PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “cervical screening”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

How can we develop a cost-effective quality cervical screening programme?

This article discusses the evidence base underpinning the United Kingdom cervical screening programme and proposes that there is now sufficient evidence to suggest that too many women are screened too frequently. The financial savings generated from increasing the screening interval to five years and restricting routine screening to women aged 25 to 50 years may, we suggest, be better spent on improving the quality of the cervical screening programme. Re-awakening this debate must not however deflect energy and effort from recruiting women who have never been screened or further developing quality control systems. Any debate must also fully engage women of all ages as the key stakeholders in the decision-making process.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Health authority cervical screening recall policies and time since last smear: a retrospective cohort analysis in the north west England.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of health authority cervical screening programmes upon the the actual screening interval for women attending as a result of routine recall and to assess the impact of general practice recall policies on attendance for smears. SETTING: Nine health authorities constituting the Lancashire and Greater Manchester zones of the North West region on the National Health Service. METHODS: Information was obtained on the invitation and recall policies of each health authority. A retrospective analysis of information held on cervical screening databases ("Exeter" computer systems was performed. The proportions of smears, classified by a screening interval of "unscheduled", "on-time" or "overdue", in the different health authority recall programmes were compared. General practices in one health authority (operating five-yearly recall) were contacted to determine their current practice screening policy. RESULTS: Women who were invited as part of a three-yearly recall programme were more likely to attend for smears at intervals of 3-5 years than those on a five-yearly recall programme (68% vs 47%). Those health authorities operating three-yearly recall that issued recall invitations to women more than four weeks before the date the smear was due had higher rates of "unscheduled" smears. In the one health authority (operating a five-yearly recall programme) in which we determined general practice screening policy, 62% of the general practitioners (GPs) were operating their own three-yearly recall policy; these GPs had a higher proportion of the women who attended for smears "on-time" (51%) than did those who relied on the health authority five-yearly recall procedure (44%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the cervical screening programme being a national programme, there is scope at a local level for considerable variation in the interpretation of national guidance. This variation effects the extent to which programmes comply with the requirement to screen all women at an interval of 3-5 years.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Benefit of cervical screening at different ages: evidence from the UK audit of screening histories.

While most experts agree that cervical screening is effective, there remains controversy over the most appropriate screening interval. Annual screening is common in North America. In England, some argue for 3-yearly screening while others believe 5-yearly screening is adequate, and the frequency varies from one part of the country to another. Screening histories of 1305 women aged 20-69 years, diagnosed with frankly invasive cervical cancer and 2532 age-matched controls were obtained from UK screening programme databases. Data were analysed in terms of time since last negative, and time since last screening smear. Five-yearly screening offers considerable protection (83%) against cancer at ages 55-69 years and even annual screening offers only modest additional protection (87%). Three-yearly screening offers additional protection (84%) over 5-yearly screening (73%) for cancers at ages 40-54 years, but is almost as good as annual screening (88%). In women aged 20-39 years, even annual screening is not as effective (76%) as 3-yearly screening in older women, and 3 years after screening cancer rates return to those in unscreened women. This calls into question the policy of having a uniform screening interval from age 20 to 64 years and stresses the value of screening in middle-aged women. British Journal of Cancer (2003) 89, 88-93. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600974 www.bjcancer.com

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Cervical screening: the optimum visit plan for contacting users and non-users in Scotland.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the numbers of visits required to obtain interviews with users and non-users of cervical screening, and to determine the workload involved to enable an optimum visit plan to be developed. DESIGN: Case-control study of users and non-users of cervical screening using a flexible visit plan that involved up to eight attempts at contact. Visits were made in mornings, afternoons, and evenings, the visit pattern being determined by information gained from local sources. PATIENTS: Altogether 660 non-users of cervical screening (cases), aged 20-64 and registered with 23 randomly selected general practitioners (GPs), were identified from the Tayside computerised register of cervical smears. These women were selected from the computerised lists of 18 GPs in Dundee and five in Perth. A total of 417 women recorded as having a smear within the previous three years (controls), matched by age and GP, were also identified from the computerised register. RESULTS: Altogether 1834 attempts were made to contact the cases, of whom 339 were interviewed, giving a workload of 18 interviews per 100 attempts. For the controls 1359 attempts were made at contact to yield 339 interviews, a workload of 25 interviews per 100 attempts. Refusals (19%) and incorrect addresses (23%) were the two major reasons for failing to achieve interview. Only for four (0.6%) of the cases and one (0.2%) of the controls was no information gained. The proportion of attempts which led to interview remained constant with increasing numbers of call-backs (up to six for the cases and eight for the controls). CONCLUSIONS: A flexible approach to visit scheduling that takes account of local knowledge can lead to interviews with 66% of non-users of health screening, when incorrect addresses are removed. It is preferable to plan for many (up to six) visits to achieve interview. This will minimise non-response bias without increasing the workload per successful interview.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Self-reported cervical screening practices and beliefs of women from urban, rural and remote regions.

This survey aimed to explore women's perceptions of a number of issues relating to the availability and utilisation of cervical cancer screening services in the rural, remote and urban regions of New South Wales (NSW) Australia. The survey involved urban, rural and remote regions of NSW determined by the definition of the Department of Community Services and Health. This was a cross-sectional telephone survey. Of the 339 eligible urban households, 265 (78%) completed interviews; of the 286 eligible rural households, 238 (83%) completed interviews; of the 285 eligible remote households, 230 (81%) completed interviews. Telephone contact was made with randomly selected households in each region. Women in the households were asked to complete a computer-assisted telephone interview. The survey addressed a number of issues relating to cervical screening: cervical cancer risk status; provider of Pap smear service; distance travelled to have a Pap smear; perceived barriers and facilitators to cervical screening. There was no statistically significant difference in the proportions of women from urban (74%), rural (76%), and remote (71%) regions who reported having a Pap smear in the 2 years preceding the survey. General practitioners provided the majority (more than 70%) of tests irrespective of region. Compared with women from urban areas, women from rural and remote areas were almost twice as likely to have had their last Pap smear from a male general practitioner. A greater proportion of women from remote regions had to travel for 60 minutes or more to access providers of Pap smear services. Few differences in the top three reported barriers to, and facilitators for screening were evident between regions and between those women who had and had not been adequately screened. Issues of distance, isolation and access to alternative service providers are a concern to women in rural and remote regions and should be considered by those involved in the implementation of cervical cancer screening services.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2000

Breast and cervical screening for women in the United Kingdom.

Two fully fledged National Health Service cancer screening programmes are currently available in the United Kingdom: breast and cervical screening for women. Breast screening was introduced for women aged 50 years and older, following the publication of the Forrest report in 1986. It has recently been calculated that the breast screening programme in England and Wales has been responsible for around a third of the fall in the death rate from breast cancer among women aged between 55 and 69 years. The cervical screening programme did not have such a clear start and began rather haphazardly in the 1960s. The programme now prevents around 2000 cases of cervical cancer and saves around 1300 lives each year. The duty of the health professional is no longer seen as being to persuade a woman to accept screening, but rather to provide her with accurate information about screening and to assist her in understanding it.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

A review of cervical cancer and cervical screening: implications for nursing practice.

In this paper we review epidemiological and other research evidence on cervical cancer and cervical screening. We outline recent research evidence implicating sexually transmitted human papillomavirus as one of the causes of cervical cancer, but stress the uncertainty surrounding the causes and natural history of the disease. We go on to discuss evidence on risk factors associated with increased incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer, including age, sexual behaviour, smoking, socioeconomic status and prolonged use of oral contraceptives. Cervical screening has reduced mortality in some countries, and we outline the necessary features of a successful, effective screening programme before going on to describe why screening failed in Britain, at least until the late 1980s. Current screening policy is designed to remedy this, and we discuss its implications, and those of previous research, for nursing practice.

Female↗
PubMed1995

Inpatient cervical screening: a survey of patient acceptability.

Offering Pap tests to hospital inpatients could increase cervical screening rates. A survey to examine the acceptability of this concept was conducted with female inpatients in a rural public hospital. A large majority reported that they would find hospital Pap tests acceptable. Acceptability was not related to Pap test status, attitudes, or knowledge of cervical cancer. This strategy may provide access to cervical screening for underscreened groups.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

The impact of a television soap opera on the NHS Cervical Screening Programme in the North West of England.

BACKGROUND: Mass media interventions can influence health care utilization but the effect of televised fictional accounts of illness upon national screening programmes is unknown. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of a Coronation Street story line, in which one of the characters died from cervical cancer, on the National Health Service (NHS) Cervical Screening Programme. METHODS: The study involved a retrospective analysis of information held on cervical screening databases ('Exeter' computer systems) of the nine Health Authorities constituting the Lancashire and Greater Manchester zones of the North West Region of the NHS. The number of cervical smears performed in the community, in women over 25 years of age, whose previous smear was normal and who were on routine recall, during a 6 month period that included the story line, was compared with those taken over the same period in the previous year. The proportions of smears classified by a screening interval of 'unscheduled', 'on time', 'overdue' or 'no previous smear' were compared. RESULTS: The number of smears performed increased from 65,714 in 2000 to 79,712 in 2001, an increase of 13,998 (21.3 percent; 95 per cent confidence interval (CI) 21.0-21.6 per cent) in the 19 weeks after the story line. The increase in the number of smears occurred in all categories of screening interval, with the largest increase seen in those attending 'on-time' (26 per cent). CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated a large impact of a soap opera story line on the cervical screening programme although the benefit to health is not clear. Further research will determine the long-term effect of the story.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Raising awareness and providing free screening improves cervical cancer screening among economically disadvantaged Lebanese/Armenian women.

Women need to practice cervical screening regularly to reduce morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of an intervention program on knowledge, attitude, and practice of cervical screening in the population of Lebanese/Armenian women. The design was a cross-sectional, quasi-experimental posttest survey following a year long intervention program. The sample included 176 women, who were members of the Armenian Relief Cross in Lebanon. Interventions consisted of educational classes, media messages, and free screening. The instrument was a self-administered questionnaire. Knowledge of women with intervention was higher (p > .05) and practice rate increased between intervention and comparison groups. No difference in attitude was noted. The study was successful in raising awareness and increasing screening in the sample. It is recommended to continue helping women to overcome barriers for cervical screening.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Effects and sustainability of a cervical screening program in remote Aboriginal Australia.

We assessed the effects of an organised cervical screening program, using a population-based cervical cytology register, for Aboriginal women in the Fitzroy Valley, a remote part of the Kimberley region of Western Australia. Comparison of age-specific screening rates in the area during 1987-88, 1990-92 and 1993-94 showed that establishing the program in late 1989 was accompanied by dramatic increases in cervical screening rates, ranging from two- to over fourfold, with the largest increases in women aged 50 years and over. Following the departure of the coordinator in early 1993, screening rates decreased to between 76 per cent and 29 per cent of their 1990-92 levels, with the largest decreases occurring in the 40-49 and 60-69 years age groups. Rates were still above 1987-88 levels for most age groups. Of 545 women screened during 1991-92, 65 per cent had undergone a second Pap smear within the follow-up period of two to four years. Among women recommended for a repeat smear in two years, the probability of having a second smear was negatively associated with age (log-rank statistic = 35.58, 4 df, P < 0.0001). Follow-up of smears recommended for repeat in 12 months or earlier was less adequate in 1993-94 (46 per cent) than in 1991-92 (75 per cent). The program was successful in recruiting a large proportion of eligible women within a relatively short time, but coverage, especially of older women, was not sustained after a decline in the functioning of the recall system owing to staffing and organisational changes.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Synthesising research findings and practical experience to formulate principles in cervical screening.

Compared particularly with Scandinavian countries, the effects of cervical screening in the United Kingdom have been disappointing, both in terms of women screened and in relation to incidence and mortality. The underlying problem is the under-representation of women most at risk of cervical cancer in the screened population. In this paper we examine two possible hypotheses for such under-representation: one concerns the behavioural aspects of women's failure to attend and the second the effect of the organisation of current screening services on their attendance. We outline the features that an effective service would need to incorporate and propose principles for the development of a screening system designed to maximise the potential of the cervical smear test.

Behavior↗
PubMed1990

A study of the effect of introducing a restrictive cervical screening policy on laboratory workload and cervical cancer detection rates.

This study examines the effect of a change in screening policy on the detection rate of severe dyskaryosis. During 1987 a total of 423 cases of severe dyskaryosis were identified by the Avon Screening Programme. Eleven per cent of these abnormal smears were repeat smears taken without clinical indication within the recommended 5 year recall period (interval smears). In a comparable control group of negative smears 31% were interval smears. Twenty-five per cent of the dyskaryotic interval smears (3% of the total severely dyskaryotic smears) were taken within 3 years of the previous negative smear, compared with 50% of the control group. By discouraging opportunistic smears within 5 years of the previous smear, the laboratory workload could be reduced by 30%, or within 3 years of the previous smear by 15%. There is, however, a risk of 11% and 3% respectively of missing a significant lesion (severe dyskaryosis).

Cell Nucleus↗
PubMed1997

Cervical screening of Arabic-speaking women in Australian general practice.

OBJECTIVE: To determine recency and predictors of cervical screening among Arabic-speaking women in Sydney, Australia. METHOD: A consecutive sample of Arabic-speaking women, attending 20 Arabic-speaking general practitioners, was asked to complete a self administered health risk questionnaire available in Arabic or English which included three questions about cervical screening knowledge and behaviour. RESULTS: Of 756 eligible women, 526 (70%) returned completed questionnaires. Of these, 69 (13%) did not know what a cervical smear was. Sixteen per cent of overseas-born compared with 2% of Australian-born women at risk had not heard of a cervical smear. Women were defined as being at risk of cervical cancer if they had both been married and not had a hysterectomy. Of 318 women at risk for cervical cancer who knew what a cervical smear was, 66% had had a smear in the last two years, a further 7% were attending for one that day while 11% had not had a smear for at least two years, 9% had never had one and 7% did not answer/could not remember. Religion, age, and residence in Australia for more than 10 years were significant and independent predictors of screening after adjustment for other variables in simultaneous logistic regression model (P = 0.002, P = 0.002, and P = 0.040 respectively). Muslim women and older women were more likely to be underscreened, and women with more than 10 years' residence in Australia were more likely to have been screened in the last two years. Acculturation, smoking status, health status, duration of relationship with participating doctor, and chronic disease were not significant predictors of a recent smear. CONCLUSION: As only 73% of women at risk had been screened in the last two years, including women attending on the day and 9% had never been screened, Arabic-speaking women should be a priority for public campaigns, particularly Muslim and older women. Studies to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of reminders by ethnic general practitioners are recommended.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

[Computerized monitoring for integrated cervical screening. Rationale, methods and indicators of participation].

This paper presents a computerised system for the monitoring of integrated cervical screening, i.e. the integration of spontaneous Pap smear practice into organised screening. The general characteristics of the system are described, including background and rationale (integrated cervical screening in European countries, impact of integration on monitoring, decentralised organization of screening and levels of monitoring), general methods (definitions, sections, software description, and setting of application), and indicators of participation (distribution by time interval since previous Pap smear, distribution by screening sector--organised screening centres vs public and private clinical settings--, distribution by time interval between the last two Pap smears, and movement of women between the two screening sectors). Also, the paper reports the results of the application of these indicators in the general database of the Pathology Department of Imola Health District in northern Italy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2026

Behaviourally informed text message reminders to increase cervical screening attendance in people with severe mental illness: the OPTIMISE pilot randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the feasibility of both the delivery and evaluation of 'enhanced' (behaviourally informed) text message reminders containing links to existing co-designed resources supporting decision-making for people with severe mental illness (SMI) regarding attendance of cervical screening. DESIGN: A pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT). SETTING: 13 General Practice (GP) practices in London were recruited. PARTICIPANTS: GP practices identified people with SMI aged 24-64 years who were overdue cervical screening. Target sample size was 120 participants (60 per arm) based on existing guidance for pilot trials. INTERVENTION: In March 2025, participants were randomised (1:1) to receive either the enhanced (intervention) or the standard (control) SMS reminder. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: 18 weeks later, feasibility outcomes were collected (primary outcomes) and data analysis for a definitive RCT was rehearsed (secondary outcome). RESULTS: Of the 150 participants across 13 GP practices that were randomised (n=75 per arm), 132 (88%) texts delivered (intervention n=64/75 (85%), control n=68/75 (91%)). 10 practices (76.9%) provided follow-up data for 102 participants (intervention n=50, control n=52). Five participants (intervention n=4, control n=1) attended screening within the trial period. Participant survey response rate was low (9/132 (7%), intervention n=5, control n=4). Both SMS messages were low cost, with the intervention SMS a 50% higher cost to deliver (7.5p vs 5p per SMS). Primary feasibility measures of recruitment rate of GP practices (27%), retention of GP practices (77%) and participants (100%), SMS delivery (88%) and data completeness (64%) indicated viability, although survey response rate (7%) did not. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving adequate recruitment and retention, data completeness and comparable groups is viable with some amendments, although an alternative method is required to assess fidelity. Behaviourally informed SMS reminders are feasible to deliver to people with SMI, although it is uncertain if the extra resources are accessed and used. With changes to data collection, a definitive trial could be feasible. Given the low observed cervical screening attendance, additional intervention is needed for this group. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12558681.

Humans↗