SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Guidelines”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,135 records · Page 63Linked to original sources

PubMed1997

Clinical guidelines for management.

Guidelines provide explicit recommendations and seek to influence practice using a formal process to disseminate advice on most effective management in the light of scientific evidence. They provide a framework for the evaluation and treatment of common clinical problems, but are not intended to replace clinical judgement. There is considerable variation in rheumatology practice, fueled by uncertainty about the optimal measurement of disease outcome. Guidelines can help identify and eliminate ineffective or unnecessary care as they are systematically developed statements to assist practitioners and patients' decisions about appropriate health care. There are North American guidelines for the initial evaluation of adult patients with acute musculoskeletal symptoms, the management of rheumatoid arthritis and the management of osteoarthritis. These are discussed together with proposed guidelines for the management of early rheumatoid arthritis and areas of research into the value of guidelines. It is recommended that future work in this area should: (i) identify aspects of current guidelines which are directly related to outcome; (ii) educate clinicians in these aspects of care; (iii) ensure they are introduced into practice and the outcome of care subsequently improves; (iv) regularly update the guidelines to reflect current opinion. Present guidelines that give broadly similar recommendations from North American and UK perspectives. However, the available evidence all points to large variations between how clinicians practise and how they make their decisions and it may be unlikely that laying down exact recipes for practice will necessarily influence the clinician. Guidelines may appear relevant but they could prove to have very limited utility.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗

PubMed2000

Lower limb occlusive arterial disease in the North of England: workload and development of management guidelines. The Northern Regional Vascular Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: in 1997 the vascular surgeons across the North of England commenced a study to examine various aspects of the management of lower limb occlusive arterial disease (LLOAD). Two aspects of this work were to assess workloads between hospitals and develop guideline parameters for managing intermittent claudication (IC) and critical limb ischaemia (CLI). The guidelines were to be developed, tested and modified by this study. METHOD: prospective inclusion of all patients admitted for investigation of LLOAD to nine hospitals by 19 surgeons over a period of 12 months. RESULTS: the hospitals admitted an average of 106 legs per 100 000 population (range 53-149) with LLOAD. Legs with IC (n=1351) were revascularised slightly less frequently than predicted (actual 76%, guideline 80%) and radiological treatment was used more frequently than predicted (radiology/surgery, actual 69/32%, guideline 40/60%). For limbs with CLI, revascularisation was undertaken more often (actual 70%, guideline 60%) and radiological intervention used more frequently (radiology/surgery, actual 45/58%, guideline 35/65%) than anticipated. Primary amputation, overall mortality and limb salvage were better than the predicted guidelines. CONCLUSION: large variations in workloads and clinical practice were observed between hospitals for the management of LLOAD. Developing guidelines for the management of limbs with IC was not considered appropriate, whereas suitable guidelines for legs with CLI were developed, tested and modified.

Amputation, Surgical↗

PubMed1990

Developing guidelines for client-centred occupational therapy practice.

The Canadian Guidelines for the client-centred practice of occupational therapy are national, generic, consensus guidelines developed to address growing concerns inside and outside the profession for assuring the quality of health services. From 1979 to 1987, successive Task Forces, sponsored by the Department of National Health and Welfare and the Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, developed three volumes of guidelines. A pivotal guideline in Volume I is a conceptual framework of occupational therapy's central concern: occupational performance within an individual's physical, cultural and social environment. Volume I also outlines stages in the process of client-centred occupational therapy practice, and specific assessment and program planning guidelines. Volume II covers issues, concepts and fundamental elements of intervention, as well as specific guidelines for intervention, discharge, follow-up and evaluation. Volume III reviews issues in outcome measurement given occupational therapy's primary concern for occupational performance. The authors, members of the Task Forces, provide an overview of the development of and their hopes for the Guidelines. Uses and influences of the Guidelines have not been formally documented. However, projects are arising from the Guidelines and a new CAOT Client-Centred Practice Committee is proposing an updating process for the three volumes.

Canada↗

PubMed2006

Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO), like many other organisations around the world, has recognised the need to use more rigorous processes to ensure that health care recommendations are informed by the best available research evidence. This is the third of a series of 16 reviews that have been prepared as background for advice from the WHO Advisory Committee on Health Research to WHO on how to achieve this. OBJECTIVE: In this review we address the composition of guideline development groups and consultation processes during guideline development. METHODS: We searched PubMed and three databases of methodological studies for existing systematic reviews and relevant methodological research. We did not conduct systematic reviews ourselves. Our conclusions are based on the available evidence, consideration of what WHO and other organisations are doing and logical arguments. KEY QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS: What should be the composition of a WHO-panel that is set up to develop recommendations? The existing empirical evidence suggests that panel composition has an impact on the content of the recommendations that are made. There is limited research evidence to guide the exact composition of a panel. Based on logical arguments and the experience of other organisations we recommend the following: Groups that develop guidelines or recommendations should be broadly composed and include important stakeholders such as consumers, health professionals that work within the relevant area, and managers or policy makers. Groups should include or have access to individuals with the necessary technical skills, including information retrieval, systematic reviewing, health economics, group facilitation, project management, writing and editing. Groups should include or have access to content experts. To work well a group needs an effective leader, capable of guiding the group in terms of the task and process, and capable of facilitating collaboration and balanced contribution from all of the group members. Because many group members will not be familiar with the methods and processes that are used in developing recommendations, groups should be offered training and support to help ensure understanding and facilitate active participation.What groups should be consulted when a panel is being set up?We did not identify methodological research that addressed this question, but based on logical arguments and the experience of other organisations we recommend that as many relevant stakeholder groups as practical should be consulted to identify suitable candidates with an appropriate mix of perspectives, technical skills and expertise, as well as to obtain a balanced representation with respect to regions and gender. What methods should WHO use to ensure appropriate consultations? We did not find any references that addressed issues related to this question. Based on logical arguments and the experience of other organisations we believe that consultations may be desirable at several stages in the process of developing guidelines or recommendations, including: Identifying and setting priorities for guidelines and recommendations, commenting on the scope of the guidelines or recommendations, commenting on the evidence that is used to inform guidelines or recommendations, commenting on drafts of the guidelines or recommendations, commenting on plans for disseminating and supporting the adaptation and implementation of the guidelines or recommendations, key stakeholder organisations should be contacted directly whenever possible, consultation processes should be transparent and should encourage feedback from interested parties.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2006

Medical staff guidelines for periviability pregnancy counseling and medical treatment of extremely premature infants.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this report is to describe the collaborative formation of rational, practical, medical staff guidelines for the counseling and subsequent care of extremely early-gestation pregnancies and premature infants between 22 and 26 weeks. The purposes of the guidelines were to improve knowledge regarding neonatal outcomes, to provide consistency in periviability counseling, and to promote informed, supportive, responsible choices. METHODS: To formulate the guidelines, a 5-step process was conducted; it began with a series of multidisciplinary meetings among maternal-fetal medicine specialists (MFMs), obstetricians, neonatologists, neonatal nurse practitioners, and nurses from both the labor and delivery unit and the NICU at Providence St Vincent Medical Center (Portland, OR). First, our discussions reviewed mortality rates, morbidity rates, and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes for extremely premature infants. Second, we explored the variations in counseling that pregnant women received, based on providers' individual beliefs and disparate knowledge of neonatal outcomes. Third, we asked participants to complete a survey that focused on the theoretical impending delivery of a premature infant, presenting at each week between 22 and 26 weeks of gestation. Participants indicated their recommendations for NICU care at each gestational age by using a numeric scale. Fourth, the survey results were tabulated and used as a basis for the formation of guidelines related to the recommended obstetric and neonatal care at each week of gestation. MFMs and neonatologists were urged to use these specific guidelines as a framework for counseling pregnant women between 22 and 26 weeks of gestation. Fifth, we surveyed women approximately 3 days after they were counseled by their MFM and neonatologist, to assess comprehension, utility, consistency, and comfort with the periviability counseling. RESULTS: Twenty pregnant women with the possibility of delivery between 22 and 26 weeks of gestation (mean: 24 weeks) received periviability counseling with our consensus medical staff guidelines. The respondents rated the counseling process as highly understandable (80%), useful (95%), consistent (89%), and performed in a comfortable manner (100%). All (100%) of the pregnant women thought they were given enough information to make critical decisions related to the potential level of care of their infant. CONCLUSIONS: Informative, supportive, clear, medical staff guidelines developed to assist in the counseling of women delivering extremely premature infants have been designed and implemented successfully at our hospital. These guidelines form the basis of periviability counseling, which is appreciated by our at-risk pregnant patients. We recommend that all hospitals that provide high-risk obstetric and neonatal intensive care develop similar consensus guidelines based on published outcomes and local provider experience.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Current status and future plans of Nuclear Medicine Procedure Guidelines in Central and Eastern European EANM member societies compared with those in other EANM member societies.

The main aim of the EANM Task Group on Quality Assurance and Standardisation is to develop harmonised clinical procedures that are accepted within Europe. In order to achieve an evidence-based analysis of guidelines this Task Group conducted a survey by means of a questionnaire in the 27 EANM member societies in July 1999, which investigated the current status of national guidelines in EANM member societies, specification of the cover and level of these national guidelines, and future desires for national, EANM and SNM guidelines. A reanalysis of the data of this survey was undertaken to evaluate the differences and similarities between 9 Central and Eastern European (CEE) EANM member societies and 18 non-CEE (mainly Western European) EANM member societies with regard to the aforementioned investigated topics. The results of this reanalysis show only minor differences between CEE and non-CEE EANM member societies with regard to the aforementioned topics. Both in CEE and in non-CEE EANM member societies, there is limited coverage of existing guidelines, leaving most procedures uncovered. Although the infrastructure for guideline development is present in both groups, the main explanation for this similarity is the limited advancement of the guideline development process, in both the CEE and non-CEE EANM member societies. Both groups are willing and ready for guideline development at the EANM level, with more concordant than discordant reasons for this. This allows a synchronous implementation of procedure guidelines in CEE EANM member societies.

Editorial↗

PubMed2004

Looking inside the 2003 CDC dental infection control guidelines.

On Dec. 19, 2003, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published updated infection control guidelines for dentistry. The guidelines provide comprehensive information on all aspects of dental infection control. The recommendations are designed to prevent or reduce the potential for disease transmission from patient to dental health care personnel, from dental health care personnel to patient, and from patient to patient. Most recommendations will be familiar and are already practiced routinely. This article highlights major updates and additions in the CDC guidelines and provides additional information to assist readers in applying the latest guidelines. Almost a year ago, the CDC and Prevention published updated dental infection control guidelines in a supplement to the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. The Guidelines for Infection Control in Dental Health Care Settings--2003 represent a collaborative effort between leading experts in infection control from other federal agencies, public health, and hospital epidemiology and infection control. Unlike regulatory agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the CDC cannot mandate certain practices; it can only recommend. However, the CDC is recognized as the nation's disease prevention agency and develops a broad range of guidelines intended to improve health care and to inform clinicians and the public. As a result, many dental licensing boards adopt CDC's recommendations, or variations of them, as the infection control standard for dental practice in their states. In contrast to the 1986 and 1993 CDC dental infection control recommendations, the 2003 CDC publication includes more background information and the scientific rationale for the recommendations. Also, readers will notice that each recommendation has a rank assigned to it categorizing the recommendation on the basis of existing scientific data, theoretical rationale, and applicability (Table 1). Most recommendations will be familiar and already are practiced routinely. As with previous CDC recommendations, the guidelines are designed to prevent or reduce the potential for disease transmission from patient to dental health care personnel; from dental health care personnel to patient, and from patient to patient. The following is an overview highlighting major updates and additions in the 2003 CDC guidelines. It is not intended to be a comprehensive review. Readers can access the complete document (Figure 1) by visiting www.cdc.gov/oralhealth/ infectioncontrol.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.↗

PubMed1990

[Inventory and comparison of guidelines for antibiotic utilization in Dutch hospitals].

In 1976 the Dutch Health Council advised hospitals to formulate guidelines for use of antibiotics. These guidelines and their use should improve the quality of care in terms of medical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. In 1988 the Peer Review Council held a survey among all (140) Dutch hospitals to collect data about these guidelines. Thirty-seven sets of guidelines used in 71 hospitals were obtained. We analysed these sets of guidelines as to the following general aspects: the status of the guidelines in the hospitals, the problem-oriented approach, the topics dealt with in the guidelines and the authors of the guidelines. Four specific aspects related to rational use of antibiotics were analysed as well: the use of cephalosporin, the use of different antibiotics for prophylaxis and therapy and the cost-effectiveness of antibiotic treatment in relation to urosepsis. Results of these analyses show that guidelines are too often formulated in a noncommittal way and that there is a need for a more functional registration system to link information about the clinical working diagnoses, the bacteria isolated and the sensitivity to the antibiotics used. These linkages are essential for feedback to clinicians, microbiologists and pharmacists and a prerequisite for management of the quality of care with respect to use of antibiotics.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed2001

Impact of a guideline-based disease management team on outcomes of hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Congestive heart failure is the most common reason for hospitalization in the United States, and guidelines to improve the quality of care for patients with congestive heart failure have been developed. However, adherence is typically low. We hypothesized that a guideline-based care management team would result in greater quality and efficiency of care than guidelines alone. METHODS: A faculty cardiologist and nurse care manager at an academic medical center reviewed each patient's data and made guideline-based recommendations. Hospital length of stay, total costs, and use of recommended guidelines were compared between 173 patients before team implementation but with available guidelines, 283 care-managed patients, and 126 concurrent non-care-managed patients. RESULTS: Care-managed patients achieved higher rates of use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor than baseline or non-care-managed patients (95%, 60%, and 75%, respectively; P<.001), as well as increased adherence to guidelines for daily weight monitoring and assessment of left ventricular function. Hospital length of stay was lower (median, 3, 4, and 5 days, respectively; P<.001) as were costs of hospitalization (median, $2934, $3209, and $4830, respectively; P<.01). These differences persisted after adjustment for severity of illness. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with dissemination of guidelines alone, an active care management approach was associated with significant improvements in quality and efficiency of care for hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Development, implementation and prospective evaluation of guidelines for transfer of severely injured children to specialist centres.

BACKGROUND: Most injured children are appropriately treated at a district general hospital (DGH), but some require transfer to a specialist centre. The objectives of this study were to develop, implement and evaluate triage guidelines for the rapid recognition of injured children who require transfer. METHODS: This was a prospective, interventional cohort study of the 592 seriously injured children who presented to five regional DGHs during a 51-month period. A multispecialty steering group representing all participating DGHs developed and implemented the guidelines. Data were collected for 24 months before the guidelines were introduced, over the 3-month implementation period and for 24 months afterwards. Outcome measures were referral and management patterns before and after introduction of the guidelines. RESULTS: For level I (unstable) patients, after the implementation of guidelines there was a 29 per cent increase in the proportion of transfers to a specialist centre (from 40 (68 per cent) of 59 to 32 (97 per cent) of 33; P = 0.003), no admissions to a DGH intensive care unit and all 12 operations were performed at a specialist centre. Guideline users indicated that they were familiar with the guidelines. CONCLUSION: The introduction of triage guidelines within an effective communication network was associated with changes in the management of severely injured children.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Evaluation of an enhanced approach to the dissemination of the North American Guidelines for Children's Agricultural Tasks: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The North American Guidelines for Children's Agricultural Tasks were developed to assist farm parents in assigning developmentally appropriate and safe work to children aged 7 to 16 years. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of the standard dissemination strategy with an enhanced, multiphased, dissemination approach in influencing parents to use/apply North American Guidelines for Children's Agricultural Tasks when assigning farm work to their children. METHODS: A multisite-randomized trial was performed. During 1999, 498 farms in Canada and the United States were enrolled. Enhanced dissemination activities included the provision of a video, personalized child development information, and supportive telephone calls. Follow-up with all farms occurred during the fall of 2000 to assess parental reaction to North American Guidelines for Children's Agricultural Tasks and to determine whether North American Guidelines for Children's Agricultural Tasks were actually used. RESULTS: Proportions of parents who were actively using North American Guidelines for Children's Agricultural Tasks at 15 months were 108/218 (49.5%) and 83/224 (37.1%) in the experimental and control groups, respectively (difference: 12.5%, 95% CI: 3.4, 21.7). Parental knowledge of the content of North American Guidelines for Children's Agricultural Tasks was also increased in the enhanced dissemination group. CONCLUSION: These results have important implications for dissemination of the North American Guidelines for Children's Agricultural Tasks resources. An enhanced dissemination strategy appears to increase the likelihood that North American Guidelines for Children's Agricultural Tasks will be used by farm parents.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

The impact of evidence-based guideline dissemination for the assessment and treatment of major depression in a managed behavioral health care organization.

This study tests whether a managed behavioral health care organization can influence adherence to practice guidelines for the treatment of major depression in a randomized trial of guideline dissemination. Guidelines were disseminated to mental health clinicians (N = 443) under one of three conditions: (1) a general mailing of guidelines to clinicians, (2) a mailing in which guidelines were targeted to a patient starting treatment with the clinician, and (3) no mailing of guidelines. The results showed no effects of guideline dissemination as measured by self-report of patients and clinicians and through episode characteristics derived from claims data, despite sentinel effects. Results also showed high rates of clinician-reported guideline adherence that were not detected in the claims data, indicating significant undertreatment of depression. Results suggest that mental health systems must look to other dissemination strategies to improve adherence to standards of care and raise the performance of independent practicing clinicians.

Benchmarking↗

PubMed2004

Effects of guideline-concordant antimicrobial therapy on mortality among patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

PURPOSE: National practice guidelines have recommended specific initial empiric antimicrobial regimens for patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Our aim was to determine the association between the use of guideline-concordant antimicrobial therapy and 30-day mortality in patients with pneumonia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at two tertiary teaching hospitals. Eligible patients were admitted with a diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia, had a chest radiograph consistent with pneumonia, and had a discharge diagnosis of pneumonia. All eligible patients were identified and a random sample was abstracted. We determined whether the use of guideline-concordant antibiotics was associated with 30-day mortality in an analysis that adjusted for potential confounders using propensity scores. RESULTS: Information was obtained on 420 patients with pneumonia. The mean (+/- SD) age was 63 +/- 16 years, 355 were men, and 82 patients were initially admitted to the intensive care unit. At 30 days after presentation, 41 patients (9.8%) had died: 21 of 97 (21.7%) in the non-guideline-concordant group and 20 of 323 (6.2%) in the guideline-concordant group. Antibiotics were concordant with national guidelines in 323 patients. In the regression analysis, after adjustment for the propensity score, failure to comply with antimicrobial therapy guidelines was associated with increased 30-day mortality (odds ratio = 5.7; 95% confidence interval: 2.0 to 16.0). CONCLUSION: Receipt of antimicrobial regimens concordant with national published guidelines may reduce 30-day mortality among patients hospitalized with pneumonia.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Impact of guideline-concordant empiric antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the impact of guideline-concordant empiric antibiotic therapy on time to clinical stability, time to switch therapy, length of hospital stay, and mortality among patients with community-acquired pneumonia. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all adult community-acquired pneumonia patients managed at 5 community hospitals from November 1, 1999 to April 30, 2000. Patients were stratified into guideline-concordant and discordant groups as defined by the 2001 American Thoracic Society and the 2003 Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. Time to clinical stability, time to switch therapy, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality were evaluated in per-protocol and intention-to-treat stepwise regression models that included the outcome as the dependent variable, guideline-concordant antibiotic therapy as the independent variable, and Pneumonia Severity Index score as a covariate. RESULTS: Of the 631 evaluable patients, 357 (57%) received guideline-concordant empiric antibiotic therapy. Groups were similar with respect to age, sex, comorbidities, severity of illness, and processes of care. Guideline-concordant antibiotic therapy was associated with a significant decrease in time to switch therapy (P < or =.01), length of hospital stay (P < or =.01), and in-hospital mortality (P=.04) for both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses. In addition, guideline-concordant antibiotic therapy was associated with a significant decrease in time to clinical stability for intention-to-treat analysis only (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitalized community-acquired patients, guideline-concordant antibiotic therapy is associated with improved in-hospital survival and shorter time to clinical stability, time to switch therapy, and length of hospital stay.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Adherence to guidelines when positioning the defibrillation electrodes.

BACKGROUND: Placement of the defibrillation electrodes affects the transmyocardial current and thus the success of a defibrillation attempt. In the international guidelines 2000, the placement of the apical electrode was changed more laterally to the mid-axillary line. Finnish national guidelines, based on the international guidelines, were published in 2002. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine to what extent health care professionals adhere to the new guidelines when positioning the electrodes. METHODS: Professionals were recruited from emergency medical services, university hospitals and primary care. Not revealing the purpose of the test, participants were asked to place self-adhesive electrodes on a manikin as they would do in the resuscitation situation and to answer a questionnaire about resuscitation training and familiarity with the guidelines. The distance of electrodes from the recommended position was measured in horizontal and vertical planes. RESULTS: One-hundred and thirty six professionals participated in the study, and only 25.4% (95% CI 18.5-32.9) of them placed both electrodes within 5 cm from the recommended position. The majority of the participants placed the apical electrode too anteriorly. Of the participants, 36.0% were not aware of the new guidelines. Awareness of the guidelines did not increase the accuracy in electrode placement. CONCLUSIONS: The publication of the national evidence based resuscitation guidelines did not seem to have influenced the practice of placement of the defibrillation electrodes to any major extent. The correct placement of the electrodes needs be emphasized more in the resuscitation training.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed1998

Can practice guidelines safely reduce hospital length of stay? Results from a multicenter interventional study.

BACKGROUND: Although practice guidelines about appropriate lengths of stay have been widely promulgated, their effects on patient outcomes are not clear. Our objective was to study the effects of length of stay practice guidelines on patient outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective, nonrandomized, interventional trial in six geographically distributed hospitals, among consecutively hospitalized "low-risk" patients with total hip replacement, hip fracture, or knee replacement. Case managers provided physicians with patient risk information based on guideline recommendations. We measured length of stay, compliance with recommended guideline length of stay, health status, hospital readmission rates, return to emergency department, return to work and recreation, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 560 patients were included in the study. For patients with knee replacement, there was a statistically significant increase in practice guideline compliance (27% baseline versus 53% intervention, P <0.0001) and reduction in length of stay (5.2 days versus 4.6 days, P <0.001) when compared with the baseline period. For hip replacement patients, there similarly was an increase in practice guideline compliance (66% baseline versus 82% intervention, P = 0.01) and reduction in length of stay (5.1 days versus 4.8 days, P = 0.03). Significant reductions in length of stay were not observed for patients recovering after hip fracture despite a significant increase in guideline compliance. There were few statistically significant changes in patient outcomes related to reductions in lengths of stay, including health status, hospital readmission rates, return to emergency department, return to work and recreation, and patient satisfaction. For patients undergoing hip replacement, very short lengths of stay (shorter than the guideline recommendation) were associated with an increased rate of discharging patients to nursing homes and rehabilitation facilities (21% versus 7%, P = 0.01), and hip fracture patients with very short lengths of stay required more visits to the doctor after discharge (56% versus 25%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Reductions in lengths of stay were most often associated with no significant change in patient outcomes. However, very short lengths of stay were associated with increased intensity of care following discharge for patients undergoing hip surgery, indicating possible cost shifting (the cost incurred by transferring patients to rehabilitation facilities may have been greater than had the patients remained in the acute care hospital for an additional 1 or 2 days and been sent directly home). These results emphasize the importance of monitoring the effects of cost containment and other systematic efforts to change patient care at the local level.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Assessing conformance to medication treatment guidelines for schizophrenia in a community mental health center (CMHC).

The feasibility of implementing current medication treatment guidelines in a community mental health clinic was examined in this cross-sectional and retrospective study. Specifically, two issues were addressed: 1) could we identify a set of clinical guidelines whose utilization could be monitored with a routine medical chart review; and 2) were the requisite data for such a review available in the medical records. An examination of three sets of published guidelines revealed 5 specific guidelines that could be operationalized and monitored. Records were reviewed for a random sample of two-thirds of all patients currently diagnosed with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder (n = 309). Information was collected from the medical record on patient demographics, diagnosis, duration of illness, symptoms and side effects, and medication information. Rates of conformance to the 5 guidelines ranged from a high of 97% to a low of 43%. The use of current guidelines to improve treatment in community clinics appears to be limited by the deficiencies in the medical record and the structure of the guidelines themselves. Standardized progress notes and computerized prescribing programs will improve conformance, and permit the rapid and accurate assessment of conformance to guidelines in community clinics.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Do locally agreed guidelines for optometrists concerning the referral of glaucoma suspects influence referral practice?

PURPOSE: To assess whether the issuing of local guidelines for glaucoma detection including a protocol for the referral of suspects can improve the quality and accuracy of referrals from optometrists. METHODS: Universally agreed guidelines, which included a protocol for referring glaucoma suspects, were circulated to all optometrists in the catchment area of a major teaching hospital ophthalmic unit. Data on 207 new patients referred to one glaucoma clinic were collected from GOS18 forms and hospital records covering two 12 month periods spanning the guideline dissemination. Referral accuracy was calculated and the reasons for protocol violations and referral of normal individuals were determined. Where possible, data were compared with a similar study relating to referrals made to the same clinic in 1988 and 1993. RESULTS: The mean (SD) intraocular pressure (IOP) at which optometrists referred patients was 22.5 (6.6) in 1997 and 21.9 mmHg (6.6) in 1998/9, both significantly less than in 1988. A statistically significant upward trend with time was found in the number of patients referred with an assessment of cup/disc ratio and in those with details of a visual field assessment. The overall 'true positive diagnosis' was 40% (42/105) in 1997 and 32.3% (33/102) in 1998/9 after the guidelines (p = 0.32), both of which were significantly lower than the 1988 rate of 56% (34/75) (p = 0.03 and 0.003). Fifty per cent of false positive referrals in both 1997 and 1998/9 were associated with an assessment by the optometrist of the optic disc(s) that was at variance with the ophthalmologist's. False positive visual fields were associated with 22% and 35% of non-true positive referrals in 1997 and 1998/9. Protocol violations were observed in 48% of referrals after the guidelines had been disseminated. When the referral was both a false positive and the guideline protocol was not followed, 88% of violations were associated with IOP measurement in 1997 and 73% in 1998/9. The equivalent figures for visual field violations were 70% in 1997 and 76% in 1998/9. Normal individuals referred as suspects were significantly (p = 0.001) less likely to be referred on IOP grounds if their optometrist followed the referral protocol. CONCLUSION: Local dissemination of glaucoma screening guidelines with a protocol for referral did not appear to improve the diagnostic accuracy of optometrists in our area. Optometrists who follow the guidelines refer fewer normal individuals on IOP grounds, but false positive visual fields and optic disc interpretation difficulties remain a factor in such referrals. Additional strategies will be necessary to improve the quality and accuracy of referrals for suspect glaucoma by optometrists.

Aged↗