three swollen joints, and required DMARD treatment in the opinion of the investigator, were enrolled into this open-label long-term safety trial. In addition, patients who had completed at least 3 months of treatment with tacrolimus 2 mg/day, tacrolimus 3 mg/day or placebo in a Phase III double-blind efficacy trial were allowed to roll over into this study. This latter group of patients did not have to fulfil any joint count requirements prior to entry into the long-term safety study, provided that no more than 14 days had elapsed between the end of their participation in the double-blind study and screening for the long-term safety study. All patients enrolled received tacrolimus 3 mg/day in addition to their current regimen of NSAIDs and corticosteroids. RESULTS: 896 patients received at least one dose of tacrolimus 3 mg. The median duration of treatment was 359 days. 145 patients (16.2%) withdrew from the study for adverse events possibly or probably related to tacrolimus, 33 patients (3.7%) withdrew from the study for adverse events unrelated to tacrolimus and 112 (12.5%) withdrew for lack of efficacy. No adverse event with an incidence >0.7% appeared for the first time after the first 3 months of treatment with 3 mg tacrolimus. 529 patients (59%) experienced an adverse event that was possibly or probably related to tacrolimus; the most common were diarrhoea (14.6%), nausea (10.3%), tremor (9.0%), headache (8.7%), abdominal pain (7.9%), dyspepsia (7.6%), increased creatinine (6.8%) and hypertension (5.4%). Twenty-four patients (2.7%) experienced serious adverse events possibly or probably related to study drug; the most common were pneumonia (0.6%), hyperglycaemia (0.3%), gastroenteritis (0.2%), pancreatitis (0.2%) and diabetes mellitus (0.2%). The mean creatinine level increased from 67+/-19 micromol/l (0.76+/-0.22 mg/dl) at baseline to 75+/-26 micromol/l (0.85+/-0.30 mg/dl) (P<0.0001) at end of treatment. 351 (40.3%) of the 872 patients for whom creatinine levels were available at both baseline and during treatment had > or =30% increase from baseline in serum creatinine during the study, either related or unrelated to tacrolimus, with 73 patients (8.4%) having creatinine levels exceeding the normal range. At end of treatment, 177 patients (20.3%) had a > or =30% increase from baseline in creatinine. Serum creatinine remained within the normal range throughout the trial in approximately 90% of patients. At the end of treatment, the ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 response rates were 38.4%, 18.6% and 9.0% respectively. Over 26% of patients had at least a 70% improvement in both swollen and painful/tender joints. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that tacrolimus was safe and well-tolerated and provided clinical benefit over a period of at least 12 months.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A: a comparative study on rat renal allograft survival.

Although tacrolimus has been studied in a wide variety of experimental animal models, we are the first group to systematically study the effect of tacrolimus on rat renal allograft survival, as primary therapy and as anti-rejection therapy, in comparison with cyclosporin A (CyA). Renal grafts were transplanted from BN to LEW rats. Tacrolimus and CyA were administrated orally from day 0 for 50 days as primary therapy after grafting. Allografts were rejected after a median survival time (MST) of 8 days. Both tacrolimus und CyA significantly prolonged renal allograft survival, in a dose-dependent manner compared with the allograft controls. The most effective dose was 3.2 mg/kg, per day for tacrolimus, and 10 mg/kg per day for CyA. There was no significant difference in renal function between the group treated with the most effective dose of tacrolimus and the CyA-treated group. The percentage of detectable serum IL-2 level was 45% in the allograft control group, but was undetectable in groups treated with the most effective dose of tacrolimus or CyA at days 3 and 6 after grafting. On the other hand, no side effects were noted in recipient rats by daily inspection, body weight change, and histological studies, although minimal tubular vacuolation was encountered in the group treated with CyA 32 mg/kg per day. In addition, the most effective doses of tacrolimus and CyA were studied as anti-rejection therapy. All of the 5 recipients treated with tacrolimus from days 2-14, and 3 of the 5 treated from days 4-16 after grafting, survived for more than 50 days. However, the MST was 19 days for recipients treated with CyA from days 2-14, and 13 days for those treated from days 4-16 after grafting. In summary, tacrolimus as primary therapy induced rat renal allograft survival with renal function and side effects comparable with those of CyA. Interestingly, when both agents were used as anti-rejection therapy, tacrolimus, but not CyA, could significantly overcome ongoing renal allograft rejection in the rat.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1995

Clinical trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: A prospective clinical trial was undertaken to compare the efficacy of tacrolimus (FK 506) versus cyclosporine as the primary immunosuppressive agent after lung transplantation. METHODS: Between October 1991 and May 1994, 133 single-lung and bilateral-lung recipients were randomized to receive either cyclosporine (n = 67) or tacrolimus (n = 66). The two groups were similar in age, sex, and underlying disease. RESULTS: One-year and 2-year survival rates were similar in the two groups, although the trend was toward increased survival with tacrolimus. Acute rejection episodes per 100 patient-days were fewer (p = 0.07) in the tacrolimus group (0.85) than in the cyclosporine group (1.09). Obliterative bronchiolitis developed in significantly fewer patients in the tacrolimus group (21.7%) compared with the cyclosporine group (38%) (p = 0.025), and there was greater freedom from obliterative bronchiolitis over time for patients receiving tacrolimus (p < 0.03). Significantly more cyclosporine-treated patients (n = 13) required crossover to tacrolimus than tacrolimus-treated patients to cyclosporine (n = 2) (p = 0.02). The switch to tacrolimus controlled persistent acute rejection in 6 of 9 patients. The overall incidence of infections was similar in the two groups, although bacterial infections were more common with cyclosporine (p = 0.0375), whereas the risk of fungal infection was higher with tacrolimus (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrates the advantage of tacrolimus in reducing the risk of obliterative bronchiolitis, the most important cause of long-term morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2006

Limited interaction between tacrolimus and P-glycoprotein in the rat small intestine.

The significance of intestinal P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in determining the oral bioavailability of tacrolimus has been still controversial. In this study, we reevaluated the interaction of tacrolimus with P-gp in the rat small intestine, by evaluating its absorption from the rat small intestine and its modulating effect on the absorption of known P-gp substrates (digoxin, methylprednisolone, and vinblastine). Intestinal absorption of tacrolimus itself was as extensive as other P-gp modulators such as cyclosporine and verapamil. While cyclosporine and verapamil significantly increased the absorption of methylprednisolone and vinblastine through potent inhibition of intestinal P-gp, tacrolimus failed to achieve this. When cyclosporine and tacrolimus were intravenously administered to rats, digoxin absorption was significantly increased by cyclosporine but not by tacrolimus. When tacrolimus was coadministered with clotrimazole, a specific CYP3A inhibitor, into the rat small intestine, the area under the curve of tacrolimus blood concentrations increased more than seven-fold compared with that of tacrolimus alone. Our present results strongly suggest that the interaction between tacrolimus and P-gp is limited in the rat small intestine and that extensive metabolism by CYP3A enzymes is more responsible for the low oral bioavailability of tacrolimus. It was considered that the extensive absorption of cyclosporine and verapamil was closely associated with their potent ability to inhibit intestinal P-gp.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

PubMed2003

Establishment of new preparation method for solid dispersion formulation of tacrolimus.

The aim of this study was to establish a new preparation method for solid dispersion formulation (SDF) of tacrolimus, a poorly water-soluble drug, without dichloromethane, because no use of dichloromethane is recommended by ICH harmonized tripartite guideline. To select the appropriate carrier, three different SDFs with polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG 6000), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) were prepared by the conventional solvent method, in which tacrolimus and the carrier were completely dissolved in the mixture of dichloromethane and ethanol. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) patterns indicated that tacrolimus exists in an amorphous state in all three SDFs. The supersaturated dissolution profiles of tacrolimus were observed in all SDFs, and the highest level of supersaturation for tacrolimus was obtained and maintained for 24h from SDF with HPMC. On the other hand, the supersaturated level from SDF with PEG 6000 or PVP decreased rapidly. The in vivo oral absorption study in dogs showed that bioavailability of tacrolimus from SDF with HPMC was remarkably improved compared with the crystalline powder. It was clarified that HPMC is the most appropriate carrier for SDF of tacrolimus. Then, SDF of tacrolimus was prepared by the new method, which allows us to make SDF of tacrolimus by swelling HPMC with ethanol, in which tacrolimus was completely dissolved. This new method does not need dichloromethane. The physicochemical properties of SDF with HPMC prepared by the new method were the same as those of SDF prepared by the conventional solvent method. Furthermore, SDF with HPMC prepared by the new method was still stable after stored at 40 degrees C for 3 months. The pharmacokinetic parameters after oral administration in monkeys showed no significant difference (P>0.01) between SDFs with HPMC prepared by the two methods. In conclusion, we have established the new preparation method for SDF of tacrolimus with HPMC and the new method makes it possible to prepare SDF of tacroliumus without dichloromethane.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2005

Conversion of stable kidney transplant recipients from a twice daily Prograf-based regimen to a once daily modified release tacrolimus-based regimen.

UNLABELLED: Modified release (MR) tacrolimus is an extended release formulation administered once daily (qD). The purpose of this pharmacokinetic (PK) study was to evaluate tacrolimus exposure in stable kidney transplant recipients converted from Prograf twice a day to MR tacrolimus qD. METHODS: This was an open-label, multicenter study with a crossover design. Eligible patients were 18 to 65 years of age, more than 6 months posttransplant with stable renal function, and received stable Prograf doses more than 2 weeks prior to enrollment. Patients received Prograf twice a day through day 7; 24-hour PK profiles were obtained on days 1 and 7. Patients were converted to the same milligram-for-milligram daily dose of MR tacrolimus qD in the morning on day 8; 24-hour PK profiles were obtained for MR tacrolimus on days 8, 14, and 21. Laboratory and safety parameters were also evaluated. RESULTS: Most patients (67 of 70) completed all 5 PK profiles. The 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the MR tacrolimus vs Prograf comparison at steady state (days 14 and 21 vs days 1 and 7) were 90.7 and 99.4 for AUC0-24 and 82.7 and 91.9 for Cmin. MR tacrolimus was well tolerated with a safety profile comparable to that of Prograf. AUC0-24 was highly correlated to Cmin for Prograf (day 1, r = 0.80; day 7, r = 0.84) and MR tacrolimus (day 14, r = 0.92; day 21, r = 0.86). Renal function remained stable after conversion to MR tacrolimus. CONCLUSION: The steady state PK of MR tacrolimus are equivalent to Prograf after a milligram-for-milligram conversion in stable kidney transplant recipients. The results provide evidence to support a safe 1:1 conversion from Prograf twice a day to MR tacrolimus.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Steroids and living liver donation increase tacrolimus blood levels in living donor liver transplantation.

The aim of this study was to determine the tacrolimus blood levels in recipients of living donor liver transplants (LDLT) compared with recipients who undergo whole cadaveric liver grafts and to correlate the tacrolimus trough levels with the 12-hour area under the concentration (AUC) curve. From June 2002 to June 2003, the 10 LDLT were prospectively compared with 11 cadaveric transplants. The main immunosuppression was tacrolimus plus steroids. Intraoperative methylprednisolone was administered to all cadaveric organ recipients and only 6 of the 10 LDLT. Median tacrolimus trough levels at day 10 were 14.1 ng/mL for the LDLT group and 9.1 ng/mL for the CLT group (P = NS). The median tacrolimus AUC at day 10 were 185.2 ngxh/mL and 148.1 ngxh/mL for the LDLT group and the cadaveric group, respectively (P = NS). Median tacrolimus trough levels at day 2 were 24.3 ng/mL versus 9.9 ng/mL in the LDLT recipients with and without steroids, respectively (P < .05). Also, median tacrolimus AUC at day 2 were 239 ngxh/mL and 179.7 ngxh/mL when we compared LDLT recipients with and without steroids (P = NS). A significant correlation was observed between tacrolimus trough levels and AUC in the LDLT group (C.C. = 0.936; P < .0001). In conclusion, LDLT recipients display higher tacrolimus blood levels in comparison with cadaveric liver recipients, with a good correlation between tacrolimus trough levels and AUC. Intraoperative steroid administration induces higher tacrolimus levels in LDLT recipients.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

PubMed2006

Antiinflammatory effects of Tacrolimus in a mouse model of pleurisy.

INTRODUCTION: Tacrolimus is an antibiotic macrolide with immunosuppressant properties isolated from Streptomyces tsukubaensis. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated whether the acute and systemic administration of Tacrolimus significantly interfered in leukocyte migration, exudation, myeloperoxidase and adenosine-deaminase and nitric oxide levels, as well as Interleukin-1 (IL-1beta) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) levels in a mouse model of pleurisy in comparison to those obtained with dexamethasone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pleurisy was induced by carrageenan (Cg, 1%), bradykinin (BK, 10 nmol), histamine (HIS, 1 micromol) or substance P (PS, 20 nmol) administered by intrapleural route (ipl.) and the inflammatory parameters (cell migration and exudation) were analyzed 4 h after. In the model of pleurisy induced by carrageenan, other markers in the pleural fluid, such as cytokines (TNFalpha and Il-1beta), nitrite/nitrate (NOx), myeloperoxidase (MPO) and adenosine-deaminase (ADA) levels, were also studied. Dexamethaseone (0.5 mg/kg, i.p., 0.5 h before) was also analyzed in all protocols. RESULTS: In the pleurisy induced by carrageenan, Tacrolimus (1 mg/kg, i.p.) and dexamethasone (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) administered 0.5 h before caused a significant decrease in leukocytes, neutrophils and exudation (P < 0.01). Under the same conditions, Tacrolimus and dexamethasone did not modify the blood's white or red cells (P > 0.05). Tacrolimus showed a long lasting antiinflammatory effect, inhibiting leukocytes and neutrophils for up to 24 h (P < 0.01), whereas the inhibition of exudation was less marked (up to 2 h) (P < 0.01). These drugs caused a marked reduction in MPO activity, as well as IL-1beta and TNFalpha levels (P < 0.01), but only Tacrolimus inhibited ADA activity (P < 0.01). On the other hand, dexamethasone, but not Tacrolimus, inhibited NOx levels (P < 0.01). In the same conditions, Tacrolimus significantly inhibited cell migration induced by either bradykinin, histamine or substance P (P < 0.05). In a similar manner, dexamethasone inhibited leukocyte influx induced by bradykinin and histamine (P < 0.05). Regarding exudation effects, dexamethasone markedly inhibited this parameter induced by BK, HIS or SP, whereas Tacrolimus only inhibited exudation caused by HIS (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present work indicate that Tacrolimus showed important antiinflammatory properties against pleurisy in mice that are different from those caused by dexamethasone. The inhibition of proinflammatory cytokine (TNFalpha, IL-1beta), enzyme (myeloperoxidase, adenosine-deaminase) and mediator (bradykinin, histamine, substance P) release and/or action appears to account for Tacrolimus's actions.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

PubMed2001

Clotrimazole increases tacrolimus blood levels: a drug interaction in kidney transplant patients.

In order to substantiate a previous case report of a drug interaction between tacrolimus and clotrimazole, we randomly assigned tacrolimus-treated renal allograft recipients to therapy with either clotrimazole or nystatin for oral thrush prophylaxis immediately following transplantation. Patients receiving other agents known to interact with cytochrome P450 were excluded from the study. The clotrimazole group consisted of 17 patients and the nystatin group, which served as the control group, consisted of 18 patients. An oral loading dose (approximately 0.3 mg/kg) of tacrolimus was given pre-operatively. Post-transplant, tacrolimus (approximately 0.15 mg/kg) was orally administered twice daily. Clotrimazole therapy consisted of a 10-mg troche administered three times daily. Nystatin therapy consisted of the oral suspension (5 mL) administered as a 'swish and swallow' four times daily. We evaluated tacrolimus trough blood levels and tacrolimus doses on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 following transplantation. On post-transplant day 1, mean tacrolimus trough levels did not differ between clotrimazole- and nystatin-treated patients. Mean tacrolimus blood trough levels were significantly higher in clotrimazole-treated patients on days 3, 5, and 7 post-transplant, 42+/-14, 53+/-7, and 33+/-17 ng/mL, respectively, compared to 15+/-8, 15+/-7, and 14+/-6 ng/mL in nystatin-treated patients (p<0.05). The mean tacrolimus dose was significantly lower in the clotrimazole group by day 7 post-transplant (p<0.05). We conclude that clotrimazole therapy may cause a significant rise in tacrolimus trough blood levels. Recognition of this potential drug interaction is essential to minimize tacrolimus-associated toxicities in the early post-transplant period.

Adult↗