PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Cervical Plexus Block”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Continuous brachial plexus block at the cervical level using a posterior approach in the management of neuropathic cancer pain.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neuropathic cancer pain due to tumor growth near the brachial plexus is often treated with a combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and oral or transdermal opioids. We propose placement of a catheter along the brachial plexus using a posterior approach for patients not responding to the above-mentioned treatment. CASE REPORT: We describe 2 patients with neuropathic cancer pain in the arm and shoulder despite treatment with dexamethasone, amitriptyline, gabapentin, opioids, and, in 1 patient, oral ketamine. An increase in daily opioid dosage did not relieve the pain but caused unacceptable side effects of nausea, vomiting, and sedation. Continuous administration of local anesthetics via a brachial plexus catheter inserted at the cervical level using a posterior approach resulted in a markedly improved analgesia and decreased opioid requirement. CONCLUSION: Continuous brachial plexus block should be considered in patients with severe neuropathic cancer pain in the arm and shoulder. To achieve sufficient pain relief for prolonged periods of time, a catheter was inserted to block the brachial plexus using a posterior approach. This technique may be a valuable alternative to the interscalene approach because of the improved fixation of the catheter in the muscle sheet of the trapezius, splenius cervicus, and levator scapulae muscles, and the decreased likelihood of catheter dislodgment during neck movements.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Block of the cervical plexus in surgery of the carotid artery. Our experience with 142 cases].

The main anesthesiological problem in TEAC operations is the possibility of evaluating the degree of tolerance after carotid artery clamping. When facing this situation, some anesthesiologists prefer to administer general anesthesia, others prefer loco-regional anesthesia. On the basis of their background and experience, the Authors, from 1.1.1987 to 12.31.1988, have performed 142 nerve blocks of the superficial and the cervical plexus. The proposed technique is simple. No side effects are observed. Moreover it is gratifying for the surgeon and safe from risks for patients. Loco-regional anesthesia permits a close neurologic monitoring that is easily understandable and inexpensive. When performing this kind of surgery, this technique seems to be valid and effective.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Carotid-surgery in ultrasound-guided anesthesia of the regio colli lateralis].

OBJECTIVE: Carotid endarterectomy significantly reduces the risk of stroke in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. An increasing number of interventions in carotid surgery are performed under regional anesthesia in conscious patients. Carotid endarterectomy in local anesthesia requires block of the cervical nerves C2-C4, which may be accomplished in different ways. The most frequent method of regional anesthesia in carotid surgery is a combined block of profunda and superficial cervical plexus (by using a nerve stimulator). Ultrasound is frequently used in anesthesia for venous access and peripheral nerve block. By ultrasound, it is possible to visualize puncture needle and spread of local anesthetics at the correct position for block of cervical plexus in carotid surgery. The aim of the case reports was to demonstrate the effectiveness of using ultrasound for regional anesthesia in carotid surgery. METHOD: At the level of carotid bifurcation, scalene muscles were visualized by ultrasound (10-MHz-transducer). At this position, a puncture needle was inserted in the beam of ultrasound. Between the anterior scalene and the sternocleidomastoid muscles the local anesthetics were injected (10 ml prilocaine 1 %, 20 ropivacaine 0.375 %). In addition, superficial cervical plexus was performed by subcutaneous injection (10 ml prilocaine 1 %, 40 ropivacaine 0.375 %). Sedation was performed by application of remifentanil (max. 0.02 microg/kg/min), as needed. RESULTS: Ultrasound guided cervical block was performed in 29 patients. In all cases cervical plexus block was complete. A conversion to general anesthesia during operation was not necessary in any case. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound presents an alternative to cervical block using nerve stimulation, especially in patients with anatomical abnormalities. The method proves to be effective and may improve the approach to profundeal cervical plexus.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

A comparison of two techniques for cervical plexus blockade: evaluation of efficacy and systemic toxicity.

UNLABELLED: We compared two techniques of cervical plexus blockade (CPB) for carotid endarterectomy. Cervical plexus nerve block was performed with a combination of bupivacaine and lidocaine, with injections at the C2-C3, C3-C4, and C4-C5 transverse processes in 11 patients (classical CPB) or with a single injection after localization of the cervical plexus with a nerve stimulator in 12 patients (interscalene CPB). Pain scores were obtained during block placement and at predetermined phases of the operation. Arterial blood was sampled before and 3, 5, 8, 10, 15, 25, 40, and 60 min after CPB for measurement of bupivacaine and lidocaine concentrations. Interscalene CPB was less painful than classical CPB. The techniques appeared equally effective. Patients in both groups required equivalent supplementation with IV fentanyl and additional local infiltration with lidocaine during the most painful stages of surgery. The maximal concentration of bupivacaine was lower in interscalene CPB compared with classical CPB (1.0 microg/mL versus 1.5 microg/mL, P < 0.01). The time required to reach the maximal concentration of bupivacaine was 15 (10-40) min in interscalene CPB and 10 (5-17) min in classical CPB (P < 0.05). Lidocaine maximal concentration was similar in both groups, however the time required to reach the maximal concentration was longer (P < 0.05) in interscalene CPB (15 [10-60] min) than in classical CPB (10 [8-20] min). We conclude that the interscalene CPB is as effective as the classical CPB as a regional technique for carotid endarterectomy and may be associated with a lower systemic absorption of bupivacaine. IMPLICATIONS: Cervical plexus blockade for carotid endarterectomy can be effectively performed with a single injection after localization of the cervical plexus with a nerve stimulator. This technique is simple and was associated with less systemic absorption of local anesthetic than the multiple-injection technique.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Applying cervical spine anatomy to interscalene brachial plexus blocks.

BACKGROUND: The interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) is a most reliable and commonly performed technique for regional anesthesia of the upper extremity. It has widespread clinical applicability, ranging from use for shoulder surgery as well as diagnostic and therapeutic uses in pain management. Traditional methods described for performing the ISBPB involve identifying surface anatomy landmarks. Unfortunately, in patients with less than ideal landmarks (those with short, thick necks and those lacking adequate muscle tone in the neck area) it becomes increasingly challenging to identify these landmarks. As a result there is greater uncertainty in accurately locating the brachial plexus, and consequently greater risk in performing the block. METHODS: A simple new approach to the interscalene brachial plexus block is described, utilizing the bony anatomy of the cervical spine as a landmark for directing the needle to the correct position, a nerve stimulator, and a confirmatory injection of a test dose of anesthetic solution to enhance accuracy. In addition, by correctly implementing this technique, the block may be performed by a sole operator. RESULTS: This simple approach has proven to be clinically effective in more than 2,000 blocks of the brachial plexus during the past 4 years. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that this technique represents a safe, reproducible, and highly successful method for use by anesthesiologists and pain physicians alike.

Journal Article↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Regional anesthesia for microsurgery in China: a review.

Between June 1968 and December 1985, a total of 1185 microsurgical operations were performed at the No. 6 Municipal Hospital, Shanghai. These included 500 reimplantations of amputated hands or fingers, 271 free transfers of toes, 96 free transfers of fibula, 63 free transfers of muscle, 34 reconstructions of hands, and 88 ENT procedures. The anesthetic methods used were brachial plexus block 401 (33.8%), cervical epidural block 232 (19.6%), general anesthesia 193 16.3%), double catheter lumbar and cervical epidural block 149 (12.6%), brachial plexus plus lumbar epidural block 123 (10.4%), lumbar epidural block alone 64 (5.4%), and acupuncture 22 (1.9%). Anesthesia in microsurgical operations must provide good operating conditions for very prolonged periods, devoid of any vasospasm and preferably with a degree of vasodilatation to facilitate vascular anastomosis.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗
PubMed1996

Digital pressure during interscalene block is clinically ineffective in preventing anesthetic spread to the cervical plexus.

The application of digital pressure above the injection site during interscalene block has been advocated to prevent cephalad spread of local anesthetic. In prior studies, radiographs taken immediately after interscalene injection of radiographic contrast have supported this concept. However, the clinical efficacy of digital pressure has not been previously tested. If digital pressure were effective in inhibiting cephalad spread of local anesthetic, attenuation of both hemidiaphragmatic paresis and the resulting compromise in pulmonary function would be expected. Sensory, motor, and pulmonary effects were prospectively evaluated in 20 patients presenting for elective shoulder surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive interscalene block with or without digital pressure. No clinical differences were seen between groups. All 20 patients had ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic paresis by ultrasonographic evaluation and large mean decreases in forced vital capacity, 31.2% +/- 7.8% (with digital pressure), 33.7% +/- 12.8% (without digital pressure), and forced expiratory volume at one second, 27.9% +/- 9.3% (with digital pressure), 33.7 +/- 12.8% (without digital pressure). Peak sensory level of anesthesia to pinprick was not significantly different between groups, each group having mean levels of C-2 to C-3. Digital pressure was ineffective in limiting the flow of local anesthetic into the cervical plexus. Digital pressure influenced neither the incidence of diaphragmatic paresis nor the resulting large decreases in pulmonary function that result from interscalene block.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Spinal cord infarction: etiology and outcome.

We reviewed 44 cases of ischemia and infarction of the spinal cord at two university hospitals. Three patients experienced transient ischemic attacks. Etiologies of completed strokes were diverse and included rupture and surgical repair of aortic aneurysms, aortic dissection, aortic rupture and thrombosis, global ischemia, anterior spinal artery embolism, repair and thrombosis of spinal arteriovenous malformations, hematomyelia, epidural hematoma, cervical osteophytosis, celiac plexus block, systemic lupus erythematosus, coagulopathy, and decompression sickness. Motor function improved in 12 patients, was substantial in only one, and occurred largely within the first 2 to 4 weeks. Favorable ambulatory outcome correlated with improving neurologic examinations and relatively preserved strength in hip abductors and knee extensors. More extensive deficits without initial improvement portended a more severe prognosis. Autonomic dysfunction, pain, paresthesia, and depression were common and impeded recovery in some patients. The mean level of deficit was at T-8 and in cases of global ischemia was at T-9, which leads us to dispute the classical view of a midthoracic watershed zone of ischemic vulnerability near T-4.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

[Two in one block for carotid surgery].

The choose of the best anaesthesia for carotid surgery is a very debated item: the locoregional techniques probably offer more hemodynamic stability and a direct neurologic monitoring, while general anaesthesia allows the complete control of airways and ventilation and reduces the global stress for the patient. This review analyzes the data of studies that compare general and locoregional anaesthesia. Among the latter, possibly elective techniques, the one described by Winnie combines an optimal analgesic efficacy with the lowest rate of adverse effects. A single bolus of a local anesthetic injected at a C4 level (apex of scalene muscles triangle) guarantees a complete block of the superficial and deep cervical plexuses.

Anesthesia, Local↗