PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Aqueous Humor”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,189 records · Page 66Linked to original sources

[Effect of nonspecific and cardioselective beta receptor blockers on the formation of aqueous humor. An oculopressure tonometry study].

The aim of the present study was to show the effect of different topical beta-blocking agents on aqueous humor formation with a clinically practicable method. In a clinical, randomized, prospective double-blind study, 60 healthy volunteers were examined by means of oculopression tonometry according to Ulrich. The placebo was applied to 29 subjects; a nonselective beta-blocker (timolol maleate 0.5%) was given to 14 volunteers and 17 subjects received a cardioselective, beta-1-blocking agent (betaxolol-HCl 0.5%). On the 1st day, intraocular pressure (IOP) was lowered by the suction cup method and then we measured the time required for IOP to return to the initial value. The examination procedure of the 1st day was repeated on the 2nd day 3 h after application of the ophthalmic solution. After evaluation of the different groups, we could show that the recovery times in the placebo groups were comparable. Furthermore, we showed that both beta-blockers slow down the increase of IOP to the initial value. There was a statistically significant difference in recovery time between timolol and placebo. This difference was statistically not significant between betaxolol and placebo.

Adult↗

Concentrations of mitomycin C in rabbit corneal tissue and aqueous humor after topical administration.

PURPOSE: To study the aqueous and corneal pharmacokinetics of mitomycin C (MMC) after single topical administration to the central cornea and to evaluate the effects of different concentrations and different application times on the aqueous concentration of MMC. METHODS: Mechanical epithelium debridement of the central 7.5 mm of the cornea was performed in New Zealand white rabbits, and a sponge soaked in 0.02% MMC solution was placed on the denuded corneal stroma for 2 minutes. Aqueous fluid and central corneal tissues samples were taken at 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 hours thereafter. MMC concentration of the samples was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography and evaluated at different exposure times (range: 15-120 seconds) and concentrations of applied MMC (range: 0.005%-0.04%). RESULTS: Peak corneal concentration was 3.728 +/- 2.547 microg/g at 30 minutes after topical administration. Maximum aqueous concentration was 0.380 +/- 0.038 microg/mL at 1 hour after topical application. The aqueous concentration of MMC increased in a dose-dependent manner with increasing exposure time and application concentration. Aqueous MMC concentration increased at a higher rate with change of applied concentration than with exposure time. CONCLUSION: Good penetration of MMC through central bare cornea may be noxious to endothelial cells. Reducing concentration or decreasing exposure time seems a good modality to reduce potential MMC toxicity.

Administration, Topical↗

Measurement of the rate of aqueous humor flow.

Techniques which estimate the rate of aqueous flow generally require the use of tracer substances. Determination of the distribution of the tracer in the relevant body compartments permits calculation of the rate of flow within the limits of accuracy of the method used. The underlying theory, as well as the advantages and limitations of methods employing systemic, topical, intracameral, and intravitreal administration of tracer substances are reviewed. Since these methods all assume that the rate of aqueous secretion is constant, yet the presence of a diurnal rhythm of flow has been demonstrated in both rabbits and humans, a compartmental model of a circadian system based upon the vitreous depot technique is presented. This model estimates the degree to which a continuously changing rate of aqueous flow limits the ability to determine aqueous flow rate accurately by this particular method and illustrates this limitation, which is common to all tracer methods.

Animals↗