SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Colonic Polyps”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

PubMed1999

An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy)

BACKGROUND: Computed tomographic (CT) colography (virtual colonoscopy) is a new imaging method for detection of colon polyps and cancer. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity of CT colography for polyp detection in a population without symptoms that included persons without colon neoplasia and with radiologists blinded to colonoscopic findings. METHODS: Forty-six persons without symptoms underwent spiral CT followed by same-day colonoscopy with subsequent inspection of two-dimensional axial CT images, interactive multiplanar images, and surfaced and volume-rendered images of the colon (three-dimensional CT colography). RESULTS: Three-dimensional CT colography was superior to two-dimensional axial imaging for detection of colon polyps. Three-dimensional CT colography depicted 1 of 4 (25%) adenomas 2 cm in diameter or larger, 6 of 10 (60%) adenomas 1 to 1.9 cm, 6 of 14 (43%) 6 to 9 mm, and 7 of 65 (11%) 5 mm in diameter or smaller. Three-dimensional CT colography showed a polyp that might have led to colonoscopy in 3 of 4 (75%) patients whose largest adenoma was 2 cm or larger, 5 of 6 (83%) patients with largest adenoma 1 to 1.9 cm, 3 of 7 (43%) patients with largest adenoma 6 to 9 mm, and 4 of 16 patients (25%) with largest adenoma 5 mm or smaller. Large, flat adenomas of the right colon were difficult to identify with three-dimensional CT colography. The specificity of three-dimensional CT colography for patients with adenomas 1 cm in diameter or larger was 89%. Examination of patients with missed adenomas after unblinding indicated that meticulous bowel preparation and adequate distention are critical to accurate interpretation. Perceptual errors were common. CONCLUSIONS: CT colography as performed in this study is not adequate as a colorectal cancer screening test. Several technical factors that appear critical to accurate performance of CT colography are defined.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2000

Approach to colon polyps in the elderly.

Colorectal cancer is a common but potentially preventable disease. Nearly all colorectal cancers are thought to arise from adenomatous polyps. The conclusions from the National Polyp Study strongly support the concept that the removal of polyps may prevent the future development of colorectal cancer. With the growing acceptance of screening for colorectal cancer, many elderly patients with adenomatous polyps will be discovered. Because increasing age is a powerful determinant of a higher prevalence of colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic individuals, physicians will need to be prepared to make informed decisions regarding the treatment of elderly patients with colonic polyps. The literature is reviewed and guidelines are formed regarding the optimal surveillance interval for patients with colonic polyps. The age at which surveillance and screening for colorectal neoplasia should stop is also reviewed. Conclusions are based on the currently available data.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

[Colonic polyps diagnosis by conventional video colonoscopes and chromoscopy with indigo carmine dye solution].

BACKGROUND: Magnification colonoscopy and contrast chromoscopy with indigo carmine dye solution have been used to differentiate neoplastic polyps (adenomas and adenocarcinomas) from non-neoplastic (hyperplastic, inflammatory, juvenile) in an attempt to obviate endoscopic polypectomy. On the other hand, little published information exists concerning conventional video colonoscopes and chromoscopy for polyp histology prediction. Aim - To assess usefullness of conventional video colonoscopes and contrast chromoscopy with indigo carmine solution for differential diagnosis of colon polyps. METHODS: In a routine colonoscopy series, we performed chromoscopy with conventional video colonoscopes before endoscopic excision of detected polyps. If a sulcus pattern was observed on the surface of the lesion, it was classified as neoplastic. Polyps were classified as non-neoplastic if no sulcus was detected on its surface. These observations were then compared with histology. RESULTS: In the study period (18 months), we detected 133 polyps in 53 patients. We were able to compare results of histology and chromoscopy in 126 lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were 56,4%, 79,2%, 65,1%, 52,8%, and 81,5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: On the base of the presented data, we concluded that conventional video colonoscopes and contrast chromoscopy with indigo carmine solution is not a good technique for differential diagnosis of colon polyps.

Adenoma↗

PubMed1999

Polymorphism of GSTM1 gene in patients with colorectal cancer and colonic polyps.

The frequency of the GSTM1 gene in patients with nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (CRC) (n = 70) and in subjects with colonic polyps (n = 27) was evaluated and compared with healthy individuals (n = 145). Patients with CRC were divided into the three groups: patients coming from the families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) (n = 17); patients with a high risk of HNPCC who were referred to as suspected of HNPCC (n = 25); patients with sporadic colorectal cancer without clinical features of hereditary tumours (n = 28). A simple polymerase chain reaction (PCR) - based assay to identify GSTM1 nulled and positive (non-nulled) genotype was used. No significant differences in frequency of nulled individuals were observed in both patients with HNPCC and patients suspected of HNPCC as well as in subjects with colonic polyps. The most interesting observation was made in the group of patients with sporadic CRC. Twenty individuals (71.4 %) of the group were GSTM 1 deficient which was significantly different from the control population (p < 0.04). The above data indicate that the absence of the GSTM1 gene is associated with a greater risk of sporadic colorectal cancer. There is an increase in the overall risk of approximately 2.5 as compared with the control population.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Immunomodulatory effect of beta-carotene on T lymphocyte subsets in patients with resected colonic polyps and cancer.

Results from a number of studies suggest that beta-carotene-containing foods prevent the initiation or progression of various cancers. One possible mechanism for this effect could be enhancement of the immune response. The aim of this study was to determine whether beta-carotene modulates T lymphocyte subsets in patients affected with colonic polyps or cancerous lesions. Patients with previous adenomatous colonic polyps (n = 18) or colon cancers (n = 19) were randomized to receive placebo or beta-carotene (30 mg/day) for three months. Percentages of T lymphocyte subsets were determined using flow cytometry in blood samples collected before randomization and at three months. T lymphocyte subsets of 14 normal control subjects were also determined for comparison. Initially, there was no difference in total leukocyte counts, percentage of lymphocytes, and various subsets of lymphocytes among the three groups, although in cancer patients there was a lower percentage of CD4 and interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor-positive (IL-2R+) cells than in patients with polyps and in controls. After supplementation with beta-carotene, a significant increase in IL-2R+ T lymphocytes (from 12.7 +/- 3.0% to 26.0 +/- 1.9%) and CD4+ lymphocytes (from 40.9 +/- 3.1% to 45.6 +/- 3.2%) was seen only in the cancer patients. These percentages remained unchanged in patients with adenomatous polyps receiving placebo or beta-carotene. We concluded that beta-carotene increased the number of IL-2R+ T lymphocytes and CD4+ lymphocytes, which in turn may produce IL-2 only in patients with cancer who may already have some deficiency in their immune system. This increase in activated T lymphocytes may mediate cytotoxic reactions to cancer cells via cytokine production.

Adult↗

PubMed1984

Malignant colon polyps--cure by colonoscopy or colectomy?

Although malignant sessile colon polyps usually require colectomy for proper treatment, the vast majority of malignant pedunculated polyps can be removed colonoscopically for cure. The author's experience with 83 consecutively encountered malignant polypoid lesions is reviewed and is the basis for the discussion herein. All 49 malignant pedunculated polyps were removed colonoscopically. Eight of these patients also underwent colectomy because of questionable or definite presence of cancer cells within the stalk portion of the polyp; no residual cancer was identified at the polypectomy site, and all lymph nodes were negative in these patients. Of 34 patients with malignant sessile polypoid lesions, 13 underwent colectomy because of obvious malignancy at colonoscopy. Twenty-one sessile lesions were removed colonoscopically; with malignancy documented, nine of the 21 patients underwent colectomy. Positive findings (either cancer at the polypectomy site or in lymph nodes) at surgery were identified in two of these nine patients. Colonoscopic polypectomy can be considered curative for malignant pedunculated polyps provided the stalk portion of the lesion is totally uninvolved with the malignant process, provided there is no lymphatic or vascular invasion, the malignancy is well differentiated, and follow-up endoscopic examination of the polypectomy site reveals no residual or recurrence. These four criteria must be satisfied in order to consider a malignant pedunculated polyp curatively removed by colonoscopic polypectomy alone. The risk of colectomy in patients satisfying these four criteria is believed to be greater than the risk of metastatic disease and death from this lesion. Colectomy is recommended for all patients with malignant sessile polypoid lesions, provided their general medical condition provides an acceptable operative risk. Although colonoscopic polypectomy is not recommended for obviously malignant sessile polyps, there are instances where sessile lesions are removed colonoscopically and found microscopically to contain focal or minute areas of invasive cancer. In certain of these patients, the risk of colectomy may exceed the risk of recurrence or metastasis, if the polypoid lesion has been totally removed colonoscopically and completeness of the polypectomy has been documented by follow-up colonoscopy. Each patient's clinical history, general condition, and histopathology must be reviewed individually by a clinician experienced in this field in order to reach a wise and proper decision regarding the potential need for colectomy, and limit colectomy to those patients in whom it is absolutely necessary.

Adenoma↗

PubMed1999

Colon polyps and cancer.

A number of recent publications dealing with colon polyps and cancer emphasize cost-effectiveness and the outcomes of screening and follow-up surveillance of high-risk groups. These groups include patients with either a past personal history or a family history of colorectal adenomas or cancer. Several papers address the effectiveness and compliance with different methods of screening of the asymptomatic, average-risk population for colorectal neoplasia. Other important publications deal with colorectal cancer prevention, the natural history of the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, diagnosis of polyps and cancer, colonoscopic polypectomy, management of the patient with a malignant polyp, and endoscopic treatment of obstructing cancer.

Colonic Polyps↗

PubMed1988

Small colon polyps.

One thousand forty-eight small (up to 6 mm) colorectal polyps, removed during colonoscopy, have been analyzed. Sixty-one percent of these small polyps were neoplastic, the remainder being equally divided between hyperplastic polyps and polypoid mucosa with normal-appearing glands. The number of polyps was evenly distributed throughout the colon. Proximally, neoplastic polyps predominated, accounting for 73% of all polyps in the right colon. This was reversed in the distal colon where non-neoplastic polyps comprised 65% of all polyps in the rectum. The incidence of carcinoma was extremely low in small colon polyps, 0.1%. All polyps should be removed when encountered during colonoscopy due to the high prevalence of adenomas among small colon polyps.

Adult↗

PubMed1978

Colon polyps, sebaceous cysts, gastric polyps, and malignant brain tumor in a family.

A unique family with a distinct syndrome of adenomatous colonic polyps and sebaceous cysts without osseous or soft tissue abnormalities is presented. One member had benign gastric polyps limited to the upper half of the stomach and another had a medulloblastoma of the cerebellum. A histologic feature in the colon of the propositus was the presence of atypical epithelium in flat mucosa as well as in the colonic polyps.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1994

Colonic polyps in an unselected population: prevalence, characteristics, and associations.

OBJECTIVES: To provide a proctosigmoidoscopic review of a very large set of unselected control subjects, providing an unbiased view of colonic polyps in the general population. METHODS: Sigmoidoscopic data from 406 sequentially recruited subjects were analyzed. Participation rates were over 85%, and subjects were thus free of the usual selection bias. RESULTS: Thirty-eight percent of screened individuals were found to have distal colonic polyps. Adenomas were found in 12%, and hyperplastic polyps were found in 30% of screened individuals. Adenomas were more prevalent in males and in older individuals. Hyperplastic prevalence did not differ significantly by gender or age. Synchronous adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps occurred in 3% of screened individuals, but these lesions were not associated. CONCLUSIONS: Distal colonic adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps are very common in the general population and are not associated. The high frequency of these polyps raises questions about the feasibility of biopsy for all polyps, and suggests that further study is needed to determine the appropriate indications for subsequent colonoscopy.

Adenomatous Polyps↗

PubMed2006

Characterization of colonic polyps at conventional (nonmagnifying) colonoscopy after spraying with 0.2 % indigo carmine dye.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Japanese endoscopists have devised a classification system based on mucosal crypt patterns which is helpful for distinguishing between hyperplastic polyps, adenomas, and invasive cancers at colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to assess how well the various types of colonic polyp could be distinguished using conventional colonoscopes after spraying with 0.2 % indigo carmine dye. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The endoscopic appearances of all colonic lesions were assessed in 476 unselected patients using normal-resolution, nonmagnifying colonoscopes after spraying with 0.2 % indigo carmine dye. RESULTS: A total of 709 lesions were found in the 476 patients, and histology was available for 673 of these lesions: 187 lesions were found to be non-neoplastic (128 hyperplastic, 2 juvenile, 30 inflammatory, and 27 classified as "others"); 467 lesions were adenomatous; and 19 lesions were carcinomas. Of the 467 adenomas, 377 were tubular, 77 were tubulovillous, 8 were villous and 5 were serrated; 423/467 were correctly identified (sensitivity 91 %). Of the 187 non-neoplastic lesions, 153 were correctly classified (specificity 82 %). A total of 343 of the 377 tubular lesions were correctly identified as tubular adenomas (sensitivity 90 %), and 46 of the 77 tubulovillous lesions were correctly identified. CONCLUSIONS: Standard colonoscopy with dye spraying can be used to differentiate colonic polyps. Magnification is not always necessary to distinguish neoplastic from nonneoplastic colonic lesions. This finding could result in resource savings in colonoscopic screening.

Adult↗

PubMed1985

Dominant inheritance of adenomatous colonic polyps and colorectal cancer.

Except in the rare polyposis syndromes, the contribution of heritable factors to the genesis of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps is not well understood. We examined the inheritance of susceptibility to colonic polyps and cancer in a large Utah pedigree with multiple cases of common colorectal cancer but no recognizable inheritance pattern among them. Inheritance was clarified, however, by systematic screening for colonic polyps in pedigree members and spouse controls, using flexible proctosigmoidoscopy. One or more adenomatous polyps were found in 21 per cent of family members (41 of 191) but in only 9 per cent of controls (12 of 132) (P less than 0.005). Pedigree analysis was performed with likelihood methods that compared random occurrence of cancer and polyps with autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant patterns of inheritance. The analysis suggested that the observed excess of discrete adenomatous polyps and colorectal cancers was the result of an inherited autosomal dominant gene for susceptibility, rather than an inherited recessive gene for susceptibility or a chance occurrence. This type of inheritance of colorectal polyps and cancer may be more common than previously recognized.

Adult↗

PubMed1985

Colonic polyps.

Carcinoma of the large bowel arises almost exclusively in neoplastic polyps, which are present in 5-10% of the population over age 40. These polyps may be of three histologic types: (a) tubular adenoma (adenomatous polyp), (b) tubulovillous adenoma (villoglandular polyp), and (c) villous adenoma. The tendency for malignant change is greatest in the villous adenoma (41%) and in tubulovillous (villoglandular polyps--23%). In tubular adenomas (simple adenomatous polyps), the incidence of malignancy is 5% over all. The tendency toward malignant change is determined by histologic type, size, and degree of atypicality of adenoma. Early detection and complete removal of neoplastic polyps of the colon are essential to the prevention of cancer of the large bowel, and this may usually be done in most cases with the colonoscope.

Adenoma↗

PubMed1990

[Stomach cancer metastasizing into a solitary adenomatous colonic polyp].

A 69-year-old man with known diffuse type gastric stump carcinoma was found at autopsy to have widely disseminated metastasis of this cancer. Metastasis also occurred in the adenomatous polyp of the cecum. This is the third report, to our knowledge, in the literature and the first Hungarian publication of a metastasis to an adenomatous polyp of the colon.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1995

Effect of sulindac on sporadic colonic polyps.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We sought to determine in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study if the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug sulindac causes regression of sporadic colonic polyps. The impetus for this study is the profound regressive effect of sulindac on polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis. METHODS: Asymptomatic patients undergoing routine screening flexible sigmoidoscopy were enrolled if they had polyps of < or = 1 cm in size. Of 162 patients screened, 22 patients were randomly enrolled to take 150 mg of sulindac twice daily, and 22 patients took a placebo. Treatment duration was 4 months and was followed by colonoscopy with removal of all polyps. RESULTS: Four patients were dropped from the study (sulindac group) due to urosepsis (1 patient), heartburn (2 patients), and anemia (1 patient). Compliance (determined by monthly pill counting), mean age, and the effect of sulindac vs. placebo on polyp regression or size were not statistically different in the two treatment groups. Analysis of our data indicated that there is only a 0.8% chance that the probability of polyp regression with sulindac is as large as 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Four months of treatment with sulindac does not result in a clinically significant regression of sporadic colonic polyps, although a small effect may not have been detected by the size of our study. Our data suggest that the biological response of sporadic and familial polyposis polyps to sulindac is different.

Aged↗

PubMed1995

Concurrent colon polyp with angiodysplasia causes lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a case report.

Angiodysplasia is an important cause of gastrointestinal bleeding which occurs mostly common in the right side of the colon, usually in the elderly but sometimes in younger adults. Herein, a case of rare clinical association-adenomatous colonic polyp with submucosal angiodysplasia in a forty year old man, who had repeated intestinal bleeding, is reported. We think colon polyps inducing intestinal blood loss may be caused by unidentified angiodysplasia. The diagnosis of these lesions is very difficult, so mesenteric angiography is recommended. Although various therapeutic methods were suggested, in patients who have repeated bleeding or are chronic anemics, resection of the involved segment of the bowel is the treatment of choices.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Establishment of a colonic polyp registry in Rhode Island.

A colonic adenomatous polyp registry (PR) has been organized at the Roger Williams Medical Center whose main functions are to prevent the occurrence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the enrollees, to provide a population of subjects for epidemiological and interventional studies, and to provide educational, including dietary, information to subjects and physicians. One hundred four and 202 patients with polyps, originally retrieved from the hospital pathology files, were enrolled in the 1984 and 1987 cohorts, respectively, of whom about 90% were followed for at least three years after polypectomy. Three carcinomas, all Dukes A, were found in the right colon in the follow-up period. New polyps identified in the first three years after polypectomy were generally small tubular adenomas with a greater predilection for the right colon than was found for the index polyps. Risk factors for new polyps included history of previous polyps and, probably, multiple index polyps. The use of colonoscopy for postpolypectomy surveillance increased between 1984 and 1987. About 25% of the subjects in each cohort were either lost to follow-up or received no endoscopic surveillance. On the other hand, some of those who were followed were probably subjected to excessive numbers of procedures. Defects in the PR include inadequacy of personal and family history data, and steady loss of patients during the three to six years after polypectomy. Despite the small size and limited resources of our hospital, its colonic polyp registry has already provided information that may help in the management of patients with this premalignant condition. The more widespread use of securely funded polyp registries would probably reduce the incidence of metachronous CRC in that population and would have significant epidemiological and educational functions.

Adenomatous Polyps↗

PubMed1990

Cancerous colonic polyps. "Hands on" or "hands off?".

Management of the malignant colonic polyp remains a subject for debate even after almost two decades of experience. Some researchers believe all patients should have a colonic resection; others argue that only certain cases call for laparotomy, while still others hold for a selective approach but with varying criteria. Therefore, a survey has been made of current practice and opinion from the time colonoscopic polypectomy was introduced in 1969 to the present. The authors have reviewed a sizable segment of their experience, dividing cases of malignant polyps into two broad categories: those in which complete polypectomy was followed by bowel resection; and those undergoing polypectomy alone. The determinants leading to one course or the other were analyzed, as were the results.

Colectomy↗