SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “laparoscopy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

PubMed1991

Indications and general techniques for lasers in advanced operative laparoscopy.

Lasers are but one of the several energy delivery systems used by the operative laparoscopist in the performance of advanced operative laparoscopy. Safety is a key factor in the selection of a laser because the tissue damage produced by this instrument is absolutely predictable. The surgeon must be totally familiar with the chosen wavelength and its tissue reaction if this safety factor is to be realized. Other instruments complement the use of lasers in advanced operative laparoscopy, and without thorough knowledge of all available techniques and instruments, the operative laparoscopist will not achieve the full potential of this specialty. It is beyond the scope of this issue on gynecologic laser surgery to present all of the useful nonlaser techniques. Suffice it to say that we often use laser, loop ligature, sutures, hemoclips, bipolar electricity, hydrodissection, and endocoagulation during the course of a day in the operating room and sometimes during one case. As enthusiasm for advanced operative laparoscopy grows and endoscopic capability increases, more complicated and prolonged surgical feats are reported. Radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy have been performed by the laparoscopic route, and endoscopic management of ovarian tumors also has been reported. At this moment, these must be viewed as "show and tell" procedures unsupported by statistics to demonstrate any advantage (or disadvantage) when compared with conventional surgical methods. The time required of advanced operative laparoscopy for any given procedure is certainly an important factor. Prolonged operative and anesthesia time certainly can negate the supposed benefit of small incisions and minimally invasive surgery. What goes on inside the abdomen is certainly the most important part of advanced operative laparoscopy. Good surgeons must recognize their own limitations and the limitations of available technology. The operative laparoscopist must know when to quit and institute a laparotomy. In general, when the magnitude of the operative laparoscopy greatly increases the time required to perform the surgery or exceeds the capability of the surgeon, laparotomy is necessary. Patients should never be promised that an operation will be done by laparoscopy. In advanced operative laparoscopy, informed consent means that the patient has had a reasonable explanation of the method, its benefits and its dangers, and has also been told that laparotomy is always a possibility. In our large series, the laparotomy rate is about 3%. It is also wise not to promise the patient that advanced operative laparoscopy will be done by the laser.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Computer Terminals↗

PubMed1995

A prospective comparison of laparoscopy and imaging in the staging of esophagogastric cancer before surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To carry out a prospective comparison of laparoscopy and combined imaging (CT and ultrasound) in the preoperative staging of distal esophageal and gastric cancer in patients who were selected for surgery. METHODS: Patients with clinically overt metastases or a contraindication to major surgery were excluded. One hundred and forty-five patients underwent chest radiography, CT of mediastinum and abdomen, and ultrasonography of abdomen and laparoscopy. The primary diagnoses were adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric region in 110 cases, squamous cell carcinoma of the distal esophagus in 30 patients, and five miscellaneous. RESULTS: Thirty nine (27%) patients had metastatic disease outside the potential field of resection. Metastases were detected preoperatively by laparoscopy in 30 patients (sensitivity 77%) and by combined imaging in 15 (sensitivity 38%) (p < 0.01). Twenty four patients with adenocarcinoma had metastases to the peritoneal cavity, which were detected preoperatively by laparoscopy in 23 (sensitivity 96%) and by combined imaging in five (sensitivity 21%) (p < 0.01). Peritoneal metastases were not seen in patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Fifteen patients had hepatic metastases, which were detected preoperatively by laparoscopy in nine (sensitivity 60%) and by combined imaging in seven (sensitivity 47%). Laparoscopy was more sensitive than combined imaging in detecting metastases in patients with adenocarcinoma [laparoscopy 28, combined imaging 10 (p < 0.01)]. CONCLUSION: Addition of laparoscopy to the staging protocol prevented unbeneficial thoraco-abdominal exploration in 20 patients with adenocarcinoma. Thus, laparoscopy should be used in the assessment of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric region before performing excisional surgery.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

[Value of laparoscopy in ascites of undetermined origin].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy in the study of patients with ascites of unknown cause, and the frequency of laparoscopy use for that indication after the advent of ultrasonography and computed tomography. DESIGN: A retrospective study of 4.536 laparoscopies performed in 16 years, in two periods of 8 years, and the correlation with the pathologic diagnosis. PATIENTS: 137 patients in whom laparoscopy was indicated for the study of ascites of unknown cause. RESULTS: 63.5% of laparoscopies were performed over the first 8-year period, and 36.5% in the second (p = 0.0001), and for the study of ascites 2.6 and 3.8% respectively. Laparoscopy and biopsy were diagnostic in 98.5% of cases; 51% carcinomatosis, 17.5% liver cirrhosis, 11.7% hepatic neoplasm and others. Two of five cases of peritoneal tuberculosis were considered carcinomatosis at laparoscopy. There were no serious complications. CONCLUSIONS: The advent of new imaging method has reduced the use of laparoscopy, although it is still employed frequently for the study of ascites. Laparoscopy with biopsy when necessary has an excellent effectiveness and accuracy for the diagnosis of ascites of unknown cause.

Ascites↗

PubMed1997

Treating adnexal masses. Operative laparoscopy vs. laparotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare operative laparoscopy vs. laparotomy for the treatment of adnexal masses. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of all surgical cases who underwent operative laparoscopy or laparotomy for an adnexal mass during 1988-1995 at one multispecialty group practice. Preoperative screening for women over 45 included a CA-125 and ultrasound. If a malignant mass was encountered, it was immediately staged by laparotomy with the assistance of a surgical oncologist. During the study period 121 patients underwent ovarian cystectomy and 284 patients, oophorectomy. RESULTS: Laparoscopy was successfully completed in 118 of 127 (93%) oophorectomy and 71 of 72 (98%) of ovarian cystectomy patients. The incidence of malignant lesions at operative laparoscopy was 2%. The hospital stay for ovarian cystectomy was significantly shorter for laparoscopy (0.8 vs. 3.1 days). Hospital stay for oophorectomy was significantly shorter for laparoscopy (0.8 vs. 4.1 days). Ovarian cystectomy by laparotomy resulted in slightly more total complications than did laparoscopy (8% vs. 1%). Oophorectomy by laparotomy resulted in significantly more total complications than did oophorectomy by laparoscopy (29% vs. 3%). The mean total charge for laparoscopic oophorectomy was $5,873 versus $7,007 for laparotomy. The mean total charge for laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy was $4,507 vs. $5,541 for laparotomy. CONCLUSION: Treatment of adnexal masses by operative laparoscopy can be performed safely, with reduced morbidity and patient disability, and at a reduced cost. By having an oncologist backup in house, we have been able to convert most procedures to the laparoscopic approach.

Adnexal Diseases↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Laparoscopy for penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma: pitfalls and promises.

BACKGROUND: How should the stable patient with penetrating abdominal or lower chest trauma be evaluated? Evolving trends have recently included the use of diagnostic laparoscopy. In September 1995 we instituted a protocol of diagnostic laparoscopy to identify those patients who could safely avoid surgical intervention. DESIGN: Prospective case series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating injuries to the anterior abdomen and lower chest were prospectively evaluated by diagnostic laparoscopy, performed in the operating room under general anesthesia, and considered negative if no peritoneal violation or an isolated nonbleeding liver injury had occurred. If peritoneal violation, major organ injury or hematoma was noted, conversion to open celiotomy was undertaken. RESULTS: Seventy consecutive patients were evaluated over a two-year period. The average length of stay (LOS) following negative laparoscopy was 1.5 days, and for negative celiotomy 5.2 days. There were no missed intra-abdominal injuries following 30 negative laparoscopies, and 26 of 40 laparotomies were therapeutic. The technique also proved useful in evaluation of selected blunt and HIV+ trauma victims with unclear clinical presentations. However, while laparoscopy was accurate in assessing the abdomen following penetrating lower chest injuries, significant thoracic injuries were missed in 2 out of 11 patients who required subsequent return to OR for thoracotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy has become a useful and accurate diagnostic tool in the evaluation of abdominal trauma. Nevertheless, laparoscopy still carries a 20% nontherapeutic laparotomy rate. Additionally, significant intrathoracic injuries may be missed when laparoscopy is used as the primary technique to evaluate penetrating lower thoracic trauma.

Abdominal Injuries↗

PubMed1998

The role of staging laparoscopy for multimodal therapy of gastrointestinal cancer.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy and the therapeutic relevance of staging laparoscopy. METHODS: Between June 1993 and February 1997 staging laparoscopy was performed in 389 patients with various neoplasms. Additionally, 144 selected patients of this group were examined with laparoscopic ultrasound using a semiflexible ultrasound probe (7.5 MHz). RESULTS: Compared to conventional imaging methods, laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound improved the accuracy of staging in 158 of 389 patients (41%). Statistical subgroup analysis of 131 patients with gastric cancer showed that the accuracy of staging laparoscopy in the detection of distant metastases (68%) was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than that of ultrasound (63%) or computed tomography (58%). In the whole group, laparoscopy alone disclosed intraabdominal tumor dissemination or nonresectable disease in 111 patients. Laparoscopic ultrasound displayed additional metastases-i. e., liver metastases (n = 9), M1 lymph nodes (n = 15), or nonresectable tumors (n = 6) in 30 patients. Although metastastic disease was suggested by preoperative imaging, benign lesions were found in five patients with laparoscopy and in a further 12 patients with ultrasonography. The findings of staging laparoscopy changed the treatment strategy in 45% of the patients. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 5% of the cases, and complications related to laparoscopy occured in 4% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasound improves the staging of gastrointestinal tumors and has a significant impact on a stage-adapted surgical therapy.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Impact of diagnostic laparoscopy on the management of gastric cancer: prospective study of 120 consecutive patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal seeding or liver metastases found at laparotomy usually preclude curative treatment in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Such exploratory laparotomies may be avoided by diagnostic laparoscopy. However, routine diagnostic laparoscopy does not benefit those patients who proceed to laparotomy after negative laparoscopy. The aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the selective use of laparoscopy in uncertain situations. METHODS: One hundred and twenty consecutive patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma were studied prospectively. Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in patients with clinical T4 tumours or suspected metastases, unless laparotomy was required for symptomatic disease. RESULTS: Ninety-six of 120 patients were selected for immediate laparotomy with curative intent (n = 81) or for palliation (n = 15). In two of the 81 patients gastrectomy was abandoned because of unexpected peritoneal carcinomatosis. Fifteen patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy, which identified intra-abdominal metastases in six; the other nine patients proceeded to laparotomy, which revealed peritoneal metastases not detected at laparoscopy in four patients. The remaining nine patients had overt metastases and were referred for systemic chemotherapy without abdominal exploration. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic laparoscopy in selected patients effectively limits the number of unnecessary invasive staging procedures. Routine use of diagnostic laparoscopy in all patients with gastric adenocarcinoma is not warranted.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1998

Increased systemic inflammation after laparotomy vs laparoscopy in an animal model of peritonitis.

OBJECTIVE: To study the influence of laparotomy and laparoscopy on local and systemic inflammation in a rat model of peritonitis. DESIGN: Bacteremia, peripheral leukocyte subpopulations, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) plasma levels, and ex vivo secretion of peripheral blood mononuclear cells were investigated after laparotomy and laparoscopy in a prospective randomized experimental study. SETTING: Surgical department of a university hospital. ANIMALS: 60 male inbred Wistar rats. INTERVENTIONS: Standardized fecal inoculum was injected intraperitoneally and rats underwent laparotomy (n=20), laparoscopy (n=20), or no further manipulation (control group, n=20). Blood samples were obtained during the perioperative course to determine bacteremia, leukocytic subpopulations, TNF-alpha plasma levels, and ex vivo secretion. The number of intraperitoneal abscesses was determined in each animal after 1 week. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The hypothesis of the experiment was that laparoscopy with carbon dioxide leads to an increase of local and systemic inflammation in comparison with the laparotomy and control groups. RESULTS: One hour after intervention, bacteremia was significantly higher in the laparotomy and laparoscopy groups compared with the control group (P=.01). Fecal inoculum caused significant monocytopenia and lymphocytopenia in all groups within 1 hour after intervention (P<.05), with complete recovery on day 2 only in the laparoscopy and control groups. Laparotomy caused a significant increase in TNF-alpha plasma levels and decrease of ex vivo production of TNF-alpha compared with the other 2 groups (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Laparotomy and laparoscopy increased the incidence of bacteremia and systemic inflammation in this peritonitis model. The inflammatory response was significantly higher in the laparotomy group compared with the laparoscopy group.

Abdominal Abscess↗

PubMed1997

The feasibility of open laparoscopy in gynecologic-oncologic patients.

Gynecologic-oncologic patients are at increased risk for complications with closed laparoscopy. Open laparoscopy eliminates the steps of blind insufflation and trocar insertion. This study is the first large series of open laparoscopies to assess the feasibility and safety of the open laparoscopy technique in patients with gynecologic malignancies. We performed 90 open laparoscopies in 89 oncologic patients with previous major surgery (65%) and/or radiotherapy (17%) or a large omental cake (18%). Complications due to the laparoscopic access technique occurred in one patient (1%) for whom a laparotomy was performed for a small bowel perforation. The incidence of complications of the open laparoscopy technique (1%) is favorable compared to the complication rate of closed laparoscopy in gynecologic-oncologic patients. It is concluded that open laparoscopy is a safe and feasible technique in gynecologic-oncologic patients.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Selective celiotomy for missile wounds of the abdomen based on laparoscopy.

The role of laparoscopy in the selective management of gunshot wounds (GSW) of the abdomen was prospectively investigated in 38 patients. All the patients were hemodynamically stable and had equivocal evidence of intraabdominal penetration. Laparoscopy was performed in the operating room under anesthesia. The site of penetration was in the thoracoabdominal area in 13, epigastrium in 7, and lower quadrants in 18. Twenty-three (60.5%) had nonpenetration on laparoscopy and a laparotomy was avoided. The remaining patients had injuries to the liver (4 patients), spleen (two patients), diaphragm (3 patients), hemoperitoneum or retroperitoneal hematoma (6 patients), and hollow viscus injuries (5 patients). Laparoscopy was also helpful in determining the need for laparotomy vs thoracotomy in lower chest wounds. The negative laparoscopy group (no penetration) had a significantly lower hospital stay compared to hemodynamically stable patients who had negative laparotomy without laparoscopy for nonpenetrating GSW. There were no complications related to laparoscopy. Laparoscopy is a useful modality in the evaluation of hemodynamically stable patients with abdominal missile wounds.

Abdominal Injuries↗

PubMed2000

Appraisal of treatment strategy by staging laparoscopy for locally advanced gastric cancer.

More accurate preoperative staging is necessary to determine the treatment strategy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Thirty-two patients with T3 or T4 gastric cancer expected to undergo curative resection based on conventional examinations underwent staging laparoscopy. The disease stages determined were compared with those obtained by conventional methods. The discrepancy rate of disease staging was 16 of 32 (50.0%), with down-staging in 5 of 32 (15.6%) and up-staging in 11 of 32 (34.4%). Of the 32 patients, 13 (40.6%) were found to have unsuspected peritoneal dissemination. The positive predictive value for peritoneal metastasis by staging laparoscopy was 100%, whereas the negative predictive value was 89% (17/19). The accuracy rate was 94%. After laparoscopy, 15 of the 32 (46.9%) were diagnosed as candidates for curative resection. Of these 15 patients who underwent surgery, 13 (86.7%) underwent curative resection (1 R0 and 12 R1); the remaining two underwent R2 resection because of peritoneal metastasis that was undetected by staging laparoscopy. Patients with tumors judged noncurable by laparoscopy (n = 11) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In 7 of the 11 cases, salvage surgery was done (one R0, three R1, three R2 resections). A second staging laparoscopy was performed in four cases to determine the indication for salvage surgery. Three of the four were judged to be curable and underwent curative resection. Staging laparoscopy is an effective tool for detecting unsuspected peritoneal metastasis, and it can increase the curative resection rate and decrease unnecessary laparotomy for advanced gastric cancer. Second-look laparoscopy enables accurate assessment of the chemotherapeutic response, which can help in decisions about salvage surgery.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1997

Laparoscopy in the critically ill.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy was evaluated in critically ill patients with suspected acute cholecystitis, mesenteric ischemia, or gastrointestinal perforation. We studied laparoscopy to assess its utility, accuracy, and effect on cardiopulmonary stability. METHODS: Twenty-six surgical ICU patients with possible abdominal sepsis underwent laparoscopy. Nineteen were post cardiac surgery; the remainder had other diagnoses. Video laparoscopy was performed with hemodynamic monitoring and inotropic support as needed. Eight patients had bedside laparoscopy. RESULTS: Fifteen patients had suspected acute cholecystitis. Laparoscopy was positive in 10; four had open cholecystectomy, four laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and two tube cholecystostomy. Nine patients had suspected mesenteric ischemia; laparoscopy was positive in five, revealing cirrhosis in two and ischemic bowel in three. Two patients had suspected perforated viscus with colonic perforation in one and one false negative. There were no adverse hemodynamic events. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy can be performed safely in critically ill patients. It is useful in patients with acute cholecystitis and in patients who are post cardiac surgery with refractory lactic acidosis in whom a diagnosis of mesenteric ischemia is considered.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1997

The effect of laparoscopy on the movement of tumor cells and metastasis to surgical wounds.

BACKGROUND: A variety of mechanisms have been proposed to explain tumor growth in port sites following laparoscopic cancer surgery. We devised two experimental models to determine whether carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation during laparoscopic surgery influences the movement of tumor cells and leads to tumor implantation and growth in surgical wounds. METHODS: Model 1: Viable adenocarcinoma cells were introduced into the upper abdomen of six syngeneic immune-competent rats during laparoscopy with CO2 insufflation; the same procedure was followed for a further six rats during gasless laparoscopy. A length of plastic tubing introduced through the anterolateral aspect of the rats' left lower abdominal wall was used to vent the insufflation gas through the abdomen of a recipient rat for 30 min. After 21 days, the peritoneal cavity and surgical wounds of the recipient rat were examined for implanted tumor. Model 2: A suspension of radiolabeled adenocarcinoma cells was introduced into the upper abdomen of five rats during laparoscopy with CO2 insufflation and an additional five rats during gasless laparoscopy. A length of plastic tubing introduced through the anterolateral aspect of the left lower abdominal flank was used to vent the insufflation gas through phosphate-buffered saline solution. After 30 min, the solution was counted for radioactivity. RESULTS: Tumor growth occurred at the site of both the insufflation and venting ports in the second rat in five of the six rats from the group undergoing insufflation, but it was found in none of the gasless laparoscopy group (p = 0.015). In the second model, significant transfer of tumor cells to the vented gas occurred only in the rats undergoing laparoscopy with insufflation (median, 2.71% versus 0% of the introduced labeled cells; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Carbon dioxide insufflation results in tumor dissemination during laparoscopy, leading to port site metastasis. Gasless laparoscopy may prevent this problem.

Abdominal Muscles↗

PubMed2001

Laparoscopy predicts metastatic disease and spares laparotomy in selected patients with pancreatic nonfunctioning islet cell tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to compare the efficacy of CT alone to CT followed by laparoscopy in determining resectability of pancreatic nonfunctioning islet (NFI) cell tumors. METHODS: A retrospective analysis from 1993 to 1999 revealed 48 patients who underwent surgical evaluation for NFI cell tumors. Of these, 34 (71%) patients underwent laparoscopy and CT for either diagnostic purposes or tumor staging. CT and laparoscopic criteria for curative resectability were defined and the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of both modalities in determining resectability were calculated. RESULTS: The most frequent tumor location and presenting symptoms were pancreatic head (n = 27, 56%) and abdominal pain (n = 31, 65%), respectively. Median tumor size was 4.0 cm. In the laparoscopy group, curative resection was performed in 20 cases (59%). CT followed by laparoscopy was more sensitive than CT alone in predicting resectability (93% vs. 50%, P = 0.03) with similar specificity (both 100%). The predictive value for tumor resectability was 74% for CT alone and 95% for CT followed by laparoscopy. Reasons for unresectability identified at laparoscopy but not indicated by CT were liver metastases (n = 6) or nodal disease (n = 1). Four of these patients were spared a laparotomy while the other three patients underwent surgical palliation and all are alive with disease (AWD). In those not undergoing laparoscopy (n = 14), curative resection was performed in 64% (n = 9). Four of these patients underwent resection, despite having metastases, and three are AWD. CONCLUSIONS: NFI cell tumors of the pancreas present as large masses with frequent metastases. Despite metastatic disease, prolonged survival is often achieved with or without open surgical treatment. Laparoscopy can be used in diagnosis and accurately identifies metastases not seen on CT, thus sparing laparotomy in some patients.

Adenoma, Islet Cell↗

PubMed1996

A survey on (operative) laparoscopy in The Netherlands in 1992.

OBJECTIVE: A quantitative inventory of (operative) laparoscopic surgery practiced by Dutch gynecologists in 1992 was made. METHODS: A written inquiry was mailed to all 145 departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (including 28 teaching hospitals), where all 630 practicing gynecologists in The Netherlands are established. The questionnaire included questions about diagnostic laparoscopies, sterilizations, laparoscopy for infertility reason and operative laparoscopies. General information about follow-up training of the practitioner was also collected. All data were analyzed and comparisons were made between teaching and non-teaching hospitals. Statistical significance was calculated with the chi-square test. RESULTS: The response rate was 78%. A total of 419 respondents represented in 99 clinics reported performing 33,676 laparoscopic procedures, which makes an average of 80 procedures per physician per year. Distribution of procedures showed that 36% was for diagnostic laparoscopy, 33% for tubal sterilization, 19% laparoscopy for infertility work-up and 12% counted for therapeutic laparoscopy. Comparison of procedures in teaching hospitals (n = 27) and non-teaching hospitals (n = 72) showed only slightly more diagnostic laparoscopies for infertility in the first and more tubal-sterilizations in the latter. A statistically significant difference was found for the ring or clip sterilization in teaching hospitals, compared with the coagulation technique in non-teaching departments (P < 0.001). More difficult laparoscopic procedures such as ovarian cystectomy and conservative surgery of ectopic pregnancy were more frequently performed by those who had followed additional laparoscopic training (P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey are representative for (operative) laparoscopic practice of gynecologists in the Netherlands, because of the high response rate. Relatively, a small proportion of all laparoscopic procedures performed in 1992 are due to the therapeutic laparoscopy (12%). The great majority of therapeutic laparoscopic procedures was reported by a relatively small number of practitioners. Gynecologists who followed an additional laparoscopic training (30%) performed statistically more difficult laparoscopic procedures.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

PubMed1991

The acute abdomen: the role of laparoscopy.

The ability to improve surgical decision-making in the acute abdomen using selective laparoscopy is now established. When the decision to operate is uncertain laparoscopy not only identifies those patients who do not require laparotomy, but also reveals those who need surgery which might otherwise have been delayed. Furthermore, the high error rates in diagnosing acute appendicitis in young women provides overwhelming support to the current view that all women with suspected appendicitis should undergo laparoscopy before appendicectomy, irrespective of clinical 'certainty'. Improvements in the management of the acute abdomen can also be achieved by other techniques such as computer-assisted diagnosis (McAdam et al, 1990) and peritoneal cytology (Stewart et al, 1988), and a combination of these with selective laparotomy would be appropriate. Initial patient assessment using a structured proforma would appear to be one of the most significant factors in the improvement of diagnostic accuracy associated with the use of computers (Gunn, 1976), and their combination with a policy of selective laparoscopy has been shown to be beneficial (Paterson-Brown et al, 1989). The ability to detect which patients are likely to benefit from laparoscopy by performing peritoneal cytology first (Vipond et al, 1990) has been shown to be helpful in reducing the number of patients who undergo a 'negative laparoscopy' (Baigrie et al, 1990). It is now time for laparoscopy to return to the bosom of general surgery from where it was conceived almost a century ago. When it does, as the developments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy would predict it will, so surgeons in training must take the earliest opportunity to become as familiar and proficient with the technique as their gynaecological colleagues have done, even if this means attending the gynaecological operating lists to do so. It is only then that the undoubted benefits of laparoscopy will be spread more widely in general surgery and particularly for the patient with acute abdominal pain.

Abdomen, Acute↗

PubMedDate not supplied

A prospective study of laparoscopy versus minilaparotomy in the treatment of uterine myomas.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Comparison between laparoscopy and minilaparotomy in the management of intramural and/or subserosal uterine myomas. DESIGN: Prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred-thirteen women with at least one subserosal and/or intramural uterine myoma. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopy and minilaparotomy myomectomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We performed 213 myomectomies, 120 by minilaparotomy and 93 by laparoscopy. Median number of myomas removed per patient was 1.4 (range 1-3) and 2.9 (range 1-5) in the laparoscopy and minilaparotomy groups, respectively (p<.05). The estimated blood loss was not significant in either of the two groups, and no intraoperative or early postoperative complications were registered. The median operating time was 62.3 minutes (range 45-80 min) and 61.6 minutes (range 40-90 min) in the laparoscopy and minilaparotomy groups, respectively (p=NS). Median duration of ileus was 1.4 days (range 1-2) in the laparoscopy group and 1.3 days (range 1-2 days) in the minilaparotomy group (p=NS). Median length of hospital stay was 2.3 days (range 2-3 days) and 2.8 days (range 2-3 days) in the laparoscopy and minilaparotomy groups, respectively (p=NS.). CONCLUSION: Myomectomy by minilaparotomy can be considered a minimally invasive alternative to laparoscopy in the surgical management of intramural and subserosal myomas.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Laparoscopy in primary carcinoma of the gallbladder.

Fifty-three patients with suspected gallbladder carcinoma underwent ultrasonography and laparoscopy. Laparoscopy correctly excluded malignancy in five patients when ultrasonography had suggested gallbladder neoplasia. Of 48 patients with gallbladder carcinoma, laparoscopy identified 46 (95.8%) as compared with 30 (62.5%) by ultrasonography (p less than 0.001). Distant metastases in the liver, parietal peritoneum, or omentum were present in 41 patients (85.4%) and were detected by laparoscopy in 39 (sensitivity 95%) and by ultrasonography in 21 (sensitivity 51.2%) (p less than 0.001). Combination of ultrasonography and laparoscopy improved the overall diagnostic accuracy to 100%. Laparoscopy provided histological diagnosis of the disease in 36 patients (75%) and circumvented unnecessary laparotomy in 40 (83.3%) patients by revealing advanced or associated disease. When laparoscopy suggested that the disease was localized, the diagnosis was correct in 83.3% (5 of 6) patients. Laparoscopy under local anesthesia is useful in the diagnosis and staging of gallbladder carcinoma, and therefore helpful in planning management.

Carcinoma↗