PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Biological Evolution”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,189 records · Page 66Linked to original sources

Evolving views of viral evolution: towards an evolutionary biology of viruses.

Despite considerable interest in viral evolution, at least among virologists, viruses are rarely considered from the same evolutionary vantage point as other organisms. Early work of necessity emphasized phenotype and phenotypic variation (and therefore arguably was more oriented towards the broader biological and ecological perspectives). More recent work (essentially since the development of molecular evolution in the 1960's but beginning earlier) has concentrated on genotypic variation, with less clarity about the significance of such variations. Other aspects of evolutionary theory, especially considerations of natural selection and of evolutionary constraints, have not widely been applied to viruses, and an evolutionary framework for virology has long been lacking. This becomes apparent in considering 'emerging' viruses, which have often been treated on an ad hoc basis. It was often felt that, because previously unrecognized viruses are involved, mechanisms of viral emergence must mirror the unpredictability of mutations in the viral genome. However, most examples of viral emergence are independent of mutation, at least initially, and are often pre-existing viruses in changed circumstances ('viral traffic'). This conclusion also readily follows from ordinary Darwinian premises, which would require that, like other living species, 'new' organisms are descended only from existing species. In this respect, from a Darwinian perspective, viruses would appear to resemble other organisms.

Biological Evolution↗

Perspective: is human cultural evolution Darwinian? Evidence reviewed from the perspective of the Origin of Species.

The claim that human culture evolves through the differential adoption of cultural variants, in a manner analogous to the evolution of biological species, has been greeted with much resistance and confusion. Here we demonstrate that as compelling a case can now be made that cultural evolution has key Darwinian properties, as Darwin himself presented for biological evolution in The Origin of Species. Culture is shown to exhibit variation, competition, inheritance, and the accumulation of successive cultural modifications over time. Adaptation, convergence, and the loss or change of function can also be identified in culture. Just as Darwin knew nothing of genes or particulate inheritance, a case for Darwinian cultural evolution can be made irrespective of whether unitary cultural replicators exist or whether cultural transmission mechanisms are well understood.

Adaptation, Biological↗

The influence of multiple inseminations and multiple foundresses on social evolution.

The breeding biology of a population determines the way in which individuals are distributed within and between progeny groups and, thus, affects the genetic variation within and between these groups. The breeding biology of any organism can be characterized by the distribution of the numbers of mates of females, the apportionment of paternity among males, the distribution of the numbers of females reproducing in common nests, and the apportionment of total fecundity within a nest among founding females. In addition, the possibility of genetic correlations among mates or among founding females is an important consideration and will be addressed in a later paper. The influence of the breeding biology on social evolution was evaluated by deriving the necessary conditions for the spread of genes for social behaviors and the rate of spread of these genes for populations with different breeding biologies. The first step in this derivation is to demonstrate that selection for genes determining social behavior can be represented as the covariance between gene frequency and relative fitness. Secondly, it is shown that this covariance can be formally partitioned into within and between group components. Thirdly, each covariance component is shown to be equivalent to the product of a genetic variance and a coefficient of linear regression of relative fitness on gene frequency. Lastly, specific models for the genotype fitnesses and breeding biologies are assumed and the necessary conditions for the increase in the frequency of altruistic alleles are obtained. The theory illustrates that variation in the numbers of mates per female has less of an effect on the evolution of social behaviors than does variation in the numbers of reproductive females per nest. In addition, it points out that the harmonic mean number of mates per female or of females per nest is a more useful summary statistic for characterizing populations with respect to the expected degree of evolved sociality than is the arithmetic mean.

Alleles↗

The evolution and understanding of hierarchical complexity in biology from an algebraic perspective.

We develop the rigorous notion of a model for understanding state transition systems by hierarchical coordinate systems. Using this we motivate an algebraic definition of the complexity of biological systems, comparing it to other candidates such as genome size and number of cell types. We show that our complexity measure is the unique maximal complexity measure satisfying a natural set of axioms. This reveals a strong relationship between hierarchical complexity in biological systems and the area of algebra known as global semigroup theory. We then study the rate at which hierarchical complexity can evolve in biological systems assuming evolution is "as slow as possible" from the perspective of computational power of organisms. Explicit bounds on the evolution of complexity are derived showing that, although the evolutionary changes in hierarchical complexity are bounded, in some circumstances complexity may more than double in certain "genius jumps" of evolution. In fact, examples show that our bounds are sharp. We sketch the structure where such complexity jumps are known to occur and note some similarities to previously identified mechanisms in biological evolutionary transitions. We also address the question of, How fast can complexity evolve over longer periods of time? Although complexity may more than double in a single generation, we prove that in a smooth sequence of t "inclusion" steps, complexity may grow at most from N to (N + 1)t + N, a linear function of number of generations t, while for sequences of "mapping" steps it increases by at most t. Thus, despite the fact that there are major transitions in which complexity jumps are possible, over longer periods of time, the growth of complexity may be broken into maximal intervals on which it is bounded above in the manner described.

Animals↗

Cross-scale information processing in evolution, development and intelligence.

Biological systems are treated as percolation networks in which processes at all scales participate. Macroscopic inputs are transduced to microphysical events through an interleaved hierarchy of structures and processes and microphysical events are amplified to control macroscopic structures and functions. Integrity and adaptation are achieved through self-consistency dynamics operating at all levels of organization. The unmanifest structure of the vacuum plays a vital role in these dynamics.

Biological Evolution↗

A classification of possible routes of Darwinian evolution.

A classification of four possible routes of Darwinian evolution is presented. These are serial direct evolution, parallel direct evolution, elimination of functional redundancy, and adoption from a different function. This classification provides a conceptual framework within which to investigate the accessibility by Darwinian evolution of complex biological structures.

Animals↗

JMATING: a software for the analysis of sexual selection and sexual isolation effects from mating frequency data.

BACKGROUND: Many different sexual isolation and sexual selection statistics have been proposed in the past. However, there is no available software that implements all these statistical estimators and their corresponding tests for the study of mating behaviour. RESULTS: JMATING is an easy-to-use program developed in Java for the analysis of mating frequency data to study sexual selection and sexual isolation effects from laboratory experiments as well as descriptive studies accomplished in the wild. The software allows the re-organization of the data previous to the analysis, the estimation of the most important estimators, and a battery of complementary statistical tests. CONCLUSION: JMATING is the first complete and versatile software for the analyses of mating frequency data. It is available at http://www.uvigo.es/webs/c03/webc03/XENETICA/XB2/JMsoft.htm and requires the Java runtime environment.

Animals↗

The value of a prophage-borne defense system in phage-phage competition.

Temperate phages that incorporate into their bacterial hosts' genomes often encode defense systems that protect their hosts from superinfection by unrelated phages. Yet the evolutionary value of such defenses to the phage remains unclear. We present a minimal theoretical framework to quantify the selective advantage of a prophage-borne defense system in competition between temperate phages infecting the same bacterial host. The model reveals regimes in which a "defensive phage" can invade and persist despite growth costs, regimes of bistability, and others in which all phage types coexist due to a rock-paper-scissors-like dynamic between defensive, non-defensive, and defense-loss variants. Because defense systems can be non-transitive, true rock-paper-scissors relations can lead to persistent oscillations. These results identify simple conditions under which phage-encoded defense systems are evolutionarily stable, providing testable predictions for the prevalence and maintenance of these systems in natural microbial communities.

Prophages↗

[Biological limits of exposure: evolution of interpretative and methodologic criteria].

Biological monitoring is an extremely efficient investigation tool in evaluation of exposure to exogenous substances, in both occupational and environmental settings. However, although biological tests have been widely acclaimed as the ideal approach to or as a completion of environmental measurements, they have had difficulty in becoming firmly established due to a number of limitations of various nature. Besides the numerous uncertainties in the set-up phase, which depend on the choice of indicators or criteria for their use, difficulties are still incurred in making a univocal interpretation of the results. These difficulties are due to the limited pharmaco-kinetic information available on the various substances and to the wide variability in individual biological response. The possibility of extrapolating Biological Exposure Limits (BELs) from the corresponding TLV-TWA, by means of calculations based on the experimental regressions observed between internal and external dose indices, has up to now been considered a dubious operation from a formal point of view and merely indicative for practical purposes. This paper examines the possibility of establishing BELs that are fixed taking account of the influence of the various biological variables, thus permitting a more correct, objective and generalised use of biological indicators in current practice. From the regression function and relative tolerance limits, intended as a range of values within which regression values can be expected to be found with a probability that can be fixed a priori, it is possible to calculate 3 BEL values for each environmental TLV-TWA concentration. The question of which of these different values should be selected as a BEL for practical purposes must be solved on the basis of a series of observations related to the type of investigation being performed and the context in which the results are to be used. It should be emphasized that each BEL value has its own particular sensitivity and specificity, i.e., the possibility of correctly classifying the exposure conditions in relation to the environmental values. If sensitivity and specificity values are known, it is possible to calculate the predictive value of the biological measurements compared to the environmental measurements; if numerical data on these parameters are available, account can be taken of the variability of the results in a rigourously scientific manner.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Air Pollutants, Occupational↗

Collective specification of cellular development.

Studies of chimeras and in vivo development demonstrate that cell lineages are often quite variable, apparently in response to chance perturbations. This points to an apparent contradiction: although individual cells are the units of genetic information and differentiation, not all cellular events need be precise for the development of functional organisms. The social organization of ants can serve as a metaphor that helps understand the mechanisms that underlie such development. Ants suggest that continued cellular interactions and environmental conditions could specify the proportion and general location of specialized units. Leaf venation is used as a concrete example of this general principle. A signal produced continuously by all cells specifies a requirement for vein differentiation. The cells that respond by differentiation then transport the signal away from the leaf; this removal acting as a feedback indicating that the requirement is being met. Because transport increases during vein differentiation, early initiation occurs in excess and vein 'competition' for the signal assures an acceptable outcome. Such specification would be robust since it does not depend on events in any single cell, and chance events, rather than being corrected or reversed, may be built upon in reaching an expected, collective phenotype. The absence of detailed information preceding development distinguishes this hypothesis from the common alternatives of a program or blueprint. Collective specification would have important implications for developmental plasticity and evolution.

Biological Evolution↗