PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ABDOMINAL INJURIES”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,081 records · Page 60Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Gunshot wounds to the buttocks: predicting the need for operation.

BACKGROUND: Gunshot wounds to the buttocks may cause significant intra-abdominal injuries. Policies of aggressive abdominal exploration or extensive diagnostic testing have been suggested to avoid delays in treatment and consequent morbidity. Our group has recently suggested that clinical examination is a safe and reliable tool for triaging patients with anterior and posterior abdominal gunshot wounds. OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that patients with gunshot wounds to the buttocks can be managed selectively on the basis of clinical findings. SETTING: A large academic Level I trauma center was the setting for this study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients, suffering from gunshot wounds to the buttocks with potential retroperitoneal trajectories, were managed during a 12-month period in our center. RESULTS: Based on clinical findings, 19 (32.2 percent) patients were operated on, with significant intra-abdominal injuries in 17 (28.8 percent). The remaining 40 (67.8 percent) patients were successfully observed. There were no missed injuries or delays in diagnosis. Sensitivity and specificity of clinical examination for identifying significant intra-abdominal injury was 100 percent and 95.3 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: Clinical examination is a safe method for selecting patients with gunshot wounds to the buttocks for nonoperative treatment.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed1977

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage for blunt trauma in pregnant women.

Twelve pregnant women underwent diagnostic peritoneal lavage for suspected blunt abdominal trauma. Peritoneal lavage was both safe and accurate. The lavage was negative in four patients. Two of these patients survived without clinical evidence of abdominal injuries. The absence of abdominal injuries was confirmed at autopsy in the two patients who subsequently died. Peritoneal lavage was positive for hemoperitoneum in eight patients. All eight had significant abdominal injuries.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2005

Abdominal trauma: a disease in evolution.

BACKGROUND: The last decade has seen many changes in the way we investigate and manage abdominal injuries. This study assessed the pattern of abdominal injury and its investigation in patients admitted to a major trauma centre. METHODS: A retrospective registry review of all adult trauma patients admitted to Liverpool Hospital between January 1996 and December 2003 was undertaken. All adult trauma patients were included, identifying mechanism of injury, injury severity score, abbreviated injury score for the abdomen, investigations and intervention. The study period was divided (period 1 from 1996 to 1999, period 2 from 2000 to 2003) and the two periods compared to assess change. RESULTS: The study involved 1224 patients with abdominal injuries. Of these, 969 (79%) were a result of blunt trauma. The main causes were road accidents (61%), interpersonal violence (24%) and falls (7%). Penetrating injury increased from 16% to 25% between the two periods. There were 1274 intra-abdominal injuries, made up of 607 solid organ (liver (n = 220, 36%), spleen (n = 195, 32%), renal (n = 144, 24%) ), 291 hollow viscus (small bowel (n = 160, 55%), large bowel (n = 104, 36%) ) and 168 vascular. Four hundred and thirty-six (36%) patients underwent laparotomy, 65% for blunt trauma. Between the two periods there was a 46% decrease in the use of diagnostic peritoneal lavage, with a 40% increase in computed tomography and 325% increase in focused assessment with sonography for trauma. CONCLUSIONS: This study defined abdominal injury pattern and identified a significant shift in mechanism of injury and abdominal investigation at a major trauma centre during an 8-year study period. Abdominal trauma is indeed a disease in evolution.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2004

Traumatic lumbar hernia: report of cases and comprehensive review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Acute lumbar hernia secondary to blunt trauma is an uncommon injury of the abdominal wall and, when encountered, is a difficult challenge for the trauma surgeon. METHODS: Three cases of lumbar hernia secondary to blunt trauma are described and a review of the literature was conducted for other such cases. Clinical, anatomic, and demographic data were extracted from these reports and analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-three cases of lumbar hernia secondary to blunt trauma were found in the English literature and three cases are described here. Hernias occurred most commonly in the inferior lumbar triangle (70%) and were most frequently a result of a motor vehicle collision (71%). Physical examination findings were variable and reported in only a minority of cases (palpable hernia, 33%; flank hematoma, 27%) and associated intra-abdominal injuries were common (61%). Most traumatic lumbar hernias were diagnosed immediately, and computed tomography was 98% sensitive for diagnosis. Fifty-eight percent of patients were managed initially with exploratory laparotomy. Timing of hernia repair was variable. CONCLUSION: Traumatic lumbar hernias are associated with a high incidence of intra-abdominal injury and should be considered in all cases of severe blunt abdominal trauma. Computed tomography should be implemented when the diagnosis is suspected in a hemodynamically stable patient. Repair should be performed by mesh patching techniques at a time based on clinical correlation.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Endovascular management of blunt abdominal aortic injury.

The endovascular management of blunt aortic injuries is being used more frequently in the trauma patient. Traumatic aortic injuries usually occur in the descending thoracic aorta near the origin of the left subclavian artery. Many reports in the literature demonstrate the efficacy of endovascular repair of blunt thoracic aortic injury. We report here an unusual case of abdominal aortic dissection secondary to blunt abdominal trauma following a fall. The patient also had associated intra-abdominal injuries requiring bowel resection and repair of small bowel mesenteric lacerations. He was treated with a bifurcated abdominal endograft with an excellent result after the initial operation was performed to treat the bowel injuries.

Accidental Falls↗
PubMed2002

Associated injuries in blunt solid organ trauma: implications for missed injury in nonoperative management.

BACKGROUND: During the past decade, nonoperative management (NOM) of hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patients with liver (L) or spleen (S) injury has become the standard of care. This trend has led to concerns over missed associated intra-abdominal injuries with concomitant morbidity. To better understand the incidence and risk of missed injury, patterns of associated intra-abdominal injury were examined in all patients with blunt liver and spleen injuries, and missed injuries were reviewed in patients undergoing NOM. METHODS: Patients were identified from the registry of a Level I trauma center over a 3-year period. Records were reviewed for demographics, injury characteristics, and associated injuries. Indications for primary operation were hemodynamic instability or significant associated intra-abdominal injury. Missed injury was defined as unsuspected intra-abdominal injury requiring laparotomy in patients otherwise undergoing NOM for liver or spleen injury. RESULTS: Eight hundred three patients (338 in the L group, 345 in the S group, and 120 in the L + S group) were treated between December 1995 and December 1998. Rates of planned NOM were 89% (L group), 78% (S group), and 75% (L + S group). On examination of all patients with blunt liver or spleen injuries, the incidence of associated intra-abdominal injury was higher in the L group at 5% as compared with 1.7% in the S group (p = 0.02). The associated intra-abdominal injury rate in the L + S group was similar to the L group at 4.2%. Although in the L and S groups, rates of diaphragm (0.5% vs. 1%, p = 0.45) and intra-abdominal bladder injury (0.3% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.99) were similar, bowel injury was more common in the L group (11% vs. 0%, p = 0.0004), as was pancreatic injury (7% vs. 0%, p = 0.007). In NOM patients, missed injury occurred in seven (2.3%) L patients versus zero S patients (p = 0.012). No L + S patient had unexpected injuries. Missed injuries included two small bowel, three diaphragm, one pancreas, and one mesenteric tear. CONCLUSION: Damage to the pancreas and bowel is significantly associated with liver as opposed to spleen injuries. Actual missed intra-abdominal injury with NOM mirrors this pattern, occurring more often with liver than with spleen injuries. However, the overall incidence of missed injury is quite low, and should not influence decisions concerning eligibility for NOM. We speculate that the greater amount and/or different vector of energy transfer needed to injure the liver versus the spleen accounts for the greater rate of associated injuries to the pancreas/small bowel.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2003

[The comparison of the results of the conservative treatment between isolated solid organ injuries and those injuries associated with extraabdominal injuries after blunt abdominal trauma between isolated solid organ injuries and those injuries associated with extraabdominal injuries after blunt abdominal trauma].

BACKGROUND: To determine whether conservative treatment in blunt abdominal solid organ injuries associated with extraabdominal trauma is safe or not. METHODS: Between December 1998 and December 2001, 49 patients were admitted with blunt abdominal trauma, 34 of whom were hemodynamically stable. These 34 patients were divided into two groups. Seventeen patients had isolated abdominal solid organ injuries (Group I) and 17 patients had associated extraabdominal injuries (Group II). The results of conservative treatment, blood pressure values, pulse rates, ages, gender, abdominal solid organ injury scores, the etiologies of trauma, the number of the blood transfusions, morbidity and mortality rates, and hospital stays were compared. RESULTS: The blood pressure values and pulse rates as measured in our emergency room, abdominal solid organ injury scores, ages, gender, the results of conservative treatment, the etiologies of trauma, morbidity and mortality rates were similar in both groups. Comparisons between hospital stays and numbers of the blood transfusion have show statistically significant differences in favour of group II. No patients had hollow viscus injury. CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment is safe for hemodynamically stable blunt abdominal trauma patients with solid organ injury but no hollow viscus injury, even if they have extraabdominal injuries. The existence of extraabdominal injuries, however, prolongs the hospital stay and increases the need of the blood transfusion.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed1986

Unexpected, unsuspected and missed injuries in a paediatric trauma unit.

In a newly established trauma unit 12 282 patients were seen in 1 year, of whom 1 557 were admitted. Out of the total there was 0.3% of missed, unexpected or unsuspected injuries; this was 2.5% of ward admissions. These injuries are classified and analysed, highlighting the need for constant vigilance. Although the majority were orthopaedic injuries, the abdominal injury cases show that these can be more severe than clinically suspected.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2004

Clinical analysis of craniocerebral trauma complicated with thoracoabdominal injuries in 2165 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the optimal treatment for craniocerebral trauma complicated with thoraco-abdominal injuries. METHODS: A total of 2165 cases of craniocerebral trauma complicated with thoraco-abdominal injuries admitted to our hospital between July 1993 and June 2003 were retrospectively studied. Among them, 382 cases sustained severe craniocerebral trauma (in which 167 were complicated with shock), 733 thoracic injuries, 645 abdominal injuries and 787 thoraco-abdominal injuries. On admittance, 294 cases had developed shock. With the prime goal of saving life, respiratory and circulatory systems and encephalothilipsis were especially treated and monitored. Priority in management was directed to severe or open injures rather than to moderate or closed injures. For cases with cerebral hernia due to intracranial hematoma and severe shock due to blood loss, cerebral hernia and shock were treated concurrently. RESULTS: After treatment, 2024 (93.49%) cases survived and the other 141 (6.51%) died. Among patients who had severe craniocerebral injury with shock and those without, 78 (46.71%) and 53 (24.56%) died, respectively. For patients who had underwent craniocerebral and thoraco-abdominal operations concurrently and those who had not, the death rates were 58.49%-65.96% and 28.57% respectively, indicating a significant difference (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment for hematoma hernia, shock and disturbed respiration is the key in the management of multiple trauma of craniocerebral, thoracic or abdominal injuries, especially when two or three conditions occurred simultaneously. Unless it is necessary, operations at two different parts at the same time is not recommended. It is preferred to start two concurrent operations at different time.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Gunshot injuries to the hip and abdomen: the association of joint and intra-abdominal visceral injuries.

A retrospective review of all gunshot injuries to the hip at our medical center over a 24-year period was performed. Adequate information and radiographs were available for 49 patients. Of these, five patients (10.2%) had associated abdominal visceral injuries. These five patients were examined at an average of 5.9 years after their injury, and compared by utilizing the Harris Hip Score rating. Radiographs were also obtained. Four of these five patients (80%) had initially developed infections in their hip joints, with all four having poor functional outcomes, with an average Harris Hip Score of 48.5 from their hip injury. Careful initial evaluation and aggressive surgical and antibiotic treatment are recommended to prevent these poor results.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed1997

The impact of the quantity of skeletal injury on mortality and pulmonary morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the quantity of skeletal injuries (and the timing to fixation) increases the mortality or pulmonary morbidity in patients with and without chest injuries. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of trauma registry. Statistical analysis with multiple logistic regression and chi(2) analysis. METHODS: Looking specifically at adult patients (> 16 years), skeletal injury was quantified by determining the presence or absence of a fracture in specific body regions (humeri, forearm, femur, tibia, spine, and pelvis) for a maximum of 10 skeletal injuries. The timing of fixation for fractures was categorized as < 24 hours, < 48 hours, < 72 hours, < 5 days, > 5 days, or no fixation. Chest injuries and pulmonary morbidity were based on the accepted list of complications reported in the literature. RESULTS: Three groups were analyzed according to the presence or absence of a chest or skeletal injury: those without skeletal injury (group NSI, n = 59), those without chest injuries (group NCI, n = 108), and those with both skeletal and chest injuries (group B, n = 59) Pulmonary Complications: When all patient groups (NCI, NSI, and B) were pooled, greater chest injury (p < 0.0008), greater skeletal injury (p < 0.02), and delayed fixation (p < 0.04) were associated with increased risk of developing a pulmonary complication. In the group of patients without a chest injury (NCI), this risk was associated with greater head injury (p < 0.005) and greater skeletal injury (p < 0.04), whereas in the group without a skeletal injury (NSI), only chest injury demonstrated significance (p < 0.05). When both skeletal and chest injuries were present, greater head injury (p < 0.03) and fixation time (p < 0.03) increased the risk of developing a pulmonary complication. Mortality: With all patients pooled (NCI, B, and NSI), head injury (p < 0.02), abdominal injury (p < 0.012), and fixation time (p < 0.01) were risk factors. In patients without a chest injury (NCI), none of the indexed variables were associated with mortality. In patients without a skeletal injury (NSI), greater head injury (p < 0.01), greater chest injury (p < 0.01), and greater abdominal injury (p < 0.04) were risk factors for mortality. When both chest and skeletal injuries were present (B), only head injury (p < 0.0003) was associated with mortality. The prevalence of mortality and pulmonary complications were compared between groups NCI, NSI, and B. Group NCI had fewer pulmonary complications (p < 0.004) than the other groups (difference not significant). When examining mortality, group NCI had less mortality than groups NSI and B. CONCLUSION: The combination of skeletal and chest injuries does not seem to amplify the pulmonary morbidity and mortality compared with chest injury alone. The quantity of the skeletal injury and the time to fixation of structures affecting mobilization seem to have an effect on pulmonary morbidity and mortality. Better scientific studies on the effects of skeletal injury and timing to fixation in relation to pulmonary morbidity and mortality are required.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Intra-abdominal seatbelt injury.

The use of seatbelts has significantly decreased the mortality and morbidity of injuries caused by motor vehicle accidents. We present eight patients who sustained severe intra-abdominal injuries peculiar to the use of the seatbelt. Serious injuries to the bowel and mesentery may be present without early symptoms or physical signs and neither CT scanning nor diagnostic peritoneal lavage is fully reliable or accurate in finding the injury. Prompt diagnosis may be difficult and requires a high index of suspicion as well as a determined approach that may include exploratory celiotomy. The presence of a seatbelt sign across the abdomen is not incontrovertible evidence that a laparotomy must be done, but its presence should create a high index of suspicion for serious visceral injury. Delay in diagnosis significantly increases morbidity and is associated with high mortality rates.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed1987

Abdominal pain in athletes.

Abdominal pain in an athlete may be due to an intra-abdominal injury or abdominal disease unrelated to athletics; both are uncommon. Because such processes may be life-threatening, awareness of their typical patterns is imperative for all involved in sports medicine. Evaluation of an athlete with abdominal pain is thus directed at deciding if the athlete has significant abdominal disease, and then using appropriate diagnostic methods to determine the specific process.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMed2006

Abdominal wall injuries: rectus abdominis strains, oblique strains, rectus sheath hematoma.

Abdominal wall injuries are reported to be less common than actually perceived by sports medicine practitioners. National Collegiate Athletic Association injury statistics for 2004-2005 cite a high of 0.71 abdominal muscle injuries per 1000 player-hours in wrestling competition to a low of 0.01 injuries per 1000 player-hours in autumn football practices. British professional soccer clubs reported an incidence of "torso" injuries of up to 7% of all injuries over the course of several seasons. Injury definition is most likely the explanation for this discrepancy. The abdominal wall muscles (rectus abdominis, external and internal obliques, and transverse abdominis) are injured by direct blows to the abdomen or by sudden or repetitive trunk movement, either rotation or flexion/extension. With the exception of the rare rectus sheath hematoma that does not self-tamponade, the treatment for these problems is nonoperative with symptoms guiding rehabilitation and return to play decisions.

Abdominal Muscles↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Abdominal war injuries].

In the period of July 1, 1991-December 31, 1992, 4292 wounded were treated in the Military Medical Academy (MMA) in Belgrade. Out of 410 (9.6%) wounded with abdominal war injuries, 156 (38%) received the primary treatment in MMA and the remainder in other hospitals. One fifth of the wounded with abdominal injuries suffered combined injuries of more organs and 82.7% of the cases had multiple injuries of one organ or combined injury of two or more abdominal organs. Wounding caused by explosive devices prevailed (61.5%), and the most frequently injured organs were small intestine in 40% and colon in 30.7% of the cases. Reoperation due to complications was performed in 7% of the wounded primarily managed in MMA and 33.8% of there primarily managed in other hospitals. Total mortality due to the abdominal war injuries was 10.9%, while mortality in patients primarily managed in MMA amounted to 4.5% compared to 14.9% of those operated on in other hospitals.

Abdominal Injuries↗