SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “prognostic factor”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

PubMed1996

Surgery for lung metastases from colorectal cancer: analysis of prognostic factors.

PURPOSE: To identify prognostic factors of improved survival after resection of isolated pulmonary metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the records of all patients with PM from colorectal cancer who underwent thoracic surgery with curative intent before December 1992 at a single surgical center was performed. Univariate (log-rank) and multivariate (Cox's model) analyses of survival were used to identify significant prognostic factors. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients with PM from colon (n = 49) or rectal (n = 37) cancer underwent 102 thoracic operations, which included 21 bilateral and 10 incomplete resections. The 5- and 10-year probabilities of survival (Kaplan-Meier) after the first thoracic operation were 24% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15% to 35%) and 20% (95% CI, 13% to 31%), respectively. Sex, age, site of the primary tumor (colon or rectum), disease-free interval (DFI), and previous resection of hepatic metastases were found not to be statistically significant prognostic factors. Complete resection, a limited number ( < two) of PM, and a normal prethoracotomy serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level were predictors of a longer survival duration by univariate analysis, but only complete resection (P = .024) and preoperative CEA level (P = .001) were identified as independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis. The estimated 5-year survival rate of patients with a normal prethoracotomy CEA level was 60%, as compared with 4% in cases with elevated ( > 5 ng/mL) CEA level. CONCLUSION: Besides resectability, the prethoracotomy serum CEA level appears the most reliable predictor of survival in patients with isolated PM from colorectal cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2002

Evaluation of T factor, surgical method, and prognostic factors in central type lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We report our experience in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of central type lung cancer (CTLC) and discuss the prognostic significance of clinicopathological factors including the T factor. METHODS: Subjects were 151 patients with CTLC undergoing surgery from 1984 to 1999. Surgical procedures include lobectomy in 111, pneumonectomy in 35, and segmentectomy in 5. Bronchoplasty was done in 44, including sleeve lobectomy in 33, carinal resection in 8, and bronchoplasty without resection of pulmonary parenchyma in 3. Data on CTLC was compared to that on peripheral lung cancer during the same period. RESULTS: Compared to peripheral tumors, central lung tumors showed a higher ratio in male gender, pN1 in pN factors, squamous cell carcinoma in histology, and pneumonectomy and bronchoplasty in surgery. No statistical differences were seen between groups in surgical outcome, mean age, distribution pattern in pT factors, and extended surgery. The positive predictive cT factor has improved. No significant difference was seen in 5-year survival based on 8 factors--period, cT factors, tumor histology, bronchoplasty, extended surgery, cellular atypia, additional chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Five-year survival differed significantly for 12 other factors--pT, cN, and pN factors; surgical method; number of resected organs in extended surgery; curability (complete/incomplete); tumor size; N1 and N2 station metastasis; p factor, and blood vessel and lymphatic invasion. Multivariable analysis indicated only 2 independent prognostic factors--cN and p factor. CONCLUSIONS: CTLC appears to belong to a subgroup other than peripheral tumors, requiring a more accurate diagnosis of cT factors, particularly in the proximal bronchus, because cT and cN factors are the only 2 used preoperatively.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗

PubMed1988

[Prognostic factors of malignant lymphomas].

As prognostic factors of malignant lymphomas, many factors such as histopathology, clinical stage, surface phenotype, primary site, and serum LDH are listed. But when we analyse the data according to the period accumulated for a long time, big differences in survivals are always observed. This fact means that the therapeutic factors become a very important prognostic factors, and the importance of other prognostic factors are influenced by the therapeutic factors. The main subjects in the treatment of lymphomas are the improvement of therapeutic results and the reduction of the intensity of treatment of the patients in whom the cure are expected in high probability. In these situation, statistical analysis of the prognostic factors include therapeutic factor will contribute strongly to the improvement of treatment results.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2004

Overexpression of c-erbB-2 is related to a higher expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and constitutes an independent prognostic factor in primary node-positive breast cancer after adjuvant systemic treatment.

The aim of this study was to investigate possible associations between the expression of c-erbB-2 and the angiogenic factors vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), p53 status, routine breast cancer prognostic factors and survival. Expression of c-erbB-2, VEGF, bFGF, and p53 protein was determined with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 656 patients with primary breast cancer (median follow-up time of 83 months). In 60 cases, we also used immunohistochemistry (IHC) for c-erbB-2 evaluation, to be used as a reference for the ELISA. Overexpression of c-erbB-2 was significantly related to a higher expression of VEGF, lower bFGF content, negative steroid receptor status, and a high S-phase fraction. In multivariate analysis, c-erbB-2 was an independent prognostic factor for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in all patients, and in node-positive patients, irrespective of the adjuvant systemic therapy. Combined survival analyses regarding c-erbB-2 and VEGF yielded additional prognostic information.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2006

Epidermal growth factor receptor as a prognostic factor in locally advanced rectal-cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation.

PURPOSE: We investigated the prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in pretreatment biopsy specimens from patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Pretreatment biopsy specimens from 92 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were examined for EGFR expression by immunohistochemistry. EGFR expression was assessed by immunoreactive score (IRS). The prognostic value of EGFR expression was evaluated according to the level of EGFR expression. RESULTS: Epidermal growth factor receptor expression was positive in 65 patients (71%). EGFR expression levels were low (IRS 0 to 5) in 83 patients (90%) and high (IRS 6 to 7) in 9 patients (10%). A high level of EGFR expression was statistically significant for shorter overall survival (p = 0.013), disease-free survival (p = 0.002), and distant metastasis-free survival (p = 0.003), as compared with a low level of expression in univariate analysis. Grouping based on positive or negative EGFR expression did not represent prognostic significance for survival. In multivariate analysis, high EGFR expression was an independent prognostic factor for decreased disease-free survival (relative risk 2.4, p = 0.041) and distant metastasis-free survival (relative risk 2.6, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that high level of EGFR expression in a pretreatment biopsy specimen may be a significant adverse prognostic factor for disease-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

The International Prognostic Factors Project score for advanced Hodgkin's disease is useful for predicting outcome of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The International Prognostic Factors Project on Advanced Hodgkin's Disease developed a seven-factor prognostic score consisting of serum albumin, hemoglobin, gender, stage, age, leukocytosis and lymphocytopenia for newly diagnosed Hodgkin's disease patients who receive chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether this prognostic score would also be useful for Hodgkin's disease patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 379 patients who had autologous transplants for Hodgkin's disease, at the University of Nebraska Medical Center between October 1984 and December 1999. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine whether the prognostic factors identified by the International Prognostic Factors Project adversely influenced event-free survival (EFS) or overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Low serum albumin, anemia, age and lymphocytopenia were associated with poorer EFS and OS. Gender, stage and leukocytosis were not associated with significantly poorer outcomes. Estimated 10-year EFS was 38%, 23% and 7% for patients with 0-1, 2-3 or > or =4 of the adverse prognostic characteristics identified by the International Prognostic Factors Project, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic score for advanced disease is also useful for relapsed and refractory Hodgkin's disease patients undergoing high-dose therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Prognostic factors for carcinoma of the prostate.

Prognostic factors for prostatic carcinoma should be significant, independent and clinically important. They should be of practical use, and their determination should be affordable in everyday practice. Prognostic factors may be grouped into patient-related, tumor-related and treatment-related. They should meet certain requirements, such as possession of a clear biological significance, an adequate sample size (possibly more than 150 patients), no patient population bias, an adequate statistical test, such as Cox regression analysis, as well as optimized cut-off values and reproducibility. From a pathologist's view, prognostic factors with established values are grade, margin involvement, capsular penetration, seminal vesical involvement, metastases and invasion of fat in needle biopsies. In contrast to this, factors with little value are, among others, zone location or nuclear shape. If these guidelines for assessment of prognostic factors are not met, the prognostic factors grow exponentially, as an individual patient can only belong to one prognostic group. If one considers all three categories of prognostic factors together, the clinical stage matters most despite all uncertainties. The same holds true for grading; particularly, the well-differentiated grades on biopsy cores have the drawback of being reflected in the specimen only infrequently. The use of biomarkers to give a better prognostic information is also disappointing, as only PSA and PAP have a reliable value among 28 biomarkers. It is of note that new biomarkers are continuously being discovered and examined, such as cyclin A or D. Due to these deficiencies in all three categories of prognostic factors for prostatic carcinoma, prognostic indices in the form of nomograms were constructed. But, if these indices are employed to answer the most important question at the time of diagnosis, i.e., 'is this man a candidate for surveillance?', neoadjuvant treatment plus irradiation, neoadjuvant treatment plus radical prostatectomy, perineal radical prostatectomy, because of a low probability of extracapsular extension or positive lymph nodes, adjuvant therapy after local treatment with curative intent as opposed to progression-based treatment or immediate systemic treatment, let alone intermittent endocrine manipulation, are not reliably possible. The outcomes of the few available studies based on prognostic factors should be studied carefully. If considered, a valuable new way of estimating artificial neural networks is a possibility to come to practical terms.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

PubMed1982

A study on prognostic factors of uterine cervical cancer.

Prognostic factors of cancer of the cervix were studied in 286 cases treated by radiotherapy. The four items stated below relating to morphological characteristics and found to be comparatively easy to determine clinically were selected as prognostic factors. The factors are (1) clinical stage, (2) morphology of the uterine cervix, (3) histological type of cancer and (4) radiosensitivity. Each prognostic factor and prognosis indicated in every case by chi-square test (chi 2 test) a risk rate lower than 0.1%, a significant difference. Furthermore, every prognostic factor was given points according to their grade, and the total points were expressed as a prognostic index. The prognostic index was classified into the mold zone (from 1 to 8 points), the moderate zone (from 9 to 10 points), and the severe zone (from 11 to 18 points), and the five year survival rate of each zone was observed to be 91.5%, 56.1% and 18.9% respectively. Thus, at a risk of less than 0.1%, a significant difference was observed. By setting up the prognostic index, it was possible to estimate the prognosis of every case of cervical carcinoma, which to date had been nearly impossible to estimate by each prognostic factor alone.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1991

Histologic prognostic factors in ependymoma.

The prognostic value of a series of histologic signs and clinical features was studied in a series of 298 ependymomas, collected from different institutions. The distribution of tumor sites varied in relation to patient age, with infratentorial cases prevailing under 4 years. Life table univariate analysis demonstrated as highly significant prognostic factors: (1) the number of mitoses; (2) endothelial hyperplasia; (3) necrosis; (4) intracranial site; (5) age less than 4 years. Multivariate analysis by tumor site revealed mitoses cell density, age greater than 16 years in supratentorial cases, and subependymoma in infratentorial cases to be prognostically important. Comparison of the anaplastic variant with the other tumor types in intracranial cases did not show a significant difference in survival even though the median survival time of anaplastic cases was shorter. The main conclusion is that the histological criteria employed to diagnose anaplasia in ependymomas. The number of mitoses is a very important prognostic factor in supratentorial cases, whereas endothelial proliferations and necroses are much less important as prognostic factors than in gliomas.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1990

Relationship between epidermal growth factor receptor status and various prognostic factors in human breast cancer.

Relationship between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status and various prognostic factors was investigated in 91 human breast cancer tissues. Epidermal growth factor receptor was measured by biochemical competitive binding assay using iodine 125 epidermal growth factor (125I)-EGF. The EGFR status was not correlated with axillary lymph node involvement, tumor size, stage, and histologic type, but significantly correlated with histologic grading (P less than 0.05) and lymphatic invasion (P less than 0.01). Between EGFR and estrogen receptor (ER) status, a clear inverse relationship was observed (P less than 0.01). The Ki-67-positive stained cell rate, which reveals the proportion of cycling cells, was significantly higher in EGFR-positive tumor tissues than in EGFR-negative cases. Furthermore, preliminary postoperative survey demonstrated a high tendency of recurrence rate of patients with EGFR-positive tumors as compared with those with EGFR-negative tumors. These data suggest that EGFR status may be important for the prediction of biologically high malignant potential.

Antigens, Neoplasm↗

PubMed1991

Survival of patients with bladder cancer--analysis of prognostic factors.

A recognition of prognostic factors in the treatment of patients with bladder cancer is important. Using a variety of clinical and histological parameters, we have performed monovariable and multivariable analyses on the survival rates of patients. Eighty three patients with bladder cancer who underwent total cystectomy were studied. Eleven factors were evaluated, i.e. age, sex, tumor form, number and size of the tumors, histological stage and grade, intramural infiltration pattern, presence of intramural lymphatic and venous invasion, and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Monovariable analysis of survival curves indicated that histological stage and grade, intramural lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, and infiltration pattern are important as prognostic factors. Multivariable analysis, which is more relevant than monovariable analysis, showed that histological stage, followed by age, histological grade, intramural lymphatic invasion and infiltration pattern, in order of decreasing value, were most important as prognostic factors.

Female↗

PubMed2005

The expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha is a favorable independent prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common malignancy of the kidney composed of specific tumor types. The sporadic conventional RCCs are, in contrast to the other RCC types, characterized by a high rate of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) mutations and hypermethylation. The majority of these tumors lack functional VHL protein (pVHL) that leads to increased hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha (HIF-1alpha) expression. The pVHL is the physiologic regulator of the activity of HIF-1alpha by targeting it to the proteasome for degradation under normoxia. Both pVHL and HIF-1alpha target other genes that are important for cancer survival and proliferation. Expression of HIF-1alpha has been linked to poor prognosis in different malignancies, although few studies have been done on the relation between HIF-1alpha and clinical variables in RCC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: HIF-1alpha protein expression was analyzed in tumor tissue from 92 patients with RCC. HIF-1alpha was quantified by Western blot relative to a positive control. RESULTS: The HIF-1alpha protein was expressed as two bands which strongly correlated (r = 0.906, P < 0.001); therefore, they were added and the sum evaluated against clinicopathologic variables. There was no association between HIF-1alpha and gender, stage, grade, tumor size, or vein invasion. Conventional RCCs had significantly higher HIF-1alpha expression compared with papillary and chromophobe RCCs and kidney cortex. In conventional RCC, HIF-1alpha was an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: HIF-1alpha levels varied significantly between the different RCC types. In conventional RCC, HIF-1alpha was an independent prognostic factor. These data indicate that HIF-1alpha is involved in tumorogenesis and progression of RCC. Evaluation of other HIF target gene products and correlation to angiogenesis seems warranted.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Analysis of prognostic factors and applicability of Kohne's prognostic groups in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line irinotecan or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze prognostic factors for survival and to assess the applicability of Kohne's classification in patients treated with irinotecan- or oxaliplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-two consecutive cases from a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Median patient age was 62 years. Sixty percent were men. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was 0/1 in 88%. Primary tumor resection (PTR) was performed in 80.6% of patients who initially had stage IV disease. Chemotherapy consisted of fluoropyrimidines or raltitrexed plus irinotecan (50.5%), oxaliplatin (38.5%), or both (11%). Univariate and multivariate analyses for survival were performed using pretreatment patient characteristics. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 33.9 months and median overall survival was 15.9 months. Significantly unfavorable prognostic factors were PTR not being performed, disease involvement of >1 organ, liver metastases, undifferentiated histology, EGOG PS>1, increased serum carcinoembryonic antigen and cancer antigen 19.9 levels, hypoalbuminemia, leucocytosis, and elevated alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. Only ECOG PS, PTR, increased LDH level, no hypoalbuminemia, and number of organs involved retained prognostic value in the multivariate analysis. The incidence and median survival for Kohne's prognostic groups were as follows: good (54.2%; 20 months), intermediate (26.8%; 15.7 months), and poor (19%; 6.8 months). For patients with stage IV disease at presentation, PTR was associated with a significantly longer survival, mainly in patients with an ECOG PS of 0/1. CONCLUSION: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS, PTR, serum albumin, increased LDH levels, and organ involvement were the main prognostic indicators in our series. Kohne's prognostic groups, developed in the era of 5-fluorouracil treatment, also seem to be applicable to patients treated with combination chemotherapy. Primary tumor resection should always be considered, especially in patients with an ECOG PS of 0/1. However, the benefit of PTR and multiple-agent chemotherapy is questionable in patients with an ECOG PS of >1.

Aged↗

PubMed1995

[Prognostic factors in liver tumors].

The prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma is dismal. Long-term survival and cure of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be expected only after resection or hepatectomy followed by transplantation. Thus, prognosis primarily depends on the possibility of resective surgery, which is determined predominantly by anatomic extent of disease. This survey deals with factors that become effective after resection or transplantation and that have prognostic significance in univariate or multivariate analyses. Several studies have shown that resection for cure (R classification) and anatomical extent of the tumors (TNM) were the most important prognostic factors. Prognostic factors other than TNM and R can be grouped into clinical findings and pathological features. As to clinical findings, performance status is an important prognostic factor in one multivariate analysis. The effects of other factors as age, sex, tumor site, and hepatomegaly on prognosis were discussed controversially. As might be expected, studies on pathological factors yielded different results. Histological grade had an influence in one study, but not in another. Histological type and coexisting cirrhosis were important in multivariate analysis only in resected patients. The majority of factors (capsule formation, dysplasia of adjacent liver tissue, mitotic activity, bile production) were only investigated in univariate analyses. There are only few studies evaluating the prognostic importance of molecular pathology factors. None of them has shown convincing evidence that these parameters may give information more important than TNM and R classification. The prognostic importance of TNM for patients not treated by resective surgery is emphasized in many studies. Ascites, toxic syndrome, and laboratory variables as bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen, and serum albumin were independent predictors of survival. The prognosis of patients with cholangiocarcinoma is even worse than that of HCC-patients and only 25% patients resected with stage-II-tumors can be expected to survive for five years.

Age Factors↗

PubMed1997

Overexpression of epithelial macrophage colony-stimulating factor (CSF-1) and CSF-1 receptor: a poor prognostic factor in epithelial ovarian cancer, contrasted with a protective effect of stromal CSF-1.

Markedly elevated levels of macrophage colony-stimulating factor (CSF-1) in the serum and ascites of epithelial ovarian cancer patients have been previously associated with a poor prognosis. However, measurements of circulating CSF-1 cannot separate CSF-1 originating in the cancer cell from that originating in stromal macrophage or fibroblast. To study the prognosis related to expression of CSF-1 and its receptor in primary and metastatic ovarian cancers and to compare the significance of epithelial versus stromal CSF-1 expression, an immunohistochemical study of 130 ovarian carcinomas was performed. Twenty-two stage I and II and 108 stage III and IV primary tumors were studied. Metastatic lesions were also studied in 96 of these 130 cases, 90 of which came from those cases with advanced-stage disease. The intensity and extent of staining for CSF-1 in epithelium and stroma and for epithelial CSF-1 receptor was scored. Kaplan-Meier curves of survival were compared with the log-rank test. The Cox regression model was used for multivariate analysis. In the primary tumors, there was strong expression of CSF-1 receptor in 65%, epithelial CSF-1 in 36%, and stromal CSF-1 in 22%. In the metastases, there was strong staining for CSF-1 receptor in 65%, epithelial CSF-1 in 41%, and stromal CSF-1 in 15%; strong staining for both CSF-1 receptor and epithelial CSF-1 was noted in 26% of the cases. When the metastases expressed both CSF-1 receptor and epithelial CSF-1 strongly, a significant decrease in disease-free survival in stage III invasive ovarian cancers was observe (P = 0.043), which was found to be an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.007), with an increased relative risk of recurrence of 2.3-fold. Although strong staining for stromal CSF-1 in the primary tumor was not found to have prognostic value, for all stages and for the subsets of stages III and IV and for stage III alone, the finding of any degree of stromal CSF-1 expression in the ovary was a favorable prognostic factor for disease-free (P = 0.046) and overall (P = 0.015) survival. This finding was associated with younger patients (P = 0.007) and low-grade tumors (P = 0.033) and was not an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis. Among the primary tumors, there was a significant association (P = 0.022) between stromal CSF-1 staining and lack of strong coexpression of CSF-1 receptor and epithelial CSF-1; 67 of 94 cases shared these features in the primary tumors. In the metastases of invasive stage III cases, strong staining for stromal CSF-1 was a favorable prognostic factor for overall survival in the absence of strong CSF-1 receptor staining (P = 0.033) and was associated with low-grade tumors (P = 0.0002). We report that strong expression of epithelial CSF-1 along with its receptor in the metastases of ovarian cancer patients appears to be a strong independent poor prognostic factor for outcome. We find that expression of the same cytokine (CSF-1) in the stroma of the primary tumors is associated with low-grade tumors and lack of strong coexpression of CSF-1 receptor and epithelial CSF-1, leading to an improved long-term outcome. This study may help explain the previous observations that elevated levels of CSF-1 in serum and ascites are associated with a worse prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer patients; the results suggest that the source of secreted CSF-1 may largely be the epithelium. The results of this study suggest that paracrine effects of stromal CSF-1 on tumor behavior contrast with those demonstrated when the tumor cell is capable of autocrine intracellular or extracellular interactions between CSF-1 and its receptor.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2000

Angiogenesis and cathepsin expression are prognostic factors in pancreatic adenocarcinoma after curative resection.

BACKGROUND: Curative resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the only clinical parameter related to a favorable prognosis while other clinicopathological parameters fail. To evaluate whether angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or certain tumor proteases, e.g., cathepsin B (CTSB) and L (CTSL), are factors of prognostic relevance, we investigated their expression in patients with long- and short-term survival after curative resection (RO) because of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Twenty-nine tissue samples from patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were examined. The patients were selected in a long-term survival group with a survival > or = 24 mo (n = 18) and a shortterm survival group of patients, who died within 8 mo after surgery because of their malignancy (n = 11). The microvessel quantification was performed immunohistochemically using a monoclonal anti-CD34 antibody. VEGF, CTSB, and CTSL expressions was studied using polyclonal antibodies (PAbs). RESULTS: The median microvessel density (MVD) was 75 (range 39-182). MVD correlated significantly with the survival time after surgery (p = 0.0132) but not with clinicopathological parameters. In cancer cells, VEGF was positive in 82.8% and showed significant correlation with the MVD (p = 0.0002) and survival time (p = 0.0395). Positive immunoreactivity could be obtained for 96.5% for CTSB and 84.2% for CTSL. Expression of both proteases correlated significantly with the survival time after surgery (CTSB p = 0.0002, CTSL p = 0.0001). Furthermore, CTSB expression correlated with invasion of the perineural space. Thus, a short postoperative survival correlated with a high MVD, and highly expressed VEGF, CTSB, and CTSL. No significant correlation between MVD, VEGF, as well as CTSL and clinicopathological parameters was found. For routinely assessed markers (e.g., TNM-stage, UICC-stage, and so on) no significant correlation with survival time was found in this small group of patients. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the MVD, VEGF, CTSB, and CTSL are prognostic factors after curative resection, whereas other parameters (TNM, UICC, and so on) failed to show prognostic relevance in our group of patients. Furthermore, the correlation between MVD and VEGF underlines the importance of this growth factor for angiogenesis and tumor growth. The correlation between CTSB and perineural invasion demonstrates the involvement of cathepsins in local tumor invasion.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1998

Predictive factors of tumor response and prognostic factors of survival during lung cancer chemotherapy.

The aim of this study was (i) to determine predictive factors of a complete response to chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and predictive factors of an objective response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and (ii) to determine whether prognostic factors are different with regard to treatment response and survival. Ninety-nine patients with SCLC and two hundred and two patients with NSCLC received chemotherapy. The following variables were recorded prior to treatment: tumor, node, metastasis status, performance status, body weight loss, blood leukocyte count, serum sodium, serum albumin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase, serum NSE, serum TPS, and serum CYFRA 21-1. Tumor response was analyzed at the 10th week. Analysis of survival were done using the landmark method. Hazard ratios of the significant prognostic variables of survival were calculated using the Cox's model. Odds ratios of the significant predicting factors of response were calculated by stepwise logistic regression. In SCLC, the significant determinants of poor survival were: lack of complete response (HR: 2.04), weight loss (HR: 1.76), high serum LDH level (HR: 1.64), and high serum TPS level (HR: 2.47). A high serum TPS level was the only factor among those studied able to predict lack of achievement of complete response (OR: 0.39). In NSCLC, significant determinants of poor survival were: no objective response (HR: 2.28), poor performance status (HR: 2.52), presence of metastases (HR: 1.51), and high serum CYFRA 21-1 level (HR: 1.84). On the other hand, a high serum TPS level (OR: 0.50), the presence of metastases (OR: 0.45), and a leukocyte blood count over 10,000/microl (OR: 0.43) were independent determinants for a patient not to achieve an objective response. We concluded that the predictive factors of complete response in SCLC remain to be defined. On the other hand, in NSCLC three variables contribute to the prediction of an objective response. Finally, determinants of survival differ from predictive factors of response.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Assessment of prognostic factors in breast cancer].

Prognostic factors predict the long term outcome of treatment, recurrence rate and overall survival. Treatment decision is based on assessment of prognostic factors. They are classified as clinical (age, menopausal status, tumoral growth rate, inflammatory signs), histological (tumoral stage, pathological type, grading, tumoral necrosis, lymph nodes status, margins status) and biological factors (steroidal receptors pattern, ploidy etc). There are tumor markers currently evaluated, being considered conventional and new markers that are not usually evaluated. Patients with negative lymph node will show no recurrences after surgery and/or radiotherapy in 70% of the cases. Factors with specific prognostic value are used for deciding on the therapeutic strategy in negative axillary node cases.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗