PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ANESTHESIA, SPINAL”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Increase in skin temperature after spinal anesthesia in infants.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The relatively stable hemodynamics during spinal anesthesia in infants have been attributed to a less active sympathetic nervous system in comparison with adults. Thus, the authors evaluated sympathetic block primarily by measurement of skin temperature and secondarily by determination of noninvasive blood pressure as an indirect sign of sympatholysis. METHODS: In 15 infants (postconceptual age: 45.0 +/- 4.8 weeks; weight: 4.0 +/- 1.2 kg) scheduled for repair of inguinal hernia under spinal anesthesia, skin temperature at the T4 level and at the plantar foot was measured before and after spinal anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia was induced at the L4/L5 interspace with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 1 mg/kg with 10 microg/kg adrenaline added. RESULTS: Temperature at the plantar foot after spinal anesthesia rose significantly from 33.0 degrees C +/- 1.3 degrees C to 34.7 degrees C +/- 1.4 degrees C within 10 minutes and to 35.6 degrees C +/- 0.9 degrees C after 20 minutes (P < .0001), whereas the temperature at the thorax remained constant at 35 degrees C to 36 degrees C. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased by 15.9 +/- 11.4 mm Hg and 9.0 +/- 9.2 mm Hg, respectively (P < .01), but remained within normal range in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found a significant increase in skin temperature of the feet within 10 minutes as a sign of sympatholysis, whereas trunk temperature remained constant. Blood pressure decreased but remained within the normal range, despite the observed sympatholysis.

Anesthesia, Spinal↗
PubMed1995

[Spinal anesthesia for patients with progressive muscular dystrophy].

Spinal anesthesia was applied on 8 occasions to 7 patients with progressive muscular dystrophy (PMD) undergoing orthopedic lower limb surgery. No postoperative complication occurred in all patients. During the operations, however, two patients were subjected to high spinal anesthesia, which caused ventilatory suppression in one patient and bronchial asthma attack in another. Both respiratory complications were easily managed by ventilatory assistance with endotracheal intubation or by administration of bronchodilator, respectively. High spinal anesthesia should be avoided in applying spinal anesthesia to patients with PMD.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

General versus spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy: results of a prospective, randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of general anesthesia (GA) versus spinal anesthesia (SpA) on intraoperative and postoperative outcome in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were randomized into group 1 (GA: 34 patients) or group 2 (L2-L3 or L3-L4 SpA: 38 patients) and underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy. The intraoperative and postoperative anesthetic and surgical variables were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean +/- SEM operative time was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.43). The overall blood loss was less in group 2 (P = 0.04). The mean +/- SEM postoperative time in the postoperative holding area was significantly shorter after SpA than after GA (P <0.0001). The perioperative pain outcome in the postoperative holding area was significantly better for group 2 than for group 1 (P = 0.0017), but postoperative pain on day 1 was not significantly different between the two groups. The postoperative sedation score was significantly less in group 2 than in group 1 (P <0.0001). On day 1, first flatus passed in a significantly larger number of patients in group 2 (P <0.0001), and the overall gait was greater for group 2 patients (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that SpA allows good muscle relaxation and a successful surgical outcome in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Moreover, SpA results in less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative pain, and a faster postoperative recovery than GA.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1997

The direction of the Whitacre needle aperture affects the extent and duration of isobaric spinal anesthesia.

The use of Whitacre spinal needles results in directional flow out of the needle aperture, diverting local anesthetic from the longitudinal axis of the needle. Thus, a change in orientation of the needle aperture would be expected to result in a different local anesthetic distribution in the subarachnoid space. We studied 40 outpatients undergoing elective knee arthroscopy under spinal anesthesia with 60 mg plain lidocaine 2% in a prospective, double-blinded manner. Patients were randomly assigned to either Group I (needle aperture oriented in a cephalad direction throughout intrathecal injection) or Group II (aperture directed caudally). Onset and offset of sensory and motor block were analyzed at frequent intervals. Times to completion of ambulatory milestones, including discharge, were recorded. Group I was characterized by a higher sensory level (T 3.4 +/- 1.3 vs T 6.6 +/- 2.8, P < 0.001). Group I had significantly shorter duration of lumbar sensory anesthesia (149.2 +/- 30.6 min vs 177.8 +/- 23.5 min, P < 0.01) and motor blockade (117.6 +/- 26.1 min vs 150.0 +/- 22.8 min, P < 0.001). Mean time to outpatient discharge was approximately 32 min shorter in Group I. The orientation of the Whitacre needle aperture exerts a major influence on sensory level, as well as the duration of isobaric lidocaine spinal anesthesia.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Hearing loss does not occur in young patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although uncommon, hearing loss after spinal anesthesia has been described. Vestibulocochlear dysfunction after spinal anesthesia in which 22-gauge and 25-gauge Quincke needles were used was investigated to determine if needle size affected hearing. METHODS: Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, aged 20 to 40 years, who were undergoing lower extremity surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomized into 2 groups. After intravenous hydration, 3 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine was administered for spinal anesthesia, which was performed with a 22-gauge Quincke needle in group I (n=30) patients and a 25-gauge Quincke needle in group II (n=30) patients. Before surgery and 2 days after surgery, pure-tone audiometry and tympanometry were performed. Preoperative and postoperative hearing data were obtained in the right and left ears for every frequency. Headache, nausea, and vomiting and cranial nerve III, IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII function were assessed on postoperative day 2. RESULTS: Demographic data were not different between the groups. No hypoacousis was noted at any frequency during the entire testing period in either group. Two patients from group I experienced postdural puncture headache on postoperative day 3, and neither had hearing loss. No patient had cranial nerve dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to induce hearing loss in young patients undergoing spinal anesthesia by injecting the anesthetic with a 22-gauge or a 25-gauge Quincke needle.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗
PubMed2001

Evaluation of orthostatic blood pressure testing as a discharge criterion from PACU after spinal anesthesia.

Discharge readiness from a Phase I PACU after spinal anesthesia is frequently determined by recovery of sensory/motor function. However, no data exist indicating that recovery of sensory/motor function adequately predicts hemodynamic stability after spinal anesthesia. The conservative practice of waiting until the sensory/motor effects of spinal anesthesia have completely worn off often requires patients to remain in PACU for prolonged periods of time. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of using orthostatic blood pressure (BP) testing as a discharge criterion from PACU after spinal anesthesia. This study used a prospective, descriptive design to measure changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP) during orthostatic BP testing at 30-minute intervals after admission to the PACU following spinal anesthesia. A convenience sample of 121 patients admitted through the Same Day Surgery (SDS) unit was used. Results show that orthostatic BP criterion was safe and effective as an alternative to sensory/motor criteria in assessing hemodynamic stability and reducing the amount of time patients spend in the PACU after spinal anesthesia. This is a U.S. government work. There are no restrictions on its use.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

[A retrospective study in spinal anesthesia for sumo-wrestlers].

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia for the Sumo-wrestler is thought to be difficult because of following reasons. 1. Sumo-wrestlers are so fatty and weighty that piercing spinal needle into the subarachnoid space is technically difficult. 2. The relationship between volume of local anesthetics and attained spinal anesthesia level is difficult to detect. 3. Upper airway can be easily obstructed during sedation. METHODS: Retrospectively, we compared 30 Sumo-wrestler patients (group S) with normal body weight patients (group N) concerning 17 items. RESULTS: While all patients in group N were approached from L 3 and L 4 interspinal space using 25 gauge spinal needles, 13 patients in group S were approached from another interspinal space, for example L 2 and L 3 or L 4 and L 5 and 40% of patients in group S needed 23 gauge spinal needles. The time intervals from the entrance into the operating room till the end of intrathecal administration of local anesthetics in group S and group N were 34 and 24 minutes, respectively (P < 0.05). The distances from the surface of the skin to subarachnoid space in group S and group N were 80 mm and 49 mm, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that subarachnoid puncture in Sumo-wrestler patients is difficult and we should understand the specificities of spinal anesthesia for these patients.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Hemodynamic effects of continuous spinal anesthesia: a comparative study between low and high doses of bupivacaine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Arterial hypotension is a major side effect of spinal anesthesia. Continuous spinal anesthesia may allow titration of the amount of local anesthetic to obtain a level that is appropriate for the surgical procedure. METHODS: This study compared the hemodynamic effects and the quality of analgesia of spinal anesthesia performed with 3 ml of either 0.125% (n = 12) or 0.5% (n = 13) plain bupivacaine in 25 elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. RESULTS: The initial dose's duration of action (time elapsed between the end of injection and the first patient's complaint of pain during surgery) was shorter in the group receiving 3 ml of 0.125% plain bupivacaine than in the group receiving 0.5% plain bupivacaine: 80 +/- 31 minutes versus 114 +/- 37 minutes, respectively (mean +/- SD; p less than 0.05). In 6 (50%) of 12 patients of the 0.125% group and in 2 (15%) of 13 of the 0.5% group, analgesia became insufficient during the surgical procedure, necessitating injection of an additional 1 ml (top-up) of the previous solution. All subjects obtained good anesthesia for the entire procedure. The mean dose of bupivacaine necessary for the procedure was significantly lower in the 0.125% group (4.8 +/- 1.3 mg) compared with the 0.5% group (16.1 +/- 3 mg). For a similar maximal upper level of analgesia (T4-T12 in the 0.125% group versus T2-T10 in the 0.5% group), the decrease in systolic arterial pressure was more pronounced in the 0.5% group than in the 0.125% group during the period 15-40 minutes after induction of spinal anesthesia (p less than 0.05%). The mean dose of ephedrine was threefold larger in the 0.5% group than in the 0.125% group. CONCLUSION: Continuous spinal anesthesia with small amounts of 0.125% plain bupivacaine produces effective anesthesia for orthopedic procedures in elderly patients with minimal hemodynamic changes.

Aged↗
PubMed1989

Effect of injection rate on level and duration of hypobaric spinal anesthesia.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether injection rate affects the spread of hypobaric spinal anesthesia. Hypobaric spinal anesthesia was performed on 20 patients for total hip arthroplasty. Dural puncture was performed with a 22-gauge Whitacre needle. All patients received 10 mg of hypobaric tetracaine with epinephrine. An electrically driven syringe pump was used to inject the anesthetic solution at either slow (250 sec) or fast (10 sec) rates. Ten patients received slow injections, and 10 received fast injections. Anesthetic levels, duration of anesthesia, and specific gravities of injectate and CSF were measured. Slow injection resulted in less spread of spinal anesthesia. Four-segment regression of anesthetic levels took significantly longer in the slow injection group. Local anesthetic mixtures used were consistently hypobaric compared to patient CSF. We conclude that slow injection of hypobaric tetracaine through a 22-gauge Whitacre needle produces lower levels of spinal anesthesia that tend to be of longer duration than levels resulting from fast injection.

Anesthesia, Spinal↗
PubMed2003

The effect of right versus left lateral decubitus positions on induction of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

UNLABELLED: Induction of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in the left lateral (LL) decubitus position combined with intraoperative left uterine displacement may result in pooling of local anesthetic onto one side of the body. We studied the effect of the right lateral (RL) and LL decubitus positions during placement of spinal anesthesia on the intrathecal spread of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus fentanyl in 60 term parturients. Though all parturients acquired a loss of cold sensation at T4 15 min after intrathecal injection, more parturients in the LL group than in the RL group did so at 5 min (P < 0.05). The maximum levels of sensory blockades, amounts of fluid, vasopressor, and supplementary analgesia used, and the incidence of postoperative complications were similar. We conclude that the two positions can be used equally well when hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl are used in cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. IMPLICATIONS: We conducted a double-blinded randomized trial comparing the spread of spinal anesthesia placed with a parturient in either the right or left lateral position. There was a faster onset in the left lateral group; however, the maximum block heights and the time taken to achieve them were similar in both groups.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗
PubMed1998

Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia with mepivacaine and lidocaine.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia with lidocaine is ideal for ambulatory surgery because of its short duration of action. However, transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) occur in 0-40% of patients. The incidence of TNS with mepivacaine, which has a similar duration of action, is unknown. METHODS: Sixty ambulatory patients undergoing knee arthroscopy received spinal anesthesia in a randomized, double-blinded manner, with either 45 mg 1.5% mepivacaine or 60 mg 2% lidocaine. An L3-L4 midline approach was used with a 27-gauge Whitacre needle and a 20-gauge introducer. The local anesthetic was injected over approximately 30 s with the aperture of the Whitacre needle in a cephalad direction. Two to 4 days after operation, each patient was questioned about the development of TNS. In addition, the two groups were compared for time to regression of sensory and motor blockade and time to discharge milestones. RESULTS: Three patients receiving lidocaine were lost to follow-up. None of the 30 patients in the mepivacaine group developed TNS, whereas 6 of 27 (22%) in the lidocaine group did (P = 0.008). Time to regression to the L5 sensory level and to complete resolution of motor block were similar in both groups. The times to discharge milestones were also comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of TNS is greater with 2% lidocaine than with 1.5% mepivacaine for patients having unilateral knee arthroscopy under spinal anesthesia. Mepivacaine seems to be a promising alternative to lidocaine for outpatient surgical procedures because of its similar duration of action. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal dose of intrathecal mepivacaine for ambulatory surgery and the incidence of TNS with other doses and concentrations of intrathecal mepivacaine.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Prevention of hypotension by a single 5-mg dose of ephedrine during small-dose spinal anesthesia in prehydrated cesarean delivery patients.

UNLABELLED: To evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic ephedrine for the prevention of hypotension associated with spinal anesthesia, 50 parturients undergoing cesarean delivery received either ephedrine 5 mg or saline IV in a double-blinded fashion immediately after the induction of spinal anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia was performed with hyperbaric bupivacaine 6.6 mg combined with sufentanil 3.3 microg as part of a combined spinal-epidural technique. All patients received 1000 mL of lactated Ringer's solution and 500 mL of hydroxyethylstarch 6% before the spinal injection. Additional ephedrine boluses (5 mg) were administered IV when the systolic blood pressure or heart rate decreased by more than 30% from baseline values, when systolic blood pressure became <100 mm Hg, or when patients complained of nausea or feeling faint. The height of the block was equal in the groups; however, more patients in the placebo group were found to develop hypotension (58% vs 25%, P < 0. 05). Only 2 (8%) patients in the ephedrine group developed hypotension with systolic blood pressure values <90 mm Hg, whereas 10 patients (42%) in the saline group experienced hypotension of this severity (P < 0.05). In addition, there was a higher incidence of nausea in the placebo-treated patients. The total amount of ephedrine administered did not differ between groups. These findings suggest that the incidence and severity of hypotension are significantly reduced by the IV administration of a prophylactic dose of 5 mg ephedrine in patients receiving small-dose spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. IMPLICATIONS: Ephedrine is the drug most often used to correct hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in healthy patients. A single IV dose of 5 mg decreases the occurrence and limits the severity of hypotension in prehydrated subjects receiving a small-dose spinal local anesthetic-opioid combination.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of 25 and 27 gauge needle in spinal anesthesia learning curve for anesthesia residency training.

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE: Size of spinal needle may be a factor which influences the success rate of spinal anesthesia. OBJECTIVES: To compare learning curves of using 25G and 27G quincke spinal needle for spinal anesthesia. SETTING: Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. DESIGN: Prospective randomized control trial. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Ten new first year anesthesia residents were randomized to 2 groups: Group I (n = 5) used 25G Quincke spinal needle, Group II (n = 5) used 27G Quincke spinal needle to perform 200 consecutive cases of spinal anesthesia. Number of success and failure was recorded by each individual resident anonymously. The learning curves of plotted by cumulative sum of success rate revealed an initial rapid improvement of success during the first 20 cases in both groups. The overall success rate of group I was 84% (95CI, 66.5-100) and group II was 87% (95%CI, 61.5-100); p = 0.89. The widest difference between the 2 learning curves at 20 attempts intervals was at the twentieth attempts with a success rate of 76.0% VS 65.0% in group I and group II respectively; p = 0.54. CONCLUSION: The learning curves of spinal anesthesia using 25G and 27G Quincke spinal needle showed rapid improvement of success rate at the first 20 spinal block and high overall success rate with no significant difference between the groups.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The effects of lactated Ringer's solution infusion on cardiac output changes after spinal anesthesia.

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the effects of an infusion of lactated Ringer's (LR) solution on changes in cardiac output (CO) after spinal anesthesia. Seventy-five patients scheduled for lower extremity surgery under spinal anesthesia were studied. We measured CO (impedance cardiography method) and blood pressure for 25 min before and 30 min after spinal anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to three groups. In the No Infusion group, no LR solution was given during the period of measurements. The LR Before group received 12 mL/kg of LR solution within 20 min before spinal anesthesia. The LR After group received 12 mL/kg of LR solution within 20 min starting immediately after spinal anesthesia. After spinal anesthesia, CO decreased by 13.9% in the No Infusion group. In the LR Before group, CO increased after the infusion by 20% and returned to baseline value 30 min after spinal anesthesia. In the LR After group, CO increased after spinal anesthesia, and 30 min after spinal anesthesia, CO was 11.3% above baseline. We conclude that the decrease in CO after spinal anesthesia can be prevented by the infusion of an LR solution, with CO reaching the highest value while the infusion is running. IMPLICATIONS: We studied the effects of lactated Ringer's solution infusion on cardiac output changes after spinal anesthesia. If the patients received no infusion, cardiac output decreased after spinal anesthesia. However, if the patients received lactated Ringer's solution infusion, cardiac output was maintained.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

[Spinal anesthesia].

The article deals with some aspects of spinal anesthesia. It analyses in the light of possible complications the results of spinal anesthesia conducted in 4,186 cases with 1% sovcaine (cinchocaine hydrochloride) solution and 5% novocaine (procaine hydrochloride) solution by 60 surgeons. Spinal anesthesia was applied in patients, whose ages ranged from 11 to 96 years, in various operations. Contraindications for the method were determined. The author appraises comparatively spinal anesthesia with the related peridural anesthesia and discusses the prospects of the development of the method with the existence of new anesthetics and very thin needles for puncture of the subarachnoid space, which leads to the minimum number of possible complications.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

[Cause of hypotension during spinal anesthesia--the relation between the level of anesthesia and the hypotension].

A retrospective study was conducted on the cause of hypotension during spinal anesthesia and also on the relation between the level of anesthesia and the hypotension. Two hundred twenty three patients who had received spinal anesthesia for gynecological surgery were divided into two groups. Group I consisted of 87 patients with a significant decrease in blood pressure, while group II consisted of 136 patients with no significant decrease in blood pressure. First, the age, dosage of spinal anesthesia, amount of preoperative transfusion, and level of spinal anesthesia were reviewed and compared between the group I and II. Next, all the patients were classified by the level of spinal anesthesia, and the degree of decrease in blood pressure and the frequency of a significant decrease in blood pressure were examined by each level of spinal anesthesia. Only the level of spinal anesthesia was found to differ significantly between the group I and II. The degree of hypotension was greater at higher levels of spinal anesthesia. More than 50% of the patients with T5 or higher levels of anesthesia had a significant decrease in blood pressure. We conclude that the cause of the significant decrease in blood pressure during high spinal anesthesia is in most part due to the blockade of the cardiac sympathetic nerve.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Spinal anesthesia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this article is to review current practice of spinal anesthesia regarding technique and medication use; review recent applications of spinal anesthesia to subspecialty care in outpatient, cardiac, and obstetrical anesthesia; and update risk assessment associated with spinal anesthesia. RECENT FINDINGS: Epidural volume extension enhances the spread of local anesthetics using a combined spinal-epidural technique. Chloroprocaine has become the agent of choice at some institutions. The growth in both the number and complexity of ambulatory surgery procedures has redefined the role of spinal anesthesia for outpatients. The 27-gauge Whitacre spinal needle is associated with a lower incidence of post-dural puncture headaches. Retrospective reviews can predict the incidence of rare complications such as neurologic injury and cardiac arrest. SUMMARY: Innovations in technology, equipment, and needle design improved safety and decreased complication rates from spinal anesthesia. The increased popularity of ambulatory surgical procedures has resulted in more frequent use of spinal anesthesia. Intrathecal narcotic analgesia is used increasingly in fast-tracking cardiac surgical protocols. Modern anesthetic and analgesic techniques include resurgence of older agents (2-chloroprocaine) as well as new agents (levobupivacaine and ropivacaine) that are used in conjunction with adjuvant intrathecal medications (opioids, vasopressors, and alpha-2 adrenergic agonists). Surgical thromboprophylaxis and the increased use of anticoagulants in patients with cardiovascular disease have challenged anesthesiologists to update clinical guidelines to minimize the risk of hemorrhagic complications such as epidural hematoma. The risk/benefit ratio of spinal anesthesia should be individualized. The continued popularity of spinal anesthesia is due to the safety, effectiveness and efficiency of this technique.

Journal Article↗