[Left-atrial function in circulatory insufficiency].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the effect of clinical factors on recovery of atrial function after cardioversion for atrial fibrillation. BACKGROUND: Lack of effective mechanical atrial function (EMAF) after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation predisposes to thromboembolic complications and delays improvement in functional capacity. METHODS: Fifty-two patients underwent cardioversion (group I, electrical cardioversion, n = 40; group II, pharmacologic or spontaneous cardioversion, n = 12) for atrial fibrillation. Serial transmitral inflow Doppler variables were recorded after cardioversion until EMAF (atrial filling velocity > 0.50 m/s) was seen. Clinical variables (age, duration of atrial fibrillation, left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial diameter, underlying cardiovascular disease, antiarrhythmic drug therapy and mode of cardioversion) were tested for an association with the outcomes of recovery of atrial function by day 3 and day 7. RESULTS: Effective mechanical atrial function recovered in 68% of patients by day 3 and in 76% by day 7 after cardioversion. The mode of cardioversion was significantly associated with recovery of atrial function by day 3 in bivariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratio 0.12, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 1.0, for electrical cardioversion). None of the variables had an association with recovery of atrial function by day 7. Group I patients took a longer time to recover atrial function than group II patients (p = 0.012). In addition, group I patients had a significantly lower peak atrial filling velocity (mean [+/-SD] 0.39 +/- 0.19 m/s vs. 0.56 +/- 0.16 m/s) and a higher early filling to atrial filling velocity ratio (2.5 +/- 1.2 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.5) after cardioversion. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of patients recover EMAF within 1 week after cardioversion. Patients who undergo electrical cardioversion display a greater degree and a longer duration of mechanical atrial dysfunction than those who convert pharmacologically or spontaneously.
Although several flow patterns in the left atrial appendage have been described, mechanical determinants of its function have not been elucidated in human beings. We attempted to investigate changes in left atrial appendage function after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and examine the potential relation between appendage function and left atrial mechanical function. Twenty patients without mitral valvular disease underwent transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography at 24 hours and 1 week after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Left atrial appendage function was assessed by the pulsed Doppler measurements of left atrial appendage emptying and filling velocities corresponding to early and late ventricular diastole, respectively. Left atrial mechanical function was evaluated by the transmitral A-wave velocity, percent atrial contribution of the total left ventricular filling (percent atrial filling), and the pulmonary venous A-wave velocity. Left ventricular function was also estimated with conventional M-mode echocardiography. The late appendage emptying and filling velocities markedly increased during 1 week after cardioversion (p < 0.0001, respectively). This finding was associated with an increase in left atrial mechanical function. Changes in the late emptying and filling velocities significantly correlated with changes in the transmitral A-wave velocity (r = 0.59, p < 0.01), percent atrial filling (r = 0.61, p < 0.005), and the pulmonary venous A-wave velocity (r = 0.56, p < 0.05). In contrast, little change was observed in the early emptying and filling velocities. There was no relation between the indexes of left ventricular function and those of appendage function. In conclusion, unless there was an alteration of the loading conditions, left atrial appendage function improved over several days after cardioversion, and its function was related to left atrial mechanical function.
Seventy-eight patients with chronic nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation were studied by transesophageal echocardiography with regard to the left atrial appendage function and its relation to the coarseness of atrial fibrillation on electrocardiogram. These 78 patients (52 men and 26 women; mean age, 66 +/- 10 years; range, 40 to 94 years) were classified into two groups according to the presence of coarse (group 1, n = 46; those with the greatest amplitude of fibrillatory wave in lead V1 > or = 1 mm) or fine (group 2, n = 32; those without the coarse fibrillatory wave in lead V1) atrial fibrillation on a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram within 1 month of echocardiographic studies. There were no significant differences in age, sex, mean duration of atrial fibrillation, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, left ventricular end-systolic dimension, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left atrial dimension between the two groups. In group 1, however, the left atrial appendage ejection fraction (24.4 +/- 14.2% vs 32.6 +/- 14.8%; p < 0.05) and the peak emptying velocity (21.7 +/- 12.6 cm/s vs 30.4 +/- 14.3 cm/s; p < 0.01) were lower than those in group 2. There were higher incidences of left atrial appendage spontaneous echo contrast (26/46 vs 7/32; p < 0.005) and thrombus (8/46 vs 0/32; p < 0.05) in group 1 patients. The coarse atrial fibrillation revealed a sensitivity of 80.0%, a specificity of 58.1%, a positive predictive value of 60.9%, and a negative predictive value of 78.1% for the presence of left atrial appendage spontaneous echo contrast and/or thrombus formation. In conclusion, in patients with coarse nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation, the left atrial appendage function is usually poor and the incidence of spontaneous echo contrast and thrombus formation appears to be higher in these patients.
Previous methods used to assess atrial baffle function after correction of transposition of the great arteries have included precordial echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. To evaluate whether single plane transesophageal echocardiography might provide additional information, its findings were correlated with information derived from both precordial echocardiography and cardiac catheterization in 15 patients (14 Mustard procedures, 1 Senning procedure) aged 4.2 to 33 years (mean 16.3). Precordial ultrasound with combined imaging, color flow mapping and pulsed Doppler ultrasound visualized the supramitral portion of the common systemic venous atrium in every case but could identify only superior limb obstruction in three of six patients, mid-baffle obstruction in zero of two and inferior limb obstruction in zero of two patients. Transesophageal studies with use of the same range of ultrasound methods demonstrated superior limb obstruction (severe in four, mild in two) in six of six patients, mid-baffle obstruction in two of two and inferior limb obstruction in two of two patients. The entire pulmonary venous atrium was equally well interrogated by either ultrasound approach, with both identifying three cases (two mild, one moderate) of mid-pulmonary venous atrium obstruction. However, individual pulmonary vein velocity profiles could only be recorded by transesophageal pulsed Doppler ultrasound. Precordial studies identified baffle leaks (1 large, 2 small) in only three patients, whereas transesophageal studies identified 11 such baffle leaks (1 large, 10 small), which were multiple in two patients. It is concluded that transesophageal echocardiography provides a more detailed and accurate assessment of atrial baffle morphology and function than is provided by either precordial ultrasound or cardiac catheterization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
BACKGROUND: A high incidence of embolic phenomena is associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) and the left atrial appendage (LAA) is frequently the source of the emboli. Thrombus formation may be due to stasis within the fibrillating and inadequately emptying LAA. Because LAA emptying in AF may be the result of mechanical compression by the adjacent left ventricle, it is possible that left ventricular diastolic filling duration will importantly influence passive emptying of the LAA. We hypothesized that the magnitude of emptying of the LAA in AF is related to the duration of left ventricular diastolic filling which is determined by the ventricular response rate in AF. OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the relationship of ventricular response rate in AF to LAA emptying and to assess the influence of sinus rhythm and heart rate on LAA emptying immediately after direct current cardioversion to sinus rhythm. METHODS: To study this, we used transesophageal echocardiography to measure LAA ejection fraction ([LAAmax-LAAmin]/LAAmax x 100%) and evaluated its relationship to left ventricular response rate (VRR) in 26 patients with AF (mean age, 65 +/- 7 [1 SD] years). RESULTS: There was a strong inverse relationship between LAA ejection fraction and VRR in AF (r = -0.73; p < 0.001). LAA ejection fraction during AF was 26 +/- 10%, and immediately after successful cardioversion, it increased to 46 +/- 12% (p < 0.001). However, during sinus rhythm there was no relationship between LAA ejection fraction and VRR (r = 0.06; p = NS) in the subgroup of patients who were successfully converted to sinus rhythm. There were poor relationships between LAA ejection fraction and peak transmitral flow velocity (r = -0.41; p = NS) or pulmonary venous flow velocity (r = -0.03; p = NS) in AF. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the magnitude of LAA emptying in AF is strongly and inversely influenced by ventricular rate. Direct current cardioversion to sinus rhythm is associated with an increase in the magnitude of LAA emptying that is not influenced by heart rate. The magnitude of LAA emptying may be an important factor in the formation of thromboemboli in AF. The extent to which controlling the VRR in chronic AF will prevent stasis and LAA thrombus formation remains to be determined.
The present study was designed to clarify how atrial appendectomy affects hemodynamics and secretory function of atrial natriuretic polypeptide in the failing heart. Eleven mongrel dogs were prepared for the experimental model of high-output heart failure by creation of arteriovenous fistulas between femoral arteries and veins. Two months after the first operation, effects of bilateral atrial appendectomies on basal and pacing-induced secretions of atrial natriuretic polypeptide were investigated in five dogs with simultaneous measurement of various hemodynamic indices. In the remaining six dogs, used as a control group, pacing-induced secretion of atrial natriuretic polypeptide was examined in the same way as in the appendectomy group. After excision of the atrial appendages, neither systolic blood pressure nor either atrial pressure changed, but plasma atrial natriuretic polypeptide level was decreased (292 +/- 54 to 188 +/- 47 pg/ml, p less than 0.01) and cardiac output fell (3.7 +/- 0.9 to 3.0 +/- 0.8 L/min, p less than 0.01). During pacing-induced tachycardia, the peak level of plasma atrial natriuretic polypeptide was lower in the appendectomy group than in the control groups (593 +/- 213 versus 1170 +/- 324 pg/ml, p less than 0.05), despite similar left atrial pressures in the two groups. The excised appendages contained approximately 30% of the total amount of atrial natriuretic polypeptide. These results demonstrate that atrial appendectomy decreases secretory function of atrial natriuretic polypeptide and reduces cardiac output in dogs with experimental high-output heart failure.
Left atrial appendage (LAA) flow velocities prior to electrical cardioversion were recorded using transesophageal pulsed Doppler echocardiography to predict initially successful cardioversion of isolated atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients with AF were placed into either a success group (19 patients) in which sinus rhythm was maintained for at least 2 days or a failure group (12 patients). The duration of AF was shorter in the success group. The maximum left atrial diameter was the same for the two groups. The maximum LAA area was smaller in the success group. The maximum forward and backward LAA velocities were greater in the success group, as were the mean forward and backward LAA velocities. In the patients with mean LAA flow velocities greater than 19 cm/sec, the success of cardioversion could be predicted with high sensitivity (80%) and specificity (88%). We conclude that the duration of AF, the maximum LAA area, and LAA flow velocities prior to cardioversion predict the initial recovery of sinus rhythm for isolated AF.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether echocardiographic markers thromboembolic risk differ between patients with pure atrial flutter and patients with atrial flutter and intermittent atrial fibrillation. DESIGN: Patients with atrial flutter were followed up prospectively for 12 months to identify intermittent atrial fibrillation. After the follow up period, transthoracic and multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography were performed to assess left atrial chamber and appendage size, peak emptying velocities, and emptying fraction of the left atrial appendage. The presence of spontaneous echo contrast was also determined. SETTING: Tertiary cardiac care centre. PATIENTS: 20 consecutive patients with atrial flutter; 11 healthy subjects in sinus rhythm served as controls. RESULTS: Intermittent atrial fibrillation was documented in 11 patients by Holter monitoring or surface ECG; atrial fibrillation was not found in the other nine patients. Compared with the patients with pure atrial flutter, patients with atrial flutter and intermittent atrial fibrillation had larger left atrial chamber (mean (SD) 4.5 (0.6) v 3.8 (0.5) cm; 95% confidence interval 0.2 to 1.2; P = 0.01) and appendage areas (6.7 (2.2) v 4.8 (4.9) cm; 95% CI 0.4 to 3.5; P = 0.02), lower left atrial appendage emptying fractions (33 (11)% v 52 (11)%; 95% CI 8 to 29; P = 0.008), and also lower left atrial appendage emptying velocities (0.44 (0.21) v 0.79 (0.27) m/s; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.56; P = 0.005). In addition, a higher incidence of spontaneous echo contrast (11% v 36%) was observed in patients with atrial flutter and intermittent atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial appendage function is depressed and spontaneous echo contrast more frequent in patients with atrial flutter and intermittent atrial fibrillation, as opposed to patients with pure atrial flutter. These data support the concept that patients with atrial flutter and intermittent atrial fibrillation have an increased risk of thromboembolic events and should therefore receive adequate anticoagulant treatment.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated atrial transport function after the Maze procedure in long-term follow-up and compared left and right atrial function in Maze patients with that of healthy age-matched controls using echo Doppler techniques. BACKGROUND: The Maze procedure is designed to eliminate atrial fibrillation, restore normal sinus rhythm, and preserve atrial contraction. Initial data indicate that atrial transport function is restored in most patients undergoing the Maze procedure. The long-term echo Doppler evaluation of patients after the Maze procedure has not been well described. METHODS: We performed pulsed-wave Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiographic studies on 31 patients (24 men, mean age 53.8 years) who underwent the Maze procedure and who had a follow-up study greater than 3 months (mean 16.5 months) after the procedure. Measurements included peak left ventricular and right ventricular inflow A-wave velocity, maximum and minimum left atrial and right atrial areas, and fractional area change of the left and right atria. Results were compared with those obtained from 15 age-matched control subjects (11 men, mean age 53.8 years). RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (71%) had left atrial function shown by the presence of left ventricular inflow A-wave, and 25 patients (81%) had right atrial function shown by the presence of right ventricular inflow A-wave on Doppler echocardiography. The left ventricular inflow A-wave velocity was significantly lower than that of age-matched controls (37.5 +/- 15.5 versus 61.0 +/- 13.9 cm/sec; p < 0.001), whereas the right ventricular inflow A-wave velocity did not significantly differ between patients and control subjects (35.4 +/- 9.9 versus 35.3 +/- 4.9 cm/sec; p = Not significant). Although left and right atrial areas decreased significantly after the procedure, there was no significant change in the fractional area change which was smaller in Maze patients than control individuals. CONCLUSIONS: (1) In long-term follow-up of 16.5 months after the Maze procedure, left atrial systolic function was preserved in 71% of our patients and right atrial systolic function was preserved in 81%; (2) the left ventricular inflow peak A-wave velocity after Maze is considerably less than that in age-matched controls; and (3) left and right atrial sizes decreased after the procedure with no change in the fractional area change. These findings suggest that the Maze procedure is effective in restoring atrial function in the majority of patients; however, restored function is less than in control individuals.
The return of atrial mechanical function and its relationship to embolic events following cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias is controversial. Fourteen patients with atrial arrhythmias were evaluated with pulsed Doppler echocardiography before and after direct current (DC) cardioversion. The atrial filling fraction increased significantly: 1.14 +/- 4.3% at baseline versus 14.9 +/- 13.3%, 13.4 +/- 11.4%, and 21.9 +/- 13.5% at 5 minutes, 30 minutes, and 24 hours, respectively, following cardioversion. Absent atrial mechanical activity was noted in four patients immediately after cardioversion. Mechanical activity resumed by 30 minutes in one patient and at 24 hours in two others. Those with delayed atrial function had lower stroke volumes and atrial filling fractions following cardioversion. An embolic event occurred in one patient who had immediate return of atrial mechanical activity. This patient also had the largest atrial filling fraction of any patient at 24 hours (41%). These data suggest that the degree of atrial mechanical activity following cardioversion is variable and that embolic episodes are not necessarily related to delayed return of atrial mechanical activity following cardioversion.
The atrial contribution to ventricular stroke volume was evaluated in 50 patients with coronary artery disease and found to be related to left ventricular function. All patients underwent complete hemodynamic and angiographic studies. Angiographic volume studies were utilized to determine atrial contribution to the stroke volume, end-systolic volume and ejection fraction. In 11 patients without heart disease, atrial contribution to stroke volume was (mean value +/- standard deviation) 9.3 +/- 6 ml/m2 compared with 13.5 +/- 6 ml/m2 in the patients with coronary disease (probability [p] less than 0.05). The percent of atrial contribution to stroke volume was 20 +/- 7 and 33 +/- 11%, respectively, in normal subjects and patients with coronary disease (p less than 0.05). The combination of congestive heart failure and cardiomegaly was the only clinical aspect associated with a significantly higher (p less than 0.05) atrial contribution to stroke volume than that in the remaining patients with coronary disease (46 versus 31%). Relating the atrial contribution to stroke volume to the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, stroke volume, end-systolic volume and ejection fraction revealed correlation coefficients of 0.30, -0.44, 0.56 and -0.64, respectively. No patient with a normal ejection fraction (greater than 0.50) had an atrial contribution greater than 40% of stroke volume. The ratio of peak left ventricular systolic pressure/end-systolic volume (mm Hg/ml) was 2.7 +/- 1.5 in patients (n = 14) with an atrial contribution greater than 40% of stroke volume compared with 5.3 +/- 3.4 in patients having an atrial contribution of 40% or less (p less than 0.01). These findings indicate that atrial contribution to stroke volume is inversely related to left ventricular function.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate left atrial appendage size, function and thrombus prevalence in patients with atrial "fibrillation-flutter." BACKGROUND: Thrombus formation and peripheral embolization in atrial fibrillation are related to left atrial appendage dysfunction. Embolization occurs less frequently in atrial flutter. It is not known whether the atrial appendage in fibrillation-flutter, which has an intermediate appearance on the surface electrocardiogram (ECG), has distinct characteristics that could affect thrombus formation. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias underwent transesophageal echocardiographic examination of the left atrial appendage. Appendage area, peak emptying velocity and the presence of thrombus and spontaneous echo contrast were determined. The results for 14 patients with fibrillation-flutter (based on ECG fibrillatory wave characteristics) were compared with those for 30 patients with atrial fibrillation and 17 patients with atrial flutter. RESULTS: Both fibrillation-flutter and atrial fibrillation were associated with chaotic appendage flow patterns with similarly low peak emptying velocities (18 +/- 8 and 17 +/- 10 cm/s, mean +/- 1 SD, respectively). Atrial flutter was associated with a regular pattern of appendage contraction and a significantly higher peak emptying velocity (42 +/- 18 cm/s, p < 0.0001). Mean appendage area was similar for fibrillation-flutter and fibrillation (6.3 +/- 2.2 and 6.7 +/- 2.1 cm2, respectively) but was significantly smaller for atrial flutter (5.3 +/- 1.4 cm2, p < 0.05). The prevalence of left atrial appendage thrombus was similar for fibrillation-flutter and atrial fibrillation (40% and 29%, respectively), whereas no patient with atrial flutter had a thrombus (p < 0.05). Similarly, the presence of spontaneous echo contrast was higher for fibrillation-flutter (50%) and atrial fibrillation (40%) than for atrial flutter (6%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial appendage size and function in atrial fibrillation-flutter are indistinguishable from those of typical atrial fibrillation, and the frequency of thrombus and spontaneous echo contrast is similarly high. This is in contrast to atrial flutter, which is characterized by a smaller, more contractile left atrial appendage and a lower frequency of thrombus and spontaneous echo contrast.
We measured left atrial function during sinus rhythm before and after ventricular tachycardia was induced in an electrophysiology laboratory, using peak transmitral A-wave velocity from pulsed-Doppler transthoracic echocardiography as a marker of left atrial mechanical function. The results of this prospective study do not support the hypothesis that a transthoracic shock of mild to moderate energy diminishes atrial mechanical function.
Atrial and ventricular pacemaker function was studied in 20 patients with idiopathic chronic complete heart block using the rate response to an intravenous bolus dose of isoprenaline (5 mug/70 kg bodyweight). Pacemaker responses were compared with those of 16 normal control subjects. None of the patients was having syncopal attacks at the time of admission and they were therefore selected in that none required immediate pacing. Ten of the patients had His bundle electrograms; all were shown to have a pre-His type of atrioventricular block. Two major groups emerge from the responses to isoprenaline. (a) High risk group: 11 of the 14 patients with reduced ventricular pacemaker responses had frequent syncopal attacks; 8 of the patients with Adams-Stokes syncope had a bundle-branch block pattern, while 3 had a narrow QRS. These patients require pacing. (b) Low risk group: a low risk asymptomatic group (5 patients) was identified with atrial and ventricular responses to isoprenaline within normal range. One of these patients had a bundle-branch block pattern, while 4 had a narrow QRS. These patients might be managed without pacing. The atrial response to isoprenaline was reduced in 12 of the 20 cases, 10 of whom also had reduced ventricular responses. All 9 patients with bundle-branch block had reduced ventricular responses, while 7 had reduced atrial responses. This evidence indicates that cardiac conducting tissue pathophysiology is widespread in complete heart bolck. The present work suggests that consideration of the ventricular pacemaker function is important in assessing liability to syncope in complete heart block. While patients with Adams-Stokes attacks require pacing it is suggested that all asymptomatic patients with complete heart block and those with minor symptoms are assessed using studies of both ventricular pacemaker function and site. A low risk group not requiring a pacemaker may emerge after sufficient follow-up assessment.
The authors studied the effects of transoesophageal atrial pacing on Doppler parameters derived from flow in the left ventricular out flow tract (maximal velocity (V max), velocity-time integral (VTI), mean acceleration of aortic flow (Acc), acceleration force (AF) of the left ventricle). These parameters were recorded in patients with normal left ventricular wall motion at rest, with and without coronary disease. Eight patients had angiographically normal coronary arteries (Group 1) and 21 had coronary disease (Group 2) including 10 with an isolated stenosis of the left anterior descending artery (Group 2a) and 11 with multivessel disease (Group 2b). The heart rate was increased by increments of 20 beats per minute from 90 to 130 each minute. In coronary patients, atrial pacing resulted in a fall in V max from 0.99 +/- 0.15 to 0.90 +/- 0.12 m/s, p < 0.0005 and in AF from 23.1 +/- 6.3 to 19.6 +/- 4.8 Kdynes, p < 0.0005, whereas the Acc remained stable (13.51 +/- 3.27 and 13.53 +/- 2.47 m/s/s, NS). Conversely, V max (1.04 +/- 0.11 and 1.04 +/- 0.11, NS) and AF (25.2 +/- 5.7 and 26.3 +/- 6.7, NS) were unchanged in normal controls and the Acc improved from 13.87 +/- 3.61 to 17.04 +/- 3.49, (p < 0.05). The VTI fell significantly in both groups. The percentage variations of V max, Acc and AF were significantly different in coronary patients compared with normal controls. There were no differences between the two coronary subgroups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the time course of the recovery of atrial mechanical function after pharmacological cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 21 patients (12 male, 9 female, aged 37-77 years) with chronic atrial fibrillation (< 6 months) were followed up by serial transmitral pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Echocardiographic studies were performed within the first 24 hours and on day 8, 15, and 30 after cardioversion. RESULTS: There was a significant increase (mean (SD)) in the peak A-wave velocity (from 0.35 (0.10) on day 1 to 0.50 (1.73) on day 8, and thereafter a gradual increase to 0.61 (0.14) m/s on day 30). Similarly, integrated late atrial velocities increased from 4.50 (1.46) on day 1 to 5.61 (1.73) on day 8 and 5.97 (1.47) cm/s2 on day 30. The atrial contribution to total transmitral flow increased significantly from 26 (7)% immediately after conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm to 34 (7)% on day 30, indicating the haemodynamic benefit of the restoration of sinus rhythm. Left atrial diameter decreased but not significantly, from 4.11 (0.37) to 3.98 (0.34) cm (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that restoration of atrial mechanical function after pharmacological cardioversion in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation is slow and gradual, as it is after electrical DC restoration of sinus rhythm. This time course may have important implications for determining how long treatment with anticoagulants and antiarrhythmic agents needs to continue in individual patients. It will also influence the clinical assessment of the haemodynamic benefit of restoring sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.