PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Space Perception”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,099 records · Page 61Linked to original sources
PubMed1982

Contrast influence on perceived orientation.

When two gratings of slightly different orientation and equal contrast are presented dichoptically the observer perceives a unique fused grating at an orientation intermediate between the two (cyclofusion). We show here that if the contrast of the two gratings is different the perceived orientation of the fused grating depends on the relative contrast of the two monocular images. The results show that the perceived orientation varies linearly with the contrast difference, provided that the contrast values of the gratings presented to each eye are such as to give rise to a fused image. In these conditions, the perceived orientation is the average of the two monocular orientations, weighted with their contrast.

Depth Perception↗
PubMed1989

Detecting the displacements of spatial beats: no role for distortion products.

When two sinusoidal gratings of the same orientation and similar spatial frequency are summed, the resulting pattern has a periodic spatial variation or beat in contrast. Although the pattern contains no luminance modulation component at the beat frequency, it behaves in some respects as if it did: human observers for example are very good at detecting spatial displacements of the beat. We wished to test the possibility that a non-linearity in the visual system generates a component (a "distortion product") at the beat frequency, and that it is displacement of the distortion product that observers detect. Attempting to "null" the distortion product by adding to the beat pattern a sinusoidal component of the same spatial frequency as the distortion product but 180 deg out of phase with it does not impair performance in detecting motion of the beat; there is no nulling at any amplitude of the added component. Reducing the phase shift of the hypothetical distortion product by adding a static sinusoid to the moving beat pattern fails to produce the predicted fall in performance. These results suggest that distortion products do not contribute to our sensitivity to the displacement of beat patterns. Reversing the contrast of a beat pattern when it is displaced, slightly increases sensitivity to displacement, the same manipulation impairs performance with luminance patterns. This is consistent with the notion that the beat is detected as an unsigned local contrast signal.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1989

Visual cortical receptive fields in monkey and cat: spatial and temporal phase transfer function.

The response amplitude of simple cortical cells to spatiotemporal sine-wave patterns has been thoroughly documented in both cat and monkey. However, comparable measurements of response phase are not available even though phase measurements are essential for estimating the complete transfer function of a cell, and thus its spatiotemporal receptive field. This report describes a simple procedure for measuring both the amplitude and the phase transfer functions of striate cells. This technique was applied to 15 monkey and 27 cat simple cells. The spatiotemporal phase response functions were found to be adequately described by linear equations in four parameters. Both the amplitude and phase responses were found to satisfy several strong constraints implied by the class of linear quadrature models proposed recently in theories of biological motion sensitivity. Because the data satisfied these constraints, it was possible to determine four important receptive field properties from the phase data: the spatial symmetry, the temporal symmetry, the response latency, and the spatial position. The receptive fields were found to have a wide range of spatial symmetries, but a more narrow range of temporal symmetries. Spatiotemporal receptive fields reconstructed from complete transfer functions are used to illustrate some of the differences between direction selective and nondirection selective cells. Finally, the effects of linear and nonlinear mechanisms on amplitude, phase, and direction selective responses are considered.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Orientation discrimination for objects defined by relative motion and objects defined by luminance contrast.

A bar-shaped area within a pattern of random dots was demarcated by moving the dots within the bar at a velocity equal and opposite to the velocity of dots outside the bar. Orientation discrimination for this motion-defined dotted bar was compared with orientation discrimination for a contrast-defined dotted bar that was created by switching off all dots outside the bar. Orientation discrimination was approximately as acute (approx. 0.5 deg) for a motion-defined bar as for a contrast-defined dotted bar, provided that dot contrast and speed were both high. Furthermore, this 0.5 deg discrimination compares with the most acute values reported for sharp-edged lines and sinewave gratings. For the motion-defined bar discrimination fell off rapidly when dot contrast was reduced, but remained acute for the contrast-defined bar for a further reduction of 0.6 log units. Thus, there was a 4:1 range of contrasts over which discrimination had collapsed for the motion-defined bar but remained acute for the contrast-defined bar. For the motion-defined bar discrimination also fell off rapidly at low dot speeds, but was almost unaffected by speed for the contrast-defined bar. These findings bear on the question whether orientation of motion-defined and contrast-defined bars are analyzed by the same or by different neural mechanisms, and pose a challenge for current theories of orientation discrimination.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

The visible persistence of stimuli in stroboscopic motion.

This paper reports an improved paradigm to measure visible persistence. The stimulus is a pair of lines stroboscopically displayed in successive positions moving in opposite directions. The subjects' judgement of simultaneous appearance of all the presented lines is used to estimate visible persistence. This paradigm permitted independent manipulation of spatial and temporal stimulus separations in linear motion. The resulting estimates of visible persistence increase with spatial separation up to 0.24 deg of visual angle and approaches a maximum value at larger spatial separations. The results are consistent with the existence of a hypothetical visual gain mechanism that operates over small retinal distances to effectively decrease persistence duration with decreasing spatial separation.

Afterimage↗
PubMed1991

Conditions for the detection of coherent motion.

Previous studies have suggested that human motion perception involves at least two different detection stages: an orientation selective or component motion stage and a combination stage where selectivity to the coherent motion of a pattern, e.g. a plaid is established. These studies are inconclusive as to the motion detection process per se. Here we provide evidence that the motion detectors involved are of the correlation type. We determined critical values for the temporal and spatial modulation of the stimulus structure where the motion of the stimulus is no longer visible. Our results indicate that the spatial parameters of plaid- and component-motion detectors are identical but that the critical temporal modulation period is shorter for plaid-motion detectors. The results are discussed with respect to recent neurophysiological and psychophysical evidence for the two-stage motion detection model.

Humans↗
PubMed1992

Extrapolation of linear motion.

We investigated observers' ability to extrapolate a linear trajectory of a moving point, in order to determine how effectively the visual system can combine orientation and position information for moving stimuli. Observers saw a probe dot moving along a straight line toward a stationary target dot. The probe dot extinguished before reaching the target, and the observers' task was to judge whether an extrapolation of the trajectory of the probe would pass to the left or right of the target. Performance was measured as a function of probe velocity, length of the visible trajectory, and location of the target. The empirical results indicated that over a range of conditions, performance on this task is qualitatively similar to, but somewhat less accurate than, that on an analogous task with static stimuli. A four-component model is presented to account for the results. The model specifies an accurate extraction of probe motion parameters, extrapolation of the motion by an ideal observer, and limitations on the input to these processes in the form of visual field spatial inhomogeneity and temporal decay of position information.

Depth Perception↗
PubMed1992

Retinal speed gradients and the perception of surface slant.

Previous work has demonstrated a difference in human sensitivity to compressive and shearing speed gradients. This raises the possibility that the ability to estimate the slant of a surface may vary with its direction of tilt. No such variance was found here, which may indicate that slant estimation depends upon deformation rather than upon compression or shear.

Humans↗
PubMed1995

The role of exocentric reference frames in the perception of visual direction.

One classic piece of evidence for an efference copy signal of eye position is that a small, positive afterimage viewed in darkness is perceived to move with the eye. When a small stationary reference point is visible the afterimage appears to move relative to the reference point. However, this is true only when the afterimage is localized to a small area. We have observed that when an extended afterimage of a complex scene is generated by a brief, bright flash it does not appear to move, even with large changes in eye position. When subjects were instructed to maintain their direction of gaze, we observed small saccades (typically < 1 deg) and slow drift movements often totalling more than 10 deg over a 30 sec period. When the instructions were to simply inspect the extended afterimage, subjects made larger saccades (up to 5 deg) which were not accompanied by afterimage movement. The smaller movements observed under the first instructions are greater than those observed in the dark or with small afterimages. When a visible reference is present with these large afterimages, the afterimage appears stationary, while the reference point appears to move. Eye position was monitored following the generation of such afterimages. In general, the perceived motion of the stationary reference point was in a direction opposite to the motion of the eye. Similar drift movements of smaller magnitude were observed with localized afterimages, but the motion was attributed to the afterimage.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Afterimage↗