Molecular determinants of cannabinoid activity: toward the design of cannabinoid analgesics with reduced psychoactive liability.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Analgesics↗
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Results for “Cannabinoids”
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Mississippi-grown Cannabis sativa L. 3. Cannabinoid and cannabinoid acid content.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Cannabis↗
Effect of cannabinoids on the abdominal constriction response in mice: within cannabinoid interactions.
After oral administration to mice, delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabinol (CBN) caused a dose-dependent suppression of the abdominal constriction response to formic acid. Cannabinol was 50 times less active than THC and cannabidiol (CBD) was without effect. The effects of THC and CBN were additive. CBD antagonised the antinociceptive effects of both THC and CBN in a dose-dependent manner.
Abdomen↗
delta7-Tetrahydrocannabinol, a non-psychotropic cannabinoid: structure-activity considerations in the cannabinoid series.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Animals↗
Review: cannabinoids and codeine have similar effects on pain relief, but cannabinoids commonly cause adverse psychotropic effects.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Comment↗
Interactions of cannabinoids with membranes. The role of cannabinoid stereochemistry and absolute configuration and the orientation of delta-9-THC in the membrane bilayer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Dronabinol↗
Therapeutic potential of cannabinoids in CNS disease.
The major psychoactive constituent of Cannabis sativa, delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta(9)-THC), and endogenous cannabinoid ligands, such as anandamide, signal through G-protein-coupled cannabinoid receptors localised to regions of the brain associated with important neurological processes. Signalling is mostly inhibitory and suggests a role for cannabinoids as therapeutic agents in CNS disease where inhibition of neurotransmitter release would be beneficial. Anecdotal evidence suggests that patients with disorders such as multiple sclerosis smoke cannabis to relieve disease-related symptoms. Cannabinoids can alleviate tremor and spasticity in animal models of multiple sclerosis, and clinical trials of the use of these compounds for these symptoms are in progress. The cannabinoid nabilone is currently licensed for use as an antiemetic agent in chemotherapy-induced emesis. Evidence suggests that cannabinoids may prove useful in Parkinson's disease by inhibiting the excitotoxic neurotransmitter glutamate and counteracting oxidative damage to dopaminergic neurons. The inhibitory effect of cannabinoids on reactive oxygen species, glutamate and tumour necrosis factor suggests that they may be potent neuroprotective agents. Dexanabinol (HU-211), a synthetic cannabinoid, is currently being assessed in clinical trials for traumatic brain injury and stroke. Animal models of mechanical, thermal and noxious pain suggest that cannabinoids may be effective analgesics. Indeed, in clinical trials of postoperative and cancer pain and pain associated with spinal cord injury, cannabinoids have proven more effective than placebo but may be less effective than existing therapies. Dronabinol, a commercially available form of delta(9)-THC, has been used successfully for increasing appetite in patients with HIV wasting disease, and cannabinoid receptor antagonists may reduce obesity. Acute adverse effects following cannabis usage include sedation and anxiety. These effects are usually transient and may be less severe than those that occur with existing therapeutic agents. The use of nonpsychoactive cannabinoids such as cannabidiol and dexanabinol may allow the dissociation of unwanted psychoactive effects from potential therapeutic benefits. The existence of other cannabinoid receptors may provide novel therapeutic targets that are independent of CB(1) receptors (at which most currently available cannabinoids act) and the development of compounds that are not associated with CB(1) receptor-mediated adverse effects. Further understanding of the most appropriate route of delivery and the pharmacokinetics of agents that act via the endocannabinoid system may also reduce adverse effects and increase the efficacy of cannabinoid treatment. This review highlights recent advances in understanding of the endocannabinoid system and indicates CNS disorders that may benefit from the therapeutic effects of cannabinoid treatment. Where applicable, reference is made to ongoing clinical trials of cannabinoids to alleviate symptoms of these disorders.
Analgesia↗
Regulation of the cAMP cascade, gene expression and immune function by cannabinoid receptors.
The objective of this article is to discuss the putative role of cannabinoid receptors in immune modulation by cannabinoid compounds. The primary focus is on the signal transduction events that are initiated following ligand binding to cannabinoid receptors and how these events lead to detrimental effects on the normal responsiveness of immunocompetent cells. Toward this end, signalling events are traced from the cannabinoid receptor to the transcription factors which are adversely regulated in the presence of cannabinoid compounds during leukocyte activation. Moreover, this aberrant regulation of transcription factors is discussed in the context of altered gene expression and the impact this has on leukocyte function. Lastly, an important goal of this article is to dispel a long standing myth that the cyclic adenosine 3':5'-monophosphate (cAMP) cascade is a negative regulatory pathway for immunocompetent cells. This chapter examines two major immunologic cell-types which are well established as exhibiting altered function following cannabinoid treatment, helper T-cells and the macrophage. Not discussed are the effects of cannabinoids on B-cell function. This is primarily due to the rather refractory nature of B-cells to inhibition by cannabinoids in spite of the fact that this cell-type expresses functional cannabinoid receptors [Schatz, A.R., Koh, W.S., Kaminski, N.E., 1993. Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol selectively inhibits T-cell dependent humoral immune responses through direct inhibition of accessory T-cell function. Immunopharmacol., 26, pp. 129-137.]. One cautionary note, although the focus of this article is on cannabinoid receptor mediated signalling events, immune modulation by cannabinoid compounds is likely multi-factorial presumably involving receptor as well as receptor-nonrelated events. Effects on leukocytes by cannabinoids which are believed to be mediated by receptor-nonrelated events are outside the scope of this paper and will not be discussed. One last introductory point is that even though their is presumably little overlap in the genes which are regulated by cannabinoids in leukocytes as compared to other cell-types (e.g., neural cells), the major signalling pathways involved in cellular regulation are ubiquitous. With that in mind, it is likely that their is a considerable amount of similarity in the signalling pathways regulated by cannabinoids in cell-types of different lineage, given that they express cannabinoid receptors. In this context, signalling events observed in leukocytes can provide important insight into which genes may be modulated by cannabinoid in other cell types.
Animals↗
Cannabinoid modulation of peripheral autonomic and sensory neurotransmission.
Cannabinoids are cell membrane-derived signalling molecules that are released from nerves, blood cells and endothelial cells, and have diverse biological effects. They act at two distinct types of G-protein-coupled receptors, cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptors. Cannabinoid CB(1) receptors are highly localised in the central nervous system and are also found in some peripheral tissues, and cannabinoid CB(2) receptors are found outside the central nervous system, in particular in association with immune tissues. Novel actions of cannabinoids at non-CB(1) non-CB(2) cannabinoid-like receptors and vanilloid VR1 receptors have also recently been described. There is growing evidence that, among other roles, cannabinoids can act at prejunctional sites to modulate peripheral autonomic and sensory neurotransmission, and the present article is aimed at providing an overview of this. Inhibitory cannabinoid CB(1) receptors are expressed on the peripheral terminals of autonomic and sensory nerves. The role of cannabinoid receptor ligands in modulation of sensory neurotransmission is complex, as certain of these (anandamide, an "endocannabinoid", and N-arachidonoyl-dopamine, an "endovanilloid") also activate vanilloid VR1 receptors (coexpressed with cannabinoid CB(1) receptors), which excites sensory nerves and causes a release of sensory neurotransmitter. The fact that the activities of anandamide and N-arachidonoyl-dopamine span two distinct receptor families raises important questions about cannabinoid/vanilloid nomenclature, and as both compounds are structurally related to the archetypal vanilloid capsaicin, all three are arguably members of the same family of signalling molecules. Anandamide is released from nerves, but unlike classical neurotransmitters, it is not stored in and released from nerve vesicles, but is released on demand from the nerve cell membrane. In the central nervous system, cannabinoids function as retrograde signalling molecules, inhibiting via presynaptic cannabinoid CB(1) receptors the release of classical transmitter following release from the postsynaptic cell. At the neuroeffector junction, it is more likely that cannabinoids are released from prejunctional sites, as the neuroeffector junction is wide in some peripheral tissues and cannabinoids are rapidly taken up and inactivated. Understanding the actions of cannabinoids as modulators of peripheral neurotransmission is relevant to a variety of biological systems and possibly their disorders.
Animals↗
Redistribution of CB1 cannabinoid receptors during evolution of cholinergic basal forebrain territories and their cortical projection areas: a comparison between the gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus, primates) and rat.
Endocannabinoid signaling, mediated by presynaptic CB1 cannabinoid receptors on neurons, is fundamental for the maintenance of synaptic plasticity by modulating neurotransmitter release from axon terminals. In the rodent basal forebrain, CB1 cannabinoid receptor-like immunoreactivity is only harbored by a subpopulation of cholinergic projection neurons. However, endocannabinoid control of cholinergic output from the substantia innominata, coincident target innervation of cholinergic and CB1 cannabinoid receptor-containing afferents, and cholinergic regulation of endocannabinoid synthesis in the hippocampus suggest a significant cholinergic-endocannabinergic interplay. Given the functional importance of the cholinergic modulation of endocannabinoid signaling, here we studied CB1 cannabinoid receptor distribution in cholinergic basal forebrain territories and their cortical projection areas in a prosimian primate, the gray mouse lemur. Perisomatic CB1 cannabinoid receptor immunoreactivity was unequivocally present in non-cholinergic neurons of the olfactory tubercule, and in cholecystokinin-containing interneurons in layers 2/3 of the neocortex. Significantly, CB1 cannabinoid receptor-like immunoreactivity was localized to cholinergic perikarya in the magnocellular basal nucleus. However, cortical cholinergic terminals lacked detectable CB1 cannabinoid receptor levels. A dichotomy of CB1 cannabinoid receptor distribution in frontal (suprasylvian) and parietotemporal (subsylvian) cortices was apparent. In the frontal cortex, CB1 cannabinoid receptor-containing axons concentrated in layers 2/3 and layer 6, while layer 4 and layer 5 were essentially devoid of CB1 cannabinoid receptor immunoreactivity. In contrast, CB1 cannabinoid receptors decorated axons in all layers of the parietotemporal cortex with peak densities in layer 2 and layer 4. In the hippocampus, CB1 cannabinoid receptor-containing terminals concentrated around pyramidal cell somata and proximal dendrites in the CA1-CA3 areas, and granule cell dendrites in the molecular layer of the dentate gyrus. CB1 cannabinoid receptors frequently localized to inhibitory GABAergic terminals while leaving glutamatergic boutons unlabeled. Aging did not affect either the density or layer-specific distribution of CB1 cannabinoid receptor-immunoreactive processes. We concluded that organizing principles of CB1 cannabinoid receptor-containing neurons and their terminal fields within the basal forebrain are evolutionarily conserved between rodents and prosimian primates. In contrast, the areal expansion and cytoarchitectonic differentiation of neocortical subfields in primates is associated with differential cortical patterning of CB1 cannabinoid receptor-containing subcortical and intracortical afferents.
Acetylcholine↗
The CB1 cannabinoid receptor mediates glutamatergic synaptic suppression in the hippocampus.
Cannabinoids have profound effects on synaptic function and behavior. Of the two cloned cannabinoid receptors, cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) is widely distributed in the CNS and accounts for most of the neurological effects of cannabinoids, while cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2) expression in the CNS is very limited. The presence of additional receptors [i.e. cannabinoid receptor 3 (CB3)] is suggested by growing evidence of cannabinoid effects that are not mediated by CB1 or CB2. The most direct functional evidence for a CB3 comes from a study in hippocampus where deletion of CB1 was shown to have no effect on cannabinoid-mediated suppression of the excitatory synapse between Schaffer collateral/commissural fibers and CA1 pyramidal cells [Novel cannabinoid-sensitive receptor mediates inhibition of glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the hippocampus. Neuroscience 106:1-4]. In contrast, we report here that in extracellular field recordings, the cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212-2 (5 microM) had no effect on Schaffer collateral/commissural fiber-CA1 pyramidal cell (Sch-CA1) synaptic transmission in slices from two independently made cannabinoid receptor 1-/- lines [Zimmer et al 1999 and Ledent et al 1999] while strongly suppressing Sch-CA1 synaptic transmission in CB1+/+ mice of the background strains. Also, we observed robust cannabinoid-mediated suppression of the Sch-CA1 synapse in pure C57BL/6 mice, contradicting a recent report that cannabinoid suppression of this synapse is absent in this strain [Hoffman AF, Macgill AM, Smith D, Oz M, Lupica CR (2005) Species and strain differences in the expression of a novel glutamate-modulating cannabinoid receptor in the rodent hippocampus. Eur J Neurosci 22:2387-2391]. Our results strongly suggest that cannabinoid-induced suppression of the Sch-CA1 synapse is mediated by CB1. Non-canonical cannabinoid receptors do not seem to play a major role in inhibiting transmitter release at this synapse.
Animals↗
Cannabinoids enhance NMDA-elicited Ca2+ signals in cerebellar granule neurons in culture.
A physiological role for cannabinoids in the CNS is indicated by the presence of endogenous cannabinoids and cannabinoid receptors. However, the cellular mechanisms of cannabinoid actions in the CNS have yet to be fully defined. In the current study, we identified a novel action of cannabinoids to enhance intracellular Ca2+ responses in CNS neurons. Acute application of the cannabinoid receptor agonists R(+)-methanandamide, R(+)-WIN, and HU-210 (1-50 nM) dose-dependently enhanced the peak amplitude of the Ca2+ response elicited by stimulation of the NMDA subtype of glutamate receptors (NMDARs) in cerebellar granule neurons. The cannabinoid effect was blocked by the cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A and the Gi/Go protein inhibitor pertussis toxin but was not mimicked by the inactive cannabinoid analog S(-)-WIN, indicating the involvement of cannabinoid receptors. In current-clamp studies neither R(+)-WIN nor R(+)-methanandamide altered the membrane response to NMDA or passive membrane properties of granule neurons, suggesting that NMDARs are not the primary sites of cannabinoid action. Additional Ca2+ imaging studies showed that cannabinoid enhancement of the Ca2+ signal to NMDA did not involve N-, P-, or L-type Ca2+ channels but was dependent on Ca2+ release from intracellular stores. Moreover, the phospholipase C inhibitor U-73122 and the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) receptor antagonist xestospongin C blocked the cannabinoid effect, suggesting that the cannabinoid enhancement of NMDA-evoked Ca2+ signals results from enhanced release from IP3-sensitive Ca2+ stores. These data suggest that the CNS cannabinoid system could serve a critical modulatory role in CNS neurons through the regulation of intracellular Ca2+ signaling.
Animals↗
Reversal of SR 141716A-induced head-twitch and ear-scratch responses in mice by delta 9-THC and other cannabinoids.
Recently, we have shown that cannabinoids of diverse structure block the ability of the selective 5-HT(2A/C) agonist DOI to produce the head-twitch response (HTR) and the ear-scratch response (ESR) in mice. The cannabinoid CB(1) antagonist/inverse agonist SR 141716A also induces these behaviors in mice. The purposes of the present study were: (1) to investigate whether Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) and other cannabinoids HU-210 and WIN 55, 212-2 can prevent SR 141716A-induced HTR and ESR and (2) to evaluate any correlation between the ID(50) potency order of the cited cannabinoids in blocking SR 141716A-induced HTR and ESR and their ED(50) order of potency in reducing spontaneous locomotor activity and rearing behavior. For the SR 141716A reversal study, different groups of mice were injected intraperitoneally with either vehicle or varying doses of the following cannabinoids: Delta(9)-THC (2.5-20 mg/kg), Delta(8)-THC (5-20 mg/kg), HU-210 (0.05-0.5 mg/kg), CP 55, 940 (0.5-2.5 mg/kg) and WIN 55, 212-2 (2.5-10 mg/kg). Thirty minutes later, each mouse received SR 141716A (2.5 mg/kg ip) and the frequencies of the induced behaviors (mean +/- S.E.M.) were recorded for the next 30 min. The effects of the cited doses of cannabinoids were also examined on spontaneous locomotor activity and rearing frequency for a 20-min duration 10 min after cannabinoid injection. The tested cannabinoids reduced the frequencies of HTR and ESR in SR 141716A-injected mice. These agents also attenuated the cited naturally occurring repertoire of motor parameters in mice. Although large potency differences were observed among the cited cannabinoids, each tested cannabinoid was relatively equipotent in preventing locomotor parameters and SR 141716A-induced behaviors. The ID(50) potency order of cannabinoids in blocking SR 141716A-induced HTR and ESR were similar (HU-210>CP 55, 940>WIN 55, 212-2 > or = Delta 9)-THC=Delta(8)-THC), and are comparable with: (1) their ED(50) potency order in attenuating both spontaneous locomotor activity and rearing behavior (HU-210>CP 55, 940>WIN 55, 212-2>Delta(9)-THC=Delta(8)-THC) and (2) their published ED(50) potency order for producing the tetrad of behaviors in mice as well as their rank order of binding affinities for cannabinoid CB(1) receptors. The present data show that cannabinoids of diverse structure prevent SR 141716A-induced HTR and ESR, and inhibition of these behaviors by cannabinoids could be used as a new index of cannabimimetic activity.
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic↗
Activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase/PKB pathway by CB(1) and CB(2) cannabinoid receptors expressed in prostate PC-3 cells. Involvement in Raf-1 stimulation and NGF induction.
Cannabinoids exert a variety of physiological and pharmacological responses in humans through interaction with specific cannabinoid receptors. Cannabinoid receptors described to date belong to the seven-transmembrane-domain receptor superfamily and are coupled through the inhibitory G(i) protein to adenylyl cyclase inhibition. However, downstream signal transduction mechanisms triggered by cannabinoids are poorly understood. We examined here the involvement of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/PKB pathway in the mechanism of action of cannabinoids in human prostate epithelial PC-3 cells. Cannabinoid receptors CB(1) and CB(2) are expressed in these cells, as shown by RT-PCR, Western blot and immunofluorescence techniques. Treatment of PC-3 cells with either Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the major psychoactive ingredient of marijuana, or R-(+)-methanandamide (MET), an analogue of the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide, increased phosphorylation of PKB in Thr308 and Ser473. The stimulation of PKB induced by cannabinoids was blocked by the two cannabinoid receptor antagonists, SR 141716 and SR 144528, and by the PI3K inhibitor LY 294002. These results indicate that activation of cannabinoid receptors in PC-3 cells stimulate the PI3K/PKB pathway. We further investigated the involvement of Raf-1/Erk activation in the mechanism of action of cannabinoid receptors. THC and MET induced translocation of Raf-1 to the membrane and phosphorylation of p44/42 Erk kinase, which was reversed by cannabinoid receptor antagonists and PI3K inhibitor. These results point to a sequential connection between cannabinoid receptors/PI3K/PKB pathway and Raf-1/Erk in prostate PC-3 cells. We also show that this pathway is involved in the mechanism of NGF induction exerted by cannabinoids in PC-3 cells.
3-Phosphoinositide-Dependent Protein Kinases↗
Cannabinoids modulate potassium current in cultured hippocampal neurons.
Characterization of the newly discovered G-protein-coupled cannabinoid receptor in brain requires determination of its functional significance. The effects are reported of several potent cannabinoid analogs (CP 55,244, CP 55,940, levonantradol and WIN 55,212-2) on cultured neurons from hippocampus, a brain region that exhibits high cannabinoid receptor density. The electrophysiological effects of cannabinoids were determined by whole-cell patch clamp recordings of voltage-dependent potassium currents. The voltage dependence of the rapidly inactivating potassium A current (IA), characteristic of hippocampal neurons, was significantly altered in a concentration-dependent manner by cannabinoid analogs. Decreased inactivation, which led to an increased activation of IA near resting levels in these cells, was observed after brief local extracellular applications of cannabinoids. These actions were blocked by pertussis toxin. Cellular dialysis of GTP-gamma-S mimicked the actions of cannabinoids on IA while blocking further effects due to added cannabinoids. The rank order of potency of the cannabinoid analogs was similar to that observed with respect to binding at cannabinoid receptors in brain membranes. The concentration-related effectiveness of cannabinoid analogs in modulating IA was similar to their potency in stimulating low Km GTPase in cell membranes isolated from the cannabinoid receptor-rich dentate gyrus. These data support the conclusion that cannabinoid effects on IA are mediated through G-protein-coupled receptors. This cannabinoid-induced shift in the voltage dependence of IA could serve to counteract fast, transient, depolarizing events such as action potentials and synaptic currents in hippocampal neurons.
Action Potentials↗
Mechanisms of cannabinoid-receptor-mediated inhibition of synaptic transmission in cultured hippocampal pyramidal neurons.
Cannabinoids, such as marijuana, are known to impair learning and memory perhaps through their actions in the hippocampus where cannabinoid receptors are expressed at high density. Although cannabinoid receptor activation decreases glutamatergic synaptic transmission in cultured hippocampal neurons, the mechanisms of this action are not known. Cannabinoid receptor activation also inhibits calcium channels that support neurotransmitter release in these cells, making modulation of these channels a candidate for cannabinoid-receptor-mediated effects on synaptic transmission. Whole cell patch-clamp recordings of glutamatergic neurons cultured from the CA1 and CA3 regions of the hippocampus were used to identify the mechanisms of the effects of cannabinoids on synaptic transmission. Cannabinoid receptor activation reduced excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) size by approximately 50% but had no effect on the amplitude of spontaneous miniature EPSCs (mEPSCs). This reduction in EPSC size was accompanied by an increase in paired-pulse facilitation measured in low (1 mM) extracellular calcium and by a decrease in paired-pulse depression measured in normal (2.5 mM) extracellular calcium. Together, these results strongly support the hypothesis that cannabinoid receptor activation decreases EPSC size by reducing release of neurotransmitter presynaptically while having no effect on postsynaptic sensitivity to glutamate. Further experiments were done to identify the molecular mechanisms underlying this cannabinoid-receptor-mediated decrease in neurotransmitter release. Cannabinoid receptor activation had no effect on the size of the presynaptic pool of readily releasable neurotransmitter-filled vesicles, eliminating reduction in pool size as a mechanism for cannabinoid-receptor-mediated effects. After blockade of Q- and N-type calcium channels with omega-agatoxin TK and omega-conotoxin GVIA; however, activation of cannabinoid receptors reduced EPSC size by only 14%. These results indicate that cannabinoid receptor activation reduces the probability that neurotransmitter will be released in response to an action potential via an inhibition of presynaptic Q- and N-type calcium channels. This molecular mechanism most likely contributes to the impairment of learning and memory produced by cannabinoids and may participate in the analgesic, antiemetic, and anticonvulsive effects of these drugs as well.
Animals↗
The neurobiology and evolution of cannabinoid signalling.
The plant Cannabis sativa has been used by humans for thousands of years because of its psychoactivity. The major psychoactive ingredient of cannabis is Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, which exerts effects in the brain by binding to a G-protein-coupled receptor known as the CB1 cannabinoid receptor. The discovery of this receptor indicated that endogenous cannabinoids may occur in the brain, which act as physiological ligands for CB1. Two putative endocannabinoid ligands, arachidonylethanolamide ('anandamide') and 2-arachidonylglycerol, have been identified, giving rise to the concept of a cannabinoid signalling system. Little is known about how or where these compounds are synthesized in the brain and how this relates to CB1 expression. However, detailed neuroanatomical and electrophysiological analysis of mammalian nervous systems has revealed that the CB1 receptor is targeted to the presynaptic terminals of neurons where it acts to inhibit release of 'classical' neurotransmitters. Moreover, an enzyme that inactivates endocannabinoids, fatty acid amide hydrolase, appears to be preferentially targeted to the somatodendritic compartment of neurons that are postsynaptic to CB1-expressing axon terminals. Based on these findings, we present here a model of cannabinoid signalling in which anandamide is synthesized by postsynaptic cells and acts as a retrograde messenger molecule to modulate neurotransmitter release from presynaptic terminals. Using this model as a framework, we discuss the role of cannabinoid signalling in different regions of the nervous system in relation to the characteristic physiological actions of cannabinoids in mammals, which include effects on movement, memory, pain and smooth muscle contractility. The discovery of the cannabinoid signalling system in mammals has prompted investigation of the occurrence of this pathway in non-mammalian animals. Here we review the evidence for the existence of cannabinoid receptors in non-mammalian vertebrates and invertebrates and discuss the evolution of the cannabinoid signalling system. Genes encoding orthologues of the mammalian CB1 receptor have been identified in a fish, an amphibian and a bird, indicating that CB1 receptors may occur throughout the vertebrates. Pharmacological actions of cannabinoids and specific binding sites for cannabinoids have been reported in several invertebrate species, but the molecular basis for these effects is not known. Importantly, however, the genomes of the protostomian invertebrates Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans do not contain CB1 orthologues, indicating that CB1-like cannabinoid receptors may have evolved after the divergence of deuterostomes (e.g. vertebrates and echinoderms) and protostomes. Phylogenetic analysis of the relationship of vertebrate CB1 receptors with other G-protein-coupled receptors reveals that the paralogues that appear to share the most recent common evolutionary origin with CB1 are lysophospholipid receptors, melanocortin receptors and adenosine receptors. Interestingly, as with CB1, each of these receptor types does not appear to have Drosophila orthologues, indicating that this group of receptors may not occur in protostomian invertebrates. We conclude that the cannabinoid signalling system may be quite restricted in its phylogenetic distribution, probably occurring only in the deuterostomian clade of the animal kingdom and possibly only in vertebrates.
Animals↗
Activation of brain-type cannabinoid receptors interferes with preimplantation mouse embryo development.
The recent identification and cloning of guanine nucleotide regulatory protein-coupled brain-type and spleen-type cannabinoid receptors (CB1-R and CB2-R, respectively) provide evidence that many of the effects of cannabinoids are mediated via these receptors. Our recent observation of expression of both CB1-R and CB2-R genes in the preimplantation mouse embryo suggests that it could also be a target for cannabinoids. Indeed, cannabinoid agonists interfered with preimplantation embryo development in vitro. To examine whether cannabinoid effects on preimplantation embryos are mediated via CB1-R, we developed rabbit antipeptide antibodies against the N-terminal region of CB1-R and examined the receptor protein in the blastocyst by Western blotting and its spatiotemporal distribution in preimplantation mouse embryos by immunohistochemistry. Cannabinoid binding sites in the blastocyst were examined by Scatchard analysis, while the reversibility of cannabinoid-induced embryonic arrest in vitro was monitored using a specific antagonist to CB1-R, SR141716A. Western blot analysis detected a major band of approximately 59 kDa and a minor band of approximately 54 kDa in the blastocyst. Immunocytochemistry detected this receptor protein from the 2-cell through the blastocyst stages. Scatchard analysis using 3H-anandamide (an endogenous ligand) showed a single class of binding sites in Day 4 blastocysts with an apparent Kd of 1.0 nM and Bmax of 0.09 fmol/blastocyst. Considering the total number of cells (approximately 50) and total protein content (approximately 20 ng) of a blastocyst, it is apparent that the mouse blastocyst has many more high-affinity receptors than those in the mouse brain (Kd: 1.8 nM and Bmax: 18.8 pmol/mg membrane protein). Cannabinoid agonists and the CB1-R antagonist SR141716A effectively competed for anandamide binding in the blastocyst. To determine whether cannabinoid inhibition of embryonic development could be reversed by SR141716A, 2-cell embryos were cultured in the presence of cannabinoid agonists with or without SR141716A for 72 h. Most of the 2-cell embryos cultured in the absence of the agonists developed into blastocysts (approximately 90%). In contrast, the addition of cannabinoid agonists anandamide, Win 55212-2, or CP 55,940 in the culture medium severely compromised embryonic development: more than 60% of the 2-cell embryos failed to develop to blastocysts. A reduction in trophectoderm cell numbers was noted in those blastocysts that escaped the developmental arrest in the presence of cannabinoid agonists. However, this reduction was corrected when embryos were cultured simultaneously with an agonist and SR141716A. Furthermore, embryonic arrest was reversed when embryos were cultured simultaneously in the presence of an agonist and SR141716A. The addition of SR141716A alone in the culture medium apparently had no effects on embryonic development: more than 90% of the embryos developed into blastocysts. The results suggest that the CB1 receptors in preimplantation mouse embryos are biologically active and cannabinoid effects on them are primarily mediated by these receptors.
Analgesics↗