SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Guidelines”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,081 records · Page 60Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Current management of bipolar affective disorder: is it reflective of the BAP guidelines?

In October 2003 the British Association of Psychopharmacology (BAP) published evidence-based guidelines on the management of bipolar disorder. The aim of this study was to assess whether the guidelines could provide the basis for examining clinical decisions and the extent to which practice accords with these guidelines. Case notes of out patients with bipolar disorder were reviewed. Demographic details, and treatment recommendations were determined. The management of affective episodes was evaluated and compared with BAP guidelines. In 84 subjects, 224 affective episodes were identified. Treatment was consistent with BAP guidelines in 72% of episodes. Mania was more likely to be managed in accordance with guidelines than depression or mixed episodes. The use of antidepressant medication was the most likely intervention to deviate from recommendations. Reasons for treatments at odds with the guidelines were identified. Our study demonstrates that clinical practice among a range of psychiatrists broadly reflects the guidelines that have been issued by the British Association of Psychopharmacology (BAP). The BAP guidelines offer a practical and auditable basis for the short- and long-term treatment of bipolar affective disorder.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Text-to-algorithm conversion to facilitate comparison of competing clinical guidelines.

This study aimed to test the usefulness and reliability of text-to-algorithm conversion in comparing competing clinical guidelines and defining their differences. Two pairs of competing guidelines for measles immunization, published in 1989 and 1994, were analyzed and compared. Five categories of differences were detected: differences in recommendations, excluded elements, logical inconsistencies, nonspecific phrases, and approaches to contraindications. On a scale of 0-10 (where identical=10), the overall comparison scores were 6.01 for the guidelines published in 1989 and 5.54 for the guidelines published in 1994. Text-to-algorithm conversions performed by three different persons on the 1989 guidelines were compared and found similar. Text-to-algorithm conversion is an important step in facilitating comparison of competing guidelines. It has the potential to assist in making rational and systematic choices between competing guidelines before actual field testing takes place. Physicians can use it to analyze and to learn a prose clinical guideline, to critique existing guidelines, and to simulate hypothetical patients for teaching and evaluating clinical management.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

The impact of legislatively imposed practice guidelines on cesarean section rates: the Florida experience.

Florida legislation implemented in the fall of 1992, unique in the nation, mandated that practice guidelines regarding cesarean section deliveries be disseminated to obstetric physicians. The law also required that peer review boards at hospitals be established to review cesarean deliveries and that the exact dates of implementation of the guidelines be reported to a state agency. To determine the impact of the legislation, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 366,246 total live births occurring in Florida hospitals during 1992 and 1993, before and after formal hospital certification of the implementation of the guidelines. Changes in primary and repeat cesarean rates were analyzed for 108 independent groups of births, controlling for the mother's age, race, payment source, and the timing of the implementation of the guidelines at hospitals. The guideline certification program did not accelerate the consistent but gradual downward trend in cesarean births which had already been evident in the three prior years. The data do suggest that the guideline program may have affected repeat cesareans more than primary cesareans, especially in the first quarter of 1993, immediately after the hospital certification period. Reductions in repeat cesareans involved both Medicaid and commercially insured births, whereas reductions in primary cesareans were found almost exclusively within commercially insured mothers, where the existing rates are highest. Although births with a prior cesarean represent only 12.5% of all births, significant decreases in repeat cesareans were found in groups representing 72.6% of this population. By comparison, significant decreases in primary cesareans were found in groups representing only 36.5% of the births without a prior cesarean. The date of guideline implementation reported by hospitals was not related to any systematic change in observed cesarean section rates. We concluded that the mere dissemination of practice guidelines by a state agency may not achieve either the magnitude or the specificity of the results desired without an explicit and thorough guideline implementation program. Blunt legislative mandates may be ineffective when multiple initiatives are already achieving desired outcomes.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Can surveying practitioners about their practices help identify priority clinical practice guideline topics?

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines are systematically developed statements designed to assist in patient and physician clinical decision making for specific clinical circumstances. In order to establish which guideline topics are priorities, practitioners were surveyed regarding their current practice. METHODS: One hundred ninety-seven practitioners in Ontario, Canada were mailed a survey exploring their current practice or opinion regarding the prophylactic use of anticonvulsant drugs in patients with malignant glioma who had never had a seizure. The survey consisted of seven questions regarding the relevance of a guideline on the subject to the practitioner's practice, the proportion of clinical cases involving anticonvulsant use, knowledge of existing guidelines on this topic, interest in reviewing a completed practice guideline and three clinical scenarios. RESULTS: There were 122 respondents who returned the survey (62% rate of return). Eighty percent of the practitioners who responded indicated that less than 25% of their clinical cases involved the use of anticonvulsants; however, only 16% of respondents indicated that a practice guideline would be irrelevant to their practice. Eighty percent of respondents volunteered to review a draft version of a practice guideline on the use of anticonvulsants. The survey presented the practitioners with three scenarios where anticonvulsants in patients with brain tumours may be appropriate: peri-operatively in patients without seizures, postoperatively in patients currently using anticonvulsants, and thirdly in patients not currently using anticonvulsants or undergoing surgery. In contrast to the third situation, the first two situations yielded considerable variation in practitioner response. CONCLUSION: The survey established that there is some variation present in the current practice of anticonvulsant use in the patients with brain tumours. Whether there is an optimal treatment practice has yet to be determined. Practitioners do seem to feel that a guideline on anticonvulsant use in warranted, and most practitioners would be interested in being part of the guideline development process.

Anticonvulsants↗

PubMed2005

Schizophrenia practice guidelines: international survey and comparison.

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia guidelines differ considerably in methodology and content. AIMS: To systematically compare national schizophrenia guidelines from different countries. METHOD: An international survey was conducted on guideline development and a methodological comparison was made using a validated guideline appraisal instrument (the Appraisal Guideline Research and Evaluation Europe). RESULTS: The methodological quality of many schizophrenia guidelines was at best moderate. Few guidelines had included key stakeholders in their development process. Although pharmacotherapy recommendations were similar, there were strong variations in the type of psychosocial interventions recommended. CONCLUSIONS: The methodological quality of guidelines has a strong influence on their applicability. However, the lack of financial means to develop and implement guidelines is a serious problem. Independent international organisations could contribute to defining a core set of unbiased schizophrenia treatment recommendations. In countries with a shortage of resources, this could be a basis for adaptation to different cultural and economic backgrounds in collaboration with stakeholders.

Antipsychotic Agents↗

PubMed2002

A review of guidelines and standards for telemedicine.

We conducted a review to establish the range and scope of current telemedicine guidelines and standards. Published guidelines were identified by searching the Medline and Telemedicine Information Exchange (TIE) databases, and by performing a Google search using the term 'telemedicine guidelines'. Three types of guidelines were identified, namely clinical, operational and technical. Clinical guidelines included those for teleradiology, telepsychiatry, home telenursing, minor injuries telemedicine, surgical telemedicine, teledermatology and telepathology. Operational guidelines included those for email communication, Internet access and videoconferencing. Technical guidelines included those from the American Telemedicine Association and the US Office for the Advancement of Telehealth. The main standards relevant to telemedicine include those of the International Telecommunication Union and the DICOM standard. The scarcity of guidelines and standards suggests that telemedicine is not yet near to routine use. If an international telemedicine organization were to take responsibility for defining guidelines, under the direction of clinicians with appropriate telemedicine experience, this might speed up their development.

Computer Communication Networks↗

PubMed2004

Evidence-based guidelines in laboratory medicine: principles and methods.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines are commonly used tools for supporting medical decisions. Formulating evidence-based recommendations has become a leading principle in guideline development. AIM: This narrative review integrates the most recent methods of evidence-based guideline development and adapts those to the field of laboratory medicine. SUMMARY: We present a 10-step process and a list of criteria for the development of laboratory guidelines. Laboratory guidelines should be outcome oriented, be developed by a multidisciplinary team, and begin with a clear statement of the clinical question(s) that the use of the test(s) is addressing. The clinical questions define the type of study designs that offer the best evidence to answer those questions. Guidelines should be based on the critical appraisal and systematic review of literature and explicitly state the strength of evidence supporting each recommendation. Pragmatic considerations dictate that priority is given to topics with the highest clinical or economic impact. Scientific evidence is necessary but insufficient for recommendations, as considered judgment is required about benefits, harms, costs, and local applicability of recommendations. Formal consensus methods are needed when the evidence base is lacking or controversial. Guidelines should be disseminated widely and their impact monitored regularly. Regular reviewing is needed because the lack of timely updates is a major cause of nonadherence to guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines should be developed in a transparent process by a multidisciplinary team, with graded recommendations based on critically appraised scientific studies. Systematic, standardized, and explicit methodology, adapted to laboratory medicine, should be followed when developing recommendations involving the use of laboratory tests.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques↗

PubMed2003

Evaluation of a practice guideline for noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical practice guidelines have been devised to change practitioner performance and to improve the process and outcomes of care. The objective of this study was to determine whether adherence to a practice guideline on noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) for the treatment of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) would change clinician behavior and resource utilization, and improve NPPV utilization and patient outcomes. DESIGN: Using a multidisciplinary team, we developed, implemented, and evaluated an NPPV practice guideline for ARF. Before and after guideline implementation, we recorded the incidence of endotracheal intubation (ETI) and mortality. Secondary outcomes were technological settings (ie, NPPV settings and duration) and NPPV administration (ie, cardiopulmonary monitoring, transfer to and time spent in the ICU, and pulmonary consultation). PARTICIPANTS: We enrolled 189 patients, 91 in the preguideline phase and 98 in the postguideline phase. Patients were similar in the both phases with respect to diagnoses at hospital admission and severity of illness. RESULTS: Of patients receiving NPPV for ARF, 67.3% fulfilled the guideline eligibility criteria in the postguideline phase compared to 62.6% in the preguideline phase (p = 0.543). Compared to the preguideline phase, more patients in the postguideline phase were transferred to the ICU (14.7% vs 33.7%, respectively; p = 0.003), spent more time in the ICU (30.9% vs 62.4%, respectively; p < 0.0001), and had consultation by a pulmonary physician (28.4% vs 49.0%, respectively; p = 0.004). There were no changes in technological settings. Guideline implementation was associated with improved cardiopulmonary monitoring. Nursing and respiratory therapist flow sheets were well-utilized during the guideline phase. There were no differences in ETI rates and mortality rates before and after guideline implementation. CONCLUSION: In this before-after study, we found that a multidisciplinary guideline for the use of NPPV for the treatment of patients with ARF was associated with changes in the process of care, with greater NPPV utilization in the ICU, and with increased pulmonary consultation, without any significant changes in the outcomes of care (ie, ETI and mortality rates).

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1999

Management of phenylketonuria for optimal outcome: a review of guidelines for phenylketonuria management and a report of surveys of parents, patients, and clinic directors.

OBJECTIVE: The development of guidelines for phenylketonuria (PKU) management in the United Kingdom has resulted in much discussion in the community of parents and PKU clinics and parents have asked why the United States does not have such guidelines. The objective of this report is to discuss PKU management in the United States, the British guidelines on PKU management, and the feasibility, suitability, and mechanism of developing PKU management guidelines in the United States. METHODS: Members of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Genetics (COG) reviewed the literature and conducted surveys of parents of children with PKU, young adults with PKU, and directors of PKU clinics in the United States. A meeting was held at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to review the AAP/COG efforts at reviewing the status of PKU management and guideline development in the United States. RESULTS: The British guidelines are more stringent than the PKU management practices in many parts of the United States. Evidence exists that stricter management improves developmental outcome. The parents who responded to the surveys indicated willingness to comply with more stringent dietary management if that would improve outcome. They also identified problems that make such management difficult. The clinic directors supported the timeliness of the review. Some had begun a trend toward more stringent control of blood phenylalanine concentrations, at least in the first 4 years of life. CONCLUSION: The AAP Committee on Genetics will complete its subject review of the management of PKU. Guidelines for care of PKU in the United States probably would look quite similar to the existing guidelines in other countries. The parents surveyed supported more stringent PKU management, but information from a broader distribution of parents would provide a more representative view. The status of the US health care system creates problems for improved PKU management in the United States that do not exist in the countries already following stricter guidelines.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Impact of globalization under the ICH guidelines on the conduct of reproductive toxicity studies--report on current status in Japan, Europe and the U.S. by questionnaire survey.

We surveyed interpretation of the ICH guidelines concerning reproductive toxicology. Valid responses were obtained from Japan (JPN), Europe (EUR) and the U.S. The results obtained were compared to those at the time of a previous survey targeted at JPN facilities in 1995-1996 as well as compared among all three regions. Compared to the previous survey in Japan, the number of facilities performing toxicokinetics (TK) in rats has slightly increased. This result was considered to represent changes of attitude toward TK in reproductive toxicity studies. Differences in interpretation of the guidelines between JPN, EUR and the US were widely seen. Clear differences were noted in sperm examinations, postnatal tests, fetal examinations, some examinations for F1 animals after culling and TK. Researchers in the West seemed to be interpreting the ICH guidelines more flexibly from the scientific point of view. JPN researchers appeared to interpret the guidelines, including notes, as rigid requirements. Most of the parts which produced different interpretations were the notes in the guidelines. The force of mention in the notes should be defined in the future. In addition, there were doubts about some parts, including notes, which had been found to have become unsuitable for the implementation of studies because of scientific progress or from long experience in using the guidelines. Therefore, updates of the guidelines may be needed in the future as well as the remedy of interpretation by JPN researchers. In JPN, the number of reproductive toxicity studies has decreased. The scanty experience in JPN therefore raises apprehension of appropriate selection and stagnating development of methodology, and might hinder the maintenance of the guidelines. In the future, the cooperation of CROs as well as global collaboration will be essential not only to scientific developments of reproductive toxicology but also updates of the guidelines.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

History and evolution of reproductive and developmental toxicology guidelines.

Birth defects and other adverse outcomes of pregnancy have been known since before the industrial age, but the need for guidelines to test chemicals to which pregnant women might be exposed was defined by the thalidomide tragedy in the 1950s and early 1960s. During the five decades that followed the tragedy, guidelines were written to test drugs, foods, and environmental contaminants. The guidelines were written to fulfill national needs, and then were expanded to international levels in order to streamline procedures in the expanding global economy. Multiple sets of animal guidelines were written, based on the need to simulate human experience. It was soon realized that the underlying principles were similar for all guidelines. Guidelines gradually evolved in two directions, in complexity and number of endpoints measured and in the expansion of internationally acceptable guidelines. This manuscript reviews, in chronological order, some of the milestones in the development of guidelines for animal studies and in the interpretations for safety assessment. Guidelines for long-term and short-term studies are reviewed, followed by a discussion of recently added endpoints and the future integration process for the assessment of reproductive toxicity risk.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Did publication of a clinical practice guideline recommendation to screen for type 2 diabetes in women with gestational diabetes change practice?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) were screened postpartum for type 2 diabetes according to the Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) guidelines. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The 1998 CDA guidelines recommend that all women diagnosed with GDM be screened postpartum for type 2 diabetes using a 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The impact of and compliance with this expert opinion-based recommendation is unknown. All women who delivered at the Ottawa Hospital in 1997 (pre-guideline) and 2000 (post-guideline) with confirmed GDM were identified. Using population-based administrative databases, we determined the proportion of these women who had an OGTT, serum glucose test, or glycated hemoglobin (GHb) test in the first postpartum year. Women who had not undergone any blood work were excluded. RESULTS: There were 131 women in 1997 and 123 women in 2000 with confirmed GDM. Of these, only 69 women in 1997 and 52 women in 2000 had blood work recorded in the database. None of these women had an OGTT performed in either period. We found a significant increase in the measurement of serum glucose (50 women pre-guideline [72.1%], 48 women post-guideline [92.3%], P < 0.05) and GHb (8 women pre-guideline [11.6%], 20 women post-guideline [38.5%], P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In our region, physicians are not following the CDA recommendations to screen women with GDM postpartum with an OGTT. However, we did find a significant increase in the measurement of serum glucose and GHb. Publication of expert opinion-based guidelines did not change the postpartum use of an OGTT in these women but may have increased the use of less reliable screening tests for type 2 diabetes.

Blood Glucose↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Implementation of international guidelines on hypertension: the Indian experience.

The WHO-ISH Guidelines on Hypertension have been introduced in India but their implementation has not been systematically studied. The process of implementation of international guidelines involves several steps: (a) recognition of the guidelines by the national opinion makers (b) acceptance, adaptation and adoption of the guidelines by the main change agents (c) initiation of guidelines in healthcare practice by the trend setters (d) advocacy of the guidelines by the influential change agents (e) dissemination of guidelines across various levels of health care and (f) diffusion into routine health care practice. The previous WHO-ISH Guidelines had inadequate impact due to limitations at each of these levels. The implementation of the new guidelines in developing countries, such as India, requires a concerted campaign of social marketing involving partnerships of key stakeholders.

Guidelines as Topic↗

PubMed2004

Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies.

OBJECTIVES: To undertake a systematic review of the effectiveness and costs of different guideline development, dissemination and implementation strategies. To estimate the resource implications of these strategies. To develop a framework for deciding when it is efficient to develop and introduce clinical guidelines. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Healthstar, Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, EMBASE, SIGLE and the specialised register of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group. REVIEW METHODS: Single estimates of dichotomous process variables were derived for each study comparison based upon the primary end-point or the median measure across several reported end-points. Separate analyses were undertaken for comparisons of different types of intervention. The study also explored whether the effects of multifaceted interventions increased with the number of intervention components. Studies reporting economic data were also critically appraised. A survey to estimate the feasibility and likely resource requirements of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies in UK settings was carried out with key informants from primary and secondary care. RESULTS: In total, 235 studies reporting 309 comparisons met the inclusion criteria; of these 73% of comparisons evaluated multifaceted interventions, although the maximum number of replications of a specific multifaceted intervention was 11 comparisons. Overall, the majority of comparisons reporting dichotomous process data observed improvements in care; however, there was considerable variation in the observed effects both within and across interventions. Commonly evaluated single interventions were reminders, dissemination of educational materials, and audit and feedback. There were 23 comparisons of multifaceted interventions involving educational outreach. The majority of interventions observed modest to moderate improvements in care. No relationship was found between the number of component interventions and the effects of multifaceted interventions. Only 29.4% of comparisons reported any economic data. The majority of studies only reported costs of treatment; only 25 studies reported data on the costs of guideline development or guideline dissemination and implementation. The majority of studies used process measures for their primary end-point, despite the fact that only three guidelines were explicitly evidence based (and may not have been efficient). Respondents to the key informant survey rarely identified existing budgets to support guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. In general, the respondents thought that only dissemination of educational materials and short (lunchtime) educational meetings were generally feasible within current resources. CONCLUSIONS: There is an imperfect evidence base to support decisions about which guideline dissemination and implementation strategies are likely to be efficient under different circumstances. Decision makers need to use considerable judgement about how best to use the limited resources they have for clinical governance and related activities to maximise population benefits. They need to consider the potential clinical areas for clinical effectiveness activities, the likely benefits and costs required to introduce guidelines and the likely benefits and costs as a result of any changes in provider behaviour. Further research is required to: develop and validate a coherent theoretical framework of health professional and organisational behaviour and behaviour change to inform better the choice of interventions in research and service settings, and to estimate the efficiency of dissemination and implementation strategies in the presence of different barriers and effect modifiers.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

PubMed2006

Pharmacotherapy implications of revised chronic heart failure guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of major drug therapy recommendations within recently revised chronic heart failure (CHF)guidelines. DATA SOURCES: Guideline statements and English-language articles from MEDLINE pertinent to CHF. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Recently published guidelines from the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) and the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) served as the focus of this review. Prospective comparative trials, review articles, and editorials were also considered. DATA SYNTHESIS: Recommendations within the ACC/AHA and HFSA guidelines continue to provide a systematic, evidence-based approach regarding CHF management. The HFSA guidelines recommend that the severity of clinical disease and functional limitation be characterized using the New York Heart association (NYHA) functional classification system. A key feature of the ACC/AHA guidelines is the use of a staging system that recognizes the development and progression of heart failure. Both guidelines stress the importance of neurohormonal blockade with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-adrenergic blockers. Moreover, the guidelines expand the role of aldosterone antagonists, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate, particularly in combination with standard treatments. Diuretics and digoxin remain symptomatic treatments only. CONCLUSIONS: This article summarizes key drug therapy recommendations from the revised ACC/AHA and HFSA guideline statements. Pharmacists caring for CHF patients should be familiar with these recommendations and aid in their implementation.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed2001

Lipid lowering and coronary heart disease risk: how appropriate are the national guidelines?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of current Australian guidelines for prescribing lipid-lowering drugs in identifying high-risk individuals in primary prevention of coronary heart disease. DESIGN AND SETTING: Coronary heart disease risk profiles were obtained for 280 consecutive patients dispensed lipid-lowering drugs in rural Victoria. Their 10-year absolute risk of coronary heart disease was determined using the Framingham formula. PATIENTS were categorised according to their eligibility for lipid-lowering drugs as defined by current Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and National Heart Foundation (NHF) guidelines. PATIENTS: Complete data were available for 230 patients dispensed lipid-lowering drugs. Of these, the 138 patients (60%) with no history of vascular disease are the subjects of our study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients with various 10-year coronary heart disease thresholds (15%, 20% and 30%), compared with their eligibility for lipid-lowering drugs based on Australian PBS and NHF guidelines. RESULTS: Twenty-six per cent of patients with no history of vascular disease who are currently dispensed lipid-lowering drugs do not fulfil PBS guidelines for treatment. Of patients conforming with PBS guidelines as suitable for lipid-lowering drugs, 39% (95% CI, 30%-49%) had a 10-year risk of coronary heart disease of less than 15%. A similar proportion (41% [95% CI, 32%-50%]) had a 10-year risk of coronary heart disease of less than 15%, but were eligible for lipid-lowering drugs according to NHF guidelines. Adherence to PBS and NHF guidelines in patients currently dispensed lipid-lowering drugs would result in as many as 14% (95% CI, 8%-21%) and 7% (95% CI, 3%-12%) of patients, respectively, not being eligible for treatment, despite having a 10-year risk of coronary heart disease greater than 15%. CONCLUSIONS: Australian guidelines for prescribing of lipid-lowering drugs are poor discriminators of absolute risk of coronary heart disease in primary prevention. Strategies based on the continuous relationship between risk-factor intensity and absolute coronary heart disease risk, such as the Framingham risk estimates, provide a more rational basis for formulating treatment guidelines.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Internists' attitudes about clinical practice guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: To assess internists' familiarity with, confidence in, and attitudes about practice guidelines issued by various organizations. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, self-administered survey. PARTICIPANTS: Questionnaires were mailed to a stratified random sample of 2600 members of the American College of Physicians (ACP) in 1992. Of the 2513 internists who met our eligibility criteria, 1513 responded (60%). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Familiarity with guidelines varied from 11% of responders for the ACP guideline on exercise treadmill testing to 59% of responders for the National Cholesterol Education Program guideline. Confidence was reported in ACP guidelines by 82% of responders but by only 6% for Blue Cross and Blue Shield guidelines. Subspecialists had greatest confidence in guidelines developed by their own subspecialty organizations. It was thought that guidelines would improve the quality of health care by 70% of responders, increase health care costs by 43%, be used to discipline physicians by 68%, and make practice less satisfying by 34%. More favorable attitudes were held by internists who were paid a fixed salary, saw patients for less than 20 hours per week, had recently graduated from medical school, or were not in private practice. CONCLUSIONS: Although most ACP members studied recognized the potential benefits of practice guidelines, many were concerned about possible effects on clinical autonomy, health care costs, and satisfaction with clinical practice.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed1995

Measuring and improving physician compliance with clinical practice guidelines. A controlled interventional trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine factors that may lead physicians not to comply with clinical practice guidelines. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of patients whose physicians were not compliant with discharge recommendations from a prospective, controlled interventional trial of a guideline to reduce hospital length of stay for patients admitted for chest pain. SETTING: A large community teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted with chest pain who were not discharged according to a practice guideline. RESULTS: 79 (34%) of 230 patients with chest pain classified as being at low risk by concurrent or retrospective review were not discharged by day 3 (the guideline recommendation). Of these 79 patients, 33 (42%) were misclassified at concurrent review (10 were falsely classified as being at high risk and 23 were falsely classified as being at low risk). Of 46 correctly classified patients, 11 (14%) were classified as having noncompliant physicians because of health care system inefficiencies. The status of 7 (9%) patients was changed to high risk between initial classification and potential discharge. For 15 patients (19%), no obvious reason for delayed discharge was found, but they had a higher severity of illness than did low-risk patients discharged according to the guideline as measured by mean time-insensitive predictive instrument scores (41.3% +/- [SD] 14.1% compared with 31.5% +/- 14.3%; P = 0.017). In 13 patients (16%), physicians refused to follow the guideline recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: In measuring and attempting to improve physician compliance with a length-of-stay guideline, physician refusal accounts for a small percentage (16%) of noncompliance. Implementation issues, health care system inefficiency, and severity of illness were the predominant reasons why physicians did not comply with guidelines. Our study further supports the principle that clinical practice guidelines should complement rather than be a substitute for physician judgment.

Chest Pain↗