Mediating and moderating effects of stress perception and situation type on coping responses in women with disordered eating.
Effects of stress perception and situation type on coping behavior were assessed in undergraduate females. Women with high (n=28) and low (n=28) Eating Attitudes Test (EAT) scores listened to audiotaped scenes representing two different situation types and two levels of stress. As predicted, the High EAT group rated scenes as more stressful and endorsed more of the maladaptive emotion-oriented coping, compared to the low EAT condition. Importantly, analyses revealed that stress perception mediated the relationship between group membership and emotion-oriented coping. Scene type appeared to moderate the effect of group on emotion-oriented coping. However, stress perception was shown to mediate, or account for, the moderating effect of situation type; a relationship termed mediated moderation. So although the two groups appeared to differ in the effect of situation type on coping, this apparent interaction effect can be attributed to differences in their perception of stress. Finally, women with High EAT scores did not exhibit a deficit in the more productive task-oriented coping behaviors, nor did they exhibit an avoidant coping style. In sum, the maladaptive coping used by women with disordered eating may represent characteristic emotional responses to exaggerated perceptions of stress and a preoccupation with issues specific to body image and food, rather than deficits in productive coping skills or an avoidant coping style.